Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-09-08 (7)APPROVED MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLA14NING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 - 7:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Boyle, Newman COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: CONSENT CALENDAR: Commissioner Shea was excused from the meeting. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY NEWMAN THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 17 AND AUGUST 24, 1976 WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED BY THE.FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea SCHEDULED ITEMS: GENERAL PLAN DOCUMENT/LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO, 76-2 Chairman Slate:. stated that the staff had recommended approval of Negative Declaration 76-78, adoption of General Plan Amendment 76-2, miscellaneous changes to the Land use Element, and a continuance of the General Plan document to the November 16, 1976 meeting. Viewqraphs were presented of the following areas of concern by Tom Moseley: 2.1 SOUTH OF MAIN STREET AND EAST OF FLORIDA STREET This is a request by William P. Helm to change the land use desig- nation from office professional to high density residential. The staff recommended no change. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this area, and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE COMMISSION SUSTAINED THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO LEAVE THE PROPERTY GENERAL PLANNED OFFICE PROFESSIONAL BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: bone ABSENT: Shea Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 2 2.2 NORTH OF WARNER AVENUE WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD This is a request by Foxx Development Corporation to change the land use designation from office professional and retail commercial to high density residential. The staff recommended that it be re- designated high density residential. Chairman Slates stated that he would abstain on this area since there might be a conflict of interest. He then turned the chair over to Vice Chairman Gibson. Vice Chairman Gibson opened the public hearing. There was no one present to speak on this area. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY PARKINSO_N AND SECONDBY BOYLE THECOMMISSION RE- DESIGNATED AREA 2.2 y FROM OFFICE_ PROFESSIONAL_ AND RETAIL -COMMERCIAL-- TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY-THEFOLLOWING-VOTE- - -- AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSTAIN: Slates ABSENT: Shea 2.3 NORTH OF CLAY AVENUE AND EAST OF GOLDENWEST STREET 3 This is a request to change the land use designation from planning reserve to light industrial and medium density residential. This was initiated by the staff of the Planning Department. Y The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this area and the public hearing was closed. A_.MOTION WAS MADE BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY SLATES TO REDESIGNATE AREA_2.3FROM PLANNING RESERVE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. Commissioner Gibson inquired as to the background of the planning reserve designation for this area. Acting Secretary Selich stated that a previous Amendment had reflected a recommendation for medium density residential for this area, but the City Council had re- quested that it be given furtrier study. As a result of this request, the Land Use Study was made. Commissioner Finley stated that since many of the requests for re - designation were based on the Industrial Land Use Study, a document which had not yet been reviewed by the City Council, t>',,e would not be in favor of changing the designation until the Council's reaction to the Study has been determined. -2- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 3 Commissioner Parkinson concurred with Commissioner Finley, He stated that the Industrial Land Use Inventory showed this area as being one of 'the lowest priorities for industrial development. He felt that it should be kept in planning reserve until it could be further evaluated. VOTE: AYES: Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson ABSENT: Shea THE MOTION FAILED. There was a discussion between staff and Commission as to what method would be used to transmit the information to the City Council. Chairman Slates stated that he felt it was unfair to the property owners in that area to hold up development of their property with the planning reserve designation. Commissioner Finley stated that she would be willing to change her vote to allow it to be transmitted to City Council. ON MOTION BY FINLEY AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE COMMISSION RECONSIDERE THE PREVIOUS MOTION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY SLATES THE COMMISSION REDESIGNATED AREA 2.3 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES:. Finley, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: Parkinson, Gibson ABSENT: Shea Commissioner Finley requested that the record show that her only reason for an affirmative vote was to allow staff to transmit to City Council. 2.4 NORTH OF CLAY AVENUE AND EAST OF GOLDENWEST STREET This is a request initiated by W. Sterling Buck and Associates to change the land use designation from industrial to high density residential. The staff iucommended no change in land use designation. Chairman Slates noted that a lengthy petition h^d been submitted to the Commission requesting that this land be designated for low density. -3- Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 4 W. S. Buck addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the changing of the designation to low density residential. He felt that leaving the designation as it is constitutes spot zoning in a residential area. He noted that the petition had been amended and changed to request low density residential rather than previously requested high density residential. Leroy Collins, developer of a shopping center on the corner of Beach and Talbert, spoke in favor of low density designation. Barbara Horowitz stated that she was the one who had circulated the petition. She suggested that Chairman Slates poll the audience. Chairman Slates requested that those in favor of low density so indicate by raising their hands. He noted for the record that a sizeable number of persons in the audience were in favor of the low density designation. The public hearing was closed. Acting Secretary Selich stated that existing Council policy for the area is reflected in the Taylor/Beach Specific Plan which designated the area industrial. ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE COMMISSION RE- DESIGNATED AREA 2.4 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AS CHANGED IN THE REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea Acting Secretary Selich stated that if this area becomes low density, the City should go north and take in all the smal_1_ lot areas west of the commercially designated properties on Beach Boulevard. By minute action the Commission recommended that the industrial small lot area, as designated by Acting Secretary Selich, be put into the next amendment. The Chairman called a two minute recess at 8:00 p.m. ` 2.5 NORTH OF TALBERT AVENUE AND WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD This is a request by Buccella Engineering for a change in land use designation from light industrial to medium density resi- dential. The staff recommended that no change be made in designation and that it remain light industrial. 1 -4- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 5 The public hearing was opened. Frank Buccella addressed the Commission and reviewed the reasons why he felt the property should be designated R2. He stated that at one time Beach Boulevard and the proposed freeway made it a good industrial area but that those have been deleted. He further stated that the railroad which is about a block or so away from the property might have been an important consideration at one time but no longer is used as much as it formerly was. He noted that other uses in the Gothard Industrial Corridor seem to be marginal with wrecking yards and other uses that are not really attractive for the City. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. Commissioner Finley stated that she felt Mr. Buccella had some good arguments in favor of his request but that she still felt the Industrial Land Use Study will have to be looked at more closely and reaction from the City Council obtained. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY AREA 2.5 WILL REMAIN DESIGNATED AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO OBTAIN FURTHER INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE REDESIGNATION WOULD AFFECT THE ADJACENT AREAq, TO BE_HEARD ON NOVEMBER 16._ 1976.IN CONNECTION WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AMENaNaU 76-3 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea 2.6 NORTH OF SLATER AVENUE AND WEST OF GOTHARD STREET This is a request by Robert L. Stellrecht for a change of light industrial to low density residential designation. The staff recommended a portion be redesignated low density residential. The public hearing was opened. Bob Stellrecht stated that he would be glad to answer any questions. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON A PORTION OF AREA 2.6 WAS REDESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, NOES: None ABSENT: Shea Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle -5- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 6 2.7 SOUTH OF HEIL AVENUE AND GOTHARD STREET This is a request by CELS Corporation to redesignate the area from light industrial to low density residential. The staff recommended no change. The public hearing was opend. Tallas Margrave, President of CELS Corporation, spoke in favor of the redesignation. He stated that in Huntington Beach and Orange County there is a tremendous demand for Rl_property which is selling at a higher price than either R2 or R3. He further noted that neither the developer, the owner, the prospective owner, nor property owners in the area wanted this property to remain in the M1 designation. He stated that a petition signed by ad- jacent property owners objecting to the M1 designation was on file. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY NEWMAN TO APPROVE CHANGE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO R1 ON THE BASIS THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE RESIDENTIAL'AND IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO BUFFER ADEQUATELY THE INDUSTRIAL USE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL. Acting Secretary Selich stated that the City Council is going to have to look very carefully at the Industrial Land Use Study the Planning Department has made and come up with some reasonable policy on evaluating these General Plan requests. Commissioner Finley stated that she felt there are some natural buffers insofar as this site is concerned such as the flood control channel and railroad track on the other side of Gothard. She stated that she would not want to remove this area from industrial zoning, but would like to have the City Council look at the study. There was a discussion on when the Industrial Land Use Study would be transmitted. Although the staff had originally planned to transmit the document to the City Council along with the General Plan, it was the consensus of the Commission that this document should be transmitted as soon as possible. VOTE: AYES: Boyle, Slates NOES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman ABSENT: Shea THE MOTION FAILED. ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY AREA 2.7 REMAINED DESIGNATED AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUT WILL BE REVIEWED 'S PART OF THE THIRD AMENDMENT ON NOVEMBER 16, 1976 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 197E Page 7 2.8 SOUTH OF EDINGER AVENUE AND WEST OF GOTHARD STREET This is a request by Ashwill-Burke & Co. for a redesignation from light industrial to commercial retail. The staff recommended a portion be redesignated commercial retail. The public hearing was opened. A representative of the applicant addressed the Commission and stated that he was in agreement with the staff's recommendation. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY FINLEY A PORTION OF AREA 2.8 WAS REDESIGNATED COMMERCIAL RETAIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None 2.9 NORTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to redesignate Area 2.9 from medium density residential to commercial retail. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this area. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY FINLEY AREA 2.9 WAS REDESIGNATED AS COMMERCIAL RETAIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea 2.10 NORTH OF ADAMS AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to redesignate Area 2.10 from commercial retail to open space. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION -BY SKATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.10 WAS REDESIG - NATED OPEN SPACE BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman,,;Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea -7- 9/8/76 - PC 4ingtes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 8 2.11 NORTH OF UTICA AVENUE AND WEST OF LAKE STREET This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to redesignate this area from Government Center to medium density residential The public hearing was opened and there was no one present to speak on this area. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.11 WAS REDESIG- NATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley,'Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea 2.12 EAST OF BROOKHURST STREET AND NORTH OF HAMILTON AVENUE This is a request by Arthofer and Howard Development Co. for a redesignation from commercial retail to medium density residential. The Planning staff has recommended that it be redesignated low density residential. Acting Secretary Selich stated that the staff had been influenced in its decision on redesignation to low density by the fact that a number of high density uses already are adjacent to the area and the Greenbelt Commission recommended low density. The public hearing was opened. Jerry Bame addressed the Commission and stated that the property owners have spared no effort in past years in trying to sell the property with the commercial zoning, but that it is just not a viable commercial piece of property. He further stated that the owners felt R2 would be conducive to development of this area and were requesting medium density residential. Mr. Leonard Muskin spoke in favor of redesignation to medium density. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Slates stated he would have no argument with medium density residential but if it ever comes up for a zone change he would want it,to be with a PD suffix. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.12 WAS RE- DESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea -8- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 9 2.13.1 EAST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET AND SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE This is a request by Crosman Advertising Company for a re - designation from low density residential to medium density residential. The staff recommended that it be redesignated medium density residential.' The public hearing was opened. Barbara Baker spoke in favor of the area remaining low density. Sandra Bunsch, a resident of the area, spoke in favor of low density for the area. Frank Buccella spoke in favor of redesignation to medium density residential. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Slates stated that he felt the area merited a more detailed study of the residential uses in the area. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE AREA 2.13.1 WAS CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 16, 1976 MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea 2.13.2 WEST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET AND SOUTH OF WARNER This is a request by Richard Annigoni for redesignation from low density residential to medium density residential. The staff recommended it be redesignated medium density residential. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this area and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Gibson stated that he would not be in favor of this redesignation since the flight pattern from Meadowlark Airport is over the area. He also cited the deficiency in park and open space areas as a reason for his not being in favor of the re- designatign. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON 2.13.2 WAS REDESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: Gibson ABSENT: Shea -9- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 10 2.14 EAST OF "B" STREET AND SOUTH OF WARNER AVENUE This is a request by Henry H. Uyekawa for-redesignation from com- mercial retail to medium density residential. The staff recommended redesignation of medium density residential. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this area and the public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE AREA 2.14 WAS REDESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea 2.15 SOUTH OF ALDRICH AVENUE AND WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD This is a request by Tarbell Realtors to redesignate commercial retail to high density residential. Staff recommended it be re- designated high density residential. The public hearing was opened. George Hanna spoke 4gainst the redesignation to high density, stating that he bought the property as a commercial piece of property and wanted it to remain as such. Juan Estrada stated that he had owned lots for ten years in the area and it cannot be developed as commercial. He requested high density residential designation. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY NEWMAN AREA 2.15 WAS REDESIGNATED TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman NOES: Boyle ABSENT: Shea 2.16 SOUTH OF SAN DIEGO FREEWAY AND EAST OF SAN ANGELO DRIVE This is a request by the Huntington Beach Planning Department to redesignate the area from planning reserve to high density resi- dential. Chairman Slates stated that this property is presently in litigation. For this reason he felt it should be continued. The public hearing was opened. There was no one preset_: to speak on this area and the public hearing was closed. -10- 9/8/76 - PC 1 Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesdayf September 8,.1976 Page 11 ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON AREA 2.16 WAS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 16, 1976 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE THE GENERAL PLAN DOCUMENT WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1976 TO PERMIT FURTHER REFINEMENT OF SECTIONS 4.0 AND 5.0 BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE. 2MS : Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE NEGATIVE DECLARATION 76-78 WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 76-2 WAS APPROVED AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea, Finley ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE THE STAFF WAS REQUESTED TO ALTER ENVIRONEMENTAL ASSESSMENT TO REFLECT PLANNING COMMISSION MODIFICATION OF THE AMENDMENT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: _Parkinson, Gibson, Slates, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Finley,'Newman, Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON RESOLUTIONV 1175, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN 76-2, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea, Newman -11- 9/8/77 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 12 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-18 Applicant: Walt Babcock This is a request for development of a racquetball club on the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Sims Street. The Planning Commission at its meeting of July 27, 1976 discussed the above referenced application. The staff recommended a con- tinuance on the matter so as -to allow a readvertising of the legal notice, and to allow completion of research as to the legal status of the subject parcels. This has been completed and the parcels determined to be accurately plotted on the site plan. The public hearing was opened. R. Geroci, whose parents own property across the street from the proposed racquetball club, addressed the Commission and stated that he did not know this type of development would be allowed in R3 zone. He was advised by the Commission that it was a legal use for the property. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-18 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS' BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed plan substantially complies with the applicable ordinance code requirements. 2. The proposed design and layout of the facilities will provide for a compatible land use with the adjacent residential properties. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The site plan dated June 10, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, building elevations indicating colors and materials shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a landscape plan shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Developmen for review and approval. -12- 9/8/76 - PC ,; Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8,'1976 Page 13 4. The hours of operation shall be limited from 7:O0 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 5. The developer shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 6. Warner Avenue and Sims Street shall be dedicated and improved as required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 7. A parcel map showing elimination of all interior property lines shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office prior to occupancy of the use. $. A six (6) foot high wall shall be installed on the southerly and easterly property lines. The design and materials of said wall shall be subject to approval by the Planning Department. 9. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation Annexation District No. 11 requirements and fees. AYES: Parki.ns4n, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-17 Applicant: T. J. Hennes, Gold Bar Stables In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-08 Applicant: Ted Hennes, Gold Bar Stables Conditional Use Permit No. 76-17 is a request to permit the continuance of an existing commercial horse stable in an area located on the southwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue. Conditional Exception No. 76-08 is a request to permit encroach- ments into the required front, exterior side, interior side, and rear yard setbacks. A vugraph was shown. John Cope addressed the Commission and stated that several modifications had to be made to the existing facilities. The public hearing was opened. Ted Hennes, applicant, addressed the Commission, and discussed the hay stack removal. There was a discussion on meeting parking requirements. -13- 9/8/76 PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 14 The public hearing was closed. It was the consensus of the Commission that further work should be completed on the plans prior to consideration. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-17 AND,CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-08 WERE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 21, 1976 BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea Commissioner Gibson stated that he would like to see what has been done on the other horse stables and requested that the staff provide a report on this. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9468 Subdivider: Wonacott, Shah & Panchal In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-23 Applicant: Wonacott, Shah & Panchal, Inc. Tentative Tract 9468 in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 76-23, filed on July 21, 1976, is a request to allow a 40-unit Planned Residential Development on a 3.69+ acre parcel of land. Subject property is located at the southeast corner of Heil Avenue and Algonquin Street. Architectural renderings were displayed. Chairman Slates opened the public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 76-23 and solicited testimony on Tentative Tract 9468. Mr. Panchal addressed the Commission and expressed appreciation for the cooperation obtained from the Staff. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SLATES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-23 WAS APPROVED WITH TH_E TOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -14- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received and dated September 1, 1976 shall be the approved layout of the 40 unit condominium development. 2. All utilities shall be installed underground. 3. All details and amenities of the development as shown on the site plans submitted for approval shall be constructed within this development, such as the recreational building, swimming pool, a jacuzzi, etc., as well as those areas within the pedestrian and vehicular circulation to be constructed with stamped concrete to aesthetically improve the project. 4. The exterior elevations of all buildings proposed for construction within the project shall comply with the architectural design of the unit submitted in conjunction with the site plan and tentative map. 5. If the developer chooses to build with a modified sidewalk section pursuant to the most recent standards on file with the Department of Public Works, a landscaping maintenance agreement shall be entered into -and approved by the City prior to the recordation of a final map. 6. The CC & R's and association rules shall set forth provisions for the exclusive use of those open parking spaces immediately ad- jacent to the units intended to serve and as delineated upon the site plan received and dated September 1, 1976 and shall provide for common use of all other open parking spaces. 7. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in the ceiling and exterior wall shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum.of R-13 and R-7, respectively. 8. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus and unusable material shall be disposed of at an off site facility equipped to handle them. 9. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the lo- cation of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the location of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 10. The structures on subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards as set forth for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL contour of subject property. -15- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 16 11. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the surface acce,lleration for earth movement for subject property. 12. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated-g factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to issuance of building permits. 