Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-05-25MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, WEDNESDAY, MAY 25, 1983 - 1:30 P.M. Center CA BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith MINUTES: ON MOTION BY COOPER AND SECOND BY SMITH, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 11, 1983, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-23 Applicant: M. Petyo & Associates, Inc. To permit: 1) consolidation of two parcels into one parcel for a four (4) unit apartment building and 2) remove Lot "A" (recreation purposes only) stipulation set forth on map of Tract 4026 containing the two lots. Property located at 7631 Commodore Circle. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that the proposed project is located within a Redevelopment Project Area involving the Neighbor- hood Enhancement Program. As they have concerns and wish to comment on the parcel map they are requesting, with the applicant's approval, that the Board continue this item for one (1) week to allow them additional them to respond to this matter. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY COOPER, WITH THE APPLICANT'S APPROVAL, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-561 WAS CONTINUED ONE (1) WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JUNE 1, 1983,•BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Two REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-10 In Conjunction With (Con't. from 5/18/83) USE PERMIT NO. 83-25 Applicant: Enterprise Rent-A-Car C.E. Request: To permit a reduction in landscaping from the Code required landscaping and to allow an encroachment into the required sight angle and front yard setback. U.P. Request: To permit the construction of an 863 square foot build- ing in conjunction with a car rental agency. Property located at 17090 Beach Boulevard. Acting Chairman Evans introduced both applications. Secretary Godfrey reiterated the reason for continuance of both applications stating that as staff had suggested a slightly amended plan allowing additional landscaping across the front portion of Beach Boulevard, relocation of the structure to the north eliminatin encroachment into the sight angle setback allowing only a slight encroachment into the front yard setback and use of a reciprocal driveway in lieu of the two driveways presently existing on Beach Boulevard, a one (1) week continuance was to allow the applicant time to review the extensive conditions and prepare any response to the Board. The public hearing was opened on both applications by Acting Chairman Evans. Dave Willey, of Enterprise Rent-A-Car, addressed the Board. He stated that he did not fully understand why the amended plan eliminated the wing wall. He was informed that primarily it's an architectural feature encroaching into the setback area and that additional landscaping across the front of the property is being requested as a trade-off for the encroachment of the main structure into the setback area. Further, that by moving the building back farther on the north it will not encroach into the sight angle. Mr. Willey, lessee of the property, stated he felt very strongly that nine (9) ft. of landscaping on Beach Boulevard on a forty-six (46) ft. in depth lot was too much; that the three (3) foot landscape planter indicated on his plan should have been sufficient and asked that the Board reconsider this condition. Discussion carried between the Board and the applicant with the outcome that a six (6) ft. planter area across the front property line was felt to be a fair compromise. Mr. Dick Sass and Mr. Donald Walsh, property owners, speaking for the Warner Beach Company, were present and addressed the Board. They were not pleased with the condition to enter into an irrevocable -2- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Three j offer to dedicate property in accord with the ultimate right-of- way with corner return radius required for Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard. They were informed that presently the City is doing.an EIR for widening of Warner Avenue which is now a four lane highway to ultimately a six lane highway and that in this particular location land on the south side of the street will be affected at some future time creating the necessity for this dedication. The property owners explained that on the property presently exists a•car wash and that both driveways are necessary in lieu of a reciprocal driveway suggested by the Board. The Board reviewed the location of the car wash, the gas pumps, stacking area for cars, etc. and concurred with the property owners that the two driveways should remain but be modified. The necessity for a tentative parcel map to consolidate the twelve existing parcels into two parcels along the frontage of Beach Boulevard between Blaylock and Warner Avenue was explained to all concerned. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-10 AND USE PERMIT NO. 83-25 WERE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-10 FINDINGS: 1. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not constitute a grant of a special privilege inasmuch as the subject property is located within a vestigial parcel of a narrow width created by the taking of right-of-way for Beach Boulevard. 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties within this zoning classification along Beach Boulevard. 3. This parcel is consistent with what exists within the neighbor- hood. 4. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. That the amended plan, as submitted by staff, shall be the conceptually approved layout. This includes additional land- scaping (with six (6) ft. of landscaping adjacent to the parking -3- BZA 5/25/83 i Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Four area), parking configuration and relocation of the proposed structure so as to minimize the extent and nature of the encroachment. 2. That all requirements of Use Permit No. 83-25 be complied with. USE PERMIT NO. 83-25 FINDINGS: 1. The construction as proposed will not be detrimental to the welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. 2. The construction as proposed will not be detrimental to property and improvements in the vicinity. 3. The granting of a Use Permit will not affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. That the amended plan, as submitted by staff, shall be the conceptually approved layout., This includes additional land- scaping (with six (6) ft. of landscaping adjacent to the parking area), parking configuration and relocation of the proposed structure -so as to minimize the extent and nature of the encroachment. 