Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-07-09MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-8 - Civic 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, WEDNESDAY, JULY 9, 1980 - 1:15 PM BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly Center California MINUTES: The consideration of the minutes of June 18 and June 25, 198as deferred to the meeting of July 16, 1980. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-24/ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-2 Applicant: Harold V. Bragg (Reconsideration) To reconsider previously imposed conditions of approval on a request to permit a zero rear and sideyard setback in lieu of the code - required 10 foot setback and a building height of 27 feet in lieu of the code -permitted 20 feet for a two-story office/professional building located on the north side of Aldrich Avenue approximately 175 feet west of Beach Boulevard. Secretary Lipps informed the Board that the applicant is request- ing -relief from the prior recommendation that the building be reversed on the lot in order to prevent visual intrusion upon the existing preschool located to the east of the subject site and to permit continued light for that existing use. The request was scheduled for this meeting to allow time to notify the adjacent property owners. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Didion Camilari, owner of the preschool, addressed the Board to object to the change in the setback, citing problems which would occur during construction of the project at zero setback on the school's property line such as noise and hazards to the children from the building; he also indicated that he felt the original approval would best safeguard his school's continued light, air, and aesthetic quality. There being no other persons to address the Board, the public hearing was closed. Board review included consideration of the compatibility of the school and the office/professional building as opposed to the compatibility of the office use and the bank to the west; the Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 2 fact that a retail use could have been constructed at zero setback with no requirement for a variance; and possible landscaping of the wall which could improve the visual impact on the preschool site. It was the consensus of the Board that the project could be construc- ted at zero setback on the property line abutting the preschool without seriously impacting that use and could, in fact, result in less impact in the future on that school by not having the office use front directly onto the school property. Bruce Crosby discussed the need for a maintenance easement for the wall at zero property line. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-24 AND -ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-2 WERE REVISED AS FOLLOWS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-24 (Revised) FINDINGS: Remain the same as those originally found in the June 18, 1980, approval. REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received and dated January 15, 1980, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; . Parking layout; . Lot area; .,Lot width and lot depth; .-Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equip- ment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. -2- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 3 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-2 (Revised) REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received and dated January 15, 1980, shall be the approved layout, sub- ject to the modifications described herein: a. Applicant shall submit revised plans reflecting the size and location of driveway approaches, particularly on Aldrich Street, prior to issuance of building permits. A plan delineating said modification shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the modification outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. b. The building wall along the easterly property line shall be of maintenance -free masonry construction, or the applicant shall obtain an irrevocable maintenance easement from the adjacent property owner and submit evidence of such easement at the time of application for building permits. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; • Parking layout; • Lot area; • Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; • Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and land- scaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material pro- posed to screen said equipment. B. GENERAL CONDITION: 1. Applicant shall adhere to all onsite parking requirements as stated in Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordin- ance Code. -3- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 4 AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None 0 The applicant and public were informed of the appeal period. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 80-555 (Continued from 6-25-80) Applicant: Bijan Sassounian To permit the creation of nine (9) parcels and revision of the con- figuration of existing shopping center parcels to include Beach Boule- vard frontage road and create a separate parcel for the area designated as R2 on the General Plan for property located on the east side of Beach Boulevard at the southeast corner of Beach and Atlanta Avenue. This request is a categorical exemption, Class 5, California Environ- mental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Lipps informed the Board that the applicant is bringing in a site plan for the property and it would therefore be advisable to continue the parcel map until after review of that layout. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 80-555 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JULY 16, 1980, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-24 (Continued from 7-2-80) Applicant: Conroy Properties, Inc. To permit the construction of a 5,500 square foot industrial building on property located on the east side of Surveyor Circle approximately 470 feet east of Newland Street. This request is covered by previously assessed Negative Declaration No. 79-69. Secretary Lipps reported that a request has been received for with- drawal of this application. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY CROSBY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-24 WAS WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None -4- 7-9-80 - BZA 1 Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 5 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-15 (Continued from 7-2-80) Applicant: T. D. Skelton To permit a projecting deck to encroach into the required side yard setback on property located on 16352 Maruffa Circle. This request is a categorical exemption, Class 5, California En- vironmental Quality Act, 1970. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Skelton was present at the meeting and submitted a more det- ailed site layout for the Board's review. He stated that he is extending his deck to replace a concrete deck which was removed and that the existing pool and the wharfage line present engin- eering problems on the site. There was no other person present to speak for or against the proposal, and the public hearing was closed. The Board reviewed the size and shape of the lot and the degree of encroachment. Secretary Lipps pointed out that according to the City's plan check engineer the deck can be located on the site without the encroachment, although this alternative would be pro- hibitively expensive. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY KELLY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-15 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the same vicinity and under the same zone classification. 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, location, or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under the same zone classifications. 