Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-01-04MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 1984 - 1:30 P.M. P P P P A BOARD MEMBERS: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent, Vogelsang P STAFF MEMBER: Pierce MINUTES: ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 23, 1983 WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 30, 1983 WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: -None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE.PERMIT NO. 83-60 (Con't. from 12/14/83) Applicant: Mc Donald's Corporation To permit a drive-thru addition to an existing McDonald's Restaurant. Subject location is 16866 Beach Boulevard. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Two Acting Chairman Evans introduced the application stating that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 1, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed the Board Members that he had received a call from the Mc Donald's Corporation representative asking that this item be continued for two weeks to enable him to get in to the Development Services Department to file a conditional exception application in -conjunction with subject Use Permit Application. ON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 83-60 WAS CONTINUED TWO WEEKS, TO THE MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 1984, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 83-3 Applicant: One Pacific Plaza To permit adjustment of approved parcel lines to conform to revised plans (Parcels 2 thru 7 - Assessor's Parcel No's. 142-342-4 & 5 - located at the intersection of Center Avenue and Huntington Village). Acting Chairman Evans outlined the applicant's request stating that per Section 15115, this.proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 15, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that this request covers a series of lot line adjustments allowing previously approved parcel lines to conform to revised building plans between vacant contiguous parcels. Staff's suggested conditions for approval were outlined. Gerald Klein representing the application addressed the Board question- ing the fact that an adjustment was shown between Parcels 7 and 8. Staff explained that a comparison of both maps revealed that Parcel 8 was moved northwesterly than was shown on his original map (No. 79585). Mr. Klein stated he was unaware of this change. It was the opinion of the Board Members that the revised lot line adjustments were consistent with general and specific plans for the subject property. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 83-3 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A revised plan shall be submitted delineating the lot line adjust- ment between Parcels 7 and 8. -2- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Three 2. Lot Line Adjustment shall comply with 5.9811.3.1 of the Hunting- ton Beach Ordinance Code. 3. Lot Line Adjustment shall comply with all applicable conditions of approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 79-585. 4. All proposed reciprocal easements or changes to any existing reciprocal easements affected by the lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services for review and approval as to form by the City Attorney. A copy of the recorded reciprocal easement shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services. 5. Applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Lot Line Adjustment to the Department of Development Services prior to occupancy of parcels 2 through 7. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-64 Applicant: Donna Oliveira To permit a garage to be constructed at zero sideyard setback in lieu of five (5) ft. requirement. Property located at 502 and 504 - 12th Street (Townlot Specific Plan). Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applicant's request which is categorically exempt, Class. 3, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff's suggested conditions for approval were outlined by Secretary Godfrey. Granting of this request will allow parity with other properties in the Towhlot Specific Plan District. The applicant, bonna Oliveira, introduced herself to the Board. She pointed out other zero sideyard setbacks within the general vicinity under construction and completed. She stated that as the subject property is a corner lot it has a greater sideyard setback than interior lots. Further, that all Fire regulations and the Uniform Building Code will be complied with. There being no one else present wishing to speak on the applicant's request, the public hearing was closed. It was the feeling of the Board Members that by granting the applicant's request not only would parity be granted but the proposal would provide an improvement within the Townlot Area. -3- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Four ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-64 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 83-64 will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification because the proposal grants parity with other residences in the Townlot Specific Plan District. 2. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 83-64 is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 83-64 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property in the same zone classification. 4. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 83-64 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plan, and elevations received and dated December 7, 1983, shall be the approved layout. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-67 AND USE PERMIT NO. 83-71 Applicant: Mr. Anthony M. Roberts C.E. Request - 1) To permit an existing commercial building's addition to encroach 28 ft. into required 50 ft. setback from PCH, 2) 7 ft. into required 20 ft. exterior side yard and 3) one (1) ft. into required ten (10) ft. interior sideyard. U.P. Request - To permit expanded use to add site area and additional deck area for increased seating, and 720 sq. ft. building. Acting Chairman Evans introduced both applications stating that the Conditional Exception is a Class. 5 and the Use Permit is a Class. 