Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-09-07 (6)MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council. Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF.T$IS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE' PLANNING, DEPARTMENT OFFICE. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1966 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Miller, Bazila Lawson, Tom, Worthy, Larkin. r COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. MINUTES: . 04 motion by Worthy and seconded by Miller, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of July 26, and August 2, 1966, were accepted as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary. USE PERMIT NO. 65-15 - Continued. Applicant -- Huntington Pacific Corp. The Secretary informed the Commission that the mean high tide still has not been determined by the State Lands Commission; therefore, the public hearing should be continued_ until October 4, 1966. The bearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LARKIN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON USE PERMIT NO 655-15 TO OCTOBER 4, 1966. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Bazil, Lawson, Tom, Wort4y, Larkin. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. b, THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 66-45 Applicant - Slater Development Co. The Secretary informed the Commission that this is a routine change.of zone and the applicant is complying with a condition of approval on Tentativa Tract Maps 5855 and 6183._ The Secretary further suggested that any future application for Change of zone on adjacent property should include the school site. The hearing was opened to the ,aduience, there being no comment, the hearing was closed. 9/'7/66. El Page No. 2 Minutes: H.B, Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 RESOLUTION NO. 66-45 A Resolution of the City Planning � Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 66-45 to the City Council A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLER -TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 66-45 RECO=NDING APPROVAL,OF ZONE CASE NO 66-45 TO THE 61TY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This change of zone is in compliance with conditions imposed on the approval of TeAt4tive Tracts 5855 and 6183. ROLL, CALL VOTE: AYES: Mill9r, Bazil, Lawson, Tom, Worthy, Larkin. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAWSON AND SECONDED BY TOM TO REZONE THE SCHOOL SITE AT THE TIME AN APPLIOA.- TION FOR A ZONE CHANGE IS SUBMITTED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Bazil, Lawson,.Worthy, Larkin, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 66-46' ghane of Zone from R-2 Two Applicant - Tic Toe Markets Inc. Family Residence District to C-.1 Neighborhood Commercial District with setback provisions. The Secretary read a petition signed by 8 property owners endorsing the proposal. Secretary. The Staff Repgrt was read by the The hearing was opened to the audience. Fred 'Barbour, 123ll Chapman Avenue, Garden Grove, addressed the Commission and gave his reasons for the request. hearing was closed. There being no other comment, the Commission discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO 66-46 FOR THE FOLLOW- ING REASONS: 1. It would be an improvement for t4e.surrounding area. 2. The property owners of the adjacent area have endorsed the proposal, -2- 9/7/66. Page No. 3 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, NOES: Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Lawson. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY. RESOLUTION NO. 66-46. A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Denial of Zone Case No. 66-46 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAWSON AND SECONDED BY TOM TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 66-46 RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CASE: NO 66-46 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. This would be an extension of commercial zoning along Heil Ave. 2. It does not eliminate strip commercial zoning. 3. Vehicular access would be taken from a local street. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil. NOES: Worthy, Miller. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 66-47 Applicant - Clarence 0. Rud Change of zone from R-A Residential Agricultural District to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hear�n$ was opened to the audience. Ralph Allen, representing -the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the request. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO 66-47 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 66-47 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAWSON AND SECONDED BY TOM TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 66-47 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 66-47 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. This area is master punned for commercial purposes. 2. The commercial zone will only run 115 feet south on Springdale Street and 300 feet on Edinger Avenue. 3. Only three corners of the intersection will be zoned for commercial use. -3-- 9/7/66. Page No. 4 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Worthy, Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. USE VARIANCE NO. 66-39 Applicant - Security Fore Corp. I T To allow 6 contiguous lots in a block to average 60 ft. in width and 6000 sq. ft. of lot area in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The: hearing was opened to the audience. Ron Foell, representing the appli- cant, addressed the Commission and gave his reasons for the request. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. A, MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECON�ED BY LAWSON TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF USE VARIANCE NO 66-39 TO THE " CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: `+ 1. All streets shall comply with standards proposed by the Department of Public Works and approved by both the Planning Commission (August 3, 1965) and City Council (September 7, 1965). 2. A full-grown tree, as approved by the Park Supervisor, shall be planted in the front yard of each lot and in the exterior side yard of each corner lot. 3. The minimum lot frbritage shall not be less than 50 ft. wide with 5000 sq. ft. of lot area. An average lot width of 60 ft. of frontage with 6000 sq. ft. of lot area shall be provided for each six contiguous lots in a block,. 