Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-12-13MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Administrative Annex 523 Main Street. Huntington Beach, Ca. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1972 - 1:15 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Spencer, Palin, Lipps MEMBERS ABSENT: None AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-141 Applicant: Leonard A. Lindborg ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 7.2-141 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 20, 1972, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Spencer, Palin NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-111 in conjunction with DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-35 in conjunction with CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-93 Applicant: Huntington Capital Corp. Administrative Review No..72-11 is a request to permit the construction of a commercial complex including offices, commercial business, restaurants and financial institutions pursuant to S. 9430. Division of Land No. 72-35 is a request to create three parcels from one existing parcel. Conditional Exception No. 72-93 is a request to permit the construction of a separation wall to be located 19 ft. west of the exist- ing property line of a proposed commercial complex, in lieu of 5.'9792.1.3 for the purpose of the wall setback to allow parking spaces related to the proposed complex to be located adjacent to an existing alley. Subject property is located at the northeast corner of Stark Street and Beach Blvd. in the C2 Community Business District. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception No. 72-93 Mr. Everett Dodge, representing the applicant, was present and described the proposed project. Mr. Jim Palin stated that a letter has been received from adjacent property owners objecting to the proposed wall and suggesting there would be traffic problems. Mr. Adolph Lear addressed the Board in opposition to the project. Mr. Gordon Combs, a property owner in the area, addressed the Board in opposition to the project. Mr. E. Pessek, a property owner in the area, addressed the Board in opposition to the project. There being no one further present to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 2 ON MOTION BY SPENCER SECOND BY LIPPS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-93 WAS DENIED FOR THE REASON THAT NO HARDSHIP WAS SHOWN, THE STRUCTURAL SECTION OF THE ALLEY IS INADEQUATE FOR THE USE AS PROPOSED AND PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC WILL CREATE A HARDSHIP ON ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None Fire Department representative Carl Duncan arrived. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, DI'VISION OF LAND NO. 72-35 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 20, 1972 BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-111 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 20, 1972 BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None A revised plot plan on Administrative Review No. 72-111 is to be submitted by the applicant. t ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-121 Applicant: Gerald A. Jones Administrative Review No. 72-121 is a request to permit the construction of a duplex pursuant to S. 9161.2 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 21st Street approximately 80 ft. north of Pecan Avenue in the R2 Medium Density Residential District. Mr. Gerald Jones, applicant, was present. Mr. Jim Palin stated that this project is within the moratorium area and advised the applicant that the following conditions would be imposed if the application is approved: 1. If the development standards are amended by the city, Administrative Review No. 72-121 becomes null and void. 2. If approved, Administrative Review No. 72-121 will be subject to development standards in effect at the time building permits are issued. Jim Palin stated that the applicant would be required to show a 20 ft. alley since the adjacent property is not developed. Mr. Jones stated he could adjust his plan to do this. ON MOTION BY PALIN, SECOND BY LIPPS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-121 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.. Unit to be moved 2-1/2 ft. forward on lot to allow a 12-1/2 ft. front yard setback to facilitate a 25 ft. turning radius. 21. All applicable city ordinances to be complied with. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 3 3. Administrative Review No. 72-121 to become null and void if City amends development standards applicable to this area. 4. Administrative Review No. 72-121 will become subject to development standards in effect at time building permits are issued. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-126 Applicant: L. D. Zehnder Administrative Review No. 72-126 is a request to permit the con- struction of 6 unit pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 16th street approximately 80 ft. south of Olive Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. L. D. Zehnder, applicant, was present. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-126 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-118 Applicant: Joe Shaffer Administrative Review No. 72-118 is a request to permit the construction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 7th Street approximately 80 ft. north of Olive Street in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. Jim Palin stated that a floor plan layout was requested by the Planning Department and they have been submitted and reviewed and are in compliance with codes provisions. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-118 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-119 Applicant: Joe Shaffer Jim Palin suggested that Administrative Review Nos. 72-118, 72-119, "72-120 and 72-131 all be discussed at the same time. Administrative Review No. 72-119 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment unit in the R5 High Density Residential District on property located on the west side of 13th Street approximately 130 ft.'north of Walnut Avenue in the R5 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 4 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-119 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-120 Applicant: Joe Shaffer Administrative Review No. 72-120 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment complex pursuant to S. 9231.1 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 13th Street approximately 80 feet north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-120 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-129 Applicant: J. N. Shaffer Administrative Review No. 72-129 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the northwest corner of Walnut Avenue and 17th Street in the R5 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. Mr. Jim Palin encouraged the use of material other than grape stake for fencing. Mr. Shaffer stated that the fence will be constructed of bat -on- board. Mr. Palin stated that regarding open space to the units, Units A and B are very good. Behind the structure is 102 sq. ft. for Unit A; but there has been no door provided to enable using it. He suggested removing the designation of A and B and a rear open space and leave it undesignated. If the open space is designated, it should be designated for Units C and D. Mr. Pat Spencer stated that dedication would be required for a future curb line development and dedication is required prior to issuance of building permits. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND'BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-129 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1: Patio area for Units A and B to be enclosed with a board on bat fence instead of grapestake. 2: Open space designated for units A and B to be changed to designate the open space for units C and D. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 5 3. Applicant to comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-131 Applicant: J. N. Shaffer Administrative Review No. 72-131 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 16th Street approximately 80 feet south of Orange Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-131 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps,'Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 72-80 Applicant: American Permit Use Permit No. 72-80 is a request to permit the operation of a service station within an existing service station site pursuant to S. 9480 of the ordinance code on property located on the south- west corner of Warner Avenue and Newland Street in the C2 Community Business District. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Use Permit No. 72-80. Mr. Carl Rodeheaver, representing'the applicant, was present. Mr. Jim Palin stated that the plan does not conform to Article 948 in the following areas: 1. The six percent landscaping requirement 2. Screening of restrooms and enclosed areas 3. On site 15 gal. trees 4. The Board of Zoning Adjustments recommends a monument sign Mr. Palin stated that he had contacted the architect to obtain a revised plot plan but was unsuccessful in doing so. Mr. Rodeheaver stated that he can conform to the requirements and sketched out areas on the plan and stated that a 6 ft. monument is proposed. Following discussion it was determined that the applicant will submit a revised plot plan by Monday noon. It was determined that the underground tanks are alright as they have been sealed. Elevations are to be submitted indicating compatability of monument stone and facing on some surface of the building and the trash area is to be enclosed with the same material as used on the building. The Chairman closed the public hearing. BZA 12/13/73 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 6 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, USE PERMIT NO. 72-80 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 20, 1972 TO ALLOW COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 948, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None Four copies of the revised plan and elevations and sign information is to be submitted by Monday noon. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-103 Applicant: Jorgen D. Hansen Administrative Review No. 72-103 is a request to permit construc- tion of an industrial building pursuant to S. 9530 of the ordinance code on property located on the east side of Palmdale Street, approximately 45 ft. north of Cedar Avenue in the M1 Light Industrial District. Mr. Jim Palin briefly reviewed the history of the request. A revised plot plan has been submitted to allow a turning radius and including garage doors. It was the Board's suggestion that the 10' X 18' overhead doors located at the southwest corner of the building be relocated east- erly between parking spaces No. 67, 68 and 69, to facilitate turning radius. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-103 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The plot plan received December 7, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. Palmdale Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. Improvements shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants,,and water main extensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. When sewer line is constructed, applicant is required to connect. 5. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property shall.participate in the local drainage assess- ment district. 7. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed by the developer at locations and to specifications provided by the Fire Department. 10. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 7 11. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 12. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 13. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 14. Applicant shall relocate the 10 ft. X 18 ft. overhead garage door as shown on the southwest corner of the building easterly to locate them between Spaces 6, 7 and 8, 9, to facilitate the turning radius. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 72-78 Applicant: Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. Use Permit No. 72-78 is a request to permit the remodeling and expansion of an existing restaurant pursuant to S. 9472 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code on property located on the north side of Edinger Avenue approximately 292 ft. east of Edwards Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Use Permit No. 72-78. Mr. Carl Duncan, Fire Department, left the meeting. Mr. Eichberger representing the applicant was present. Mr. Jim Palin stated that there would be some control required in the parking area, possibly posting. The Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, USE PERMIT NO. 72-78 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE CURB ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE BEING PAINTED RED TO INDICATE NO PARKING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-99 in conjunction with ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-149 Applicant: Fowler Development Co. Administrative Review No. 72-149 is a request to permit the construc- tion of a four-plex building pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code. Conditional Exception No. 72-99 is a request to permit the construc- tion of a 4 ft. high patio enclosure wall to be located within the front yard setback in lieu of S 9234 of the Ordinance Code. Subject property is located on the east side of 21st Street, approximately 80 ft. north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception No. 72-99. Messrs. Fowler and Bill Wonacott were present representing the applicant. BZA 12/13/73 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 8 Mr. Palin stated that the Board of Zoning Adjustments does not feel the open space is usable with a wall around it as shown. The Board suggests providing a gate and a 6 ft. wall to within five feet of the corner and then step down to 42". This accomp- lished the turning radius in the alley and on site. The applicant was advised that the project is within the moratorium area. The Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-99 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The 48 inch wall as shown on the plan shall be constructed with material compatible with the unit. The reason for this requirement is that the City Council has recently amended the ordinance code to allow use of this type of open space to allow variations in the front yard setbacks. 2. Conditional Exception No. .72-99 shall become null and void unless conditions of approval for Administrative Review No. 72-149 are complied with. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-149 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. Applicant to relocate the open space area along the alley to the interior property line. Said area shall be enclosed with a 6 ft. high masonry wall along the common property line and parallel with the alley except within 5 ft. of the corner in which case said wall shall step down to 42 inches. 2. A revised plot plan to be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Administrative Review No. 72-149 to become null and void if the city amends development standards applicable to the area. 4. Administrative Review No. 72-149 will be subject to develop- ment standards in effect at the time building permits are issued. S. Applicant to provide a minimum of 25 ft. turning radius for the two open parking spaces off the alley. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-100 in conjunction with ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-150 Applicant: Fowler Development Co. Administrative Review No. 72-150 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four-plex building pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code. Conditional Exception No. 72-100 is a request to permit the con- struction of a 4 ft. high patio enclosure wall to be located within the front yard setback in lieu of S. 9234 of the Ordinance Code. Subject property is located on the west side of 20th Street approx- imately 180 ft. north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 9 The Chairman opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception No. 72-100. Messrs. Fowler and Bill Wonacott were present representing the applicant. The Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-100 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The 48 inch wall as shown on the plan shall be constructed with material compatible with the unit. The reason for this requirement is that the City Council has recently amended the ordinance code to allow use of this type of open space to allow variations in the front yard setbacks. 2. Conditional Exception No. 72-100 shall become null and void unless conditions of approval for Administrative Review No. 72-150 are complied with. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-150 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. Applicant to relocate the open space area along the alley to the interior property line. Said area shall be enclosed with a 6 ft. high masonry wall along the common property line and parallel with the alley except within 5 ft. of the corner in which case said wall shall step down to 42 inches. 2. A revised plot plan to be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Administrative Review No. 72-150 to become null and void if the city amends development standards applicable to the area. 4. Administrative Review No. 72-150 will be subject to develop- ment standards in effect at the time building permits are issued. S. Applicant to provide a minimum of 25 ft. turning radius for the two open parking spaces off the alley. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-139 Applicant: Charles Hermansen Administrative Review No. 72-139 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the ordinance code on property located on the east side of loth Street approximately 155 ft. south of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. Charles Hermansen, applicant, was present. Mr. Jim Palin stated that the open space meets the criteria estab- lished and all setbacks are ok. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 10 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-139 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-135 in conjunction with DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-39 in conjunction with CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-98 Applicant: James L. Wood Administrative Review No. 72-135 is a request to permit the con- struction of an 18,631 sq. ft. concrete tilt up industrial building pursuant to S. 9511. Division of Land No. 72-39 is a request to permit the consolidation of three lots into two lots and Conditional Exception No. 72-98 is a request to permit an encroachment of 15 ft. into the required 15 ft. side yard setback in lieu of S. 9413 of the ordinance code. Subject property is located on the east side of Computer Lane approximately 630 ft. south of McFadden Avenue in the 100-M1-A-20,000 Restricted Manufacturing District. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception No. 72-98. Mr. John Flick, John Alexander Co., representing the applicant, was present and discussed the project. The Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-98 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. Property adjacent be constructed at zero setback or a minimum of 30 ft. setback as proposed by the Planning Commission and required on the Lusk Industrial Park for the reason that this provides greater flexibility and usability of the property and the Planning Commission has approved these standards and they will become effective shortly. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-39 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1.. The plot plan received November 17, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. All applicable conditions of Tentative Tract 6948 shall be complied with. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time each parcel is developed. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time each parcel is developed. S. The property shall participate in the local drainage assess- ment district at the time each parcel is developed. . BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 11 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time each parcel is developed. 7. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 8. A Parcel Map shall be filed with the City and recorded prior to framing inspection of any structures on any parcel. 9. The Division of Land shall not be effective until an agreement. is signed and recorded agreeing to the conditions listed above. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-135 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The plot plan received November 17, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. All applicable conditions of Tentative Tract 6948 shall be complied with. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. S. The water, sewer and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. All utilities shall be installed underground. 7. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 8. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Planning Department. 9. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot, shall be constructed within the project. 10. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 11. A Parcel Map shall be filed with the City and recorded prior to framing inspection of any structures on any parcel. 12- The decorative masonry wall will be carried over to and become a part of the screening for the required parking. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-136 Applicant: John F. Marsh Administrative Review No. 72-136 is a request to permit the reloca- tion of a cafe pursuant to S. 9430 of the ordinance code on property located on the west side of Bolsa Chica approximately 450 ft. north of Warner Avenue in the C2 Community Business District. BZA .12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 12 Mr. John M. Marsh, applicant, was present and discussed the project. Mr. Marsh stated that he was primarily interested at this time in obtaining authorization for the relocation of the building, although he also wants approval on the entire project. Board discussion followed. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-136 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The plot plan received November 21, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. Bolsa Chica Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City standards at the time each parcel is developed. Improve- ments shall include street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The water, sewer and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assess- ment district. 7. Soil reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979. 10. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 11. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 12. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. 13. All signs to be referred for approval action to the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 14. Additional parking shall be provided if at the time Building Department issues permits, it is determined that additional parking is required. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-41 Applicant: Santa Anita Development Co. Division of Land No. 72-41 is a request to permit the creation of four lots from three existing lots on property located south of Warner Avenue approximately 200 ft. west of the intersection of Warner Avenue and Goldenwest Street in the C4 Highway Commercial District. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 13 Mr. Bill Bethman representing the applicant was present. Mr. Jim Palin reviewed the request using a plot plan and informed the applicant that the Planning Commission has already set the signing for the area. Board discussion followed. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-41 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The plot plan received November 27, 1972 shall be the approved layout. 2. Reciprocal easements for ingress and egress shall be between Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4. 3. All applicable conditions of approval for Division of Land No. 72-15 shall be complied with. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-130 Applicant: L. 0. Lindborg Administrative Review No. 72-130 is a request to permit the con- struction of a two story office building pursuant to S. 9451 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code on property located at the northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 12th Street in the C3 General Business District. The applicant was not present. ON MOTION BY SPENCER SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-130 WAS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 3, 1973 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None SIGN REVIEW Charles Geers Red Carpet Realtors, 234 Adams Request: 30 sq. ft. Wall Sign Mr. Walt Lipps reviewed the request and read pertinent correspondence. ON MOTION BY LIPPS SECOND BY SPENCER A 30 SQ. FT. WALL SIGN AT 234 ADAMS WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None Diversified Shopping Centers 16576 Bolsa Chica (Harbor Fabriks) Request: 50 sq. ft. Wall Sign Mr. Walt Lipps stated that the letters and colors meets the criteria established by the shopping center and has been approved by Diversi- fied Shopping Centers. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 14 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS A 50 SQ. FT. WALL SIGN WAS APPROVED FOR HARBOR FABRIKS, 16576 BOLSA CHICA, BY THE FOLLOWING - VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None Dot Datsun 18835 Beach Blvd. Request: Temporary Banners Mr. Fred Archer was present and explained the request. He stated that the banners are requested to advertise a chain -wide clearance sale. ON MOTION BY LIPPS SECOND BY SPENCER, TEMPORARY BANNERS WERE AUTH- ORIZED FOR PLACEMENT AT 18835 BEACH BLVD. FOR A THIRTY DAY PERIOD, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None Shields Development 9761 Yorktown (Eastern Meat) Request: 26 sq. ft. and 24 sq. ft. Wall Signs Mr. Walt Lipps stated that the criteria for color, size and location has previously been established for the shopping center and that this sign does not conform in color. It is red rather than brown. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS, A 26 SQ. FT. AND A 24 SQ. FT. WALL SIGN WAS APPROVED AT 9761 YORKTOWN (EASTERN MEAT) SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH THE CRITERIA PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FOR THE CENTER, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS Palin, Spencer Mr. Jack Tarr, Diversified Shopping Centers Pole Sign - Druggist - Brookhurst and Adams Mr. Tarr showed drawings of a proposed sign for the Druggist, 20 ft. high and 60 sq. ft. and requested approval thereof. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, THE REQUEST FOR A 20 FT. HIGH AND 60 SQ. FT. PYLON SIGN WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW- ING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The sign shall be a maximum of 56 sq. ft. and 20 ft. height to be located at the northwest corner of Hamilton and Brook- hurst Streets within the planter on the south side of the main entrance. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-84 The Board reviewed the plan, screening walls and trash area screen- ing on Lot 21, Tract 79. BZA 12/13/72 Minutes: 11. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 15 ON MOTION BY SPENCER SECOND BY LIPPS, THE PROPOSED DESIGN WAS DETERMINED TO BE UNACCEPTABLE, BY THE FOLLOWNG VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:55 P.M. BZA 12/13/72