Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-10-31MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-8, Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Calif. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31, 1979 - 1:15 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS: Spencer, Crosby, Ott APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ON MOTION BY OTT AND SECOND BY CROSBY, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 24, 1979 WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Spencer REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-48 (Cont. from 10/17/791 Applicant: Robert Blinn To allow a zero foot setback in lieu of a 30 foot setback located on the east side of Gothard Street, approximately 295 feet south of Slater Avenue. This application is a categorical exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The Chairman introduced the application to the Board. It was noted that this request was to be heard in conjunction with Administrative Review No. 79-92, for which revised plans have been submitted. Therefore, it was concluded that Conditional Exception No. 79-48 was unnecessary for the processing of the total project. The Chairman opened the public hearing. There being no parties present to speak on the application, the public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-48 WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE BOARD AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Two ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-92 (Cont. from 10/17/79) Applicant: Robert Blinn To permit the construction of a 5,568 sq. ft. industrial building located on the east side of Gothard Street, approximately 295 ft. south of Slater Avenue. This application is covered by Negative Declaration No. 79-26, approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on April 18, 1979. Mr. Robert Blinn, the applicant, was present. Board discussed the revised plan submitted by the applicant. The Secretary noted that a plan check revealed the revised plan to be within substantial'ordinance code conformance. Board discussion ensued. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-92 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 26, 1979, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall'be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equip- ment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Three ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-108 Applicant: Pacific Southwest Realty Company To permit an addition to an existing bank building located on the south side of Edinger, approximately 732 feet west of Springdale. This request is a categorical exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Mr. Crudutt was present to represent the application. Secretary Spencer introduced the application to the Board and noted that a plan check revealed the application to be within ordinance code conformance. Conditions of approval were dis- cussed. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-108 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 15, 1979, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant shall comply with all sections of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code requirements. AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Four USE PERMIT NO. 79-29 Abiplicant: RMI Architecture/Planning To permit the establishment of a discotheque located at the south- east corner of Garfield and Magnolia. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 78-57, previously approved. Bruce Crosby gave a brief history of this application. He stated that the application came before the Board of Zoning Adjustments on August 8, 1979 and was subsequently conditionally approved on that date. Notices were sent out to abutting property owners prior to the August 8 meeting and no one appeared at that meeting. It was then discovered that three abutting property owners were not noti- fied of the August 8 hearing, thus another hearing was scheduled for this date. Mr. Crosby further informed the Board that great concern had been expressed by concerned citizens about the possibility of allowing a liquor license to be issued to the proposal, and directed his comment to the audience that the zoning did allow the applicant to file for a liquor license if he so desired. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Dayton Meyer and Mike Lasley, representing RMI Architecture, were present to represent the application. Mr. Meyer gave a brief presentation on the proposal. He stated that the proposed disco- theque was to open at 9:00 p.m. and close at 2:00 a.m: seven days a week: A private security force is proposed for the sports -oriented disco. He proposed the rear exit be used for emergency purposes only during hours of operation and that this door would be used during the day for deliveries. Mr. Paul Hill addressed the Board and presented the following views, which he stated represent the feelings of the homeowners, to the Board: They as homeowners, feel strongly that a disco should not be situated in the proposed location. Their concerns revolved around increased vehicle traffic and overflow of parking onto adjacent side streets and nearby circles, possibly causing an increase in accidents. Another concern was an increase in noise after closing hours, i.e., loud talking and laughter can result in frequent partying and alter- cations, loud car radios, etc. Another concern was the possibility of "cruising" of vehicles in the neighborhood residential area. Another concern was the increase of litter, such as bottles, soft drink and beer cans, paper trash and other debris which tend to accumulate. Yet another concern Mr. Hill presented was that three abutting homes have second story bedroom windows within 15 feet of the wall separating the disco area from the residents, he felt this to be a potential problem that speaks for itself. His final concern was that the resi- dents believe that the crime rate in this area will increase if the LJ Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Five disco permit is granted. Mr. Hill concluded that their present "good neighbor" and "watch programs" have provided them with one of the lowest crime rate neighborhoods in Huntington Beach, and they do not wish to forfeit this distinction of which they are very proud. From visits to other discos in the City, and from information gathered on discos outside our City, Mr. Hill felt that if the permit were to be granted, neighborhood troubles would surely start. Furthermore, five of the neighbors during recent weeks have decided to place their homes up for sale due to the proposed disco. Finally, Mr. Hill, speaking for residents in the neighbor- hood, said that the experience of the other disco areas, all of which are surrounded by commercial or light industrial develop- ment, cannot