HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-07-21MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Room B-6, Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA
WEDNESDAY, JULY 21, 1982 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Webb, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith
BOARD MEMBER ABSENT: Kelly
STAFF MEMBER PRESENT: Zelefsky
MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY
VOGELSANG, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF JUNE 16, 1982, WERE APPROVED
AS TRANSCRIBED,, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Webb, Vogelsang, Smith
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Evans
ABSENT: Kelly
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-39
Applicant: James E. Neal, General Partner
To permit a 218" encroachment into a 10 ft. rear yard setback. Property
located at 4802 and 4822 Hideout Circle, zoned R-2, Two -Family
Residence District.
Acting Chairman Evans informed the applicant, as well as others
present requesting Conditional Exceptions and a Use Permit, of
guidelines necessary whereby allowing the Board to grant these types
of applications provided that in so -doing, the general purpose of
the Ordinance Code is not affected.
Staff outlined the proposal and stated that this request is categorically
exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. It was
stated that on April 7, 1982, a conditional exception (No. 82-9) was
approved permitting a 318" encroachment into the front yard setback
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Two
of side entry garage for subject property. -At that time, the plan
did indicate the encroachment of 248" into the applicant's rear
yard setback but was not requested on Mr. Neal's application nor
advertised. -The applicant also appeared before the BZA on June 23,
1982, with a tentative parcel map (No. 82-559) for this property
which approved consolidation of the five (5) existing small lots into
one (1) parcel.
Acting Chairman Evans opened the public hearing.
Mr. James Neal, General Partner of Sunset -Orange Partnership, addressed
the Board. When they purchased the property.a few years ago, they
originally contemplated building a triplex but had difficulties in
meeting the access requirements of the Fire Department along the
private alley. A Precise Plan of Street Alignment was approved
allowing for three (3) new. streets in this particular area which
created subject lot to become substandard in size. He said that
because of -the odd shaped configuration of the lot, they have had a
very difficult time in trying to design salable livable units while
at the same time enhancing the neighborhood. He urged approval of
the 218" encroachment into the rear yard setback allowing the dining
room area for both units to be enlarged.
The Board expressed concern because a hammerhead at the end of the
cul-de-sac was not reflected on the plan. George Tindall, Engineer
for the project, informed the -Board that they have received approval
on the plan from Public Works and the Fire Department. He further
stated that the Fire Department did not require the hammerhead.
Mike Mc Mahan, adjacent property owner, stated that he felt the
applicant should conform with the zoning ordinance and the encroach-
ment should not be granted. Jess Mc Mahan, property owner in back
of Mr. Neal's property, questioned the Board as to whether or not
if he applied for a variance for an encroachment in his rear yard
would it be approved.
The public hearing was closed.
Board discussion ensued. Board Member Smith motioned that Conditional
Exception No. 82-39 be approved as the gubject lot is substandard
in size (38 ft. wide by 125 ft. in length) created by the Precise
Plan of Street Alignment, with a private street as the only means
of access onto the property. The motion failed for lack of a
second.
-2- BZA 7/21/82
1
L'
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Three
ON MOTION BY WEBB AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.
82-39 WAS DENIED WITH REASONS FOLLOWING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
REASONS FOR DENIAL:
Conditional Exception No. 82-39 was denied by the Board of Zoning
Adjustments based upon the following reasons:
1. The applicant can modify the design of his building on the
property allowing compliance with the Ordinance Code.
2. No hardship was demonstrated.
3. The proposed layout of the building would impact the property
to the rear because the 218" encroachment would place the
proposed apartment within 714"from the property line.
4. It would create a special privilege inconsistent with past
actions by the Board of Zoning Adjustments.
AYES: Webb, Evans, Vogelsang
NOES: Smith
ABSTAIN: None
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-40
Applicant: Mr. Daniel E. Kafer
To permit a reduction in parking. Property located at 16912 Bolsa
Chica Road.
Staff outlined the proposal and stated that this request is categorically
Exemp?t, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970.
Acting Chairman Evans opened the public hearing.,
Mr. Daniel E. Kafer, proprietor of Daniel's Salon, addressed the Board.
He informed the Board that presently he has an established business
located on Warner Avenue in Huntington Beach. He said they currently
occupy a building with 1,500 sq. ft. which is*not enough space to
effectively serve their growing clientele. The office building he is
considering leasing for his saion.consists.of 2,871 sq. ft. which
has an entitlement -of ten parking spaces. He stated that the center
which he is proposing to relocate to was conceived as a mixed use -
retail and office development of two buildings: an 8,000 sq. ft.
retail building and a 6,000 sq. ft. office building. Current parking
for the center is the code required sixty -spaces determined by the
respective size of the retail and office facilities. Mr. Kafer aorlducted
a parking analysis. He said the parking demand under the most extreme
circumstances is approximately half of the forty spaces provided for
the retail uses. This figure does not include any of the twenty spaces
provided and required for the office building. Because Daniel's Salon
is an established business, with established hours, operating on an
appointment basis, he felt it was possible to make predictions about
-3- BZA 7/21/82
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Four
his parking demand which would be pure guesswork for an entirely new
operation. Taking into account the increased size and number of
stations certainly business and his parking demand would increase,
however, even during peak times they should not exceed approximately
twenty spaces.
There being no one -else present to speak in favor or opposition
of this proposal, the public hearing was closed.
The Board discussed the parking requirements.. Beauty salons require
a parking ratio of 3 spaces per salon chair. The applicants floor
plan calls out ten chairs with one booth allowed for facials, make-up
bar, nails, and chemical services. With the exception of the ten
chairs, the booths were determined by staff to require one parking
space each. The total parking requirement for the proposed salon
is thirty-four parking spaces per Code. The exact request is for
a reduction of twenty-four parking spaces. It was stated that a
field inspection of the proposed site revealed poor circulation within
the center. The Board Members could not justify the applicant's request
for such a large reduction in parking spaces.
ON MOTION BY VOGELSANG AND SECOND BY WEBB, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 82-40 WAS DENIED WITH REASONS AS FOLLOWS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
1. No hardship was demonstrated.
2. Approval would grant a special privilege as no conditional circum-
stances were shown, such as, size, shape or topography applicable
to subject property.
3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 82-40, allowing for the
reduction of twenty-four (24) parking spaces would adversely
affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
AYES: Webb, Evans, Smith, Vogelsang
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82--31
Applicant: Mr. Uluc Davasligil A.I.A.
To permit remodeling of an existing self -serve station (i.e. close
in overhead doors w/sheet metal, revise sales area). Station located
at 15501 Edwards - Southeast corner.
-4- BZA 7/21/82
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Five
Staff introduced the proposal and stated that the Board was in
receipt of a letter dated July 14, 1982, from Economy Oil Company
stating that -the cost of the proposed modernization of the existing
service station site will be seven (7) percent of the total rebuild
of the site.
Mr. David Bullen, A.I.A.. for the project, addressed the Board and
stated that he is a partner of Mr. Uluc Davasligil's, an architectural
firm. The applicant explained the proposed remodeling program.
He stated that all the Gulf Stations, in California, were purchased
by Economy Oil. They wish to move the presently projected shell
back,making it flush with the service bay area, which they intend
to close. There will be no service.bay work rendered, restricting
the station's use -to dispensing of gasoline and selling of auto
related parts. The station will be repainted with a minor change
to the two restrooms allowing one for unisex with the interior rest -
room for use by the employee. They are proposing to enclose the
front with a bullet-proof glass window and have the transaction
drawer tucked in flush with the building. It will be a walk-up
and pay type with updated dispensers.
Discussion carried on about the roof -top mechanical equipment,specifi-
cally, the Hasselman System which meets the standards of the State
and Federal Air Pollution Control, which has a vapor recovery burner
which burns off 99% of vapors released.
Landscaping was discussed at great length. When the site was
originally developed the landscaping requirement was three (3) percent
of the total site. The applicant was informed that additional land-
scaping is required to meet today's code requirement of ten (10)
percent. The applicant stated,that he is not opposed to landscaping
but he felt ten percent of the total site would cut down circulation
on the property. The Board felt, upon review of the applicant's plan,
that there were areas which could be expanded allowing landscaping
to satisfy the requirements,of the Code. The applicant was informed
that -the services of the Planning Staff was available to him should
he need assistance meeting the Code requirement for landscaping.
ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY WEBB, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-31
WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED, WITH
VOTES AS FOLLOWS:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
1. The conceptual plot plan'and elevations received June
24, 1982, shall be the approved layout subject to the
following:
a. A landscape -and irrigation plan shall be submitted
to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval.
