Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-04-14t f 6 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B8 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 14, 1982 - 1:15 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Webb, Crosby, Vogelsang, Smith BOARD MEMBER ABSENT: Kelly STAFF PRESENT: Cooper, Zelefsky, Folger MINUTES: ON MOTION BY•CROSBY AND SECOND BY WEBB, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1982, WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Webb, Cooper, Crosby, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED; USE PERMIT NO. 82-7 Applicant: 'Mr. George_C. Mc Cracken Acting Secretary.Webb stated that a call had been received from Mr: Mc Cracken requesting that we continue his application until later in the meeting pending his arrival as he has a meeting with Paul Cook, Director of Public Works. It was the consensus of the Board to table Mr. Mc Cracken's proposal until his arrival. later at the meeting allowing him an opportunity to speak in favor of his request. USE PERMIT NO-. 82-6 (In conjunction with A.R. 82-6 and N.D. 82-8) Applicant: Dr. Henry Syn To permit loading facilities to face public street on the south side, of Engineer Drive, zoned Ml-A, Restricted Manufacturing District'. The -public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Cooper. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Two Dr. Henry Syn and Vince Ruh were present to represent the application. ON MOTION BY WEBB AND SECOND BY SMITH, THE BOARD HAVING FOUND, THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT -HAVE -A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-8, WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES AS IMPOSED ON ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-6.,_BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Webb, Crosby, Vogelsang, Smith, Cooper NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Staff introduced Use Permit No. 82-7. The applicant introduced himself to the Board and stated he had worked closely with Planning and that,.hopefully, his plan meets. all necessary requirements of the Ordinance Code. The public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Cooper as there was no one else present to speak in favor or opposition of Dr. Syn's request. Board discussion ensued. ON MOTION BY WEBB AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 82-7 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS FOLLOWS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property.and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting.of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The revised conceptual plot plan and elevations received March 29, 1982, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered. -2- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H,B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Three the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Traffic circulation and drives; -- Parking layout; Lot area; ' -- Lot width and lot depth; Type of use and.its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; Past administrative action regarding this property. AYES: Webb, Crosby, Vogelsang, Smith, Cooper NOES: None ABSTAIN: None IN CONJUNCTION WITH: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-6. (In conjunction with N.D. 82-8) Applicant: Dr. Henry Syn To permit construction of a 25,042 sq..ft. Industrial Building, located on'the south side of Engineer Drive, zoned Ml-A, Restricted Manufacturing District. Staff introduced Dr..Syn's proposal. The Board advised the applicant that the location of both driveways as shown on his plan are okay with the exception of the driveways width which must meet the minimum requirement of twenty-seven (27) feet. Also, that both driveways must be the,rAdius•type. The applicant was further advised by the Board that the new building will require a fire sprinkler system and that, should the new building and the existing building be used as one building, a fire door would be required. -Dr: Syn replied that to consolidate both buildings could be three years down the road and, until such time, they plan to use both buildings as separate entities. ON MOTION BY WEBB AND SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-6 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A, TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING'PERMITS: 1, The revised conceptual plot plan and elevations received' March 29, 1982, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: a. A revised plan shall be submitted to the Secretary of .the Board showing change, -to radius type driveways. •. Drive approaches shall show a minimum of twenty-seven (27) feet in width per Department -of Public Works standards. -3- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H,B..Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Four b. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Secretary, of the Board for review and approval. If such plans comply with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plans shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action.regarding this property. 2. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the'Department of Public Wor b, Rooftop mechanical equipment screening'.plan..c Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the'type of material proposed to screen said equipment. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. A parcel map shall be filed prior to issuance of building permits and recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2.. A deed restriction shall be filed and recorded with the Orange County Recorder and submitted to the Secretary of the Board indicating that any openings or access ways between the existing building to.the south and proposed abutting building to the north shall be permanently closed if -either property is sold. The restriction shall be recorded for each property. 