Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-05-26MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACIi BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, MAY 26, 1982 - 1:15 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Kelly, Smith, Spencer BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Webb, Vogelsang, Crosby STAFF PRESENT: Cooper, Zelefsky MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY KELLY, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF APRIL 21 AND 28, 1982, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kelly, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: Spencer ABSENT: Webb, Vogelsang, Crosby AGENDA ITEMS CONTINUED: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-21 Applicant: Charles Vannoy & Marilyn Baker To permit a six foot high block wall to encroach a maximum of four (4) feet into the required 15-foot front yard setback, located at 19941 Felcliff Lane,. zoned R-1, Single Family Residence District. _Staff introduced proposal with Charles Vannoy & Marilyn Baker present. it was stated that prior to today's hearing Mr. Vannoy mentioned to a Board Member that he had erroneously requested an encroachment of four (4) feet in lieu of five (5) feet necessary for his proposed six foot high block wall into the required 15 foot front yard setback. The applicants were informed that should they wish to have their request altered, the application would have to be continued to another hearing allowing adequate time for the Board to re -advertise. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 26, 1982 Page Two As the applicants stated that they wished to request encroachment into the required fifteen (15) ft. front the Board informed the applicants that in addition to a revised plan showing correct dimensions would have to the Board at their earliest convenience. a five (5) ft. yard setback, re -advertising, to be submitted ON MOTION BY SMITH, AND SECOND BY SPENCER, WITH THE APPLICANTS CONCURRENCE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-21 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 9, 1982, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Smith, Spencer, Kelly NOES: None ABSTAIN: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-19 Applicant: Hale Construction Co., Inc To permit a 14,400 sq. ft. mezzanine and warehouse addition, located at 16242 Beach Boulevard, zoned C-2, Community Business District. Staff outlined the proposal and stated that just yesterday a revised plan reflecting the entire parking layout was submitted to the Board which did not allow time for a plan check. The Board reviewed the plan submitted noting that the two (2) parking spaces on the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard would have to be eliminated and replaced with landscaping. Mr. Dennis Trausch, represent- ing Sport Chalet, introduced himself to the Board and stated that the reason they were late getting their plans in was that the original plan they provided did not indicate the fire protection system which was approved for the Sport Chalet nor did it include access routes and a circulation plan to Stark Street. These items are now shown on the revised plan submitted. Landscaping was discussed. The applicant was informed that the site must be upgraded to meet code requirements of 60 landscaping for the entire site in lieu of 3% which was approved on the original entitlement. The applicant concurred with a one -week continuance in order to allow adequate time to revise his plan reflecting a legend showing the ratio of parking and landscaping prior to the Board taking action. ON MOTION BY SPENCER, AND SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-19 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1982, BY THE FOLLOWIN VOTE: AYES: Kelly, Smith, Spencer NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -2- BZA - 5/26/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 26, 1982 Page Three ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-25 Applicant: Bedroom Galleries, Inc. To permit a tent/parking lot sale on May 29, 30, and 31, 1982. Site location is 16672 Beach Boulevard. - Staff_ introduced the proposal with Mr. Gene Tidgewell, Controller for Bedroom Galleries, present to speak in favor of his application. It was stated by Chairman Kelly that recently the Board had approved a application for a tent/parking lot sale wherein no problems occurred and suggested that the same Conditions of Approval be imposed. The applicant was informed that he will have to contact the Fire Department for an inspection. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY KELLY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-25 WAS GRANTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL APPLICABLE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan received May 17, 1982, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: 1. The applicant shall meet all Fire Department regulations. 2. A certificate of insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 shall be filed with the Finance Department prior to the event. 3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits. 4. Hours of operation shall be - 5/29/82 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 P.M. 5/30/82 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 5/31/82 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. AYES: Kelly, Spencer, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN; None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-22 Applicant: Dyna Marine, Inc. To permit a sidewalk sale to be held from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Friday, June 4, 1982 at 21562 Newland Street. Staff outlined special event with Barbara Gehlke of Dyna Marine present to speak in favor of her application. Ms. Gehlke introduced herself to the Board and distributed a new site plan to each Board Member. She informed the Board that this -3- BZA 5/26/82 Mi.nutes: H.R. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 26, 1982 f'agc, Fcnir event was for the sale of mini marine electronics which would be displayed in front of three buildings of which they occupy (adjacent to 21562 Newland). Discussion carried between the applicant and the Board Members on the noise level of the band, parking, 10' x 10' canopies proposed to display items, circulation, signs, and hours of operation. The applicant was informed that she must contact the Fire Department for an on -site inspection prior to the event. ON MOTION BY SPENCER, AND SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-22 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan received May 26, 1982, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: 1. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department shall be required prior to the event. 2. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Finance Department at least five (5) days prior to the event. 3. Signs shall be prohibited within the public right-of- way area. 4. Sidewalk sale to be held between the hours of 10.:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. AYES: Kelly, Spencer, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-21 Applicant: J. G. Praisler To permit addition of 6,90 sq. ft. to rear of existing retail shop space to permit additional display, storage and dressing rooms for womens ready-to-wear store. Location is 19115 Beach Boulevard - zoned C2, Community Business District. Staff introduced the proposal and stated that all parking requirements have been met. Upon the Board's review of the plan submitted, it was stated that this addition of 690 sq. ft. does not constitute a large enough it 1 -4- BZA 5/26/82 1 P-� Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 26, 1982 Page Five addition to expand the fire sprinkler system. The four (4) hour fire wall separating this particular shop from the others in the shopping center was discussed. Mr. Praisler was present and addressed the Board. He stated that the new proposed addition will be stucco, carrying out the roof line of the center, making it architecturally the same as all buildings in the shopping center. ON MOTION BY SMITH, AND SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-21 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLICABLE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan and elevations received -may 11, 1982, shall be the approved layout. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action regarding this property. General Condition: 1. Applicant shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. AYES: Kelly, Spencer, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-23 Applicant:* Meyer Lasley Wilkinson To permit a 257 seat theatre with joint use of parking agreement. Location is 19042 Magnolia - Suites C & D. Staff outlined proposal and stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. -5- BZA* 5/26/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 26, 1982 Page Six Mr. Michael Lasley, A.I.A. for the project, was present to speak in favor of his application. Staff stated that for a 257 seat theatre, eighty-five (85) parking spaces were required but that only seventy-one (71) parking spaces were being requested for joint use. Mr. Lasley addressed the Board and stated that his clients, Mr. & Mrs. Rutmayer, were proposing a twin cinema theatre in the Garfield Plaza Shopping Center, in Building No. 400 - Suites C and D. One side of the theatre will seat 145 people and the other side will seat 115-people. Board discussion ensued covering the reduction of the total number of required off-street parking spaces to be replaced by joint use. The Board Members felt the use of a theatre at night would not pose a parking problem as the office/professional uses in the building having 100+ parking spaces operates solely during the weekdays but expressed concern with the weekday morning/afternoon walk-in "childrens" theatre. Mr. Lasley stated that Mr. Jedinak, owner of the building, also owns other buildings in the center of which he would not want to jeopardize their operations by impacting parking. He stated he felt as this theatre is going to be geared towards children, that parents would only drop-off their children and would not attend the matinee alleviat a use for parking. Mr. Lasley agreed with the Board that as the principles were expending a sizable amount of money and were mainly interested in the weekday walk-in matinee portion of the theatre, that their concurrence in writing should be received by the Board, prior to issuance of building permits, acknowledging their understanding of the Board's concern with -parking during weekdays and that the six month review could reveal that the parking requirements were not being met and that the Board may suspend the weekday walk-in matinee at the theatre. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-23 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL APPLICABLE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan and elevations received May 17, 1982, shall be the approved layout for the following reasons: 1. Joint use of parking criteria is satisfied for week night and weekends in that the additional theatre requirement of 72 parking spaces could be utilized during the normal closed hours within the office/professional buildings (which have a designed requirement of 100+ parking spaces) located within same complex. -6- BZA 5/26/82 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 26, 1-982 Paq(, Seven 2. Tt was also found that the existing previously required 14 parking spaces assigned to subject building's square footage (1/200) should be sufficient to accommodate week day morning/afternoon "childrens" theatre. in its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues realting to the conceptual plan: - Traffic circulation and drives; - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity; - Past administrative action regarding this property. General Conditions: 1. Weekday morning/afternoon theatre use shall be restricted to childrens use only. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall have the principles of the theatre submit to the Secretary of the Board a letter acknowledging their understanding and concurrence with the Board's concern allowing the weekday walk-in childrens matinee theatre and that within a six month period, the Board shall have monitored the parking needs in the complex during weekdays and will advise the applicant of their findings at a new hearing in six (6) months, at which time should the parking requirements not be met, the Board may suspend the weekday walk-in matinee at the theatre. AYES: Spencer, Smith NOES: Kelly ABSTAIN: None THERE BEING NO OTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. 2�ar1es P. Spencer Actinq Secretary -7- BZA 1 5/26/82