-5- BZA 7/21/82
Minutest H.B, Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Six
b. Photographs depicting proposed colors and materials
to'be used shall be submitted to the Secretary of the
Board for review and approval.
If above plan and photos comply with the modifications
outlined by the Board, said plan and photos shall be
made a permanent part of the administrative file.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered
the following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in
the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
B. General Condition:
1. The site shall be restricted to the servicing of automobiles
and sale of automobile related products. A "Mini -Market"
shall not be permitted without the approval of a Conditional
Use Permit by the Planning Commission.
AYES: Webb, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith
NOES: None
ABSTAIN• None
USE PERMIT NO. 82-22
Applicant: Donald W. & Catherine H. Mac Leod
To permit an addition to a residence on property with a non -conforming
yard, located at 712 Delaware Street (Oldtown Specific Plan).
Staff outlined the request and stated that a field inspection revealed
that over the applicants garage there is an existing structure which
appears could be used for habitable purposes. It was stated that
its use is unknown. This structure over the garage was not shown
on the plans submitted by the applicants. Staff stated that the Code
requirement for site areas of less than 6,000 square feet, the
maximum number of units permitted is one (1) dwelling unit. It
was further stated that for this property, an income unit is pro-
hibited and that parking would be inadequate. Staff was unable to
locate a record of a building permit having been issued for this
structure.
Acting Chairman Evans opened the public hearing allowing those
in favor of the proposal to speak first.
-6- BZA 7/2.1/82
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Seven
Mr. and Mrs. -Donald Mac Leod were present. Mrs. Mac Leod introduced
herself to the Board and commented on the structure over the garage.
She stated that the reason staff was unable to locate a copy of the
building permit was that many files of the 1940's and early 1950's
were destroyed by a fire. She said her building permit is No. 2424,
and that the property has been -paying assessments on the addition
of the double car garage and studio structure since it was built.
Mrs. Mac Leod said they purchased the property five years ago when
it was zoned R-2 property which has since been changed by City Council
to Oldtown Specific Plan. She stated that they have never rented
the studio nor do they have a desire to do so. They need space badly.
They presently have one bedroom and they need two bedrooms so that
her husband can have a bedroom in the same house. She intends to
use the studio for her antique dolls. She stated that the proposed
addition of 451 square feet will be livable space on the ground
floor with a change to the'roofline. Mrs. Mac Leod was questioned
by the Board as to the stairway shown into the attic. Mrs. Mac Leod
stated that a person cannot stand up straight in the attic and that
the addition to the roofline is only to carry through the aesthetics
of their unique little home along with ventilation. Mr. Mac Leod
stated that if the Board has an objection to the windows shown in
the proposed roofline, possibly they could be replaced with skylights.
Discussion carried on between the Board and Mr. and Mrs. Mac Leod
on the City's Enhancement'Program which granted approval for their
deferred loan for their proposed addition
There being no one else present to speak in favor or opposition
of this request, the public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman
Evans.
Board discussion carried on concerning possible dedication to the alley,
rear yard setback, existing structure over the garage exceeding
fifteen (15) feet in height, habitable floor space, open space,
and lot coverage. It was felt by the Board that action could not
be taken until many concerns were resolved. The applicants agreed
to meet with staff to review their plans. It was also felt by the
Board Members that possibly the application may have to be heard
by resolution to the Planning Commission through a conditional
exception application.
ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY WEBB, USE PERMIT NO. 82-22 WAS
CONTINUED TWO WEEKS, TO THE MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1982, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Webb, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
-7� BZA 7/21/82
Minutes: H.B, Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Eight
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-41
To permit a reduction of two (2) parking spaces
IN CONJUNCTION WITH
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-34
To permit a 10 ft. x 31 ft. concrete mat and sump with cover
as an addition to existing building.
Location for above applications is 5770 Research Drive.
Staff introduced both proposals and stated they are both Cat-
egorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality
Act, 1970.
Acting Chairman Evans opened the public hearing for Conditional
Exception No. 82-41 also heard in conjunction with Administrative
Review No. 82-34.
