Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-04-01Approved April 15, 1980 F_� MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 1980 - 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: CONSENT CALENDAR: Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, - Civic Center California Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer None ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY SHEA THE CONSENT CALENDAR, CONSISTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 18, 1980, REGULAR MEETING AND AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 79-6, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 79-7, AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 79-01, WAS APPROVED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: Porter (arrived at meeting at 7:25) ABSTAIN: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Rogers, representing Harriett Wieder, addressed the Commission to announce the formation and first meeting of a Mobilehome Advis- ory Committee for the second supervisorial district. The first meeting of this committee will be held April 10, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors hearing room, 10 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 80-1 (Cont. from March 18, 1980) Applicant: Grace Lutheran Church To permit replacement of an existing church sign with a double- faced, freestanding redwood sign measuring 12 feet by 72 inches on property located on the north side of Edinger Avenue approxi- mately 150 feet west of'Goldenwest Street. The public hearing was reopened. Ron Burgher addressed the Commission in support of the proposed sign, and described its size -and location as requested. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 2 Paul Johnson, church pastor, also addressed the Commission to urge granting of the special sign permit. Larry Cote and William Osness, church members, spoke in favor of the sign as requested. There being no further persons to speak for or against the matter, the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed the proposal, including the lack of defin- ite standards in the code to cover situations of this kind. Chairman Bazil suggested that in the future such sign requests be brought to the Commission under the "unclassified uses" sections of the code, in order to provide more flexibility in criteria for such signs. Commissioner Bauer pointed out that, pursuant to legal counsel's dir- ections at the prior meeting, financial hardship was one of the prerequisites for granting of the special sign permit, and that none had been put forward by any proponent. Mr. Burgher thereupon testified that the church does depend upon membership contributions for a large part of its support and that failure of potential members to locate the church facility would result in substantial economic hardship. The siting of the sign upon the property was discussed, with the Com- mission consensus being that the 35 foot setback as shown provided a good location in terms of visibility and desirable visual effect from surrounding areas. ON MOTION BY SHEA AND SECOND BY GREER SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 80-1 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOL- LOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1.1 Strict compliance with Article 976 will result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant. 2.; The proposed sign would not adversely affect other signs in the area. 3."`'The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of such sign. 4. The proposed sign does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular Vision. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1.`', The maximum height of the subject sign shall be limited to six (6) feet and the maximum area of said sign shall be no larger than seventy-eight (78) square feet. -2- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 3 2. Subject sign shall be located totally within a landscaped area. 3. Subject sign shall be erected upon the property only in the location depicted upon the applicant's approved plot plan. AYES: Winchell, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea NOES: Kenefick, Bauer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-6 (Cont. from March 18, 1980) Applicant: Hunsaker & Associates, Inc. To permit construction of 66 condominium units on property located on the north side of Warner Avenue between Lynn and Sims Streets. Savoy Bellavia reminded the Commission that TT 10966 and Negative Declaration No. 80-15 for this project had been approved on March 18, 1980. The public hearing on the conditional use permit was reopened. Jim Maniscalo representing the developer, addressed the Com- mission to concur with the suggested conditions of approval and to offer his company's willingness to voluntarily include in the conditions, covenants, and restrictions on the development an agreement to maintain the landscaping within the public rights -of way along Warner Avenue and Lynn and Sims Streets. There being no other persons to address the proposal, the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECONDED BY SHEA TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-6 WITH THE FINDINGS AND 13 SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. In the following discussion legal counsel Jim Georges pointed out that the condition requiring offsite maintenance of landscap- ing is not legal; however, a voluntary agreement entered into between the City and the developer would be legal and enforceable. Extensive discussion took place regarding the imposition of condi- tions of approval for offsite improvements, following which Mr. Maniscalo repeated his assertion that Butler Housing, the developer of the proposed project, will voluntarily enter into a maintenance agreement whether or not it is imposed as a condition of approval and guaranteed that such an agreement will be honored. Commissioner Porter amended his motion to include approval of the Special Permit requested by the applicant and to delete sug- gested condition of approval 13 pertaining to the landscaping maintenance agreement; the amendment was concurred with by the original second, Commissioner Shea. -3- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 4 THE AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-6 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: pINDINGS - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. Through the use of heavy landscape planting around private and common areas and by maximizing the use of aesthetically leasing types of architecture, the proposed project will pro- mote a better living environment. 2. Through the use of landscape planting materials, aesthetically pleasing architecture, and special design and construction techniques, the surrounding uses will have a minimum impact on the proposed project and, in turn, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety, and con- venience of the neighborhood or the City in general. 