4. Use Variance No 66-26 shall be null and void. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Larkin, Bazil, Lawson, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO 66-40 Applicant - B. G. Williams To allow the construction of a —' medical -dental building in the �•� R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. ° audi. enc e . The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the --4- 9/7/66. Page No. 5 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 B. G. Williams, applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the proposal. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO 66-40 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Bolsa Chica Street and Kona Drive shall be fully improved to City Standards. Improvements shall include street trees, street lights and street signs. 2. The water system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. 3. All utilities shall be installed underground. 4. Prior to final inspection, a change of zone application to R-5 shall be submitted on both,Lots 8 and 9. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: t 1. It would serve as an excellent buffer between Bolsa Chica Street and the multiple family residences to the west. 2. There is a need for a medical facility in this area. ROLL CALL VOTE: It AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Worthy, Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. I MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE - STUDY AREA I (Continued) Floyd Belsito, Associate Planner, made a presentation of the proposed Master Plan of Land Use Study Area I. Mr. Belsito distributed copies of an analysis of the General Plan in relation to Study Area I. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Paul Ottoson, Signal Oil and Gas Company, addressed the Commission and read a letter objecting to certain features of the proposed master plan. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO 66-3'STUDY AREA I A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Master Plan Amendment No 66-3 Study Area I to the City Council. 9/7/66. ,) Page No. 6 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAWSON AND SECONDED BY LARKIN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 66-3 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO 66-3, STUDY AREA I, TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Worthy, Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. CODE AMENDMENT NO 66-14 - Continued S-1 SHORE LINE DISTRICT, ZONE CASE 66 -36 Continued The Secretary suggested that this " item and the next item'on the agenda be considered at the same time. The hearings on Code Amendment 66-14 and Zone Case 66-36 were opened to the audience. William Garland, representing the Bolsa Chica Corporation and Randolph Karr, representing the Pacific Electric Railroad addressed the Commission and stated that they did not have sufficient time to review the Staff's proposal and requested that both matters be continued. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LARKIN AND SECONDED BY TOM TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON CODE AMENDMENT NO 66-141 S-1 SHORELINE DISTRICT, AND -ZONE�CASE '66-36 TO SEPTEMBER 27, 1966. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Worthy,- Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT - PRINTING PLANTS The Secretary distributed copies of a proposed code amendment pertaining to Articles 951 and 953 which would add printing plants to uses permitted in the M-1 and M-1-A zones. The Commission reviewed the proposed code amendment. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL -OF THE CODE AMENDMENT PRINTING PLANTS TO CITY COUNCIL. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Worthy, Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. -6- 9/7/66. Page No. 7 Minutes: H.H. Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT OUTDOOR PORTABLE SANITATION FACILITIES The Secretary distributed a proposed code amendment pertaining to: 1. Prohibiting btorake.-gf outdoor portable sanitation facilities and the abatement of said uses within. 6 months from the effective date of the ordinance; 2. Requiring all rooftop mechanical features on professional, commercial, industrial, and gp.asi-public or public buildings to be screened from view. The Commission reviewed the proposed code amendment. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO SET SAID CODE AMENDMENT FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, Bazil, Worthy, Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT YARD REQUIREMENTS IN COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE -PROFESSIONAL DISTRICTS' The Secretary distributed copies of a proposed code amendment pertaining to yard requirements in the commercial and office -professional zones. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY,�WORTHY TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO SET SAID PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT `FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ROLL CALL, -,:VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Tom, Larkin, BazSl, Worthy, Miller. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. INFORMATION: The Secretary informed the Com- mission that the City Council has adopted the Master Plan Amend- ment at Beach Blvd. and Warner Avenue, therefore, the Commission should initiate zone changes and precise plans for street align- ment to implement the master plan. FLOYD BELSITO Floyd Belsito, Associate Planner, distributed copies of.t4e proposed Master Plan of Huntington Beach Goals and Objectives. It was the consensus to continue said item to the September 27., 1966, study session. -7- 9/7/66. Page No. 8 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, September 7, 1966 COMMUNICATION: The Commission received a letter submitted by the Huntington Beach Elementary School District regarding estimated educational costs to the taxpayers for different dwelling unit densities per acre, The matter was received and filed. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED. K. A. Reynold6 Robert D. Bazil Secretary C�iairman -8- 9/7/66.