Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-05-09MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1984 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe STAFF MEMBER PRESENT: Pierce MINUTES: ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 11, 1984 WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- CRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-23 Applicant: Frederick B. and Phyllis E. Scott To permit a room addition to encroach into open space requirement. Subject property is located at 21352 Antigua Lane. Chairman Smith introduced the applicants request and stated that this proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 5, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff informed the Board that this request is to construct a room addition to a single-family dwelling on a 6,000 sq. ft. lot, recorded prior to March of 1969, having a twelve (12) foot rear yard setback. As the applicants cannot meet the required open space within the rear two-thirds of their lot, staff is recommending denial following the letter of the Code. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Smith. Mrs. Scott was present to speak in favor of their request. She informed the Board that an increase in family has created a need for more living space; that it's impractical and impossible for them to relocate. Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Two She said the area in front of their home is not condusive to an addition because of their floor layout. She cited a similar addition constructed on St. Augustine Drive which intersects at the end of her street. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor or opposition of the applicants request, the public hearing was closed. Upon the Board's review of the plan submitted, it was noted that the dwelling could have been set forward on the lot eliminating the necessity of a variance for the room addition. Additionally, as the applicants can meet the 900 sq. ft. of open space within their rear yard, although not in one designated area, granting of the applicants request was felt to be justified. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-23 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOLLOWING, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Granting of reduction in open space minimum dimension and minimum open space area will not reduce the required total open space area (900 sq. ft.). 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the Sttict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone class- ifications. 3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 84-23 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plan, and elevations received April 13f 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. The proposed addition shall be architecturally compatible with the existing structure. -2- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Three 3. The height of the proposed addition is restricted to one (1) story. AYES: Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: Godfrey ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 84-24 Applicant: Dx. John F. Pelochino To permit a restaurant addition to an existing building. Site location is 19471 Beach Boulevard. Following introduction of the applicant's request, Chairman Smith stated that the proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 1, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff outlined the applicant's request to take an existing building that is presently being used as a rental (jewelry store and dental office) and add additional square footage to provide space for a restaurant. This particular piece of property has a reciprocal ingress/egress with the adjacent property to serve the parking lot adjacent to Beach Boulevard. The public hearing was opened with Dr. Pelochino present to speak in favor of his request.. Concerns with the proposal were discussed i.e. insufficient backup space for parking area located at the rear property line requiring an additional reciprocal easement with the adjacent property; free- standing sign in the parking lot located outside of the landscape planter; parking space encroaching into driveway apron, nineteen parking spaces required in lieu of twenty spaces required for existing use (four spaces short with restaurant use with joint use of parking); existing drive approach on Yorktown felt to be hazardous, landscaping requiring refurbishment, trash area not enclosed, and onsite circulation. Dr. Pelochino felt to restrict hours of operation between the office/ commercial and restaurant use would not be a problem. The public hearing was closed by Chairman Smith. Discussion carried in an.effort to resolve concerns with the project. It was the consensus of all of the Board Members that due to the awkward circulation and inadequate parking, a restaurant was not the proper use for the site. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODRREY, USE PERMIT NO. 84-24 WAS DENIED WITH FINDINGS FOR DENIAL FOLLOWING, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: 1. The circulation pattern for the project is inadequate. 2. Parking along the north side of the building does not satisfy -3- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Four onsite parking requirement and necessitates reciprocal ingress and egress onto adjacent property. 3. The proposed addition allows for over -building of the site. 4. The proposal is not esthetically pleasing to Beach Boulevard, therefore, it would be detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity. 5. The granting of Use Permit No. 84-24 will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None The appeal process was explained to Dr. Pelochino. USE PERMIT NO. 84-26 Applicant: Mr. Robert C. Autrey To permit a 1,490 sq. ft. addition to existing retail commercial building. Site location is at 17404 Beach Boulevard. Chairman Smith introduced the applicant's request and stated that this proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 3, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff informed the Board that the subject site is within an established shopping center which recently was given a new face lift. The property owner now wishes to add an additional 1,500 sq. ft. for a tenant. The plan proposed meets the parking requirement with the exception of one more handicapped parking space necessaryper�Stiate requirement- Six (6) percent landscaping is required on the subject site as depicted on the applicant's plan. The public hearing was opened with Carron Herrmann present to speak in favor of the project. Concern with the area shown for the trash enclosure, increase in height of the rear wall and relocation of the security gate bringing same in line with the building were discussed, resolved and made part of the conditions for approval. The public hearing was closed by Chairman Smith. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, USE PERMIT NO. 84-26 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operatioii,of the use will -4- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Five not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building, 2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3, The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. relocation of trash area. b. additional handicap parking space, c. relocation of gate in line with building. d. extend planter along center parking bay. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a, Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Develop- ment Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 3, All signs shall comply with Article 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code (Sign area is larger than allowed at this location). 4. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 5, Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 7. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside -5- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Six lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 8. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 9. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 10, If the existing wall located at the east property line (adjacent to residential) is not six (6) feet in height, same shall be erected to said height meeting current Code requirement. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 84-30 Applicant: Humana Hospital To permit a commercial coach on the subject property for a period not to exceed five (5) years. Subject property is located at 17772 Beach Boulevard. The proposal was introduced by Chairman Smith who stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 11, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. At the subject location, there are five (5) temporary module structures approved by the Board on Conditional Exception No. 81-70 for a two year period pending completion of construction remodel for the hospital. A stipulation was imposed that after the two-year period, should continued use be deemed necessary, that the applicant would have to reapply to the Board of Zoning. Staff is recommending approval for an additional five (5) year period predicated upon review of their plan which meets parking, access, setbacks and landscaping required by the Ordinance Code. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Smith. Bill Carns, representing Humana Hospital, addressed the Board. He stated that their facility has remained unchanged since the origin application. However, the construction remodel is in the long and arduous process of State approval. He mentioned that this extension for office space and classroom use is vitally necessary pending completion of the expansion. The public hearing was closed. -6- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Seven ON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 84-30 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS, CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. Huntington Beach Ordinance Code - Section 9730.30 allows for temporary expansion of an existing use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual site plan and floor plan received and dated April 25, 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. As required by S.9730.30, a $500 cash bond shall be posted with the City for each module to guarantee removal of such structures. 3. This approval is valid for five (5) years commencing upon expiration of Conditional Exception No. 81-70 on September 16, 1983. AYES: Poe, Godfrey, Evans, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: None USE PERMIT NO. 84-32 Applicant: Mr. Ed Giardina To permit a temporary outdoor event less than three (3) days. Proposed location is 16400 Springdale Street (St. Bonaventure Catholic Church). Chairman Smith introduced the proposal and stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 1, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. -7- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Eight This particular request is for an annual event held by St. Bonaventur Church which has been ongoing for several years. Staff informed the Board that every year some complaints are received with regard to noise and traffic. Previous conditions for approval were discussed, with additional conditions suggested, felt to alleviate future problems. At the request of staff, Sgt. Cope of the Police Department, was present to outline his concerns with the event. He cited blocking of residential driveways, police officers circulating the interior of the carnival rather than manning the barricades, amd litter problems on private property. He felt an additional five (5) police officers should be required to man the barricades and that parking on arterials does not provide safety. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Smith. Mr. Ed Giardina, representing the Church, addressed the Board. He explained that last year, because of rain, the carnival area had to be relocated eliminating a number of parking spaces. He said that they would be willing to hire additional police officers to man the barricades, although last year the officers on duty felt manning of the barricades was not necessary. He said that this year, in lieu of volunteers, they plan to hire a professional sweeping company to clear the site and surrounding neighborhood of trash. There being no one present to speak in favor or opposition of the applicant's request, the public hearing was closed. Discussion carried on problems relayed by Sgt. Cope of the Police Department i.e. complaints received, unnecessary hardship created to adjacent residential neighborhood, and safety factors. It was felt by all of the Board Members that the carnival has outgrown this particular location. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 84-32 WAS DENIED WITH REASONS AND FINDINGS FOLLOWING, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: REASONS FOR DISAPPROVAL: DENIAL BASED ON PAST EXPERIENCE WITH FOLLOWING PROBLEMS OCCURRING: 1. On -site parking inadequate. 2. Off -site parking on an arterial. 3. Litter. 4. Blocking of driveways, fire hydrants, etc. in residential neighborhood. 