HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-09-08 (7)APPROVED
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLA14NING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 - 7:00 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Boyle, Newman
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Commissioner Shea was excused from the
meeting.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY NEWMAN THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 17
AND AUGUST 24, 1976 WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED BY THE.FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
SCHEDULED ITEMS:
GENERAL PLAN DOCUMENT/LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO, 76-2
Chairman Slate:. stated that the staff had recommended approval
of Negative Declaration 76-78, adoption of General Plan Amendment
76-2, miscellaneous changes to the Land use Element, and a continuance
of the General Plan document to the November 16, 1976 meeting.
Viewqraphs were presented of the following areas of concern
by Tom Moseley:
2.1 SOUTH OF MAIN STREET AND EAST OF FLORIDA STREET
This is a request by William P. Helm to change the land use desig-
nation from office professional to high density residential. The
staff recommended no change.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on this area, and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE COMMISSION SUSTAINED
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO LEAVE THE PROPERTY GENERAL PLANNED
OFFICE PROFESSIONAL BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: bone
ABSENT: Shea
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 2
2.2 NORTH OF WARNER AVENUE WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD
This is a request by Foxx Development Corporation to change the
land use designation from office professional and retail commercial
to high density residential. The staff recommended that it be re-
designated high density residential.
Chairman Slates stated that he would abstain on this area since
there might be a conflict of interest. He then turned the chair
over to Vice Chairman Gibson.
Vice Chairman Gibson opened the public hearing.
There was no one present to speak on this area. The public hearing
was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSO_N AND SECONDBY BOYLE THECOMMISSION RE-
DESIGNATED AREA 2.2 y FROM OFFICE_ PROFESSIONAL_ AND RETAIL -COMMERCIAL--
TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY-THEFOLLOWING-VOTE- - --
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Slates
ABSENT: Shea
2.3 NORTH OF CLAY AVENUE AND EAST OF GOLDENWEST STREET
3
This is a request to change the land use designation from planning
reserve to light industrial and medium density residential. This was
initiated by the staff of the Planning Department.
Y
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on
this area and the public hearing was closed.
A_.MOTION WAS MADE BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY SLATES TO REDESIGNATE
AREA_2.3FROM PLANNING RESERVE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL.
Commissioner Gibson inquired as to the background of the planning
reserve designation for this area. Acting Secretary Selich stated
that a previous Amendment had reflected a recommendation for medium
density residential for this area, but the City Council had re-
quested that it be given furtrier study. As a result of this request,
the Land Use Study was made.
Commissioner Finley stated that since many of the requests for re -
designation were based on the Industrial Land Use Study, a document
which had not yet been reviewed by the City Council, t>',,e would not
be in favor of changing the designation until the Council's
reaction to the Study has been determined.
-2- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 3
Commissioner Parkinson concurred with Commissioner Finley, He
stated that the Industrial Land Use Inventory showed this area
as being one of 'the lowest priorities for industrial development.
He felt that it should be kept in planning reserve until it could
be further evaluated.
VOTE:
AYES: Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson
ABSENT: Shea
THE MOTION FAILED.
There was a discussion between staff and Commission as to what
method would be used to transmit the information to the City
Council.
Chairman Slates stated
that he felt it was unfair to the property
owners in that area
to
hold up development of their property
with the planning reserve
designation.
Commissioner Finley
stated
that she would be willing to change her
vote to allow it to
be
transmitted to City Council.
ON MOTION BY FINLEY
AND
SECOND BY PARKINSON THE COMMISSION RECONSIDERE
THE PREVIOUS MOTION
BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY SLATES THE COMMISSION REDESIGNATED
AREA 2.3 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES:. Finley, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: Parkinson, Gibson
ABSENT: Shea
Commissioner Finley requested that the record show that her only
reason for an affirmative vote was to allow staff to transmit to
City Council.
2.4 NORTH OF CLAY AVENUE AND EAST OF GOLDENWEST STREET
This is a request initiated by W. Sterling Buck and Associates to
change the land use designation from industrial to high density
residential. The staff iucommended no change in land use designation.
Chairman Slates noted that a lengthy petition h^d been submitted
to the Commission requesting that this land be designated for low
density.