3.. The orientation of many of the dwelling units onto common land- scaped areas and the design solution for a somewhat unique parcel of land will help to insure maximum privacy for the resi- dents within a project of this density. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 1. The proposed subdivision of this 2.79 gross acre parcel of land, zoned R3, Medium High Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 23.7 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use was designated and the R3 zoning designation was placed on subject property. 4'. The lot size, depth, frontage, street width, and through the use of a special permit all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be con- structed in compliance with standard plans and specifications :on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinances. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received and dated March 12, 1980, shall be the approved layout. The conceptual floor plans and conceptual elevations shall be approved in concept only and the applicant shall submit revised detailed plans to the Director of Develop- ment Services in order to assure compliance with all applicable provisions. -4- 4-1-80 - P.C. 1 Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 5 2. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the locations of clothes dryers. 3. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the location of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 4. Low -volume heads shall be used on all water spigots and water faucets. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 6. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking areas or lots in order to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas and for energy conserva- tion. 7. All structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of. submittal of an acoustical analysis report prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permits. 8. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth move- ment for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factor as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to issuance of building permits. 9. A chemical analysis, as well as physical properties of the soil on subject property, shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall contain a provision that will prohibit storage of boats, trailers, and recreation vehicles onsite, unless an area that is specifically designed for such storage and which is in compliance with the provisions of Article 936 is provided for the project. 11. Existing mature trees on the site shall be preserved if possible. A tree survey indicating the size, location, and species of all existing trees shall be submitted to the Depart- ment of Development Services prior to the issuance of building permits. All existing trees larger than six (6) inches in diameter which are removed shall be replaced with two (2) -5- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 6 24-inch box trees in addition to the standard landscaping re- quirement, or an equivalent approved by the Director of Devel- opment Services. 12. All structures shall be provided with fire sprinklers and a stand- pipe system designed in accordance with the National Fire Protection Agency standards and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The site plan shall indicate all potential accessways provided off of Warner Avenue. Building B shall be provided with exterior fire sprinklers along the north wall of the subject building and in the areas adjacent to the existing oil storage tanks. An eight (8) foot high block wall shall also be provided at this location, separating the proposed structure from the existing oil tanks. All fire prevention requirements shall be approved by the City's Fire Department. AYES: Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: Winchell ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Following conclusion of the hearing and approval of this request, staff was directed to obtain the signed agreement on landscaping maintenance within the 10-day appeal period for the project if possible. The Commission also requested that in future staff have a signed maintenance agreement, where applicable, in hand prior to bringing a project to the Commission. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-8/USE PERMIT NO. 79-22/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 79-572/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 79-3 Applicant: Signal Landmark, Inc. To permit the division of a 19.2 acre parcel of land into eleven (11) parcels to allow construction of a 190,000 square foot commercial complex on a potential archaeological site located on the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue. Savoy Bellavia reviewed the background of the request for the in- formation of the Commission. The public hearing on all the applications was opened. Bob_Wallbrook addressed the Commission to discuss the architectural style of the proposed project, the future development of the area below the bluff, the need for rodent control during construction, and the question of whether or not another commercial center was needed in the City. Armando Ruiz Newland House house and the lowland area, scaping betwe expressed concern about the future visibility of and the effect construction would have both on bluff. He also discussed the park proposed for and questioned how much room there will be for en the bluff and the center's buildings. -6- 4-1-80 - P.C. the the the land- Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 7 Gene Hammill pointed out that the Newland House is the only museum within the City and should be the focal point of any dev- elopment. He expressed the opinion that the entire bluff area should be a park and asked that the leases should be reviewed before any action is taken on the subject requests. Tom Coffey concurred that as much land as possible should be dedicated to park purposes because of the unique terrain of the area. Mr. Coffey's chief concern was the treatment of the rear of the project because of its potential for visual impact upon the residential properties below to the east. Charlene Bauer, member of the Newland House Board of Trustees, informed the Commission that the Board had worked with Signal to try to work out the plan for the center; it was, in fact, at their suggestion that the two-story office building had been placed back toward the bluff and down the slope so that it would not block the view of the ocean from the Newland House porch and tower. Ms. Bauer also discussed the park plan and the archaeological conditions on both sites. Virginia Whipple said that the Newland House is of