HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-11-07 (7)MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Council Chambers, Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, Calif.
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1979 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
MINUTES: ON MOTION BY OTT AND SECOND BY CROSBY, THE MINUTES O�F
THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 31, 1979, WERE APPROVED
AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
SPECIAL EVENT NO. 79-26 (Cont. from 10/31/79)
Applicant: Rabbit Productions c/o Virginia Lawn
To permit a special event from November 10, 1979 through November
30, 1979 featuring Art Exhibits located on the northwest corner
of 19th Street and Pacific Coast Highway.
Secretary Spencer introduced the application to the Board. He
stated that the application had been continued from the previous
week to allow the applicant to be present to answer any concerns
the Board may have.
Ms. Virginia Lawn, the applicant, was present. She stated that
on site parking was not proposed,that visitors would have to
depend on street parking. She also inquired about the use of
a large six foot wide canvas to be used as a windbreak. Secre-
tary Spencer was concerned about possible sight obstruction if
such•a screen were erected. He suggested that the applicant
prepare a revised plan depicting type of material proposed for
windbreak for Fire Department review and also discuss same with
Department of Public Works for possible traffic obstruction.
It was proposed that the revised plan also reflect the layout
of isleways, what type of booths are proposed,which shall be
to the approval of the Fire Department.
Conditions of approval were discussed.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, SPECIAL EVENT NO.
79-26 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Two
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. No other structures other than those shown on the approved
plot plan dated October 19, 1979 are permitted.
2. The plot plan received and dated October 19, 1979, shall be
the approved plot plan.
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits.
4. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department shall be required
prior to the event.
5. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Finance
Department five (5) days prior to the event.
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-50
Applicant: Richard E. Borkovetz
To permit a 716" encroachment into front yard setback located on
the northeasterly side of Intrepid Lane, approximately 200 feet
from Broadway.
This application is a categorical exemption, Class 5, California
Environmental Quality Act, 1970.
Mr. Borkovetz was present to represent the application.
Chairman Crosby introduced the application to the Board then
requested Mr. Borkovetz to outline his proposal.
The public hearing was opened.
Mr. Borkovetz stated that he was seeking a variance to the required
15 foot requirement for a front yard setback to 7 ft. 6 in. because
the existing structure is presently located at a 7 ft. 6 in. set-
back. He further stated that when the original tract map was
approved, variances had been sought at that time for several
homes reduction in front yard setback, and were subsequently
approved. He is now asking for permission to construct a
trellis along the front portion of the property. He also
pointed out that an identical variance had been granted in the
area recently.
There being no other parties present to speak on the application,
the public hearing was closed.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Three
Board discussion ensued. Secretary Spencer stated that the
proposed open trellis and the fact that the wrought iron fence
at 7-1/2 ft. setback would coincide with the setback of neighbor-
ing property structures. Findings and condition of approval
were discussed.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 79-50 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITION,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS-
1. An open trellis coupled with the proposed wrought iron fence
at 7-1/2 ft. setback would coincide with the setbacks of
adjacent property structures.
2. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not constitute
a grant of a special privilege inconsistent upon other properties
in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification.
3. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location, or
surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance
is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed
by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classifications.
4. The granting of a Conditional Exception is necessary in order
to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property
rights.
5. The granting of a Conditional Exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property
in the same zone classifications.
6. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October
19, 1979, shall be the approved layout.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments con-
sidered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Four
. Traffic circulation and drives;
Lot layout;
Lot area;
Lot width and lot depth;
Type of use and its relation
the immediate vicinity;
to property and improvements in
. Past administrative action regarding this property.
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
USE PERMIT NO. 79-35
Applicant: Family Home Builders, Inc.
To permit the construction of a 18,832 sq. ft. office building
located at the northeast corner of Graziadio Drive and Beach
Boulevard.
This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 79-70.
Mr. Ray Miller was present to represent the application.
Chairman Crosby outlined the proposal to the Board. The
public hearing was opened.
Chairman Crosby expressed concern,as cited by the Traffic Engineer
over the two proposed driveways along Beach Boulevard. He
stated that the Traffic Engineer recommends that one of the two
drives be deleted due to possible traffic problems that may
occur. Secretary Spencer felt that if one of the two drives
were deleted, severe traffic congestion would result in the
proposed commercial center. He further stated that the proposal
was within substantial ordinance code conformance, i.e., sufficient
parking, landscaping, no activity problems between commercial
and residential (sufficient buffer proposed), and location of
trash receptacles.