be used for projecting the detrimental impact that might be expected to their family oriented neighborhood. Mr. John Bolenger of Heatherton Circle addressed the Board and stated his main concerns about the proposed disco as an increase in traffic and noise. He further stated that the Glenmar West Tract is a quiet neighborhood in Huntington Beach with a low crime rate. Due to previous experience he said that discos often operate well after 2:00 a.m. and thus the noise objections from traffic and possibly the disco itself would be well into the morning hours. He further stated that he had heard that there is a certain amount of glass proposed in the building, and could not possibly see how noise could be attenuated through glass. Con- cern was stated about a possible increase in vandalism, possible gambling could be created and the possibility of narcotics and prostitution was voiced. The possibility of degrading the high quality of the neighborhood was also a major concern of Mr. Bolenger. Mr. Thomas Whalen of Heatherton Circle addressed the Board and stated that the approval of the proposed disco would result in the depreci- ation of property value, furthermore, depreciation has already taken effect while the proposal is still within the planning stage, and that greater losses could be expected upon approval of the appli- cation. Mr. Jerry Bramlett of.Randi Lane addressed the Board and stated that the closest home from the proposed disco is only 65 feet, which is not enough distance. He stated that only a shell exists at present of the building and that the Board take this into consider- ation. He further stated that he was led to believe by the property owner of the shopping center that a clothing store was proposed in that location, thereby the lack of people attending the previous meeting resulted due to the fact that a majority believed a clothing store would be placed in that location. Ellis Biderson of Randi Lane addressed the Board and stated that he had contacted the Planning Department as to what would be built in the location behind his home and was told at that time that only Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Six retail stores were proposed and nothing of a loud or controversial nature was allowed. He further stated that he would not have pur- chased his home had he known a disco was proposed in that location. Mike Rodgers of Nutwood Circle addressed the Board and stated his objection to the proposed disco. He stated he was not against discos per se, but that he was opposed to the disco at that particular location, being a residential oriented neighborhood. Dennis Brown of Randi Lane addressed the Board and questioned the environmental process of the proposed disco. Board member Spencer explained to Mr. Brown that the shopping center_had-_its environ- mental review as a whole, andthat all allowed uses within the C-2 zone were analyzed. Mr. _ Brownfurther stated that the owners of the center have lost the good neighbor policy and that the builders have neglected the feeling and value of property that they abut. He requested the Board to reconsider approving the disco. Mr. Herb Dysings of Randi Lane addressed the Board and expressed concern about possible littering problems and possible noise problem that could result from the proposed disco. He felt the disco should be located in an industrial area rather than abutting a residential area. He stated that the neighborhood has a high quality at present because of concerned and involved citizens to keep the neighborhood safe and clean. Mr. Dick Gardner of Wilhelm Circle addressed the Board and stated that he was one of the people that was not notified originally. He stated that 16 children lived on his block and he was concerned about their lifestyle being altered. He expressed further concern about the changing of mood and atmosphere of the neighborhood were the disco be granted. He concluded by stating that he would have attended the first meeting had he been notified. Ms. Linda Bridges of Heatherton Circle addressed the Board and expressed her main concern about the possibility of noise drifting into the residential area. Jack Brooks addressed the Board and stated concern over people leaving the discos and the crowd enforcement problem that could occur. He further stated that traffic jams would be created if the disco is*popular with potential masses of overflow of people. He also cited concern over possible narcotics use in the area as well.as prostitution. Also homes may be broken into by narcotics users to feed their habits. Dick Gardner of Wilhelm Circle addressed the Board again and stated that he travels frequently and that he worries a great deal for his family's safety while on a trip. In his travels he said that discos are never located in residential areas. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Seven Frances Miner addressed the Board and stated that she was not notified of the hearing and felt that the impact of the disco is wider than 300 feet radius. Martha Valentine addressed the Board and cited concern over the disco attracting a vast number of teenagers since they do not have to adhere to a 10:00 p.m. curfew anymore. Norma Boyles expressed concern about people going into discos that are under age 21, and opposed the disco being placed in a resi- dential area. Marilyn Woodruff questioned the capacity of the proposed disco. The Board informed her it was 402 people which is calculated by square footage of a building. Shirley Kemp addressed the Board and questioned why the Board had approved the application at the first hearing, and questioned whether the opposing citizens made a difference in the Board's decision. Chairman Crosby informed Ms. Kemp that all testimony is taken into consideration in the Board's decision. Jack Brooks again addressed the Board and felt that the attitude of the Planning Department and Planning Commission was that "to close their eyes" in certain instances and said they must keep in mind that "you people" (Board) represent "Us" (the people), "to protect us." He further indicated that the Board had neglected their responsibility in approving the disco, which should have not been approved in the first place according to Mr. Brooks. Pete Stoddard addressed the Board and stated that he felt the same way as all of the previous testimony, however, he summarized that he hoped the Board would render a decision in a democratic way, whereby the majority rules. Mr. Dayton Meyer of RMI Architects addressed the Board again and addressed himself to the zoning portion of the proposal. He stated that the proposal has ample parking, the hours of operation would not be past 2:00 a.m., proposed excessive landscaping to be also used as a buffer, in general, a high class disco is proposed, with no glass to be used in front or rear of the building. Mr. Meyer further felt that