HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-05-20MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Room B-8, Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA.
WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 1981 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper (Kelly arrived at
1:30 to replace Fire Representative Cooper)
MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY TINDALL, THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 29, 1981 WERE APPROVED
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY TINDALL, THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 6, 1981 WERE APPROVED
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COOPER, THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 13, 1981 WERE DEFERRED
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
l
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 81-25
Applicant: Ye Dock Master, Inc.
To permit the construction of a 20,091 sq. ft. industrial building
located on the east side of Metzler Lane, approx. 500 feet south
of Slater Avenue:
This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 81-27.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 2
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY KELLY, THE BOARD HAVING FOUND
THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 81-27,
WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES CONTAINED IN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.
81-25 GENERAL CONDITIONS #5 THRU #8, IMPOSED ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW APPLICATION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES:
Tindall,
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
None
Kelly, Spencer
Chairman -Tindall introduced the application to the Board. Mr. Ken
Thompson was present to represent the application.
Secretary -Spencer briefly outlined the proposal, noting that parking
ratios in regard to the amount of warehouse/storage space and office
area did not meet code requirements. He stated that the.,plan was
deficient by approximately eight spaces (8). He recommended that
the applicant make some revisions in the areas allocated for office/
warehousing.
Chairman Tindall informed the applicant that drive approaches would
have to meet the Department of Public Works standards regarding
drive approach widths. Also, that,street,)improvements must be
completed prior to occupancy of the facility.
ii
Secretary Spencer stated that a Tentative Parcel Map had been approved
for this particular site (TPM 79-573). He recommended that a copy
of recordation be submitted to the Department of Development Services.
Further discussion followed. Conditions of Approval were discussed
with the applicant.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY KELLY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.
81-25 WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD, WITH'CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS
NOTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceputal plot plan and elevations received April
21, 1981 shall be the approved layout, subject to the
modifications described herein:
a. Site plan shall comply with provisions of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code regarding parking
ratios and landscaping requirements.
A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to
the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the
modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be
approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 3
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered
the following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot depth and lot width;
- Type of use and its relation to property and
improvements in the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the Board:
a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article
979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and land-
scaping specifications on file in the Department of
Public Works.
b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said
plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical
equipment and shall delineate the type of material
proposed to screen said equipment.
c. A plan reflecting revised parking layout shall be
submitted to the Secretary of the Board, prior to
issuance of building permits.
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. Drive approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27)
feet in width per Department of Public Works Standard Plan
212 A & B.
2. Applicant shall meet all applicable local, state and federal
fire codes, ordinances and standards.
3. Proof of recordation of Tentative Parcel Map No. 79-573 shall
be submitted to the Department of Development Services.
4. Dedication and Street improvements shall be completed per
Department of Public Works standards, prior to issuance of
occupancy permits.
5. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe and
other surplus or unusable material shall be disposed of at
an offsite facility equipped to handle them.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 4
6. If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation
area, energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressur
sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be
directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties.
7. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered
soils engineer. This analysis shall include on -site sampling
and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recom-
mendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties,
--_foundations,-retaining.walls and streets and utilities.
8. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type
shall:be-installed-as approved by the -Building Department.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Kelly
NOES- None
ABSENT:- None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION_NO. 81-33
Applicant: Ron Hix
To permit an. encroachment of fifteen (15) feet into required sight
angle, located on the north side of Warner Avenue, approximately
235 feet west of Beach Boulevard.
This request is --a Categorical_ Exemption Class 5, (California Environ-
mental Quality Act, 1970.
IN CONJUNCTION -WITH:
USE PERMIT N0. 81-24
Applicant: Ron Hix
To permit thee -construction of a 7,412 sq. ft. commercial/office
building, located -,on --the north side of Warner, approximately 235
feet west of Beach Boulevard (7923 Warner).
This -request -was previously assessed under Negative Declaration
No. 7-9-14. -
Secretary Spencer introduced the application to the Board. He
briefly_explained that the approval of sight angle encroachments
are -usually -_to__. -protect the exposure of adjacent properties.
He stated that no correspondence had been received from the surrounding
property_ owners in relation to this proposal (immediate adjacent
property uses consist of'a car wash and a retail business).