Mr, Jim Templeton, representing SII Servco, was present to speak
in favor of this application. He stated that in order to construct
a concrete matland filter' -.sump with cover and a truck well they
will have to eliminate two of the required twenty-three parking
spaces. They have talked -to the owners of the building and have
reached an agreement whereby, should they terminate their lease,
the two parking spaces will be replaced. He stated that they have
five (5) employees total, with two being the owners who visit the
site approximately two times.a week. He said they have twice as
much parking as they need. The two parking spaces are to be removed
from the southwest side of their building. The filter sump is
used for pressure washing of oil field tools and the truck well,
located in the inside of the building, is where the tools will be
loaded, by a forklift, for return to their clients. He stated
that the tools are partially cleaned at -the oil rigs. The filter
sump is a vacuum type, which ties into'the sewer outfall after
being filtered. It was state& that when permits are issued for
construction, measures are taken to insure that,the filter sump
meets all City and Orange County Sanitation District requirements,
preventing oil -and -:,other chemicals from going into the sewer system.
The public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Evans.
Conditions of Approval were discussed.
ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.
82-41 (In conjunction with A.R. No. 82-34) WAS APPROVED WITH
-8- BZA 7/21/82
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Nine
FINDINGS, REASONS, AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOLLOWING, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS AND REASONS:
1. The filter sump is necessary for the operation.of the applicant's
business.
2. As the filter sump must be installed outside, the only space
available is in the parking area creating the reduction of
two,(2) parking spaces, which will not impact the parking on
site.
3. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property
in the same zone classifications.
4. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order
to preserve one or more substantial property rights.
5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The conceptual plot plan received July 12, 1982, shall be the approved
layout, subject to the following:
1. Prior to issuance of building permits, a letter from the
owner of the building shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the Board stating that upon terminate of the applicant's
lease, the filter sump shall be removed and the two (2)
parking spaces restored. Should the need continue for the
filter sump upon termination of the applicant's lease, the
owner shall come before the Board of Zoning Adjustments
to request another entitlement for continued use.
In its approval action, the Board -of Zoning Adjustments considered
the following issues -relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
- Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in
the immedaite vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
AYES: Evans, Vogelsang, Smith
NOES: Webb
ABSTAIN: None
-9- BZA 7/21/82
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Ten
ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 82-34 (In conjunction with C.E. No. 82-41) WAS APPROVED
BY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The conceptual --plot plan received July 12, 1982 shall be the
approved layout, subject to the following:
1. Prior.to issuance of building permits, a letter from the
owner of the building shall be submitted to the Secretary
of the Board stating -that upon termination of the applicant's
lease, the filter sump shall be removed and the two (2)
parking spaces restored. Should the need continue for the
filter sump upon termination of the applicant's lease, the
owner shall come before the Board of Zoning Adjustments to
request another entitlement for continued use.
In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered
the following issues relating to the conceptual plan:
- Traffic circulation and drives;
- Parking layout;
- Lot area;
Lot width and lot depth;
- Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in
the immediate vicinity;
- Past administrative action regarding this property.
AYES: Webb, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS:
Approval and adoption of By -Laws for the Board of Zoning
Adjustments.
ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY WEBB, BY-LAWS (COPY ATTACHED)
WERE APPROVED AND ADOPTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Smith, Webb, Vogelsang, Evans
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
-10- BZA 7/21/82
1
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
July 21, 1982
Page Eleven
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.;$2-16 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-17
Applicant for both applications: U. S. Rentals, Inc.
ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, DATE CHANGE FROM JULY
24, 1982 TO SEPTEMBER 18, 1982 FOR PUBLIC AUCTION TO BE HELD AT
7661 WARNER AVENUE, WITH PARKING AT 17101 NICHOLS STREET, WAS
APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTES:
AYES: Smith, Vogelsang, Webb, Evans
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
THEIR BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
Florence Webb,.Acting Secretary
Board of Zoning Adjustments
Attachment: By -Laws
-11- BZA 7/21/82
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Section 1. Title. Pursuant to Article 981 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code the official title of this
Board shall be "Board of Zoning Adjustments"
which may also be referred to as the "Board".
Section 2. Officers. The officers of this Board shall be a
Chairman and Vice -Chairman who shall be elected
by majority vote of the Board. They shall hold
office for a period of one year or until their
successors are elected. To fill a vacancy in the
unexpired term of Chairman or Vice -Chairman, a
member of the Board shall be elected for such
unexpired term. An election of officers shall be
held at the last meeting in December of each year
and the elected Chairman and Vice -Chairman shall
assume office at the first meeting in January of
each year. No person shall occupy the office of
Chairman or Vice -Chairman for more than two
consecutive terms. In addition, there shall be a
Secretary of the Board. This office shall be
incumbent upon the Director of the Planning
Department or a member of said Department appointed
by the Director. The Secretary may or may not be
the voting member.
