Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-10-11MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Administrative Annex 523 Main Street Huntington Beach, Calif. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER.11,1972 - 1:15 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Spencer, McFarland, Palin REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS FOR PUBLIC HEARING: USE PERMIT NO. 72-57 - Continued Applicant - Lanny E. Ludwick To permit the construction of eight. (8) apartment units pursuant to S. 9162.3.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property is located on the west side of Florida Street approximately 225 ft. north of Garfield Avenue in the R2 Medium Density Residential District. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Ludwick, applicant, addressed the Board and explained his request. The Board noted that the application had been con- tinued for revised plans. New plans were submitted along with a blow-up drawing and elevations. The Board reviewed fencing and the layout of the plans with the applicant and calculated the open space. There being no further comment the hearing was closed;. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND.SECONDED BY PALIN TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 72-57 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plot plan received October 11, 1972 as amended shall be the approved layout. 2. Florida Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. Im- provements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 10/11/72 BZA Page,2 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 5. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 7. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 10. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 11. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin. NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-85 - Continued Applicant - Harold D. McClard In Conjunction With DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-27 - Continued Applicant - Harold D. McClard To permit the construction of a real estate office with facilities for parking and to create two lots from two existing lots by re- adjustment of property lines. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Springdale Street and Bolsa Avenue in the C2 Community Business District. Mr. McClard, applicant, addressed the Board and submitted revised plans as requested at a previous meeting for the proposed dev- elopment on the parcel with orientation to the service station at the intersection. The Board reviewed the plan as submitted and requested that the applicant provide plans including the ultimate development and -2- 10/11/72 BZA Page 3 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 parking layout showing curb cuts, circulation, driveways and reciprocal easements, as the plans submitted for this review did not contain this information. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY SPENCER TO CONTINUE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 72-85 AND DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-27 TO OCTOBER 18, 1972 MEETING FOR REVISED PLOT PLANS. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO. 72-68 Applicant - C. Thomas Mallos In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 72-87 Applicant - C. Thomas Mallos To permit the construction of a 10 unit apartment complex pursuant to S. 9162.3.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and to permit the construction of carports for a proposed 10 unit apartment complex with zero side and rear yard setbacks in lieu of S. 9166.2, 9163.2.1 and 9165.3(c), of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property is located on the east side of 17th Street approximately 35 ft. from Huntington Avenue in the R2 Medium Density Residential District. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Mallos, applicant, addressed the Board and explained the request. The Board reviewed the open space, driveways, density and lot coverage with the applicant. Mr. Mallos then presented elevations for the project for review. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 72-68 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plot plan received September 15, 1972 shall be the approved layout. -3- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 4 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 2. 17th Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. Im- provements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntingtin Beach's water system. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The water, sewer and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 7. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 10. No structures other than those shown on the approved plot plan shall be constructed within the project. 11. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 12. Elevations shall be submitted to the Board of Zoning Ad- justments for approval action. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY SPENCER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 72-87 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall use maintenance :Free material along the side yard. 2. The height of subject building shall not exceed 9 ft. -4- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 5 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The proposal will eliminate a 5 ft. trash area, and will preclude vandalism. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. McFarland, Perlin ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-93 Applicant - So. Calif. Edison Co. To permit the construction, operation and maintenance of six combined cycle generating units at applicant's Huntington Beach Generating Station, pursuant to S. 9551 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Each unit consists of two gas turbines, two recovery steam generators and one steam turbine. The units are designed to use either natural gas or distallate for fuel. Also, as indicated on the Development Plans, construction of a shop and warehouse building of 40,000 sq. ft. Construction will be of concrete block with a height of 25 ft. The subject property is located on the northerly side of Pacific Coast Highway between Newland Street and Brookhurst Street. Mr. Bill Wedeslier, Paul Richardson, District Manager, So. Calif. Edison Company,,and several other representativeswere present. Mr. Richardson made a short