MINU^'ES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 5
He further noted that there are not sight angle requirements in the
C-4 zone, however, because the proposed building will have a C-2
-use as well as C-4 uses, a conditional exception is necessary.
Chairman Tindall opened the public hearing. Mr. Ron Hix was present
to represent the application.
Chairman Tindall expressed concern regarding the westerly drive
approach. He stated that a common drive approach would be necessary,
in order to avoid traffic hazards on Warner Avenue He further stated
that two separate drives would not be acceptable, as it would create
confusion for drivers coming off of Warner.
Chairman Tindall stated that if the applicant could not get approval
for the common drive on Warner, he would recommend that the building
be "flip-flopped" to take access from the east.
It was recommended that the applicant meet with the adjacent property
owner (retail business) for agreement of a common drive approach.
The Board recommended continuing Use Permit No. 81-24 for one week.
Chairman Tindall closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY KELLY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 81-33 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING REASONS, FINDINGS AND
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
REASON FOR APPROVAL:
Due to placement of existing building on adjacent lots, encroachment
into required site angle was determined not to adversely impact those
adjacent properties.
FINDINGS:
1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute
a grant of a special privilege inconsistent upon other properties
in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance
is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed
by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classifications.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 6
3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order
-to preserve the.enjoyment of one or more substantial property
:rights.
4. The.granting_of a conditional exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in
the -same zone classifications. -
5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received April 24,
1981 shall be the approvel layout.
In its approval -action, the.Board-of Zoning Adjustments considered
the
following issues.relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;-
- Lot area; .� _ . - -
- Lot width and lot, -depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property and
improvements in the -immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
AYES:- Spencer, Tindall_, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ON MOTION BY SPENCER -AND SECOND BY T-INDALL, USE PERMIT NO. 81-24
WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK TO MAY 27, 1981 IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT
TO CONSULT WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY- OWNERS.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None,- .
USE PERMIT NO.~81-21
Applicant: Thomas. Chow
To permit the construction of a seven (7) unit apartment building
abutting an arterial highway, located at the intersection of Sandra
Lee and Warner Avenue.
This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 81-22.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 7
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY KELLY, THE BOARD HAVING FOUND THAT
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 81-22
WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES CONTAINED IN USE PERMIT NO. 81-21
GENERAL CONDITIONS #4 THRU #9, IMPOSED ON THE USE PERMIT APPLICATION
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Chairman Tindall introduced the application to the Board. Secretary
Spencer briefly outlined the proposal.
Chairman Tindall opened the public hearing. Mr. Chow was present
to represent the application.
Chairman Tindall expressed concern regarding the proposed security
gate, particulary access to the property. Mr. Chow stated that the
gate would be a key type security gate.
Chairman Tindall recommended that the Board review the type of
gate prior to occupancy of the building. He also expressed concern
regarding grades of the drive out to'.1the public right-of-way.
He noted a grade differential of approximately 1 1/3 ft, between
the drive and the public right-of-way. He expressed his concern
regarding the visability which maybe obstructed.
Conditions of Approval were discussed with the applicant. The
applicant was informed that all drive approaches would be required
to be twenty-seven (27) feet in width. Also, that all public
improvements shall be completed and dedicated prior to occupancy.
Chairman Tindall closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION BY TINDALL AND SECOND BY SPENCER, USE PERMIT NO. 81-21
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AS NOTED HEREIN:
FINDINGS:
1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will
not be detrimental to;
a. The general welfare of persons residing or working
in the vicinity;
b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use
or building.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 8
2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect -the
General Plan of -the City of Huntington Beach.
3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan
of Land Use.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A.- TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The revised conceptual plot plan and elevations received
May 18, 1981 shall be the approved layout, subject to the
modifications described herein:
a. A plan --reflecting the proposed security gate shall
be submitted for review and approval by the Board
of Zoning Adjustments.
A plan delineating said modification shall be submitted to
the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the
modification outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved
and made a permanent part of the administrative file.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered
the following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property
and improvements in the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
2.- The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the Board:
a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article
979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and
landscaping specifications on file in the Department
of Public Works.
b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said
plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical
equipment and shall delineate the type of material
proposed to screen said equipment.
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. Dedication and public improvements shall be completed prior
to issuance of occupancy permits.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 9
2. Drive approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27)
feet in width per Department of Public Works standards.