Section 3. Duties of the Chairman and Vice -Chairman. The
Chairman shall preside at the meetings of the
Board and in case of his absence or inability
to act, the Vice -Chairman shall act. In the
absence of both the Chairman and Vice -Chairman,
•the Board shall appoint a Chairman pro tempore
who shall serve only until such time as the
Chairman or Vice -Chairman returns and is able to
act. During this period of time the Chairman
pro tempore shall have all the powers and duties
of the Chairman or Vice -Chairman. The Chairman
shall have the power to make or second any
motion and to present and discuss any matters
notwithstanding the fact that he is the presiding
officer of the Board.
Section 4. Duties -of the Secretary. It shall be the duty
of the Secretary to keep a full and true record
of -all proceedings of the Board, schedule matters
for hearing and consideration by the Board, notify
members of meetings and perform such other duties
required by statute, law or the Board.
Section 5. Advisors. The Chairman may, with the consent of
the Board, request the attendance, at Board meetings
of any officer or employee of the City to assist
the Board in its deliberations.
Section 6. Meetings. All meetings of the Board during which
formal action is.taken shall be open and public.
Regular meetings shall be held on Wednesday of each
week at 1:30 P.M. in the Board of Zoning Adjustments'
Conference Room. A regular meeting may be adjourned
.to a date certain which shall be specified in the
order of adjournment and when so adjourned shall be
a regular meeting for all purposes. Such adjourned
meeting may likewise be adjourned and when so
adjourned shall be a regular meeting for all purposes.
In the event a regular meeting date falls on a legal
holiday, such meeting date shall be deemed to be the
day following such holiday.
Special meetings may be called by the Chairman
or, in his absence, by the Vice -Chairman through
written notice delivered personally to each member
at least three hours before the specified time of
the proposed meeting. At any special meeting the
power of the Board to transact business shall be
limited to the matters specified in such written
notice.
Section 7. Attendance. Regular attendance at meetings of
the Board is required of all members to enable
the Board to discharge the duties imposed upon
it by law.
Section 8. Quorum.. At any meeting of the Board, three
members of the Board shall constitute a quorum
for the transaction of business. At least three
affirmative votes shall be required to approve
any application. In the event there is no quorum
,at a Board meeting, the Secretary shall adjourn
such meeting or adjourn to a date certain.
Section 9. Order of Business. The order of business for
regular or special meetings shall be:
1. Call to order by the Chairman.
2. Consideration of matters on the
agenda prepared by the Secretary.
3. Any other business which may
properly come before the Board.
Section 10. Parliamentary Procedure. The Parliamentary Rules
laid down in "Roberts Rules of Order" shall in
general govern the proceedings of this Board, but
the Chairman shall decide all questions of order
subject to appeal by the Board and all such appeals,
shall be decided by a majority of the members
present. The Chairman shall vote on all matters
coming before the Board whether there is a tie vote
or not. No member may vote at a meeting by proxy
or by any method other than being personally
present and casting his vote. A Board member
may designate an alternate to represent him/her
in the event of his/her absence. Said alternate
It
1
shall be vested with the same voting power
as the Board member. Every member shall give his
vote on all questions brought to vote. Every
member present who does not properly disqualify
himself and who remains silent and fails to record
'a vocal vote on any question brought to a vote
shall have his vote recorded as an affirmative
or aye vote.'
Any member present who deems himself disqualified
for any reason to vote upon any question may so
declare himself as disqualified. Said member
shall state his reasons for disqualification if
called upon by a member of the Board. Any such
member who has so disqualified himself shall have
that fact shown in.the minutes of the meeting and
shall not be required to vote upon the question on
which he has -disqualified himself. His failure to
vote shall be recorded as neither an aye or nay vote.
In the event a member disqualifies himself from
voting, and if only three members are present, the
remaining two members shall constitute a quorum
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.
.1
Section 11. Changes in By -Laws. A majority vote of all members
entitled to vote shall be required to amend these
by-laws. Copies of a proposed amendment shall be
given to each member at a regular meeting or shall
be mailed to each member at least 5 days prior to
a meeting.
Section 12. Adoption. Approved and adopted as the By -Laws of
,the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of
Huntington Beach this 21st day of July , 19823
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Webb, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kelly
1