Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-05-07MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. TUESDAY, MAY 7. 1968 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer; Miller, Lane COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Larkin MINUTES: On motion by Worthy and seconded)by Miller, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of March 5 and 19, 1968, were accepted as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5603 - Continued Use Variance No. 67-53 - Continued Subdivider: Deane Brothers To permit the following: 1. Reduction of street rights of way widths from 60' to 56' and modifi- cation of knuckles and cul-de-sacs as shown on T.-T. #5603. 2. Reduced minimum lot frontage on cul-de-sacs and knuckles as shown on typical plan. (Exhibit "B".) 3. Reduction of minimum front yard setbacks to "zero" on cul-de-sacs and knuckles and 10' on standard rectangular lots. 4. Reduction of minimum side yard set- backs to 10' on one side of a lot, provided 10' minimum side yard is maintained on the opposite side of the same lot. 5. Encroachment of architectural features into the,required 30 inch setback along a side yard where the setback -has been reduced to 10' with the provision that no archi- tectural features may project beyond any side property line. NOTE: Items 3, 4, and 5 are requested to permit a.dwellin.g and/or garage to 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May_7, 1968 Page No. 2- be7-com.-strutted on designated side property line. It is acknowledged that the variance pertaining to Items 3, 4 and 5 will not extend beyond the initial construction period. 6. Fencing: A. Construction of -an 8' high wall on the -rear, and both side lot lines and at the front of a lot at a minimum dis- tance of 10' back of face of curb, except on cul-de-sacs and knuckles where it is requested that,construction of an 8' high wall be permitted on the property line. (Exhibit B.) B. Where corner lots occur, construction of an 8' high wall at a minimum disr.. tance of 10" back of face of curb. 7. Required setbacks for garages to be mea- sured from the back of sidewalk. 8. The required 900 sq. ft. minimum yard area to be located on any portion of the lot, but subject to all other provisions of Sec. 9105.3.1. 9. Five foot wide sidgwalks to be constructed -adjacent to the back of curb within the street right of way. The-kating_.Secretary read a letter submitted by Voorheis-Trindle-Nelson, Inc., representing the applicant, requesting a two week continuance for Tentative Tract Map No. 5603 and Use Variance No. 67;�53. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO GRAN' THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT AND CONTINUE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5603 TO MAY 21, 1968. �. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom,.Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. The hearing was opened to the audience on Use Variance No. 67-53. There being no comment -the hearing was closed. A;MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY -TO CONTINUE USE VARIANCE NO. 67-53 TO MAY 21, 1968, AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ,ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONL CASE 90. 68'-2 ,- Continued Applicant = Newport Balboa Savings & Loan Change of zone fr4m-R-2 Two Family Residence District to R-3-Limited Multiple Family Residence District. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission this case wasccont'inued from the previous meeting to allow time for the applicant to -investigate the possibility of forming an assess- ment district for water facilities and to allow time for a proposed Fare Department .Ordinance restricting-cohstruction�of dwellings in areas not having sufficient fire flow to be adopted. -2- 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page 3 Bill Hartge, Deputy Director of Public Works addressed the Commission and stated his department mailed out notices to install water lines in the area but'did not receive any response. Chief Spickard addressed the Commission and said the ordinance pertaining to sufficient fire flow in new areas will be adopted soon. The hearing was opened -to the audience. Dennis Harwood, attorney for the applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the request. hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68-2 There being no other comment, the A Resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case No. 68-2 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM: AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 68-2 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 68-2 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. An R-3 zone will create a logical transition between the commercial zone on the west side of Cameron Street and the R-2 zone abutting the subject property on the east. 2. The property is master planned for medium density development which is an integrated R-2 and R-3 use. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE RESOLUTION -WAS -ADOPTED. AREA VARIANCE NO. 67-74 - Continued Applicant - Groth Chevrolet To allow storage an6/or display of automobiles within the front 50 feet setback area in the C-4 Highway Commercial District. The -Acting Secretary informed the Commission that this application was continued to allow the applicant time to consult with a landscape architect in order to design a plan for landscaping the front of his property. Hr. Harlow stated this was prompted by the ordinance regulating storage of merchandise within the required setback. The hearing was opened to the audience. Jack Groth, applicant, addressed the Commission and submitted plans depicting the landscaping. Mr. Groth requested that he be allowed to install bumper logs in lieu of the required six inch curb. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A lengthy discussion was held by the Commission. -3- 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 4 (Area Variance No. 67-74 Cont) A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROYER AND SECONDED BY TOM TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO. 67-74 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The area shall be landscaped per plans submitted with radius cut-off at Beach Blvd. and Taylor Avenue. 2. A six inch curb shall be installed in accordance with Article 979. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy; Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin, THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-12 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 5841 SUBDIVIDER: Fashion Homes, Inc. To permit the following: 1. 50' right-of-way streets as indicated in T.T. #5841. 2. 10' minimum front yard setbacks for fences not over 6' in height, for garages with side -on -to -street approach and for other portions of a residence. (Front setback for garages entered directly from the street to be 22 feet minimum.) 3. 10' minimum rear yard setback on irregular shaped lots, providing an average rear yard depth of 20 feet is maintained. On other lots 10' minimum rear yard setback for a portion of a house provided the remaining rear yard has 900 sq. ft. area with minimum rear yard depth being 20 feet., and 4. Every 6 consecutive lots to average 60 feet in width (at a 20' setback from front property line) with an average 6,000 sq. ft. of lot area for said 6 consecutive lots. (The minimum rectilinear lot shall not be less than 50 feet in width with 5,000 sq. ft. of lot area.) The Acting Secretary stated that this item was continued from a previous meeting to allow time for the City Council to make a decision on the proposed zoning for the southwest corner of Atlanta Avenue and Brookhurst Street. Mr. Harlow stated said zone change was denied. A new map reflecting the change was submitted by the applicant. The Staff Report and the Subdivision Committee Report were read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Ron Wells, Voorheis-Trindle-Nelson, Inc., representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and objected to new street widths. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. Discussion followed. 5/7/68 -4- Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 5 (Conditional Exception No. 68-12 cont) A MOTION WAS MADE BY LAN3 AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-12 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The minimum front yard shall be 10 feet except the minimum front yard for garages entered directly from the street shall be 22 feet. This condition of approval is not general in nature and a precise plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any building permits. Said plan shall delineate the house location on each lot. 2. The minimum lot frontage shall not be less than 50 feet wide with 5000 sq. ft. of lot area. An average lot width of 60 feet of frontage with 6000 sq. ft. of lot area shall be provided for each six contiguous lots in a block. 3. The homes constructed on these lots shall be substantially the same as the models for the existing subdivision. 4. Strathmoor Lane shall be 52 feet wide. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This request is basically in compliance with the previously approved map. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROYER AND SECONDED BY LANE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5841 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The Revised Study of the Tentative Map received April 25, 1968, shall be the approved layout. 2. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be null and void unless C.E. #68-12 is approved by —the City Council. 3. All utilities shall be installed underground. 4. All "Standard Conditions of Approval" for tentative tracts that are applicable shall be complied with. 5. Strathmoor Lane shall be 52 feet wide. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. 5/7/68 -5- Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 6 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-22 - Continued Applicant - Paul Patton To permit home care for five non - ambulatory, crib age, exceptional (mentally retarded) children. The Acting Secretary stated a study session was held in order to discuss this matter. The hearing was opened to the audience. Larry Smith, 19622 Canberra Lane, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and opposed the request on grounds that it is a business which would be conducted in the R-1 zone. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. A lengthy discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-22 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Conditional Exception No. 68-22 shall comply with the proposed code amendment pertaining to child care in the R-1 District when enacted. 2• No more than 4 non -ambulatory, crib age children shall be cared for on the premises. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This request will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood and it is a good place to care for non -ambulatory children. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 68-3 Master Plan Amendment - Study Area III proposes to consider amendments to the area bounded by Bolsa Chica Street, Heil Avenue, Graham Street and Warner Avenue. The Acting Secretary made a presenta- tion of three alternate proposals for the Master Plan of Land Use - Study Area III. The hearing was opened to the audience. W. 0. Martin, Bolsa Chica Home Owners Association, 16421 Eagle Lane, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and was opposed to the expansion of the existing airport. