Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-07-201 J MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1983 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA - 1:30 P.M. Godfrey, Evans/Crosby, Smith, Vogelsang, Vincent MINUTES_: ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY SMITH, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 29, 1983, WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vogelsang None Vincent ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-30 (Continued from 7/13/83) Applicant: The Huntington Partnership, c/o Michael Croft To permit installation of controlled parking systems for existing retail/marina complex, and development of new marina restroom facility. Property located at 16400 Pacific Coast Highway. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members and all concerned that the applicant would like an additional week to work on his revised plans. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-30 WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JULY 27, 1983, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Vogelsang, Smith, Vincent NOES! None ABSTAIN: None Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Two CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-33 IN CONJUNCTIONx WITH USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 Applicant: Marc & Teri Wilson C.E. Request: To permit direct entry garage setback of four (4) foot in lieu of twenty-two (22) foot. U.P. Request: One year extension of time - permitting an addition to a nonconforming single family dwelling. Property located at 1019 Huntington Street (west side of street). Secretary Godfrey stated that he had received a letter from the applicant stating that due to illness they were unable to attend today's hearing and requested that the applications be rescheduled to the next regular Board Meeting. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-33 IN CONJUNCTION WITH USE PERMIT NO. 82-20 WERE CONTINUED FOR ONE WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JULY 27, 1983, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 (Continued from 7/13/83) IN CONJUNCTION WITH USE PERMIT NO. 83-39 Applicants: John Kavanagh & Mike Whitney C.E. Request: To permit reduction in driveway width along side of building. U.P. Request: To permit 1,809 square foot addition to a building. Subject property located at 16800 Beach Boulevard (west/flood control). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposals and stated that the Conditional Exception is a Class. 3 and the Use Permit is a Class. 1, both Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey reiterated that at the Board Meeting of July 13, 19 , Mr. Whitney had requested a reconsideration of denial action taken by the Board as he agreed to modify his site plan taking into con- sideration the concerns of the Board, e.g. removal of the auto -2- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Three repair located at the rear of the property which by moving the building back farther on the lot would provide a thirty (30) foot drive approach from Beach Boulevard, eliminate a conflict with parking, allow a better parking layout, and provide sufficient turning movement into the lube bays. The revised site plan was submitted to the Board Members for their review which included the auto repair building located at the back of the property. Acting Chairman Evans reopened the Public Hearing allowing the applicant to address the Board on their concerns. Mr. Whitney stated that the new plan increased the drive width and turn around area to the west by four (4) feet. He stated that his original intent was to omit the auto service located at the rear of the property and move parking from the front to the rear, but that when he worked on the "numbers" they did not make sense. He stated that when he checked into the Code requirements he found out that for every 500 square feet one parking space is required. This meant three (3) parking stalls need to be provided on the site, in lieu of five (5) originally proposed, in addition to the four (4) within the lube bays. The Board informed the applicant the trash enclosure could not be located at the rear of the building, there was a concern with park- ing, etc. The Board Members, realizing that the width of the ap- plicants property was creating his problem, felt that Mr. Whitney should meet with Staff to work out a redesign of his plan prior to the next Board Meeting. Mr. Whitney concurred. - ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-28 IN CONJUNCTION WITH USE PERMIT NO. 83-39, WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JULY 27, 1983, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-22 (Continued from 7/13/83) Applicant: Guy Guzzardo dba Windensea To permit an addition of food service to an existing retail busi- ness. Property located at 520 Pacific Coast Highway (north side of highway). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. -3- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B-. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Four Secretary Godfrey informed all the Board Members that Staff. r'e- commended approval of this application and outlined suggested findings and -conditions for approval. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that the applicant received approval under his lease agreement for the City owned property for the requested modifications allowing the sale of food items subject to his proposed plans meeting the requirements of the City Building Code as well as the County Health Department. He stated that there are five,(5) lots -of legal record whereon is located.a residential house with -a detached garage,`which'-is nonconforming in -a C-3-zone, retail -surfboard--shop with parking fronting Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed use is within the surfboard shop. Secretary Godfrey outlined suggested findings and-coridition's for approval as recommended by Staff.- _The condition with regard to manufacturing or repair activity of surfboards in the garage was discussed at length. Mr. Guzzardo explained'that there -Is no manufacturing being done only minor surfboard repair. The surf- board shop is a retail store only wherein he wishes to begin the sale of various food items, e.g.,-frozen bananas,- ice cream bars, cookies, and so'ft-drinks. There will be no cooking -facilities -with the exception of a crock pot to heat the chocolate for the frozen bananas. There will be no inside seating for the snack bar. Discussion carried on the type of'.chemicals used for repair of -surf- boards. Mr. Guzzardo stated that,his operation -has been inspected by the Fire Department and that he has received Ia permit for -the repair work from the Fire,Department.