Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-06-06MINUTES ,* d4 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. TUESDAY, JUNE 69 1967 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer, Bazil. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Tom. MINUTES: On motion by Miller and seconded by Bazil, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of May 2, 1967, were accepted as transcribed and mailed -by the Secretary. MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 67-2 - STUDY AREA III - Continued ZONE CASE NO. 67-12 RESOLUTION OF INTENT - Continued Change_ of zone from: A) R-l'Single Family Residence District to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions; B) R-1 Single Family Residence District to R-5 Office -Professional District; C) R-1 Single Family Residence District to R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. D) R-1 Single Family Residence District to R-2 Two Family Residence District. PRECISE PLAN ALIGMENT NO. 67-2 - Continued Resolution of Intent proposes to precise plan the alignment of Vine- land Drive and four (4) future streets. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that these three items were continued from the May 16, 1967,meeting. He also informed the Commission that item #9, Zone Case No. 67-15 should be considered at the same time because it is within the study area. ZONE CASE NO. 67-15 (item #9) Applicant - B & J Investments Inc. Change of zone from R-1 Single Family Residence District to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions. 6/6/67. Page No. 2 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967 The Planning Director made a presentation of 1) the proposed Master Plan of Land Use; 2) existing zoning; 3) Zone Case No. 67-12; 4) precise plan of street alignment; and 5) Zone Case No. 67-15. The hearing was opened to the audience on all four items. COMMISSIONER TOM: Commissioner Tom arrived at 6:28 P.M. and assumed his duties. The following property owners addressed the Commission and were opposed to the proposal: Joseph Halisky, Jack Beaman, Marty Anneaberg, Julia Halisky, Joyce Anneaberg, Thomas Vance and Ray Jackson. Mr. Joe O'Campo addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of Zone Case No. 67-15. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 67-2 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Master Plan Amendment No. 67-2, Study Area III as amended to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 67-2 MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 67-29 STUDY AREA III AS AMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer, Bazil, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. RESOLUTION NO. 67-12 A resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 67-12 Sub Item "A" and "C" and recommending approval of Sub Item "B" as modified and denial of Sub Item "D" to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 67-12 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 67-12 SUB 'ITEM "A" AND "C" AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SUB ITEM "B" AS MODIFIED AND RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF SUB ITEM "D" TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This proposal will implement the proposed Master Plan of Land Use Amendment No. 67-2, Study Area III. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES': Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer, Bazil, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. -2- 6/6/670 Page No. 3 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967 PRECISE PLAN ALIGNMENT NO. 67-2 esolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 67-2 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAWSON AND SECONDED BY TOM TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 67-2 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP PREPARED BY THE PLANNING STAFF. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO. 67-15 Applicant - B & J Investments, Inc. Change of zone from R-1 Single Family Residence District to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions. RESOLUTION NO. 67-15 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Denial of Zone Case No. 67-15 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 67-15 RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 67-15 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. The proposed zone change does not comply with the studies for Master Plan Amendment No. 67-2, Study Area III recently adopted by the Planning Commission. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-10 - Continued Applicant - Mills Construction To allow the construction of garden apartment complex in the R-2 Two Family Residence District. The Acting Secretary read a letter submitted by Ralph Van Buskirk, representing the applicant, requesting a 60 days continuance. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed. -3- 6/6/67. Page No. 4 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON USE VARIANCE NO. 67-10 TO JULY 59 19679 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-19 - Continued Applicant - Hiromichi Sakioka To permit a wholesale nursery in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that this item was continued from the last meet- ing to allow time for the Commissioners to investigate similar uses in the area and to allow the applicant's representative time to determine the type of plants that would be grown. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mike Burns, 8671 Viceroy Circle, City, addressed the Commission and submitted a petition signed by 70 property owners objecting to the proposal. George Shibata, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the type of plants that will be grown on the subject property. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. The Commission held a lengthy discussion. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECOND- ED BY LARKIN TO DENY USE VARIANCE NO. 67-19 FOR THE FOLLOW- ING REASONS: 1. The applicant failed to show sufficient justification for the request. 2. The property has an established use. 3. The proposal would be a commercial use in an R-1 zone. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer. NOES: Miller, Worthy, Tom. -ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. -4- 6/6/67. 1 1 I 1 Page No. 5 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6405 191 Lots on 49.5 Acres USE VARIANCE NO. 67-24 Applicant - Huntington Harbour Corp. To permit subdivision and development of the property as indicated on tentative tract no. 6405 for single family dwell- ings and appurtenant structures as follows: 1) On waterfront lots with minimum areas of 5000 sq. ft. per lot and minimum average widths of 50 ft. per lot. 2) On waterfront lots with a minimum of 35 lineal feet of frontage for every lot. 3) Adjoining streets with minimum 50 ft. right-of-way widths (no change in 40 ft. roadway widths) except for a 52 ft. right-of-way width for Way- farer Circle, and a 55 ft. right-of- way width for Carousel Lane adjoining Lots 180-186, inclusive. 4) Adjoining cul-de-sacs with 45 ft. property line radii. Also allowing the following minimum setbacks: 1) 10 ft. front yard setbacks for dwell- ings, and 20 ft. front yard setbacks for garages having direct entrances from street. 2) 10 ft. rear yard setbacks, and waiver of the requirements for 900 sq. ft. of open space within the rear 2/3 of each lot. The Subdivision Committee Report and the Staff Report were read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Richard Maitland of Huntington Harbour introduced Mr. John McIntyre, engineer for the applicant. Mr. McIntyre addressed the Commis- sion and explained the proposal. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6405 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The Tentative Map received May 18, 1967, shall be the approved layout. 2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be nutl and void unless Use Variance No. 67-24 is approved by the City Council. -5- 6/6/67. Page No. 6 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. 3. All waterways shall be deeded in fee to the City. 4. A Harbor Maintenance District shall be formed. 5. All property within Tentative Tract Map No. 6405 shall annex to the Harbor Maintenance District. 6. Docking facilities within Lot "D" shall be prohibited. 7. All utilities shall be installed underground. 8. Lot "E" and Lot "F" shall remain under private owner- ship and provisions shall be made for the perpetual maintenance of said lots by the adjacent property owners. 9. Docking facilities within Lot "E" and Lot "F" shall be approved by the Department of Harbors and Beaches and the Department of Public Works. 10. All "Standard Conditions of Approval" for tentative tract that are applicable shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROYER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO'RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF USE VARIANCE NO. 67-24 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The minimum front yard setback shall be 10 ft. except the minimum setback for garages entered directly from the street shall be 22 ft. This condition of approval is not general in nature and a precise plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any building permits. Said plan shall delineate the house location on each lot. 2. Where sidewalks are constructed adjacent to the curb, a tree, equivalent to a 30 inch box tree, as approved by the Park Supervisor, shall be planted in the front yard of each lot and in the exterior side yard of each corner lot. 3. The rear yard setback on waterfront lots may be 10 ft. and the 900 sq. ft. of open space on waterfront lots need not be provided. 4. Waterfront lots shall be a minimum of 5000 sq. ft. in area with a minimum lot width of 50 ft. at the 20 ft. setback line. 5. Non -waterfront lots shall be averaged to meet the minimum lot requirements. 6. Street widths shall be as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map No. 6405. i AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This is a waterfront development on an island. -6- 6/6/67. 1 FJ Page No. 5 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6405 191 Lots on 49.5 Acres USE VARIANCE NO. 67-24 Applicant - Huntington Harbour Corp. To permit subdivision and development of the property as indicated on tentative tract no. 6405 for single family dwell- ings and appurtenant structures as follows: 1) On waterfront lots with minimum areas of 5000 sq. ft. per lot and minimum average widths of 50 ft. per lot. 2) On waterfront lots with a minimum of 35 lineal feet of frontage for every lot. 3) Adjoining streets with minimum 50 ft. right-of-way widths (no'change in 40 ft. roadway widths) except for a 52 ft. right-of-way width for Way- farer Circle, and a 55 ft. right-of- way width for Carousel Lane adjoining Lots 180-186, inclusive. 4) Adjoining cul-de-sacs with 45 ft. property line radii. Also allowing the following minimum setbacks: 1) 10 ft. front yard setbacks for dwell- ings, and 20 ft. front yard setbacks for garages having direct entrances from street. 2) 10 ft. rear yard setbacks, and waiver of the requirements for 900 sq. ft. of open space within the rear 2/3 of each lot. The Subdivision Committee Report and the Staff Report were read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Richard Maitland of Huntington Harbour introduced Mr. John McIntyre, engineer for the applicant. Mr. McIntyre addressed the Commis- sion and explained the proposal. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 6405 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The Tentative Map received May 18, 1967, shall be the approved layout. 2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be nukl and void unless Use Variance No. 67-24 is approved by the City Council. -5- 6/6/67. Page No. 6 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. 