excessive partying after hours, gambling, narcotics, and prostitution were not tied in with discos. Ron Evans, owner of the proposed disco, addressed the Board and stated that it was not his intent to open a disco to interrupt present family living. He further stated that he had studied other discos to a great extent and felt he took the best of each one and combined them into his proposal. He said the proposed disco is oriented to people over 25 years of age, although 21 years and older are granted admittance. It was not his intent to create Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Eight parties in the parking lot, a cover charge will be placed on the discos admittance in hopes of attracting the upper class over 25 population. Mr. Evans presented renderings to the Board and audience of what is proposed within the disco. He also said that he intends to bring in old time music and that slides and movies of old time films and sports would also be shown. He stated that he has invested over $300,000 to date on various equipment and that he does not intend to allow admittance to teenagers. Permits were sought step by step by Mr. Evans as needed. He stated that the liquor license permit request was posted at Cie disco site for an extensive period of time, and that a sign was posted on the construction trailer of the proposed disco. It has also been published in the Huntington Beach newspaper three times. Mr. Evans concluded by saying that he is aware of potential problems, however, is attempting to alleviate any problems that may occur. Mr. Bob Cariker of Jednick Co., addressed the Board and stated that the proposed disco would be a show place and an asset to the community. Chairman Crosby closed the public hearing. Board discussion ensued. Pat Spencer discussed the intensity of the use and stated that a like use such as beer bar or restaurant with secondary use (dancing) were allowed uses in the C-2 zone and could be approved without a public hearing, thereby he did not feel the intensity of the proposed use was greater than those allowed by code. He stated that the City had adopted a Noise Ordinance which is enforced. Mr. Spencer then discussed the mandatory find- ings of a use permit that the Board must find prior to granting a use permit. Mel Ott felt it was unfair to deny an application because of possible problems that may result. He agreed with Mr. Spencer that he found it difficult to deny an application if a like use can be approved through an administrative review application. He further felt that most concerns could be handled with conditions of approval. Bruce Crosby felt that a great majority of the concerns stated by the homeowners were assumptions on their part, and felt a great deal of their concerns could be controlled or alleviated. He further informed the audience that noise problems can be controlled and cited examples of places that have been closed because of noise in Orange County. Chairman Crosby reopened the public hearing to allow audience members to.respond to Board's comments. Pete Stoddard addressed the Board again and felt that the disco is a fad type of item, however, the people are looking at the worst situations. He felt that if approval was granted to the disco, he would like to see a requirement of security, not assumed security to avoid traffic and other possible problems. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Nine Justus d'Arnaud addressed the Board and discussed various code sections, whereby they may overlap each other. He expects the rules of the code to be enforced. Dennis Brown addressed the Board again and requested that the Board consider the merits of the points raised by the people testifying at this hearing. John Bolenger addressed the Board again and stated that he heard the owner Mr. Evans, say that he was anticipating problems, and was taking steps to eliminate them. Mr. Evans said that he did not say he was anticipating problems, but rather was attempting to alleviate any problems that may affect the homeowners before they have a chance to happen. Chairman Crosby closed the public hearing. Findings and conditions of approval were discussed among Board members. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY OTT USE PERMIT NO. 79-29 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 23, 1979 shall be the approved layout. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Ten B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant shall implement all recommendations as set forth in the Acoustical Analysis submitted to the Board on August 8, 1979. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited t6-9-rG0p.m, until 2:00 a.m. 3. The rear door shall become an emergency exit only. 4. The applicant shall provide private security, number and procedure to be approved by the Police Department. 5. The City shall, through the County of Orange, conduct a noise investigation (after the fact). Said cost shall be borne by the applicant. AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None NOTE: Secretary Spencer stated that he would request a legal opinion from the City Attorney's Office regarding the appeal procedure for Use Permit No. 79-29. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-109 Applicant: Huntington Beach Company To permit a 25,800 sq. ft. office professional building located on the east side of Main Street, approximately 500 feet north of Yorktown Avenue and 350 feet east of Main Street (Building #3) This project is covered by Negative Declaration No. 76-92, previously approved. Board reviewed the proposal and found same to be within substantial ordinance code conformance. Location and approval of secondary access road was discussed and it was concluded that this access road shall be to the approval of the Fire Department. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY OTT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-109 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: C 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Eleven CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUA14CE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan received and dated October 17, 1979, shall be the approved layout, for Phase III only. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The proponents shall be required to comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code for parking provisions. 3. The following plans shall be submitted to the Planning Depart- ment: a. Landscape and irrigation plans complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. Soil and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certi- fied soils engineer. Said reports shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shall be subject to approval by that Department. 