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A lengthy discussion was held by the Commission. 5/7/68 M Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 7 (Master Plan Amendment No. 68-3 cont) A MOTION WAS MADE BY LANE AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO TABLE THE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 68-3 - STUDY AREA III INDEFINITELY. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. A FURTHER MOTION WAS MADE BY LAND AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO INSTRUCT THE STAFF TO PREPARE A CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FLEXIBILITY IN DENSITIES IN THE R ZONE. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 68-9 - Continued Applicant - Hideo Yabuki Change'of zone from R-1 Single Family Residence District to R-3 Limited �- Multiple Family Residence District. The hearing was opened to the audience., Raymond Levanis, architect.,representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the proposal. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO -CONTINUE ZONE CASE NO. 68-9 TO MAY 217 1968 WITH THE CONSENT OF THE APPLICANT AND TO FURTHER STUDY THE REQUESI. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-23 - Qontinued Applicant - Robert C. Curr:y' To permit a retail nursery in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Jack Wheelhouse, 5032 E. Pearce Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the request. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROYER AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-23 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 5/7/68 -7- Minutes: H.B. Planning'Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 8 (Conditional Exception No. 68-23 cont) 1. Pearce Avenue shall be dedicated to City Standards. 2. Bolsa Chica Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City Standards. Improvements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights and fire hydrants. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of.Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel is developed. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel is developed. 5. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property -shall participate in the local drainage assess- ment district at the time said parcel is developed. 7. All utilities shall be installed underground. 8. A 6 foot high fence shall be constructed along the south and east property lines, except within the. -front 15 feet on Bolsa Chica Street and Pearce Avenue in which case the fence height shall be 316 feet. 9. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 10. Conditional Exception No. 68-23 shall become null and void on May 1, 1973, at which time the applicant may apply for a new Conditional.Exception. AND FOR THE'FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The land is not being used at this time due to the airport. 2. Approval of this request will help develop the area. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 68-12 A-Drlicant - The Rutherford Com Change of zone from 0-2 Community Business District to R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. There being no comment, the hearing was closed. 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 9 - RESOLUTION NO. 68-12 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case No. 68-12 to the: City Council. - A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLER 'TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 68-12 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 68-12 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS 1. A condition of approval for Use Variance No. 67-60-required that the applicant submit a petition to rezone the property to R-3 zone. 2. This request will have the zoning conform to the future use of the property. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy-,, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE RESOLUTION-WAS.ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO. 68-13 Alpplicant - Huntington Beach Company Change of zone from Rl-0 to ,Rl, R1-0 to R1-021 R4iO to R47Ol,. R5-0 to R5-01. The Acting Secretary read the.Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience. William Wren,.representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the proposal. hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68-13 There being no other comment, the A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 68-13 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 68-13 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 68-13 TO THE CITY COUNCIL,FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONn: 1. This request will allow development of the subdivision and future residential uses in the area to exist in harmony and be compatible with the existing oil operations. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy,'Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE RESOLUTION WAS,ADOETED. -9- 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 10 ZONE CASE NO. 68-14 Applicant - Chrysler Realty Corp. Change of zone from C-2 Community Business District to R-3 Limited, Multiple Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. There being no comment the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68-14 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 68-14 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 68-14 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 68-14 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The Master Plan of Land Use has the property designated for high density residential development. 