Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-07-13MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 1983 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Lipps, Vincent MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 22, 1983, WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Smith, Evans, Godfrey NOES: None ABSTAIN: Lipps, Vincent REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL*EXCEPTION NO. 83-22 (Continued from 7/06/83) Applicant: Ralph R.' Haney To permit a four (4) foot four (4) inch encroachment into ten (10) foot exterior side yard. Property located at 20882 Beachwood Lane (northeast corner of Beachwood and Ski Harbor). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members of Staff's recommenda- tion for denial and outlined reasons. He stated that the applicant's tract (No. 6283) was approved by A.V. No. 67-8 for a zero lot line construction with a ten (10) foot minimum opposite side yard. The tract's CC & R's required a fifteen (15) foot exterior side yard. Conditional Exception No. 80-18 was approved for interior side yard encroachment on appeal by the Planning Commission. Further, there are no previous cases in the vicinity in which the Board of Zoning has granted approval under exact circumstances. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Two Acting Chairman Evans opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Haney introduced himself to the Board. He stated that corner lots bear greater restrictions than internal lots; that the design, flexibility and usage are significantly hampered by extra ordinary setbacks, corner cut-offs and increased exterior side yard require- ments. Also, that corner lots use only eighty-eight (88) percent of usable land afforded. He said he works until 7 p.m. and since a cooling wind normally prevails after 4 p.m. in Huntington Beach, an enclosed area for a spa is necessary which would provide him with therapeutic whirl pool baths helping circulation in his legs caused by a World War II disability. The Board questioned Mr. Haney on an alternative location in his rear yard for an enclosed spa by the master bedroom. Mr. Haney said that although not shown on the site plan, he has a swimming pool and patio area in his rear yard. Mr. Tommy Totals, general contractor, spoke in favor of the plan. Pictures were submitted to the Board Members showing the proposed location for the addition in relation to the eight (8) foot block wall. He said the addition would only be one (1) foot higher than the block wall with the same type of roof de- sign matching the existing roof line of the home. He stated that he felt this addition would enhance the aesthetics of the neighborhood. The Public Hearing was closed. Board discussion ensued. It was the Board's decision to uphold Staff's findings for denial. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY LIPPS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-22 WAS DENIED WITH FINDINGS AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-22 REASONS FOR DENIAL: 1. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on the other properties in the vicinity because this is a typical R-1 lot. There are no special typographic features or any unique characteristics related to the property. The addition could be accommodated elsewhere on the lot or within the existing structure. 2. The granting of Conditional'Exception No. 83-22 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations around proper- ties in the vicinity. The subject property was legally sub- divided and developed in a manner consistent with applicable zoning laws. The hardship is of the applicant's own making. -2- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Three 3. The subdivision':s original CC & R's required a fifteen (15) foot exterior side yard setback through the granting of Con- ditional Exception No. 80-18. The encroachment is into an area designed for open space and outdoor activity. AYES: Godfrey, Lipps, Evans NOES: Smith, Vincent ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 (In conjunction with USE PERMIT NO. 83-39) Applicants: John Kavanagh & Mike Whitney C.E. Request: To permit reduction in driveway width along side of building. U.P. Request: To permit a 1,809 square foot addition to building. Subject property is located at 16800 Beach Boulevard (west/flood control) Zoned C-4 Highway Commercial. The proposals were introduced by Acting Chairman Evans who informed all concerned that the Conditional Exception is a Class. 5 and the Use Permit is a Class. 3, both Categorically Exempt under the Calif- ornia Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that the lots frontage is only 48.25 feet. Further, that there are no other commercial uses along Beach Boulevard with twelve (12) foot five (5) inch driveways. Due to the fact that the subject parcel is substandard in size, the proposed use has inadequate circulation and parking for an automotive related use; that Staff has recommended denial. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman"Evans. Michael Whitney, applicant, addressed the Board. He stated that the lot was purchased in 1939 and was the last parcel to be developed in the area. He explained the circulation pattern for the site. Because of the width of the property cars will enter and exit a one-way traf- fic pattern driving around the side of the building, then entering into one of four underground pits for lubing and oiling of vehicles. Patrons will not have to leave their vehicles while service is per- formed. He stated that the property simply holds no value if the conditional exception is not granted. He said his neighbor is not interested in a driveway easement as he wishes to buy the subject property. They have five on -site parking spaces in addition to four (4) parking spaces within the automotive bay with less than 2,000 square foot of building on a 7,000 square foot parcel. The problem -3- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Four with the twelve (12) foot five (5) inch driveway width in lieu of twenty-four (24) foot providing access for fire vehicles to the rear of the building was explained to the applicant. Mr. Whitney informed the Board that he had checked into the possibility of purchasing and paving the road adjacent to the flood control owned by the County but was told that it would take at least six months to negotiate. He felt the cost would make it economically infeasible. Discussion carried on the possibility of eliminating the auto service located at the rear of the property. By moving the building back farther on the property, a redesign would eliminate a conflict with parking, provide improved parking and turning radius into the lub bays in addition to allowing for an increase in the drive approach width on Beach Boulevard. As the applicant did not request a continuance allowing additional time to revise his plan, the public hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Evans. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 (IN CONJUNCTION WITH USE PERMIT NO. 83-39) WAS DENIED WITH REASONS AND VOTE FOLLOWING: AYES: Smith, Evans, Godfrey, Lipps, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None The appeal process was explained to Mr. Whitney. At the end of the Board Meeting, Mr. Whitney asked that the Board reconsider action taken as he was willing to propose amendments to his plan. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, A RECONSIDERATION OF CONDI- TIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 AND USE PERMIT NO. 83-39 WAS GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT, WITH REHEARING SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD AT THE NEXT REGULAR BOARD MEETING ON JULY 20, 1983 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Smith, Evans, Lipps, Godfrey, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83�30 (In conjunction with USE PERMIT NO. 83-40) Applicant: Rudi Van Mil C.E. Request: To permit encroachment on site angle of Pad A & D. U.P. Request: To permit a 35,500 square foot retail/commercial center. -4- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Five Property located at 17471 Beach Boulevard (northwest corner of Beach and Slater). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applications and stated that the Conditional Exception is a Class. 5, Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, 1970 and the Use Permit is Covered by Negative Declarations No. 78-23 and 76-32. The Board Members were informed that Staff recommended denial of the applicant's request for a twenty-eight (28) degree encroachment into the site angle on Pad A located on the northeast side of the property and an eighteen (18) degree encroachment into the site angle on Pad D located on the southeast portion of the property due to interior visual obstruction to the property to the north and by preventing visual exposure to motoring public along Slater Avenue. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that the adjacent property to the north (Mazda dealer) is setback at fifty (50) foot off of Beach Boulevard, Further, that a twenty-five (25) foot setback is allowed by Code provided that one (1) foot of landscaping for each foot of encroachment is provided within the commercial shopping center. Mr. Godfrey submitted to the Board Members a copy of a letter re- ceived in opposition of Conditional Exception No. 83-30 and Use Per- mit No. 83-40 received from Mr. Sid Wasserman, owner of the adjacent property where upon,Beach Motors is located. The Public Hearing was opened on both applications. Mr. Rudi Van Mil addressed the Board. He stated that they had ap- plied for a variance on the property based primarily from an economic standpoint. He cited two other encroachments approved - Imperial Savings and World Savings, both within shopping centers with similar encroachments as proposed. He stated that he wished to obtain ap- proval of the site plan with Pad A and B proposed for a retail use, Pad C use unknown, and Pad D for a possible restaurant use with shortage in parking to be provided by night and day prime time ex- change or ten (10) percent reciprocal parking. Mr. Van Mil informed the Board that they have another proposal which they may consider using which substantially meets the Code requirements should the variance not be approved. Mr. Robert Jarrad addressed the Board in opposition speaking in be- half of Mr. Wasserman. He stated a number of items on the proposed plan which he felt warranted further study; e.g. compact parking, spaces adjacent to obstructions over twelve (12) inches which should have been shown as twelve (12) foot wide, joint use parking, unde- termined driveway location onto Slater, Beach Boulevard driveways, trash enclosure locations and drive widths at building sites to -5- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Six prevent parallel parking within travel lanes. He felt that there was no hardship involved as the proposed site is 488 foot by 273 feet and has ample room within its rectangular shape to plot build- ings without undue hardship. He also felt that wide streets are not rare in Huntington Beach nor do they impose a hardship on a three acre site. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor or opposi- tion of the applications, the Public Hearing was closed. Board discussion ensued. Findings and conditions of approval were discussed ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-30 WAS APPROVED AS AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-30 REASONS FOR DENIAL - PAD A: 1. Due to the visual obstruction which would be imposed on the adjacent property to the north, coupled with the fact that there are design alternatives available to the applicant, Staff is recommending denial of Conditional Exception No. 83-30, Pad A. 2. There are design alternatives available to the applicant which would allow him to comply with the Ordinance Code. REASONS FOR APPROVAL - PAD D: 1. Exceptional circumstances apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity. There are special typographic features and unique characteristics re- lated to the property. 2. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 83-30 - Pad D would not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 83-30 - Pad D would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and wel- fare nor injurious to the property located to the north. AYES: Smith, Vincent, Evans NOES: Godfrey, Lipps ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, USE PERMIT NO. 83-40 WAS APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: -6- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Seven USE PERMIT NO. 83-40 FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised plan to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval reflecting Pad "A" outside the site angle requirement and additional locations for the trash enclosures. 2. All future development on the site (Pads "C" & "D") shall be subject to the filing of a Use Permit Application to the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 3. The applicant shall enter into a planned sign program for the entire shopping center, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9760.43 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. Vehicular access rights for Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 5. Driveways on Beach Boulevard shall be the "X type" with minimum width of thirty (30) feet. 6. Driveways on Slater shall have a minimum width of twenty-seven (27) feet. 7. The development shall comply with all Huntington Beach Fire Code provisions. 8. The applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for the entire site prior to issuance of building permits, which -7- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Eight i shall depict a six (6) foot high block wall to act as a buffer to the adjacent residential property. The landscape and irri- gation plan shall be approved by the Department of Development Services and Public Works prior to occupancy. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, a rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delin- eate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 10. If Pad "D"'s use is for a restaurant, the applicant shall sub- mit to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits a site plan, floor plan, ele- vations and a request for reciprocal parking. AYES: Smith, Evans, Vincent, Godfrey NOES: Lipps ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-31 (In conjunction with USE PERMIT NO. 83-42) Applicant: Huntington Breakers Apartments, Inc. C.E. Request: To permit 25% compact parking, a reduction in the minimum square footage of one -bedroom units; and an increase in the permitted height - as approved in U.P. No. 82-44. U.P. Request: To permit a revised site plan for U.P. No. 82-44. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applications. Secretary Godfrey stated that as the original entitlement for the 342 unit apartment complex was approved by the Planning Commission, with conditions imposed, that both applications would have to be referred to the Planning Commission. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-31, IN CONJUNCTION WITH USE PERMIT NO. 83-42, WERE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR HEARING AT THEIR JULY 19, 1983 MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Lipps, Vincent, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -8- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Nine USE PERMIT NO. 83-41 Applicant: George C. Mc Cracken To permit an addition to a single family dwelling with nonconforming yards. Property located at 7001 Betty Drive (north side of street). Acting Chairman Evans stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that Use Permit No. 83-41 is asking the Board for approval for two structures; one of which was permitted (Building Permit No. 12,000) but never finaled, and the other which was constructed without benefit of permits. To- gether the two structures have created a nonconforming situation. Since original construction of Tract No. 4053-1960, the applicant converted a front facing garage into a bedroom. A garage was con- structed at the rear with a one (1) foot setback from the property line which was legal at that time. In 1972 a den addition attaching the home to the garage was constructed. In 1972 assessors buildings per Code were to remain at least six (6) foot from the main building and from each other providing the addition would not take up more than fifty (50) percent of the rear yard. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. George Mc Cracken addressed the Board. Present was the property owner and the tenant wishing to purchase the home. Mr. Mc Cracken stated that the nonconformance was brought to light when the tenant tried to purchase the home. He stated that the home was a sales model and that the garage has a one -hour fire wall with the exception of the door which should be solid core per the Uniform Building Code. Upon review of the applicants plans, it was noted that fire services, if required, could be obtained from Goldenwest as the property is located on a corner lot with the front and west sides abutting public streets. Further, the applicant stated that they are willing to take out the necessary permits bringing the additions into conformance with the Code. The Public Hearing was closed. It was the feeling of most of the Board Members that although they were approving a nonconforming situation that if the structures were brought into conformance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code the request should be approved. Taken into consideration was the fact that the residential dwellings rear yard abuts the Wintersburg High School Parking lot. -9- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Ten ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY LIPPS, USE PERMIT NO. 83-41 WAS CON- DITIONALLY APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: USE PERMIT NO. 83-41 FINDINGS: 1. The establishment and maintenance of the use will not be detri- mental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor detrimental to the property and improvements in the vicinity of subject use providing that the structures are brought into conformance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposed use is consistent with the City's General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received June 28, 1983 shall be the approved layout. 2. The applicant shall submit plans and obtain all required permits for the existing extended den prior to any building permits being issued on the subject request. AYES: Smith, Evans, Lipps, Vincent NOES: Godfrey ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-22 Applicant: Guy Guzzardo dba Windensea To permit an addition of food service to an existing retail business. Proposed location is 520 Pacific Coast Highway. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey briefly outlined the applicant's request stating Staff's concerns which needed clarification by the applicant. As Mr. Guzzardo was not present, a continuance was suggested allowing additional time to recontact the applicant requesting that he be pre- sent at the next regular Board Meeting. -10- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Eleven ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-22 WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JULY 20, 1983 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Lipps, Vincent, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-30 Applicant: The Huntington Partnership c/o Michael Croft To permit installation of controlled parking systems for existing re- tail/marina complex, and development of new marina restroom facility. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this re- quest is Categorically Exempt, Class. 3, California Environmental Qua- lity Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that due to the high volume of traffic along Pacific Coast Highway coupled with high traffic counts generated by Peter's Landing, a potential traffic hazard would exist if the con- trolled parking was approved as proposed. Reasons for denial were outlined. The Board discussed with Mr. Croft the fact that due to the relatively short distance (80 feet) between the parking arm and coast highway the stacking problem poses threat to the health and safety of the neighbor- hood. He was informed that our traffic division felt that a 150 foot distance from Pacific Coast Highway should be provided to alleviate a possible stacking problem allowing a substantial change in parking but felt by redesign could be worked out. Mr. Croft informed the Board that controlled parking would be manned at all times in addition to a control arm felt to provide convenience and safety to the centers patrons. The applicant was informed that the proposed bathroom facil- ity was felt to be inconsistent with the residential property to the south and that its location does not appear to be conveniently assess- ible to the marina users. In addition, circulation, drive widths avail- able, required parking, problems connected with Anderson's Street, etc. were discussed with the applicant. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-30 WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK WITH THE APPLICANT'S CONCURRENCE, TO ALLOW AD- DITIONAL TIME FOR THE APPLICANT TO WORK WITH STAFF ON A REVISED PARKING LAYOUT TO BE HEARD AT THE BOARD MEETING OF JULY 20, 1983 BY THE FOLLOW- ING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Lipps, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -11- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Twelve TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-562 Applicant: Mansion P-roger•ties, Inc. To permit consolidation of property into three (3) parcels. Property located at the southwest corner of Huntington and Clay (north of Yorktown). Acting Chairman introduced the proposal and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey outlined the suggested findings and conditions for approval which were discussed with the applicant. Mr. Eadie, present, acknowledged his concurrence with the conditions of approval. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY LIPPS, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83- 562 WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-562 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed parcel consolidation is consistent with the City's General Plan. 2. The site is physically suited for this type of development. 3. The General Plan and Huntington Beach Ordinance Code has set forth provisions for the consolidation of land as well as set- ting forth objectives for implementation of this development. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width, easements and improve- ment features shown on the proposed map are to be constructed in compliance with the State Map Act and Huntington Beach Sub- division Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Devel- opment Services on June 30, 1983 shall be the approved layout. 2. That this parcel map comply with all conditions of Tentative Tract No. 11417. 3. The blue border of the parcel map shall include -two centerlines - Yorktown Avenue and Huntington Street, for purposes of incorpor- ation into right-of-way designated to ultimate widths to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. -12- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 riPage Thirteen 4. All public improvements shall be installed on Parcels 1 and 2 at the time the first phase of the ranch project is undertaken or at time of construction on Lots 1 and 2 - whichever occurs first. 5. That the parcel map include the designated right-of-ways at the intersections of Clay and Main Street and Clay and Huntington Street. 6. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 7. Twenty (20) feet radius at the southwest corner of Clay and Huntington Streets. Thirty-two (32) feet radius - Clay and Main Streets. Vehicular access rights to Main and Yorktown shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the BZA. 8. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Depart- ment of Development Services. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Lipps, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-40 Applicant: George E. Arnold To permit a seasonal parking lot - property located at 111 & 113 - 15th Street (100 ft. south of Walnut). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the application and stated that this request was Categorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Mr. Arnold addressed the Board and asked for consideration from the Board granting approval of his seasonal parking lot. It was suggested to Mr. Arnold that as there were concerns with his seasonal parking lot located at 14th and Pacific Coast Highway with conditions imposed not carried out and with complaints received, in addition to the fact that he was using the adjacent parcel for which he has no authority to do so, that he contact the Land Use Enforcement Officer to get the problems resolved prior to the Board taking action on another entitlement. -13- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Fourteen Mr. Arnold expressed his feelings; stated that he would seek help from the attorney's office and left the meeting. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-40 WAS CONTINUED CONDITIONALLY BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Lipps, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-564 Applicant: Surender Dewan, Don Greek & Assoc. To permit the development of property into a Commercial Project. Property located at the southwest corner of Beach and Warner (west side of intersection). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this request is covered by the Beach/Warner EIR. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY? TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-562 WAS REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 198 TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-26 - M. WESTLAND COMPANY AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-e18 - M. WESTLAND COMPANY, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, NOES: None ABSTAIN: None MISCELLANEOUS ITEM: Evans, Smith, Lipps, Vincent BOARD REVIEW Applicant: James Mac Eachern Review of architectural surface treatment for commercial building located at 21182 Beach Boulevard. Secretary Godfrey stated that Mr. Mac Eachern is proposing to refur- bish a commercial building with a shopping center with surfacing materials. Staff felt it was not excessive enough 'to require an entitlement but felt a review by the Board would be appropriate. Pictures and renderings were displayed to the Board Members for re- view depicting the parapet type of materials and siding to be used on the commercial building. Mr. Mac Eachern was informed that today' review would not include signing which at a later date would have to comply with Article 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. -14- BZA 7/13/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 13, 1983 Page Fifteen Elevations were reviewed noting an increase of three (3) and one- half (2) foot to the existing roof line. Mr. Mac Eachern was informed of the following: 1. Rendering and pictures submitted were approved as to colors, wood and architectural features. 2. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall have the structural plans approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Depart- ment. It was felt by all of the Board Members that Mr. Mac Eachern's plan was architecturally in conformance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments -15- BZA 7/13/83