-3-
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 4
W. S. Buck addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the
changing of the designation to low density residential. He felt
that leaving the designation as it is constitutes spot zoning in
a residential area. He noted that the petition had been amended
and changed to request low density residential rather than
previously requested high density residential.
Leroy Collins, developer of a shopping center on the corner of
Beach and Talbert, spoke in favor of low density designation.
Barbara Horowitz stated that she was the one who had circulated
the petition. She suggested that Chairman Slates poll the
audience. Chairman Slates requested that those in favor of low
density so indicate by raising their hands. He noted for the
record that a sizeable number of persons in the audience were in
favor of the low density designation.
The public hearing was closed.
Acting Secretary Selich stated that existing Council policy for
the area is reflected in the Taylor/Beach Specific Plan which
designated the area industrial.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE COMMISSION RE-
DESIGNATED AREA 2.4 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AS CHANGED IN THE
REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
Acting Secretary Selich stated that if this area becomes low
density, the City should go north and take in all the smal_1_ lot
areas west of the commercially designated properties on
Beach Boulevard.
By minute action the Commission recommended that the industrial
small lot area, as designated by Acting Secretary Selich, be put
into the next amendment.
The Chairman called a two minute recess at 8:00 p.m. `
2.5 NORTH OF TALBERT AVENUE AND WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD
This is a request by Buccella Engineering for a change in land
use designation from light industrial to medium density resi-
dential. The staff recommended that no change be made in
designation and that it remain light industrial.
1
-4- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 5
The public hearing was opened.
Frank Buccella addressed the Commission and reviewed the reasons
why he felt the property should be designated R2. He stated
that at one time Beach Boulevard and the proposed freeway made it a
good industrial area but that those have been deleted. He further
stated that the railroad which is about a block or so away from
the property might have been an important consideration at one
time but no longer is used as much as it formerly was. He noted
that other uses in the Gothard Industrial Corridor seem to be
marginal with wrecking yards and other uses that are not really
attractive for the City.
The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued. Commissioner Finley stated that she
felt Mr. Buccella had some good arguments in favor of his request
but that she still felt the Industrial Land Use Study will have
to be looked at more closely and reaction from the City Council
obtained.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY AREA 2.5 WILL REMAIN
DESIGNATED AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO OBTAIN
FURTHER INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE REDESIGNATION WOULD AFFECT THE
ADJACENT AREAq, TO BE_HEARD ON NOVEMBER 16._ 1976.IN CONNECTION
WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AMENaNaU 76-3 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
2.6 NORTH OF SLATER AVENUE AND WEST OF GOTHARD STREET
This is a request by Robert L. Stellrecht for a change of light
industrial to low density residential designation. The staff
recommended a portion be redesignated low density residential.
The public hearing was opened.
Bob Stellrecht stated that he would be glad to answer any questions.
The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON A PORTION OF AREA 2.6
WAS REDESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley,
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
-5- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 6
2.7 SOUTH OF HEIL AVENUE AND GOTHARD STREET
This is a request by CELS Corporation to redesignate the area
from light industrial to low density residential. The staff
recommended no change.
The public hearing was opend.
Tallas Margrave, President of CELS Corporation, spoke in favor of
the redesignation. He stated that in Huntington Beach and Orange
County there is a tremendous demand for Rl_property which is
selling at a higher price than either R2 or R3. He further noted
that neither the developer, the owner, the prospective owner,
nor property owners in the area wanted this property to remain
in the M1 designation. He stated that a petition signed by ad-
jacent property owners objecting to the M1 designation was on
file.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY NEWMAN TO APPROVE
CHANGE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO R1 ON THE BASIS THAT SURROUNDING
AREAS ARE RESIDENTIAL'AND IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO BUFFER
ADEQUATELY THE INDUSTRIAL USE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL.
Acting Secretary Selich stated that the City Council is going to
have to look very carefully at the Industrial Land Use Study the
Planning Department has made and come up with some reasonable
policy on evaluating these General Plan requests.
Commissioner Finley stated that she felt there are some natural
buffers insofar as this site is concerned such as the flood
control channel and railroad track on the other side of Gothard.
She stated that she would not want to remove this area from
industrial zoning, but would like to have the City Council look
at the study.
There was a discussion on when the Industrial Land Use Study would
be transmitted. Although the staff had originally planned to
transmit the document to the City Council along with the General
Plan, it was the consensus of the Commission that this document
should be transmitted as soon as possible.