- Mr. Guzzardo was -informed that-evidence'of-a permit to use the residential garage would have to be shown for the surfboard repair from the Fire_Departme_nt prior to issuance of.building -permits-if -the use is to remain: - ON -MOTION BY SMITH -'AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO..83-22, WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: ADMINISTRATIVE'REVIEW NO. 83-22 FINDINGS: 1. The -addition of -food service-- retail use in an existing retail business will not be detrimental to the general welfare or to persons working or residing in the vicinity nor -injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health or wel- fare of -the general public-. -4- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Five CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plan submitted and dated May 18, 1983 shall be the approved conceptual layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall re- stripe.the parking area so that it conforms to the provisions of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall sub- mit evidence of approval to the Secretary of the Board for the surfboard activity from the Fire Department to use the residen- tial garage. The applicant shall secure approval change of occupancy from the Building Division of Development Services. Otherwise, this activity shall be removed. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval by the departments of Public Works and Develop- ment Services. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map or parcel map waiver request in order to consolidate Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Huntington Beach Tract (Assessor's Parcel No. 024-152-13). The parcel map or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder prior to final inspection of the food service business. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall make all required dedications to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 7. Sit down patron service shall not be permitted as an approved use in this review. 8. Nothing in the way of cooking facilities other than the crock pot proposed will be allowed in this use. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Vogelsang, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.-83-32 Applicant: Robert V. Robey, To permit minimum dimension of 16'-6" for open space requirement in lieu of 25' minimum dimension as called for in Section 9103.3.1.1.3. Subject property is located at 20102 Cape Cottage Lane (east side of street). -5- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Six The application was introduced by Acting Chairman Evans who in- formed all concerned that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that Staff is asking the Board to con- sider denial of this request and outlined suggested reasons for denial. He stated that the Code requires 1,200 square feet of open space with a minimum dimension of twenty-five (25) feet; that open space is met on the property at 1,275 square feet but that the applicant cannot meet the minimum dimension to accom- modate a room addition to an existing dwelling. He stated that the encroachment would be inconsistent with other entitlements in the vicinity under this zone classification and, if approved, may set a precedence for future requests of this kind. The original subdivision created this lot at the existing width. The lots adjacent are wider, the intent being to average lot widths so as to have the average lot areas 6,000 square feet. Some of the lots would have to be of less than average and would accommo- date smaller structures thereby creating some variation in home size. This lot is such a lot. The existing structure meets the requirements for open space but the new addition would reduce the minimum dimension. It is felt that by approval of this encroach- ment into the rear yard area it would extend into an area to be used for active and passive activities and would minimize impacts created between properties. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. Robey addressed the Board. He stated that his home is not typical of other homes in the vicinity. His property is fifty (50) feet wide. Most adjacent properties are sixty (60) feet wide. He stated that his particular model is the largest home in the sub- division. Further, that other additions within his tract having the same model home do not require a variance when their lot area is 6,000 square feet as they can accommodate their minimum dimension within the front yard area. If his home had not been placed back so far on the lot he could have met the open space as well as the minimum dimension required by Code. It was the feeling of most of the Board Members that as the appli- cant's lot is less than standard width and had the house not been setback thirty-four (34) feet from the property line, the applicant could have built this addition without a variance and for this rea- son felt approval of this conditional exception was justified. ON MOTION BY VOGELSANG AND SECOND BY VINCENT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-32, WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: -6- BZA 7/20/83 1 Minutes: H.B. July 20, 1983 Page Seven Board of Zoning Adjustments CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-32 FINDINGS: 1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege in that the subject property is located on a lot with less than standard width. 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties. 3. The proposal to construct a single story addition to an exist- ing dwelling would be consistent with what exists throughout the neighborhood. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not be material- ly detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to properties in the same zone classification. This addition is proposed to be attached to the rear portion of the house. The requirement of minimum open space area will be met. 5. The applicant's house is set back further on his lot than what is normal in his neighborhood. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plan and elevations received July 5, 1983, shall be the approved layout. 