2. The subject request is in conformance with the Master Plan of Land Use. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO. 68-15 Applicant - Patrick Moran Acting Secretary. The Staff Report was read by the The hearing was opened to the audience. There being no comment the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68-15 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 68-15 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROYER AND SECONDED BY TOM TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 68-15 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 68-15 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 5/7/68 -10- Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 11 1. The subject property is surroundbd:on the north, south and east by property zoned R-5 and the property across the street is zoned C-2; thus creating an island of R-2 zone in an established R-5 area. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-25 Applicant - Standard Oil Company Acting Secretary. To permit replacement of regional - office building in the M2-0 Industrial District with oil production. The Staff Report was read by the The hearing was opened to the audience. J. D. Bertino, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and requested continuance to allow time to study the suggested conditions 6f approval. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-25 TO MAY 21, 1968, AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy,, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-26 Applicant - Richard J. Krekemeyer To permit a day school nursery in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Edward Hunt, 5391 Old Pirate Lane, addressed the Commission and submitted a petition signed by 18 property owners opposing the request. The following property owners addressed the Commission and objected to the proposal: Robert Runyard, 5351 Old Pirate _ Lane, Dr. Rosenblatt, 16707 Graham Street and Gail M. Son. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed. The applicant's reasons for the request were as follows: 1. The day school.nursery is desirable to locate this school away from surroundings such as oil wells, empty parking lots, buty intersections and gas stations. 2. The children will be confined within a six foot redwood fence which would improve the appearance of the property. -11 -5/7/68 M-nut,es: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 12 (Conditional Exception No. 68-26 cont) 3. Location of'this school in this particular area would provide the surrounding community_ with true _ only school of this --kind. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO DENY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-26 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:' 1. The applicant failed --to show sufficient hardship. 2. This type'of use is not a permitted use in the R-1 zone. ROLL GALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-10 - APPEAL Applicant - Deane Brothers To allow a partially enclosed patio structure to be constructed six feet from the rear property line in deviar"'. tion to the required 10 foot rear yard setback. The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. _ The hearing was opened to'the audience. James Rogers, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and submitted various photographs of the subject property. He further stated his reasons for the request. Mr. Glenn Schlegel, adjacent property owner, addressed the Commission and submitted a petition signed by four adjacent'property owners endorsing the request. nearing was closed. There being no othercomment, the A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-10 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. Only a corner of the structure is in violation of the Code. 2. If the developer can satisfy the structural -requirements of the Building Department, the request should be approved. 3. The developer has a good reputation in the City, indicating he did not intentionally violate any City Requirements. 4. Granting of this request will not set a precedent in any way. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Tom, Miller,'Worthy NOES: Bazil, Royer, Lane ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY. -12- - 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May'7, 1968 Page No. 13 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LANE AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO DENY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-10 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: _ 1. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code does not permit this type of structure. ROLL CALL VOTE; AYES: Lane, Boyer, Bazil NOES: Tom, worthy, Miller ABSENT. Larkin THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY; THEREFORE, THIS CASE WAS AUTOMATICALLY CONTINUED TO MAY 21, 1968. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-27 Applicant'- Leonard Lindborg� Acting Secretary. - To permit the following: (1) Garages to be setback 19rz feet in deviation to the required 22 feet; (2) Front yard setback of 7r2 feet in deviation to the required 10 feet; and (3) Garages to take direct access from arterial highway. The Staff Report was read by the The hearing was opened to the audience. The applicant addressed the Commission and btated his reasons for the request.' There being no"othe-,,•comment-, the hearing was closed. Commissioner Tom suggested that the Commission consider reduction of setback requirements to allow development of this type of lot. Discussion was held. ' , A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM -,AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 68-27 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. 