VOTE:
AYES: Boyle, Slates
NOES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman
ABSENT: Shea
THE MOTION FAILED.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY AREA 2.7 REMAINED
DESIGNATED AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUT WILL BE REVIEWED 'S PART OF
THE THIRD AMENDMENT ON NOVEMBER 16, 1976 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 197E
Page 7
2.8 SOUTH OF EDINGER AVENUE AND WEST OF GOTHARD STREET
This is a request by Ashwill-Burke & Co. for a redesignation from
light industrial to commercial retail. The staff recommended a
portion be redesignated commercial retail.
The public hearing was opened.
A representative of the applicant addressed the Commission and
stated that he was in agreement with the staff's recommendation.
The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY FINLEY A PORTION OF AREA 2.8 WAS
REDESIGNATED COMMERCIAL RETAIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
2.9 NORTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD
This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to
redesignate Area 2.9 from medium density residential to commercial
retail.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on this area. The public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY FINLEY AREA 2.9 WAS REDESIGNATED
AS COMMERCIAL RETAIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
2.10 NORTH OF ADAMS AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD
This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to
redesignate Area 2.10 from commercial retail to open space.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION -BY SKATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.10 WAS REDESIG -
NATED OPEN SPACE BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman,,;Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
-7- 9/8/76 - PC
4ingtes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 8
2.11 NORTH OF UTICA AVENUE AND WEST OF LAKE STREET
This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to
redesignate this area from Government Center to medium density
residential
The public hearing was opened and there was no one present to
speak on this area. The public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.11 WAS REDESIG-
NATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley,'Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
2.12 EAST OF BROOKHURST STREET AND NORTH OF HAMILTON AVENUE
This is a request by Arthofer and Howard Development Co. for a
redesignation from commercial retail to medium density residential.
The Planning staff has recommended that it be redesignated low
density residential.
Acting Secretary Selich stated that the staff had been influenced
in its decision on redesignation to low density by the fact that
a number of high density uses already are adjacent to the area
and the Greenbelt Commission recommended low density.
The public hearing was opened.
Jerry Bame addressed the Commission and stated that the property
owners have spared no effort in past years in trying to sell the
property with the commercial zoning, but that it is just not a
viable commercial piece of property. He further stated that
the owners felt R2 would be conducive to development of this
area and were requesting medium density residential.
Mr. Leonard Muskin spoke in favor of redesignation to medium
density.
The public hearing was closed.
Chairman Slates stated he would have no argument with medium
density residential but if it ever comes up for a zone change
he would want it,to be with a PD suffix.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.12 WAS RE-
DESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
-8- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 9
2.13.1 EAST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET AND SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE
This is a request by Crosman Advertising Company for a re -
designation from low density residential to medium density
residential. The staff recommended that it be redesignated
medium density residential.'
The public hearing was opened.
Barbara Baker spoke in favor of the area remaining low density.
Sandra Bunsch, a resident of the area, spoke in favor of low
density for the area.
Frank Buccella spoke in favor of redesignation to medium density
residential.
The public hearing was closed.
Chairman Slates stated that he felt the area merited a more
detailed study of the residential uses in the area.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE AREA 2.13.1 WAS CONTINUED
TO THE NOVEMBER 16, 1976 MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
2.13.2 WEST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET AND SOUTH OF WARNER
This is a request by Richard Annigoni for redesignation from low
density residential to medium density residential. The staff
recommended it be redesignated medium density residential.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on this area and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Gibson stated that he would not be in favor of this
redesignation since the flight pattern from Meadowlark Airport
is over the area. He also cited the deficiency in park and open
space areas as a reason for his not being in favor of the re-
designatign.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON 2.13.2 WAS REDESIGNATED
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: Gibson
ABSENT: Shea
-9- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 10
2.14 EAST OF "B" STREET AND SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE
This is a request by Henry H. Uyekawa for-redesignation from com-
mercial retail to medium density residential. The staff recommended
redesignation of medium density residential.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on this area and the public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE AREA 2.14 WAS REDESIGNATED
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
2.15 SOUTH OF ALDRICH AVENUE AND WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD
This is a request by Tarbell Realtors to redesignate commercial
retail to high density residential. Staff recommended it be re-
designated high density residential.
