Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-27MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27, 1984 - 1:30 P.M. LA BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent, Vogelsang STAFF MEMBER PRESENT: Pierce, Poe MINUTES: ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF MAY 23, 1984, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: Godfrey, Smith, Poe None Evans, Vincent, Vogelsang TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-577 Applicant: Raymond R. Ribal To comply with the requirements of the St3bdivision Map Act necessary to the obtaining of a permit for a building addition on Parcel 6. Staff informed the Board Members that the property owner, in conjunction with his Chief Engineer, prepared the subject parcel map creating four (4) parcels within the Pacific Plaza Shopping Center located at the northwest corner of Magnolia Street and Adams Avenue. It was noted that a twenty -foot flag exists to the rear of Parcel No. 4. Mr. Ribal, applicant, was present and acknowledged receipt and his concurrence with the conditions for approval with the exception of dedication. Mr. Ribal informed all concerned that dedication of Parcel No. 83, of Tract No. 4359, was dedicated at the time of original subdivision of the shopping center. There being no further questions of the applicant, the Board motioned for approval of the parcel'map. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-577 • WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed subdivision of four (4) parcels for purposes of Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments •June 27, 1984 Page Two commercial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for community business district allowing commercial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4.' The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Development Services on June 6, 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcels are developed. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcels are developed. 5. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel is developed. 6. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 7. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Depart- ment of Development Services. 8. All access rights along Adams Avenue shall be dedicated to the City.of.Huntington Beach except for locations approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 9. All previously recorded reciprocal easements for parking and access between the subject site and adjacent property are applicable • to this parcel map. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang .-2- BZA 6/27/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984 • Page Three CONDITIONAL_EXCEPTION NO. 84-25 - Applicant - Phil Zisakis AND USE PERMIT NO. 84-34 - Phil Zisakis C.E. Req. - Request "A" - To permit a reduction in parking, sight angle encroachment and elimination of a portion of required perimeter landscaped planter area; or Request "B" - To permit a reduction in required perimeter landscape planter area,, allow compact parking, a reduction in exterior side yard from 10 ft. to 6 ft. and parking encroachment into required perimeter landscape planter area. U.P. Request - To permit construction of a 2,000 sq. ft. commercial -building. Site location is at the northwest corner of Cypress and Beach Boulevard. Staff informed the Board Members that this particular piece of property is substandard in size and lot width making it a difficult piece of property to develop. The applicant has tried since the early part of 1980 to pursue construction of an automobile glass shop on the property. Alternative "A" allows for parking at the rear of the building. Alternative "B" depicts the building at the rear property line allowing for parking in front of the site. Staff's concerns with both alternatives were discussed: 11 both alternatives do not satisfy parking and perimeter landscaping requirements; 2) dedication required along Cypress and Beach radius shown incorrectly on both plans; 3) Alternative "A" encroache: into sight angle; 4) Alternative "B" encroaches into exterior side yard setback and both buildings encroach into setback on Cypress. The property is located within the Oakview Neighborhood Project Area with no comments received from Redevelopment as of this hearing. The public_ hearing was opened by Chairman Smith. Phil Zisakis introduced himself to the Board and stated he purchased the property in 1979.and would like to move his automobile glass shop presently located across the street, to the subject site. He stated that 75 percent of his work is done inside of his building. The remaining percent of his work is handling major insurance claims away from the site. He stated that he has been working with Redevelopment and adjacent property owners in an effort to pursue a cooperative development plan to insure the most beneficial development for the site.' Such a cooperative effort only needs Mrs. Walker's'(adjacent property owner) participation. Mr. Zisakis was not in favor of reducing the building size. There being no one else present wishing to speak on the applicant's request, the public hearing was closed. Following Board discussion, it was felt that neither proposal was • suitable for the site due to Code deviations. Additionally, that the use was too intense for the site. Findings for denial were discussed. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-25 - ALTERNATIVES "A" AND "B" WERE DENIED, WITH FINDINGS FOR DENIAL FOLLOWING, -3- BZA 6/27/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984 Page Four SUCCEEDED.BY VOTE: - FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - REQUEST "A": 1. The proposed site plan delineates four parking spaces in lieu of five required for automobile repair garage or ten required for commercial building. None of the four provided satisfy the parking requirement; three are within the building and one is within a required landscaping planter area. The proposed conditional exception requests a reduction in required parking that would be a special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2. The proposed conditional exception to allow elimination in perimeter landscaping' area is not compatible with adopted landscape standards and will be a grant of special privilege. 3. One-third of the building encroaches into the sight angle. ' This encroachment would prevent visibility of adjacent sight. 4. