Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-03-18MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, March 18, 1975 - 7:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates Commissioner Porter arrived at 7:15 p.m. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Higgins NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. CONSENT CALENDAR: ON MOTION BY GEIGER AND SECOND BY SLATES THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR WERE APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: MINUTES: Minutes of February 25, 1975 and March 4, 1975 were approved. ZONE CASE NO. 74-4 Applicant: Robert R. Potter Continued to April 1, 1975 ZONE CASE NO. 74-13 Applicant: Michael J. Major Continued to April 1, 1975 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 75-02 Applicant: Calvary Baptist Church Continued to April 1, 1975 TENTATIVE TRACT 8578 Applicant: Covington Bros. Withdrawal of extension of time request approved. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins, Porter SPECIFIC PLAN: Townlot Area No. 2 Ed Selich stated that the public hearing would be held on the Specific Plan Ordinance and not the Assessment District. The Assessment District will be brought before the City Council at a later date. Bryan Austin, Planning Department, addressed the Commission and stated that the draft to be presented is basically the same Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 2 ordinance presented in Appendix A of the Specific Plan document reviewed at the February 25, 1975 study session. He stated that the Staff would like comments from the Commission as well as property owners so that revisions could be made and a finalized ordinance prepared for a later meeting. Commissioner Slates expressed concern over rear yard setbacks and size of accessory buildings per unit. He also questioned the requirement for 30" box trees per lot, as well as trash enclosures. Chairman Kerins opened the public hearing. Mr. Richard Wann addressed the Commission stating that he was a property owner in the Townlot. He objected to the parking court concept. He noted that over 750 of the lots are not developed and if curbs, gutters, and sidewalks were put in they would have to be torn out when new development occurs. He felt that higher densities were designed to help the large property owners and not the small. He objected to the cost. Mr. Everett Bomgardner addressed the Commission and inquired as to who instigated the plan. Mr. Selich noted that the study of this area has been going on for a number of years. Mr. Bomgardner felt that the cost was too high and that the City should have been main- taining the streets all along. Ms. Helen Robinson stated that two years ago she had bought property on 17th Street (a commercial building used as a print shop). She stated that the zoning was changed from M2 to R2 without her knowledge and now her building was worthless. She is unable to use the vacant half of the building and the building is not suitable for converting into an apartment. She further complained that due to a bike trail there is nb parking for customers. Mr. Tom Ward addressed the Commission and voiced his objections to the increased density and the parking court concept. He noted that access to some parking courts will require sidewalks through existing lots, with some pedestrian access very close to bedroom windows. He further objected to staggering of front yard setbacks. Mr.'Lin Lockear spoke'in opposition to density increase citing problems of theft, noise, and parties as problems that would result because of increased density. He felt that parking court perpendicular parking would be a safety hazard. He also thought the City should have maintained the street through the years. Mr. Gerald Hoskins addressed the Commission and stated that he was very much in favor of the plan and felt that it would add to the value of the property. His only concern was in taking so long to become finalized. Mr. John Peterson stated that he felt the entire area should be zoned R1 and the ordinance would be of benefit to large property owners. I 1 PC 3/18/75 2. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 3 Sally Johnson spoke in opposition to the Specific Plan for Townlot Area No. 2. Mr. Roy Woolsey addressed the Commission and stated that he felt the City should have maintained the streets in the Townlot area. Mr. Flint Morrison, President of the HOME Council, expressed opposition to proposed increase in density and the lack of control over the developer which is required in other areas. Mr. Bill Nelson addressed the Commission and stated that he was in agreement with all those who had voiced opposition to the proposed plan. He felt that the City should have maintained the area properly. Mr. Mel Hofflieger spoke in opposition to the plan stating that front yard setback is inadequate and parkway would be encroached upon. He discussed the improbability of Coastal Commission's concurrence. He preferred R2 zoning and felt that cul-de-sacing was unnecessary. Ms. Sally Gipple objected to off -site parking and parking courts. She was not opposed to cul-de-sac streets but felt parking reduction is not necessary to obtain innovative designs and open space. Commissioner Bazil discussed'the problems of parking on the streets when parking spaces or garages were available. . Commissioner Finley stated she would like the zoning to be R2. Chairman Kerins closed the public hearing. Commission discussed a date for the revised plan to be evaluated. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PORTER SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE TOWNLOT AREA NO. 2 WAS CONTINUED TO APRIL 15, 1975 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5189 Applicant: Robert Stellrecht Tentative Tract No. 5189, filed on May 15, 1974, is a request to permit the subdivision of land into 12 legal lots. The developer has proposed to build four-plexes. The property is located at the southeast corner of Graham and Heil. 3. PC. 3/18/75 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 4 Jim Palin updated the Commission on the new Subdivision Ordinance prepared to conform with the new State Map Act. Mr. Palin noted that a map was on display for viewing by Commission. He discussed the conditions of approval suggested by Staff. Commissioner Porter commended Mr. Stellrecht for the amount of time spent with Staff in working out problems. ON MOTION BE SLATES AND SECOND BY PORTER TENTATIVE TRACT 5189 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The tentative map received and dated January 30, 1975 shall be the approved layout. 2. Vehicular access rights to Heil Avenue and Graham Street shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant system shall be designed to City standards. 4. The water system shall be through the City system. 5. The sewage disposal system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 6. Subject property shall be subject to the local drainage assessment district requirements and fees. 7. All utilities shall be installed underground. 8. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to prevent siltation and provide erosion control both during and after construction of the project. 9. A decorative masonry wall shall be constructed to City specifications along Heil Avenue and Graham Street. Said wall shall be six (6) inches wide and six (6) feet high. The height of said wall shall be measured from whichever side is higher at finished grade. The architectural design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Department. The structural design shall be approved —by —the Depart— ment of Public Works and shall be included as part of the street improvement plan. The intent of this condition is to improve the street scene along Heil Avenue and Graham Street. 10. A landscape planter shall be provided long Heil Avenue and Graham Street at locations as*specified by plans and specifications on __ file in the Department of Public Works and the requirements of the Planning Commission. 1 PC 3/18/75 4. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 5 11. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the - insulation in the ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respectively. 12. All building spoils, such as unused lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus and unusable � materials, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 13. Natural gas and 220V electricity shall be stubbed in at locations of clothes dryers, natural gas shall be stubbed in at location of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 14. Double paned windows shall be installed within the units facing onto the adjacent arterial highways. 15. An Engineering Geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration for earth movement for subject property. 16. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City Builcling Department for review. FINDINGS: 1. In accordance with Section 66474 of the Government Code, the Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of Land Use of the City. 2. The subject site is suitable for the proposed type of develop- ment. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. 4. Substantiated upon the Environmental Review Board's findings, the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 5. The design of the proposed subdivision will not be detrimental to the health and general welfare of the vicinity. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins 5. PC 3/18/75 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 6 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8270 Applicant: Classic Development Corporation In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 74-21 Applicant: Classic Development Co. Tentative Tract No. 8270 is a request to permit the subdivision of a 1.25 gross acre parcel into 12 condominium lots and one common lot located on the southwest corner of Constantine and Lister. Conditional Use Permit No. 74-21 is a request to permit the construction of a 12 unit planned residential development on the southwest corner of Lister Lane and Constantine Drive in an R3, Medium High Density Residential District. Mr. Palin stated he had no information other than that contained in the staff report. Conditions of approval were discussed. Chairman Kerins opened the public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 74-21. Mr. Jerry Collins, representing the applicant,.stated that he would be glad to answer any questions. There being no one else present to speak for or against the Conditional Use Permit, the public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BAZIL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 74-21 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The Site Plan for Conditional Use Permit No. 74-21 filed with the City of Huntington Beach and dated January 14, 1975 shall be the approved layout. 2. This project shall be annexed to and be made a part of Tract 8011, existing to the north, to satisfy the requirement for the 10,000 square feet of recreational open space. 3. A six-foot (6') decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along the westerly property line. 4. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant systems shall be designed to City standards. 5. The water system shall be through the City water system. 6. The sewerage disposal system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach sewerage system. PC 3/18/75 6. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 7 7. Subject property shall be subject to the local drainage assessment district requirements and fees. 8. All utilities shall be installed underground. 9. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a Final Map. This system shall be designed to prevent siltation and provide erosion control both during and after construction of the project. 10. The CC&R's and Association Rules shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles in or upon open parking spaces. 11. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respectively. 12. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, -pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 13. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers, and natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 14. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the project property. 15. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City Building Department for review. 16. Stamped concrete shall be constructed within the parking court delineated on the plot plan received originally by the City, dated March 12, 1973. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Finley, Slates NOES: Kerins, Porter ABSENT: Higgins Commissioner Porter stated that he did not feel that the planned development should be separated from the recreational facility by a collector street. 7. PC 3/18/75 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 8 ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BAZIL TENTATIVE TRACT 8270 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. -The Tentative Tract Map 8270 filed with the City of Huntington Beach and dated January 14, 1975 shall be the approved layout. 2. This approval of Tentative Tract 8270 shall only be in effect for Conditional Use Permit No. 74-21. FINDINGS: 1. In accordance with Section 66474 of the Government Code, the Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements. - is consistent with the General Plan of Land Use of the City. 2. The subject site is suitable for the proposed type of development. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. 4. Substantiated upon the Environmental Review Board's findings, the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 5. The design of the proposed subdivision will not be detrimental to the health and general welfare of the vicinity. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates NOES: Porter ABSENT: Higgins TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8821 Applicant: Lanco Engineering Tentative Tract No. 8821 filed on November 5, 1974 is a request to permit, the subdivision of approximately 3.1 acres of real property into a 16 lot single family development located on the south side of Warner Avenue 1330 ft. east of Bolsa Chica Street in an R1 district. Mr. Jim Palin discussed the Subdivision Committee held on January 3, 1975 and the items discussed at that time. A vugraph was presented and -aerial photos were shown. There was a discussion on the grading problems. Mr. Clark Leonard, Engineer for Lanco Engineering, addressed the Commission and stated that he had read all of the Conditions of Approval and was in agreement with all conditions. I 1 PC 3/18/75 8. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 9 There was further discussion on the grading differential. Mr. Palin stated that Staff would like to have an opportunity to resolve the grading problems and would like to see a more detailed plan. Mr. Leonard stated that he would be agreeable to a continuance. ON MOTION BY FINLEY AND SECOND BY PORTER TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8821 WAS CONTINUED TO APRIL 1, 1975 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8875 Applicant: Standard -Pacific Corp. Tentative Tract Map 8875 filed on January 22, 1975 is a request to permit a 10 lot single family subdivision on approximately 1.928 acres of land. The property is located on the south side of Adams Avenue west of Newland Street upon property which had been set aside for an oil operations site on New Britain Lane. Mr. Palin stated that the property owners desired further communi- cation with the developer than the letter which had been sent to them concerning possibility of New Britain being made into a through street. A vugraph and aerial photos were presented. Mr. Dave Langlois, representing Standard -Pacific Corporation, addressed the Commission and stated that they planned to replace landscaping that might be damaged, install new street improvements and eliminate all existing street improvements such as curb, gutter, sidewalks and surfacing. Mr. Lloyd Granger, President of the Homeowners Association, addressed the Commission and stated that their main concern was that the street remain as cul-de-sacs and not become a through street. He noted that a petition had been signed by a great majority of residents in favor of retaining two cul-de-sacs and opposing making New Britain a through street. He cited safety of children and prevention of excessive speeding as reasons for retaining the cul-de-sacs. Ms. O'Mansky expressed concern over replacement of landscaping and some brick work. Ms. Herndon also expressed concern work. It was noted that a letter Standard -Pacific to be responsible from Wayne Herndon. over landscaping and concrete outlining areas they requested for had been received and filed 9. PC 3/18/75 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 10 Tom DeProsperis spoke in favor of keeping the cul-de-sacs for safety of the children. It was also noted that Mr. DeProsperis had presented a letter to the Planning Department requesting that the cul-de-sacs remain 'with one being moved to back up to the other. Mr. George Cox stated that he bought his property in 1972 specifically because it was on a cul-de-sac for reasons of privacy, safety, and security. Mr. Langlois spoke again in behalf of Standard -Pacific and stated that they would make all repairs necessary, that, in fact, they were in