Mr. Ott felt the need for "NO PARKING" signs and a red painted
curb along the north side and south side of Building "C".
Mr. Ray Miller addressed the Board and stated that he would like
to see the two driveways remain as proposed to facilitate the
center, especially the two fast food restaurants proposed.
There being no other parties present to speak on the application,
the public hearing was closed.
Further discussion ensued around the proposed two driveways along
Beach Boulevard. Secretary Spencer felt that the Traffic Engineer
should reevaluate the impacts on the proposed activity to possibly
find that two drives are needed along that portion of the property.
He further suggested a continuance to allow the applicant to meet
with the Traffic Engineer to discuss the driveway situation.
Applicant and Board concurred with the continuance.
1
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Five
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY OTT USE PERMIT NO. 79-35 WAS
CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 14, 1979, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 79-107
Applicant: Sam Sogoian
To permit the construction of a professional office building
located on the south side of Warner Avenue, approximately 292
feet east of Bolsa Chica Street.
This application is covered by Negative Declaration No. 79-72.
Mr. Sogoian was present to represent the application.
Secretary Spencer outlined the proposal to the Board. He stated
that the plan check revealed sufficient parking and landscaping,
however, a deficiency exists in the required turning radius from
25 feet shown and 27 feet required. Redesign of the proposal
was discussed and it was noted that a tentative parcel map
would have to be filed in order to eradicate an existing lot
line now in existance.
The applicant and the Board thought it best to continue the
application for one week to allow the applicant time to revise
his plans to meet turning radii requirements.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 79-107 WAS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 14, 1979 BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-51
Applicant: Ron Montgomery
To permit a two foot encroachment into the required five foot
main accessway located on the west side of Alabama Street, ap-
proximately 75 feet north of Atlanta Avenue.
IN CONJUNCTION WITH:
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Six
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-52
Applicant: Ron Montgomery
To permit a two foot encroachment into the required five foot
main accessway located on the west side of Alabama Street, ap-
proximately 100 feet north of Atlanta Avenue.
IN CONJUNCTION WITH:
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-53
Applicant: Ron Montgomery
To permit a two foot encroachment into the required five foot
main accessway located on the west side of Alabama Street, ap-
proximately 125 feet north of Atlanta Avenue.
IN CONJUNCTION WITH:
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-54
Applicant: Ron Montgomery
To permit a two foot encroachment into the required five foot
main accessway located on the west side of Alabama Street, ap-
proximately 150 feet north of Atlanta Avenue.
These applications are categorical exemptions, Class 5, California
Environmental Quality Act, 1970.
Secretary Spencer introduced the applications to the Board pointing
out that the applicant was requesting a -two foot encroachment into
the required five foot main accessway. He further pointed out that
the required side yard setback in that district is three feet, and
that the applicant meets that code requirement.
The public hearing was opened on Conditional Exception Nos. 79-51,
79-52, 79-53, and 79-54.
Mr. Jim Van Derhyden,representing the applicant, addressed the
Board and stated that the proposal would not be detrimental to
adjacent property owners in that he was requesting a variance only
from the required five foot main accessway requirement and not
a side yard reduction. He further stated that the property in
question did not have alley access and that the code had been
written for alley access to the rear rather than front garage
structures.
Mrs. Josephine Holly addressed the Board stating that she was
an adjoining property owner and objecting to the encroachment
because she felt a three foot side yard setback was too close.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Seven
Mr. Spencer explained to Mrs. Holly that the code allowed a
three foot side yard setback and that the applicant was requesting
an exception to the required five foot main accessway only.
There being no further parties present to speak on the application,
the public hearing was closed.
Board discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the Board that
a precedent has been established in that area for main accessway
encroachment and that the application should be granted.
Findings and conditions of approval were discussed.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY,CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 79-51 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS•
1. The code provisions contained in the "Old Town Specific Plan"
were designed primarily to apply to lots with alley access.
In the absence of such access on the subject property, applicant
cannot comply with the Code and provide front on garages. To
meet main accessway setback requirements and provide minimum width
for garage would be a dimensional impossibility.
2. Adequate access is provided into the dwelling units through
the front -on garages to permit moving of furniture, appliances,
etc.
