Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-10-02MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Civic Center Basement, Room 306 2000 Main Street - Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1974, 1:15 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Pat Spencer John Cope (for Bruce Crosby Dave Eadie Dave Eadie) OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS Captain Vanderlaan, REPRESENTED: Fire Department MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-25 (Continued from 9-18-74) Applicant: Anthony Bartoli To permit the division of one parcel of land into four parcels, pursuant to S.9811.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and Huntington Street, in an R-3, Mediur. High Density Residential District. John Cope nformed the Board that this application was granted Exemption Declaration No. 74-103 by the Environmental Review Board on October 1, 1974; the Exemption Declaration included five rec::,-nm.::!rc-!ations from the Environmental Review Board. Mr. Don Baker of Valley Consultants represented the applicant and presenl:•A a brief overview of the proposal. Mr. Baker stated that the application was incorrect in that the request was to permit the division of two parcels, rather then one, into four parcels. The Board discussed access to the property from Ellis Avenue, as well as the fact that off-street parking woukd be necessary due to Ellis being a bicycle trail. Conditions nf Approval were discussed. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 2 DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-25 (Continued) ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, EXEMPTION DECLARATION NO. 74-103 WAS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS, WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD TO BE INCORPORATED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, CROSBY, COPE NOES: NONE ABSENT• NONE ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-25 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR USE OF SAID PARCEL FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. This Division of Land shall not be effective until a Covenant and Agreement furnished by the Huntington Beach Planning Department is signed and recorded with ' the Orange County Recorder, agreeing to these Condi- tions of Approval. 2. The tentative parcel map received by the Planning De- partment on July 3, 1974 shall be the approved layout. 3. A parcel map shall be filed with, and approved by, the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Or,nnge County Recorder, prior to issuance of a Certi- fi^ate of Occupancy. 4. A .;opy of the recorded parcel map and Covenant and Ac-ooment shall be submitted to the Planning Depart- meit. 5. Access from Ellis Avenue shall be restricted to a reciprocal driveway located at property lines of Parcels 3 and 4. 6. Full dedication and improvements shall be completed prior to the development of each parcel. Said im- provements shall include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving, street trees, street lights, street signs, street drainage, and sewer and water main exten- sions in full compliance with the City of Huntington Beach street standards and requirements. 1 I MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 3 DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-25 (Continued) B. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS ON EACH PARCEL: 1. If the developer proposes to provide air condition- ing, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insu- lation in the ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7 respectively. 2. Natural gas and electricity shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers, and natural gas only shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 3. A soils engineer and/or geologist familiar with local seismic conditions shall be engated to indicate the g-factors due to earth movement for this location. 4. A structural engineer shall be engaged to compile calculations for footings and structural members of the facility to withstand these g-factors. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off --site facility equipped to handle them. AYES: SPENCER,, CROSBY, COPE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-48 (Continued from 9-18-74) Applicant: Wilbur W. Caldwell (In conjunction with Use Permit No. 74-38) To permit a six (6) inch encroachment of a proposed open unenclosed stairway into the interior side yard setback, in lieu of S.9163.4.2.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the east side of 13th Street, approximately 130 feet south of the center line of Acacia Avenue, in an R-2, Medium Density Residential District. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 4 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-48 (Continued) John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. He further informed the Board that a written communication had been received from the applicant requesting withdrawal of this application. The Board concurred with the appli- cant's request. ON MOTION BY COPE AND SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEP- TION NO. 74-48 WAS WITHDRAWN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE USE PERMIT NO. 74-38 (Continued from 9-18-74) Applicant: Wilbur W. Caldwell To permit the alteration of a residence having a non -conforming interior side yard, pursuant to S.9719 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the east side of 13th Street, approximately 130 feet south of the center line of Acacia Avenue, in an P-2, Medium Density Residential District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Cate- gorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. He further informed the Board that a written communication had been received from the applicant requesting withdrawal of this application. The Board concurred with the applicant's request', ON MOTION BY COPE AND SECOND BY SPENCER, USE PERMIT NO. 74-38 WAS WITHDRAWN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 5 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-56 (Continued from 9-18-74) Applicant: W. Lee Brown/R.J. Zinngrabe To permit the elimination of a six-foot wall dividing commercial property from residential property, in lieu of S.9730.25 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the west side of Florida Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of Garfield Avenue, in an R-5, Office Professional District. John Cooe informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class V, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. He further informed the Board that a written communication had been received from the applicant requesting a one -week continuance on this application. The Board concurred with the applicant's request. ON MOTION BY COPE AND SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-56 WAS CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 9, 1974, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE USE PERMIT NO. 74-48 (Continued from 9-25-74) Applicant: Warren C. Pitt To permit the construction of a carport, in lieu of a garage, pursuant to S.9106 of the Huntington*Beach Ordinance Code, located on the northwest corner of Bushard Street and Gr,2enwich Drive, in an R-1, Low Density Residential