2. That all requirements of Conditional Exception No. 83-10 be complied with. 3. A tentative parcel map shall be filed consolidating the existing parcels along the frontage of Beach Boulevard between Blaylock and Warner Avenue and a subdivision of that consolidated parcel into two parcels to reflect the lease/ownership lines as they will be established. [1 1 4. That the owner(s) of the property shall enter into an irrevocable offer to dedicate property in accord with the ultimate right- of-way with corner return radius required for Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard. 5. That the existing driveway/alley approach on the west at Blaylock Drive be redesigned and constructed in accordance with alley approach standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 6. That a landscape and irrigation plan be submitted in accordance with the amended layout (complying with Article 979 of the H.B. Ordinance Code) and approved by the departments of Public Works and'Development Services. Landscaping shall be installed prior -4- BZA 5/25/83 P I I Minutes; H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Five to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. The elevations submitted April 25, 1983 shall be the conceptually approved elevations with the exception that the wing wall on the building's southwest corner shall be eliminated. 8. That the existing sign be brought into conformance with the -City's Sign Code. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: Cooper The appeal process was explained to all concerned. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-6 Applicant:' Susan M.•Presley .• To permit a reduction in parking stall size from 19 ft. to 17 ft. 6 inches. Property located at 7622 Juliette Low Drive. Acting Chairman Evans informed the Board Members that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that a permit was issued on this property to construct a 2nd-story addition over an attached garage. In the field, it was determined that the plans erroneously identified a dimension in the garage space delineated on the approved plans. After construction started the inspector discovered the error and stopped the job; the true dimension meant that the stairs encroach- ment into the space for vehicle storage would reduce that space below the minimum required in the Code, by established•policy and by Board precedent. Further, that if this request is approved it will reduce the size of the garage and consequently reduce the space of one (1) parking stall; a small compact car dimension of the two provided. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Susan M. Presley, applicant, addressed the Board and stated that she hired a contractor for the work and made the mistake of paying all but $2,000.00 in advance. The same contractor has since informed her that she will have to pay him another $10,000.00 before he can complete the job as he has run out of money. The job was to have been completed by December 24, 1982. She stated that she does not have money to retain a lawyer but she is working with the Depart- ment of Consumer Affairs. The public hearing was closed. -5- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Six Discussion carried between the Board and the applicant in regard i, to enclosure of the stairway, proper fire protection, etc, meeting ` the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. It was the consensus of most of the Board Members that as the applicant's garage would accommodate a compact or medium size vehicle in one of the parking stalls, with the other stall providing space for a larger car, that due to the sequence of events leading up to this request, practical difficulties did exist justifying granting of this request. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY COOPER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-6 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS: 1. The granting of this Conditional Exception under existing conditions will not constitute a grant of a special privilege inasmuch as the subject property would be deprived of a privilege normally enjoyed in the R-1 District. That because of the front yard setback provided, the parking on the driveway area would be adequate to allow the parking of a vehicle with adequate space to open the garage door. 2. The granting of the Conditional Exception would not constitute a grant of special privilege which is inconsistent with normal limitations in the R-1 District. 3. The Conditional Exception is necessary for the preservation of one or more substantial property rights in that there was a permit issued albeit with an error in dimensions and sub- stantial construction has been completed. 4. Granting of the Conditional Exception is not materially detrimental to adjacent properties. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received and dated March 31, 1983, shall be the approved layout. 2. That the plans be corrected and be approved to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 3. That the habitable portion of the addition shall not be used as a rental and that an Agreement shall be submitted and approve by the Secretary of the Board and recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office to assure this requirement. -6- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Seven l AYES: Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: Godfrey ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-15 Applicant: Mr. Frank J. Karoleski To permit a reduction in open space. Property located at 21121 Red Jacket Circle. The Acting Chairman introduced the application and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that the applicant's lot is irregularly shaped adjacent to a school on the end of a cul-de-sac. There is existing a one-story family dwelling with attached double -car garage on the property. There currently exists 1,420 square feet of rear yard open space. The applicant is proposing an addition consisting of a master bedroom and a bathroom. This addition would encroach into the required rear yard open space reducing it to 750 square feet. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. Karoleski, applicant, addressed the Board. He stated that in addition to the open space provided living adjacent to the school yard he has a twenty-one (21) foot front yard setback and felt that more than adequate open space for recreational activities is available meeting the intent of the Ordinance Code. The public hearing was closed. It was the opinion of all of the Board Members that open space provided adjacent to the westerly lot line adjacent to the school yard should be considered as a trade-off for open space in the applicant's rear yard granting parity with other applications approved by the Board. ON MOTION BY COOPER AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-15 WAS APPROVED, WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS: 1. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity and under same zone classification. The Board has acted in the past on identical situations allowing an encroach- ment of room additions into the rear yard utilizing side yards -7- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Eight adjacent to.school yards as trade-off for open space encroached upon. 2. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including its shape and location, the strict application of the zoning ordinance will deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 3. The granting of the Conditional Exception would preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. That the plot plan and elevations received May 5, 1983 be the approved layout. 2. That the room addition be architecturally treated so as to be compatible in color and surface texture with the existing structure. 3. That the side yard used in trade for the rear yard encroachment be used for active or passive outdoor activities only. AYES: Smith, Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Godfrey NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-16 Applicant: Mr. Donald K. Genet To permit a 18 sq. ft.+ encroachment into the required open space. Property located at 6751 Via Angelina. Acting Chairman Evans stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey explained that the applicant's request, due to the irregular shape of his lot,"would create a corner encroachment of three feet into his required open space dimension. Further, if the applicant's lot were the same size as other lots within his subdivision, a Conditional Exception would not be required. -8- BZA 5/25/83 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Nine The public hearing was opened. Speaking in favor of granting the request was the applicant, Mr. Donald Genet. He informed the Board that not only is his lot shorter in width but also in length than others within his subdivision. He felt his proposed addition would not impact his neighborhood but would afford him the same privileges as allowed to other homes in his area. Thew being no one else present to speak in favor or opposition of the applicant's request, the public hearing was closed. The Board discussed the site plan taking into consideration the magnitude of the encroachment felt to be minimal, possibility of other alternatives, and the mandatory finding of hardship necessary for granting this request. It was felt that the addition would not set a precedent and -was in keeping with the intent of the Ordinance Code. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-16 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS: 1. The granting of this Conditional Exception will not constitute a grant of a special privilege inasmuch as the subject property is substandard in width and length (94.75 square feet). Other lots in the applicant's subdivision are 100 square feet in depth. 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the subdivision. To wit, if the addition were contemplated on a lot of normal depth (100 sq. ft.) the addition would not have required a conditional exception. 3. The proposal to construct an addition to an existing dwelling would be consistent with what exists throughout the neighborhood. 4. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The conceptual plan and elevations received and dated May 12, 1983 shall be the approved layout. General Condition: 1. The room addition shall be architecturally treated so as to be compatible in color and surface texture with the existing -9- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Ten structure. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Vogelsang, Evans, Cooper NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 83-22 Applicant: Mr. Craig B. Carstens To permit enclosure of existing carport along existing setback lines and addition to a residential building with non -conforming setbacks. Property located at 601 - 19th Street The Acting Chairman stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that the applicant's property contains two residential units; a two-story structure, a two -car garage and a carport. Structures on the lot were created in conformance with Code requirements existing at time of construction. Because Code changes have taken place, the structures are now legally non -conforming due to substandard setbacks. The Board Members were informed that the Ordinance allows an addition to an existing legal non -conforming structure upon approval of a Use Permit application approved by the Board. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. Carstens introduced himself to the Board and stated that by enclosing the existing carport he would be provided with a hobby room. He is also proposing new sidewalks, curbs and gutters and felt his proposal would not only serve his needs but would enhance his neighborhood. There being no one else present wishing to speak on the applicant's proposal, the public hearing was closed. The Board reviewed the applicant's plan and explained the necessity of dedication for the alley and the corner return right-of-way. It was the feeling of all of the Board Members that the proposed plan was in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Ordinance Code in addition to being compatible with its surroundings. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, USE PERMIT NO. 83-22 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS: 1. The construction as proposed will not be detrimental to the -10- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Eleven general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor be detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed construction. 2. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. That the plot plan and elevations submitted May 2, 1983 be the conceptually approved plans. 2. Two and one-half (2-1/2) ft. of alley shall be dedicated to the City by the property owner on a form approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for the corner return right- of-way shall be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. That the addition be architecturally compatible in color and texture treatment to the existing structure. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vogelsang, Cooper NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 83-32 Applicant: Anna Marie Wood To permit a Home Occupation to teach swimming. Locat�oB at 5912 Lourdes Drive. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the Use Permit and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environ- mental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey commented that a home occupation to give swimming instruction in an outdoor swimming pool shall be subject to approval of a Use Permit by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. Each swimming class shall be limited to four (4) students to allow the instructor to maintain complete control of the environment as well as the students. Further, that classes are to be held during normal working hours - Monday through Friday. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mrs. Wood informed the Board that she is proposing to teach private swimming instruction on a "one teacher - one student" basis which would lend itself to a quiet teaching situation allowing use of -11- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Twelve her driveway providing for off-street parking. The use will not affect the safety of neighbors or their children as the pool is surrounded and secured with lock and key by a six (6) foot high brick fence; and will provide a community service by helping children and adults to become water safe. Thexe being no one else present to speak in favor or opposition of the applicant's request, the public hearing was closed. Conditions for approval and precautionary measures were reviewed with the applicant. ON MOTION BY VOGELSANG AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 83-32 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS: 1. The use will not be detrimental to persons living or working in the vicinity in that the number of students and days of use will be limited. 2. The use will not be injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity. 3. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The plot plan received and dated May 9, 1983 shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: 1. That the applicant be certified in CPR. 2. No more than two (2) guest vehicles shall be used to transport students to classes at any one time. 3. The appearance of the dwelling shall not be altered by color, materials, lighting, windows, signs or other means so that the dwelling might not be reasonably recognized as other than a residential use. 4. The applicant shall furnish evidence of liability insurance conditioned that the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees from any and all loss, costs, damages, expenses or liability which may arise out of or result from the granting of the permit or the conduct of the activity for which the Use Permit is - issued, and all loss or damage that may be sustained by any person as a result of, or which may be cause by or arise out of the conduct of the activity for which the permit is Issued. Such policy of insurance shall be written by an -12- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Thirteen insurance company acceptable to the City as required by Resolution No. 4337 to the satisfaction and approval of the Risk Manager of the City of Huntington Beach. 5. Approval from the County Health Department shall be received by the applicant. - 6. The applicant shall be in receipt of a lifesaving and swimming instructor's certificate from a recognized school. 7. The City shall be in receipt of a letter from the property owner granting the applicant permission to teach swimming. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None MISCELLANEOUS ITEM: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-23 Applicant: Mills Land and Water Company To permit use of the approx. 3-acre parcel as a seasonal parking lot from May 28, 1983 to September 5, 1983. Property located on Newland Street - south of OCFCD - west side of street. Secretary Godfrey outlined the suggested Conditions of Approval for discussion informing the Board Members that the purpose of the proposed parking lot is to provide a controlled facility for beach visitor parking this summer by the applicant in an effort to resolve the problems and complaints which have resulted from the previous unsupervised use of the site by beachgoers. Mr. Robert Moore, Jr., Property Manager, addressed the Board. He stated that the proposed seasonal parking lot will help to fill a much -needed demand for orderly parking for patrons of Huntington State Beach. Further, that it is anticipated that the demand will be particularly acute this summer given the unavailability of a large number of State Beach parking spaces because of the current renovation taking place in that facility. Mr. Moore stated that in 1982 the Edison lot (operated by the Parking Company of America) was not large enough to handle the summer demand for beach parking; as a result, the subject Mills parcel on Newland Street was filled with unauthorized vehicles parked in a haphazard manner. This "free- for-all" generated a number of problems and complaints, many of which involved the Huntington Beach Police Department. Mr. Moore stated that Mills believes that these problems can be satisfactorily resolved by means of the proposed seasonal parking lot for the property which will be operated in an orderly manner. Board discussion ensued covering points of concern. -13- BZA 5/25/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Fourteen ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY COOPER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-23 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS: 1. As the applicant's request is for a seasonal parking lot, .it's found to be a hardship to require permanent improvements for a "temporary use". 2. As the subject use is temporary, the site shall be returned to its original condition after September 5, 1983; therefore, the granting of this application will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the same zone classification or in the vicinity. 3. Granting of this application will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan received May -18, 1983 shall be the approved layout. Directional signs are to be posted clearly indicating access location on Newland Street. 2. Locations for driveway, approach, and parking attendant shall be installed to the satisfaction of the departments of Public Works and the Fire Department. Said approval shall be obtained ten (10) days prior to opening of the seasonal parking lot. A diagonal parking layout to increase parking and control circulation shall be considered. Striping shall be approved by the Fire & Public Works Departments. 3. Surfacing and/or oiling of the parking lot shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 4. Inspection of the site to assure that all Conditions imposed are met shall be made prior to issuance of permits or license by a Land Use Enforcement Officer prior to opening of the lot for public purposes. 5. Pedestrian access shall be controlled by the installation of poles and cable, with cable identified by tie -on flagging around the unsecured portion of the parking lot except for the entrance on Newland Street to the satisfaction of Public Works. 6. All litter on the property shall be picked up and bagged daily. Bagged litter shall be disposed of weekly, or more frequently if determined necessary by Land Use Enforcement. 7. No signs, swags, cables, post -signs, etc. shall be allowed in the public right-of-way. -14- BZA 5/25/83 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 25, 1983 Page Fifteen AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Cooper, Vogelsang, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. Glen K. God fr y, Secret ry Board of Zoning Adjus ents -15- BZA 5/25/83