3, both categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Secretary Godfrey outlined staffs main concern with the project; propose - structure encroaching a considerable distance into the fifty (50) ft. -4- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Five front setback on Pacific Coast Highway. The plan was initially accepted prior to the adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan and is now caught up in the requirement for a 50 ft. front setback. The applicant's plan shows additional decking to be constructed with an outdoor eating facility which will increase parking for the structure. Mr. Godfrey stated that staff is recommending denial at this point unless the applicant is agreeable to moving the proposed structure back to conform with the setback requirement and can provide additional parking for the expansion of the deck area. Requirements of the Downtown Specific Plan were discussed. It was stated that in the language of the Downtown Specific Plan a master plan would have to be accomplished prior to issuance of permits and the fact that it is very ackward for individuals on leased property to submit a master plan which, ultimately, rests in the Redevelop- ment area. The subject property as it presently exists is nonconforming. The applicant's lease on the first five years will expire in December of 1988 with an additional five year lease remaining. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Chuck Miller and Mr. Anthony Roberts were present to speak on the proposal. Discussion carried on future improvements to the site felt to presently look like a Coney Island; addition of public restrooms, larger eating area, the fact that the applicant has access to the adjacent parking lot on leased property from the Huntington Beach Company allowing him to meet parking requirement, landscaping proposed, and that the deck would not have a permanent cover. The applicant stated he was unable to operate his restaurant with only six (6) tables and felt the encroachment into the'50 ft. setback was absolutely necessary. The public hearing was closed. Considerable discuss ensued. It was felt by the Board to allow the encroachment would possibly make an interim use more permanent and as the location of the restaurant is in such a sensitive area, an area studied intensively by the Planning Commission, that both applications should be referred to -the Planning Commission for hearing. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-67 AND USE PERMIT NO. 83-71 WERE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR HEARING AT THEIR JANUARY 17, 1984 MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Vincent, Evans NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -5- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Six USE PERMIT NO. 83-68 Applicant: Worldwide Church of God Rummage Sale To permit 8th Annual Rummage Sale at 7738 and 7742 Edinger Street. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the "special event" and stated this request is categorically exempt, Class. 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Secretary Godfrey informed all concerned that the rummage sale has been ongoing for several years at this particular location. Further, that a communication from the Police Department revealed that they have -no record of having a problem connected with the rummage sale. Conditions for approval were discussed for the fundraiser to be held on April 29, 1984 from 10:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m. ON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY EVANS, USE PERMIT NO. 83-68 WAS GRANTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IMPOSED, FOLLOWED BY VOTE: 1. The plot plan received December 13, 1983, shall be the approved layout. 2. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. 3. All requirements of the Ordinance Code shall be met. 4. A certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Administrative Services Department, in an amount deemed necessary by the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, along with a hold harmless agreement executed by insured at least five (5) days prior to the event. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 83-70 Applicant: Mr. Frank Mirjahangir To permit an increase in thirty (30). ft. maximum height limit. Property located at 4071 Figaro Circle. This request is a Class. 3, categorically exempt, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff stated that this request is to add additional square footage to a single-family dwelling and by so doing will increase the height above the minimum height of thirty feet. In order to exceed a thirty -6- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Seven foot in height limit, one of the Code requirements is that the applicant file a Use Permit application providing the structure over thrity feet is located 100 feet from another residential development. It also requires a sideyard setback of ten (10) ft. This existing structure will have a five (5) ft. sideyard setback in lieu of ten ft. required if it exceeds the thirty ft. height. Further, that staff has tried numerous times to reach the applicant to inform him of the need for the conditional exception but was not successful in contacting him. It was stated that if the pitch on the roof could be changed or the roofline reduced by three feet, there would be no need for the variance. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Evans. Mrs. Shapiro, property owner, and Mr. Mirjahangir, A.I.A., were present to speak in favor of the application. Mr. Mirjahangir explained that the reason for the additional height is to carry out the English tudor design; that the highest point of the pitch would be at 33 ft. The applicant was informed that if he wishes to pursue his original plan, his Use Permit application will have to be continued allowing additional time to readvertise a Conditional Exception variance for the interior sideyard setback reduction from 10 ft. to 5 ft. Mr. Mirjahangir stated that there are similar conditions existing in the subject area where permits were issued under similar circumstances. The applicant concurred with a two (2) week continuance. ON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 83-70 WAS CONTINUED TWO WEEKS, TO THE JANUARY 18, 1984 MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-73 Applicant: Mr. William Mitchell To permit an existing office and hotel. Subject location is at 307 Main Street. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applicant's request which is, categorically exempt, Class. 1, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Secretary Godfrey outlined the suggested conditions of approval; 1) The approval of Administrative Review No. 83-73 is to be viewed as a temporary use of the property for a maximum of three years, 2)_The applicant's future parking participation agreement dated October 18, 1983, shall become a part of this approval, 3) During this three year period, the building shall be retrofitted to satisfy seismic safety -7- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Eight requirements and convert by Use Permit to the permitted uses of District 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan or amend the Plan to allow hotel use and 4) that the hotel conform with all standards of the State and local Fire Code. Secretary Godfrey stated that the Downtown Specific Plan does not allow a hotel site use. At one time this was a hotel site on the second floor and this request will reinstitute that use. The applicant originally came in to apply fora building permit to allow offices on the second floor. It was,determined that if building permits for an office were issued, the building would have to meet the seismic safety requirements prior to use whereas if he converted it back to its original use he would have additional time to meet the seismic safety requirement. Mr. Mitchell entered into an agreement with Redevelopment that during the three year period, he will attempt to participate in securing additional parking within the Downtown area. Board Member Smith stated his opposition to reapproving the use of a vacant building when it does not meet the seismic safety requirement. The applicant was not present. A motion was made by Evans and second by Godfrey to approve Administrative Review No. 83-73 with staff's suggested conditions of approval. There was a split decision on the motion., Discussion ensued. It was stated that possibly the applicant should be present to discuss concerns with regard to the seismic safety requirement. ON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-73 WAS CONTINUED ONE WEEK, TO THE JANUARY 11, 1984 MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-80 =Applicant: U-Haul Co. of Orange County To permit the construction of a 40' x 60' building for servicing rec- reational vehicles. Subject property located at 19261 Beach Boulevard. Acting Chairman Evans introduced the applicant's request -and stated that this request is Categorically Exempt, Class. 3, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Mr. William D. Guthrie, property owner, was present to speak in favor of his proposal. Staff's suggested conditions for approval were outlined by Secretary Godfrey to all concerned. -8- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Nine Mr. Guthrie questioned the amount of additional landscaping and removal of the proposed wall in front of the new addition. It was explained to Mr. Guthrie that as the proposed addition to an existing building on Beach Boulevard is not setback at fifty (50) ft., the additional landsccap- ing is.required meeting the requirements of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Also, if the proposed wall in front of the new addition was constructed, it would screen a major portion of the additional 900 sq. ft. of landscaping. The remaining conditions were not felt to be a problem for the applicant. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-80 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted for review and approval depicting thirteen required parking spaces. 2. Elevation details depicting type of materials and colors to be used on the proposed building shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. New building shall be architecturally compatible with existing building. 3. A floor plan for the proposed service building shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services prior to the issuance of building permits.. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating lots 1 through 7 and 26 - Block A of Tract 837. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall submit to the Department of Development Services the following plans for review and approval: a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscape specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. A rooftop mechanical equipment plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 6. The portion of block wall in front of the proposed building shall be removed. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -9- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Ten The appeal process was explained to Mr. Guthrie. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-85 Applicant:. Union Oil Company To permit reconstruction of service station (existing building to be dismantled) new 170 sq. ft. kiosk to be constructed. Property located at 14972 Springdale. Staff informed all concerned that this is a request, within a C71 zone, to tear down an existing full -serve station, replacing storage tanks and reconstructing a self -serve station. A kiosk will be added felt to provide safety to an attendant. Suggested Conditions of Approval were discussed with Mr. Ken Barton and Richard Garcia, both of Union Oil,Company. Mr. Barton expressed concern with having to file for a zone change adding the "SS" suffix to the subject property.as they have been using the leased property for the past sixteen years,and are not changing its initial use. Additionally, because of time constraints, as the leasor of the subject property is located back east, a considerable delay would be created in obtaining approvals. It was explained to the applicants that when a service station is demolished and rebuilt from the underground upward, per Code, the "SS" suffix must be added to the property bringing the zoning into conformance with the use. With the addition of the "SS" suffix, the plan will substantially meet all the requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code for service stations. I - Discussion carried on the necessity of the development meeting local and State regulations. Mr. Barton stated that they are presently working with the local jusisdiction in Orange County. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 83-85 WAS GRANTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IMPOSED, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual site plan, floor plan, and elevations received and dated December 15, 1983, shall'be the approved layout. 