Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-05-17APPROVED AS CORRECTED ON 6-7-83 1 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1983 - 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: CONSENT CALENDAR: Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, - Civic Center California Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir Erskine ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR THE CONSENT CALENDAR, CONSISTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 3, 1983, CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN NO. 83-2, AND EXTEN- SION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11519 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-18, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: Livengood, Porter, Schumacher CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-6 (Continued from April 19, 1983) Applicant: W & B Builders/Seaside Village Towne Homes Assoc. A request to revise a previously approved conditional use permit to allow the addition of security gates and wrought iron fencing within a planned residential development located at the south- west corner of Atlanta Avenue and Beach Boulevard. Florence Webb informed the Commission that, although a letter has been received from the applicant requesting another continu- ance, there were persons in the audience who would like the opportunity to address the Commission on this matter. Chairman Porter reopened the public hearing. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 2 Julie Perrine, 7815 Bayport, addressed the Commission to present an alternative solution to the fencing problem proposed by a group of the tenants in the rental portion of the project. She noted that the majority of the renters are in favor of a physical separation from the ownership units, saying that it does not seem to be a work- able situation to keep the two projects in one development. However, the present proposal will cut the rental units off from direct access to Atlanta Avenue which is presently available to them by going through the condominium development, while still allowing traffic from the ownership units to go through the rental property; this is not an equitable solution in the eyes of the renters. They would like the gate at Poolside and Mainmast to also be a fixed gate with a knox box for real emergency situations, and would also like a gate installed at Poolside and Atlanta leading directly from the rental complex out to Atlanta. This could be an exit only in order to avoid creating a traffic problem, but it would allow much easier exit for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic out of the project. Ms. Perrine also informed the Commission that the renters would like to see their project remain under planned residential development zoning and not changed to apartments, questioning whether when the units are available for sale after the required 30 years the project would again be rezoned back to planned development. There were no other persons to address the Commission on this matter, and the public hearing was closed for this meeting. Secretary Palin brought the Commission up to date on meetings held between staff, the property owners in the ownership units, and the developers of the project to try to arrive at a workable solution. After brief discussion, the Commission directed that staff obtain a name and address of a representative of the rental units and make sure that they are notified of any future action regarding this re- quest. ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY HIGGINS CONDIITONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-6 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 7, 1983, AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-9/TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11955 (Continued Applicant: City Redevelopment Agency from 5-3-83) To permit construction of 96 senior citizen condominium units and 220 senior citizen rental units and the subdivision-of'numerou's par- cels of land into 10 lots located on the south side of Talbert Avenue west of Beach Boulevard. -2- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 3 Mikd Adams presented slides of the project area which illustrated the relationship of the proposed layout of the subject project to the surrounding residential and industrial areas. He discussed project density and site coverage, unit mix and location, buffer- ing from adjacent properties, treatment of easements and setbacks, building elevations and separation, open space, and recreation areas to serve the total project. Commissioner Schumacher questioned staff as to whether the pro- ject has been designed to address all requirements of the "Q" zoning existing on the property and whether or not there will be conditions applied to address the recommendations in the noise study. Mr. Adams replied that all "Q" requirements have been addressed and conditions will be recommended for mitigation of noise impacts at the common property line with the industrial. He also noted that when an industrial development on Lot 10 is approved it will be required to be designed not to adversely impact the sub- ject project. Commissioner Livengood inquired about the future development of Lots 6, 7, and 8, held under private ownership. Mr. Adams indi- cated that they may not be specifically senior -oriented units and may be market -rate condominiums with self-contained open space and recreational facilities. The public hearing was opened. Dr. Charlie Kern, 7795 Lui Drive, spoke generally in support of the staff's recommendations, calling the new plan a good compro- mise. He addressed the relocation of the easement at the south- east corner of the property over to the east, saying this will prevent an alley -type situation ; he also approved the gate pro- posed at that end of the project to prevent bicycle access to the walkway. Dr. Kern also discussed the architectural treatment of the buildings, buffering between the properties, relocation of the walkway, and the possibility of omitting windows and doors abutting the R1 to the south to protect the privacy of the exist- ing residents. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the proposal, and the public hearing was closed. The following items were discussed by the Commission: Public Accessway to Terry Park: The provision of this public accessway across private property was a problem for the majority of the Commission in regard to the_ incompatibility of the mix of seniors with children from the market -rate condominiums and the liability and responsibility for this public access. Alter- natives were suggested which included providing the walk on the -3- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 4 east side of the senior project with other properties in the area taking their access off the parking lot; providing the walkway on the west side of the project adjacent to or on the industrial site; using the streets for access; or actual elimination of the walkway entirely. Setbacks: Mike Adams noted an error on the submitted layout which shows an 11-foot setback in some instances; this will be changed and the minimum setback will be 15 feet. The Commission discussed the setbacks of buildings from the drives and from the adjacent residential properties. Building Footprint: Commissioner Higgins suggested that buildings on the west side of the project be reoriented'to take better advan- tage of their location relative to the park and to avoid noise from the adjacent lumber yard. Mr. Adams said other layouts had been considered and he would again look at the plan to try to reorient those structures. Separation between buildings was reviewed. Elevations: Staff is recommending that no doors or windows on either level be provided in elevations where units side -on to existing residential. After discussion, Commissioner'Porter suggested that the privacy of the R1 residents could be protected by only conditioning the second story of the subject buildings with that restriction. Easement: Secretary Patin reviewed for the staff and Commission the original intent of the easement, imposed when the property was both residential and industrial; that intent had been to maintain a way for the residents of the general neighborhood to take access to the. park after all the properties were developed. The Commission dis- cussed whether or not a legal obligation remains to honor the ease- ment, and staff was directed to research the legal ramifications of asking the City Council to vacate that easement. Security: Staff informed Commission that the total area will be secured by a gate off Talbert Avenue. The southern boundary of the subject property will be secured by a locked gate, to allow residents entrance to Terry Park but to keep the public from entering the projects through the park. Commissioner Porter discussed the difficulty in approving what staff has described as a "conceptual" layout and depending on con- ditions of approval to attain Commission objectives. The consensus developed that the Commission needed to have the layout before them as it will be built, to assure that the project they approve will address their concerns. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECONDED BY MIRJAHANGIR TO CON- TINUE THIS PROJECT TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING TO ALLOW STAFF TO MAKE NECESSARY CORRECTIONS AND INCORPORATE THE COMMISSION'S CON- CERNS INTO THE LAYOUT. -4- 5-17-83 P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 5 Staff requested further direction from the Commission. Exten- sive discussion ensued, and both Livengood and Mirjahangir agreed to withdraw their motion for continuance. A motion for a straw vote was made by Livengood in support of the walkway through the greenbelt as it is shown on the pre- sent plan. The motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Winchell, Porter, Livengood Noes: Higgins, Schumacher, Mirjahangir Dr. Kern requested permission to speak again; however, the public hearing had been closed. Commissioner Winchell asked him to address the Commission, and he indicated a strong ob- jection to having a public access in the easement adjacent to the back yards of the R1 dwellings, saying it would create an alley effect and would not solve the problem. The time frame was discussed by staff, with Secretary Palin suggesting a 30-minute tabling so that staff could perhaps work out some resolution to the stated concerns. Commissioner Schumacher asked for a straw vote on the possibility of the public accessway running along the east side of the project with one side being fenced with a solid fence and the other with open, wrought iron fencing to avoid the "alley" effect. Tom Tincher pointed out another way that access might be taken for the condominium projects to the park; this would involve using a 10-foot strip still under the ownership of Collins and Zweibel south of the shopping center out to Beach Boulevard. This would provide the necessary access for those projects and leave the interior walkway for the private use of the senior projects only. Commission direction for modifications to the project were: 1) add the conditions set forth in the Noise Study for the miti- gation of noise impacts; 2) reorient the two westernmost build- ings; 3) condition on openings in walls abutting residential; 4) show some landscaping and trees; and 5) investigate moving the walkway out of the center of the project or deleting it en- tirely. Commissioner Porter set forth four additional condi- tions he would like to see imposed on the project in regard to relocation of the wall to the eastern side of the easement, minimum separation between structures and the project boundary, elimination of doors and windows in specified locations, a decorative masonry wall along the boundary between the project and Terry Park, and a condition relating to security and gating of the project. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-9 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11955 WERE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 7, 1983, TO STUDY SUGGESTED REVISIONS, AMEND THE PLAN, AND INCLUDE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Winchell, Schumacher ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None -5- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-10 Applicant: Huntington Dance Academy To permit a dance studio in an M1 district pursuant to Section 9331 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, on property located at the southwest corner of Gothard Street and Heil Avenue. Staff planner Carol Inge presented an overview of the request, expressing staff's concerns that the percentage of non -industrial uses in this particular mixed use project might be over the amount allowed by the resolution which established the entitlement. Staff wishes to place this consideration before the Commission because it is felt that continued approval of commercial/office uses in the mixed use projects may be the beginning of a trend to- ward the erosion of the industrial and manufacturing activities which in staff's opinion offer- better employment opportunities in the City. In a brief discussion it was established that the corner building in this project, housing offices and the Mercury Savings and Loan operation, was not counted in the original percentage of mixed use because it had been in operation prior to adoption of the reso- lution, The public hearing was opened. Elizabeth Munson, property manager, addressed the Commission in sup- port of the proposed use. She distributed copies of parking alloca- tions for the project. Chris Toland of Stewart Development, owners of the property, also spoke in favor or the proposal. Sheila Hampton, operator of the dance academy, addressed the Commis- sion to describe the nature and operation of her business. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the project, and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Winchell discussed the timing of the mixed use ordin- ance and inquired why this project is apparently limited to 19 per- cent while other mixed use developments in the City are allowed 35 percent. Secretary Patin noted that perhaps the discrepancy arose because at the time this project was approved for commercial as well as industrial use the staff was trying to apply standards to an already existing project rather than working with an original dev- elopment. In response to further questioning from Ms. Winchell, he added that the project is also in violation of the amount of square footage of office/commercial allowed by code along arterials•..•in the mixed use projects. The Commission discussion included consideration of the mixed use standards, the parking within the complex, and the nature of the use proposed. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-10 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: F,�11 -6- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 7 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed dance academy is generally compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. Although 54 spaces are required by code to serve the building to be occupied by the proposed use and only 52 are available, the Commission has determined that special circumstances of the type of operation and the hours in relation to the hours of surrounding uses exist, and these circumstances demonstrate that the proposed use has adequate parking to accommodate it. 3. The proposed project meets the existing code requirement that no more than 35 percent of mixed use commercial be permitted within a mixed use project in an industrial area. 4. The proposed project does comply with four of the five re- quired standards for a mixed use development, and in regard to the fifth (which regards the restriction to only 50 percent of the original ground floor area fronting on arterials), there are unusual circumstances in view of the fact that the corner building of this project was developed as a separate office building prior to the enactment of the mixed -use ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Classes for adults on weekdays will be scheduled only after 5:00 p.m. 2. If the Director of Development Services deems it necessary be- cause of complaints received from surrounding tenants, meas- ures shall be taken, at the applicant's expense, to lower the volume of sound to a level acceptable to the Director. 3. The square footage of the dance academy shall count as util- izing a portion of the percentage of mixed uses allowed in the Gothard Business Center. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None ZONE CHANGE NOL 83-5/CODE AMENDMENT NO. 83-12/NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION NO. 83-11 Applicant: Robert J. Zinngrabe To permit a change of zone from R5, Office Professional, to Pacifica Community Plan, District One, on property located on the east side of Florida Street approximately 450 feet south of Main Street, -7- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 8 Florence Webb indicated that staff has no additional information to add at this time. The public hearing was opened on ZC 83-5, CA 83-12, and ND 83-11. Dick Harlow, representing the applicant, spoke to concur with the staff's report and make himself available to answer any questions the Commission might have. The Commission reviewed the need for the zone change and the code amendment with Mr. Harlow and staff. Florence Webb explained that the original recommendation for con- tinuance had been made to allow additional advertising for the code amendment, but that a determination had been made by the office of the City Attorney that the advertising done for the zone change was sufficient to cover the code amendment as well, and in the staff report the recommendation is for approval. There were no other persons to address the Commission in regard to these applications, and the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed the other uses in the specific plan area and the consistency of the present proposal. Ms. Webb indicated that, although all the uses presently in the Pacifica complex as well as the proposed use are permitted under the existing General Plan designation, staff now has available to it a new designation, Mixed Use, which it feels is more descriptive of the actual develop- ment of the area and a General Plan amendment is being proposed to apply that designation to the property in the future. ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION NO. 83-11 WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR•ZONE CHANGE NO. 83-5 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS: 1. The proposed zone change is substantially consistent with the General Plan. -8- 5-1 7-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 9 2. A change of: zone on the subject property from R5, Office Professional, to Pacifica Community Plan, District One, is compatible with surrounding zoning designations, which include R5, Office Professional, to the north; Pacifica Community Plan, District Two, across Florida Street to the west; and C4, Highway Commercial, to the east. With the exception of the commercial zoning to the east, each of the surrounding zon- ing designations permit land uses that are not intense and which would be compatible with the permitted land uses found in District One of the Pacifica Community Plan. The impact of the commercial property located to the east can be mitigated at the project level. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR CODE AMENDMENT NO. 83-12 WAS APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None ITEMS NOT FOR PUBLIC HEARING: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION NO. 83-2 Applicant: Brad Jones Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, To permit the extended use of a nonconforming, freestanding pole sign on property located on the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue. Mr. and Mrs. Carlos Benevenia, operators of the restaurant at the subject location, were present to represent the application. Both addressed the Commission in support of being allowed to continue the use of the sign with amended copy. They informed the Commission that they were unaware of the requirement to bring the sign up to code until after they had ordered expensive modifications to the sign,and to deny -them the use now would impose a severe economic hardship. Staff informed the Commission that the sign has been nonconforming since 1969 and that, in addition to exceeding the height and square footage limits, it also overhangs the public right-of-way by approxi- matbly 3 feet. The Commission discussed the length of the amortiza- tion period which the applicant has already enjoyed and the dollar -9- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 10 amount of his most recent investment. Commissioner Livengood in- dicated that given the investment the two years' amortization period staff is suggesting does not seem adequate and perhaps a 42-month period could be agreed to. Mr. Benevenia said he did not agree with that proposal since at the end of the time he would still be faced with the same problem. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECONDED BY PORTER THAT THE NON- CONFORMING SIGN BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED THREE AND ONE-HALF YEARS, WITH THE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. AT THE END OF THAT THREE AND ONE-HALF YEAR PERIOD, THE APPLICANT SHALL BRING THE SIGN INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE. Mr. Benevenia refused to concur with the motion, saying he wanted unlimited approval or denial. Livengood and Porter then withdrew the motion. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION NO. 83-2 WAS DENIED AND THE EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIGN DIRECTED TO BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, The applicant was advised of the appeal period and procedure by Chair- man Porter. The Commission recessed at 10:00 p.m. and reconvened at 10:10 p.m. DISCUSSION ITEMS: TENTATIVE TRACT 10853 (Revision) Applicant: Mola Development Corporation To permit the revision of a previously approved 3-lot subdivision to a 7-lot subdivision for the purpose of phasing construction on prop- erty located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street approximately 700 feet south of Warner Avenue. Secretary Palin explained the request and noted that the proposed additional conditions of approval should have the concurrence of the applicant on record. Jerry Lindquist, an engineer for Don Greek and serving as representative for Mola, addressed the Commission to say that the developer does agree with the proposed new conditions. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10853 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDI- TIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1 -10- 5-17-83 - P.C. 1 Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission April 7, 1983 Page 11 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The tentative tract received and dated May 13, 1983, shall be the approved lot line layout for Tentative Tract 10853. 2. All recreational facilities approved for the proposed project shall be constructed and in place prior to the closing of escrow on the first unit in the first phase. 3. All seven lots shall be .included within the same master home- owners' association and shall be considered one overall project with equal rights to all of the common.facilities and over all of the common streets. Prior to the closing of escrow of the last unit in the last phase, all units located within this project shall be recorded under one condominium map. 4. The approval of this revised map shall not modify or change any of the previously approved conditions of approval or the original approval date. 5. Prior to the recordation of a condominium map, a copy shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None WARNER AVENUE POST OFFICE: Winchell, Porter, Schumacher The Commission reviewed the report submitted by staff. Florence Webb indicated that the manager seems receptive to meeting with the City and trying to iron out the problems, after obtain- ing his supervisor's approval. The Commission directed that the Fire Department be included in any such meeting; staff will advise of the results. RAINBOW DISPOSAL EMPLOYEE PARKING: Staff elaborated on their report, under construction,at the present steps is normally the installation is currently in use for equipment materials HOUSING IN BARTLETT PARK: Staff report received and filed. stating that the project is time and one of the final of parking. The parking area and stockpiling of construction -11- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 12 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 83-10 (Proposed) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach This code amendment is proposed to set up new regulations for the revision of site plans approved by either the Commission or the Board of Zoning Adjustments. Brief discussion took place. ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO PREPARE THE CODE AMENDMENT AND SET IT FOR PUBLIC HEARING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None HOUSING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY-WIDE HOUSING STRATEGY Presented by City of Huntington Beach DRAFT LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Staff is recommending that both the above items be considered in a study session by the Commission. Commissioner Livengood recommended that if possible they both be scheduled for the same study session. Florence Webb, noting that the landscaping ordinance is on the agenda for the June 7, 1983 meeting, suggested that the study session could address that item at 6:00 p.m. before the meeting and then the Com- mission could adjourn to a study session after the meeting to consider the housing recommendations. The Commission concurred with this approach. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY WINCHELL THE COMMISSION SCHEDULED A STUDY SESSION FOR JUNE 7, 1983 AT 6:00 PM FOR REVIEW OF THE DRAFT LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE AND THE HOUSING COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A CITY-WIDE HOUSING STRATEGY, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - 15-YEAR TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM Staff noted that the Commission's report is available in the Planning Office for any Commissioner who wishes to read it. Staff will con- tinue to monitor activities and will attend sessions on the Beach Boulevard Corridor Study. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None 1 -12- 5-17-83 - P.C. Minutes, H.S. Planning Coltlnl qpp qn May 17, 1983 Page 13 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEMS; Secretary Palin briefly reviewed the actions taken at the City Council meeting of May 16, 1983, for the Commission's informa- tion. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The Commission noted receipt from the office of the City Attorney of the requested information in regard to what should be trans- mitted to the City Council when the Planning Commission has approved for recommendation only certain portions of a proposed action for a specific plan. Planning Commissioner Livengood informed the Commission that there is a workshop on transportation taking place at UCI; Com- missioner Mirjahangir indicated that he will be attending this workshop on June 11, 1983. ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY HIGGINS THE COMMISSION AD- JOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON JUNE 7, 1983 AT 6:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None Marcus M. Porter, man -13- 5-17-83 - P.C.