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 84-25 - Alternative "A" would adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - REQUEST "B": 1. The proposed site plan delineates seven parking spaces; five are required for an automobile repair garage and ten are required for commercial building. Based on request, site is deficient a minimum of three spaces. Of the seven spaces provided, three are within the building, one is compact. The proposed reduction in required parking and utilizing a compact space would be a special privilege inconsistent with other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2. The proposed conditional exception to allow reduction in perimeter landscape planter areas is not compatible with adopted landscape standards and will be a grant of special privilege. 3. Granting a reduction in exterior side yard setback from the required thirteen (13) ft. to six (6) ft. would be a grant of special privilege. 4. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 84-25 - Alternative "B" would adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang -4- BZA 6/27/84 • • 0 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984 Page Five , ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 84-34 (1N CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-25) WAS DENIED WITH FINDINGS FOLLOWING, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: 1. Because the plan as presented requires approval of Conditional Exception No. 84-25 - Alternatives "A" or "B", which have both been denied, Use Permit No. 84-34 is, therefore also denied. 2. Granting of Use Permit No. 84-34 will aaversely affect the General Plan of the,City of Huntington Beach. AYES: Godfrey, Smith,' Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: . None ABSENT: Vogelsang CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO,. 84-34 (In conjunction with N.D. No. 84-20 and U.P. No. 84-44) Applicant: G.P. Building Enterprise, Inc. C.E. - To permit-reauction of minimum dimension of 20 it. 0 inches for recreational area. Subject property located at 17181 Elm (west side of street). U.P. - To permit construction and maintain a seven (7) unit apartment with 14 garages. Chairman Smith informed all concerned that the applicant submitted a letter to the Board requesting that his architect speak on his behalf covering subject requests. Further, that Conditional Exception No. 84-34 is categorically exempt, Class. 5, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff informed the Board Members that this 7-unit apartment building is very similar to another building which the developer constructed recently located within the same vicinity (Oakview Redevelopment Area). It is the applicants contention that individual private patio areas are more desirable in lieu of common open space. The public hearing was opened. John King was present to speak on the applicant's request. Discussion carried on'the complex shape of the property and.the fact that the area is encountering a complete transition mainly consisting of apartment buildings ana older homes. Mr. King was informed that, should approval be granted, prior to issuance of a building permit a landscape and irrigation plan would require approval depicting tree locations in each private yard area satisfying concerns of the Board Members. The public hearing was closea. -5- BZA 6/27/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984 Page Six ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-34 WAS APPROVED AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The size of the lot and its ratio of depth to width are such to impose physical restraint upon its aevelopment. The applicant has provided a total square footage of open space greater than that required by the Ordinance Code. 2. Preceaence for exception of open space requirements has been established in this neighborhood. 3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enDoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare of in3urious to property in the same zone classification. •5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received June 22, 1984, shall be the approved layout. AYES: Smith, Evans, Godfrey, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-20 AND USE PERMIT NO. 84-44 WERE GRANTED WITh CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL AND VOTE FOLLGWING: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site.plan, floor plan and elevations received ana dated June 22, 1984 shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. Said landscape plan shall include one (1) fifteen gallon tree per landscape pocket area adjacent to north property line, two (2) twenty-four inch box trees in front yard area, and one (1) fifteen gallon tree in each private yard area. -6- BZA 6/27/84 • • Minutes: H.B% Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984" Page Seven -3. A hose bib shall be installed within private patio yard areas. 4. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27) ft. in width and -shall be of radius type construction. 5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 6. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, ana other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 8. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor.lamps.shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto ad3acent properties. 9. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 10. A detailea soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, str6ets, and utilities. 11. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or aetached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). AYES: Smith, Evans, Godfrey, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang -7- BZA 6/27/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984. Page Eight CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-35 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-19, USE PERMIT NO. 84-40 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-7 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-562 Applicant: Hartge Engineering Company C.E. request - To permit a drive aisle in the garage of 25 ft. width in lieu of required 27 ft., U.P. request - To allow a commercial office building to C-2 standards, T.P.M. request - To permit subdivision of one parcel into two parcels and A.R. request - To permit a reauction. in lot width°from 60' to 24' for C-2 use in C-4 District. Subject property'is located at 5075 Warner Avenue. The applicant's requests were introduced by Chairman Smith. The Board Members were informed by staff that approval of all requests are necessary for the proposed development. The tentative parcel map, upon approval, will provide for two (2) parcels. As C.E. No. 84-35 is the only application pertaining to Parcel 1 it was felt action could be taken on this particular request. Drive widths over 27 ft. are required in commercial and industrial areas to accommodate traffic associated with those uses. The height of the parking area under the building on Parcel 1 will restrict the area to passenger cars and perhaps pickups. Therefore, the Board Members felt the Conditional Exception could be granted as drive widths of 25 ft. are sufficient in residential areas. Adaitionally, before approval, the applicant would have to agree to submit a revised plan showing redesign of the commercial building on Parcel 2 allowing a circulation pattern through and around the building providing access to the rear parking lot. The applicant was informed that a hammerhead or radius type design within the rear parking lot would satisfy fire requirements. The public hearing was opened. Joe hartge aadressea the Boara ana stated his concurrence with submittal of a revised plan as expressed by staff. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-35 WAS APPROVED AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Approval of the request for reauction of aisleway wiath within the parking area of the proposed office structure would not severely impede traffic circulation. 2. Granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect adjacent properties or the community as a whole. -8- BZA 6/27/84 • Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Aa3ustments June 27, 1984 . Page Nine AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang ON MOTION BY GODFREY, AND SECOND BY SMITH, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-19, USE PERMIT NO. 84-40, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-7, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-562 WERE CONTINUED ONE WEEK, TO THE MEETING OF JULY 11, 1984, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-36 Applicant: Mr. Harlo V. Le Bard •To permit six (6) ft. high fencing to -encroach ten (10) ft. into ten ft. front yard setback. Property located -at 308 California Avenue. Chairman -Smith, introduced Mr. Le Bard's request and stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 5, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Staff informed the Board Members that the applicant's request is to reduce his front yard setback by a six it. high brick wall to be built along the -south 45 ft. of his property adjacent to a sidewalk which is locate'a at the end of California Avenue adjacent to the proposed Manning Park to allow privacy, safety and security. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Smith. Mr. Le Bard was present. Upon the Board's review of the location of the applicant's property, it was evident that a hardship did exist. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION B1 EVANS AND SECOND BY 84-36 WAS GRANTED WITH FINDINGS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. AND CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL AS 1. The granting of this Conditional Exception will not constitute a grant,of special privilege inasmuch as the subject property is located adjacent to a future park site. A letter has been received from Community Services Dept. stating no park structures are proposed adjacent to the subject site. -9- BZA 6/27/84 Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Aajustments June 27, 1984 Page Ten 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the subdivision. 3. The proposal to construct a dwelling unit would be consistent with what exists in the neighborhood. 4. The lot is of an irregular shape. 5. The granting of a Conditional Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor inDurious to property in the same zone classification. 6. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not aaversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 7. Proposea fencing will provide safety measure to prevent vehicular damage to recreational area. ,Mlb, CONDITION OF APPROVAL: The conceptual site plan receivea June 19, 1984, shall be the approved layout. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang USE PERMIT NO. 84-42 Applicant: Capt. Andy's River Towne Corp. dba T.J. Applebees To permit in Bldg. "D" a 3,500 sq. ft. restaurant and in Bldg. "C" - lst floor - 3,600 sq. ft. retail and 2nd floor - 1,600 sq. it. office. Sub3ect property is located at 17491 Beach Blvd. Staff informed the Board Members that a letter was received from the applicant requesting a one week extension for hearing of subDect Use Permit. ON MOTION'BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, USE PERMIT NO. 84-42 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JULY 11, 1984, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Vogelsang -10- BZA 6; �'7/84. Minutes: h.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments .June 27, 1984 Page Eleven USE PERMIT iNO. 84-45 Applicant: Mr. Eric F. Mossman To permit a six (6) unit apartment complex (Elm Street - east side of street). Chairman Smith introducea the proposal ana stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 3B, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. The Board Members were informed that staff recommended approval of the applicant's request for development in the Oakview Redevelopment Area. The public hearing was openea. Eric Mossman was present. Conaitibns for approval were discussed meeting the applicant's concurrence. The public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, USE PERMIT NO. 84-45 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: • 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan,' floor plan and elevations received and datea June 1, 1984 shall -be the approved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape ana irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. -11- BZA 6/27/84 H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27-; 1984 Page Twelve b. Rooftop mechanical equipment plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material _. proposed to screen said equipment. 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division and Fire Department. 4. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27) ft. in width and shall be of radius type construction. 5. Maximum separation between garage building wall and property line shall not exceed two (2) inches. .6. Building at zero property line shall be of maintenance -free construction and comply with Uniform Building Code - 1979 Edition. No drainage or eave overhang onto adjacent -parcel shall be allowed. 7. Onsite fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department. 8. A hose bib shall be installed within private patio yard areas. 9. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 10. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 11. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 12. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 13. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, dhemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. • -12- BZA 6/27/84 H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984 . Page Thirteen • 14. The structures on the subject � property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experiencea in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for .building'permit(s). 15. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 16. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. AYES: Evans, Smith, Godfrey, Vincent, Vogelsang NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 84-49 Applicant: William R. Ellis - Seacliff Village iTo permit a temporary outdoor event at 2205 Main Street (corner of Main and Yorktown Staff reported that this is an annual outdoor event following the 4th of July Parade. Conditions imposed for previous events were reviewed with no objective comments reported. It was felt that the same conditions should be reapplied with one additional condition being that an area should be roped off for serving of beer and wine controlled by a security person. ON MOT10N BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, USE, PERMIT NO. 84-49 WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The plot plan received June 8, 1984, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. The applicant shall obtain necessary electrical permits. 3. Prior to the operation of any equipment used in conjunction with the "special event", the City shall inspect to insure that the State of California - OSHA Certification is current. -13- BZA 6/27/84 h.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June Fourteen Page Fourteenteen 4. A -certificate of insurance form shall be filed in the Administrative Services Department in an amount deemed necessary by the Public Liability Claims Coordinator along with a Hold harmless Agreement executed by the insured at lease five (5) days prior to the event. 5. All alcoholic Beverage Control requirements shall be met. 6. A layout and circulation plan shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to the event. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. 7. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department may be required prior to the event. 8. Appropriate temporary signs for the direction of traffic and on -site parking shall be provided by the applicant. The signs, location ana content to be as required by the Traffic Division of the Police Department. 9. If applicable, the applicant shall submit to the Police Department a request to operate "games.of chance" for their review and approval prior to the event. 10. The applicant shall provide for clean-up of the area after -closing of the event. 11. Any outside cooking facilities shall be approved as to type ana location by the Fire Department prior to the event. 12. A certificate to operate shall be issuea by the Department of Development Services prior to operation of the event. 13. An area shall be designea ana roped off for beer and wine, controlled by a security person with signs. The applicant should check with the Police Department for particulars prior to the event. AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Evans, Vincent, Vogelsang NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT— -None LOT LINE ADJUSZMENT NO. 84-4 Applicant: Kaiser Development Company • To permit a lot line ne adjustment (Oceanus Drive - approximately 259 ft. west of Graham). The applicant's request was introduces by Chairman Smith who stated that this request is categorically exempt, Class. 15, under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June Fifteen Page Fifteeneen The board members reviewed the location of the lot line adjustment consisting of 636.84 ft. to be adjusted between Parcel No. 1 (AP145-014-42) and Parcel No. 2 (AP145-014-33). Mr. Joe Hartge, representing the application, was informed that all conditions of the approved tract map (No. 8688) would remain applicable. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-4 WAS APPROVED AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: FINDING FOR APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment is consistent with the criteria outlined in Section 9811.3.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Lot Line Adjustment to the Department of Development Services. 2. All previous conditions of approval for Tract 8688 shall • remain in effect. 3. The plan received June 1, 1984 shall be the approved layout. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent, Vogelsang NOES: None ABSTAIN: - None ABSENT: None SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-8 Applicant: Mr. Lenny Mazzotti To permit a proposed 28 ft. x 43 ft. concrete patio for Mazzotti's Italian Food Restaurant located at 412 Walnut Street. The board members reviewea Mr. Mazzotti's amenaed site,plan requesting an addition at the rear of the property for a patio area for. waiting patrons in lieu of a parking lot as originally approved. Staff informed all concerned that the applicant has made the necessary arrangements for parking with the Redevelopment Agency as required. • Mr. Mazzotti was informea that -the approval of his administrative review would expire on July 31, 1964, ana that -15- BZA 6/27/84 w H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments June 27, 1984 Page Sixteen as building permits were not issued he may wish to apply for an extension. ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECONDED BY SMITH, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-8 WAS GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS, SUCCEEDED BY VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The patio area shown on site plan received and dated June 13, 1984, shall be the approved layout. This plan amends Administrative Review No. 83-55. 2. In lieu of providing required onsite parking, the property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency. Said agreement shall be received prior to issuance of permits for any portion of the proposed project. AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent, Vogelsang NOES: None ABSTAIN: None • ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-54 ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME To permit a two (2) ft. encroachment into the required 22 ft. garage setback (17071 Bolero Lane). ON MOTION BY EVANS AN SECOND BY SMITH, A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME WAS GRANTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vogelsang, Vincent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned to the pre -review meeting on Monday, July 2, 1984, at 10:00 a.m. Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary 40 Board of Zoning Adjustments jms (2162d)