3.' The subject building shall be fire sprinkered with a separate system which meets Fire Department standards. 4. The proposed building shall comply with the Uniform Buildin Code, specifically Chapter 5. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other.surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed. of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. -4- BZA 4/14/82. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Five 6. if lighting is included in the parking lot area, energy efficient -lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 7. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and.laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets and utilities. 8. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 9. Information on equipment or facilities which may, generate air pollutants shall be submitted to -the -South Coast Air Quality Management District staff for their review prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use within the building. AYES: Webb, Crosby, Vogelsang, Smith, Cooper NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-4 Applicant: --Mt. Paul Hendifar To permit construction of a 12,000 square foot Shopping Center, located on Bolsa Avenue - North side approximately 100 feet east of Springdale Street, zoned C2, Community Business District. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 73-216, adopted on January 16, 1974, and by supplemental information there- to submitted by the applicant. Paul Hendifar was present at the meeting. Acting Secretary Webb indicated that the plan submitted was substantially in compliance with code requirements but that the Board had concerns relating to the stark appearance of the north and east sides of his building adjacent to the abutting residential property. It was suggested to Mr, Hendifar that possibly he could discuss some special treatment for the north.and east elevations with his architect.. Discussion carried between the Board and applicant covering driveway access and.width along with the necessary requirements of the Fire 'Department. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY CROSBY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-4 WAS GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS FOLLOWS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -5- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page -Six CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The revised conceptual plan received April 2, 1982, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, revised elevations shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval'.depicting special treatment for the protection of the adjacent residential properties to the north and east of this development. If such plan complies with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative'file. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating.to the conceptual plan: -- Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action regarding this property. The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board prior to issuance of building permits: 1. Landscape'and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of .the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. 2. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equip- ment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Both entry drives on Bolsa Avenue shall be constructed with radius drive entry to meet Public Works standards. Both driveways shall be a width of thirty-five (35) feet." 2. Each building shall be fire sprinklered to comply with Fire Department standards. 3. A lighting plan shall be submitted to the Secretary -of the Board for review and approval depicting proper':screening and arc spread of the proposed lighting. High pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used -to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent.residential properties and for energy saving. -6- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Seven 4. All building spoils, such as lumber, wire, pipe and other surplus or unusable material shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 5. The -access easement, as shown on plan submitted and approved, shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. A copy of the access easement shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval prior to filing. AYES: Webb, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith, Crosby NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 82-11 Applicant: Mr. Ray Boland To change the orientation of two (2) buildings on a previously approved plan permitting construction of -two additional units on property abutting an arterial highway located at 313/315 Atlanta Avenue, zoned R2. Staff informed the Board that this request is a Categorical Exemption, Class. 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Acting Chairman Cooper opened the public hearing. Ray Boland was present to speak in favor of his approval. The applicant - stated that -this was his second time appearing before -the Board .of Zoning as his architect simply made a mistake. On the original plan submitted for Use Permit No. 80-38,.the interior of the plan was correct but his architect showed the front doors'in.the rear.' of the building facing north. The front doors should have been shown on the south side of his units. The public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Cooper. The ensuing Board discussion changed the previous condition on Use Permit No. 80-38 for filing time of the parcel map and included dedication as outlined in the following Conditions of Approval. ON MOTION BY VOGELSANG AND SECOND BY CROSBY, USE PERMIT NO. 82-11 WAS CONDITIONALLYAPPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED AS FOLLOWS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will - not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in -7- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14,. 