3. All waterways shall be deeded in fee to the City. 4. A Harbor Maintenance District shall be formed. 5. All property within Tentative Tract Map No. 6405 shall annex to the Harbor Maintenance District. 6. Docking facilities within Lot "D" shall be prohibited. 7. All utilities shall be installed underground. 8. Lot "E" and Lot "F" shall remain under private owner- ship and provisions shall be made for the perpetual maintenance of said lots by the adjacent property owners. 9. Docking facilities within Lot "E" and Lot "F" shall be approved by the Department of Harbors and Beaches and the Department of Public Works. 10. All "Standard Conditions of Approval" for tentative tract that are applicable shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROYER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO'RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF USE VARIANCE NO. 67-24 TO.THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The minimum front yard setback shall be 10 ft. except the minimum setback for garages entered directly from the street shall be 22 ft. This condition of approval is not general in nature and a precise plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any building permits. Said plan shall delineate the house location on each lot. 2. Where sidewalks are constructed adjacent to the curb, a tree, equivalent to a 30 inch box tree, as approved by the Park Supervisor, shall be planted in the front yard of each lot and in the exterior side yard of each corner lot. 3. The rear yard setback on waterfront lots may be 10 ft. and the 900 sq. ft. of open space on waterfront lots need not be provided. 4. Waterfront lots shall be a minimum of 5000 sq. ft. in area with a minimum lot width of 50 ft. at the 20 ft. setback line. 5. Non -waterfront lots shall be averaged to meet the minimum lot requirements. 6. Street widths shall be as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map No. 6405. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This is a waterfront development on an island. -6- 6/6/67. Page No. 7 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Larkin, Lawson, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 67-16 RESOLUTION OF INTENT Change of zone from: 1) R-2-0 to R-29 2) R-3-0 to R-3; 3) R-4-0 to R-4; 4) C-3-0 to C-3; 5) M-2-0 to M-2. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that this zone change was initiated to implement the City Council's request for removal and consolidation of "0" zoned property wherever possible, The Planning Director explained the proposal. The hearing was opened to the audience. Two letters of opposition and one Metter endorsing the proposal were submitted to the Commission. The following representatives for various oil companies addressed the Commission and gave their opinions regarding removal of the "0" zone: A. C. Marion, J. D. Bertino, Don Fairbanks, T. V. Talbert and R. F. Hilderbrand, There being no other comment the hearing was closed. It was the consensus of the Commis- sion to continue Zone Case No. 67-16 to the August 1, 1967 meeting to allow time for the oil committee to submit a report pertaining to the proposal, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON ZONE CASE NO. 67-16 TO AUGUST 1, 1967. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. RECESS CALLED: The Chairman called a recess at 9:50 P.M. COMMISSION RECONVENED: The Commission reconvened at 10:05 P.M. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-21 Applicant - Robert Cow ill o allow the installation of 2 additional overhead utilities in deviation to the required underground installation thereof. ing Secretary. The Staff Report was read by the Act- -7- 6/6/67 Page No. 8 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. The hearing was opened to the audience. The applicant addressed the Commission and explained the reason for the request, hearing was closed. There being no other comment the The Commission discussed the request. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-21 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The property is served by existing overhead utility lines and there are several existing overhead drops. 2. It would cause a hardship to require underground utilities on only two stores. 3. The development was under construction prig to adoption of the ordinance requiring utility lines to be installed underground. 4. Granting of this variance will not set a precedent. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-23 Applicant - Golden West Industrial Park To allow the installation of 4 over- head utilities in deviation to the required underground installation thereof. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. McDonald, applicant, addressed the Commission and gave his reasons for the request. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. The Acting Secretary pointed out that the applicant has, on three different occasions, been required to install underground utilities. He further stated that the requirement was a condition of approval of three separate divisions of land dating back to December, 1965, and on April 129 1966, the applicant signed and re- corded an agreement with the City agreeing to install underground utilities. It was noted that the applicant did not comply with these conditions and is requesting relief from the requirement of the division of land as well as Section 9730.23 of the H. B. Ordinance Code. -8- 6/6/67. n 1 Page No. 9 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. A lengthy discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND -- SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-23 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall install underground utilities for the street lights. 2. The overhead service drops shall not exceed 6 ft. in length. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. Buildings within the area have overhead service. 