Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-08-08MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-8, Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1979 - 1:15 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Lipps, Crosby, Burney MINUTES: ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1979, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Crosby NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Burney REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 79-25 (Cont. from 8/l/79) Applicant: The Huntington Partnership To permit the expansion and amendment to an existing retail center and marina located on the east side of Pacific Coast Highway, approxi- mately 660 feet southeast of Anderson Street. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No; 79-54. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY THE BOARD, HAVING FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 79-54 WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES CONTAINED IN USE PERMIT NO. 79-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS B-5 THROUGH B-10 IMPOSED ON THE USE PERMIT APPLICATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None Mr. John Cope was present to represent the application. Chairman Crosby outlined the proposal to the Board. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Cope submitted a letter to the Board in which he stated he had outlined the four elements of the proposed amendment, as being (1) the addition of a banking drive-thru teller facility; (2) architectural block outs for additional retail/office square footages of 20,000 square feet on Area D, and 25,000 square feet on Area E; (3) The plotting of the new Anderson Street alignment as presently approved by both the City and Cal Trans; and (4) an expansion of the marina by 81 additional slips. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Two Mr. Cope further stated that he had met with Planning Staff to discuss the justification of joint use production. He added that the parking need .for the addition is almost totally nighttime and weekend parking which does not conflict with the financial institutions or the office users during the day. In summation, Mr. Cope stated that the marina parking needs are 213 spaces which will be"offset by the fact -that The Huntington Partnership has entered into legal agreements with both Broadmoor Homes, Inc. and Continental Development which, when combined, are building 289 residential units, and added that these agreements provide for a first right of refusal for each condo owner. Based on existing percentages of 40 percent capture rate, these agreements will reduce the marina parking by 116 spaces. Bruce Crosby noted concern over possibility of marina intruding into the channel thereby establishing a pier head line.. Mr. Cope stated that the proposal has received verbal approval from the Corps of Engineers, City of Seal Beach, and the County and that proposed utility lines are proposed to be broughtthrough the condominiums to the south. There being no other parties present to speak on the application, the public hearing was closed. Board discussed proposal and cited findings and conditions of approval. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY USE PERMIT NO. 79-25 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOL - LOWING VOTE: FINDINGS• 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; , b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. -The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Three CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan received and dated June 29, 1979, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifications described herein: a. Applicant shall submit elevations and floor plans to the Secretary of the Board. A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works for new or modified landscaping only. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. The parties concerned in the joint use of the off-street parking facility shall evidence an agreement for such joint use by a proper legal instrument approved by the City Attorney as to form and content,recorded with the Orange County Recorder, and a copy filed with the Department of Development Services. 2. The parking reduction shall meet all requirements of Section 9794.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3. The reduction in parking shall not -exceed twenty-seven (27) percent. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Four 4. The marina meet - all- requirements' -of the Public -Works Department of the City of Huntington Beach. 5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 6. Low volume heads shall be used on all indoor spigots. 7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus" or unusable mate•rlal;`'``shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 8.." If lighting is included in the parking lot, energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide)..• All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 9,. -•A plan, -for silt control for all storm runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project shall be submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board staff for their review prior to the issuance of grading permits. 10. If dredging,i's necessary, _silt'screens shall be used to control turbidity during construction. AYES: Lipps, . Crosby, .. Burney NOES; None ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL -EXCEPTION NO. 78--55. Applicant: Commissariat -Design,:' To permit zero ,construction..on= an sinterior- side 'yard located on the south :side of Aldrich-Street,l i approximately' :1-00 feet east of Parkside Lane in an R3 District. IN CONJUNCTION WITH: USE PERMIT NO. 78-57 Applicant: Commissariat, Desion To permit a portion of a six -unit apartment building to be more than 150 feet from a public street located on the south side of Aldrich Street; approximately 100 feet east of Parksi-de Lane in an R3 District. These applications -are covered by Negative Declaration No. 78-114, previously approved. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Five Mr. Jack Schmier and Mr. Jim Moore, were present to represent the applications. Secretary Lipps introduced the applications to the Board and gave a brief history. He stated that the applications had been previously approved on November 22, 1978, at which time, due to a clerical error, an adjoining property owner was inadvertently not notified of the public hearing, therefore, the applications were renotified to allow the property owner to the east to be present at the hearing. The Chairman opened the public hearing. Mr. Alan Knox, representing adjoining property owner, Mr. Topocer, addressed the Board and requested to hear from the representatives of the application prior to his ad- dressing the Board. Mr. Jack Schmier stated that these applications had been previously approved and expressed regret that all adjoining property owners had not been notified at the original hearing. He further said that he was asking for a zero setback because this was the only way he could acquire the required parking spaces. He then stated that he was conditioned to erect.a decorative masonry wall along the zero setback and that he had no objection to do so. Mr. Schmier stated that he was unsuccessful in obtaining reciprocal drive with the adjacent property owner, therefore, decided to apply for the conditional exception. Secretary Lipps stated that due to the lot width and ratio of depth, it was impossible to develop the property with proper turning radius with the granting of a conditional exception; and therefore, the applicant was conditioned to provide a maintenance free masonry wall along that zero property line. Mr. Knox, representing Mr. Topocer, addressed the Board and stated that it was a misstatement of fact that the applicant would have an inability for future driveway. Mr. Topocer addressed the Board and stated that he had a previous agreement with the applicant to build a common driveway, however, he chose to ignore that agreement and pursue a conditional exception. Mr. Schmier then stated that Mr. Topocer agreed to sell a portion of his lot to be utilized as a reciprocal drive between the two properties, however, he was unable to bear the cost of that portion of Mr. Topocer's property at that time. Mr. Topocer and Mr. Schmier did not agree as -to the way the recipro- cal drive could be used, and Chairman Crosby stated that it was not the Board's concern who was telling the truth, but that in fact, the Board would address itself to the application before them. The Board discussed other units within the vicinity, and agreed that a similar variance had been granted. Mr. Topocer expressed great concern over the length of the proposed wall along the zero setback line and objected to the wall extending along his property line. The reversing of the plan was discussed, and Mr. Schmier stated that the same condition would exist, only on the other side of the property, therefore, the identical situation would exist. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Six - Due to continuous arguing between the adjoining property owner and applicant, and restating the same objections, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Board discussion followed. Findings on original conditional exception and use',permit were reviewed by the Board. Board found same findings in reviewing the applications the second time. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY LIPPS CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 78-55 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING -FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS• 1: The granting of the Conditional Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent -upon other properties in the vicinity. 2.' Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings,'the strict'application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone,classifications. 3.The granting of'a Conditional Exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of 'a Conditional Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of a'"Conditional Exception will not adversely .affect the Master Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 6. The forty-five (45) foot lot width places physical constraints upon this property that limits the available area for turning radius into the garages. The .granting_of this conditional exception allows the applicant parity with other developments in the vicinity and under the same zoning classification. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 27, 1979 shall be the approved layout. B. GENERAL CONDITION: 1. The garage wall at zero (0) foot setback shall be con- structed of maintenance free decorative masonry. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Seven AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY LIPPS USE PERMIT NO. 78-57 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOL- LOWING VOTE: FINDINGS• 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. - 3.' The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 27, 1979, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity. 2. The garage wall along the east property shall be of decorative masonry subject to'thO approval of the Department of Develop- ment Services. This wall shall be of maintenance free masonry. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant shall post the area along the west driveway wall from a point opposite the southerly edge of the garages to the drive entrance with "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE." 2. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be'stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers. Minutes:- H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page = Eight 3. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 4. Low volume heads shall be used on all spigots', -and water faucets. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber,,wire,,pipe, and other surplus;or:,unusable material, shall be disposed of at, an offsite facility equipped to handle them...;. 6. The structures on they subject property, whether attached or de- tached,- shall.be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for,units.that lie within the 60.CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis,report, prepared under, the supervision of a .person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the -application for building permits. AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney . NOES: None ABSENT: -None USE PERMIT NO. 79-27 -Applicant: Crain Combs Association, To permit the'construction of a 68_unit apartment building located on side of Beach, Blvd.,_.approximately-500.ft. south of Taylor Drive. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 79-55. The Chairman introduced the.application to the,Board. The public hearing was opened: It was noted that all the adjoining property owners had not been properly.notified of.the.public.hearing, there- fore, the Chairman recommended a two week continuance for proper notification of adjoining property. owners,.. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY BURNEY USE PERMIT NO. 79-27 WAS CONTINUED-TO'AUGUST 22, 1979, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES:` None ABSENT:.- None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.-79-78 Applicant:. -Craig Combs Association To permit the construction of an office building located on the west side of Beach Blvd., approximately 500 ft. south of Taylor Drive. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 79-55. n I 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Nine ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY THE BOARD, HAVING FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 79-55 WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES CONTAINED IN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-78 GENERAL CONDITIONS B-3 THROUGH B-10 IMPOSED ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None Mr. Stan Uchizono, was present to represent the application. Secretary Lipps noted that the proposed project was within sub- stantial ordinance code conformance, except for proper turning radius. The applicant will be required to provide a revised plan to the Secretary of the Board depicting proper turning radius. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-78 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A., TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 16, 1979, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifi- cations described herein: a. Revise parking lot to show a minimum twenty seven (27) foot turning radius into parking space. A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation the immediate vicinity; to property and improvements in . Past administrative action regarding this property Minutes: H.B. Board,of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Ten 2. The following plans shall be submitted-to,.the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington,Beach Ordinance Code.and landscaping specifications on file -in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all_ rooftop mechanical equip- ment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment:"' -. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 0 1. Due to,the parking .ratio, building.use shall be limited to - General Office only.' 2. This parcel shall grant access easement to Parcel No. 3 as shown'on plan. Easement to, be filed with the City and recorded with the County'of Orange prior to occupancy. 3. Natural gas and 220' electrical shall'be 'stubbed`in at the location of clothes dryers. 4. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. ' 5. Low volume heads shall be used on all indoor spigots. 6. All building spoils, -'such as unusable lumber-,` wire, pipe, and other surplus or' unusable material, shall. be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them'. 7., The structures'on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the.property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision -of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permits., All measures -recommended to mitigate -noise to acceptable levels shall -be incorporated into the design of the project. 8. If lighting is included in the parking lots- energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties.. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Eleven 9. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 10. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 11. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this develop- ment shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project shall be submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board staff for their review prior to the issuance of grading permits. 13. Information on equipment or facilities which may generate air pollutants shall be submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District staff for their review prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use within the building. AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-80 Applicant: Art Shapiro To permit a subdivision sales office and model home located on the northeast corner of Admiralty and Grimaud Lane. - This application is covered by EIR 75-1, approved -by the City Council on January_5, 1976. Mr. Art Shapiro, the applicant was present._ Board reviewed the proposal and found -same -to be-withiri-ordinance code conformance. Conditions of approval were discussed. OK MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY BURNEY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-80 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: "Minutes: H.B.-Board of -Zoning- Adjustments Wednesday, August-8,-1979 Page -,Twelve CONDITIONS OF -APPROVAL: A.--TO-}-BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: - The conceptual plot plan and elevations received•July 20,-1979 shall be the approved layout. B.-- GENERAL- CONDITION: �1. Model sales office and signs to conform to Section 9730.18 aridiArticle 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. AYES: Lipps; Crosby, Burney NOES: 'None ABSENT: Norte ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO: 79-81' Applicant: Christiana Community Builders To permitthe'use of subdivision sales office and model homes located on -Ventura Drive and.Typhoon Lane, within Tract 8636 (1,100 ft. south of Edinger Ave., both sides of Trinidad) This application is covered by EIR 74-6, previously approved. Mr. Buddy Moritomo was present to tepresent the application.' The Board reviewed the -proposal and found,same to be within ordinance code conformance. The applicant-was.made aware of relocation procedures and that he must comply with Section 9730 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY--LIPPS AND' SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-81 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS -OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE'COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING -PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 20, 1979, shall be the approved layout. B: GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sales office to comply with Section 9730.18 and all signs to comply with -Article 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 2. The applicant shall obtain building relocation permit. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Thirteen AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-82 Applicant: Dewavne Brown To permit the construction of a 11,340 sq. ft. industrial building located on the south side of Oceanus, approximately 660 ft. east of Triton. This request is covered by EIR 73-16, approved March 18, 1974 by the City Council. The applicant was not present. The Chairman outlined the proposal to the Board. The Secretary noted a shortage in parking and sug- gested parking requirements be made a condition of approval. He further stated that the remainder of the proposal was within substantial ordinance code conformance. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-82 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 23, 1979, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifi- cations described herein: a. Revise parking or reduce building size to comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan 'complies with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to.the Secretary of the Board: Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page rourteen a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of�the Huntington Beach Ordinance•Code and landscaping specifications -on file in the Department of --Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan.* Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop -mechanical equip- ment and shall delineate the type of `material proposed to,screen said equipment. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Development to'comply,-with all conditions -of approval,of' Tentative, Tract No". 868,8. 2. Roadway be,shown as Fire Lane on plan.. AYES: ­Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-83 Applicant: Manthei%Buccella Investments:_ To permit the construction of a mini storage complex -located on Gothard Street,.approximately 468,feet north of Talbert Ave.' This request is covered by,Negativeybeclaration-No'.'79-15, previously approved. Messrs. Buccella and,Mant'hei were present -to, represent the application. Secretary Lipps outlined t-he proposal to the.Board..,He stated that the applicants had received previous,approval for this property for the proposed storage of recreational vehicles. Secretary Lipps noted that the parking spaces were not shown on the plan and noted concern, over access,to .the property. Board member Burney stated that a restriction fl£--emergency access was in existence." Mr. Manthei suggested that the -emergency access could'be-transferred to adjacent property for which -the -.applicants -have an.emergency vehicle access agreement_,with •,the".property owner of, that parcel. Further drive widths and" emergency vehicle- circulation' was-'disscussed. Board discussion"followed." Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY LIPPS_AND SECOND BY CROSBY,,ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-83 WAS'"APPROVED WITH THE"FOLLOWING CONDITIONS,"BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: i� Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Fifteen CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 24, 1979, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifi- cations described herein: a. Revise plan to show required parking per Article 979. b. Revise plan to provide a minimum.twenty-five (25) foot opening from emergency access easement through Parcel #3 into drive area of Parcel #4. C. Revise plan to provide a minimum twenty-four (24) foot drive width connecting Parcels #2 and #3. A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the modifications out by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all -rooftop mechanical equip- ment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen'said equipment. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Developer shall provide the City of Huntington Beach a twenty- five (25) foot emergency access easement through Parcel #3 to Parcel #4. Said easement shall be filed with the Depart- ment of Development Services and recorded with the Orange County Clerk. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning,Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Sixteen 2; Mitigating measures --as set out in-Ne ative. Declaration No. 79-15'. 3. Developer shall submit a lighting plan to -be approved by the .Secretary of the Board, prior to issuance of permits for same. 4ti, Thirty_ -two (32)-foot drive areas throughout -development shall be marked Fire Lane to Fire Department --specifications with parking limited to -one side., AYES: Lipps, NOES: None ABSENT: -None Crosby, Burney USE "PERMIT NO. 79-29, Applicant:-�RMI-Architecture/Plannincr To permit the�establishment.of a discotheque.,located at the southeast corner of,Garfield and Magnolia. This -request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 78-57, previously approved. Messrs. Dayton Meyer and Michael Lasley were present to represent the application. Chairman'Crosby outlined -the proposal to the Board. The -public hearing was opened. Mr. Dayton Meyer addressed the Board and -stated his request for a 6,000 square'foot disco in'a!shopping center now under construction. Mr. Meyer stated that an acoustical analysis has been completed and that he has received input of pitfalls of other.disco's in the area, thereby attempting to'eliminate problems before they start.. There being no other parties present to speak on`the application, the public hearing was closed. 1 .. Secretary--Lipps''informed- the: application .that the City of Huntington Beach has recently adopted a new Noise Ordinance and further stated that it would be strictly enforced. He then.cautioned the Board that the Board must find that -a proposal -will not be detrimental to surrounding -properties under a use permit application. Board dis- cussion followed. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY USE -PERMIT NO. 79-29 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, August 8, 1979 Page Seventeen FINDINGS• 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely -affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 23, 1979 shall be the approved layout. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to implement all recommendations as set forth in the Acoustical Analysis submitted to,the Board on August 8, 1979. AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS• SPECIAL EVENT NO. 79-19 Applicant: Gloria Zianer & Assoc. To permit a preview party for Broadmoor Homes'to be -held August 24, 1979 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. located,at 16440 Martin Lane, Huntington Beach, Calif. Ms. Lorie Ross and Mr. Tom Ruiz were present to represent the application. The Board reviewed the plan with the applicants and discussed the conditions of approval with them. Board member Burney stressed the importance of Fire Department inspection,prior to the event. Minutes:- H.B.. Board of Zoning.Adjustments Wednesday, August 8', 1979- Page.Eighteen ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY LIPPS SPECIAL.EVENT NO. 79-19 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The plot..plan" received August 3.,, 1979., : shall be- the approved layout. 2. The 'applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits. 3. An on -site inspection by'theliire Department shall be required prior to.the event. 4. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed'in the Finance - Department five (5) days prior:to.the event. - AYES: Lipps, Crosby, Burney' NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 THERE BEING NO FURTHER'BUSINESS';'THE MEETING WAS AJOURNED. Walter Lipps,-Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments