Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-12-05MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1972 - 7 P.M. - REGULAR MEETING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins Porter (arrived at 7:20 P.M.) COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. MINUTES: ON MOTION BY BAZIL SECOND BY BOYLE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 1972, NOVEMBER 7, 1972 AND NOVEMBER 28, 1972 WERE ACCEPTED AS TRANSCRIBED AND THE MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1972 AND OCTOBER 24, 1972 WERE ACCEPTED AS CORRECTED, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, NOES: None ABSENT: Porter, Kerins, Boyle, Higgins Wallin Commissioner Wallin arrived and assumed her duties. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8039 In conjunction with USE PERMIT NO. 72-64 Subdivider: Huntington Harbour Corp. Tentative Tract No. 8039 covers two lots, 186 units, on 11.626 acres located 300 ft. north of Warner Avenue and 300 ft. northeast of Pacific Coast Highway. The Use Permit request is to allow the construction of a planned residential development of 186 units and related amendities and facilities in the R2 Medium Density Residential District, R3 Medium High Residential District and C4 Highway Commercial District. The Acting Secretary stated that a letter has been received from the applicant requesting a continuance to January 16, 1973. ON MOTION BY BAZIL SECOND BY BOYLE, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8039 •AND USE PERMIT NO. 72-64 WERE CONTINUED TO JANUARY 16, 1973 4AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: Porter TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8040 Subdivider: La Solana Corporation Tentative Tract No. 8040 covers 129 lots on 46.12 acres of R1 property located 300 ft. northeast of Pacific Coast Highway and approximately 700 ft. north of Warner Avenue. The Acting Secretary stated that a letter has been received from the applicant requesting a continuance to January 16, 1973. 1. PC 12/5/72 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 2 ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY BAZIL, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8040 WAS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 16, 1973 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: Porter TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7888 Subdivider: Classic Development Corp. Tentative Tract No. 7888 covers 29 lots on 6 acres of R1 property located south of Taylor Avenue, east of Southern Pacific Rail- road right-of-way. The Acting Secretary stated that the Subdivision Committee reviewed the tentative tract and offered several suggestions, however, a revised map reflecting these suggestions has not been received. It is the recommendation of the Subdivision Committee that the Planning Commission either deny or continue this matter. Mr. M. C. Nicke addressed the Commission and inquired as to whether this matter can be heard at this time. Mr. Nicke was informed that this is not a public hearing. He then inquired as to whether the environmental impact statement can be acted upon at this time. The Acting Secretary stated that the Environmental Review Board has not acted on the matter. A letter has been sent by the Board to the applicant requesting additional informa- tion, but no response to the request has been received. The proper action at this time would be to have a new report submitted. Mr. Nicke requested a continuance for two weeks. He will submit the required information for the Environmental Review Board tomorrow morning which will allow time for action to be taken by the Commission at the meeting of December 19. He requested the map submitted be the map considered for approval by the Planning Commission. ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY KERINS, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7888 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 19, 1972 WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: Porter TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 4419 Subdivider: Robert Stellrecht Tentative Tract No. 4419 covers 27 lots on 5.5 acres of R1 property located 295.24,ft. south of Heil Avenue west of Springdale Street. The Acting Secretary stated that the applicant has requested a continuance to December 19, 1972. ON MOTION BY BAZIL SECOND BY BOYLE TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 4419 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 19, 1972 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: Porter PC 12/5/72 2. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 3 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8139 Subdivider: Robert Stellrecht Tentative Tract No. 8139 covers 19 lots on 4.76 acres of R2 Property located north of Talbert Avenue, 1068 ft. west of Beach Boulevard The Acting Secretary stated that Mr. Ron Winterberg, represent- ing the applicant, has requested by telephone that this matter be continued to January 16, 1973. Mr. Winterberg stated that a letter confirming this telephone request will be sent to the city. Chairman Porter arrived and assumed his duties. ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY BAZIL, TENTATIVE TRACT No. 8139 WAS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 16, 1973 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Porter, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 72-7 Master Plan Amendment No. 72-7 covers approximately 100 acres located on the north side of Palm Avenue approximately 2300 ft. west of Goldenwest Street and proposes to change the zoning from Low and High Density Residential District to Medium Density Residential District. The Acting Secretary stated that Master Plan Amendment No. 72-7 was being submitted in conjunction with the next item on the agenda, Zone Case No. 72-39. He further stated that there was some confusion in advice from the City Attorney's office as to whether or not an environmental impact statement is required. Mr. Harlow then inquired of the Assistant City Attorney, Willis Mevis, whether or not an environmental impact statement is required. Mr. Mevis responded, stating that in the opinion of the City Attorney, Mr. Bonfa, it is the decision of the Planning Commission to require or not require an environ- mental impact statement. The Acting Secretary stated that pursuant to the ordinance adopted by the City Council at the December 4, 1972 meeting under Item 14, (exclusions from requirement for environmental impact statements) a zone change to a district of lesser intensity is excluded from the requirement. In the case of Zone Case No. 72-39, the overall density is reduced, however, on one portion of the property included in the zone case, there would be an increase in density. The Acting Secretary stated that in his opinion, therefore, even though the over- all density is lesser, because of the one portion being increased to a greater density, an environmental impact statement is required. A provision of the ordinance is that the department issuing the permit or entitlement may require a statement, and in this case, the Planning Commission is taken to be the department and the Commission may therefore, require an environmental impact statement. PC 12/5/72 3. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 4 Assistant City Attorney Willis Mevis agreed with the Acting Secretary's conclusions. Commissioner Wallin inquired as to whether more specific information would be obtained by completing an Environmental Impact Statement. Mr. W. E. Foster, Huntington Beach Company, addressed the Planning Commission, and stated that in his opinion, no environmental impact statement is required pursuant to provisions of Exclusion No. 14. He stated that on November 21, 1972, the Huntington Beach Company did submit a Request for Exemption Declaration. The Acting Secretary stated that an Exemption Declaration has been submitted but that it was not processed because it was thought at that time it would not be required. At this time, however, he doesn't feel the Environmental Review Board would have approved an exemption declaration on a 90 acre proposal. Commissioner Wallin asked whether an environmental impact statement will generate more information than presented on the data sheet. Mr. Foster stated that additional data is unavailable; that they don't know the effect. Commissioner Bazil stated that the Huntington Beach Company can only relate to maximums permitted by the zoning. Commissioner Kerins asked if the report could be directed to other concerns. Chairman Porter asked Mr. Foster if he would indulge the Commission a couple of weeks to allow the Commission to review the short form. Mr. Foster stated that the Planning Commission has the authority to find that the project falls within Exemption No. 14 of Resolution No. 3616 on the basis on an overall 30% reduction in density. He requested the Planning Commission to consider this option. He further stated that with regard to supplying additional information, he can only report on the basis of the minimum and maximum densities permitted by the zone. Without a specific development plan, more precise information is unavailable. The Acting Secretary agreed with this point. The Chairman stated that possibly the project could be excluded, but that not having seen the request for an exemption declara- tion, he would like an opportunity to study it and requested the applicant to allow a continuance. Mr. Foster agreed to a continuance but felt that the Environ- mental Review Board would probably want a full environmental report and that in any event, a full report will eventually be submitted and will include any information that is available. Commissioner Kerins stated that last night,Tom Severns, Environmental Resources Director, stated that an environmental impact statement would be required on this proposal. Commissioner Wallin asked Mr. Foster if he could submit "probable" information, and would like additional information on the 30% reduction. PC 12/5/72 4. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commi:3sion Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 5 Commissioner Kerins feels that Exclusion No. 14 is subject to interpretation. Mr. Foster stated that it was difficult to give meaningful data on a zone change. He again stated that the only additional information that could be provided would be based on minimum and maximum densities under the zoning and detailed information was unavailable without a specific development plan. ON MOTION BY KERINS SECOND BY BOYLE, MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 72-7 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 19, 1972 BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle NOES: None ABSTAIN: Higgins ABSENT: None ZONE CASE NO. 72-39 Applicant: Huntington Beach Company The request is for a change of zone on the northwest side of Palm Avenue as extended 922+ ft. northwesterly of the intersection of Palm and Ofelia, approximately 90 acres, from R1-0, R3-0, R4-0, Rl-0, R3-01 and R4-01 combined with oil production to R2-PD-0 and R2-PD-01 Medium Residential District Planned Development Suffix combined with oil production. ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY KERINS, ZONE CASE NO. 72-39 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 19, 1972 BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle NOES: None ABSTAIN: Higgins ABSENT: None ZONE CASE NO. 72-40 Applicant: Huntington Beach Industrial Park The request if for a change of zone from 100-M1-A-20,000 to 100-M1-A-15,000 on property located at Research Drive, east of Graham Street. The Chairman opened the public hearing. Mr. Bill Lusk, representing Huntington Beach Industrial Park addressed the Commission, explaining the reason for the re- quest and stating that the smallest lot will be 16,270 sq. ft. and the largest will be 23,760 sq. ft. The average size is 18,472 sq. ft. In response to a question by Commissioner Kerins, Mr. Lusk stated that the change in size of lot is for marketing purposes. The Chairman noted that this property adjoins Marina High School and inquired as to whether there is a plan for treatment of the periphery. Mr. Jim Palin, Planning Depattment, stated that the Ml-A zone requires a 45 ft. setback adjacent to residential property. On the westerly end of Map 7090 there is a 45 ft. setback. Adjacent to the school site there is no provision for special treatment, however, in most cases a 20 ft. setback has been provided. PC 12/5/72 5. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 6 There is a split face block wall on the existing tract 7090 and it is expected that this fence will be carried easterly. There being no one further present to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY KERINS SECOND BY BAZIL, ZONE CASE NO. 72-40 WAS APPROVED FOR THE REASON THAT IT PROVIDES A MORE FEASIBLE LAY- OUT FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 72-74 - APPEAL Applicant: Downey Savings & Loan Appellant: Joseph P. Boyle, Planning Commissioner Use Permit No. 72-74 is a request to allow the construction of a professional office building and a tires, batteries and accessories store pursuant to S. 9472.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code at the southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue in the C4 Highway Commercial District. The Acting Secretary stated that this matter was continued from November 21, 1972 to allow the Commission to have additional information. He further stated that as a commercial development of less than three acres, it is ex- empted from the requirement for an environmental impact exemption statement or report, and the Commission may act at this time. Mr. Jim Palin, Planning Department, outlined the requirements imposed by the Board of Zoning Adjustments and indicated to the Commission the location of signs on a plot plan displayed. The Chairman opened the public hearing. Commissioner Boyle stated that a tires, batteries and accessories store does not lend itself to the other uses in the area. He stated that he was also concerned about the window facing Brookhurst, it being the custom of this type store to paint the windows to indicate items for sale. Commissioner Kerins distributed photographs of a similar store located in Fountain Valley as an example of an'un- desirable tires, batteries and accessories store. It was noted that the homeowners in the vicinity did approve the plans as submitted with regard to the tire operation and building design. Commissioner Bazil stated that the use is allowed by the existing zone and that undesirable factors should be controlled through conditions imposed on the applicant. Mr. George Ritzau, representing Downey Savings and Loan addressed the Commission and stated that the original plan was for a one and two story office building on the property. However, it was felt that the parking ratio would not be sufficient. The tires, batteries And accessories store constitutes a light parking use and Downey Savings & Loan did not find the use objectionable. The facility is so located that it will not face other businesses on Brookhurst; rather it faces the Downey Savings & Loan building. He stated that Downey Savings & Loan owns the property and would not want an objectionable facility at the location. PC 12/5/72 6. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 7 It was Mr. Ritzau's feeling that the use was permitted, it was simply a matter of conditions. Mr. Bob Morrow, Real Estate Department, Goodyear Tire, addressed the Commission speaking in favor of the facility, and stated that he would be applying to Goodyear for the franchise for the store in question. He stated that he had no objection to removing plans for the window facing Brookhurst, nor did he object to not allowing painting on the windows of the store. There being no one further present to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Following a lengthy discussion, including the dissatisfaction of the Commission with the Red Carpet Realty sign, conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 72-74 were reviewed with the Commission. Commissioner Kerins requested the staff to forward a letter to Downey Savings & Loan with a copy to Red Carpet Realty, objecting to the realty sign. ON MOTION BY KERINS SECOND BY BAZIL, USE PERMIT NO. 72-74 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: A. To be completed prior to issuance of building permits: 1. A revised plot plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street shall be dedi- cated to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. 3. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 4. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City. 5. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view and reviewed by the Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval action. 6. Landscaping shall be provided on the west front of the T.B.A. and shall be shown on the revised plot plan. B. To be completed prior to framing inspection: 1. Fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed by the developer at locations and to specifications provided by the Fire Department. 2. A plan for screening of the parking compounds with a combination of fencing and landscaping shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 3. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval action. 4. All signing for the project shall be referred to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval action prior to issuance of sign permits. PC 12/5/72 7. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 8 C. To be completed prior to final inspection: 1. Adams Avenue and Brookhurst Street shall be fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. Improvements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extentions. 2. All utilities shall be installed underground. 3. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 4. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. D. To be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and the enforcement of same to take place throughout the life of the business or operation: 1. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 2. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. ' 3. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 4. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 5. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. This condition shall require that no outside display of tires shall be allowed and that no banner, pennants, valances, stringers, propellers, balloon or similar temporary signs shall be permitted except as may be otherwise permitted by the City for grand openings or anniversary sale conducted throughout the business chain. 6. No sign shall be in or on the westerly window of the T.B.A. building. 7. One monument sign -shall be the only detached sign per- mitted for each of the office and T.B.A. building. 8. Only one identification sign shall be permitted on the north wall located on the T.B.A. and shall in- clude the name of the store and operator identification. Renderings of the identification sign shall be submitted s to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval action. AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: 'None SITE PLAN NO. 72-4 Applicant: Anthony D. Plascencia Site Plan No. 72-4 is to permit an on sale beer and wine license pursuant to Section 9430.6 in the C2 Community Business District at the La Plaza Restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Goldenwest and Warner. _PC 12/5/72 8. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 9 In response to a question of Commissioner Wallin as to whether additional landscaping can be required, Jim Palin stated that the plan conforms with the landscaping requirement - Mr. Palin further stated that the applicant wants a free standing sign but that he will be required to consolidate his sign with existing signing or that the other signing will have to be consolidated to allow a free standing sign at this location. If this is not done, only a wall sign will be permitted on the restaurant. ON MOTION BY KERINS SECOND BY WALLIN, SITE PLAN NO. 72-4 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None CODE AMENDMENT NO. 72-11 Code Amendment No. 72-11 provides for a variation in yard requirements, establishes procedures for review of truck and rail loading facilities, and amends landscaping require- ments for off-street parking facilities in the M1-A Restricted Manufacturing District. The Acting Secretary stated that the Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce has reviewed the code amendment and concurs with its content. The Commission then reviewed the amendment and a vu-graph was shown of the Lusk Property. Mr. Jim Palin, Planning Department, discussed landscaping, parking, wall requirements and setback requirements. Commissioner Wallin inquired as to the need for the code amendment and the Acting Secretary explained that at present there is no provision for loading facilities in the Ml-A zone and that if the city expects to get industrial develop- ment, provision must be made for loading facilities. Commissioner Wallin inquired as to provisions for trash enclosures and Mr. Palin stated that this is required in the Administrative Review by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. Some amendments of a minor nature were made to Code Amend- ment No. 72-11. The Chairman opened the public hearing. There being no one present to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY KERINS SECOND BY BAZIL, CODE AMENDMENT NO. 72-11 WAS APPROVED AS AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None DISCUSSION Civic District Corridor along Goldenwest Street south of Huntinqton Central Park Mr. Ken Reynolds, Planning Director, showed vu-graphs of possible configurations of an expansion of the Civic District Suffix to tie the Central Park and Civic Center together via a corridor along Goldenwest Street. One configuration is a 600 ft. corridor along either side of Goldenwest and the other is a corridor on each side of Goldenwest, one lot, one owner deep. The Commission approved a configuration of one_ lot, one owner up to a maximum of 600 ft.deep along Golden - west and included an extension along Garfield Street between Goldenwest and Stewart Streets. PC 12/5/72 9. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 10 ON MOTION BY KERINS SECOND BY WALLIN THE CONFIGURATION AS AMENDED WAS APPROVED AND STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO SET THE MATTER FOR PUBLIC HEARING BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None ZONE CASE NO. 72-42 Zone Case No. 72-42 is a request to change the zone from RA-0 Residential Agricultural District combined with Oil production to C3 General Business District located at the northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Beach Boulevard. The zone case has been filed and is brought to the Commission at this time pursuant to Commission policy that all zone cases inconsistent with the master plan be reviewed prior to publication. A vu-graph of the property was shown. The Acting Secretary stated that the conditional exception on the boat sales operation on the property has expired and in order to continue in business, the operator was required to initiate a zone change. It was explained that the owner of the property is the State of California and the property was acquired by the State for right of way for the Route 39 Freeway. The boat sales operation is an interim use of the property being conducted under lease from the State. Because of the ultimate use of the property for right of way purposes, the State will not permit more than limited improvements on the property. It is estimated that the interim use may be for as long as ten years. The master plan designation on the property is "Freeway." Following discussion by the Commission, the Chairman directed the staff to initiate a master plan study of the area. The zone case will not be scheduled for hearing until the study is completed and a master plan amendment is scheduled for public hearing. CODE AMENDMENT NO. 72-31 Code Amendment No. 72-31 amends Article 984 from a Use Permit Procedure to a Conditional Use Permit Procedure for approval of Planned Residential Developments. The Chairman directed the staff to set Code Amendment No. 72-31 for public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 1103 A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach expressing appreciation to Roger D. Slates. ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY BAZIL, RESOLUTION NO. 1103 WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 1104 A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach expressing appreciation to Jere P. Murphy. PC 12/5/72 10. Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 11 ON MOTION BY PORTER SECOND BY BOYLE, RESOLUTION NO. 1104 WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS The Acting Secretary informed the Commission that a zone case has been filed by the Huntington Beach Company on approximately one acre of land on the east side of 17th Street between Pecan and Orange, from R3 to C2. The Acting Secretary directed the Commission's attention to Resolution No. 1087 adopted November 2, 1972 stating that a request of this nature would be favorably considered. Discussion followed concering the desirability of completing the Town Lot Study, the Area "D" Study, the Seacliff and Top of the Pier Plan Studies prior to considering a master plan amendment or zone case in the area. ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY BAZIL, STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO SCHEDULE A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CONSIDERATION CONCURRENTLY WITH THE ZONE CASE, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Porter, Wallin, Boyle NOES: None ABSTAIN: Higgins ABSENT: None Tract No. 7850 Commissioner Wallin reported that she and Bill Hartge, City Engineer, attended the meeting of the Water Quality Control Board during which Tract No. 7850 was discussed. The Board scheduled a public hearing on Tract 7850 for December 21. A recommendation to prohibit water runoff into the lagoon and channel was taken under advisement. Commissioner Wallin inquired as to whether the City of Huntington Beach will be making a presentation at the public hearing on December 21. Mr. Bill Hartge, City Engineer, stated that the City Administrator has been consulted concerning this matter and action by the city will be based on the Administrator.'s recommendation. Special District Designation Commissioner Kerins requested staff to develop criteria for adding a special district designation to the master plan for such uses as golf courses and airports. Criteria will be developed and presented to the Commission at a future study session. Commissioner Porter was excused and left the meeting. Adjournment There being no further business, at 11:20 P.M. ON MOTION BY BOYLE SECOND BY WALLIN, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO 3 PM, DECEMBER 12, 1972, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil, Kerins, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES: None ABSENT: Porter PC 12/5/72 11. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, December 5, 1972 Page 12 :f. V2 Kenneth A. Reyno s Secretary ffa-rcus M. Porter Chairman PC 12/5/72 12.