HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-03-02MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 1976 - 7:00 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates,
Boyle, Kerins
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chairman Slates noted that Commissioner
Shea was ill.
NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT OFFICE.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BAZIL THE MINUTES OF
FEBRUARY 10, 1976, AND FEBRUARY 18, 1976, WERE APPROVED BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
None
SCHEDULED ITEMS:
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 76-1"A" and 76-1"B"
Edward Selich addressed the Commission and stated that 8 issues
were at stake on 76-1"A". He referred to the memo from the Project
Area Committee. There was a discussion on item 4, a. through h.
with regard to the designations of the 8 areas on the General Plan.
Chairman Slates opened the public hearing.
Bob Terry, a representative of the Project Area Committee, stated
that 4 a., the old civic center site, should be in Planning Reserve.
Tom Whaling, Chairman of the Project Area Committee, stated that
he, as a minority of one, felt the site of the old civic center
should be a place for low and moderate income housing. He was
j opposed to changes.on the pier.
The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
I
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 2
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MOVED TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE
DATED FEBRUARY 27, 1976, EXCEPT FOR MODIFYING ITEM 4 c. TO DESIGNATE
THE HUNTINGTON PACIFIC APARTMENTS AS OPEN SPACE ON THE GENERAL
PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: I Shea
Monica Florian addressed the Commission on General Plan Amendment
76-1"B". She stated that the Staff had reviewed the new information
presented but that it must stand with the original recommendation
to designate this property medium density residential.
Chairman Slates opened the public hearing.
Jerome Bame, representing the owners of the property, addressed the
Commission and requested that due to its proximity to the Town and
Country Shopping Center and frontage on Beach Boulevard, his client
requested that the Commission consider favorably designating the
front 3.66 acres abutting Beach Boulevard as commercial and the
rear 5 acres medium density residential on the General Plan. He
stated that the owner of the property is prepared to develop the
entire acreage as one project. He presented a miniature mock-up
of a concept of commercial development.
George Snyder, President of the Home Council, urged the Commission
to maintain its original recommendation of medium density resi-
dential designation on the property.
Commission discussion ensued.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PARKINSON AND SECONDED BY BOYLE FOR PLANNING
COMMISSION TO REAFFIRM PREVIOUS POSITION AND DESIGNATE 2.2.1
AS MEDIUM DENSITY.
VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Boyle
NOES: Bazil, Slates, Kerins
ABSENT: Shea
THE MOTION FAILED
Commissioner Parkinson discussed the strip zoning along Beach
Boulevard.
Commissioner Bazil stated that in view of the fact that the City has a
commitment from the developer on plans for development of the entire
acreage, he had changed his mind on the land use designation.
-2- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 3
Chairman Slates felt that a plan for commercial on the front and
residential on the rear had merit.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BAZIL STAFF WAS DIRECTED
TO DESIGNATE THE FRONT 3.66 ACRES ABUTTING BEACH BOULEVARD IN
SECTION 2.2.1 AS COMMERCIAL ON THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE REAR
5 ACRES DESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON THE GENERAL
PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: Parkinson
ABSENT: Shea
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1976 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
Bryan Austin addressed the Commission and stated that under
the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974 the City is entitled to receive 2.4 million dollars
over a three year period. The City is currently entering
the 2nd entitlement year in which it is eligible to receive
$690,000 of these funds. To receive these funds the City
must prepare a Community Development Program and Housing
Assistance Plan. This year to increase citizen participation
in the formulation of these programs, the City Council appointed
a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). The CAC held two meetings
in February at which time they gathered citizen input. Based
on the input they received from city departments, community
organizations, and individuals, the Committee formulated
its recommended Community Development Program and Housing
Assistance Plan. The specific projects which the Committee
recommends for funding in the second year entitlement are:
Project Cost
1. Construction of a combination Community Center, $109,000
Human Service Center and Boy's Club at the
Bushard School Site
2. Pool facility for handicapped and community $220,000
swim complex at Oceanview High School
3. Loan to Human Resources Council Day Care Center $ 38,000
4. Facilities to increase the mobility of handi- $ 53,000
capped persons
5. Assistance to the Orange County Housing $ 10,000
Authority
6. Outdoor Recreation Facilities for the Senior $ 96,000
Citizen Center
-3- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 4
7. Storm Drain Project, Delaware Street, Adams to $154,000
Yorktown (Part A) '
8. Renovation and preservation of the Newland House $ 10,000
Total $690,000
The City Council will make its final decision on March 29, 1976.
The Planning Commission was requested to either endorse the
Committee's recommendation or to `add `or delete projects' they
felt were more in keeping with community development needs of the
City.