2. The addition shall be architecturally compatible in side texture and roof materials. AYES: Smith, Evans, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: Godfrey ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-34 IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-39 Applicant: C. J. Howe Construction, c/o William L. Studley C.E. Request: To permit existing structure to encroach twenty (20) feet into existing sideyard. Reduction of one (1) parking space. A.R. Request: To permit an establishment of contractors industrial use within an existing 1,100 square foot building. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Newland and Hamilton. -7- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.A. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Eight Acting Chairman'Evans stated that the Conditional Exception is a Class. 5 and that the Administrative Review is a Class. 3, both Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that the existing structure had'been a pump station -for the Orange County Sanitation District which has now been abandoned because of construction of a sewer intercepter line. The structure is nonconforming with relation to existing sideyard. The nonconforming situation came about because -of a right-of-way taking on Hamilton and Newland for street purposes. For the Board's consideration, Secretary Godfrey mentioned that technically three ,(3) parking spaces would be re- quired with backing out movement out into Newland Street to get vehicles out of the parking area. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Bill Studley introduced himself to the Board. He stated that the Orange County Sanitation District is contemplating selling the prop- erty to Mr. Howe. The site has been abandoned as a pump station. He stated they bought the land in the late fifties and it was de- creased in size as they gave'the City the right-of-way for widening of the Hamilton and Newland intersection. There was no condemnation - a free gift to the City. He stated they operated subjects for twenty (20)'years and now it's surplus and that they would like to sell it. He said the district has an offer contingent upon what Mr. Howe can use it for. Mr. Howe is in the business of mobile home remodeling. He operates his business solely by himself and would use the site for an office and storage of aluminum products, etc. mostly inside of the building which has a basement previously used by the district for a wet well housing,a large pump. The basement is located fifteen (15) feet below the ground floor. The ground floor is up about three (3) to four (4) foot above the side- walk. Mr. Studley felt that the traffic generated by the,proposed use would be similar to what has transpired over the past twenty (20) years. Mr. Howe addressed -the Board and stated that he felt that the refurbishing of the landscaping within ninety (90) days of permitted use would not create a problem. The Public Hearing was closed by Acting Chairman Evans. Findings and conditions of approval were discussed. Acting Chairman Evans expressed his concern vehicles backing out onto an arterial highway. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-34 IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-39 WERE APPRO- VED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: -8- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Nine CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-34 IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-39 FINDINGS FOR C.E. NO. 83-34: 1. The granting of the conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege in that subject property is located on a lot with less than standard size because portions of the property were given up for street widening purposes. 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the subdivision. There are exceptional circumstances be- cause of the size of the lot which would deprive this property of privileges enjoyed by other properties. The existing struc- ture, except for the sideyard, meets setback requirements, land- scaping and has an architectural treatment which is compatible with the neighborhood. 3. The existing structure and use would be consistent with what exists within the vicinity. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious -to property in the same zone classification. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR C.E. NO. 83-34: 1. That the plot plan submitted July 7, 1983 be the conceptually approved layout. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A. R. NO. 83-39: 1. The plot plan as submitted shall be the approved layout dated July 7, 1983. 2. That the parking shown on the plot plan shall be striped in accordance with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code prior to occupancy of the building. 3. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the depart- ments of Development Services and Public Works for review and ap- proval prior to occupancy. Installation and rehabilitation of the approved landscaping shall be accomplished within 90 days of permitted use. -9- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Ten 4. The building shall conform to existing Building and Fire Code requirements. 5. Outside storage shall be maintained from public view behind the block wall. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: Evans ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-35 Applicant: Allen J. Stroh To permit a reduction of open space area to 420 square feet with a 20 foot minimum dimension and reduction of minimum dimension from 20 feet to 18 feet and 112- feet. Property is located at 18071 Freshwater Circle (west side of street). Board Member Smith excused himself from the hearing of subject ap- plication -as his home is located within the same subdivision. Chairman Evans introduced the application and stated that this re- quest is Categorically Exempt, Class. 