District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The Vice Chairman opened the Public Hearing. The applicant, Warren Pitt, addressed the Board and presented a brief overview of his revised plans. The applicant was questioned rea_arding the 20 foot front yard setback on his plans; it was determined that the tract was originally approved with a 20 foot setback rather than the 22 foot MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 6 USE PERMIT NO. 74-48 (Continued) setback as presently required by code. The applicant was further questioned regarding the cubic measurement of the storage area, and was informed that a minimum of 400 cubic feet is required; the applicant responded that the plan would meet this requirement. The applicant was informed that the inside of the carport area, including the ceiling, would require complete finishing. There being no parties present to speak for or against the proposal, the Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Conditions of Approval were discussed. ON'MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, USE PERMIT NO. 74-48 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CON- DITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or builC `_ng. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the Master Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's Policy Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 1, 1974 shall be the approved layout. 2. Soil and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer. Said report shall be sub- mitted to the Department of Building and Community MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 7 USE PERMIT NO. 74-48 (Continued) Development and shall be subject to approval by that Department. AYES: SPENCER, CROSBY, COPE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-29 (Continued from 9-25-74) Applicant: Jerry L. Heidemann (In conjunction with Administrative Review No. 74-118) To permit the division of one legal parcel of land into two parcels, pursuant to S.9811.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordi- nance Code, located on the southwest corner of McFadden Avenue and Product Lane, in a 100-M1-A, 20,000 Restricted Manufacturing District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is within the area covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 73-16 which was approved by the City Council on March 18, 1974. The applicant, Jerry L. Heidemann, was present; also present were Guy Heidemann and Mike Pontius. Board discussion centered on the recordation of the parcel map; applicant was informed that the reciprocal driveway between parcels #1 and #2 would need to be specified on same. Bruce Crosby stated that three prints of the parcel map should be submitted t,; the Public Works Department for a plan check. Coiiditions of '+proval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COPE, DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-29 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR USE OF SAID PARCEL FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. This Division of Land shall not be effective until a Covenant and Agreement furnished by the Huntington Beach Planning Department is signed and recorded with the Orange County Recorder, agreeing to these Con- ditions of Approval. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 8 DIVISION OF LAND NO. 74-29 (Continued) 2. The tentative parcel map received by the Planning Department on October 2, 1974 shall be the approved layout. 3. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. A copy of the recorded parcel map and Covenant and Agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Depart- ment. 5. The reciproc._il driveway location between parcels 1 and 2 shall be specified on the parcel map. AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-118 (Continued from 9-25-74) A licant: Jerry L. Heidemann In conjunction with Division of Land No. 74-29 To permit the construction of an industrial building, pursuant to S.9511 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the southwest corner of McFadden Avenue and Product Lane, in a 100-M1-A,-20,000 Restricted Manufacturing District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is within the area covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 73-16, which was approved by the City Council on March 18, 1974. The applicant, Jerry Heidemann, was present; also present were Guy Heidemann and Mike Pontius. The Board reviewed the proposed plan with the applicant and discussed Conditions of Approval. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY COPE, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-118 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The :onceptual plot plan and elevations received September 23, 1974 shall be the approved layout. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 9 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-118 (Continued) 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 3. Soil and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer. Said report shall be sub- mitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shall be subject to approval by that Department. 4. Fire protection and detection systems, including automatic sprinkler systems, standpipe systems, fire hydrants, fire alarm systems, and any other required fire protection and detection devices or systems, shall comply with the specifications of the Huntington Beach Fire Code. Plans for such systems and devices shall be subject to approval by the Fire Department and Department of Public Works. B., TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: A parcel map shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office and a copy of such recorded map shall be filed with the Planning Department. AYES: CROSBY, COPE, SPENCER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-53 (Continued from.9-25-74) Applicant: Huntington Beach Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses To permit the construction of a six foot high fence within the front yard setback, in lieu of S.9614 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the north side of Talbert, approxi- mately 75 feet west of Bell Circle, in an R-2, Medium Density Residential District. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 10 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-53 (Continued) John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The Vice Chairman re -opened the Public Hearing. Present to represent the applicant were: Mr. L. Bell, Mr. J. Gildenson, Mr. John Atrich, Mr. Mike McGorry, Mr. M. Marriot, and Mr. M. Sargent. Mr. Bell addressed the Board, stating that his organization had discussed and -considered the alternative plans which had been suggested by John Cope and Pat Spencer at the previous hearing of this application, and that it was their consensus that they should pursue the application for the Conditional Exception due to the hardships previously cited, i.e. vul- nerability of the property in the areas of vandalism, lia- bility, and theft. He also stated that he did not feel a wrought iron fence as requested would impair the vista of the property, and presented photographs of other similar fences to substantiate same. There being no parties present to speak for or against the proposal, the Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. The Board again reviewed the alternatives as presented at the previous hearing, and discussed the justifications for hard- ship. John Cope re -state" ais previous opinion that the applicant had not demonstrated sufficient hardship to warrant the exception, and that the fence, as proposed would present the effect of a solid mass, thus causing a detrimental vista prespective. Bruce Crosby stated that the items cited by the applicant as hardships were of the same nature as those that can occur at any development, were not limited solely to this property, and therefore did not substantiate hardship. Pat Spencer stated that he could not recommend approval of the request due to the fact that sufficient hard- ship had not been demonstrated; however, he recommended appro- val of the plan with modifications, i.e. additional landsca- ping, and a 20 foot setback of the fence. Captain Vanderlaan, representing the Fire Department, stated that the fence should be secured by a chain and that no locking device should be utilized. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 11 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-53 (Continued) ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-53 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: Because of special circumstances on the particular property and the nature of the use, a protective fence is warranted and needed, and the required setback of fifteen feet would create an on -site parking problem. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: Applicant to provide a minimum six-foot landscape area across the front with a decorative fence gate at points of ingress and egress, said gate to set back 20 feet from the ultimate right-of-way line. Gate to be secured by chain; no locking device to be utilized. AYES: SPENCER, CROSBY NOES: COPE ABSENT: NONE PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 74-9 Applicant: Toups Corporation To permit a revision to a1L proposed buildings within an approved planned residential development, pursuant to S.9811.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The revision involves the replacement of the unit types with completely redesigned units; the property is located on the southwest corner of 17th Street and Garfield Street, in an R-2, Medium Density Residential District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is within the area covered by Exemption Declaration No. 73-107, granted to Tentative Tract No. 5642 on July 3, 1973. The Vice Chairman opened the Public Hearing. Representing the applicant was Mr. Pat Capp; also present was Mr. Gary Grits, representing Presley of Southern California. Mr. Capp addressed the Board and presented a brief overview of the proposed revisions to the project. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 12 PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 74-9 (Continued) Mrs. Vivian Alvarez was present and requested a brief review of the project; Mr. Capp explained that there were no major revisions to the plan and that those proposed involved only replacement of unit types. There being no other parties present to speak for or against the proposal, the Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. The applicant's representative was informed that this appli- cation must be referred to the Planning Commission in view of the fact that approval for the project was granted by that Board, therefore any revisions to same must be approved by them. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COPE, PLOT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 74-10 WAS REFERRED TO'THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 15, 1974, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-59 Applicant: Rudolph A. Soto To permit a six foot enczuichment into the exterior side yard, in -lieu of S.9103.2.2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the southeast corner of Lewis Lane and Galipean Drive, in an R-1, Low Density Residential District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The Vice Chairman opened the Public Hearing. The applicant, Rudolph Soto, addressed the Board and presented a brief overview of his plan for a room addition to his home; he further cited the irregular shape of his lot as justifi- cation for hardship to substantiate his request for a Condi- tional Exception. There being no parties present to speak for or against the proposal, the Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 13 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-59 (Continued) The Board discussed the plan and alternative methods to allow the room addition without necessitating the encroachment into the exterior side yard. The applicant was not receptive to the alternative methods proposed by the Board. The Board discussed the applicant's justification for hardship, and concurred in that sufficient justification was non -existing. ON MOTION BY COPE AND SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-59 WAS DENIED, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND REASON, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: The property is on a larger than average R-1 lot, which allows for at least two alternatives for an addition to the house; therefore it is felt that sufficient hardship has not been shown to warrant an exception to the side yard setback re- quirement. REASON FOR DENIAL: The applicant failed to justify hardship. AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE USE PERMIT NO. 74-49 Applicant: Richard J. Pasqualino To permit an upholstery business, pursuant to S.9430.7(c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the west side of Main Street, approximately 155 feet north of the centerline of Walnut Avenue, in a C-3, General Business District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The Vice Chairman opened the Public Hearing. The applicant, Richard J. Pasqualino, addressed the Board and delineated his plans for utilizing an existing building for MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2; 1974 Page 14 USE PERMIT NO. 74-49 (Continued) an upholstery business. He further addressed the Board re- garding off-street parking requirements, questioning whether he would be required to allocate the adjoining lot for parking, and if so, would be later be allowed to build on that lot. Pat Spencer responded that if the lot were designated for business purposes, it would need to remain as such unless an alternative were later provided. It was further noted that the parking allo- cation need not necessarily be directly adjacent to the business, but could be provided at a site within 150 feet from same. Mr. Pasqualino further questioned whether it would be permissable to park the business truck inside the building; Captain Vanderlaan, representing the Fire Department, responded that a visit to the location would be necessary in order to make a determination. The Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Conditions of Approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, USE PERMIT NO. 74-49 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. b. Property and improvements to the vicinity of such use r. ou'lding. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the Master Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's policy plan. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: Parking area to be kept clear of trash and debris. AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MINUTES: Board Of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 15 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-152 Applicant: American Savings & Loan Association To permit the construction of an American Savings office, pursuant to S.9430 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane, in A C-2, Community Business District. John Cope informed the Board that this application was granted Exemption Declaration No. 74-144 by the Environmental Review Board on September 24, 1974. Representing the applicant were Mr. Earl Bouillon and Mr. Leroy Velasquez. The Board reviewed the proposed plan and determined that it was in conformance with landscaping, open space, and parking requirements. Bruce Crosby informed the applicant's representative that it would be necessary to pay assessor's fees on the entire parcel, rather than only on that portion of land being developed; he further stated that a Division of Land permit would negate that requirement. Mr. Bouillon stated that these fees might have been previously paid as a result 3f the Administrative Review application for the temporary building on the site; he further stated that he would investigate the matter with the Public Works Department. John Cope informed Mr. Be- illon that the temporary building permit would expire six months from the date that construction began on the permanent building; if that deadline cannot be met, it will be necessary to apply for an extension of time on the permit. Conditions of Approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COPE, EXEMPTION DECLARATION NO. 74-144 WAS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COPE, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-152 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 16 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-152 (Continued) A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received September 5, 1974 shall be the approved layout. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 3. Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane shall be dedicated to City standards. 4. Soil and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer. Said reports shall be sub- mitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shall be subject to approval by that Department. 5. Fire protection and detection systems, including auto- matic sprinkler systems, standpipe systems, fire hydrants, fire alarm systems, and any other required fire protec- tion and detection devices or systems; shall comply with the specifications of the Huntington Beach Fire Code. Plans for such systems and devices shall be submitted to the Fire Department and shall be subject to approval by the Fire Department and Department of Public Works. B. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION: Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane shall be improved, including sidewalks, street trees, street lights, street signs, street drainage, and sewer and water main extensions in full com- pliance with the City of Huntington Beach street standards and requirements. AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1174 Page 17 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-156 Applicant: Carlos E. DeArcos To permit installation of an overhead utility line, pursuant to S.9730.9 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the south side of Washington Avenue, approximately 340 feet east of the center line of Lyndon Street, in an R-2, Medium Density Residential District. John Cope informed the Board that this application is a Categorical Exemption, Class I, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The applicant, Mr. Carlos E. DeArcos, was present and deli- neated the reasons for his request; he also stated that the Edison Company required the installation of a power pole for the utility line. Bruce Crosby responded that installation of power poles is not in conformance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code; the Board concurred that approval of the overhead utility line would be conditional upon deletion of the power pole. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-156 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. ' With deletion of power pole as shown on plot plan. 2. Installation of a service panel to facilitate conversion to underground utilities at a future date, pursuant to S. 9730.12 _)f the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. AYES: 'OP1;i`'CE"', CROSBY, COPE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 151 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-13411 Applicant: Omer W. Long To permit the establishment of a wholesale lumber yard, utilizing an existing building, pursuant to S.9530 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code,, located on the west side of Nichols Avenue, approximately, 970 feet north of Slater Avenue, in an M-1, Light Industrial District. MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 18 ISI ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-BM (Continued) John Cope informed the Board that this application was granted Exemption Declaration No. 74-139 on September 24, 1974 by the Environmental Review Board. He further recommended a one --week continuance in order to allow additional time for staff to review the proposal with the applicant; he stated that the applicant concurs with this recommendation. ON MOTION BY COPE AND SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-151 WAS CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 9, 1974, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY- NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -� 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 73--66 Applicant: Charles Mantle Request for approval of the rooftop screening plan for Tamura Furniture Store. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COPE, THE ROOFTOP SCREENING PLAN FOR TAMURA FURNITURE STORE WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, COPE, CROSBY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 1 MINUTES: Board of Zoning Adjustments October 2, 1974 Page 19 SIGNS: Applicant: Neill Neon, Inc. Request: Pole Sign for Piggy's Restaurant Location: 504 Pacific Coast Highway ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, SUBJECT SIGN WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: REASON: Sign is not in keeping with intent of Section 9760.2.19, which allows for only the name of, or symbol for, a business to be placed on an identification sign. AYES: SPENCER, CROSBY, COPE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Applicant: Brent Enterprises, Inc. Request: Pole Sign for Coin -Operated Car Wash (Use Permit No. 74-12) Location: South side of Garfield Avenue, approximately 200 feet west of Brookhurst Street. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, SUBJECT SIGN WAS CONCEPTUAL1,Y ?APPROVED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SPENCER, CROSBY, COPE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. O,L A. � I - J hn M. Cope, tActing Secretary 61'ard of Zoning Adjustments