3. The granting of the conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. REASONS: 1. The relationship of the lot line on this particular property and the wharfage line makes it extremely difficult to engineer the proposed structure within code restrictions. -5- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 6 2. The triangular configuration of the property is found to present a hardship in siting the proposed structure on the lot, as the structure could be erected without a need for a variance on the other rectangular shaped lots in the same subdivision. 3. The existing pool on the site presents another constraint in loc- ating the proposed deck structure totally within the required setback. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual plot plan received and dated March 25, 1980, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues in relation to the conceptual plan: • Lot area; • Lot width and lot depth; • Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; • Past administrative action regarding this property. AYES: Crosby, Kelly NOES: Lipps ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-26 Applicant: Jerry Galich To permit the construction of an automotive repair shop located on the northwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Crystal Street. This request is a categorical exemption, Class 5, California Environ- mental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Galich was present at the hearing. The Board discussed the future alignment of Crystal Street and its possible effect on the subject property. Ms. Galich stated that she had proceeded with her plans on the assump- tion that Crystal was precise planned as an 80 foot street, that the future centerline would be moved easterly 20 feet, and that all required dedication would come from the easterly side of the street with property owners compensated by the abandonment of the railroad right-of-way. This alignment and dedication would have no effect, therefore, on her proposal. She further noted that prior dedication of 22 feet for the widening of Garfield Avenue had been made, and that any future dedica- tion for Crystal would render her property unbuildable. -6- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 7 Secretary Lipps informed the Board that the plan is in compliance with code requirements except for a limited amount of space available for parking. He noted, however, that there are interior parking bays in which it may be assumed that a number of the patrons of the business will leave their cars. Wall height and location of trash areas, as well as driveways, will be constructed to City specifications. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-26 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOL- LOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual site plan and elevations received and dated June 16, 1980, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and land- scaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material pro- posed to screen said equipment. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. All drive approaches shall be constructed with radius type curb return and all drive approaches and drive widths shall be installed in conformance to Department of Public Works standards for commercial and industrial driveways. These drives shall be submitted for the approval of the Department of Public Works. -7- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 8 2. In the event that the approved site plan does not conform to the adopted Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-1, this approval shall be null and void. AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 80-23 Applicant: Ron Montgomery To permit the construction of a single-family residence on the west side of 15th Street (11 15th Street). This request is a categorical exemption, Class 3, California Environ- mental Quality Act, 1970. No one was present to represent this application. The public hearing was opened and closed. The Board reviewed the plan, finding that it complied with code pro- visions. Secretary Lipps noted that a call has been received in the Department regarding the property at 1506 Pacific Coast Highway. The caller was concerned about the impacts which may be generated later by commercial development on this site adjacent to the proposed residence, he wished to make no complaint about the subject application but merely to make sure that the applicant was aware of the potential problem. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY USE PERMIT NO. 80-23 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or work- ing in the vicinity or injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use. 2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual site plan and elevations received and dated June 16, 1980, shall be the approved layout. -8- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 9 In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues in relation to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; . Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter of understanding with the Department of Development Services; this letter shall confirm that the subject building is to be constructed, occupied, and permanently maintained as a single-family dwelling. AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-28/ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-25 Applicant: Saffell & McAdam Inc., Builders To permit construction of a 10,385 square foot office and ware- house facility to encroach 13 feet 3 inches into the required side yard setback on property located on the west side of Transistor Lane at the corner of Transistor and Engineer Drive. This project was assessed under the master environmental impact report (EIR 73-16) prepared for the Lusk Industrial Park. Jim Lefler was present to represent the applicants. The public hearing on the conditional exception was opened. The applicant addressed the Board to explain the operation of the proposed use, which will be the transportation of gasoline only, with no storage of loaded trucks on the property. The fuel tanks shown on the plan are for the fueling of trucks only. There being no other persons to address the Board, the public hearing was closed. Walt Lipps discussed the intent of the code provisions for zero setback on one property line with a compensating 30-foot setback on the other, which was primarily for application on interior lots. He noted that in other respects the application meets code re- quirements except for small details which can be caught in plan check. Bruce Crosby pointed out that the width of the utility easement seems to be incorrectly depicted on the plan; if so, the required setback from that easement may also be inadequate. -9- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 198a Page 10 ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-28 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-25 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-28 FINDINGS: 1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. 3. The granting of the conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. REASONS: 1. It was determined that the intent of the code section from which the applicant is requesting relief was intended to regulate the setbacks on interior lots, and the subject property is an exterior lot in the industrial district. 2. The ratio of the width of the lot to its depth places a constraint on the development of the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan received and dated June 24, 1980, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues in relation to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; Parking layout; Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the im- mediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. -10- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 11 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-25 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual site plan and elevations received and dated June 24, 1980, shall be the approved layout, sub- ject to the following requirements: a. Drive widths and locations shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. b. If it is determined that a Use Permit is required for the overhead truck door shown on the plan, the appli- cant shall file for such permit or delete the door from the plans. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues in relation to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; . Parking layout; . Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; • Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and land- scaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechani- cal equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 3. A tentative parcel map to consolidate the subject parcels into one parcel shall be filed and approved prior to issu- ance of building permits, and said parcel map shall be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder prior to occupancy of the building. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Plans for the proposed tanks on the property shall be sub- mitted to the Huntington Beach Fire Department for approval. AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSEP:T: None -11- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes., H_. B.. Hoard of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 12 MISCELLANEOUS AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 79-25 Applicant: Maguire Partnership Proposal for a parking lot on Anderson Street and Pacific Coast Highway. Walt Lipps informed the Board that this will be an informal review of the proposed 104 space parking lot designed to mitigate the parking problems being experienced by Peter's Landing. John Cope, representing the developer, explained his proposal, point- ing out that there is an approved application for an office building on this site, and this temporary parking lot is primarily intended to be used as valet parking for the Rueben's restaurant in order to take the burden off the Peter's Landing parking lot and free it up for patrons of other uses in the project. It is intended to install the required 6-inch curb face and landscaping on Pacific Coast Highway at this time in order to tie the lot into the existing shopping center. All drives on Pacific Coast Highway have been eliminated. A landscap- ing plan will be submitted, as well as a tentative parcel map to con- solidate the three parcels involved in the lot into one parcel. Mr. Cope noted that about 10 spaces will be lost from the lot when the ultimate building goes in; however, it is planned to provide "tuck - under" parking in replacement and as many of the temporary spaces as possible will be retained. Bruce Crosby indicated that if the proposed storm drain is a public drain a permit will be required, and Mr. Cope agreed to pull all nec- essary permits. Walt Lipps said his only question would be if the zoning in the area allowed for installation of the lot, and discussion took place on whether the proposed temporary parking could be considered a comple- mentary use to the approved plans. Mr. Lipps will meet with the Assistant Director, Pat Spencer, and if it is determined that this use is an integral part of the shopping center and is part of the parking layout for that center the applicant will be so notified as quickly as possible. SIGN REQUEST: Request for deviation in colors of sign from the approved sign pro- gram for a commercial shopping center located on the west side of Beach Boulevard north of Adams Avenue. The Board reviewed the request and noted that the variation was not a result of any need to conform with a national logo, as had been the case in a previous permitted sign. It was the consensus of the Board not to establish a precedent by granting the request, and the deviation in sign colors was denied.- -12- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 13 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-28 Applicant: The OK Earl Corporation To permit a one-story, 2,160 square foot building to house a savings and loan use at the southeast corner of Main and Fifth Streets. Secretary Lipps pointed out that this plan is identical with a previously approved request which has expired due to the delay in processing the applicant's request before the Coastal Commis- sion. The plan check has been done and the plan is precisely the same as the one formerly approved, AR 78-54. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-28 WAS APPROVED WITH TIE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual site plan and elevations received and dated June 30, 1980, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: The plan shall reflect the required two and one-half (2-1/2) foot alley dedication. The modification depicted above shall be delineated on the plan submitted to the Building Division upon application for build- ing permits. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues in relation to the conceptual plan: . Traffic circulation and drives; . Parking layout; Lot area; . Lot width and lot depth; . Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; . Past administrative action regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for approval: a. A landscaping plan designed so that the portion of the property at the corner of 5th and Main will be planted to inhibit and discourage its use by pedestrians. NOTE: The Board has recognized and considered the fact that in two areas the property does not meet strict inter- pretation of the code requirements. It was the Board's -13- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.S. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 14 determination that this constitutes a very minor encroach- ment not significant enough to require a variance and, further, that the intensified landscaping proposed for the site consti- tutes sufficient replacement for the small loss in square footage. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan, if applicable. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. B. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION: 1. The egress drive on Main Street shall be posted "Right Turn Only." C. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 2. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 3. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 4. If outside lighting is included on the site energy efficient lamps (e.g., sodium vapor, metal halide) shall be used. Lighting shall be installed in such a manner that "spillage" onto adjacent property does not occur. AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None SPECIAL EVENT NO. 80-20 Applicant: Film'Ad Corporation (for Safeway Stores) To permit flags, pennants, and banners to publicize a grand opening event at a market at 9062 Adams Avenue. No one was present to represent the application. The request was re- viewed by the Board. ON MOTION BY KELLY AND SECOND BY CROSBY SPECIAL EVENT NO. 80-20 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The layout and project description received and dated June 27, 1980, shall be the approved project. -14- 7-9-80 - BZA Minutes, H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 9, 1980 Page 15 2. This approval shall be valid for a three (3) day period of time starting on July 11, 1980. AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-23/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-22 Reconsideration Secretary Lipps informed the Board that these two applications, which had been referred to the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 1980, had not been placed on that agenda because of a difficulty in timing on the advertising. ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY THE BOARD DETERMINED TO RECONSIDER THE ABOVE APPLICATIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 80-23 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 80-22 WERE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 5, 1980, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Crosby, Lipps, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: None There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ()em Ll�w� Walt Lipps, Secr tary Pro Tem :df -15- 7-9-80 - BZA