2. All signing.shall comply with Article 948 and Article 976 of the Ordinance Code. 3. The applicant shall file for and be granted a zone change to add the "SS" suffix to the subject property prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the'Department of Development Services for review and approval laTidscape and irrigation plans complying with S.9481.8 of the Hunt- -10- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Eleven ington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. 5. All unusable spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 6. If lighting is included in the parking lot area, energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 7. Low volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 9. Development shall meet all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Fire Code, Ordinance Code and Uniform Building Code. 10. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None EXTENSION OF TIME TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 82-554 One (1) Year Extension of Time - To permit consolidation of two (2) parcels into one (1) parcel. Subject property is located at 7422 Mountjoy Drive. Joseph Hartge, of Hartge Engineering,was present and stated that as they are having a problem obtaining,title, a one-year extension of time is being requested. The waiver process of a parcel map was explained to Mr. Hartge. The applicant stated that due to their particular problem in obtaining the title, they preferred to go with the final map. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 82-554 WAS GRANTED A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME, EXPIRING ON MARCH 17, 1985, WITH FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IMPOSED, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. All previous conditions of T.P.M. No. 82-554 shall apply. -11- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes; H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Twelve 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 82-554 shall expire March 17, 1985. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 83-3 In conjunction with T.P.M. No. 83-584 Applicant: Seaborg Construction Acting Chairman Evans introduced the proposal and stated this request is categorically exempt, Class. 3, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Secretary Godfrey stated that the Site Plan Amendment was filed to provide two additional parking spaces as a parking deficiency would prevail with- out them. He informed the Board that the proposed additional parking spaces as shown on his site plan obstruct the onsite circulation for. the existing buildings. Further, the location of the additional spaces limits the usage of the southerly ingress -egress easement. He suggested that the applicant withdraw his application and pursue some other remedy for circulation necessary for this type of development; otherwise, denial of his application would be in order. Mr. Joseph Hartge and Rich De Carlo were present to speak in favor of their request. Mr. De Carlo stated that it was initially understood that the building on Parcel No. 2 was 7,100 sq. ft. which based on this figure fifteen parking spaces were required. A review of their building permit (No. 42481) revealed that the structure is only 6,971 sq. ft. requiring fourteen parking spaces. ,He,stated that they would like to relocate the one parking space now required to the southerly location where the trash enclosure is shown on the plan satisfying the problem with circulation. The applicant was infomed that on his final plan a minimum drive of twenty feet for ingress and egress was necessary. Landscaping was discussed. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 83-3 WAS CONDITIONALY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The revised site plan submitted to the Board on January 4, 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. On Parcel 2, one (1) parking space shall be provided adjacent to Stall 13 with proper circulation. The trash enclosure shall be moved further south on the property. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -12- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Thirteen TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-584 (In conjunction with S.P.A. No. 83-,3) Applicant: Seaborg Construction, Inc. To permit division of 0.89 acre parcel into two (2) parcels. Subject property located at 17701 and 17731 Sampson Lane. Acting Chairman Evans stated that this request is a Class. 15, per Section 15115 of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff's suggested findings and conditions for approval for the subject property located in the M-1 District were discussed. The applicant's, Mr. Joseph Hartge and Rich De Carlo stated their concurrence with the conditions to be imposed. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY VINCENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83-584 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed subdivision of one (1) parcel into two (2) parcels for purposes of light industrial development is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that development. 2. The General Plan. has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously.studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for light industrial development which allows for light industrial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improve- ment features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file, with the State Map Act, and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Development Services on December 13, 1983, shall be the approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services. 4. A reciprocal ingress and egress agreement between parcels 1 and 2 shall be recorded concurrently or prior to the recordation of a final map. -13- BZA 1/4/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments January 4, 1984 Page Fourteen 5. Compliance with all applicable previous conditions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 82-562. AYES: Godfrey, -Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None MTgrV_T.T.A?%7'PnT7C RTT�TTTFCC The following nominations took place for the Board of Zoning Adjustments for the Year 1984: ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, DARYL SMITH WAS NOMINATED CHAIRMAN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Vincent, Evans, Godfrey NOES: None ABSTAIN: Smith ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY SMITH; JIM VINCENT WAS NOMINATED VICE-CHAIRMAN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE ' AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: Vincent THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments I- -14- BZA 1/4/84