HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-07-01MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Room B-8, Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 1981 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 81-565
Applicant: Thomas Kardos
To permit the consolidation of five and one-half (5�) parcels of land into
one lot. Subject property is located on the west side of Green Street, north
of Pearce (16691 Green Street).
This request is a categorical exemption Class 5, California Environmental
Quality Act, 1970.
Chairman Tindall introduced the application to the Board. Mr. Thomas Kardos,
applicant,acknowledged receipt of suggested conditions of approval.
Secretary Spencer gave a brief history of the application, stating that the
request was consistent with the Planning Commission's action regarding precise
plan of street alignments.
Mr. Kardos stated that a triplex was planned for the parcel, and that a
small area where a water well is located (serving approximately 4 homes in the
area) is excluded from the request to consolidate the parcels.
Chairman Tindall stated that street improvements were necessary on Green Street
and the two private streets, and would be -required to be dedicated prior to
recordation of the parcel map. In addition, street improvements would be necessary
at the time of development.
The Board discussed conditions of approval with the applicant.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COOPER, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 81-565
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS NOTED HEREIN,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
MINUTES: H.B.
July 1, 1981
Page 2
FINDINGS:
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
1. The proposed consolidation of parcels into one lot for the purposes
of multiple dwelling units is in compliance with the size and shape
of property necessary for that type of development.
2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as
well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the
time the land use designation for triplex development was placed on the
subject property.
4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement
features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in
compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as
well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision
Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCELS:
1. The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Development
Services on June 5, 1981 shall be the approved layout.
2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department
of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder.
3. Green Street and two (2) private streets shall be dedicated to City
standards at the time of recordation of parcel map.
4. Street improvements for Green Street and both private streets
shall be completed at the time of development to the standards
of the Department of Public Works.
5. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department
of Development Services
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-40
Applicant: Jerry Galich
To permit exterior side yard setback at zero, and the elimination of a portion
of landscape screening. Subject property is located on the northwest corner
of Garfield and Crystal.
This request is a categorical exemption class 5, California Environmental Quality
Act, 1970.
I
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 1981
Page 3
Secretary Spencer briefly outlined the application to the Board. Mr. Jerry
Galich was present to represent the application.
Secretary Spencer stated that the request for exemption was based on the
amount of dedication required by the City. He further noted that the Master
Plan of the City indicates a shift of the street alignment to the east, which
would complicate development further.
Fire Representative Cooper, noting his affiliation with Mr. Galich (H.B. Fire
Department employee) stated he would abstain from voting.
Chairman Tindall opened the public hearing. Chairman Tindall expressed concern
regarding the proposed block wall (shown on plan) located on Crystal Street.
The Board recommended that the height of the wall be forty-two (42") inches, and
be of screening type material.
The Board members discussed an irrovocable offer on a portion of land along
Crystal Street for street dedication'purposes with the applicant. The area
involved would be required to be landscaped, and would become a part of the
dedication to the City.
Further conditions of approval were discussed with the applicant. Chairman Tindall
closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION BY TINDALL AND SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-40
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING REASONS, FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
REASON FOR APPROVAL:
Due to an abnormal amount of street dedication coupled with district zoning
requirements, renders subject property's usable area less than that enjoyed
by adjacent properties.
FINDINGS:
1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of a
special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the vicinity and
under identical zone classifications.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including
size, shape, topography,' location, or surroundings, the strict application of
the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifi-
cations.
3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve
the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights.
4. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 1981
Page 4
5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect
the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received June 9, 1981 shall
be the approved layout, subject to the modifications described herein:
a. Applicant shall submit revised plans reflecting a 42" high screening
wall along Crystal Street parking area.
A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the Board. If such plan complies with the modifications outlined by
the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the
administrative file.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following
issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property
and improvements in the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the Board:
a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and.landscaping specifications on
file in the Department of Public Works.
b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall
indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall
delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment.
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. Driveways on Crystal Street shall be of radius type, per the
Department of Public Works Standard Plan 212 A & B.
2. Applicant shall file with the City an irrevocable offer of street
dedication for Crystal Street. Said irrevocable offer shall be subject
to the City Attorney's office approval.
3. Area encompassed within the irrovocable offer shall be landscaped per
Public Works specifications.
1
fJ
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 1981
Page 5
AYES: Spencer, Tindall
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Cooper
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-41
Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Sydney L. Shue
Tc permit a reduction in required open space dimension from 20 feet to
19.5 feet, and from 20 feet to 17 feet respectively. Subject property is
located on the north side of Shelly Drive, approximately 200 feet west of
Fieldston Lane.
This request is a categorical exemption class 5, California Environmental
Quality Act, 1970.
Secretary Spencer briefly outlined the application to the Board. Chairman Tindall
opened the public hearing. Mrs. Sydney Shue was present to represent the
application.
Secretary Spencer noted that the request for the reduction in the required open
space is to accommodate a one story bedroom addition which would encroach minimally
into the open space area. He noted that the total overall open space of the lot
exceeds the required amount. Chairman Tindall closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY COOPER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-41
WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE, WITH REASONS, FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL AS NOTED HEREIN:
FINDINGS:
1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of a
special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the vicinity and under
identical zone classifications.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including
size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of
the zoning ordinance is found to derpive the subject property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications.
3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the
enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights.
4. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications.
5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 1981
Page 6
REASON FOR APPROVAL:
Encroachment is minimal and will provide property with reasonable dimensioned
usable recreational open space. Approval was granted in order to provide
standard of living necessary for the enjoyment of property rights.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received June 17, 1981
shall be the approved layout.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the
following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property and
improvements in the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 81-10
Applicant: Donald Penkoff
To permit the construction of a tilt -up industrial/office building (20,400 sq.
ft. - total mezzanine, 6,000 sq. ft.). Located on the north side of Oceanus
Avenue
IN CONJUNCTION WITH:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 81 -11
Applicant: Donald Penkoff
To permit the construction of a tilt -up industrial/office building of 29,811 sq.
ft., located on the north side of Oceanus Avenue.
IN CONJUNCTION WITH:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 81-12
Applicant: Donald Penkoff
To permit the construction of a tilt -up industrial/office building of 20,400 sq. ft.,
total mezzanine, 6,600 sq. ft., located on the north side of Oceanus Avenue.
Chairman Tindall introduced the applications,to the Board. It was noted that
the applicant was not present. Secretary Spencer briefly outlined the application.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 1981
Page 7
The Board expressed concern regarding deficiencies in parking, and the exact location
of truck doors. It was the consensus of the Board to continue action on the
requests until the Board can meet with the applicant to discuss the plan.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY TINDALL, ACTION ON ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 81-10, 81-11 AND 81-12 WAS CONTINUED IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE BOARD TO MEET
WITH THE APPLICANT.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 81-43A
Applicant: Boardmoor Homes
To permit location of a temporary sales trailer located in the right-of-way of
Grimaud Lane, approximately 600 feet northwest of Admiralty Drive.
Secretary Spencer stated that the applicant had been in contact with him and
would be willing to comply to conditions outlined at the previous meeting
regarding placement of the temporary trailer.
The Board discussed conditions of approval.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY TINDALL, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 81-43A WAS
APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received July 1, 1981 shall
be the approved layout, subject to the following:
a. Posting of a one thousand ($1000.) dollar surety bond per
Section 97930.18(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the
following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property
and improvements in the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
MINUTES: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 1981
Page 8
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. There shall be a thirty-two (32) foot separation between the curbline
and the temporary trailer.
2. The temporary trailer shall back to Grimaud Lane.
3. No parking signs shall be posted along trailer to the standards of
the Department of Public Works and the Huntington Beach Fire Department.
4. An eight (8) inch strip shall be painted around the trailer to direct
traffic around trailer, also, reflectors shall be placed on the trailer
per the Department of Public Works specifications.
5. Applicant shall conform to all applicable provisions of Section 9730.18(a)
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
AYES: Spencer, Tindall, Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
THERE BEING NO OTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
F�
1