county -wide significance and the dignity of its location should be maintained. Bob McNatt, representing the developer, addressed the Commission in support of the project. He noted that his firm has designed the center with the Newland House in mind and has tried to present a compatible design. In response to a question from Commissioner Bauer, he informed the Commission that Signal Land- mark has a long-term lease on the property which will revert to ownership in Signal's name in 1999. The Newland House site was dedicated to the City as part of the company's park dedication on another tract. He explained the disparity in the treatment of the sites by the archaeologist by saying that apparently the most intense finds had been made close by the Newland House and lessened in significance with distance from the house, making the center site subject to less stringent requirements than those necessary for the Newland House property. The public hearing was closed. Chairman Bazil directed that the first item taken up by the Commission would be review and possible certification of the EIR for the project. Extensive discussion took place on the environmental impact report, with the consensus emerging that further information was needed before it could be certified. A motion was made by Commissioner Bauer that the environmental impact report be denied until the archaeological problems in the area were resolved. Motion failed for lack of a second. -7- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 8 A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHEA AND SECONDED BY GREER THAT EIR NO. 79-3 BE APPROVED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION AS REQUESTED BY THE COMMISSION WITHIN 30 DAYS. Further discussion took place on timing and procedure, and both the maker of the motion and the second withdrew the motion. ON MOTION BY SHEA AND SECOND BY GREER EIR NO. 79-3 WAS CONTINUED TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 6, 1980, TO PERMIT SUBMITTAL OF FURTHER INFORMATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY WINCHELL ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO:•'80-81 USE PERMIT NO. 79-22, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 79-572 WERE CONTINUED TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 6, 1980, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Following the continuation of the applications, each Commissioner was requested to submit the concerns which must be addressed in both the environmental impact report and in the treatment of the actual project plan itself. The EIR is to contain the following: Concise information on the arch- aeology information, including a definition of the archaeological requirements and restraints on the Newland House property itself as it relates to the shopping center site; rodent control is to be addressed; appearance of the bluffline with the long building as it will be seen from the valley below; and a soils report addressing possible peat deposits as well as bluff stability, possible slippage, and setbacks from the edge of the bluff. Items relating solely to the project plan are to be addressed as follows: 1) Written statements on the conditions of the leasehold and future titles to the property; 2) Establishment of the Newland House as the focal point of the project, with architectural consis- tency; 3) Information from the Community Services Commission on its future plans for Bartlett'Park below the bluff; 4) Protection of the vista from the Newland House; 5) Information on future signing which will be proposed; and 6) Cross sections showing proposed grading. It was also asked that the proponent consider reorientation of the site to the Newland House and that, whether or not the project is redesigned, the application contain information on drive widths, renderings to show appearance from three sides, joint use of parking, Ll n J -8- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 9 information on circulation, inclusion of the landscaping plan into the conditions of approval, participation in median open- ing and signalization of Beach and Utica, and an indication of what landscaping will take place at the top of the bluff. A recess was called at 9:50 p.m.; the Commission reconvened at 10:05. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 80-18 Applicant: Kacor Realty, Inc. To permit rezoning of 8.28 acres from M1-A (Restricted Manufac- turing) to Ml-A-10,000 (Restricted Manufacturing with a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet) on property located on the east side of Graham Street approximately 175 feet south of Bolsa Avenue. Savoy Bellavia explained that the applicant is only requesting that the lot area be reduced from the code -required 20,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet and that the properties for which this reduction is being requested are not located directly adjacent to Bolsa Chica. The public hearing was opened. Ken Kelly, representing Kacor, addressed the Commission in support of the request. There were no other persons present to address the proposal, and the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed the request. Legal counsel Jim Georges noted that the request is really not a zone change but simply a request to amend the district map to show the reduced lot re- quirement. ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY SHEA NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 80-18 WAS ADOPTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY PORTER THE AMENDMENT TO THE DISTRICT MAPS WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding land uses. AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None -9- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-7/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 79-586 Applicant: The Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange To permit the construction of a multi -purpose facility and related site improvements on property located on the north side of Talbert Avenue approximately 660 feet west of Newland Street. Savoy Bellavia outlined recent Commission} action on this property in changing the zone from SP-1 to "Q"RA. The public hearing was opened. David Lorenzini, architect, addressed the Commission to request clarification and possible modification to the suggested conditions of,.approval. He questioned the reason for the right -turn only on the easterly drive, asked for criteria on future signing, and indicated that he will commit to the submitted master plan for the location of the final phase (church construction) if it is approved. On the tentative parcel map, Mr. Lorenzini requested permission to carry the undergrounding of utilities only to the existing transformer on the property, rather than completely across the site. There being no other persons to address the Commission, the public hearing was closed. The Commission reviewed the conceptual master plan and considered the intent behind the code requirement for undergrounding utilities. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHEA AND SECONDED BY KENEFICK TO APPROVE CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-7 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. Further discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL AND SECONDED BY KENEFICK TO AMEND THE PRIOR MOTION TO INCLUDE CONDITIONS REQUIRING SIGN REVIEW AND FUTURE REVIEW OF THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE CHURCH WHEN IT IS PROPOSED TO BE BUILT. THE MOTION FOR AMENDMENT CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: Porter ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None THE AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-7 CARRIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed master plan is in substantial conformance with the -Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. -10- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 11 2. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. The proposed parking is adequate to accommodate the use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan dated March 27, 1980 and the floor plan and elevations dated March 20, 1980 shall be the approved layout; however, the elevations for the future church construction shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to issuance J of permits for such structure. The main drive on the site plan shall be modified to conform with fire access standards. 2. Offsite improvements along Talbert Avenue shall be provided in accordance with Department of Public Works standards. 3. The most easterly driveway shall be designed for right turns only. 4. Master plan drainage facilities shall be provided in accord- ance with Department of Public Works standards. 5. Landscaping shall conform with Article 979 of the ordinance code. The future site of the church shall be planted with turf until developed with the church structure. 6. If lighting is included in the parking lot, energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g., high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties. 7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 8. Facilities proposed for future development which do not sub- stantially conform with the approved master plan shall be subject to the approval of a separate conditional use permit. 9. Any signing proposed for the project shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to installation. 10. The Planning Commission reserves the right to rescind this conditional use permit approval in the event of any violation of the terms of this approval or violation of the applicable zoning laws. Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing, and shall be based upon specific findings. AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:None -11- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 12 ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY SHEA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 79-586 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design and improvement features of the subdivision are in conformance with City standards as well as with the State Map Act and supplemental City subdivision ordinances. 2. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time of the land use designation on the property. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The tentative parcel map dated March 20, 1980, shall be the approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. Copies of the recorded parcel map shall be submitted to the De- partments of Public Works and Development Services. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach water system. 4. All utilities shall be installed underground up to the trans- former on the site at the time the property is developed. At the time the adjacent property to the north is developed and the utilities thereon required to be underground, the remaining por- tion of the utilities on subject property shall also be under - grounded. AYES: Winchell, Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Greer, Shea, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CODE AMENDMENT NO. 80-1 Initiated by the Department of Development Services A proposed amendment to Articles 931 and 936 to include conversions of existing apartments to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. Savoy Bellavia explained to the Commission that this interim ordinance change is intended to control any conversions of existing apartment - units to private ownership during the time between the expiration of the City Council -imposed moratorium and the enactment of a permanent conversion ordinance. The code amendment is designed to require all such conversions to comply with.present planned development codes. -12- 4-1-80 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 1, 1980 Page 13 The public hearing was opened; no persons were present to address the proposal, and the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed the intent of the amendment. Legal counsel Jim Georges corrected a typographical error in the title of the amendment. ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY PORTER CODE AMENDMENT NO. 80-1 WAS APPROVED AS PRESENTED BY STAFF FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Kenefick,Porter, Bazil, Greer NOES: Shea, Bauer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION ITEMS: In response to staff's request for clarification of a prior Commission direction for the preparation of a resource produc- tion overlay (in connection with the Commission's review of Area of Concern 2.1 on the Land Use Element Amendment to the General Plan), the Commission discussed the intent of the original direction. It was the consensus of the Commission that this item be scheduled for the next Commission study session. June Catalano presented the report on the Coastal Energy Impact Program and commended her staff, Mike Multari and Jeanine Frank, who were responsible for its preparation. Commissioner -Shea left the meeting at 11:00 p.m. Ms. Catalano reported that the staff is pursuing further State funding for follow up work to the Energy Report, and will keep the Commission apprised of their progress on such grant. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS: Commissioner Greer discussed the conversion to condominiums of the Villa Pacifica to ascertain if it had been done in conform- ance with State and City laws. He was informed by legal counsel that the applications had been filed with the State in time to comply with State statutes in effect at the time, and no City law was applicable. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M. ri v FAO--; 2 M� �;,. IN P arles P. Spen r, Acting Secretary -13" 4-1-80 - P.C.