Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-07-06 (6)MINUTES HUNTINGTON-BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, JULY 6, 1983 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Lipps, Vincent MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1983, WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Smith, Godfrey, Evans NOES: None ABSTAIN: Lipps, Vincent REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-19 (Continued from 6/29/83) In Conjunction With ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-28 Applicant: Tiodize Company, Inc. C.E. Request: To permit 1) a reduction of 23 parking spaces and 2) a 23 ft. encroachment into the required rear yard setback. A.R. Request: To permit a 6,200 sq. ft. addition/expansion to an existing 51,840 sq. ft. building. Chairman Evans introduced the applications and stated that the Con- ditional Exception is Class. 5 and the Administrative Review is Class. 3, both Categorically Exempt under the California Environmen- tal Quality Act, 1970. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Two Subject property is located at 15272 Tiodize Circle (approximately 250 ft. from Argosy) - Huntington Beach Industrial Park. Secretary Godfrey informed all concerned that both applications were continued from the June 29, 1983 meeting to meet legal re- quirements for advertising. The 23 ft. encroachment into the re- quired rear yard setback was inadvertently not advertised. Mr. Godfrey stated the Staff has received a number of petitions (total of 32) along with a letter received prior to today's hearing from residents of the Bolsa Park Residential Development located south of the Tiodize Company requesting that the following list of objections be given full and immediate consideration: 1. The proposed encroachment to the rear yard setback be denied as no other adjacent building has this encroachment. 2. The use,handling and storage of exotic, toxic and volatile chemicals in this proximity to private residents not be allowed for obvious reasons. 3. The accompanying noise pollution generated by pumps and air handling equipment would be an outright invasion of the privacy and lives of the residents. 4. The severe decrease in property values due to this type of oc- cupancy being permitted adjacent to a private home. 5. The current discomfort and loss of tranquility would be an experience due to outside building security lights glaring into the neighboring homes. The unsightly smoke stacks and vents rearing up over back yards. 6. The unsightly make -do fencing, applied without concern to all the backyards, by the building owners. The total disregard for the general aesthetics of the neighborhood. 7. The current traffic problems, generated by the industrial park, have never been resolved and any increase in activity by Tiodize Company will aggravate the situation. 8. It appears that the approval of this conditional exception would be completely at the expense of the homeowners, both financially and personally. It serves no useful purpose to the City of Huntington Beach, generates no new revenues, creates ill -will between homeowners and the City Government elected to serve, and provides only for the enrichment of Tiodize through self-serv- ing manipulation of City regulations, -2- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Three 9. That an environmental impact statement from Tiodize Company be provided prior to any thought of the granting of the expansion. Secretary Godfrey explained that the Code requires approval of an ad- ministrative review application for an expansion in the M1-A Zoning District and that the conditional exception is for a variance request- ing an encroachment of 23 ft. in lieu of 45 ft. into the rear setback between residential property and the subject industrial property plus a reduction of 23 parking spaces. Mr. Godfrey informed all of the Board Members of Code requirements necessary to act favorably on ap- plications located within a limited industrial district. Mr. Godfrey stated that Staff not only had concerns with the reduc- tion of parking spaces but, additionally, with the location of a waste treatment system, scrubber, and electrical transformer pad with such close proximity to the residential development. He outlined staff's suggested reasons for denial. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. Thomas R. Adams, President of Tiodize Company, Inc., addressed the Board. He stated they had not as yet moved into the building. They are presently located on Research Avenue at an industrial park located in Huntington Beach. He said it is necessary for them to move to larger quarters to meet the pollution,,control regiiirements�df the EPA. The project will cost them $2,000,000 to have a clean oper- ation to prevent the emission of any pollutants into the air. Further, that they are not actually trying to expand their business perse but need the space for equipment as required by the EPA for their plating business. He said that they have less employees than any other in- dustrial building within the park and that by the elimination of 23 parking spaces along the rear of the property would attenuate noise to the residential property. He informed everyone that the type of chemicals they use are far less hazardous than what presently exists in the park. He stated that storage of sulfuric acid, etc. was stored in a pit and should the drums leak could not escape the pit. Jack Scholation, one of the builders for the industrial park, ad- dressed the Board. He stated that when the industrial park was built, as they did not know who would be the tenants, excessive park- ing requirements were imposed throughout the park and that the park- ing on the subject site was far in excess required for use by Tiodize. He agreed that inadequate circulation to accommodate the Fire Depart- ment in the rear of the building would exist,that around the building fire hydrants were provided with the building being water sprinklered. -3- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Four Mr. Adams stated that another plating facility exists (largest in Orange County) in the Huntington Beach Industrial Park called Weiser. Further, that K acor located on Chemical Lane has located on their property a highly flammable tank. Joseph E. Du Ermit, 5111 Tasman Drive, addressed the Board stating that he would speak for all of the people present in opposition of the application. He stated that the residents of the Bolsa park Tract immediately adjacent to the structure occupied by Tiodize Com- pany of 15272 Tiodize Circle are highly fearful of the proposed - expansion plans as revealed at the subject site. In light of cur- rent events both national and local, involving people being exposed to hazardous chemicals unknowningly, they fear for their lives and that of their loved ones; and cannot streps enough ob'@ctions o t o er- ation. National Fire Protection Association statistics snow ��Sat.1 as a way of business, chemical operations are normally beset by spills, seepage, explosions, and fires due to equipment failures or poorly trained operating personnel. Douglas E. Lawrie, 5161 Tasman Drive, addresed the Board and stated that three years after the residential tract was built, prior to the construction of the industrial tract, there was to have been instal- led a road separating the residential tract and the industrial devel- opment which is presently encroached upon by a wall. Mr. Rudy Brabrich, Robert Willey, Jerry Zimmar, Ella Wilson and. Leonard Wilson, Mr. Mc Mahan, and Earle Syversrud addressed the Board in opposition of the applications stating similar concerns as expres- sed by Mr. Du Ermit. As there was no else present wishing to speak in favor or opposition of the applications,the Public Hearing was closed. Board discussion carried covering necessary Code requirements, ac- commodation for Fire Department equipment should their services be necessary, and requested encroachment for equipment necessary for pollution control. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, 83-19 IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADMINISTRATIVE DENIED WITH REASONS AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-19 In Conjunction With ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-28 REASONS FOR DENIAL: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. REVIEW NO. 83-28, WERE 1. Because of inadequate circulation to accommodate the Fire Depart- ment the granting of the conditional exception will be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 1 -4- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Five 2. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings, or premises that do not apply generally to the property or class of uses in the same district. 3. There are no demonstrated special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, loca- tion or surroundings. 4. Due to the inadequate setback for the proposed waste treatment system from the residential property to the south, a potential nuisance from noise and odor exists. NOES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Lipps, Vincent The appeal process was explained to the applicant. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-21 Applicant: SKS Associates Subject property is located at 16912 Bolsa Chica Road (approximately 145 feet east of Warner Avenue)., The request is for the reduction of six parking spaces. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the conditional exception stating that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that the proposed development will be an immediate "medical care facility". The facility will, provide con- venient prompt medical care to patients in a relatively short time period after arrival. The request is for a reduction in the required parking - 66 spaces to 60 spaces as will be provided for this development in the adjacent existing retail development. The Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Basil Bailey, authorized agent and Sidney Crosley, property owners informed the Board that the immediate care centers philosophy is to provide convenient, prompt medical care of high quality in addition to health related information to anyone presenting themselves to the center regardless of race, creed, or color. The center will attempt to see each patient within fifteen minutes, and further, will have the patient ready to leave in as short a time as possible after arrival. If this goal cannot be met due to circumstances that are inherited in providing on schedule urgent care (and thus are beyond their control), center staff will inform the patient of the revised time frame. -5- BZA 7/06/83 ti Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Six The immediate medical care center is an offsite, Out Patient Depart- ment of Long Beach Community Hospital, a subsidiary corporation of Long Beach Community Health Care Corporation. The center provides immediate medical care for minor illness and injury on a walk-in'basis. Treatment is given, and a diagnosis made within the abilities of the center. When necessary, patients are referred to their primary care physician or specialist for further diagnosis and treatment. If the patient does not have an appropriate physician, the patient is referred to one by the center. A referral panel of primary physicians and specialists who are members of the medical staff at Long Beach Community Hospital is maintained for this purpose. The center does not fill prescriptions but refers patients to local pharmacies. There being no one else present wishing to speak, the Public Hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Evans. The applicants plans were reviewed.by the Board. It was noted that the first floor level was for the proposed medical care center with the second floor level for office space. It was stated that an in- spection of property was made by Staff and it was found that the in- tensity would not be adversely affected by the reduction of six park- ing spaces; that possibly the existing retail facilities within the center would benefit by the additional foot traffic provided them with the new medical care facility. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-21, WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-21 FINDINGS: 1. The granting of this conditional exception does not constitute a grant of special privilege inasmuch as the subject property in conjunction with the existing uses will be taking advantage of high turnover and use jointly with other activities not having same parking at the same time. 2. Because of the shape of the development in relation to the existing development, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privi- leges enjoyed by other properties in this zone. -6- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Seven 3. The granting of the conditional exception is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not be mater- ially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to pro- perty in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The plot plan received June 27, 1983 shall be the approved layout. 2. Detailed elevations, parking layout, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Depart- ments of Development Services and Public Works prior to issu- ance of building permits in accordance with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3. Driveway approaches, location and design width shall be ap- proved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The proposed building shall be constructed so as to be archi- tecturally compatible in design, character and building mater- ials with other buildings in the vicinity. 5. The architectural treatment proposed shall be approved by the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of build- ing permits. 6. The second -story uses proposed in the new structure shall be limited to office "non -medical." 7. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened in accor- dance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and approved by the Department of Development Services prior to final inspection. 8. Fire lane curbs shall be painted "red." AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: Lipps ABSTAIN: None -7- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Eight CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-22 Applicant: Ralph R. Haney To permit a four (4) ft.'four (4) inch encroachment into the ten (10) ft. exterior side yard. Property located at 20882 Beachwood Lane (northeast corner of Beachwood and Ski Harbor). Acting Chairman Evans stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that some concerns on the part of Staff were that this encroachment into the exterior side yard was quite severe; that the applicants exterior side yard set- back was intended to serve as an open area on his corner -lot. Further, that exceptional circumstances required by the Ordinance Code allowing the Board to adt favorably do not apply. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. There being no one present to speak in favor or oppostion of the applicants request, the Public Hearing was closed. It was stated that the tracts original CC and R's required a fifteen (15) foot exterior side yard setback but through the granting of a variance (No. 80-18) a ten (10) foot exterior side yard setback was provided throughout the tract. It was felt by most of the Board Members that as the applicant was not present to plead his hardship a one week continuance should be afforded to Mr. Haney. ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-22, WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JULY 13, 1983 BY VOTE AS FOLLOWS: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Lipps, Vincent NOES: Evans ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-27 In Conjunction With ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-35 Applicant: Douglas Matthews C.E. Request - To permit a two (2) foot side yard. A.R. Request - To permit a single foot encroachment into five (5) family dwelling within Townlot Area. I -8- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Nine Subject property is located at 306 - 6th Street (east side of street). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that the conditional exception is Class. 1 and that the administrative review is a Class. 5, both Categorically Exempt under the California En-. vironmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that this request in•--- volves a twenty-five (25) foot parcel zoned R-4 which is adjacent to the Townlot Specific Plan. The setback requirements are less strin- gent in the Townlot Specific Plan than in the R-4 district. Other requirements, such as, open space recreation area exceed the R-4 standards and meet those standards required in -the Townlot Specific Plan. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. Matthews addressed the Board and stated that he wishes to build a two-story single family dwelling on'his twenty-five (25) foot va- cant parcel within the Townlot Area. He felt that should the Board grant his request for the two (2) foot encroachment into one of'his side yards,in lieu of a five (5) foot side yard setbac]_� parity would be granted with the other homes in his immediate vicinity. The,Public Hearing was closed. Upon 'review of the applicant's plan it was noted that as there is an area adjacent to the rear property line fire access (if required) to the front and rear of the applicants proposed dwelling would not be a problem. Concern was expressed with regard to all homes in the Townlot area having three (3) foot side yards should fire services be required. Board discussion carried on necessary uniform building code require- ments, relationship of the structures to -the site and surroundings, open space, and recreation space. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-27 IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-35, WERE APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-27 In Conjunction With ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-35 FINDINGS FOR C.E. NO. 83-27: 1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other properties -9- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Ten in the vicinity. Due to the fact that the subject property is within the immediate vicinity of the Townlot Specific Plan Area, the granting of the two (2) ft. encroachment into the sideyard (net three (3) ft. sideyard setback) would not be inconsistent with the neighborhood. 2. The granting of the conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. Because the property is zoned R-4 and is only 25 ft. in width, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the immediate vicinity. 4. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR C.E. NO. 83-27 AND A.R. NO. 83-35: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received and dated June 20, 1983 shall be the approved layout. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Lipps, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 In Conjunction With USE PERMIT NO. 83-39 Applicants• John Kavanagh •& Mike Whitney C.E. Request - To permit reduction in driveway width along side of building. U.P. Request - To permit a 1,809 sq. ft. addition to a building. Property located at 16800 Beach Boulevard (west/flood channel). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applications and stated that both requests are Class. 5, Categorically Exempt of the California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that due to the fact that the subject parcel is substandard in size, the proposed use has inade- quate circulation in parking for an automotive related use. -10- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Eleven The Public Hearing was opened and closed as there was no one present to speak in favor or opposition of the applications.' It was the desire of all of the Board Members to continue Conditional Exception No. 83-28 and Use Permit No.-83-39 for one week,to the meet- ing of July 13, 1983,to allow the applicants an opportunity to be present. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 AND USE PERMIT NO. 83-29, WERE CONTINUED ONE WEEK TO THE MEET- ING OF JULY 13; 1983 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Lipps, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-29 Applicant: Richard E, Shanks Subject property is located at 4891 Maui Circle (north side of street). To permit a one -foot eight -inch reduction in driveway approach. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the application informing all concerned that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environ- mental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey briefly outlined the applicant's request. He stated that the applicant's tract was constructed under the previous standard when the code setback requirement for front -on garage was at twenty foot in lieu of our current code requirement of twenty-two feet. The appli- cant's home was built'with a side entry garage and the applicant wishes to change the garage door to a front entry providing a twenty foot four inch setback. The Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Shanks addressed the Board stating that he felt by the proposed change to his garage he would gain better access while at the same time establishing a new front yard area increasing the aesthetical appearance of the neighborhood. The Public Hearing was closed. Board discussion insued. It was the consensus of all of the Board Members that by granting the one -foot eight -inch reduction in drive- way approach would not only allow the applicant parity with his neighbors but would allow architectural compatibility staying con- sistent with original construction in the applicants subdivision. -11- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Twelve ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-29, WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-29 FINDINGS: 1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other proper- ties in the vicinity. Subject property is located within a subdivision in which all front entry garages are constructed at a twenty,foot setback. 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity. 3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not be mater- ially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to pro- perty in the same zone classification. Proposal to convert an existing side entry garage into a front entry garage to a twenty -foot four -inch setback would be consistent with what exists throughout the neighborhood. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received and dated June 24, 1983 shall be the approved layout. 2. All improvements in public right-of-way shall meet the require- ments of the Public Works Department. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Lipps, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -12- BZA 7/06/83 [I P� L1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Thirteen USE PERMIT NO. 83-38 Applicant: Siegfred I•. Surber To permit C-2 uses in a C-4 zone. Property located at 17552 Beach Boulevard (one-half block south of Slater). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applicant's request and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that the applicant is proposing to expand the type of use within the commercial center from C-4 which is rather restrictive. He wishes to open to retail uses. This par- ticular request would incorporate, if approved, all uses in the C-2 district into this particular commercial center providing a blanket use. Mr. Godfrey distributed to the Board Members copies of Section 9430.2 through .5 showing permitted retail uses for the Boards consideration. It was stated that parking would be adequate. He explained the pos- sibility of having each "occupancy" reviewed and approved by the Department of Development Services. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Don Wells, Broker from Newport Beach, representing Dr. Surber, intro- duced himself to the Board. He cited examples of C-2 uses on Beach Boulevard. He stated that for economic reasons by having the use changed to C-2 it would eliminate the necessity for each possible re- tail tenant to apply for a variance when interested in leasing one of the units. The Public Hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Evans. Board discussion insued. Board Member Smith recalled a recent ap- plication approved by the Board of Zoning within this particular commercial center wherein tool supply was approved with strict con- ditions imposed due to the location adjacent to a medical building wherein a doctor appeared before the Board stating his opposition of the use. Board Member Smith was not in favor of mixed uses at this particular area and motion for denial of Use Permit No. 83-38 pro- viding consideration to the adjacent medical facility. THE MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Smith, Evans NOES: Godfrey, Lipps, Vincent ABSTAIN: None Discussion carried on approving specific type of occupancies within the commercial center. -13- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Fourteen ON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY LIPPS, USE PERMIT NO. 83-38, WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOLLOWING, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: USE PERMIT NO. 83-38 FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of retail uses on the subject property will not be detrimental to: a. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and elevations received June 16, 1983, shall be the approved layout, subject to the following: a. All future retail uses on the subject site shall comply, with Article 979 parking standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. b. Each new "occupancy" shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Development Services to assure that the use will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. c. Restricted uses within the commercial center are: 1. Motorcycle dealers. 2. Cafes and restaurants. 3. Electric distribution, substations. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Lipps, Vincent NOES: Smith ABSTAIN: None MISCELLANEOUS ITEM: USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-32 Applicants: Marc & Teri Wilson EXTENSION OF TIME - USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 - To permit an addition to a conforming single family dwelling. C.E. NO. 82-32 - To permit a direct entry garage setback of four (4) ft. in lieu of twenty-two (22) ft. 1 -14- BZA 7/06/83 Minutes: H.A. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 6, 1983 Page Fifteen Subject property located at 1019 Huntington Street (west side of street) . Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that he was in receipt of a request for an "extension of time" for both applications which will expire on July 7, 1983. He explained that as there is no pro- vision in the Code for an extension of time on a conditional excep- tion application. A new conditional exception (No. 83-33) was issued to the applicant's with no change in request. As the applicants are pending receipt of revised plans incorporating conditions imposed on the use permit by the Board of Zoning and as the new conditional exception requires advertising, Staff is asking that Use Permit No. 82-20 Extension of Time to be heard in conjunc- tion with the new Conditional Exception (No. 83-33) be set for hear- ing at the July 20 Board of Zoning Meeting. ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 (TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-33) WAS CONTINUED FOR TWO WEEKS, TO THE JULY 20, 1983 MEETING BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Lipps, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. &�(a4 Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments -15- BZA 7/06/83