HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-01-19MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Administrative Annex
523 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1972
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None
DIVISION OF LAND NO. 71-32 - Continued
To divide a legal parcel of land into
three separate parcels.
In Conjunction With
USE PERMIT NO. 71-65 -
Applicant: Pizza Hut
To permit the construction and opera-
tion of a Pizza Hut. The subject property is located on the
east side of Beach Blvd., northeast corner of Holland St. in
the C4 Highway Commercial District.
It was noted by the Board that a
development plan for total property had not been received.
Dave Kirchener, representing the
applicant, addressed the Board and requested a continuance of
these two items.
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND
SECONDED BY PALIN TO CONTINUE DIVISION OF LAND NO..71-32 AND
USE PERMIT NO. 71-65 TO JANUARY 26, 1972 TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE
APPLICANT TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland; Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-1 - Continued
Applicant: Donald P. Jones
To adjust the lot line of two adja-
cent legal parcels of land.
In Conjunction With
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-1
Applicant: Donald P. Jones
To permit zero rear yard setback on
a portion of a motorbike sales agency in lieu of the required
10 ft. rear yard setback. The subject property is located on
the west side of Beach Blvd., approximately 180 ft. north of
Utica_St. in the C2 Community Business District.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Don Jones, applicant, addressed the
Board and explained the request.
It was noted by the Acting Secretary
that an Administrative Review application would be required to
be filed to allow the use as the applicant had only requested a
reduction of the rear yard setback on Conditional Exception No.
72-1
Various recommendations were made to
the applicant with regard to the walls, etc. Zero rear yard
setback was discussed.
The applicant agreed to a continuance
of these items to allow time to file an Administrative Review
application.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
January 19, 1972
Page 2
There being no further com-
ment, the hearing was closed.
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND
AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO CONTINUE DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-1
AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-1 TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE APPLI-
CANT TO SUBMIT AN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION AND TO SUBMIT
REVISED PLOT PLANS.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Patin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 71-89 - Continued
Applicant: Joseph & Norma De Sues
To permit the operation of a
retail interior decorator shop business. The subject property
is located on the west side of Main St. between 6th and 7th Sts.
in the C3 General Business District.
It was noted by the Board that
the City Attorney's office had been contacted. Also, that the
commercial use was not the non -conforming use, therefore, no
abatement could be considered. However, the residential use
is.non-conforming but had not been abated. Access to the resi-
dence was discussed and compliance with the parking requirements.
A lengthy Board discussion
was held.
The applicant agreed to a
continuance.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND
AND SECONDED BY SPENCER TO CONTINUE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.
71-89 TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME FOR THE BOARD TO MEET WITH THE
CITY ATTORNEY TO DISCUSS THE NEW INFORMATION REVIEWED WITH THE
BOARD BY THE APPLICANT ON THE USE OF THE PROPERTY.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Patin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
It was the consensus of the
Board that a field trip should be made to review the use.
USE PERMIT NO. 71-66
Applicant: Charles J. Wilmot
To permit a'garage conversion
and the construction of a carport. The subject property is
located at 16561 Trudy Lane in the R1 Single Family Residence
District.
audience.
The hearing was opened to the
Charles Wilmot, applicant,
addressed the Board and explained the request.
It was noted that a field
trip had been made to the property to check the driveway loca-
tion and it was fine.
the hearing was closed.
There being no other comment,
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND
SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 71-66 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. All applicable conditions of Section 9106 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with.
-2- 1/19/72-BZA
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
January 19, 1972
Page 3
2. Design and materials as shown on photographs submitted
January 19, 1972.
AND FOR THE REASON:
1. The structure is compatible wi-:h existing structure and
the surrounding area.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-103
Applicant: Charles Geers
To permit a reduction in the required
landscaping of 5 ft. to a 3 ft. planting strip. The subject
property is located on the southwest corner of Adams Ave. and
Huntington St. in the C4 Highway Commercial District.
The hearing was opened to the
audience.
Mr. Geers, applicant, addressed the
Board and explained the request.
The applicant was advised that sup-
plementary documentation would be required before the appli-
cation could be acted on. Also, that the Conditional Exception
would have to state the request for a reduction in parking
for a service type commercial building and would have to be
readvertised.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed.
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND
SECONDED BY PALIN TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-103
TO FEBRUARY 2, 1972 TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO SUBMIT -
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATIONS AND REVISE PLANS AS NECESSARY.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-104
Applicant: Leonard 0. Lindborg
To allow a reduction in open space
dimension from the required 20 ft. to 10 ft. on lots 2, 4, 6,
81 149 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 in the Huntington Beach
17th St. Section. The subject property is located at 17th St.
(east) between Acacia and Pecan Aves. in the R2 Two Family
Residence District.
The hearing was opened to the
audience.
Lenny Lindborg, applicant, addressed
the Board and explained the request.
There being no other comment, the
hearing was closed.
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND
SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.
71-104 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. The design and layout of patio areas received January 12,
1972 shall be the approved layout for open space.
AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
-3- - 1/19/72
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
January. 19, 1972
Page 4
1. This layout affords better utilization of the open space
and a more desirable living environment for the persons
residing therein.
2. A code amendment has been approved by the Planning Com-
mission and City Council allowing this type of variation
within the open space areas.
3. This concept provides -open space that relates to each
unit.
ROLL CALL VOTE:—
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-2
Applicant: Leonard 0. Lindborg
To allow a 10 ft. and 12 ft.
minimum dimension on open space in lieu of the required 20 ft.
The subject property is located on the west side of 19th St.
and south of Palm Ave. in the R2 Two Family Residence.District.
The hearing was opened to
the audience.
Lenny Lindborg, applicant,
addressed the Board and explained the request.
There being no further com-
ment, the hearing was closed. ---
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN
AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.
72-2 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
I., The -design and layout of patio areas received January 12,
1972 shall be the approved layout for open space.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. This layout affords better utilization of the open space
and a more desirable living environment for the persons
residing therein.
2. A code amendment has been approved by the Planning Com-
mission and. City Council allowing this type of variation
within -the -open space areas.
3. This concept provides open space that relates to each
unit.
ROLL CAL_ L VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-3
Applicant: Leonard 0. Lindborg
To allow a 10 ft. and 12 ft.
minimum dimension on open space in lieu of the required_20 ft.
The subject property is located between Palm Ave. and Acacia
Ave. and between 20th St. and 21st St. in the R2 Two Family
Residence District.
Leonard 0. Lindborg, appli-
cant, addressed the Board and explained the request.
There being no further
comment, the hearing was closed.
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN
AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 72-3 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. The design and layout of patio areas received January 12,
1972 shall be the approved layout for open space.
-4- 1/19/72
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
January 19, 1972
Page 5
AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. This layout affords better utilization of the open
space and a more desirable living environment for
the persons residing therein.
2. A code amendment has been approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council allowing this type of
variation within the open space areas.
3. This concept provides open space that relates to
each unit.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-4
Applicant: Patti Walker Realty
To allow the continued use
of a nonconforming sign with an interior side yard
setback of 1 ft. in lieu of the required 26 ft. setback.
The subject property is located on the south side of
Warner Ave., west of Beach Blvd. in the C4 Highway Com-
mercial District.
The hearing was opened to
the audience.
Henry Chuba, J & B Sign Co.,
representing the applicant, addressed the Board and
explained the request. He explained to the Board that
this sign had been installed prior to issuance of.a
sign permit. Also that the sign had been increased
in size.
Signs on the adjacent pro-
perties were discussed.
There be:Ing no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
Board discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY'MCFARLAND
AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 72-4 TO JANUARY 26, 1972 TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE BOARD
AND APPLICANT TO SURVEY THE AREA AND DETERMINE THE -PRO-
PER LOCATION FOR THE SIGN.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: -McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-2
Applicant: Freeway Industrial Park
To divide a legal.parcel of
land into two separate legal parcels.
In Conjunction With
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-5
Applicant: Bob's Big Boy
To permit ornamental piers
to project 5 ft. 10 in. beyond the 25 ft. maximum
encroachment on Edinger Ave. and to permit the build-
ing to project 18 ft. beyond the 25 ft. maximum
encroachment on Gothard St,
In Conjunction With
USE PERMIT NO. 72-1
Applicant: Bob's Big Boy
To permit the construction
of a new restaurant. The subject property is located
on the north side of Edinger Ave., west side of
-5- 1/19/72-BZA
E
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
January 19, 1972
Page 6
Gothard St. in the C4 Highway Commercial District.
The hearing was opened ;to
the audience.
John Barringer, representing
Bob's Big Boy, addressed the Board and explained the request.
It was noted by the Board
that the plan had not been revised to show a proper setback
from Gothard St.
There being no further
comment, the hearing was closed.
The Board held a lengthy
discussion. It was the consensus of the Board that they
could not act on the application because of the excessive
encroachment.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN
AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO REFER DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-29
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-5 AND USE PERMIT NO. 72-1 TO
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 1, 1972 IN THE COUNCIL
CHAMBER AT 7:00 P.M. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. These applications are proper for this request but it is
beyond the scope of the Board to act on a variance of
this magnitude.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: McFarland, Spencer, Palin
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
MISCELLANEOUS:
A letter was received from E. F. Hartmann with regard to
traffic problems and insufficient parking located on the
north side of Warner Ave., approximately 1400 ft. west of
Goldenwest St. at the main Huntington Beach Post Office.
This letter was reviewed by the Board at the request of the
Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission. The letter
requested a revised layout for the parking at the main post
office on Warner Ave. It was the consensus of the Board
that because of additional parking along the side and to
the rear of the structure, the proposed layout submitted by
Mr. Hartmann was not acceptable and would create more pro-
blems than currently exist.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
1N C d)s
James W, Palln Datfiel W. McFarland
Acting Secretary Chairman
1/19/72-BZA