Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-01-11APPROVED 2/15/77 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, JANUAAY 11, 1977 - 7 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Parkinson was excused due to illness. NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. SCHEDULED ITEMS: MULTI -STORY POLICY PLAN, PACIFICASPECIFIC PLAN, AND CITYWIDE MULTI -STORY ORDINANCE Al Montes gave a presentation on this item. Commission discussion ensued with staff members in regard to the proposed regulations. Staff clarified questions directed toward the wording of certain portions of the proposed ordinance. The Commission advised the staff to amend the proposed Policy Plan pursuant to the discussion which took place and further directed that this item be considered concurrently with the Pacifica Specific Plan and the Multi -Story Ordinance at a public hearing at which time the Policy Plan should be adopted by Resolution. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY GIBSON STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO SET THE PROPOSED MULTI -STORY ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC HEARING BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Parkinson Chairman Slates turned the chair over to Vice -Chairman Gibson and declared he would abstain on the issue of the proposed specific plan due to his involvement of selling property within the specific plan area. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SHEA STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO SET PACIFICA SPECIFIC PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Finley, Gibson, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSTAIN: Slates ABSENT: Parkinson - Vice -Chairman Gibson turned the meeting over to Chairman Slates. Minutes: 11.13. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 11, 1977 Page 2 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION CERTIFICATE ORDINANCE STUDY Al Montes presented the study. Commission discussion ensued. As a result of considerable discussion it was the consensus of the com- mission to transmit a communication to the City Council requesting their consideration of the matter insofar as committing additional staff time to this matter. Commissioner Gibson stated that he felt if the communication was transmitted to the City Council it should contain a recommendation that the Planning Commission thinks it is worthy of further study. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY GIBSON STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO PREPARE A COMMUNICATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION EX- PRESSING A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION ON THE MATTER BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Finley, Gibson, Newman, Boyle NOES: Slates, Shea ABSENT: Parkinson The Commission requested that the transmittal contain a further breakdown of indirect costs which can be anticipated by the adoption of such an ordinance, including reference to possible increases upon the Board of Zoning Adjustments' calendar as an indirect impact associated with the ordinance. ON MOTION BY GIBSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE THE STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO PREPARE A TRANSMITTAL FOR THE PERUSAL OF THE COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 1977 BY TILE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Parkinson GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCEDURES Dave Eadie gave the presentation. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE COMMISSION ENDORSED THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO REQUEST THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES AND NOTICE PROCEDURES ON THE NEW PETITIONS AND FURTHER APPROVED THE REVISED PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Parkinson, Shea, Newman REQUEST FOR REVISED CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 76-01 AND TENTATIVE TRACT 8719• Applicant: Huntington Bluff Properties, a Limited Partnership and. -- Louis Graziadio, General Partner -2- 1/11/77 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 11, 1977 Page 3 Jim Palin stated that the Staff was in receipt of a letter from Department of*Public Works which referenced a letter from the appli- cant requesting that the requirement (Condition No. 4 of Conditional Use Permit 76-01, approved March 16, 1976) for Bomenite and colored concrete for paving be waived to permit construction of asphalt con- crete paving. The Staff made no recommendation. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY GIBSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY CONDITION NO. 4 OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-01 WAS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 4. All details and amenities of the development as shown on the site plan submitted for approval shall be constructed within the development, such as recreational building, swimming pool, jacuzzi, etc., as well as those areas within the pedestrian and vehicular circulation areas to aesthetically improve the project. AYES: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman NOES: Boyle ABSENT: Parkinson REVIEW OF ANNUAL REPORT %owl Monica Florian reviewed with the Commission a proposed format for the 1976 Annual Report. The Commission concurred with the approach suggested. NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES Jim Palin addressed the Commission and briefly reviewed these pro- cedures. He noted that copies of guidelines to the Environmental Quality Act and the amendments thereto had been handed out to the Commission at its January 4, 1977 meeting. Commission discussion ensued on the 50 items contained in the document entitled "Summary of Amendments". PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY MANUAL John Cope addressed the Commission and discussed the summary of the documented past Planning Commission policies. The staff requested the Commission to consider any policies