Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-06-01MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-8 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1, 1977 - 1:15 PM BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS CITY STAFF PRESENT: CHUCK BURNEY, FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES: ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 11, 1977, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE AGENDA ITEM TO BE CONTINUED: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-26 Applicant: Home Federal Savings To permit installation of a 6'8" by 17'0" freestanding sign at a site having an existing freestanding sign, in lieu of Section 9760.7 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the west side of Main Street at the intersection of Main Street and Yorktown Avenue in a C2-0-CD, Community Business District combined with Oil Production and Civic Districts. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class V, California Envir- onmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Palin informed the Board that a request has been received from the applicant for continuance of this item to permit redesign of the total sign program for the shopping center in which subject project is located. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-26 WAS TABLED AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 2 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 77-54 (Cont. from 5-18-77) Applicant: John David King To permit construction of two (2) 8-unit apartment buildings ex- tending more than 150 feet from a public street pursuant to Section 9202.3.1.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the south side of Stark Street approximately 150 feet west of Beach Boulevard in an R3, Medium -High Density Residential District. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 77-60. Chairman Lipps reopened the public hearing. John King was present at the meeting. The Board reviewed the information contained in the negative declaration request and considered mitigation measures applicable to the project. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS THE BOARD, HAVING FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED ND 77-60 WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES B1 THROUGH B7 IMPOSED ON THE USE PERMIT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE There being no one present to speak for or against the project, the public hearing was closed. Secretary Palin reported that the revised plan is now in complete conformance with code requirements; it would, however, be the recommendation of the staff that the 26-foot building separation be reduced to twenty (20) feet in order to provide a fifteen (15) foot clear area on the opposite side. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS USE PERMIT NO. 77-54 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: FINDINGS OF THE BOARD: 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. BZA 6-1-77 Page 2 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 3 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the Master Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The revised plot plan received and dated May 31, 1977, shall be the approved conceptual layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual layout: • Traffic circulation and drives; • Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. In accordance with the City's standards and requirements, an additional five (5) feet of right-of-way on Stark Street shall be dedicated. 3. All applicable fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a mini- mum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be installed, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respectively. 2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 3. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers, and natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 4. Energy -saving lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lots and recreation areas. 5. Crime prevention techniques shall be applied to the design of the project (e.g., single -cylinder locks, etc.). BZA 6-1-77 Page 3 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 4 6. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 7. All holding tanks for toilet facilities shall be equipped for a capacity of 3.5 gallons if such facilities are available at the time of construction. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 77-19 (Cont. from 5-25-77) Applicant: Kaiser -Aetna To permit division of one 2.06 acre parcel into two (2) parcels pursuant to Section 9931 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located at the northwest corner of Argosy Drive and Graham Street in an M1-A, Restricted Manufacturing District. This request is covered by EIR 73-16, adopted by the City Council on March 18, 1974. John Hile and Roy Gohara were present at the meeting. The Board discussed the future drive locations and striping on Graham Street and informed the applicants that the two lots under consideration must be reoriented in a north -south direction in order to avoid adding to the number of access points off Graham. It was suggested that a reciprocal access from Graham through the easterly lot would provide access to both parcels from both streets; the devel- opers, however, expressed a desire that the map not be conditioned at this time to require such reciprocal drive. The Board agreed, cautioning them that as a result the most westerly parcel would be limited to right -turn -in and right -turn -out access to Argosy. It was the consensus of the Board and the developers that any condi- tion for reciprocals could be imposed at the time the parcels are actually developed. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 77-19 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCELS FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The tentative parcel map received and dated May 12, 1977, shall be the approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the De- partment of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 1 BZA 6-1-77 Page 4 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 5 3. Compliance with all applicable City ordinances. 4. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Planning Department. 5. The parcels shall be reoriented in a north -south direction, with the same dimensions as previously shown on the plan. 6. Parcel No. 2 (the most westerly parcel) shall be allowed right turn in and right turn out only. The access may be reciprocal at common property line with Parcel No. 1, if desired. 7. At the time development plans are submitted the Board shall review the additional vehicular access to Graham Street for Parcel No. 1. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-98 (Cont. from 5-25-77) Applicant: Hall and Lorensen Properties To permit construction of a 22,500 square foot industrial building pursuant to Section 9511 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the west side of Graham Street approximately 304 feet south of Argosy Avenue in an M1-A Restricted Manufacturing District. This request is covered by EIR 73-16, adopted by the City Council on March 18, 1974. Mr. Hall was present at the meeting and submitted revised drawings showing a common drive between subject parcel and the adjacent property. The Board reviewed the width of that drive, its depth of penetration into the lots, and the landscaping to be required. Chuck Burney informed the proponent that an onsite fire hydrant will be required. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-98 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The revised plan received and dated June 1, 1977, shall be the approved conceptual plan, subject to the modifications described herein: BZA 6-1-77 Page 5 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 6 a. The site plan shall reflect a maximum width of 17'6" for the reciprocal drive for ingress -egress on this property as well as 17'6" off the property to the north. b. This reciprocal access drive shall penetrate both properties for a depth of twenty-five (25) feet along the common property line. The modifications outlined above shall be depicted upon the plan submitted to the Department of Building and Community Develop- ment upon application for building permits. ,In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered ithe following issues relating to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; . Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Said plan shall comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscap- ing specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. A parcel map shall be filed and recorded prior to occupancy. 2. The parcel immediately to the north shall be granted only this reciprocal access with the subject property for ingress - egress on Graham Street. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-101 (Cont. from 5-25-77) Applicant: Eugene B. Zwick To permit construction of a 9,000 square foot industrial building pursuant to Section 9511 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the northwest corner of Argosy Drive and Graham Street in a 100-M1-A-20,000, Restricted Manufacturing District. This request is covered by EIR 73-16, adopted by the City Council on March 18, 1974. BZA 6-1-77 Page 6 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 7 Secretary Palin reported that the applicant has requested a continuance. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-101 WAS CONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOL- LOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-28 (In Conj./AR 77-100) Applicant: Henry G. DeLapp To permit a five (5) foot encroachment into the 10-foot interior side yard setback required where the unit or units are constructed at zero on the opposite side yard, in lieu of Section 9163.2.1.1(b) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the southwest corner of California Street and Joliet Avenue in an R2, Medium Density Residential District. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class V, California En- vironmental Quality Act, 1970. Chairman Lipps opened the public hearing. Henry DeLapp was present at the meeting and presented the following justifications for his variance request: 1) the 10-foot strip would be used for active recreational purposes and would create a nuisance to the adjoining neighbors, and 2) granting of the request is necessary to permit him to obtain the maximum use of his property. There being no other persons present to speak for or against the proposal, the public hearing was closed. The request was reviewed by the Board. Secretary Palin pointed out discrepancies on the plan - e.g., insufficient information has been submitted to permit parking calculations to be made, eaves are shown overhanging the property line on the front elevations, and doors and balconies have been shown in the elevation proposed at zero. Mr. DeLapp explained that each duplex has two bedrooms and indicated that the overhang and openings in the zero wall were in error. It was the consensus of the Board that the intent of the provisions allowing zero setback was not to permit the bulk of construction to be increased on a property but rather to consolidate the setbacks into a usable, ten foot open space and allow flexi- bility in siting a building on a lot. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-28 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: BZA 6-1-77 Page 7 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 8 REASONS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proponent has failed to demonstrate sufficient hardship to justify granting of the request. 2. Granting of subject request would be establishing an undesir- able precedent by allowing the bulk of a building to be increased via the conditional exception application. 3. A ten -foot side yard is a viable area for passive purposes when properly designed into a development. 4. Granting of the request would constitute granting of special privilege not enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning classification. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE The Chairman explained the appeal procedure to the applicant. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-100 (In Conj./CE 77-28) Applicant: Henry G. DeLapp To permit construction of two (2) dwelling units on Site 2 and one (1) dwelling unit on Site 1, to be constructed at zero on the interior common property line pursuant to Section 9163.2.1.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the southwest corner of California Street and Joliet Avenue in an R2, Medium Density Residential District. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class III, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Mr. DeLapp was present at the meeting and the Secretary explained to him the options he had on this project in light of the denial of the conditional exception request, said options being a continu- ance to permit a revised site plan in compliance with code to be submitted or denial without prejudice in the event that he desires to appeal the variance. The latter option would permit both actions to be appealed concurrently. If the applicant wishes to do so he can request that the administrative review be referred back to the Board, with the stipulation that it will then be revised to comply, in the event that the Planning Commission sustains the Board's denial. After further discussion, the applicant indicated his intention to appeal. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-100 WAS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 1 BZA 6-1-77 Page 8 1 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 9 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-29 Applicant: Sally Likens To permit the construction of a 182 square foot garage addition which encroaches five (5) feet into the required rear yard set- back in lieu of Section 9103.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, and to permit an addition of approximately 100 square feet to an existing single-family dwelling on subject site, located on the southwest corner of Prescott Lane and Fenley Drive in an R1, Low Density Residential District. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class V, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Chairman Lipps opened the public hearing. Sally Likens was present at the meeting and addressed the Board to present her justifica- tion of hardship. She noted that recent vandalism and theft on the property make it necessary to have additional space which can be locked; that her rear yard abuts the neighboring side yard, which is a five foot setback; and that a survey of the neighborhood had produced no opposition to her proposal. There being no other persons to speak for or against the proposal, the public hearing was closed. The Board reviewed the request, considering the precedent setting character of the request, the City requirements for two enclosed spaces only on a single-family lot, and possible alternatives. Sergio Martinez researched the files and found only one other vari- ance in the neighborhood of subject request, for open space en- croachment in the rear yard. After extensive discussion, the Board and the applicant_co_n_cu_rr_ed_on_a_w_eek's__continuance to permit research of othareas of the City for similar variances. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-29 WAS CONTINUED, WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF THE APPLICANT, TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 8, 1977, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY NOES: LIPPS ABSENT: NONE Chairman Lipps explained his "no" vote as follows: Findings of hardship must be based upon some unique characteristic of the property in size, shape, or configuration. No such characteristics exist on subject property, and a continuance only offers false hopes that the variance can be granted -at the subsequent meeting. BZA 6•-1-77 Page 9 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 10 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-30 Applicant: John D. Barry To permit the reduction of the minimum dimension of open space from the required twenty (20) feet to fifteen (15) feet for an addition to a single-family dwelling in lieu of Section 9103.3.1.1.2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the south side of Kapaa Drive approximately 304 feet west of Kaneohe Lane in an Rl, Low Density Residential District. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class V, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Chairman Lipps opened the public hearing. Mr. and Mrs. Barry were present at the meeting and described the layout of their dwelling on the property as the justification for the request. There being no other persons to address the Board in regard to the request, the public hearing was closed. Board review considered the lot coverage and size of existing unit, square footage of open space, and original siting of the dwelling. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY PALIN CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-30 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS OF THE BOARD: 1. The original siting of the dwelling on the lot creates, in essence, a substandard lot. 2. The applicant does provide well over the minimum required square footage in open space. 3. The Board has on past occasions approved open space require- ments similar in nature to this, with reduction in dimensions. 4. The location of the addition still provides a minimum dimen- sion of twenty (20) feet at that location for open space purposes. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The site plan received and dated May 19, 1977, shall be the approved layout. 2. All applicable fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE BZA 6-1-77 Page 10 1 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 11 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-31 Applicant: Leon E. Dubov To permit a three (3) foot encroachment into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in lieu of Section 9103.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located on the east side of Deer - vale Lane at the southeast corner of the intersection of Deervale and Candlewood Drive in an R1, Low Density Residential District. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class V, California En- vironmental Quality Act, 1970. Chairman Lipps opened the public hearing. Leon Dubov was present to represent the application and cited the shallow depth of the subject lot as the factor necessitating the variance. There being no other persons to address the Board in regard to this request, the public hearing was closed. In its review the Board considered the proximity to Bushard Street and the noise impacts which could result from that arterial. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 77-31 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: REASONS FOR DENIAL: 1. The applicant has failed to demonstrate sufficient hardship to justify granting of the request. 2. Bedrooms of reasonable size could be constructed at the rear of the dwelling in conformance with the required ten (10) foot setback from an arterial highway. . 3. Granting of the request would establish a dangerous precedent and generate future requests of a similar nature in the com- munity. 4. Construction of the addition at the required setback would be subjecting the occupants to excessive noise levels from the adjacent arterial highway. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE The applicant was informed of the appeal procedure. BZA 6-1-77 Page 11 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 12 USE PERMIT NO. 77-57 Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. L. R. Peterson To permit construction of a new single-family dwelling and a one -bedroom apartment on a site having two existing apartment units pursuant to Section 9161.4(2) of the Huntington Beach Ord- inance Code, located at the southwest corner of Indianapolis Avenue and Florida Street in an R2, Medium Density Residential District. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class III, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Chairman Lipps opened the public hearing. L. R. Peterson was present at the meeting. There being no persons to address the Board in regard to this project, the public hearing was closed. The Board pointed out deficiencies on the submitted plans: 1) a ten (10) foot dedication will be required on Indianapolis Avenue (designated as an arterial) which will require relocation of the structures; 2) garage setback from Florida Street will be required to be twenty-two (22) feet; and 3) building separation is required by code to be fifteen (15) feet between main struc- tures. Attachment of the buildings would be permitted. The Board reviewed the effect of the recent Specific Plan for the area upon this application, and an opinion will be obtained from the office of the City Attorney as to whether a revised plan can be treated under the old provisions. Applicant will be notified of the ruling prior to revision of his drawings. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY USE PERMIT NO. 77-57 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 22, 1977, WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-102 Applicant: Superior Equity Enterprises, Inc. To permit construction of two (2) single-family dwellings pursuant to Section 9354.16 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, loc- ated on the east side of 15th Street approximately 150 feet north of Olive Avenue in the Townlot Specific Plan Area One, Section B. This request is a Categorical Exemption, Class III, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Spyros Halikis was present to represent the application. Board review found the plan to be in compliance with code require- ments; it was also agreed that the applicant's expressed intention I BZA 6-1-77 Page 12 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 13 to possibly reverse the plan on the lot would be acceptable. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-102 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The revised plan submitted and dated May 25, 1977, shall be the approved conceptual layout. If the proponent chooses to reverse the plan on the site, that will be an allowed alternative layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: • Traffic circulation and drives; . Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. In accordance with the City's standards and requirements, an additional two and one-half (2-1/2) feet of right-of- way on the alley shall be dedicated. 3. All applicable fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MISCELLANEOIIS AGENDA ITEMS: SPECIAL EVENT NO. 77-7 Applicant: Huntington Beach High School Band To permit a fund-raising rummage sale to be held in the Seacliff Shopping Center parking lot on Saturday, June 4, 1977. No one was present to represent the application. The Board re- viewed the request as submitted. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS SPECIAL EVENT NO. 77-7 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: BZA 6-1-77 Page 13 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 14 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The plot plan received and dated June 1, 1977, shall be the approved project. 2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits. 3. An onsite inspection by the Fire Department shall be required prior to the event. 4. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the License Division of the Finance Department ten (10) days prior to the event. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE USE PERMIT NO. 76-80 (Revision) Applicant: Andrew Lopez To permit an existing curb cut and driveway off Indianapolis Ave- nue to remain for use as extra parking for a previously approved duplex located on the south side of Indianapolis Avenue approxi- mately 185 feet east of Alabama Street. After review of the request and the prior action in granting the use, it was the consensus of the Board that an access of this nature should not be permitted to remain on Indianapolis, which has been designated as an arterial. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS THE REQUEST FOR REVISION ON USE PERMIT NO. 76-80 WAS DENIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE USE PERMIT NO. 76-52 (Elevations) Applicant: Glenn Busby Review and approval of elevations for the California Federal Sav- ings and Loan building within a previously shopping center (per prior conditions of approval) located on the southeast intersec- tion of Goldenwest Street and Edinger Avenue. The submitted elevations were reviewed by the Board. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS THE ELEVATIONS FOR USE PERMIT NO. 76-52 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: BZA 6-1-77 Page 14 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 15 CONDITION OF APPROVAL: The elevations received and dated May 25, 1977, shall be the approved elevations for the California Federal Savings and Loan building, with the stipulation that this approval shall not affect the over all sign program previously approved for the center, nor shall it have any effect upon the site plan and layout as far as parking and circulation. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 76-141 (Revision) Applicant: Foxx Development Corporation To permit revisions to a previously approved plan for three (3) single-family dwellings located on the southeast corner of 20th Street and Orange Avenue. Secretary Palin noted that this is one of a number of revisions to the plan; this requires going back to the originally approved layout (September 6, 1976) changing the front yard setback slightly to increase open space. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS THE REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 76-141 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received and dated June 1, 1977, shall be the approved plan for Lot 24, address: 324 20th Street. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 76-143 (Revision) Applicant: Foxx Development Corporation To permit revisions to a previously approved plan for five (5) single-family dwellings located on the west side of 17th Street northerly from the intersection with Pecan Avenue. The Board reviewed the revised plans. ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY CROSBY THE REVISED PLAN FOR AD- MINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-143 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: Page 15 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 1, 1977 Page 16 CONDITION OF APPROVAL: The site plan received and dated June 1, 1977, shall be the approved layout for Lots 5, 7, and 9 on 17th Street. AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. (z 'r --- Q a es W. Palin, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments :df BZA 6-1-77 Page 16