Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-02-03MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1970 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Slates, Tom, Miller, Duke None NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. MINUTES: On motion by o tze Huntington Beach and November 4, 1969, w by the Secretary. ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED: Tom and seconded by Porter, the Minutes Planning Commission of October 14, 21, ere accepted as transcribed and mailed ZONE CASE NO 69-34 Change of zone from RI-0 Applicant - Huntington Beach Company Single Family Residence District combined with oil production to RI Single Family Resi- dence District and RI-02 Single Family Residence District - Com bining Oil District. Located north of Palm Avenue and west of Golden West Street. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that Zone Case No 69-34 should be continued to May 5, 1970, to allow time for changes in the oil ordinance to become effective. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOKOR AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE ZONE CASE NO 69-34 TO MAY 5, 1970, WITH THE APPLICANT'S CONSENT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Tom, Miller, Duke, Slates NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 70-1 Change of zone from RA Residential Agri - RESOLUTION OF INTENT cultural District, RA-0 Residential Agri- cultural District combined with oil production, RI Single Fam- ily Residence District, R5 Office -Professional District and MI Light Industrial District to CF-R Community Facilities -Recrea- tional District. The property consists of 147 acres of land, located near the northeast, southeast andsouthwest corners of Talbert Avenue and Golden West Street and is known as Phase I of the Central City Park. The Acting Secretary informed the Commis- sion that such zone case should be withdrawn, since the City Attorney's revised version of Code Amendment No. 70-1, which will establish a Community Facilities District will satisfy the intent of the City and the concern the property owners have with respect to Zone Case No. 70-1. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOKOR AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO WITHDRAW ZONE CASE NO. 70-1 - RESOLUTION OF INTENT AS PER STAFF°S,RECOMMENDATION. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Slates, Tom,Miller, Duke NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. -1- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 2 MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 70-3 An Amendment to the Master Plan of LandUse tor a po7tio_n7_oT77tudy Area 111. Generally bounded by Edinger Avenue on the north, Algonquin Street on the east, Warner Avenue on the south and Pacific Coast Highway on the west. The area is known as Huntington Harbour Development, The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that this item should be continued to February 17, 1970, because the next four items on the agenda which are in conjunction with said Master Plan will be continued to that date, A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 70-3 TO FEBRUARY 17, 1970. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Tom, Miller, Duke, Slates NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED, ZONE CASE NO. 69-41 A licant - Huntin ton Harbour Corp. Change of zone from Rl Single Family Residence District to R3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District, located southwest of the western end of Edinger Avenue and southeasterly of and opposite the Orange County Sunset Aquatic Regional Parke ZONE CASE NO. 69-42 Applicant - Huntin&ton�Harbour Corp. Change of zone from Rl Single Family Residence'District to R2 Two Family Residence District, located northwest of the intersection of Saybrook Lane and Humboldt Drive. ZONF�, CASE NO. 69-43 Applicant - Huntin ton Harbour Corp. Change of zone from Rl Single Family Residence istrict to R2 Two Family Residence District, located on the south side of Edinger Avenue, approxi- mately 1925 feet west of Monterey Lane. ZONE CASE NO. 69-44 ARplicant - Huntin ton Harbour Corp). Change of zone from R1 Single mily Residence District to R2 Two Family Residence District, located southwest of the intersection of Saybrook Lane and Humboldt Drive, The Acting Secretary read a letter submitted by Huntington Harbour Corporation, requesting continuance on Zone Cases No. 69-41, 69-42, 69-43, 69-44, to February 17, 1970. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE ZONE CASES NO. 69-419 69-42, 69-439 69-449 TO FEBRUARY 17, 1970, AT APPLICANTS REQUEST. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Tom, Miller, Duke, Slates NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 69-22 - Continued. Applicant - Gordon and Fa e Talbert Change of Zone from R5 Off- ice Pro a siona , R5-0 Ottice Pro essional combined with Oil and C-3 General Business District to R4 Multiple Family Residence District and C4 Highway Commercial District with.a 50 ft. setback from ultimate right-of-way, located southwest corner of Atlanta Avenue and Beach Boulevard. -2- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 3 The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that this zone case was originally heard at their August 5, 1969 meeting at which time it was continued to the February 3, 1970 meeting. Mr. Harlow stated that later on the agenda the Plan- ning Commission will consider a request to construct a 255 space mobilehome park on the same property. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mark Botich, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and indicated that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue this re- que:st. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOKOR AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO DENY ZONE CASE NO. 69-22 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This is not a proper use for the subject property, because of recent planning programs and ownership of the property has changed. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter Slates, Tom, Miller, Duke NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 69-35 - Continued Applicant - John MacLeod Change of zone from R5 Office-Pro- essionaDistrict an 2 Two Family Residence District, to R3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District, located on the south side of Detroit Avenue and west of the extension of Delaware Street. Mark Botich, representing the applicant, ad- dressed the Commission and stated that he has been working with the Department of Public Works regardingathe=alignment'of"Dela- ware Street. Bill Hartge, City Engineer, informed the Commis- sion that the Department of Public Works has been working on said alignment which will be submitted to the Commission for consideration at their March 3, 1970, meeting; therefore, con- tinuance of Zone Case No. 69-35 to the March 3, 1970, meeting would be in order. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY PORTER TO CONTINUE ZONE CASE NO. 69-35 TO MARCH 3, 1970, IN ORDER TO CONSIDER A PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR DELAWARE STREET. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Tom, Miller, Duke, Slates, NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 69-36 - Continued Applicant - Standard -Pacific Corp. Change of zone to R5 Office- ro essiona istrict, located between Garfield Avenue and Ellis Avenue, east to the extension of Newland Street. The hearing was opened to the audience. -3- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 4 Tom Shelton, representing one of the pro- perty owners, 17612 Beach Boulevard, Huntington Beach, addres- sed the Commission and reviewed a soils report pertaining to the subject property. Bill Hartge, City Engineer, concurred with Mr. Shelton's soils report and recommended that no public streets be constructed within the proposed development, nor should the sewer and wafer lines which would have to be placed in the streets be dedicated to the public. Mr. Hartge further discus- sed peat conditions in the area. Mel Harper, 2649 South Batson, Rolling Heights, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the re- zoning. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. It was the consensus of the Commission to con- tinue Zone Case No. 69-36 to allow time for the property owner to investigate alternates for development of this property. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DUKE AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO CONTINUE ZONE CASE NO. 69-36 TO MARCH 31 1970, TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER TO INVESTIGATE ALTERNATES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Duk6,,Porter, Miller, Bazil NOES: Tom, Slates, Bokor ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 69-45 Applicant - P B S Corp. Change of zone from RA-0 Residential Agricultural istrict combined with oil production to Rl Single Family Residence District, located northwest corner of Atlanta Avenue and Bushard Street. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOKOR AND SECONDED BY PORTER TO APPROVE ZONE CASE NO. 69-45 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. A condition of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 6954 re- quired the applicant to submit a zone change application to re- zone this property to R-1. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter Slates, Tom, Miller, Duke NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 70-3 Applicant - Sha ell Industries Inc. Change of zone from RA Residential gricu tura District to Rl Single Family Resi- dence District, located southeast corner of Bushard Street and Adams Avenue. The hearing was opened to the audience, there, being no comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY BOKOR TO APPROVE ZONE CASE NO. 70-3 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: -4- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 5 1. A condition of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 6807 re- quired the applicant to submit a zone change application to re- zone this property to R-1. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Slates, Tom, Miller, Duke NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 7071 Applicant - W.M. Elliott Jr. To, permit the reactivation of an of we which as bee idle for more than 6 months, located north side of Utica Avenue, approximately 100 feet east of Dela- ware Street in the R2 Two Family Residence District. A video tape of the subject property and sur- rounding area was shown. A letter, submitted by Herbert Day, Oil Field Superintendent, stating that this oil well meets all requirements of the present Huntington Beach Oil Code was presented to the Planning Commission. The hearing was opened to the audience. R.W. Shull, 1704 Coral Place, Seal Beach, a property owner to the south, addressed the Commission and oppo- sed the request. W.M. Elliott, Applicant, stated that he feels the oil well has some potential and that he did not have the op- portunity to re -activate this well prior to this time. He also stated that he was unaware of the non -conforming section of the Huntington Beach Code. closed. There being no other eomment the hearing was Commission discussion was held. Commissioner Bazil stated that the 110" de- signation was taken off the subject property, therefore, this request is contrary to City's policy which is for clean up of the oil fields. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOKOR AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-1 UPON THE FOL- LOWING CONDITIONS: a) The property shall be maintained in a neat, clean and orderly manner. b) All provisions of the Huntington Beach Oil Code and Fire Code shall be complied with.. c) A concrete block wall shall be installed to Fire De- partment standards around the existing tanks for aes- thetic and safety reasons. d) The applicant shall secure all necessary permits as required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. e) The conditional exception shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission during the month of September 1970, for the purpose of establishing additional con- ditions of approval that are consistent with city or- dinances effective at.that time; or, such conditional exception shall become null and void on October 1, 1970. -5- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 6 f) The applicant shall screen the site with 5*-gallon my- oporum trees arranged in such manner so as to adequate- ly screen the oil well and tanks from view. A plan showing the placement of such trees shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: a) Properties in the immediate vicinity are of an oil- field nature, b) There are no. residences nearby and this use is com- patible with the area. c) The subject property within the area is taken for the interchange of Routes 1 and 39 Freeways which will be constructed within the next 8 to 10 years. d) The action of the Planning Commission was sustained by the City Council after the matter was considered on an appeal. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bokor, Miller, Slates NOES: Bazil, Tom, Porter, Duke ABSENT: None THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO DENY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-1 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. Reactivation of said oil well will infringe on surrounding property rights. 2. Said request is contrary to City's policy for cleaning up the oil fields. 3. Said oil well is non -conforming. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Porter, Duke, Tom NOES: Miller, Slates, Bokor ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-3 Applicant - St. Francis School To permit the construction of a metal storage building 30 feet by 102 feet, in conjunction with an existing school in the R1 Single Family Residence Dis- trict, located northeast corner of Indianapolis Avenue and Mag- nolia Street. A video tape of the subject property and proposed location of the building was shown. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mrs. Wanda Dugan, 20385 Fee Lane, and Mr. P.C. McMahan, 9191 Strathcona Drive, addressed the Commission. and opposed the request because of .the. type of,proposed..struc- ture. Father Ronald, representing the St. Francis School, addressed the Commission and stated that the church needs this storage building, as two classrooms are beipg used for stor- age. Father Ronald further stated that the proposed structure will be compatible in color with the existing buildings. -6- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 7 closed. There being no other comment the hearing was Commission discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY TOM TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-3 UPON THE FOLLOW- ING CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be similar in type and design to the existing church and school facility. 2, The structure shall be designed and landscaped so as to be compatible with other buildings within the church facility. 3. A 30 ft. setback shall be provided from the abutting single family area. 4. A Division of Land application, separating the subject property from the property to the south to make such area a permanent part of the church and school property, shall be filed with the City and recorded prior to fram- ing inspection of the structure. 5. -Final determination as to compliance with conditions 1 through 3 shall be made by the Board of Zoning Adjust- ments prior to issuance of building permits. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Slates, Tom, Miller, Duke NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. USEPERMIT NO. 69-69 - (Referred by Board of Zoning Adjustments) Applicant - American Mobile Home Corp. To permit the construc- tion ot a 255 space mobile home park on approximately 31,34 acres of land, located southwest corner of Atlanta Avenue and Beach Boulevard in the R5 Office -Professional District and the R5 Of- fice -Professional District combined with oil production. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that the staff recommends continuance until May 19, 1970, be- cause it will be approximately 5 months before a report outlin- ing an economic analysis of this area is available. If the con- tintuance is not agreed to, the staff recommends denial. The -hearing was opened to the audience. Clark Leonard, Civil Engineer, addressed the Commission and stated that he feels the proposed plan conforms with existing zoning requirements and the proposed trailer park will solve a drainage problem and upgrade the area. Mr. Leonard also stated that a denial will be discriminatory and will deprive them of a right granted to abutting property owners. Phil Walsh, representing the American Mobile Home Corp., esplained the re- quest. Mr. Walsh reviewed statistics pertaining to the number of people per trailer, cost of the average home and average income of persons who will live within the subject park. He also stated that in addition to providing a place for people to live, a mo- bile home.park:serves as a land bank until the highest and best use of the property can be realized. To accomplish this, Mr. Walsh stated that their company would submit to architectural -control. closed. There being.no other comment the hearing was -7--2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 8 The Commission held a discussion. A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE USE PERMIT NO. 69-69 TO MAY 192 1970, TO ALLOW TIME FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOCIA- TION TO BE SUBMITTED. THIS MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN BECAUSE THE APPLI- CANT REQUESTED THAT A DECISION FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL BE MADE. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE USE PERMIT NO. 69-69 IN ORDER TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF THE COMMIS- SION'S AUTHORITY TO DENY THE REQUEST. THE MOTION WAS LOST FOR LACK OF SECOND. A FURTHER MOTION WAS MADE BY DUKE AND SECOND- ED BY TOM TO DENY USE PERMIT NO. 69-69 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The Planning Commission had originally suggested contin- uance of the matter until May 19, 1970; however, the ap- plicant has requested that a decision be made at this time, 2. Additional time was necessary, so as to review the data to be supplied by Economic Research Associates, as to the economic potential of the area and inasmuch as a decision has been requested, the Planning Commission has insufficient data upon which to base their decision, 3. Mobilehome Park is inconsistent with the "Top -of -the - Pier" Development Plan because mobilehome parks have not been included as proposed uses within such are,4.' ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter, Slates, Tom,Duke NOES: Miller ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO. 69-70 (Referred by the Board of Zoning Adjustments) A2plicant - The Handyman of California To permit the construction ot a Handyman hardware store on approximately 6.2 acres of land, located southeast corner of Adpms Avenue and Brookhurst Street in the C2 Community Business District, DIVISION OF LAND NO. 69-43 (Continued) Applicant - Roy K. Sakioka To permit the division of a parcel of land into two separate parcels, located southeast corner of Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street, USE PERMIT NO. 70-3 (Referred by the Board of Zoning Adjustments) In_Con3unction with DIVISION OF LAND NO. 70-1 (Referred by the Board of Zoning Ad- justments) AZplicant - Beacon Bay Enterprises, Inc. To permit the construc- tion o ,a u .service car wash and dispensing of gasoline. Loca- ted on the southeast intersection of Brookhurst St. and Adams Ave- nue in the C2 Community.Business District. USE PERMIT NO. 70-4 (Referred by the Board of Zoning Adjustments) Applicant - Atlantic Richfield Company To permit the construct- ion of a gasoline service station at the southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue in the C2 Community Business District, located on the southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue, The Chairman read a letter submitted by the -8- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 9 Meredith Gardens Homeowners Association, Inc., requesting that all four items be considered together and that all parties con- cerned be allowed to speak in favor or against. Mr. Slates sta- ted that the applicants will present their cases individually. The hearing was opened to the audience on Use Permit No. 69-70, Division of Land No. 69-43, Use Permit No. 70-3 and Use Permit No. 70-4. James DeChaine, Asst. City Manager, Newport Beach, addressed the Commission and introduced each of the ap- plicants or their representative on these five items. Mr. DeChaine commended the City of Huntington Beach on their action for controlled commercial development. P.D. Lippert, representing the Atlantic Richfield Corp., on Use Permit No. 70-4, addressed the Commis- sion and submitted a photograph of the proposed service station. Mr. Lippert stated that he was advised by the Design Review Board that the type of service station shown on the photograph would be acceptable at any location in the city other than along the beach. J.M. Shea, representing Beacon Bay Enterprises, Inc., explained the design of the structure and materials to be used for the proposed car wash required by Use Permit No. 70-3. Mr. Shea stated that this structure will be compatible in both de- sign and materials used within the overall project. He also stated that this structure is the same as the car wash proposed for construction within the Newport Shopping Center. Bill Hartge, City Engineer, addressed the Commission and discussed curb cuts, future median brakes and the traffic flow within the proposed development. J.P. Pollock, representing the Handyman Company, stated that all merchandise will be stored inside of the building except the nursery stock. Mr. Pollock also stated that the trash collection will be screened from view by a 6 ft. high wall. He further added that the elevation of the sides and rear of the building will be essentially the same as the front elevation: Dean Royce, realtor, representing Mr. Sakioka, presented plans showing a possible building layout for Parcel #2, stating that his client is looking for compatible uses. Mr. Royce stated that this plan depicted one of many possibilities for de- velopment. Owen Kupfer, representing Mr. Sakioka, infor- med the Commission that the applicant does not have plans for Parcel #2 at this time. Mr. Kupfer stated that Mr. Sakioka is a farmer, not a developer, and