which may have been left off of this initial list. The staff indicated that these will be documented on a Planning Commission form and incorporated into a comprehensive Policy Manual which will be reviewed annually by the Commission. V -3- 1/11/77 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 11, 1977 Page 4 ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SHEA THE COMMISSION DIRECTED THE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH PREPARATION OF THE MANUAL WITH THE FIRST ' POLICY OF THIS YEAR TO BE ESTABLISHED AS 77-1 BY:THE-FOLLOWING­ VOTE: AYES: _ Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES:-,: None = . ABSENT: Parkinson Commission discussed Commission policies regarding public hearing on staff or City initiated studies. - CHANGES IN-THE"SUBDIVISION MAP ACT Jim Palin addressed the Commission concerning the changes in the Subdivision Map Act. He stated that he would like for the Plan- ning Commission to consider establishing -a fee similar to that required -on . "a _ Tentative Parcel Map .f or -.Certificate. of_ Occupancy . The Commission concurred. STATE SURPLUS FREEWAY PROPERTIES The Commission concurred with -all--of the staff recommendations. In addition, they -recommended to the City Council that the City investigate acquisition of State-owned property on the west side of Beach Boulevard--near-Pacific Coast Highway -since that area is critical to downtown revitalization;. -'The -Commission -directed -the staff to_prepare-a transmittal to City Council urging the City Council to seek through the State Legislature'a means whereby the City would be reimbursed for.lost-p-roperty taxes when the State sold its excess lands at a substantial -profit. . STATUS OF NEW COASTAL COMMISSION LEGISLATION This information was received and filed. COMMISSIONERS'COMMENTS: Commissioner Finley stated that there would be an open house held on January 22 in -Mission -Viejo at-whidh-there would be displayed prototypes for solar energy. Commissioner Boyle discussed-with-Mike„Zambory, Public Works, the widening of Hamilton and -Edwards. This will be`accomplished during the summer. STAFF'S COMMENTS: Acting Secretary Selich stated that the January 25th study session will concern Oldtown Precise Plan of Streets. He further stated that there will be a joint study session with the City Council on February 7 to discuss industrial land use., -4- 1/11/77 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 11, 1977 Page 5 ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Eft&fd D. Selich Acting Secretary Roger Slates Chairman - 5- 1/11/7 7. - PC APPROVED 2/15/77 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, JANUARY 18, 1977 - 7 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None NOTE: A TAPE RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE. CONSENT CALENDAR: ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 21, 1976 AND JANUARY 4, 1977 WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, NOES: None ABSENT: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None SCHEDULED ITEMS: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle Chairman Slates and Commissioner Shea stated that they would have to abstain on the first item on the agenda, Zone Case No. 76-26"B". Commissioner Shea stated that she would be addressing the Commission during the public hearing as a citizen and not as a Commissioner. The meeting was then chaired by Vice -Chairman Gibson. ZONE CASE NO. 76-26"B" Applicant: Initiated by the Planning Department This is a request for a change of zone from RA-0-CD, RA-0, Ml, R3 and Cl to R2, R2-0, and R2-0-CD. -Zone Case No. 76-26"B" was initiated by the Planning Department in order to implement the recently approved change in the land use designation for the area. The Land Use Element designates all the properties south of Garfield Avenue, north of Clay Avenue between Goldenwest Street, and the railroad right-of-way as medium density residential. John Cope addressed the Commission and gave a brief summary of the background of the request for a change of zone. A vugraph was shown. Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 2 Vice -Chairman Gibson opened the public hearing. Prim Shea addressed the Commission, stating that she was speaking as a private citizen against that portion of the proposed zone change which dealt with the M1 zone. She stated that while those businesses in the Ml could remain as a non -conforming use (if the Zone Change was approved) there would be no incentive for upgrading their property and they could not expand their use. Mr. Lee Miller, owner of an M1 parcel and in the oil business, spoke against the proposed change, citing the expense that would be in- curred in moving to another location. Tom Whaling spoke against changing the Ml zoning, stating that M1 provided a better tax base for the City than residential. Bruce Greer, property owner in the area, addressed the Commission and stated that he felt the total area should be Ml. Ken King, realtor, spoke against changing the M1 zoning. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued concerning the possibility of a con- tinuance to allow time for further study. It was noted that there will be a joint meeting between the City Council and Planning Com- mission on February 22, and at that time the Planning Department's Industrial Land Use Study would be completed. Vice -Chairman Gibson directed the Staff to do a case study paper for that meeting as a part of this industrial study. Acting Secretary Palin stated that letters will be sent to property owners in the area and a case study will be prepared. ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY FINLEY ZONE CASE 76-26"B" WAS CONTINUED TO MARCH 15, 1977 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSTAIN: Slates, Shea ABSENT: None Vice -Chairman Gibson then turned the meeting over to Chairman Slates. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-31 Applicant: Dennis Vinciguerra Conditional Use Permit No. 76-31 is a request to develop a commercial skateboard park consisting of various types of skateboarding runs and areas, off-street parking, landscaping, and office and snack bar facilities. 1 -2- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 3 The location for the proposed facilities is on the east side of Beach Boulevard 1000+ feet north of Hamilton Avenue. A vugraph was shown. John Cope addressed the Commission and reviewed the staff report noting that numerous petitions both for and against the project had been received. It was the recommendation of the staff that this project be conditionally approved. He presented slides of a similar project located in Anaheim. The public hearing was opened. Tom Whaling, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and presented over 200 signatures of people who were in favor of the project. A scaled model was displayed for Commission viewing. Betty Potter, President of Surfside Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the project, citing noise as one of her reasons. Another resident of Surfside spoke in opposition to the project. Walt Larson, owner of a Surfside condominium, spoke in opposition to it. Suzi Smith, a member of the Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the project. Mrs. Vinciguerra, wife of the applicant, addressed the Commission stating that she felt the beach area was a recreational one and that a skateboard park in the area would be appropriate. Jane Brown addressed the Commission and stated that she had en- countered over 2,000 people who were in favor of this project and she felt that there was a need for this type of recreation. Doug Levantevort spoke in opposition to the project. Dale Smith, a professional skateboard rider from Long Beach, spoke in favor of the facility. Pauline Morris spoke in opposition to the project stating that it would cut off her view. Virginia Marshall, of Surfside, spoke in opposition to the project, and stated that more trash would result if such an operation was approved. -3- 1/18/77- PC Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 4 Mike Hamburger was in favor of a skateboard park and stated that it would take the children off the street. Kit Doberman spoke in favor of such a recreational facility but did not think the proposed location was proper for it. Jack Miller spoke in opposition to the project, stating that the lighting and litter could have an impact on the area. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY SHEA AND SECOND BY NEWMAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-31 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS AND BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The proposed use would have a detrimental impact on the health, safety and welfare of the citizens residing and working in the area. 2. The proposed use at this location would not be to the best in- terest of the City because of possible impacts on the adjacent commercial uses - AYES: Gibson, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: Parkinson, Finley, Slates ABSENT: None Chairman Slates called a five minute recess. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9635 Subdivider: Shaffer Development This is a request for an 11 lot subdivision on the west side of Green, 221 ft.+ north of Pearce. Tentative Tract No. 9635 was originally scheduled for review by the Planning Commission at its January 4, 1977 meeting, however this matter was continued to the January 18, 1977 meeting to allow the staff time to meet with the engineer for the developer to work out problems on location of the east/west easement across subject property and to work out details on street width and location for "A" Street which is proposed within this subdivision. Acting Secretary Palin stated that Mr. Panchal, engineer for the developer,had met with the staff to review the layout and that the staff recommended conditional approval. Commission discussion ensued. -4- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 5 ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SHEA NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 76-19 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SHEA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9635 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find that the proposed subdivision, along with its design and improve- ments, is consistent with general and specific plans for the area in that: 1. The proposed subdivision of this 2.88 acre parcel of land zoned R-2 (which allows 15 units per gross acre) is proposed to be constructed having only 14.58 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for medium density residential was placed on said property. 4. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all other design and improvements features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifi- cations on file with the City, as well as in compliance with the State Map and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The map received and dated January 14, 1977 shall be the approved layout. 2. The sewer, water and fire hydrant system shall be designed to City standards. 3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system. 4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. -5- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 6 5. The property shall be subject to local drainage assessment district requirements and fees. 6. Green Street and "A" Street shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. The 16 ft. easement along the southerly portion of lots 6 through 10 shall be shown on the recorded map. „ 7. Green Street, "A" Street and the 20 ft. area along the south of lots 6 through 10 shall be improved to City standards. 8. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide for siltation and erosion control both during and after construction of the project. 9. All utilities shall be installed underground. 10. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation of ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11 respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of,R-13 and R-7 respectively. 11. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus and unusable material shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 12. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at locations of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at locations of surface units for cooking facilities, water heaters, and cen- tral heating units. 13. Fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed by the developer at locations to specifications provided by the Fire Department. 14. A pedestrian easement shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach for pedestrian access at the end of "A" Street. The landscaping design and wall materials to be constructed at this location shall be submitted to the Plan- ning Department for review and approval action prior to the - issuance of building permits. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None -6- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 7 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-62 - APPEAL Applicant: Valley Consultants, Inc., for Jack Santiago Appellant: Ron Winterburn for Valley Consultants, Inc. This is a request to permit a five foot encroachment into the required ten foot front yard setback for property located on the west side of Delaware Street, approximately 27 feet north of Elmira Avenue. John Cope presented aerial slides of the structure and reviewed the staff report. He indicated that this application had been denied by the Board of Zoning Adjustments at its December 1, 1976 meeting. Dennis Harwood, attorney representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that he felt that an honest mistake had been made by the applicant when the property was surveyed. Ron Winterburn addressed the Commission and stated that the survey was done in May of 1975, and further discussed the needs for a variance. It was noted that the applicant had actually brought the error in the survey to the attention of the City when he went to pour cement in the rear yard. Jim Van Derhyden, adjacent property owner, addressed the Commission and spoke in opposition to the granting of the variance, stating that it was in direct violation of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. He further stated that it would set an undesirable precedent if ap- proved. He felt that if approved the adjacent property owners should be granted the same right. He stated that it cut down on the view from his property. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY SHEA THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS WAS OVERRULED IN ITS DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-62 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-62 WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The encroachment resulted from an unintentional error in judg- ment. 2. Compliance with the required setback would incur unreasonable expense. 3. The granting of this Conditional Exception would not be detri- mental to the health and welfare of the neighborhood or adjacent structures. -7- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes - H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 8 CONDITION: 1. The drain spouts on the balconies shall be removed to a north/ south area, in order to avoid any detrimental effect that may be incurred on the public right-of-way areas. AYES: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman NOES: Parkinson, Boyle ABSENT: None TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-69 Applicant: John Thomas In Conjunction With CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-10 Applicant: John Thomas Tentative Parcel Map No. 76-69 in conjunction with Conditional Exception No. 76-10, filed on December 23, 1976, is a request to allow a 115 ft. parcel of land to be subdivided into two parcels, one having 60 ft. of frontage and the other having 55 ft. of frontage in lieu of the 60 ft. as required by the Ordinance Code. The property is located approximately 148 ft. east of Silver Lane and on the north side of Glencoe Avenue. Acting Secretary Palin discussed the staff report stating that the staff, in analyzing the request, had determined that parity with what exists in the general vicinity is two 57.5 ft. lots and a special privilege would consist if one 60 ft. lot and another 55 ft. lot were approved. The public hearing was opened. John Thomas, applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of his original request for a 60 ft. and a 55 ft. lot. Reg De La Cuesta addressed the Commission and spoke against the approval of the Conditional Exception. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY NEWMAN NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 76-126 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None -8- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes - H.B, Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 9 A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHEA AND SECONDED BY NEWMAN TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-10 TO PERMIT ONE 60 FT. LOT AND ONE 55 FT. LOT TO PERMIT ONE FOURPLEX AND ONE TRIPLEX WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances of con- �ditions applicable to the land, buildings, or premises involved, or the intended use of same that do not apply generally to the property or class of uses in the same district. 2. Such conditional exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. The granting of such conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the conforming land, property, or improvements in the neighbor- hood of the property for which such conditional exception is sought. 4. The applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes for which the conditional exception is sought. VOTE: AYES: Gibson, Shea, Newman NOES: Parkinson, Finley, Slates, Boyle ABSENT: None THE MOTION FAILED. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY PARKINSON CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 76-10 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: 1. There are exceptional circumstances of conditions applicable to the land, buildings, or premises involved, or the intended use of same that do not apply generally to the property or class of uses in the same district. 2. Such conditional exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. The granting of such conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the conforming land, property, or improvements in the neigh- borhood of the property for which such conditional exception is sought. 4. The applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes for which the conditional exception is sought. -9- 1/.18/77 - PC Minutes: H.B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 10 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan as applicant will be allowed the same number of units on the division as he would underneath the total allowed under the General Plan. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Boyle NOES: Shea, Newman ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY BOYLE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 76-69 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find that the proposed subdivision along with its design improvements is consistent with General and Specific Plans in the area in that: 1. The subdivision of this parcel into two 57.5 ft. lots will not allow more units than are allowed if property is not divided. 2. The two lot division of land and the development of two triplexes is in keeping with much of the existing development in the area. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map shall be revised to reflect two 57.5 ft. lots. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works -and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Glencoe Avenue shall be dedicated and improved to City standards at the time the parcels are developed. 4.' Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcels are developed. 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcels are developed. 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcels are developed. 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. -10- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes: H.B, Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 11 8. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time said parcels are developed. 9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Plan- ning Department. 10. All trees over 6 inches in diameter at a 6 ft. in height shall be retained or replaced at a ratio of two for one of a minimum size 24" box material. 11. Reciprocal drive easement shall be provided between the two parcels to provide vehicular ingress and egress for both parcels over the common drive. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7742 - REQUEST FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME Subdivider: Signal Landmark Engineer: The Stringer Company The map was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on June 17, 1975 and per Section 9940 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, approval shall expire 18 months from the date the map is ap- proved. Because of the delay on Final Tract 7742, the final unit of the overall project, the applicant has requested a one year ex- tension of time to provide adequate time for recordation of this final map. Commission discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY FINLEY THE APPLICANT WAS GRANTED A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME ON TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7742 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None STATUS REVIEW -OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-16 Applicant: A. C. Marion This is a review of conditions which were imposed on A. C. Marion, operator of a commercial horse stable located on the northwest corner of Goldenwest and Ellis. John Cope addressed the Commission and stated that the applicant had complied with all of the conditions except No. 6 which the staff felt was unnecessary since the applicant can dispose of waste material on the adjacent 5 acre parcel north of the site which is presently owned by the applicant. Commission discussion ensued. -11- 1/18/77 - PC Minutes: H,B. Planning Commission Tuesday, January 18, 1977 Page 12 ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY SLATES CONDITION NO. 6 OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-16 WAS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITION NO. 6 (MODIFIED) The applicant shall dispose of horse waste material on the adjacent 5 acre parcel north of subject site which is presently under owner- ship by the applicant. Should this property in the future not be available for waste disposal purposes, the applicant shall construct an all concrete three wall open storage bin for the temporary place- ment of waste materials. Said temporary storage shall not exceed 48 hours. Removal or destruction of the waste materials shall be subject to the approval of the Orange County Health Department. AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY BOYLE AND SECOND BY SHEA STATUS REPORT ON A. C. MARION WAS RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS Memo from Public Works Department ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY BOYLE VACATION OF SPEER STREET TO FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MORGAN LANE AND SPEER AVENUE WAS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson,. Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: None Residential Inspection Certificate Ordinance John Cope was directed to revise the transmittal and submit to City Council as soon as possible. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS: None STAFF'S COMMENTS: None The meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. to a meeting of January 25, 1977 at 7.00 P.M. t be held in Counci ham s o e 'v enter. ward D. Se ich Roggr D. Slates Acting Secretary Chairman -12- 1/18/77 - PC