3. Granting of this conditional exception will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or welfare of residents of neighboring
properties or injurious to improvements of property in the vicinity.
4. Granting of this conditional exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
5. Granting of this conditional exception does not constitute a
grant of special privilege from other properties in the vicinity
as other similar applications have been approved.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 23,
1979, shall be the approved layout.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Eight
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. The proposed unit shall be limited to one central source
of heating.
2. The garage door itself shall be a minimum of 16-1/2 feet
in width.
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ON
OND BY
NO. 79152 WASBY SPENCER APPROVEDNWITHCTHE FOLLOWING,CONDITIONAL
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,
NO
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
1. The code provisions contained in the "Old Town Specific Plan"
were designed primarily to apply to lots with alley access.
In the absence of such access on the subject property, applicant
cannot comply with the Code and provide front on garages. To
meet main accessway setback requirements and provide minimum
width for garage would be a dimensional impossibility.
2. Adequate access is provided into the dwelling units through
the front -on garages to permit moving of furniture, appliances,
etc.
3. Granting of this conditional exception will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or welfare of residents of neighboring
properties or injurious to improvements of property in the vicinity.
4. Granting of this conditional exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
5. Granting of this conditional exception does not constitute a
grant of special privilege from other properties in the vicinity
as other similar applications have been approved.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 23,
1979, shall be the approved layout.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Nine
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. The proposed unit shall be limited to one central source
of heating.
2. The garage door itself shall be a minimum of 16-1/2 feet
in width.
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 79-53 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS•
1. The code provisions contained in the "Old Town Specific Plan"
were designed primarily to apply to lots with alley access.
In the absence of such access on the subject property, applicant
cannot comply with the Code and provide front on garages. To
meet main accessway setback requirements and provide minimum
width for garage would be a dimensional impossibility.
2. Adequate access is provided into the dwelling units through
the front -on garages to permit moving of furniture, appliances,
etc.
3. Granting of this conditional exception will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or welfare of residents of neighboring
properties or injurious to improvements of property in the vicinity.
4. Granting of this conditional exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
5. Granting of this conditional exception does not constitute a
grant of special pr.ivile(le Er.om other properties in the vicinity
as other similar applications have been approvea.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual
plot
plan and
elevations received October 23,
1979, shall be
the
approved
layout.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Ten
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1.' The proposed unit shall be limited to one central source
of heating.
2. The garage door itself shall be a minimum of 16-1/2 feet
in width.
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: _None
ABSENT: None
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 79-54 WAS APPROVED WITH -THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS•
1. The code provisions contained in the "Old Town Specific Plan"
were designed primarily to apply -to lots with alley access.
In the absence of such access on the subject property, applicant
cannot comply with the Code and provide front on garages. To
meet main accessway setback requirements and provide minimum
width for garage would be.a dimensional impossibility.
2. Adequate access is provided into the dwelling units through
the front -on garages to permit moving -of furniture, appliances,
etc.
3. Granting of this conditional exception will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or welfare of residents of neighboring
properties or injurious to improvements of property in the vicinity.
4. Granting of this conditional exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of -Huntington Beach.
5. Granting of this conditional exception does not constitute a
grant of special privilege from other properties in the vicinity
as other similar applications have been approved.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received October 23,
1979, shall be the approved layout.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Eleven
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. The Proposed unit shall be limited to one central source
of heating.
2. The garage door itself shall be a minimum of 16-1/2 feet
in width.
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-55
Applicant: Kathleen Johnson
To permit a five foot encroachment into corner cutoff located
on the southwest corner of 21st Street and Pecan Avenue.
This application is a categorical exemption, Class 5, California
Environmental Quality Act, 1970.
Ms. Johnson was present to represent the application.
Secretary Spencer introduced the application to the Board.
The public hearing was opened.
Ms. Johnson outlined her proposal to the Board as requesting
an encroachment for a proposed house into the corner cut off.
There being no other parties present to speak on the application,
the public hearing was closed.
Secretary Spencer suggested a continuance of this application
to allow a Code Amendment No. 79-6 to be heard by the Planning
Commission on November 20, 1979. Board and applicant concurred
with a two week continuance.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 79-55 WAS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 21, 1979, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Crosby, Ott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, November 7, 1979
Page Twelve
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
4�arles P. Spe r, Secretary
Board of Zon' Adjustments
1