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that Staff has recommended denial of Conditional Exception No. 83-35. He stated that the single-family dwellings in the applicant's tract were originally approved by the City Council through a variance to reduce the minimum lot size. Because of this previous variance approval, the subject property is not standard in size. The subject property was legally subdivided and developed in a manner consistent with appli- cable zoning laws. It was felt there were no special topographical features or any unique characteristics related to the land which faces the lake at Central Park. The Public Hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mr. Stroh addressed the Board. He stated that they have a twenty (20) foot setback at the rear of their home and -that their lot is one of the smallest in the subdivision. They are proposing two additions; -one on the north side of the home and one on the east side mainly for privacy and elimination of noise as they have a five (5) feet sideyard setback with their neighbors television room adjacent to their bedroom. He outlined two other similar variances within his tract which were granted approval and felt that he should be allowed to exercise the same privileges as allowed his neighbors. The Public Hearing was closed. -10- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Eleven It was felt that the park across the street would provide re- creational open space and that if the addition were permitted parity would be granted the applicant. ON MOTION BY VOGELSANG AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-35, WAS APPROVED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-35 FINDINGS: 1. The single-family residences in the applicant's tract were originally approved by the City Council through a variance to be substandard in size and without the requested reduc- tion in open space/minimum dimension, a reasonable size addition would be prohibitive. 2. Due to the fact that the applicant's lot is only 50 feet in width, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. 3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property rights. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plan, and elevations dated July 8, 1983 shall be the approved conceptual layout. 2. The addition shall conform architecturally to the ekisting structure relative to surface texture and roof material. 3. A second -story addition is not permitted on the site. AYES: Vogelsang, Evans, Vincent NOES: Godfrey ABSTAIN: Smith -11- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Twelve USE PERMIT NO. 83-44 Applicant: August Management, c/o David Godrich or Ed Miggie To permit a temporary outdoor event - promotion for Muscular Dis- trophy, one day (July 23, 1983). Proposed location is at the Garfield Plaza, 19112 South Magnolia (southeast corner). Acting Chairman Evans was called away from the Board Meeting being replaced by Crosby. David Godrich addressed the Board asking for the Board's consider- ation of this civic affair. He stated that Robin Jacobsen is pro- moting this worthy cause and will comply with all conditions imposed. He stated that the temporary outdoor event will consist of a side- walk "sale" with two areas within the area parking lot planned for the location of two live band performances. The hours for the event will be from 8 a.m. to 10 o'clock p.m. Conditions of approval were discussed with the applicant in detail. ON MOTION BY VOGELSANG AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 83-44, WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: USE PERMIT NO. 83-44 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The plot plan received July 13, 1983 shall be the approved layout. 2. Signs shall be prohibited within the public right-of-way area. 3. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department shall be required prior to the event. 4. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical permits. 5. Certificate of Insurance coverage and Hold Harmless Agreement shall be approved by the Risk Manager - City of Huntington Beach prior to the event. 6. The applicant shall provide for clean-up of the area after closing of the event. 7. All Alcoholic Beverage Control requirements shall be met. 8. If overcrowding or fire lane violations take place during the event, the cost of fire enforcement will be the responsibility of the applicant. -12- BZA 7/20/83 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Thirteen 9. All requirements of the Ordinance Code shall be met. 10. A plot plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a permit. AYES: Godfrey, Vogelsang, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: Crosby NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 83-22 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-34 Applicant: Jack and Amy Hsieh To permit a two-story thirty-six (36) unit motel building to be located at 18112 Beach Boulevard. Acting Chairman Crosby introduced the applications. Secretary Godfrey informed all concerned that based on Staff's initial study of Negative Declaration No. 83-22 a draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a ten (10) day public review ending July 11, 1983. No comments were received. The Environmental Re- sources section recommends that the Board of .Zoning -Adjustments approve Negative Declaration No. 83-22. On motion by Godfrey and second by Vogelsang, the Board having found that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse affect on the physical environment adopted Negative Declaration No. 83-22 with mitigating measures imposed addressed with Administra- tive Review No. 83-34 by the following vote: AYES: Godfrey, Vogelsang, Vincent, Smith,,Crosby NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Secretary Godfrey stated that in keeping with the intent and purpose of Article 947 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code the proposed motel will provide "transients and vacation visitors with convenient access along heavily traveled highway frontage." The proposed motel is consistent with C-4 Highway Commercial Zoning and the General Plan Designation of General Commercial on the subject property. The conditions of approval were discussed with the applicant's in detail with emphasis placed on Condition number one and twelve. -13- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board -of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Fourteen ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CROSBY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-34, WAS GRANTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED FOLLOWED BY VOTE: NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 83-22 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-34 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised plan to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval which depicts a redesign to permit proper vehicular turnaround at the rear of the property. 2. All drive approach aprons along Beach Boulevard shall have a minimum width of 30 feet with a 27 foot driveway constructed to the "X" type design. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall sub- mit a landscape and irrigation for review and approval. Land- scaping shall be installed and shall be approved prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at location of clothes dryers. 5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 6. Low volume heads shall be used on all showers. 7. All building spoils, such as, unusable lumber, wire, pipe and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 8. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State accoustical standards setforth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. The interior noise levels of all units shall not exceed the California insulation stan- dards of 45 dba CNEL. Evidence of compliance shall consist -14- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Fifteen of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acous- tical engineering, with the application for building permits. All measures recommended to mitigate noise to acceptable lev- els shall be incorporated into the design of the project. 9. If lighting is included in the parking lot energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g., high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 10. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 11. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 12. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Fire Code. Specifically, the applicant shall provide a fire sprinkler system for all motel units and an on -site fire hydrant. AYES: Godfrey, Vogelsang, Smith, Crosby, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-38 Applicant: Parkside Associates, c/o Andrew J. Kalanz To permit a change in elevation previously approved by the Plan- ning Commission. Acting Chairman Crosby introduced the application and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 1, California Environ- mental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that the original plan was approved by the Planning Commission under C. U. P. No. 83-5 on April 5, 1983 for mixed use development on property located at the northeast corner of Talbert Avenue and Gothard Street. The use is now strictly to be industrial. The Board Members reviewed the proposed architecture of the site and discussed the elevations covering the 2.6 acres. Previously, the Planning Commission approved elevations for 4 acres. -15- BZA 7/20 /83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Sixteen The applicant was unable to obtain a financial commitment on that large of a project. Mr. Kalanz, representing the Parkside Assoc- iates, stated that they felt the change in elevations provided a more attractive industrial project. A right and left hand turn from the driveway in conjunction with the landlocked parcel at the rear of the property was discussed. Mr. Kalanz was informed that he would have to contact our Traffic Engineer with regard to movement from the site prior to issuance of building permits should they desire to have that kind of access. The applicant was informed that the drive apron would have to be a minimum of 27 foot in lieu of 24 foot shown on his plan. ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-38, WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IMPOSED SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-38 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed plan for development as submitted, and the future use of the subject site is consistent with the land use desig- nation of the City's General Plan as general industrial. 2. The proposed project as submitted is in substantial compliance with the applicable provisions and requirements of the Hunting- ton Beach Ordinance Code in relationship to Article 953, Light Manufacturing and Article 979, Off -Street Parking. 3. Through the use of proper site design, building orientation, design and landscape design, the proposed project will be compatible with surrounding land uses. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and schematic elevations submitted on June 24, 1983, shall be the approved site plan and elevations. The details depicted on the rendering displayed at the March 15, 1983 Planning Commission meeting for C.U.P. No. 83-5 which include colored awning over store -fronts, stamped and colored concrete at the entrances, the colors depicted on the building and the color accent trim shall be included as part of the final architectural design. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit to the staff for review and approval, a detailed land- scape plan in compliance with Article 979 of all other appli- cable City standards. -16- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Seventeen 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit to the staff for review and approval, a more detailed sign program which depicts sign size, location, style and colors. 4. All buildings and approved roadways within the proposed pro- ject shall comply with the minimum standards set forth by the Huntington Beach Fire Department which include, but are not limited to, emergency accessways, fire sprinklers, stand pipes and hydrant systems and fire alarm systems. 5. Drainage for the proposed project shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first building in the first phase. This drain- age system shall be designed to provide for erosion and silta- tion control, both during and after construction of the proposed project. 6. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach water system. 7. The sewer, water -and fire hydrant shall be designed to City standards. 8. The property shall participate in local drainage easement district requirements and fees. 9. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in all parking lots, parking structures and exterior landscaping and shall be designed to prevent spil- lage onto adjacent areas. 10. All building spoils such as unused lumber, wire, pipe and other surplus or unusable materials shall be disposed of at an off - site facility equipped to handle them. 11. A detailed soil analysis shall be prepared by a registered soil engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recom- mendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets and utilities. All structures and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate water conservation measures. These measures include low flush toilets, low volume shower heads, faucet flow controls and drought resistant plants within the landscaping. 12. Any outside storage shall be screened by the use of slatted fence, wall or a combination of both and shall comply with Section 9533.2.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. -17- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Eighteen 13. Movement of traffic for ingressing/egressing from the site shall be reviewed and approved by.the Traffic Engineer of the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. 