Tom Moseley addressed the Commission and discussed the Housing
Assistance Plan. He cited the need for assisted housing in Huntington
Beach and reported the'second year assisted housing goals that were
approved by the Committee. These goals are:
49 existing house' units to 'be`' leased under -the 'Sectiofi' 8
rent subsidy program and set aside for large families
383 existing housing units to be leased under the'Section,8.
program and set aside for all other families
185 new units to be constructed for elderly and handicapped
households
He also pointed out that while these goals do not meet the total
current need for assisted housing, the actual number of units allo-
cated to Huntington Beach will probably be less.
Kathy Manulkin, Chairman'of the CAC,'addressed'the Commission and
reitterated the projects that were recommended for approval by
the citizens' committee, citing'tremendous'citizen support for
these projects, and pointing out their importance:`She'�urged the
Commission to endorse the'Committee's''recommended programs.-
The Commission addressed questions on the priorities to the Community
Development representatives and staff. Questions were addressed to
Brian Parkinson, Planning Commission's CAC representative, concerning
proposed pool for the handicapped community'swimming complex to be
located at Oceanview High School.
The public hearing was opened:"
Dr. Altimari, Huntington Beach Union High School District, discussed
the need for the swimming complex at Oceanview.High School. He
pointed out the willingness of the high school district to enter
into a joint sponsorship of the pool complex and pointed out that
although no formal agreements had been reached with the City there
11
1
-4- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesdays March 2, 1976
Page 5
was a desire to participate in the funding and operation of the
project on the part of the High School District and matters would
be going before the School Board prior to the Council meeting on
March 29, 1976, and obviously some official support could be
presented. He pointed out that in light of recent construction
bid overages the amount of funding the School District could pro-
vide was not yet determined.
Police Chief Earle Robitaille addressed the Commission. He spoke
on behalf of the allocation for the Boy's Club and endorsed its
position as the first priority on the list.
Tom Whaling stated that he felt Item No. 15, Downtown Project
Consulting, should be a high priority item since it would bring
revenue to the City.
Frances Zohlman spoke in behalf of assistance to the handicapped.
Scot Flanagan spoke in favor of an olympic size pool in the area.
Herb Levy, Principal of the Bushard School, endorsed the Committee's
selection of the Boy's Club as the top priority project.
A. Spiegel pointed out the need for storm drains in the vicinity
of Christy Drive and Woodstock Lane. She stated that a letter
had been submitted to the City bearing signatures of the residents
in the area which requested the City to remedy the storm drain
problems.
Lee Mosteller, Chairman of Parks and Recreation Commission and
member of the Citizens Advisory Commission, addressed the Commission.
He discussed the needs for the swimming pool complex.
Bob Jarrard addressed the Commission on the subject of the storm
drains and the City's need to improve them.
The public hearing was closed.
There was a lengthy discussion on the merits of the swimming pool and
the size that would meet the needs of the community.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BAZIL THE COMMISSION ENDORSED
THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE WITH THE
QUALIFICATION_ THAT THE FIRST AND SECOND YEAR ENTITLEMENTS TOTALING
$325,000 BE THE MAXIlN1JM CONTRIBUTION_F_ROM HCD FUNDS USED TO CONSTRUCT A 25 METER
POOL AND NOT AN OLYMPIC SIZE FACILITY BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
Chairman Slates called a five minute recess at 9:35 P.M.
-5- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 6
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9235
Applicant: Buccella, Ong, Hollingsworth
This is a request for 23 lots on 6.4 acres of land east of Leslie
Lane, north and south of Dunbar Street, for the purpose of construct-
ing four-plex apartments.
Jim Palin addressed the Commission and noted that a map was on display.
He discussed the conditions of approval and presented a vugraph.
Frank Buccella, applicant, addressed the Commission and discussed
the plans.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BAZIL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9235,
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach -does
hereby find that the proposed subdivision, along with its
design and improvements, is consistent with general and
specific plans for the area in that:
1. The proposed subdivision of this 6.4 + acre parcel of
land zoned R2 (which allows 16 units per gross acre)
is proposed to be constructed having only 14.3 units
per gross acre.
2. The General Plan has set forth,provisions for this type
of land use as well as setting forth objectives for
implementation for this type of housing.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity
of land use at the time the land use designation for
low density residential was placed on said property.
4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all
other design and improvements features of the proposed
subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance
with standard plans and specifications on file with
the City, as well as in compliance with the State Map
and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The tentative map received and dated February 27, 1976,
shall be the approved layout.
2. The sewer and water and fire hydrant system shall be
designed to City standards.
-6- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, Maxcb 21 1976
Page 7
3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach water system.
4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach sewage system.