that he is open to suggestions on the configuration of the parcels if it will result in a better development. Persons speaking in opposition of Use Permit No. 69-70, Division of Land No. 69-43, Use Permit No. 70-3, Di- vision of Land No. 70-1 and Use Permit No. 70-4 were as follows: Edward Kerins, representing the Meredith Gardens Homeowners As- sociation, stated that the proposed use would be detrimental to the surrounding area and to the City as a whole. He discussed commercial development in the area and pointed out situations that have developed when property is divided without regard to future use of the vacant parcels. He specifically-poirited out the commercial development,_on the northwest corner- of Adams Ave- nue and Magnolia Street.. Mr., Kerins 'fiirther stated that if a division of land is granted to Mr. Sakioka, it will form an odd piece of land which would be hard to develop with commercial -9- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 3, 1970 Page 10 structures. Mr. Kerins suggested that the Commission take their time so as to have the city develop in a proper manner. He stat- ed that the Commission has three alternatives with regard to de- velopMent of this corner. 1. The Commission can deny all applications before them. 2. The Commission can inform Mr. Sakioka that they will not accept any development on this property less than total de- velopment so as to provide a totally coordinated development. 3. The Commission may, by resolution of intent rezone this pro- perty R1 because the master plan of land use only calls for commercial development on three corners of this intersection and the city recently rezoned the soughwest corner C4 caus- ing a surplus of commercial zoning. Ben Lawnderey, representing the Huntington Bay Homeowners Association, stated that he was concerned with traffic problems. He felt that there were too many curb cuts and that a better traffic circulation plan should be established. Dave Shulte, past president of Meredith Gardens Homeowners Asso- ciation, stated that if this project is approved it will cause a hodge podge development and potential blight. Ted Denney, Tan- bark, was opposed to the fact that development of Parcel #2 was unknown. CHAIRMAN SLATES: Chairman Slates excused himself from further participation at 10:30 P.M. Vice -Chairman Tom assumed duties as Chair- man. Each applicant then made a rebuttal to the: opposition. Robert Lawson, Architect, representing Beacon Bay Enterprises, Inc., stated that the proposed car wash facili- ty will only have one point of access to Adams Avenue. Mr. Phil Anshultz, Coldwell Banker Company, stated that this is an existing commercial corner and as such they must seek commercial uses. He further stated that the car wash will be properly handled. Mr. Pollock, representing the Handyman of Cal- ifornia, stated that their business is based on the amount of homes in the area to be properly served and they will not rent equipment. There being no other comment the hearing was closed. Commissioner Bazil stated that he feels that the configuration of Parcel 2 on the property owned by Mr. Saki- oka will be difficult to develop commercially in the future. Commission discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOKOR AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE USE PERMIT NO. 69-70, DIVISION OF LAND 69-43 USE PERMIT NO 70-3, DIVISION OF LAND NO. 70-1 AND USE PERMIT NO. 70-4 TO FEBRUARY 17, 1970, TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE APPLICANT TO REARRANGE THE CONFIGURATION OF THE PARCELS ON THE SAKIOKA PRO- PERTY SO TO HAVE HANDYMAN INC., USE THE ENTIRE FRONTAGE ON ONE STREET THEREBY ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT TO OTHER PARCEL, AND TO CO- ORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTIRE CORNER. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Tom,Miller, Duke, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Slates -10- 2/3/70-PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, Februery 3, 1970 Page 11 THE MOTION CARRIED. CODE AMENDMENT NO. 69-3 OIL OEDINANCE Said Code Amendment proposes to amend Article - - Combining Oil District) by renumbering, reword- ing and adding various sections within such Article. Also, said amendment proposes to reword Section 9700 (n) Definitions. The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that the porposed revision to the oil ordinance will be referred to the Oil Committee for further discussion; therefore, a contin- uance of said item to March 17, 1970, is recommended. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECONDED BY TOM TO CON- TINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 69-3-OIL CODE ORDINANCE TO MARCH 1791970. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Porter Tom, Miller, Duke NOES: None ABSENT: Slates THE MOTION CARRIED. INFORMATION: The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that a joint meeting will be held with the City Council on February 19, 1970, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, concerning a dis- cussion on two proposed ordinances: 1) Community Facility Zone; and, 2) Civic District Suffix. COMMISSIONER B'AZIL: Commissioner Bazil stated that he was con- cerned with t e a undance of mobilehome parks in areas of the city, specifically the area south of Indianapolis Avenue, along Beach Boulevard. Mr. Bazil suggested that a letter be sent to the City Council opposing mobilehome parks in this area. It was the consensus of the Commission that steps be taken to eliminate this possibility. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS THE MEETING ADJOURNED. 0'4C� k� / L^'� Ken Reynolds, Secretary Chairman -11- 2/3/70-PC