The public hearing was opened.
George Hanna spoke 4gainst the redesignation to high density,
stating that he bought the property as a commercial piece of
property and wanted it to remain as such.
Juan Estrada stated that he had owned lots for ten years in the
area and it cannot be developed as commercial. He requested
high density residential designation.
The public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY NEWMAN AREA 2.15 WAS REDESIGNATED
TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman
NOES: Boyle
ABSENT: Shea
2.16 SOUTH OF SAN DIEGO FREEWAY AND EAST OF SAN ANGELO DRIVE
This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to
redesignate the area from planning reserve to high density resi-
dential.
Chairman Slates stated that this property is presently in litigation.
For this reason he felt it should be continued.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one preset_: to speak
on this area and the public hearing was closed.
-10- 9/8/76 - PC
1
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesdayf September 8,.1976
Page 11
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.16 WAS CONTINUED
TO NOVEMBER 16, 1976 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE THE GENERAL PLAN DOCUMENT
WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1976 TO PERMIT FURTHER
REFINEMENT OF SECTIONS 4.0 AND 5.0 BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE.
2MS : Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
76-78 WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
76-2 WAS APPROVED AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea, Finley
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE THE STAFF WAS REQUESTED TO
ALTER ENVIRONEMENTAL ASSESSMENT TO REFLECT PLANNING COMMISSION
MODIFICATION OF THE AMENDMENT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: _Parkinson, Gibson, Slates, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Finley,'Newman, Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON RESOLUTIONV 1175, A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN 76-2, WAS ADOPTED BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea, Newman
-11- 9/8/77 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 12
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-18
Applicant: Walt Babcock
This is a request for development of a racquetball club on the
southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Sims Street.
The Planning Commission at its meeting of July 27, 1976 discussed
the above referenced application. The staff recommended a con-
tinuance on the matter so as -to allow a readvertising of the legal
notice, and to allow completion of research as to the legal status
of the subject parcels. This has been completed and the parcels
determined to be accurately plotted on the site plan.
The public hearing was opened.
R. Geroci, whose parents own property across the street from the
proposed racquetball club, addressed the Commission and stated
that he did not know this type of development would be allowed
in R3 zone. He was advised by the Commission that it was a
legal use for the property.
The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 76-18 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS'
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed plan substantially complies with the applicable
ordinance code requirements.
2. The proposed design and layout of the facilities will provide for
a compatible land use with the adjacent residential properties.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The site plan dated June 10, 1976 shall be the approved layout.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, building elevations
indicating colors and materials shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for review and approval.
3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a landscape plan shall
be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Developmen
for review and approval.
-12- 9/8/76 - PC ,;
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8,'1976
Page 13
4. The hours of operation shall be limited from 7:O0 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
5. The developer shall participate in the local drainage assessment
district.
6. Warner Avenue and Sims Street shall be dedicated and improved as
required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
7. A parcel map showing elimination of all interior property lines shall
be recorded with the County Recorder's Office prior to occupancy
of the use.
$. A six (6) foot high wall shall be installed on the southerly and
easterly property lines. The design and materials of said wall
shall be subject to approval by the Planning Department.
9. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation
Annexation District No. 11 requirements and fees.
AYES: Parki.ns4n, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-17
Applicant: T. J. Hennes, Gold Bar Stables
In Conjunction With
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-08
Applicant: Ted Hennes, Gold Bar Stables
Conditional Use Permit No. 76-17 is a request to permit the
continuance of an existing commercial horse stable in an area
located on the southwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Ellis
Avenue.
Conditional Exception No. 76-08 is a request to permit encroach-
ments into the required front, exterior side, interior side, and
rear yard setbacks.
A vugraph was shown.
John Cope addressed the Commission and stated that several
modifications had to be made to the existing facilities.
The public hearing was opened.
Ted Hennes, applicant, addressed the Commission, and discussed
the hay stack removal. There was a discussion on meeting parking
requirements.
-13- 9/8/76 PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 14
The public hearing was closed.
It was the consensus of the Commission that further work should
be completed on the plans prior to consideration.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 76-17 AND,CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-08 WERE CONTINUED
TO SEPTEMBER 21, 1976 BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
Commissioner Gibson stated that he would like to see what has been
done on the other horse stables and requested that the staff
provide a report on this.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9468
Subdivider: Wonacott, Shah & Panchal
In Conjunction With
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-23
Applicant: Wonacott, Shah & Panchal, Inc.