1982 Page Eight the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2, The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3, The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1, The;conceptual plot plan and elevations received March 26, 1982, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: a. All dedications shall be made prior to issuance of building permits. b. A parcel map shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. c. The applicant shall submit a letter to the Secretary of the Board, prior to issuance of building permits, limiting the site to three (3) dwelling units. d. Fire protection shall comply with Fire Department standards prior to occupancy. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan:- - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout,- - Lot area;. - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property.and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action regarding this property. GENERAL CONDITION: 1, The recreation rooms are to remain fifty (50) percent open. AYES: NOES: ,ABSTAIN: Webb, Cooper, Crosby, Smith, Vogelsang None None 1 -8- BZA. 4/14/82 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April.14, 1982 Page Nine USE PERMIT NO. 82-7 (Continued from 4/7/82) Applicant: Mr. George C. McCracken To permit'12,500•square feet of mini -storage (two (2) buildings) within the existing Warner�West Shopping Center, located on Warner Avenue approximately 600 feet west of Goldenwest, in a C-2 zoning district. Staff introduced the proposal with Mr. Mc Cracken now present. Acting,.Chairman Cooper opened the public hearing. Mr. Mc Cracken addressed the.Board. He stated that mini -storage is badly needed in the area of Warner Avenue and.Golden West Street. His proposal is to locate the mini -storage facility in the rear of the Warner West -Shopping Center. He said that in the early conception of this proposal he discussed same with Mr. Palin, Director of Development Services and Pat Spencer, Adminstrator of Zoning and Inspection, and they both felt it -was an acceptable use of apparant excess property -located behind the existing commercial buildings which backs up to a flood control. Mr. Mc Cracken submitted to the Board.a parking layout for the entire commercial center including his proposed mini -storage buildings. He claimed the parking requirement, was met with four (4) additional parking spaces being shown. He also submitted a -landscape plan for the entire commercial development including his proposal. He claimed the plan met the -restrictions of the code for retail at'6.77%. The public hearing was closed byt Acting Chairman Cooper. Board discussion ensued. The Board expressed"their concerns to Mr. Mc Cracken. He was told they felt -that this is not an appropriate use in a C-2 zone "Community Business District", and that the appropriate.zone.for mini -storage according to the code is in a M-1 "Light Industrial -District" subject to the granting -of an administrative review. It was felt by the.Board, along with the applicant's concurrence, that before a decision was made,a legal opinion from the Attorney's Office as. to whether or not mini -storage is a permitted use within the-C-2 zoning district should be clarified, ON.MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY CROSBY,.USE PERMIT NO. 82-7 WAS CONTINUED PENDING REPLY FROM -OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE-: m9" , BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board -of Zoning Adjustments April 14," 1982 Page Ten' AYES: Smith, Crosby, Vogelsang, Cooper NOES: Webb ABSTAIN: None ' USE PERMIT NO.-82-12 Applicant: K-Bros. Auto Body - To permit expansion; addition of paint spray booth structure, located at 7412 Talbert, zoned M1-CD, Light Industrial District - Civic District. Staff introduced request and stated that this proposal is categori- cally exempt, Class.-1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Acting Chairman Cooper opened the public hearing with Mr. Bill Kahale (owner) and Mr. George Tomlin present to speak in favor of Use Permit No. 82-12. The Board members reviewed -the -plan Submitted by the applicant and informed Mr. Kahale that as the paint spray booth structure is shown on his plan straddling two property lines that a tentative parcel map is required to consolidate both parcels. The applicant, Mr. Kahale, introduced himself to the Board and stated that this paint booth structure is only a temporary modular structure and could be relocated. The applicant was informed by the Board members of code requirements for repositioning of temporary -structure on one parcel as outlined in the.following Conditions of'Approval. The applicant stated he hoped to start construction of a new building and permanent paint spray booth structure-within.'the next two years. The Board felt that as this modular type structure was -not a permanent structure, the issuance of a Use Permit should be on a temporary basis for two years for future reconsideration by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. Fire protection was discussed with the applicant. The public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Cooper with.no one else present to speak for or -against this proposal. The Board discussed future dedication of Herriman Street. ON MOTION BY.SMITH AND SECOND -BY VOGELSANG, USE PERMIT NO. 82-12 WAS GRANTED ON A TEMPORARY BASIS FOR TWO YEARS WITH FINDINGS AND. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS FOLLOWS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; -10- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page E1•aven b. Property and improvements in'the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the - General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3, The -proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan received March 24, 1982, shall be the approved temporary layout. in its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and -its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action regarding this property. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. The spray paint booth shall remain ten (10) feet from -the property line or.shall be constructed with a one (1) hour fire.wall meeting standards of the Fire Department. 2. Dedications will'be made at the time of the Precise Plan of Street Alignment when adopted by the City Council or if the -applicant receives approval for permanent use of the property. 3. Approval of Use Permit No. 82-12 has been granted for. a two (2) year period: Should an extension, or approval for permanent use be requested, approval will have to be reconsidered by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. AYES: Webb, Cooper, Smith, Crosby, Vogelsang - NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-13 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-9 Applicant: Mr. Lyle A. Overby To permit utilization of a leasehold interest and allow a seasonal parking lot for'the period of-May-22, 1982 through September 7, 1982. Property located at Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street - N.E. corner (1.7•acre rectangular parcel of -land in front of the Edison Generating Station, -11- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning -Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Twelve Staff outlined proposal and stated that as the applicant has used this particular area for the past two years as a "seasonal parking lot" the code requires that after two consecutive seasons, further use as a seasonal parking lot is -prohibited but may be continued upon compliance'with the conditions outlined for "temporary commercial parking lots" per Section 9730.28 of.the code. However, the applicant can not meet the requirements of Section 9730.28, therefore, he is applying for a conditional exception. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Cooper with Lyle Overby and Manuel Chavez present to speak in favor of their application. Mr. Overby introduced himself to the Board. He stated that the property is owned by Edison and that they have obtained a limited lease. Mr. Overby said that as they do not own the property, it is economically not feasible to put in the ordinance improvements for a four month period and then -remove same when the lease is over. He informed the Board that this parking lot is very much needed during the season requested for and that the control and order which is derived from the parking lot is very favorable to the City. The public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Cooper with no one else present to speak in favor or opposition of request. Board discussion carried on necessary access from Newland Street and applicant was advised that access from Pacific Coast Highway was prohibited. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY WEBB, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-13 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-9 WERE APPROVED .WITH IMPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND FINDINGS FOLLOWING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. As the applicant is operating under a short term lease with a public utility (Edison) and that utility is contemplating a future expansion into the requested area which would necessitate the removal of any permanent improvements, it is found to be a hardship to require street improvements for superficial or temporary uses. 2. Subject use is conditioned so that proposed use shall expire day after Labor Day, 1982. Granting of this application will not adversely affect the City's General Plan. 3. The application is found not to be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan received March 29, 1982, shall be the approved layout. -12- BZA 4/14/82 Minot@®! H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Paae Thirteen In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action regarding this property. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Signs to be posted clearly indicating access location on Newland Street. No access shall be permitted off Pacific'Coast Highway. No signs shall be placed which will block or prohibit proper vision at the intersection of Newland and Pacific Coast Highway. 2. Driveway approach off Newland Street shall be repaired with asphalt to provide a level entryway. 3. Surfacing of parking lot shall be to the standards of the Department of Development Services. 4. Inspection of site for compliance with all foregoing conditions shall be made prior to issuance of business license. This approval shall terminate the day after Labor Day, 1982. 5. Applicant shall contact the Orange County.Sanitation District to coordinate an alternative driveway approach off Newland Street. 6. Access from Newland Street shall be prohibited at such time -as construction for a sewer facility restricts access. 7. Width and placement of driveway on Newland shall be subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineer. Said approval shall be obtained at least ten (10) days prior to May 22, 1982. 