2. The subject property is surrounded by overhead utilities. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil. NOES: Tom, Royer. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSIONER TOM: Commissioner Tom stated the reason he voted noe was because it is contrary to an agreement signed by the applicant and it will set a precedent for future decisions. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-26 Applicant - Beach Development Co. To allow an overhead service drop from existing poles to the homes in Tract No. 5368. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. John Horner, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and gave his reasons for the request. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LARKIN AND SECONDED BY LAWSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-26 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. Service panels on the houses shall be installed to take underground utilities at a later date. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There are existing overhead utility lines and poles along property lines. 2. In this case, the requirement for underground utilities will not accomplish the esthetic intent of the ordinance. -9- 6/6/67. Page No. 10 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil. NOES: Royer, Tom. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-25 Applicant - H.B. Moose Lodge #1832 To permit a lodge and club to be located in the M-1 Light Industrial District. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Don Allgood, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that there will be sufficient off-street parking provided. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LAWSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-27 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall enter into an agreement to provide all required off-street parking within 300 ft. Said agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney and Planning Department. 2. Use Variance No. 67-27 shall be null and void if the agreement to provide all required off-street parking is not complied with. 3. The applicant shall comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code and Building Department requirements. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. The use will be compatible with an industrial area and not detrimental to surrounding uses. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Bazil, Royer, Tom NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-27 Applicant - Stanley Ruiz & Roy Russell To permit a temporary produce sales stand in the C-2 Community Business District. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. -10- 6/6/67. Page No. 11 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 6, 1967. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that Warner Avenue will be widened this August which could interfere with the operation. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-27 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Use Variance No. 67-27 shall become null and void on June 6, - 1968. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of Code Amendment No. 67-7. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer, Tom, Bazil NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO. 67-22 Applicant - Alvin H. He en o allow the construction of a building -previously destroyed by fire. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. The Applicant addressed the Commis- sion and explained the reasons for his request. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that the surrounding area is presently zoned for residential purposes; however, land use trends in the immediate area indicate that a complete re-evaluation of existing zoning is in order. The Commission held a lengthy discussion. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY TOM TO CONTINUE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-22 TO JUNE 202 19672 IN ORDER FOR THE PLANNING STAFF TO PREPARE A STUDY OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer, Tom, Bazil NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. -11- 6/6/67. Page No. 12 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuetday, June 6, 1967. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5972 EXTENSION OF TIME The Acting Secretary read a letter submitted by Jack Hall, engineer for the developer, request- ing a one year extension of time in which to record the final map. The Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Acting Secretary. Ron Foell, Security Fore Co:�,,pp., addressed the Commission and objected to condition #3 requir- ing all provisions of Article 998, Park and Recreational Facilities to be complied with. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAWSON AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5972 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. All conditions of the previous approved Tentative Map shall be complied with. 2. St. Augustine Avenue shall be 60 ft. wide between Newland Street and Antiqua Street. 3. All provisions of Article 998, Park and Recreational Facilities, shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer,- Tom, Bazil NOES: Miller. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. INFORMATION: The Planning Director informed the Commission that SB 876 was approved by the Senate and it will completely invalidate AB 1150 which the City has in- corporated into its Subdivision Ordinance. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LAWSON INSTRUCTING THE SECRETARY TO WRITE A LETTER TO ASSEMBLYMAN ROBERT H. BURME RECOMMENDING DEFEAT OF SB 876. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Lawson, Larkin, Royer, Tom, Bazil NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Richard A. Harlow Acting Secretary THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED. _ L4Thomas A. Worthy Chairman -12- 6/6/67. 1