13. All structures proposed for construction within this subdivision shall be constructed in compliance with the g factor calculations and chemical and physical soils analysis. 14. Community antenna facilities shall be installed by developer in compliance with specifications as set forth in Resolution No. 4281 adopted by the City Council July 19, 1976. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON TENTATIVE TRACT 9468 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find that the proposed subdivision, along with its design and improve- ments, is consistent with general and specific plans for the area in that: 1. The proposed subdivision of this 3.69+ acre parcel of land zoned R-2 (which allows 15 units per gross acre) is proposed to be constructed having only 10.8 units -per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has.set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density residential was placed on said property. 4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all other design and improvements features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City, as well as in compliance with the State Map and supplementary City Sub- division Ordinance. -16- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 17 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Tentative Tract Map received and dated September 1, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant system shall be subject to City standards. 3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The property shall be subject to local drainage assessment requirements and fees. 6. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public or prior to the recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide for siltation erosion control both during and after construction of the project. 7. All required improvements shall be constructed under the super- vision of and to the approval of the City Engineer. Costs for the inspection shall be paid by the subdivider. 3'-1/3 percent of the amount of the improvement bond shall be posted with the City Engineer for construction costs. 8. A 45 inch RCP storm line and catch basin shall be constructed at the intersection of Heil Avenue and Algonquin Street. 9. Vehicular access rights to Heil Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at street intersections. Vehicular access rights to Algonquin Street shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at the two driveways as shown upon the plan received and dated September 1, 1976. 10. The off -site improvement of Sells Circle, Heil Avenue, and Algonquin Street shall be dedicated and improved to City stand- ards and specifications on file with the Department of Public Works. -11. Developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation Annexation District 11 requirements and fees. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea -17- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 18 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9481 Applicant: L. D..Zehnder Engineer: Emerald Engineering Tentative Map No. 9481 filed on August 3, 1976 is a request to subdivide approximately a 1.9 acre of land into a 6 lot medium density subdivision. Subject property is located at the southeast corner of Delaware Street and Yorktown Avenue. There was a discussion on the conditions of approval. A vugraph was shown. The applicant, L. D. Zehnder, presented plans for viewing by Commission. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND,BY GIBSON NEGATIVE DECLARATION 76-70 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9481 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find that the proposed subdivision, along with its design and improve- ments, is consistent with general and specific plans for the area in that: 1. The proposed subdivision of this 1.9+ acre parcel of land zoned R-2 (which allows 15 units per gross acre) is proposed to be constructed having only 12.1 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density residential was placed on said property. -18- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 19 4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all other design and improvements features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City, as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The tentative map received and dated August 27, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. The sewer, water, and fire hydrant system shall be designed to City standards. 3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 5. The property shall be subject to local drainage assessment district requirements and fees. 6. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide for siltation and erosion control both during and after construction of the project. 7. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation District #3 sewer annex district. 8. 'Vehicular access rights along Delaware Street and Yorktown Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 9. All utilities shall be installed underground. 10. A decorative masonry wall shall be constructed to City specifications along Lot 1, which sides onto Delaware Street. Said wall shall be six inches wide and six feet high. The height of said wall shall be measured from whichever side is higher at finished grade. The architectural design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Department. The structural design shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and shall be included as part of the street improvement plans. 11. A landscape planter shall be provided at the intersections of Delaware Street and Yorktown Avenue and at the end of section of England Street and Yorktown Avenue. Such planter shall conform to the plans and specifications on file in the Department of Public Works and to the requirement of the Plann:L..g Commission. It is the developer's responsibility to landscape such planters and provide irrigation facilities in conformance with the Depart- ment of Public Works specifications and requirements. -19- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 20 12. A fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed by the developer atzlocations and specifications provided by the Fire' Department. 13. The exterior elevations on buildings to be constructed on Lots 1 and 4 shall be subject to approval by the Planning Department. The intent of this requirement is to improve the street scene by having the developer provide architectural features and variations of building materials on exterior faces of buildings that are viewed from an arterial highway. 14. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings.and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respectively. 15. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus and unusable material shall be deposited in an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 16. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at locations of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at locations of surface units, cooking facilities, water heaters and central heating units. 17. The,structuras on subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL contour of the property. 18, Community antenna facilities shall be installed by developer in compliance with specifications as set forth in Resolution 4281, adopted by.the City Council July 9, 1976. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-31 Applicant: Rodney B. Lauter In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-07 Applicant: Rodney B. Lauter Tentative Parcel -Map -No. 76-31 in conjunction with Conditional Exception 76-07, filed on July 30, 1976, is a request t., allow a 110 ft. parcel to be subdivided into two parcels having 55 ft. frontage in lieu of the 60 ft. as required by the Ordinance Code. -20- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 21 Subject property is located on the west side of Delaware Street, approximately 170 ft. north of Yorktown Ave. Jim Palin stated that he had nothing to add to the suggested conditions of approval contained in the staff report. The public hearing was opened on both applications. Rodney Lauter addressed the Commission and stated that he was prepared to answer any questions. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-07 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The size, shape, and location of the property is such that the existing surrounding uses to the north, west, and south make the property impossible to develop in 'any other configuration than what has been requested by this conditional exception as it is currently impossible to provide street access along the south or west property lines of subject property. 2. This request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of the community as the development proposed upon this 155 ft. parcel is proposed at a less intensity than all surrounding uses and there are more than 15 parcels within 600 ft. having less frontage than what is being proposed by this request. - AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-31 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS:- 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find that the proposed subdivision along with its design improvements is consistent with General and Specific Plans in the area in that: a. The proposed subdivision of this 1.39+ acre parcel of land zoned R-2, which allows 15 units per gross acre, is proposed to be constructed having only 8.5 units per gross acre. -21- 9/8/76 - PC -- Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 22 b. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing. C. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for medium density residential was placed on subject property. d. The lot size, depths, street widths and all other design im- provement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and speci- fications on file with the City as well as in compliance with State Map Act and supplementary City subdivision ordinances. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received and dated July 30, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. A.parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the County Recorder. 3. Delaware Street shall be dedicated to City standards at the time the parcels arc developed. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcels are developed. 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcels are developed. 6. Ail utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcels are developed. 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 8. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time said parcels are developed. 9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Planning Department. 10. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach on Delaware except at the location of the private drive to serve both parcels as shown upon the parcel map received and dated July 30, 1976. 11. Reciprocal drive easements shall be provided across the southerly portion of the northerly lot and across the northerly portion of the southerly lot to provide vehicular ingress and egress for both parcels over the common drive. -22- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 81 1976 Page 23 r ,1.976 AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 76-36 Applicant: Robert J. Eadie In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-09 Applicant: Robert J. Eadie Tentative Parcel Map No. 76-36 is a request to permit a two lot division of land located on the southwest corner of Huntington Avenue at Springfield Avenue. Conditional Exception No. 76-09 is a request for reduction of 2.5' on corner lot which requires 65' total width in lieu of Section 9162.2 John Cope stated that he had no information to add to that con- tained in the staff report. The public -hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on these applications and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 76-79 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY NEWMAN CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-09 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-09 - FINDINGS: 1. The reduction in lot width of 2.5 feet and in the lot area of 20 square feet is not significant and will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. This conclusion is based on the fact that the usual lot width for similar developments is 54 feet. 2. The exception will allow the property owner the use of a portion of his property for the same purpose as the other properties which are not encumbered by resource production. 'AYES: Parkinson, Finley_, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle -NOES: None ABSENT: Shea -23- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 24 ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY NEWMAN TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-36 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-36 - FINDINGS: 1. The proposed division of land is consistent with the adopted General Plan Land Use Element objectives and the existing z.Dning adopted by the City. 2. The subject site and existing structures are suitable for the site of the proposed division of land. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-36 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCELS FOR ANY PURPOSE. 