8. All litter on the property shall be removed at the end of each day. 9. There will be no fencing, swags, cables, signs, etc. allowed in the public right-of-way. 10, The southeast and west property lines of the parking lot shall be secured to disallow traffic movement through areas other than the allowed Newland Street entrance and exit. -13- BZA - 4/14/82 Minutes:. H.B. Board.of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Fourteen AYES: Webb, Smith, Cooper, Vogelsang, Crosby NOES: None ABSTAIN: None TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 82-557 Applicant: Hartge Engineering Corporation To permit consolidation of small lots creating four (4).parcels, located at the south end of Metzler Lane (945 feet south -of Slater Avenue), zoned MI-A-15,000-CD. The Board reviewed Tentative Parcel Map No. 82-557 with Mr. Hartge in attendance. The applicant was informed that in a M1 zone "industrial" condominiums only were allowed and that on his final map the word "commercial" would have to be removed. Mention was made to the applicant that the Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Metzler Lane will require dedication on Parcel No. 4 and that . also on the final map, the twenty (20) foot storm and sewer drain on the south side of Parcel No. 4 will have to be designated. Landlocking of parcels shown as "not -a --part" (both shown as Assessors No. 111-066-03) were of great concern to the Board members. The applicant was informed that these two substandard parcels located between Parcel No.. 3'and Parcel No. 4 on the map submitted would have to be consolidated into one parcel on the final map. Acting Secretary Webb stated that she felt a necessary condition of approval for this map's approval should be that an easement providing adquate access to both parcels (Assessors Parcels Nok.111-066-03) should be shown on -the final map. It was stated by Art Folger, that this parcel map could not be denied based on the fact that the -Board would be creating a landlock parcel as the landlock was already in existence. Mr. Hartge stated the owner of "not -a --part." (assessors parcel No. 111-066-8)' is not willing to sell the parcel and that both the "not -a- part" parcels (both shown as assessors parcel number 111-066-03 on map submitted) were presently in'probate, under the name of Byrd, which Mr.*Metzler is presently trying to purchase. Conditions of Approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY SMITH, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 82^557 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS IMPOSED FOLLOWING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed four lot Industrial subdivision for purpose of Light Industrial Condominiums use are in compliance with the size and shape_ of property necessary for'that-type of develop- ment. -14- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B.'Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Fifteen 2. The General Plan -has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Light Industrial Condominium Use, allowing the construction of buildings, was placed. on the property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL.MAP APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual Tentative Parcel Map received March 29, 1982, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifications described herein: a. On the final map, under General Conditions - Item No. 4, the word "commercial" shall be removed. b. The final map shall reflect the approved Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Metzler Lane (No. 74-2). c. The existing storm and sewer drain easements along the southerly and easterly property lines shall be shown on the map. d. The Secretary of the Board shall receive, under separate instrument, the ultimate street right-of-way (Metzler Lane) across the "not -apart" of parcel (Assessor No. 111-066-09). e. The "not -a -part" parcels (Assessors No. 111-066-03) shall be shown as only one (1) parcel on the final map. f. A recorded access agreement to Metzler Lane for the "not -a -part" parcel shown as Assessors Parcel No. 111-066-03 shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. B. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: a. Prior to permits being issued for development of Parcel No. 4, the "not -a -part" of parcel identified as.Assessors Parcel No. 111-066-08 shall be acquired by the City to be incorporated within Metzler Lane right-of-way. As -15- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes; H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Sixteen an alternative, if said assessors parcel can not be acquired, additional street right-of-way (width satisfactory to the Dept. of Public Works and Fire Dept.) shall be obtained west of said parcel. AYES: Crosby, Smith, Cooper, Webb, Vogelsang NOES: None ABSTAIN: None MISCELLANEOUS ITEM: USE PERMIT NO. 80--37 (Jay Truax Miller/Truax Assoc.) Applicant: Wycliffe Bible Translators, Inc. To permit increased square footage of recreational facility to an approved plan. Subject property is located on the east side of Florida Avenue, approx. 100 yards from Adams Avenue. Staff introduced the proposal. Acting Chairman Cooper reopened the public hearing with no one in attendance to speak in favor or in opposition of the proposal. -The public -hearing was closed. The Board reviewed the plan and elevations submitted and stated that the applicant is choosing to square off the corner of the recreation room in lieu of cut-out originally approved on Use Permit No. 80-37. As parking requirements have been met by the reciprocal parking agreement with the church adjacent to the west property line of Wycliffe Bible Translators, Inc., the Board could see no reason why the additional square footage should not be allowed. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY CROSBY, ADDITIONAL' SQUARE FOOTAGE TO THE RECREATION ROOM WAS.APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED FOLLOWING, BY THE -FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or.working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. -16- BZA 4/14/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments April 14, 1982 Page Seventeen In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity. GENERAL CONDITION: 1. All Conditions imposed on Administrative Review No. 80-59, Administrative Review No. 82-1, and Conditional Exception No. 81-26 shall be imposed on Use Permit No. 80-37. AYES: Crosby; -Cooper, Smith, Vogelsang NOES: None ABSENT: Webb THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. 'i ja'4t Florence Webb, Acting Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments -17- BZA 4/14/82