3. Applicant shall meet all applicable local, state and federal
fire codes, ordinances and standards.
4. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the
location of clothes dryers.
5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking
facilities, water heaters, and central heating units.
6. Low volume heads shall be used on all showers.
7. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or
detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the state
acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the
60 CNEL contours of the property. The interior noise levels
of all dwelling units shall not exceed the California insulation
standards of 45 bda CNEL. Evidence of compliance shall consist
of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under
the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical
engineering, with the application for building permits. All
measurers recommended to mitigate noise to acceptable levels
shall be incorporated into the design of the project.
8. If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation
area, energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure
sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be
directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties.
9. A detaile soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils
engineer. This analysis shall include on -site sampling and
laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations
regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations,
retaining walls, streets and utilities.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 81-563
Applicant: M. Petyo & Associates, Inc.
To permit the consolidation of two (2) lots into one (1) lot, located
on the east side of Huntington Avenue, at the end of cul-de-sac of
Commodore Circle (7631 Commodore Circle- Lots A and 10 of Tract 4026).
The applicant ackowledged receipt of suggested Conditions of Approval.
Chairman Tindall introduced the application to the Board. Secretary
Spencer briefly explained the proposal, noting that the consolidation
of the lots would eliminate one lot designated as recreational.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 10
Vehicle acccess was discussed. Secretary Spencer noted that
access would be taken from the alley, which would necessitate
modification of the structures (building and garages) on lot 10.
The applicant spoke stating that two (2) essential parking spaces
would be eliminated if a modification to the buildings were required.
Further discussion ensued. Conditions of Approval were discussed
with the applicant.
ON MOTION BY TINDALL AND SECOND BY SPENCER, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 81-563 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, AND CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL, BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed consolidation of lots for the purposes of multiple
type dwelling units is in compliance with the size and shape of
property necessary for that type of development.
2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land
use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of
this land use.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land
use at the time the land use designation for multiple dwelling
units was placed on the subject property.
4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and
improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed
to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications
on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map
Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinances.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCELS FOR
ANY PURPOSE:
1. The tentative parcel map received by the Department of
Development Services on May 7, 1981 shall be the approved
layout.
2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the
Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange
County Recorder.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 11
3. Vehicular access rights to Huntington Street and Commodore
Circle shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach.
4. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with
the Department of Development Services.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-32
Applicant: James Maddux
To permit a reduction in minimum open space dimension from twenty-
five (25) feet to twenty (20) feet, located at 8402 Millbridge
Circle.
This request is a Categorical Exemption Class 15, California Environ-
mental Quality Act, 1970.
Mr. Maddux was present to represent the application. Chairman Tindall
opened the public hearing. Secretary Spencer briefly outlined the
application, noting that lot size is larger than standard, and remaining
open space would exceed Ordinance Code requirements.
Chairman Tindall opened the public hearing. Mr. Maddux stated that
several homes in the area had added on, in fact, immediate neighbor
has the same type of addition. The addition would not go beyond
the existing structure.
Secretary Spencer stated that the plan fits well with the existing
home, and will meet existing code requirements regarding open space
dimensions. Also, will supply adequate recreational area.
Chairman Tinall closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY KELLY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.
81-32 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, REASONS AND CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
REASON FOR APPROVAL:
As the remaining yard area will exceed minimum open space, the five
(5) foot reduction in one dimension was determined to be minimal and
would cause no adverse impact to adjacent properties.
FINDINGS:
1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute
a grant of a special privilege inconsistent upon other properties
in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications.
MINUTEST H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 12
2. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order
to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property
rights.
3. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in
the same zone classifications.
4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received May 4,
1981 shall be the approved layout.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the
following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property
and improvements in the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
AYES: Spencer, Kelly, Tindall
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
SPECIAL EVENT NO. 81-11
Applicant: -Ralph's Grocery Company
To permit a sidewalk sale May 22,23,24, 1981, located at 19041 Beach
Boulevard.
ON MOTION BY TINDALL AND SECOND BY KELLY, SPECIAL EVENT NO. 81-11
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The plot plan received May 18, 1981 shall be the approved
layout.
2. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Finance
Department five (5) days prior to the event.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
May 20, 1981
Page 13
THERE BEI NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
G
es P. Spenc , Secretary
and of Zoning 'Adjustments
1