5. Proper safety can not be totally enforced. 6. Complaints. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Based on above reasons, the proposal is not consistent with the -8- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Nine City's General Plan of land use because of too much traffic. 2. The granting of Use Permit No. 84-32 would adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The requested activity in this particular location, adjacent to a residential neighborhood, would be detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None The appeal process was explained to Mr. Giardina. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-2 Applicant: Kaiser Development Company To permit a lot line adjustment between Parcels 1 and 2 on Parcel M.ap 80-566►located on the south side of Bolsa Avenue,approximately 474 ft. west of Springdale. The adjustment showing an increase in size of 150 sq. ft. to Assessor's Parcel No. 145-531-26 was viewed by the Board. It was noted that legal frontage,allowing a flag shaped parcel, would exist. ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-2 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDING AND CONDITIONS FOLLOWING, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: FINDING FOR APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment is consistent with the criteria outlined in Section 9811.3.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 2. The applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Lot Line Adjustment to the Department of Development Services. 3. All previous conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 80-566 shall remain in effect. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -9- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Ten SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-6 Applicant: Far West Fir Sales Company To permit construction of approx. 900 sq. ft. additional office space attached to an existing office building located at 16300 Gothard (east side of street). Chairman Smith introduced the applicant's request and stated that this proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 1, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff informed the Board Members that a field check revealed that the amendment,as submitted,was substantially in compliance with the Ordinance Code (parking, landscaping, setback, etc.). ON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND BY EVANS, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-6 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated April 16, 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 3. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 4. The proposed addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-28 Applicant: Ray Olmshied or Robert B. Smith To permit two (2) multi -tenant industrial buildings totally 21,084 sq. ft. to be located at 17902"22 Gothard Street (east side of street). Staff informed the Board Members that this piece of property, locate in an Ml-CD District, is proposing commercial and industrial uses. The plan for the mixed use development will have three entrances to the sitep one of which is an easement from Gothard Street providi access to the north of the property. -10- BZA 5/9/84 1 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Eleven On August 1, 1983, the plan was reviewed by the Design Review Board. They have indicated that they would like to see the buildings spanish stucco with tile roofs allowing compatibility with the adjacent -industrial use located to the south of the subject property. Bill Hartge was present representing the property owner. It was agreed that the two (2) parking spaces shown at the north of the property behind Building "A" would be relocated adjacent to the west side of Building "A" and landscape planter eliminating the two-way drive shown. This change would provide adequate turnaround and maintain required parking. Mr. Hartge was informed that in the future should the proposed use change from an auto care center, there is a possibility that a fire sprinkler system may be required. ON MOTION BY SMUH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-28 WAS GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLOWING: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. fire lanes to satisfaction of Fire Department. b. relocation of two (2) parking spaces adjacent to north building to the west side. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval (landscaping shall be continuous throughout the site) . b. Rooftop mechanical equipment plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. c. Plan depicting slope stabilization planting. -11- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Twelve 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 4. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two (2) inches. 5. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27),feet in width and shall be of radius type construction. 6. Onsite fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department. 7. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. B. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building. 9. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 10. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 11. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 12. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 13. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 14. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 15. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 16. All Conditions imposed by the Design Review Board shall be complied with. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -12- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Pane Thirteen ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-30 Applicant: Mills Land and Water Company To permit use of an approx. 3-acre parcel as a seasonal parking lot from May 25, 2984 to September 16, 1984, located on Newland Street (approximately 850 ft. north of P.C.H. Chairman Smith introduced the applicant's request and stated that this proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 11, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Mr. Robert Moore was present to speak in favor of his request. He was informed of Ordinance No. 2691 recently enacted by City Council allowing a maximum of five (5) successive summer seasons in lieu of two (2), subject to, approval of an Administrative Review application by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. All seasonal parking lots are to conform to the requirements set out in Sections 9730.56, 9730.57, and 9730.81 of the Ordinance Code for temporary seasonal parking lots. Conditions for approval were discussed in detail with Mr. Moore. He was also informed that prior to opening of the seasonal parking lot all standards, requirements and improvements shall be installed. The parking lot shall then be inspected and approved by the City prior to issuance of a certificate to operate. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-30 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The parking lot shall be totally enclosed to prevent indiscriminate pedestrian access prior to opening of the parking lot on May 25, 1984. 2. Boundaries of such lots shall be marked off and secured by chain, chain link or cable, with posts a minimum of three (3) feet in height, solidly built. At a minimum, posts shall consist of 4" x 4" wood or equivalent metal posts a minimum of one and one-half (1-1/2) inches in diameter securely set in the ground and placed eight (8) feet on center. The posts shall be connected with at least one (1) strand of one-half (1/2) inch cable or chain securely fastened to each post. An opening shall be provided to accommodate vehicle access during business hours. A means of closing and locking of the access opening after business hours shall be provided. 3. Lots shall be surfaced to meet specifications of the Public Works, Fire and Development Services Departments for support of vehicles and to provide dust control. -13- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Fourteen 4. All aisle dimensions, bay depths, driveway widths, circulation and turning radii, shall comply with Article 979 and Fire Department requirements. Median lines of parking bays shall be marked off by a physical barrier such as concrete wheel bumpers, telephone poles or equivalent. 5. All striping shall be accomplished and approved before May 25, 1984. 6. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition free from trash and debris. Trash containers shall be placed on the site sufficient to accommodate and store all trash that accumulates on the lot. 7. Lots shall be secured to prevent overnight parking between the closing hour on one business day and -the opening hour the following business day. 8. An attendant shall be on duty at all times during business hours. 9. Directional and informational signs shall be displayed onsite to provide identification of entry into the parking lot and charge for parking and hours of operation. Such signs shall be locate ll at the entrance in a copy size visible to motorists entering th parking lot. O nsite signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet and shall not be more than eight (8) feet high, nor less than six (6))) feet high. Said signs shall be removed from the site each season no later than the third weekend each September. 10. An approved fire extinguisher shall be provided on the premises during business hours. 11. A certificate of insurance and a hold harmless agreement, in an amount required by the Chief of Administrative Services, shall be filed in the Administrative Services Department. 12. The conceptual plot plan received April 23, 1984, shall be approved by the Department of Public Works for internal circulation ingress and egress. 13. An inspection shall be made by Land Use and Public Works Department to insure that the above Conditions imposed have been met prior to opening of business May 25, 1984. 14. No signs, swags, cables, posts, signs, etc. shall be allowed in the public right-of-way. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None -14- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Fifteen ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-31 Applicant: Mola Development Corporation To permit a subdivision sales office and model homes at 5032 Dorado. Following introduction of the applicant's request, Chairman Smith stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 1, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Conditions covering the Cabo Del Mar sales office and model homes were reviewed with Chris Christie of Mola Development. ON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY , ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-31 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan dated April 24, 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. A landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval prior to final inspection. 3. A plan delineating various directional signs, landscaping and irrigation, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Development Services and Public Works and installed prior to final inspection. 4. Project identification (subdivision directional) sign shall comply with Article 976 (Sign Code) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 5. All roads (including fire access) shall be of hard surface, all weather construction meeting Public Works requirements and installed prior to combustible construction. 6. All access roads shall extend within a minimum of 150 feet to the farthest point of the exterior perimeter of the model homes. 7. All water lines and fire hydrants shall be installed and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of permits for any temporary or permanent structures. B. Security fencing, gates, locking devices, ingress and egress from streets and parking areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire, Police and Development Services Departments prior to issuance of building permits. -15- BZA 5/9/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 9, 1984 Page Sixteen 9. The office use shall be discontinued within 30 days following sale of the last on -site unit. A surety bond of $ 1,000 shall be posted with the City for the sales office and for each model home complex to guarantee compliance with all provisions of the code and the Huntington Beach Building Code. Such model homes shall only serve the tract specified in subject administrative review application. 10. Sales office shall not be converted or expanded into a general business office. 11. Fire lanes as determined and approved by the Fire Department shall be posted and signed. 12. Parking lot shall be installed to provide a minimum of twenty (20) spaces. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Poe NOES: None ABSTAIN: None THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO THE MONDAY MORNING STUDY SESSION ON MAY 14, 1984. Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments -16- BZA 5/9/84