Tentative Tract 9468 in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No.
76-23, filed on July 21, 1976, is a request to allow a 40-unit
Planned Residential Development on a 3.69+ acre parcel of land.
Subject property is located at the southeast corner of Heil Avenue
and Algonquin Street.
Architectural renderings were displayed.
Chairman Slates opened the public hearing on Conditional Use
Permit No. 76-23 and solicited testimony on Tentative Tract 9468.
Mr. Panchal addressed the Commission and expressed appreciation
for the cooperation obtained from the Staff.
The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SLATES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 76-23 WAS APPROVED WITH TH_E TOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
-14- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 15
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan received and dated September 1, 1976 shall be the
approved layout of the 40 unit condominium development.
2. All utilities shall be installed underground.
3. All details and amenities of the development as shown on the
site plans submitted for approval shall be constructed within
this development, such as the recreational building, swimming
pool, a jacuzzi, etc., as well as those areas within the
pedestrian and vehicular circulation to be constructed with
stamped concrete to aesthetically improve the project.
4. The exterior elevations of all buildings proposed for construction
within the project shall comply with the architectural design of
the unit submitted in conjunction with the site plan and tentative
map.
5. If the developer chooses to build with a modified sidewalk
section pursuant to the most recent standards on file with the
Department of Public Works, a landscaping maintenance agreement
shall be entered into -and approved by the City prior to the
recordation of a final map.
6. The CC & R's and association rules shall set forth provisions for
the exclusive use of those open parking spaces immediately ad-
jacent to the units intended to serve and as delineated upon the
site plan received and dated September 1, 1976 and shall provide
for common use of all other open parking spaces.
7. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the
insulation in the ceiling and exterior wall shall be a minimum
of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be
provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be
a minimum.of R-13 and R-7, respectively.
8. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus and unusable material shall be disposed of at an off
site facility equipped to handle them.
9. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the lo-
cation of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the
location of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central
heating units.
10. The structures on subject property, whether attached or detached,
shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical
standards as set forth for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL
contour of subject property.
-15- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 16
11. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report
indicating the surface acce,lleration for earth movement for
subject property.
12. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand
anticipated-g factors shall be submitted to the City for review
prior to issuance of building permits.
13. All structures proposed for construction within this subdivision
shall be constructed in compliance with the g factor calculations
and chemical and physical soils analysis.
14. Community antenna facilities shall be installed by developer
in compliance with specifications as set forth in Resolution
No. 4281 adopted by the City Council July 19, 1976.
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON TENTATIVE TRACT 9468
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
find that the proposed subdivision, along with its design and improve-
ments, is consistent with general and specific plans for the area
in that:
1. The proposed subdivision of this 3.69+ acre parcel of land zoned
R-2 (which allows 15 units per gross acre) is proposed to be
constructed having only 10.8 units -per gross acre.
2. The General Plan has.set forth provisions for this type of land
use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation
for this type of housing.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land
use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density
residential was placed on said property.
4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all other
design and improvements features of the proposed subdivision
are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard
plans and specifications on file with the City, as well as in
compliance with the State Map and supplementary City Sub-
division Ordinance.
-16- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 17
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The Tentative Tract Map received and dated September 1, 1976
shall be the approved layout.
2. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant system shall be subject to
City standards.
3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
water system.
4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach's sewage system.
5. The property shall be subject to local drainage assessment
requirements and fees.
6. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department
of Public or
prior to the recordation of a final map. This
system shall be designed to provide for siltation erosion control
both during and after construction of the project.
7. All required improvements shall be constructed under the super-
vision of and to the approval of the City Engineer. Costs for
the inspection shall be paid by the subdivider. 3'-1/3 percent
of the amount of the improvement bond shall be posted with the
City Engineer for construction costs.
8. A 45 inch RCP storm line and catch basin shall be constructed
at the intersection of Heil Avenue and Algonquin Street.
9. Vehicular access rights to Heil Avenue shall be dedicated to
the City of Huntington Beach except at street intersections.
Vehicular access rights to Algonquin Street shall be dedicated
to the City of Huntington Beach except at the two driveways
as shown upon the plan received and dated September 1, 1976.