5. Fire protection systems, including automatic sprinkler systems, standpipe systems, fire hydrants, fire alarm sys- tems, and any other required fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with the specifications of the Huntington Beach Fire Code. Plans for such systems and devices shall be submitted to the Fire Department and shall be subject to approval by the Department of Fire and Public Works. 6. The developer shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 7. All applicable fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Twelve B. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION: 1. Secondary access road through Phase TV to Yorktown Avenue shall be approved by the Fire Department. C. GENERAL CONDITIONS. 1. The elevations received and dated October 17, 1979, shall be the approved elevations. 2. A tentative parcel map shall be filed and approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments segregating this par --el from the remaining property held under the same ownership prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall comply with statemE:nts submitted to the City in Negative Declaration No. 76-92 in regard to lighting, building materials, and maintenance of the quality of the water areas. 4. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a mini- mum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respect- ively. In commercial and industrial projects, the "U" value of the structures shall offer the equivalent thermal insula- tion characteristics and may be calculated using ASHRAE methods. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 6. Use of energy saving lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lots. 9. The retention of existing tree stands within the project area is encouraged. AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None 11 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Thirteen USE PERMIT NO. 79-37 Applicant: Carlos A. Benevenia To permit the addition of a 15' x 91' building area to an existing restaurant building located on the southeast corner of Slater and Beach. This application is a categorical exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Mr. Gerald Lee, Architect, was present to represent the application. Chairman Crosby introduced the application to the Board. Mr. Lee explained the request as a proposed addition to an existing building to increase public toilet facilities and to allow for additional waiting rooms and banquet room. The public hearing was opened. There being no other parties present to speak on the application, the public hearing was closed. Board reviewed the request. Secretary Spencer noted that the plan check revealed the proposal to be within ordinance code conformance. Conditions of approval and findings were discussed. ON MOTION BY OTT AND SECOND BY CROSBY, USE PERMIT NO. 79-37 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS• 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 17, 1979, shall be the approved layout. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Fourteen 2. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; • Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None SPECIAL EVENT NO. 79-26 Applicant: Rabbit Productions To permit a special event from November 10 through November 30, 1979 featuring art exhibits located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. The applicant was not present. Board reviewed the proposal and found some potential problems with the proposal. Therefore, a continuance was suggested to allow the applicant to be present at the meeting. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY OTT SPECIAL EVENT NO. 79-26 WAS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 7, 1979 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES:. Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-41 (Reconsideration) Applicant: Corona Construction & Development Company To permit a measurement of corner cutoff from curb line to curb line located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Orange. IN CONJUNCTION WITH: Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Fifteen CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-42 (Reconsideration) Applicant: Corona Construction & Development Company To permit a measurement of corner cutoff from curb line to curb line located on the southwest corner of 19th Street and Palm. IN CONJUNCTION WITH: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-43 (Reconsideration) Applicant: Corona Construction & Development Com;aan To permit a measurement of corner cutoff from curb line to curb line located on the southwest corner of 21st Street and Orange. IN CONJUNCTION WITH: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-46 (Reconsideration) Applicant: Corona Construction & Development Company To permit a measurement of corner cutoff from curb line to curb line located on the southeast corner of 21st Street and Palm. IN CONJUNCTION WITH: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-47 (Reconsideration) Applicant: Corona Construction & Development Company To permit a measurement of corner cutoff from curb line to curb line located on the southeast corner of 20th Street and Palm. These applications are Class 5 Exemptions, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Spencer noted that the Conditional Exception applications were brought back to the Board to set a new date for the applications to be heard by the Planning Commission. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NOS. 79-41, 79-42, 79-43, 79-46, and 79-47 WERE RECONSIDERED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY OTT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NOS. 79-41, 79-42, 79-43, 79-46, and 79-47 WERE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 1979 AT 7:00 P.M. OR SOON THEREAFTER AS IT MAY APPEAR ON THE AGENDA, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, October 31, 1979 Page Sixteen SPECIAL EVENT NO. 79-28 Applicant: Harold Witten, Ocean View High School To permit the operation of a school carnival to be held November 2, 3, and 4, 1979 located on the p&rking lot__at'the north side of Warner Avenue, approximately 1000 ft. west of Goldenwest Street. The applicant was not present. Board reviewed the proposal and found same to be within substantial ordinance code con- formance. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY OTT, SPECIAL EVENT NO. 79-28 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The plot plan received and dated October 30, 1979, shall be the approved layout. 2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits. 3. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department shall be required prior to the event. 4. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Finance Department five (5) days prior to the event. AYES: Spencer, Crosby, ,Ott NOES: None ABSENT: None THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. rles P. Spence Secretary Board of Zoning Majustments 1