presentation on the proposed ex- pansion, the type of generating units, the height of the proposed structure and appurtenances, the proposed landscape rendering and the revised plot plan as requested. The Board asked questions regarding the rendering and how the earth berm surrounding the facility would screen the equipment. Mr. Richardson stated that it is Edison Company's intent to cooperate with the city in meeting all landscaping requirements or desires of the city to completely screen the facility. It was noted by the Board that the revised plot plats did not delineate the total parking for the facility. It was pointed out that the fact sheet submitted with the application in- dicating there would be an additional 60 to 80 employees. The Board then indicated that as this information had not been delineated on the plans, the Board could only recommend that parking for the total facility conform to Article 979. Mr. Richardson stated that the additional information will be sub- mitted for Planning Commission review. The Board then discussed -5- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 6 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 the plot plan as it related to the earthen berm and proposed landscaping around the new facility and recommended that every attempt be made to carry this treatment along Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street around the existing facility. The Board further recommended to Edison Company that they submit a proposal on landscaping for Newland Street as a portion of the existing berm, landscaping and screening in the area would be removed by the required street improvements. The Board discussed the proposed lighting of the new facility and were informed that all elevated areas, walkways, etc., would meet requirements of the Occupational. Safety and Health Act, that the stacks would be lighted to moet Federal Aviation Administration requirements similar to the existing lighting as far as intensity is concerned, and that all lighting at ground level would be low profile. The Board then addressed itself to the preliminary EIS which was submitted with the application and made a number of recommend- ations on changes and possible amendments thereto. Additional discussion was held on statements made in the EIS. The Board discussed the reconstruction of existing towers to facilitate the added electrical load and were informed by Edison Co. that said towers would be of a "silk purse" type, similar to the towers presently located on the Ellis right of way between Brookhurst and Bushard Streets and that ph3tographs will be sub- mitted to the Planning Commission for review at the October.*17," meeting. Edison also stipulated that there would be no in- crease in the number of lines on these towers. 'The Board also discussed the construction schedule and the phasing in of the'gas turbines approximately two years prior to the steam units and asked if this would have any effect on the emissions. Edison informed the Board -that the generation schedule will comply with APCD requirements. The report indicates that APCD required Edison to establish five monitoring stations'to monitor the emissions. The Board discussed the location of the monitoring stations. Mr. Richardson stated that the selection of the sites will be negotiated by Edison and conformed by APCD, however, there is no indication at this time as to the location nor distance from the existing and proposed facility. He further stated that the monitoring stations would have to be in operation one year prior,to the plant going on line. The Board discussed the type of structure that would be involved and the height of same at the monitoring station and were in- formed that the structures are approximately 12 feet square and -6- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 7 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 of a normal building height. The monitors are for sampling air for various emissions. Readings will be taken periodically by APCD. The Board then discussed establishment of an ambient noise level around the existing facility at the property line, preferably along the flood control channel and additional readings to be established along Magnolia Street adjacent to the R1 area. These readings should be taken periodically during the day to establish the different ambient noise levels. Edison indicated that they will make every effort to have these ambient noise levels plotted on a map for the Planning Commission review at the October 17 meeting. The Board then discussed with Edison the survey that they are conducting on the marine environment and informed Edison that they would be recommending to the Planning Commission that the report be filed with the city for review. The Board questioned Edison as to a possible filter apparatus or system in the stacks and were informed that there would be no filtering systems within the stacks themselves as they are of conventional chimney arrangement only. Edison further stated that emission control starts with the fuel and the combustion process. The Board discussed with Edison the statement.from their fact sheet indicating that when the new combined cycle units come on line, that it will reduce the load factor of the existing facility and what possible effect this would have on reducing emissions from the existing plant. Edison indicated that they are required to run those units that produce the lowest emissions, however, this is not to say that a peak periods all.units might not be on the line, but under normal conditions, only those units having the lowest emissions would be operated. The Board also discussed with Edison the proposed color of the proposed facility and were informed by Edison that the new facilities are to be brown and green in color and that they will prefer that a color scheme be stipulated by the City for coordina- tion between the new and existing facilities. The Board asked for questions and discussion from the floor. Mr. Tom Severns, Director of Environmental Resources, asked when the EIS was to be submitted and was informed by Edison that the complete EIS would be filed with the PUC prior to April 1973. -7- 1 10/11/72 - BZA Page 8 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 Mr. Severns then asked if it would be filed prior to issuance of building permits. Edison replied that a copy of the EIS can be filed with the city upon approval by the PUC. Mr. Richardson informed Mr. Severns that they were filing a re- vised Statement of Environmental Consideration with the city pursuant to the Board's recommendation. The Board outlined the following conditions and recommendations for Planning Commission and City Council consideration: 1. A final plot plan reflecting precise location, landscaping, and berming shall be submitted. 2. Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City and State standards at the time each parcel is developed. Improvements shall include street trees, street signs, street -lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 3. Potable water supply shall be through the City of Hunt- ington Beach's water system. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The water, sewer, fire hydrant, detection, alarm and ex- hous in g systems shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The flood control channel shall be fenced to Flood Control District standards and City standards. 7. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 8. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed by the developer at locations and to specifi- cations provided by the Fire Department. 10. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 11. The total facility shall be screened with a combination of fencing, earthen berm and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. The Board shall coordinate said plan for review by all appropriate City departments to incorporate additional landscaping of sufficient height and species to achieve a variation in landscaping. -8- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 9 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 12. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 13. Emergency vehicular access as it relates to the berm to be reviewed by the Fire Department. 14. An EIS shall be submitted to the City for approval action prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. A lighting plan shall be submitted to the City for approval action prior to the issuance of building permits. Said lighting to be of a low in-::ensity rating to reduce the "Christmas Tree" effect of :he new combined cycling units from that of the existing units. 16. The survey and report on the marine environment shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. 17. Information on the noise level of the new combined cycling units shall be submitted to the City for coordination with the ambient noise level established on the plan submitted to the Planning Commission. Such information shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Upon specification and location of the five monitoring stations required by APCD, a plan shall be filed with the City for review and separate action as may be required. 19. An effort shall be made to work out color coordination between the new and existing facilities using earth tones, browns and greens. After discussion the Board explained that this request would be referred to the Planning Commission with a complete report on the statements submitted, plot plans, and conditions for approval as recommended by the Board. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO REFER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-93 TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 17, 1972 WITH THE CONDITIONS AS RECOMMENDED. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. -9- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 10 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-92 Applicant - Coast Development Co. In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 72-88 Applicant - Coast Development Co. To permit the construction of two story office building having a zero side yard setback on the south property line and ob- taining easement from property owner on the north for ingress and egress to parking stalls. The subject property is located on the east side of Main Street approximately 400 feet south of the intersection of Beach Blvd., in the R5 Office -Professional District. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Wanacot and Mr. Rodgers, representing the applicant, addressed the Board and explained the request. The Board reviewed the plans and requested the applicant to submit a total development plan and a precise plan showing circulation and parking. It was noted that the applicant would also have to procure a document for the easement. The Board suggested that the applicant, the adjacent property owner, and the staff meet together before the next hearing on the conditional exception to review a total development for subject property. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED EY SPENCER TO CONTINUE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-92 AND -CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-88 TO THE OCTOBER 25, 1972 MEETING TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME -TO MEET WITH THE STAFF AND SECURE A DOCUMENT FOR AN ACCESS EASEMENT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO. 72-66 Applicant - Humble Oil and Refining Co. To permit the installation of an in -bay automatic car wash in the third bay of an existing automobile uervice station. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue in the C4 Highway Commercial District. -10- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 11 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Paul White, representing the applicant, addressed the Board and presented elevations and revised plans. The Board discussed the flow of traffic throught the car wash with exiting to the rear. It was noted that additional trees would be required on -site for this car wash. There being no further comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND SECONDED BY SPENCER TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 72-66 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall not install new signing at the service station. 2. The new door on the proposed use shall match the existing door. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED USE PERMIT NO. 72-67 Applicant - Robert L. Taube To permit the construction of a commercial retail building within an existing shopping center as per S. 9472 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property is located on the south side of Hamilton Avenue approximately 360 ft. east of Bushard Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Robert Taube, applicant, addressed the Board and explained his request. The Board informed Mr. Taube that his plans were deficient in the turning radius as required by Code. Mr. Taube then presented revised plans and the Board reviewed them for access easements from the property to the west, landscaping of the facility, and access for wheel chairs onto the sidewalk. -11- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 12 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 There being no other comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 72-67 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plot plan received October 11, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. Hamilton Avenue shall be dedicated and fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. Improvements shall include street trees, street lights, street signs, fire hydrants, sewer and water main ex- tensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. Sewage- disposal shall be throught the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be,approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 7. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 10. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments and shall conform to ex- isting lands to the west. 11. No structures other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 12. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. -12- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 13 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-32 Applicant - Mollenhauer, Higashi & Moore, Inc. To permit the creation of 2 lots from 2 existing lots by readjustment of property lines. The subject property is bounded by Chrysler Drive on the north, Viewpoint Lane on the west, Terry Drive on the south and Beach Blvd. on the east. Mr. Richard Moore, applicant, explained the request to the Board. He further stated there was no building presently on the parcel. The Board reviewed the conditions of approval with Mr. Moore. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY SPENCER TO APPROVE DIVISION OF LAND NO 72-32 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plot plan received October 3, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. Beach Blvd., Terry Drive and Viewpoint Lane shall be dedicated and fully improved to City and/or State standards at the time each parcel is developed. Improvements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time each parcel is developed. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time each parcel is developed. 5. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time each parcel is developed. 7. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time each parcel is developed. 8. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 9. A Parcel Map shall be filed with the City and recorded prior to framing inspection of any structures on any parcel. 10. The Division of Lana shall not be effective until an agreement is signed ana recorded agreeing to the conditions listed above. -13- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 14 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-95 Applicant - Ferro -Crete Marine To permit the erection of a 6 ft. high chain link fence and to open up a building office and yard for ferro-cement boat construction, pursuant to S. 9530 of the Ordinance Code. The subject property is located on the east side of Gothard Street, 250=feet south of Warner Avenue in the M1 Light Industrial District. Mr. Kanzler, applicant, explained his request and type of business to the Board members. Discussion of an additional 10 foot dedication along the property frontage pursued. Then, the suggested conditions of approval were discussed with Mr. Kanzler and the Fire Department representative. Mr. Carl Duncan stated that a fire hydrant may be needed on the property. After discussion of the plans, Mr. Kanzler related that he would like to reverse the orientation of the use on the property to incorporate use of the driveway at the opposite end. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO APPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-95 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plot plan received October 5, 1972, as amended, to in- clude reversal of the orientation of the proposed use and dedication shall be the approved layout. 2. Gothard and Palmdale Streets shall be dedicated and fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is dev- eloped. Improvements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. - 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The water, sewer and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. -14- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 15 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 7. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 10. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 11. No structures,other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 12. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REVIEW: Red Carpet Realty 20002 Adams Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif. 72 sq. ft. pole sign and 21 sq. ft. wall sign No action was taken on this item as the Planning Department would need to contact the property owner with regard to this request. PLAYA CASTILLO 708 Adams Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif 96 sq. ft. pole sign The Board reviewed the proposed sign. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO APPROVE THE 96 SQ. FT. POLE SIGN FOR PLAYA CASTILLO WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. 1. The proposed sign is subject to conformance with the sign code. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. -15- 10/11/72 - BZA Page 16 Minutes - Board of Zoning Adjustments October 11, 1972 MISCELLANEOUS: 1st Federal Savings Sign 20 sq. ft. Wall Sign The Board reviewed the sign plans. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO APPROVE THE 20 SQ. FT. WALL SIGN WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. The maximum projection of the proposed sign shall be no more than 10 inches. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO. 71-65 - Landscaping Applicant - Pizza Hut Mr. Dave Kirchner, representing the applicant, presented landscaping plans and reviewed them with the Board. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE THE LANDSCAPING FOR USE PERMIT NO 71-65. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED. Daniel McFarland Secretary THEREBEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED. .names W. Palin Acting Secretary -16- 10/11/72 - BZA