10. The off -site improvement of Sells Circle, Heil Avenue, and
Algonquin Street shall be dedicated and improved to City stand-
ards and specifications on file with the Department of Public
Works.
-11. Developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation
Annexation District 11 requirements and fees.
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
-17- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 18
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9481
Applicant: L. D..Zehnder
Engineer: Emerald Engineering
Tentative Map No. 9481 filed on August 3, 1976 is a request to
subdivide approximately a 1.9 acre of land into a 6 lot medium
density subdivision.
Subject property is located at the southeast corner of Delaware
Street and Yorktown Avenue.
There was a discussion on the conditions of approval.
A vugraph was shown.
The applicant, L. D. Zehnder, presented plans for viewing by
Commission.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND,BY GIBSON NEGATIVE DECLARATION 76-70
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9481
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
find that the proposed subdivision, along with its design and improve-
ments, is consistent with general and specific plans for the area in
that:
1. The proposed subdivision of this 1.9+ acre parcel of land zoned
R-2 (which allows 15 units per gross acre) is proposed to be
constructed having only 12.1 units per gross acre.
2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land
use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this
type of housing.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use
at the time the land use designation for Medium Density residential
was placed on said property.
-18- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 19
4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all other design
and improvements features of the proposed subdivision are proposed
to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications
on file with the City, as well as in compliance with the State Map
Act and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The tentative map received and dated August 27, 1976 shall be the
approved layout.
2. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant system shall be designed to
City standards.
3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
water system.
4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
sewage system.
5. The property shall be subject to local drainage assessment district
requirements and fees.
6. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department
of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. This
system shall be designed to provide for siltation and erosion
control both during and after construction of the project.
7. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation
District #3 sewer annex district.
8. 'Vehicular access rights along Delaware Street and Yorktown Avenue
shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach.
9. All utilities shall be installed underground.
10. A decorative masonry wall shall be constructed to City specifications
along Lot 1, which sides onto Delaware Street. Said wall shall be
six inches wide and six feet high. The height of said wall shall
be measured from whichever side is higher at finished grade.
The architectural design of said wall shall be approved by the
Planning Department. The structural design shall be approved
by the Department of Public Works and shall be included as part
of the street improvement plans.
11. A landscape planter shall be provided at the intersections of
Delaware Street and Yorktown Avenue and at the end of section
of England Street and Yorktown Avenue. Such planter shall conform
to the plans and specifications on file in the Department of
Public Works and to the requirement of the Plann:L..g Commission.
It is the developer's responsibility to landscape such planters
and provide irrigation facilities in conformance with the Depart-
ment of Public Works specifications and requirements.
-19- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 20
12. A fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed
by the developer atzlocations and specifications provided by the
Fire' Department.
13. The exterior elevations on buildings to be constructed on Lots
1 and 4 shall be subject to approval by the Planning Department.
The intent of this requirement is to improve the street scene
by having the developer provide architectural features and
variations of building materials on exterior faces of buildings
that are viewed from an arterial highway.
14. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation
in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11,
respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation
in ceilings.and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7,
respectively.
15. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other
surplus and unusable material shall be deposited in an off -site
facility equipped to handle them.
16. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at locations
of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at locations
of surface units, cooking facilities, water heaters and central
heating units.
17. The,structuras on subject property, whether attached or detached,
shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical
standards set forth for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL
contour of the property.
18, Community antenna facilities shall be installed by developer in
compliance with specifications as set forth in Resolution 4281,
adopted by.the City Council July 9, 1976.
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-31
Applicant: Rodney B. Lauter
In Conjunction With
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-07
Applicant: Rodney B. Lauter
Tentative Parcel -Map -No. 76-31 in conjunction with Conditional
Exception 76-07, filed on July 30, 1976, is a request t., allow
a 110 ft. parcel to be subdivided into two parcels having 55 ft.
frontage in lieu of the 60 ft. as required by the Ordinance Code.
-20- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 21
Subject property is located on the west side of Delaware Street,
approximately 170 ft. north of Yorktown Ave.
Jim Palin stated that he had nothing to add to the suggested
conditions of approval contained in the staff report.
The public hearing was opened on both applications.
Rodney Lauter addressed the Commission and stated that he was
prepared to answer any questions.