favor of back up on the cul-de-sacs which would require moving one wall. Secretary Harlow suggested that the matter be continued in order to coordinate a meeting between the Staff, developer, and residents to discuss the problems. ON MOTION BY GEIGER AND SECOND BY BAZIL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8875 WAS CONTINUED TO APRIL 1,-1975 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins ZONE CHANGE NO. 75-2 Applicant: Kendall Development Co. This is a request for a change of zone from R2-PD-14 to R2-5.5. The applicant has been processing a tentative map through the City under the PD concept and has completed all environmental reivew requirements. He wishes to change the development concept from PD to single family homes at a similar density. PD Suffix does not permit single family homes and the applicant must have a change of zone to be able to proceed with a tentative tract map. The property is located on the west side of Graham as Graham continues south from the intersection of Slater and Graham. Mr. Ed Selich addressed the Commission and briefly outlined the history of the application. The hearing was opened to the public on Zone Case 75-2. Mr. Frank Carr, representing Kendall Development, addressed the Commission stating that they would prefer the application be handled in an expeditious manner. Commission discussion followed. PC 3/18/75 10. Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 11 ON MOTION BY FINLEY AND SECOND BY PORTER ZONE CHANGE 75-2 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The Zone Change will make property in conformance with adjacent properties to the east. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 75-01 Applicant: The Family Arcade Conditional Use Permit No. 75-01 is a request to establish a supervised amusement center for the youths of the Community. The amusement arcade will consist of electronic amusement devices such as electronic video games, gallery rifles, pool tables, air hockey tables, etc... all of which will be contained in a completely enclosed building. The location is 5904 and 5906 Warner Avenue. Mr. John Cope addressed the Commission and stated that he had no additional information other than that contained in the staff report. He noted that a letter from Dr. Samuel J. Sills protesting the pro- posed use had been received by the Planning Commission. Chairman Kerins opened the public hearing. Mr. Sheldon, representing the Family Arcade, addressed the Commission and stated that he would object to Condition No. 3 as proposed by Staff concerning the closing hours. He would want to remain open on Saturday and Sunday nights after 10:00 p.m. Chairman Kerins noted that a cocktail lounge was located adjacent to the proposed location. Mr. Ken Foresome addressed the Commission and stated that the City Council turned the request over to the Planning Commission. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Kerins stated that he had talked to a number of people in the area who thought such a use would be detrimental to the area. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PORTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO., 75-01 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The use is incompatible with existing uses in the neighborhood. 2. It would be detrimental to business traffic. REASONS: 1. The proposed use has a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing in the area. 2. The proposed use is not compatible with existing or other proposed uses in the neighborhood. 11. PC 3/18/75 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 12 3. The relationship of the proposed use to others on the site is not properly integrated. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins MISCELLANEOUS: Communication from H. E. Hartge requesting consideration by Planning Commission of street vacation to determine if it is in conformity with the City's General Plan. This was necessitated by City Council's approval, at October 21, 1974 meeting, of $9,000 for the construction of a wall at top of the slope along west side of Graham Street, south of Warner. The construction of the wall will necessitate vacating a portion of the slope back to the property owners. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE REQUEST WAS APPROVED AS BEING IN CONFORMITY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins Letter from Orange County Flood Control District with attached location map and Negative Declaration on the Santa Ana River Channel project between Garfield Avenue to northerlv of the San Dieao Freeway. ON MOTION BY KERINS AND SECOND BY SLATES NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS APPROVED AND PROPOSED PROJECT WAS FOUND TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Kerins, Finley, Slates, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: Higgins 1975/76 Planning Program Priority List Staff was directed to,transmit to City Council with note that Commission will be glad to discuss any items if Council so wishes. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS: Commissioner Porter discussed the meeting with Orange County Transit District Monday, March 17, 1975. He outlined OCTD's proposed route. Chairman Kerins commended the Transportation Committee on their progress. PC 3/18/75 12. I 1 Minutes. H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, March 18, 1975 Page 13 STAFF'S COMMENTS: Secretary Harlow discussed the action of City Council meeting on March 17, 1975. He also discussed the proposed freeway off ramp and stated that he would determine if'Legislator Burke has been contacted concerning this need. ADJOURNMENT: ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:35 P.M. BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE. Ric and A. HbLrlow Edward H. Kerins Secretary Chairman 13. PC 3/18/75