1. Garages shall be setback 22 feet from the front property line. 2. 14th Street shall be dedicated to City Standards. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON,:,. 1. There are several lots in the area taking access from 14th Street. Building permits for such access were issued prior to October 1964. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Tom, Miller, Worthy NOES: Zane, Bazil, Royer. ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY; THEREFORE, THE CASE WAS AUTOMATICALLY CONTINUED TO MAY 21, 1968. 5/7/68 -13- Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tihesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 14 - A FURTHER,MOTION-WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO INSTRUCT THE STAFF TO STUDY THE SUBJECT AREA FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES IN THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES:- Worthy, Bazil,, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: 'Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE.CASE NO. 68-16 Appj bant - The Colwell Company Change of zone from_1R-2 Two FamilylResi'fence--D� : -R=1 Single Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by -the Acting Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. There being no comment the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68-16 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No. 68-16 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 68-16 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO.'68-16 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. A condition of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5562 required that the applicant submit an application to r z,one the property to R-1. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer,,Miller, Lane NOES : , , None ABSENT: Larkin THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. SITE PLAN NO. 68-2 Applicant - Ed'and Renee Solomon To allow a cocktail lounge and" ` restaurant in. the C-4 Highway Commercial District.• The Staff Report was read by the Acting Secretary. r The hearing was opened to the audience. There being no comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY,TOM,AND SECONDED' BY WORTHY TO APPROVE SITE PLAN NO. 68-2 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The proposed cocktail lounge and restaurant is within,.an- . existing shopping center and will be compatible with the surrounding uses. -14- 5/7/68. Minutes:, H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 15 (Site Plan No. 68-2 cont) 2. The Police Department has reviewed the request and does not have any objections to this use. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. CODE AMENDMENT N0. - 68-4 Proposed Code Amendment which will allow home occupations in trailer -parks. The Commission reviewed the proposed amendment. A NOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY -TO RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF CODE AMENDMENT NO. 68-4 BY THE CITY COUNCIL. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: 'Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT NO. 68-5 Pertaining to Site Plans Procedure. Said amendment proposes to change the filin fee to $10.00 and amend the public hearing procedure for ;Site lan applications. The Commission reviewed said amendment. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY ROYER TO RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF CODE AMENDMENT NO. 68-5 BY ,THE CITY ' COUNCIL. ROLL CALL 'VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION:.CARRIED. INFORMATION: The Acting Secretary informed the Commission there will be a joint meeting with the City Council, ULI and the,Planning Commission on May 16, 1968, at 7:00 P.M. concerning the Mid -Beach Policy Plan. DISCUSSION: Mr. Dan Gillis addressed the Commission and discussed the alteration and enlargement to the existing commercial building located at 201 Main Street. -15- 5/7/68 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, May 7, 1968 Page No. 16 The Commission reviewed the request and the plans as to location, design, color and general archi- tecture. The Commission also requested that the City Council consider parking deficiencies in the downtown area and provide an incentive for future development. It also noted this could best be accomplished through the formation'of a parking district such as that provided for in the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 or by a method where developers who are unable to provide the required off-street parking, would deposit money with the City for acquisition of off-street parking facilities. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE REMODELING OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ONLY AND NOT THE ADDITION. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. DISCUSSION: The Commission discussed the policy statement pertaining to variances on tentative tracts. ON MOTION BY LANE AND SECONDED BY ROYER, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE_CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH JUNE-1 1968 AS THE DATE AFTER WHICH NO FURTHER CONSIDERATION WORD BE GIVEN TO SUBDIVIDERS REQUESTING VARIANCES ON TENTATIVE TRACTS WHICH COMPLY WITH THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED POLICY STATEMENT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Worthy, Bazil, Tom, Royer, Miller, Lane NOES: None _ABSENT: Larkin THE MOTION CARRIED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED TO MAY 16, 1968 AT 7:00 FOR JOINT MEETING WITH ULI, 6SC AND CITY COUNCIL. g. A.- Reynolds Robert D. Bazil .Secretary Chairman 5/7/68 -16-