14. The driveway width shall be twenty-seven (27) feet. AYES: Godfrey, Crosby, Smith, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-47 Applicant: Norman E. Conger, Scoutmaster, Troop 1 To permit a seasonal parking lot to be located on Pacific Coast Highway between 9th and loth Streets (east side of street). Acting Chairman Crosby introduced the application. Secretary Godfrey briefly outlined the proposal and stated that Staff is recommending approval of the use. Mr. Conger addressed the Board. He stated that they have been working the parking lot under a verbal agreement. He stated that the lot is secured every night and is totally enclosed. Further, that entrance is taken from 9th or loth street and not off of Pacific Coast Highway. He stated they work the parking lot only on weekends, manned by two people at all times, plus the Boy Scouts. Conditions for approval were discussed in detail. ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY VINCENT, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-47, WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED FOLLOWED BY VOTE: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-47 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The parking lot shall be totally enclosed to prevent indis- criminate pedestrian access on Pacific Coast Highway prior to opening of the lot. 2. The parking lot shall be treated with oil or graveled in accordance with specifications on file with the Department of Public Works. 3. Parking stall dimensions and drive widths shall comply with the provisions of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordi- nance Code. -18- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Nineteen 4. All striping shall be accomplished and approved prior to opening. 5. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition, free of trash or debris. 6. The parking lot shall be physically secured during hours of nonuse to prevent overnight parking. 7. On -site signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet and shall be in accordance with the design established on the municipal pier parking lot and shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 8. The conceptual plot plan received July 18,_1983 shall be approved by the Department of Public Works for internal circulation ingress and egress. 9. Appropriate signs for the direction of traffic and parking required shall be provided by the applicant. Said signs, location, and content to be as recommended by the Traffic Division of the Police Department. 10. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Admin- istrative Services Department, in an amount deemed necessary by the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, along with a Hold Harmless Agreement executed by insured. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, -Crosby, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-40 Applicant: George E. Arnold To permit a seasonal parking lot to be located at 111 and 113 - 15th Street. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board that the applicant had appeared before the Board at the meeting of July 13, 1983 requesting approval of another seasonal parking lot entitlement. He reiterated that Mr. Arnold was informed -that at such time as he was in conformance on his first entitlement (A.R. 83-36) that the Board would consider his application for an -additional parking lot. Secretary Godfrey stated that Staff has been informed by the Land Use Enforcement Officer that there are some conditions which have not as yet been met. He has not secured off the area and some posts have not been properly placed. Further, that Secretary -19- BZA 7/20/83 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Twenty Godfrey was unable to talk to Mr. Lipps prior to today's hearing to confirm complete compliance with all conditions imposed. He stated that Mr. Arnold was informed of exact locations for the posts in addition to roping the area off. Further, that Mr. Arnold has graveled both parking lots, is keeping them watered down, and has posts up preventing people from taking access from Pacific Coast Highway. He stated that as the applicant is present they may render a decision predicated on the above information. Mr. Arnold addressed the Board and expressed his feeling and informed them that within the next day or two the posts will be finished and the lots will be secured as requested. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND THE APPLICANT'S PROMISE TO THE BOARD FOR COMPLETION OF CON- DITIONS IMPOSED PROVIDING HE CONTINUES TO WORK CLOSELY WITH THE LAND USE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-40, WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-40 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The parking lot shall be totally enclosed to prevent indis- criminate pedestrian access on Pacific Coast Highway prior to opening of the lot. 2. The parking lot shall be treated with oil or graveled in accordance with specifications on file with the Department of Public Works. 3. Parking stall dimensions and drive widths shall comply with the provisions of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordi- nance Code. 4. If required, all striping shall be accomplished and approved prior to opening. 5. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition, free of trash or debris. 6. The parking lot shall be physically secured during hours of nonuse to prevent overnight parking. 7. On -site signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet and shall be in accordance with the design established on the municipal pier parking lot and shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. -20- BZA 7/20/83 I 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments July 20, 1983 Page Twenty-one 8. The conceptual plot plan received July 11, 1983 shall be approved by the Department of Public Works for internal circulation ingress and egress. 9. Appropriate signs for the direction of traffic and parking required shall be provided by the applicant. Said signs, location, and content to be as recommended by the Traffic Division of the Police Department. 10. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Admin- istrative Services Department, in an amount deemed necessary by the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, along with a Hold Harmless Agreement executed by insured. 11. That the applicant shall work very closely with the Land Use Enforcement Officer to make sure of compliance with the Con- ditions of Approval. AYES: Smith, Vogelsang, Crosby, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: Godfrey THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments -21- BZA 7/20/83