Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-03-09i MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 1983 - 1:30 P.M. Council Chamber - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris STAFF PRESENT FOR APPROVAL OF MINUTES ONLY: Crosby MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 1983, WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Cooper, Smith, Crosby NOES: None ABSTAIN: Evans, Morris ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY GODFREY, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 23, 1983, WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING1VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Crosby, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: Evans, Cooper, Morris REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-2 Applicant: Mr. Jay Jeffries . To permit a patio cover to encroach 4 ft. 4 inches into rear yard setback (for patio support posts). Property located at 17161 Westport. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Two Chairman Evans informed the applicant, as well as others present requesting Conditional Exceptions and Use Permits, of guidelines necessary whereby allowing the Board to grant these types of applications provided that in so doing, the general purpose of the Ordinance Code is not affected. Secretary Godfrey introduced the applicant's request and informed the Board that the Code now states "patio covers may be constructed within five (5) feet of the rear property line. Further, that a petition for an exception may be filed where practical difficulties or hardship exist." Chairman Evans opened the public hearing. Mr. Jeffries introduced himself to the Board. He stated that in the area where his patio originally existed he added an addition to his home. He submitted pictures to the Board Members for review showing the patio support posts placed one foot 4 inches from his rear property line. He stated he obtained a building permit for the patio structure but that the City inspector would not sign off his permit as a complaint had been received from his neighbor. He claimed his adjacent neighbors had no objection to the encroachment. He felt the patio structure to be an enhancement to his neighborhood and indicated his hardship to be due to severe western sun exposure. Carole M. Garrett, 17163 Roundhill Drive, addressed the Board. She stated that the relationship between Westport Drive and Roundhill Drive is a very unique one. The fronts of all property on Roundhill Drive face the rear of all property on Westport Drive. Consequently, all construction to Westport's rear yards has an impact, both aestheti- cally and financially to Roundhill homeowners. She stated it is her concern, as well as her neighbors, that a precedent could be set with Mr. Jeffries' encroachment to the very limit of his rear property line. She felt that if this encroachment is permitted, another precedent is set, and it is anyone's guess what might follow. She felt that Mr. Jeffries desired encroachment to alleviate sun exposure is shared by all the homeowners, both on Westport and Roundhill. She stated his problem with sun exposure could be alleviated by use of tinted windows, shutters, draperies or possibly by planting sun screening shrubbery. She urged denial of Conditional Exception No. 83-2. The public hearing was closed by Chairman Evans with no one else present to speak in favor or opposition of the applicant's request. Secretary Godfrey pointed out, upon the Board's review of the plot plan submitted, that by Mr. Jeffries' relocation of his original patio structure into his rear yard setback the patio cover exists one (1) fo four (4) inches from the rear property line, with the eave-overhang eight (8) inches from the property line with the possibility of some encroachment into the public right-of-way created by the curve of the street. -2- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Three Discussion ensued. It was felt that by modifying the structure Mr. Jeffries could comply with the Code requirement for setbacks. Findings for denial were outlined. ON MOTION BY COOPER AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-2 WAS DENIED BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING REASONS, FOLLOWED BY VOTE: REASONS FOR DENIAL: 1. There are no exceptional circumstances which apply to the property that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed in the R-1 District. The rear yard setback from the existing dwelling to the rear property line varies from 13'7" to 16'. This area, between the existing dwelling and the rear property line, is sufficient in size to permit a patio cover having a five (5) foot setback as required by Section 9103.3.3 of the Ordinance Code without granting a conditional exception. 2. Granting of a conditional exception would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations in the R-1 District and might set a precedent for future requests of this nature. 3. The conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation of one or more substantial property rights. There are feasible alternatives to the proposal, including the relocation of the patio to the south side of the lot. 4. Granting of the conditional exception would be materially detrimental to adjacent properties. The proposed encroachment into the rear yard setback area would place a structure on the subject property less than the minimum allowed distance from the rear property line and make it visible to the adjacent properties on Roundhill Drive. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Morris NOES: Smith ABSTAIN: None The appeal process was explained to the applicant. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-3 Applicant: Mr. Michael Myers To permit an addition to an existing residence to encroach 15+ feet into the required side yard setback. Property located at 4002 Morning Star Drive. Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The public hearing was opened with no one present to speak in favor -3- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Four or opposition of the proposal. The public hearing was closed by Chairman Evans. As the Board had concerns with the plan submitted, it was the consensus of the Board to continue this application one week, to the meeting of March 16, 1983, to re -notify applicant of necessary action on his part justifying hardship. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY MORRIS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-3 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF MARCH 16, 1983, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris USE PERMIT NO. 83-7- Applicant: Mr. Keary Gregg To permit construction of three (3) apartment units on property abutting an arterial highway and presently containing one (1) single- family dwelling. Property located at 2513 Delaware Street (west side of street, eighty feet from Yorktown Avenue). Chairman Evans introduced the applicant's proposal and stated that this request is a categorical exemption, Class. 2, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that the City Code requires that a Use Permit application be approved prior to construction of dwelling units which abut an arterial highway. Primary consideration of the Board will be the architectural treatment of the proposed structures. The public hearing was opened with Mr. Gregg, applicant, present to speak in favor of his proposal. He addressed the Board and thanked them for their consideration. He informed the Board that it is his intention to abide with all Code requirements. There being no one else present wishing to address the applicant's request, the public hearing was closed. Upon the Board's review of the plans submitted, it was the feeling of all of the Board Members that not only will the proposed apartment complex meet the Code requirements but, in addition, will be compatible aesthetically and architecturally within -the R-2 Residential Zone. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY COOPER, USE PERMIT NO. 83-7 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: -4- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Five FINDINGS: 1. The construction as proposed will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity nor detrimental to property and improvements in the vicinity of the proposed construction. 2. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. The architectural treatment as presented in the plans submitted on February 17, 1983, are in accord with the intent and provisions of the City Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The site plan and elevations received February 17, 1983, are the conceptually approved plans, subject to the following: (a) A landscape plan, showing details of planting, complying with Article 979 of the H.B. Ordinance Code, shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board (with a copy to Public Works) prior to issuance of building permits. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity. General Conditions: (1) All applicable Code requirements shall be met. (2) All improvements within the public right-of-way (including tree relocation/replacement) shall meet the requirements of Public Works. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -5- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Six USE PERMIT NO. 83-8 Applicant: Lance & Denise Jacot To permit alteration of building having non -conforming yard. Property located between Lake Street and Main Street in the Wesley Park Section (215 Crest Avenue). Chairman Evans introduced the application stating that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that Mr. and Mrs. Jacot are potential clients of the City of Huntington Beach's Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Program. The Neighborhood Enhancement Program specifically provides a variety of home improvement loans as a means of upgrading residential properties. Mr. Godfrey further stated that existing buildings, which are non- conforming only because of yard requirements, may be altered or enlarged. In a single-family development any addition or enlargement may be along existing yard setbacks if the existing yard setbacks were legally established at the time of initial development of the building. Mr. and Mrs. Jacot wish to add a second -story to their home constructed in 1960. The proposed addition conforms to all other zoning requirements. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Evans. Mr. Jacot addressed the Board and stated he felt his proposed addition will enhance the quality of his neighborhood. The public hearing was closed. Conditions for Approval were discussed with the applicants. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 83-8 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOLLOWING, BY VOTE AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS: 1. Review for approval action has found that the proposed expansion will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity nor injurious to property or improve- ments in the vicinity. 2. The City's General Plan will not be adversely affected. 3. This particular lot is a triangular piece having an awkward configuration. The topography of the lot allows consideration for granting approval because of placement of a single-family structure with relation to the sideyards. -6- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Seven CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan received February 22, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifications described herein: (a) In conjunction with the submittal of building plans, a revised site plan in more detail, along with elevation plans showing the second -story addition, shall be submitted and approved. If such plans comply with,the modifications outlined by the Board, said plans shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. 2. General Conditions: (a) All pertinent City codes shall be complied with prior to final inspection. (b) If the proposed addition exceeds one-third (1/3) value of the existing building, prior to issuance of building permits 2-1/2 ft. of alley shall be dedicated. This determination shall be made by the building official. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 83-2 In Conjunction With ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-3 To permit construction of a 3,618 square foot Industrial Building. Property located at southeast corner of Woodwind Drive and Sampson Lane. The Board reviewed the information contained in the negative declaration request and considered mitigation measures applicable to the project. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY MORRIS, THE BOARD HAVING FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 83-2, WITH THE MITIGATING MEASURES AS IMPOSED ON ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-3, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -7- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Eight Secretary Godfrey outlined the applicant's request to permit an office and industrial storage use in the light manufacturing zone (M-1). Board discussion carried with the applicant - Ms. Donna Oliveira, representing the interest"of the property owner. As the plan submitted was short on required parking, the applicant was informed that a preferable option for placement of the trash enclosure would be to construct same within the architectural treatment of the outside of the building allowing use of this particular area for required parking. In addition, Code requirments covering landscaping and driveway width for an industrial building were discussed. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY COOPER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-3 WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOLLOWING, FOLLOWED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The revised conceptual plot plan dated March 2, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to the modifications described herein: (a) Parking layout to be redesigned to accommodate a total of nine (9) parking spaces. (b) Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Dept. of Public Works. (c) The trash enclosure, as shown on the plot plan submitted March 2, 1983, shall be -incorporated into the design as an integral part of the structure. (d) The drive -way approach shown on site plan dated March 2, 1983, shall be increased from 20 ft. to 27 ft. A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. 2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. -8- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Nine 3. If lighting is included in the parking lot energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 4. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 5. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 6. Information on equipment or facilities which may generate air pollutants shall be submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District staff for their review prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use within the building. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation to property and improvements in the immediate vicinity. B. GENERAL CONDITION: 1. Conceptually approved elevations received February 11, 1983, shall be compatible in architectural treatment and surface materials to industrial uses in the vicinity and shall be approved by the Secretary of the Board. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-4 Applicant: Martha Velastegui To permit establishment of a beauty salon within an existing shopping center, with reciprocal use of adjacent parking spaces. Property located at 19539 Beach Boulevard (Beach & Yorktown Center). -9- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Ten Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed all concerned that the existing parking layout and number of spaces now provided will not be adequate to provide the parking for the intended use. Section 979, of the City's zoning code allows that -the Board may administratively approve the restriping.to add spaces by he compact-car spaces and/or create reciprocal agreements that will provide the additional spaces offsite/onsite. The Board may also take under consideration a reduction in the -required parking when it can be -shown that"the-parking facilities have divergent needs'on the basis of nonuse by one user during a certain period of use by another. Martha Velastegui, applicant, introduced herself to the Board. She informed the Board Members of herpreferenceto go with a reciprocal parking agreement and Joint Use of Parking. Staff advised the applicant- of -process for reciprocal parking agreement recordation. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND-BY-MORRIS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-4 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND -CONDITIONS_ FOR APPROVAL FOLLOWING, BY FOLLOWING VOTE: - FINDINGS: 1. The location and walking distance from the offsite parking will not exceed 150 feet. 2. There is no conflict in the principal operating hours of the buildings -or' -uses for which reciprocal parking facilities are -provided. - 3. The restriping of the parking lot to provide for compact car parking will provide a greater number of spaces than is now provided.- 4. There is no -parking overflow problem existing'at this location. The proposed use -is not -expected -to adversely affect the parking situation. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: The conceptual plot plan received February 18, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to -the modification described herein: -10- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Eleven 1. A revised striping plan shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval of parking layout. Compact parking shall comply with Sections 9792.8 through 9792.8.2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: - Parking layout; - Lot area; - Lot width and lot depth; - Type of use and its relation the immedaite vicinity. B. GENERAL CONDITIONS: to property and improvements in 1. The applicant shall record a reciprocal parking agreement with the Orange County Recorder's Office providing joint use of parking. Prior to recordation, a copy of the agreement shall be approved by the Secretary of the Board; henceforth to the Department of Development Services permanent file. 2. The hours of operation shall not be in conflict with principle operating hours of other use for which reciprocal parking has been provided. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES:* None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-5 Applicant: Edwards-Lindborg/Dahl, Ltd. Partnership To permit use of an office -trailer as a subdivision sales office. Subject property is located on the east side of Edwards Street, approximately 660 feet south of Ellis Avenue. Chairman Evans outlined the applicant's request and stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey commented that a subdivision sales office, in conjunction with a subdivision, may be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. A trailer coach can be used for commercial sales purposes as outlined in the following Conditions of Approval and concurred with by the applicant. -11- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Twelve Mr, Robert Flynn, representing the Partnership, addressed the Board. Fie said the temporary sales trailer will be used for the display of a four (4) foot model of the subdivision and used for the sales staff and potential buyer for marketing discussions of the subdivision development. The surrounding area consists of vacant land with oil producing wells. The Limited Partnership is desirous of selling vacant lots improved with utility systems and streets. The temporary sales trailer will be used for approximately one (1) year or until the last lot of the subdivision is sold.. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-5 WAS GRANTED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan received and dated February.25, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: A. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: 1. The parking area shall be graveled and oiled to control dust and to allow for emergency vehicles on the site. 2. The use shall be discontinued and the trailer coach shall be removed within 30 days following sale of the last parcel. 3. A cash bond of $500.00 shall be posted with the City for the sales office to guarantee compliance with all provisions of the Code and to assure the removal of the coach in the time specified. 4. The applicant or developer shall furnish a site plan of suitable scale showing the placement of trailer coach sales office, all signs (including parking and directional signs), parking and landscaping. 5. This Administrative Review permit will be subject to review by the Board of Zoning Adjustments one (1) year after approval to insure compliance with all conditions and City Code. 6. The sales office shall not be converted or expanded into a general business office for the contractor or the developer without a review by the Board. 7. Upon removal of the trailer coach, and the discontinuance of the sales office use, the area shall be landscaped to conform with the general landscaping of the subdivision. 8. Perimeter fencing to be installed to separate the trailer coach and parking area from the construction site. -12- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Thirteen 9. The additional trailer presently existing on the site shall be removed. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-6 Applicant: Hale Construction Company, Inc. To permit addition of a 6,360 square foot mezzanine to an existing building, including a 6,000 square foot future mezzanine. Property located at 16242 Beach Boulevard (east side of street - Sport Chalet). The applicant's request was introduced by Chairman Evans who informed the Board that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey briefly outlined the proposal stating that based on the proposed use, as the mezzanine area requires additional parking, by restriping using compact parking, off-street parking as required by Code could be accomplished. Dennis Trausch, representing Hale Construction, addressed the Board and spoke in favor of his request. Conditions of Approval were discussed with the applicant. ON MOTION BY COOPER AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-6 WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOLLOWING, BY VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The conceptual site plan dated February 25, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: a. Landscaping consisting of six (6) percent of the total site area. All deteriorated landscaping shall be replaced. b. A parking plan shall be submitted reflecting the location of compact parking and striping which shall comply with S.9792.8 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. A plan delineating said modifications shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board. If such plan complies -13- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Fourteen with the modifications outlined by the Board, said plan shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. 2. 'GENERAL CONDITIONS: a. All Conditions of Approval imposed on Administrative Review No. 82-19 shall be complied with prior to issuance of building permits. b. All outside storage shall be eliminated. AYES:_ Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 83-9 Applicant: Camel Records To permit a one'(1) day temporary outdoor event to be held in the Newland Shopping Center, 19746 Beach'Boulevard: Chairman Evans introduced the special event. Secretary Godfrey stated that the applicant, Camel Records, is requesting authorization to conduct a rock concert, at the Newland Center, to be held on Sunday, March 13, 1983, between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. 100-150 people are expected. The Board Members discussed the Conditions for Approval at great length with Sam Gennawey, owner of Camel Records, with particular emphasis placed on the necessity of keeping the access isles maintained for emergency vehicles. ON MOTION BY COOPER AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 83-9 WAS MINISTERIALLY APPROVED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plot plan received March 7, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: 1. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department shall be required prior to the event. 2. The Certificate of Insurance Form, provided by the'City of Huntington Beach, shall be executed by the applicant's insurance carrier and returned to the Secretary of the Board no later than March loth, for final approval by -14- BZA 3/9/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 9, 1983 Page Fifteen the City Attorney's Office. 3. Appropriate signs (temporary) for the direction of traffic and on -site parking shall be provided by the applicant. Said signs, location, and content to be as recommended by the Traffic Division of the Police Department. 4. Applicant shall comply with all fire safety standards. 5. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur, and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. 6. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits. 7. Provisions shall be made to provide two (2) sanitation facilities on site. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Smith, Morris NOES: None ABSTAIN: None THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. 1 Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments I' -15- BZA 3/9/83