5. The property shall be subject to the local drainage
assessment district's requirements and fees.
6. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of
a final map. This system shall be designed to provide
for siltation and erosion control both during and after
construction of the project.
7. All required improvements shall be constructed under the
inspection and to the approval of the City Engineer.
Cost for the inspection shall be paid by the subdivider.
3-1/2 percent of the amount of the improvement bond shall
be posted with the City Engineer for inspection costs.
8. A six (6) ft. high masonry block wall shall be constructed
around the periphery of the development where such
property abuts property zoned for R1 uses.
9. The design on the termination and turnaround at the end
of Vineland Drive shall be subject to the Director of
Public Works approval action and shall include a radius
curb landscaping in the construction of a block wall.
10. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning,
the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be
a minimum of R-19 and R-11 respectively. If no air
conditioning is -to be provided, the insulation in
ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13
and R-7, respectively.
11. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe
and other surplus and unusable material shall be disposed
of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them.
12. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at
the locations of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be
stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water
heaters, and central heating.
13. An assessment of the archaeological conditions existing
on site shall be prepared by a qualified archeologist
and submitted to the Planning Commission for review and
approval action.
-7- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 8
14. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a
report indicating the ground surface acceleration for,
earth movement for the subject property and, in addition,
shall address the requirements of the Special Studies
Act.
15. All structures proposed for construction within this
subdivision shall be constructed in compliance with
the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report.
16. Calculations on footings and structural members to
withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to
the City for review.
17. A chemical analysis as well as tests for physical
properties of the soil on subject property shall be
submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance
of building -permits.
18. The developer shall participate in the Orange County,
Sanitation District applicable to subject property.
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-02
Applicant: Patricia G. Jackson
IN CONJUNCTION WITH:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-2
Applicant: Patricia G. Jackson
Conditional Exception No. 76-02 is a request for a reduction in the
required lot width on the proposed lots numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Lot number 5, a corner lot, has the required 65 feet of lot width.
Tentative Parcel Map 76-2 is a request to divide two existing parcels
of land into 5 individual lots. There are a total of 20 existing
units on the subject property with 4 units designated on"each pro-
posed lot.
John Cope addressed the Commission and briefly discussed the staff
report.
Chairman Slates opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception
76-02. There was no one present to speak in favor of or opposition
to this application, so Chairman Slates closed the public hearing.
-8- 3/2/76 -,PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 9
Commission discussion ensued on both applications.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BAZIL CONDITIONAL
EXCEPTION NO. 76-02 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 76-2 WERE APPROVED
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITION OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 76-02
The existing driveway approach servicing the common access way
easement shall be increased from the existing width to reflect a
25 foot approach measured from the top of the X.
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 76-02
1. The proposed division of land is consistent with the adopted
General Plan Land Use Element objectives and the existing
zoning adopted by the City.
2. The subject site and existing structures are suitable for the
design of the proposed divsion of land.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 76-2
1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Planning Department
dated January 30, 1976 shall be the approved layout.
2. A final parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Public
Works and shall be approved by the City Council and recorded
with the Orange County Recorder.
3. A copy of the recorded parcel map and a copy of the recorded
25 foot reciprocal driveway providing for access over each and
every parcel shall be filed with the Planning Department.
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7743
Subdivider: George A. Armstrong
This is a request to permit a revision to a previously approved
subdivision. The original approval was for 8 lots. The revised
map indicates 10 single family residential lots. This requested
revision is in response to concerns expressed by the surrounding
property owners. The applicant is attempting to provide standard
60 ft. wide lots and also to design the subdivision so as to
afford the greatest amount of preservation of the view presently
existing for the residents to the east.
John Cope addressed the Commission and reviewed the history of
this application. He discussed the suggested conditions of approval.
-9- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutest H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesdays March 21 11976
Page 10
George Armstrong, applicant, addressed the Commission and read a
letter written by surrounding property owners requesting the approval
of the revised map. He expressed appreciation to the Planning Depart-
ment for their efforts in working with iiim to obtain a better plan.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY KERINS AND SECOND BY BOYLE TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7743
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the policies
and objectives of the adopted General Plan Land Use
Element.
2. The design, layout, and proposed improvements are in
conformance with the State Map Act, City Subdivision
ordinance, and applicable standard plans and specifi-
cations on file with the City. � '
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The tentative map received and dated February 24, 1976
shall be the approved layout.
2. The sewer and water and fire hydrant system shall be
designed to City standards.
3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach water system.
4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach sewage system.
5. The property shall be subject to the local drainage
assessment district's requirements and fees.
6. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of
a final map. This system shall be designed to provide
for siltation and erosion control both during and after
construction of the project.
7. Street sections shall be determined by the soil's R
value and by the traffic index.
8. All required improvements shall be constructed under
the inspection and to the approval of the City Engineer.
Three and one-half percent (3-1/2%) of the amount of the
improvement bond shall be posted with the City Engineer
for inspection costs.
1
-10- 3/2/76 - pc
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 11
9. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a
report indicating the ground surface acceleration for
earth movement for the subject property. The report
shall be in conformance with the requirements of the
Special Studies Act.
10. All structures proposed for construction within this
subdivision shall be constructed in compliance with the
g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report.
11. Calculations on footings and structural members to
withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted
to the City for review.
12. A chemical analysis as well as tests for physical
properties of the soil on subject property shall be
submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance
of building permits.
13. The developer shall participate in the Orange County
Sanitation District applicable to subject property.
14. A six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall incorp-
orating a combination of landscape planting to miti-
gate the impact of the wall along Warner Avenue shall
be constructed in a five (5) foot landscape easement
along Warner Avenue. The plan for such screening wall
and landscaping method shall be submitted to the Plan-
ning Department and the Department of Public Works for
review and approval prior to submitting the final map
to the City Council for acceptance. Measurement of
the height of said wall shall be from finished grade
of the property lines along Warner Avenue.
15. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning,
the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall
be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no
air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in
ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13
and R-7, respectively. The CC&R's on the subject
property shall reflect such an insulation provision.
16. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at
the locations of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall
be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities,
water heaters, and central heating units. The CC&R's
on the subject property shall indicate such an energy
source provision.
-11- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 12
17. A copy of the CC&R's on the subject property shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval prior to submittal of the final map to the
City Council for acceptance. Specific provisions which
will prohibit any structure (including landscaping)
from exceeding thirty-six (36) inches in height in the
designated view corridor and open space areas shall be
provided. The height measurement of such structures
and landscaping shall be from the finished grade of
Marina View Drive.
18. All structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height
shall set back a minimum of five (5) feet from the 25 foot
view corridor easement which is located on lot number 8.
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle,"Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 75-4 "A"
"REWRITE OF LOW DENSITY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT" -
ARTICLE 931
Jim Palin stated that an addendum had been prepared for deletions,
additions, and corrections, and suggested that the addendum be
read and discussed.
There was a discussion on club house facilities, the size, and
problems some developers were experiencing. Also there was a
discussion on density.
The public hearing was opened. There being no one to speak for
or against this Code Amendment, the public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY BAZIL AND SECOND BY BOYLE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 75-4"A"
WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle
NOES: Kerins
ABSENT: Shea
Commissioner Kerins stated that he would like for it to be made
a matter of record that he voted in opposition to Code Amendment,
No. 75-4 "A" because he felt that 6 1/2 units per gross acre is
too high a density. He felt the City should be lowering the
density rather than raising it.
- 1- 1/1)17F - ID I-
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 13
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 75-4 "B"
"REWRITE OF HIGH DENSITY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT" -
ARTICLE 936
There was a discussion on continuing this to allow time to draft
into ordinance form.
ON MOTION BY KERINS AND SECOND BY PARKINSON CODE AMENDMENT
NO. 75-4 "B" WAS CONTINUED TO MARCH 16, 1976, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 76-2
"OIL CODE" - ARTICLE 968
Code Amendment No. 76-2proposed to amend Article 968 by repealing
reference for redrilling from existing provisions of the Ordinance
Code and to amend by rewording the definition section 9681(f) to
allow a side track operation beyond the extremities or sides of an
existing bore casing. This amendment is also to repeal the definition
of redrilling as contained within Section 2301 of the Oil Code.
The Chairman opened the public hearing. There being no one present
to speak for or against this code amendment, the Chairman closed
the public hearing.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 76-2
WAS APPROVED BY 'CHE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Boyle, Kerins
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
MISCELLANEOUS:
None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
A letter from J. E. Gerspach, Division Chief in the Fire Department,
concerning high rise building fire protection requirements was
received and filed.
-13- 3/2/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 2, 1976
Page 14
COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS:
Chairman Slates commended Commissioner Parkinson for his work with
the Citizens Advisory Committee.
STAFF'S COMMENTS:
John O'Connor discussed pending bills in the legislature.
Secretary Harlow discussed the action of City Council's meeting
on March 1, 1976.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chairman Slates adjourned the meeting at 11:15 p.m. to a joint
meeting of City Council and Project Area Committee on Wednesday,
March 3, 1976, in Room B8 of Civic Center at 8:00 p.m.
chard A. Harlow Roger Slates
Secretary Chairman
1
-14- 3/2/76 - PC