1. The -tentative parcel map received by the Planning Department on August 24, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by, the Department of.Public Works, and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Huntington -Street and Springfield Avenue shall be dedicated to City standards at the time'said parcels are developed. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcels are developed. 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system -at the time said parcels are developed. 6. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time said parcels are developed. 7. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Planning Department. 8. Huntington Street and Springfield Avenue shall be fully improved as required by the Department of Public Works prior to the occupancy or use of Parcel No. 1 for any purpose. 9. A six (6) foot high solid fence shall be provided on the property line separating the two parcels prior to the occupancy or use of Parcel No. 1 for any purpose. AYES: Parkinson, Finldy, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea -24- 9/8/76 - PC I Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 25 PRECISE'PLAN.'OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-5 This is a request to precisely plan a sixty (60) ft. local street commencing from Nashville Avenue and continuing northerly to Oswego Avenue and to precise plan two alleys commencing from Nashville Avenue and continuing northerly to Oswego Avenue. One such alley will be located approximately 125 ft. east of Huntington St. and the other will be located approximately 125 ft. west of Delaware Street. The proposed precise plan will provide for a local north/south street to be.between Nashville Ave. and Oswego Ave. The street will be a 56 ft. rightway located approximately 294 ft. east of the centerline of Huntington Street. In addition, the proposal will precise plan two north/south alleys, 20 ft. in width, and also located between Nashville and Oswego Streets approximately 153 ft. east of the center- line of Huntington Street and approximately 166 ft. west of the center- line of Delaware Street. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this Precise Plan of Street Alignment, and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-5 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY'BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON RESOLUTION NO. 1177; A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-5 TO PROVIDE FOR A NORTH/SOUTH 56 FOOT LOCAL STREET AND TWO TWENTY FOOT ALLEYS LOCATED BETWEEN NASHVILLE AVENUE AND OSWEGO AVENUE,BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman,'Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-7 - DOLORES STREET CUL-DE-SAC Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 76-7 is a proposal to cul-de-sac the north end -of Dolores Street approximately 610 feet north of Pearce Street. Dolores Street is a local street located just east of Algonquin Street between Heil and Warner Avenues. , -25- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes:- H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 26 It is intended that this proposed street alignment will provide a more, efficient and safe circulation system within the immediate area. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak on this Precise Plan of Street Alignment. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-7 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: to AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON RESOLUTION NO. 1176, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 76-7 TO PROVIDE CUL-DE-SAC ON DOLORES STREET 610 FEET NORTH OF PEARCE STREET, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea MISCELLANEOi7S LETTER FROM COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY DATED AUGUST 24, 1976 CONCERNING ARTERIAL BIKEWAY ROUTE 17B John Cope stated that the intent of this letter is to request the Commission to determine the proposed project's conformity with the General Plan. ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY RESOLUTION NO. 1179 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINDING THE PROPOSED PACIFIC COAST OFFROAD BIKEWAY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON SHIPLEY STREET John Cope discussed a proposed residential development on Shipley Street that will incorporate the previously discussed cul-de-sacing of Shipley and thereby necessitate some additional dedications and vacations of rights -of -way. Chairman Slates stated that he would have to abstain on this item and turned the meeting over to Vice Chairman Gibson. -26- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 27 ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE COMMISSION CONCURRED THAT SAID VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ABSTAIN: Slates REPORT ON THE PROPOSED DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Monica Florian addressed the Commission and stated that the Commission had before it (1) Draft of Planning Commission Report on the Redevelopment Plan, (2) Draft of proposed Section 11.0 for possible inclusion in the Redevelopment Plan, and (3) Resolution No. 1178 finding the Redevelopment Plan in conformance with the General Plan and recommending for adoption. The Commission suggested some revisions to the transmittal. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOYLE AND SECONDED BY PARKINSON TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT AS CORRECTED AND APPROVE THE SECTION 11.0 AS PRESENTED, AND AUTHORIZE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT THOSE ITEMS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY GIBSON. RESOLUTION 1178 FINDING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN PROJECT AREA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ADOPTION BY THE REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea There was a discussion on permitting a single family home in con- junction with a temporary horse stable in the RA District. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO INITIATE A CODE AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY THE ALLOWANCE OF A PERMANENT SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN CONJUNCTION WITH A TEMPORARY STABLE AND REQUEST AN OPINION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY;S OFFICE ON BOTH QUESTIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 4A AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea -27- 9/8/76 - PC Minutes:') H.B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 8, 1976 Page 28 STAFF'S COMMENTS Acting Secretary Selich discussed the action of City Council at its September 7, 1976 meeting. ADJOURNMENT: ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY PARKINSON THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 11:10 P.M. BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Shea Aa el ch Acting Secretary chairman