The public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 76-07 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
1. The size, shape, and location of the property is such that the
existing surrounding uses to the north, west, and south make the
property impossible to develop in 'any other configuration than
what has been requested by this conditional exception as it is
currently impossible to provide street access along the south
or west property lines of subject property.
2. This request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare of the community as the development proposed upon this
155 ft. parcel is proposed at a less intensity than all surrounding
uses and there are more than 15 parcels within 600 ft. having less
frontage than what is being proposed by this request. -
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 76-31 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:-
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does
hereby find that the proposed subdivision along with its design
improvements is consistent with General and Specific Plans in
the area in that:
a. The proposed subdivision of this 1.39+ acre parcel of land
zoned R-2, which allows 15 units per gross acre, is proposed
to be constructed having only 8.5 units per gross acre.
-21- 9/8/76 - PC --
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 22
b. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of
land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation
of this type of housing.
C. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land
use at the time the land use designation for medium density
residential was placed on subject property.
d. The lot size, depths, street widths and all other design im-
provement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed
to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and speci-
fications on file with the City as well as in compliance with
State Map Act and supplementary City subdivision ordinances.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The Tentative Parcel Map received and dated July 30, 1976 shall
be the approved layout.
2. A.parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department
of Public Works and recorded with the County Recorder.
3. Delaware Street shall be dedicated to City standards at the time
the parcels arc developed.
4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water
system at the time said parcels are developed.
5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
sewage system at the time said parcels are developed.
6. Ail utilities shall be installed underground at the time said
parcels are developed.
7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances.
8. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment
district at the time said parcels are developed.
9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Planning
Department.
10. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington
Beach on Delaware except at the location of the private drive to
serve both parcels as shown upon the parcel map received and dated
July 30, 1976.
11. Reciprocal drive easements shall be provided across the southerly
portion of the northerly lot and across the northerly portion of
the southerly lot to provide vehicular ingress and egress for both
parcels over the common drive.
-22- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 81 1976
Page 23 r ,1.976
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 76-36
Applicant: Robert J. Eadie
In Conjunction With
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-09
Applicant: Robert J. Eadie
Tentative Parcel Map No. 76-36 is a request to permit a two lot
division of land located on the southwest corner of Huntington
Avenue at Springfield Avenue.
Conditional Exception No. 76-09 is a request for reduction of
2.5' on corner lot which requires 65' total width in lieu of
Section 9162.2
John Cope stated that he had no information to add to that con-
tained in the staff report.
The public -hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on these applications and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NO. 76-79 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY NEWMAN CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 76-09 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-09 - FINDINGS:
1. The reduction in lot width of 2.5 feet and in the lot area of
20 square feet is not significant and will not be detrimental
to surrounding properties. This conclusion is based on the fact
that the usual lot width for similar developments is 54 feet.
2. The exception will allow the property owner the use of a portion
of his property for the same purpose as the other properties which
are not encumbered by resource production.
'AYES: Parkinson, Finley_, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
-NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
-23- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 24
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY NEWMAN TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 76-36 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-36 - FINDINGS:
1. The proposed division of land is consistent with the adopted General
Plan Land Use Element objectives and the existing z.Dning adopted
by the City.
2. The subject site and existing structures are suitable for the site
of the proposed division of land.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-36 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCELS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.
1. The -tentative parcel map received by the Planning Department
on August 24, 1976 shall be the approved layout.
2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by, the Department
of.Public Works, and recorded with the Orange County Recorder.
3. Huntington -Street and Springfield Avenue shall be dedicated
to City standards at the time'said parcels are developed.
4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
water system at the time said parcels are developed.
5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
sewage system -at the time said parcels are developed.
6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment
district at the time said parcels are developed.
7. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the
Planning Department.
8. Huntington Street and Springfield Avenue shall be fully improved
as required by the Department of Public Works prior to the
occupancy or use of Parcel No. 1 for any purpose.
9. A six (6) foot high solid fence shall be provided on the property
line separating the two parcels prior to the occupancy or use
of Parcel No. 1 for any purpose.
AYES: Parkinson, Finldy, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
-24- 9/8/76 - PC
I
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 25
PRECISE'PLAN.'OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-5
This is a request to precisely plan a sixty (60) ft. local street
commencing from Nashville Avenue and continuing northerly to
Oswego Avenue and to precise plan two alleys commencing from
Nashville Avenue and continuing northerly to Oswego Avenue.
One such alley will be located approximately 125 ft. east of
Huntington St. and the other will be located approximately 125 ft.
west of Delaware Street.
The proposed precise plan will provide for a local north/south street
to be.between Nashville Ave. and Oswego Ave. The street will be a
56 ft. rightway located approximately 294 ft. east of the centerline
of Huntington Street. In addition, the proposal will precise plan
two north/south alleys, 20 ft. in width, and also located between
Nashville and Oswego Streets approximately 153 ft. east of the center-
line of Huntington Street and approximately 166 ft. west of the center-
line of Delaware Street.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on this Precise Plan of Street Alignment, and the public hearing
was closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO. 76-5 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY'BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON RESOLUTION NO. 1177;
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO. 76-5 TO PROVIDE FOR A NORTH/SOUTH 56 FOOT LOCAL
STREET AND TWO TWENTY FOOT ALLEYS LOCATED BETWEEN NASHVILLE AVENUE
AND OSWEGO AVENUE,BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman,'Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-7 - DOLORES STREET CUL-DE-SAC
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 76-7 is a proposal to cul-de-sac
the north end -of Dolores Street approximately 610 feet north of
Pearce Street.
Dolores Street is a local street located just east of Algonquin Street
between Heil and Warner Avenues. ,
-25- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes:- H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 26
It is intended that this proposed street alignment will provide a more,
efficient and safe circulation system within the immediate area.
The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak
on this Precise Plan of Street Alignment. The public hearing was
closed.
Commission discussion ensued.
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO. 76-7 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
to
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON RESOLUTION NO. 1176,
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO. 76-7 TO PROVIDE CUL-DE-SAC ON DOLORES STREET 610
FEET NORTH OF PEARCE STREET, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
MISCELLANEOi7S
LETTER FROM COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY DATED
AUGUST 24, 1976 CONCERNING ARTERIAL BIKEWAY ROUTE 17B
John Cope stated that the intent of this letter is to request the
Commission to determine the proposed project's conformity with
the General Plan.
ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY RESOLUTION NO. 1179
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINDING
THE PROPOSED PACIFIC COAST OFFROAD BIKEWAY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CITY'S GENERAL PLAN WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON SHIPLEY STREET
John Cope discussed a proposed residential development on Shipley Street
that will incorporate the previously discussed cul-de-sacing of Shipley
and thereby necessitate some additional dedications and vacations of
rights -of -way.
Chairman Slates stated that he would have to abstain on this item
and turned the meeting over to Vice Chairman Gibson.
-26- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 27
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE COMMISSION CONCURRED
THAT SAID VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
GENERAL PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ABSTAIN: Slates
REPORT ON THE PROPOSED DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Monica Florian addressed the Commission and stated that the
Commission had before it (1) Draft of Planning Commission Report
on the Redevelopment Plan, (2) Draft of proposed Section 11.0 for
possible inclusion in the Redevelopment Plan, and (3) Resolution
No. 1178 finding the Redevelopment Plan in conformance with the
General Plan and recommending for adoption.
The Commission suggested some revisions to the transmittal.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY PARKINSON TO APPROVE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT AS CORRECTED AND APPROVE THE SECTION 11.0
AS PRESENTED, AND AUTHORIZE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT THOSE
ITEMS TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY GIBSON. RESOLUTION 1178 FINDING
THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN PROJECT AREA IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND RECOMMENDING
THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ADOPTION BY THE REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WAS APPROVED
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
There was a discussion on permitting a single family home in con-
junction with a temporary horse stable in the RA District.
ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO
INITIATE A CODE AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY THE ALLOWANCE OF A PERMANENT
SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN CONJUNCTION WITH A TEMPORARY STABLE AND REQUEST
AN OPINION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY;S OFFICE ON BOTH QUESTIONS BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
4A AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
-27- 9/8/76 - PC
Minutes:') H.B. Planning Commission
Wednesday, September 8, 1976
Page 28
STAFF'S COMMENTS
Acting Secretary Selich discussed the action of City Council at its
September 7, 1976 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED
AT 11:10 P.M. BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
Aa el ch
Acting Secretary
chairman