Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-10-03MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6, Civic Center 2000 Main Street - Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1984 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange Pierce, Poe MINUTES: Minutes of the regular meeting of September_12, 1984 APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 84-69 (Cont. from 9/19/84) Applicant: Naugles, Inc. A request to permit construction of an 1,800 Square Foot drive-thru restaurant on property located on the North side of Garfield Avenue approximately 220 feet from centerline of intersection of Beach Boulevard. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Staff reported the City had received a letter from Naugles, Inc., requesting a withdrawal of their application. UPON MOTION OF EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, WITHDRAWAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 84-69 WAS ACCEPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-587 (Cont. from 8/l/84). Applicant: Charles H. Bollman A request to permit consolidation of two (2) lots at 7151 Garfield Avenue (North side of Garfield Avenue East of Stewart Street). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Minutes, H..B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Two Ms. Pierce -reported the applicant had requested a continuance to the meeting of November 711 1984., UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-587 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER_7,,1984, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange - NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-55 (Cont. from 9/19f 84) ---=-- Applicant: Musil Perkowitz Ruth, Inc. A request to permit a decrease in size of Building H and add proposed new Building I for total increased square footage of 10,400; Building N, 4,000 Square Feet; and Building 0, 16,800 Square Feet to a previously approved site plan. Subject property located on .is the North side of Warner Avenue approximately 350 feet East of Golden West Street at 7201 Warner Avenue. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 83-49 approved December 31, 1984. Staff reported this application had been continued to allow the applicant to submit a new site plan for_the-entire development. The new site plan shows different parking.ancl'Ms. Pierce has contacted the Architect's office for" clari_fication'. _. Les Evans broached the problem of driveways opening onto busy streets and stated the applicant had three driveway openings in 1,100 feet of frontage. The Board was also concerned about traffic circulation and turning radius space in the development. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-55 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The floor plans and elevations received and dated July 24, 1984, shall be the approved layout for Building I. 2. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifi- cations described herein: a. Elimination of easterly driveway. -2- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Three b. Revised parking and turn around dt location of Building 0. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indi- cate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. C. Exterior elevations for review and approval by the Department of Development Services for N, 0 and K. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire`Department. 5. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 6. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed within Building I pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 7. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed within Building 0 pursuant to Fire Department regulations, or fire separation walls shall be constructed. 8. There shall be no outside storage. 9. All outside storage shall be removed from the commercial center site prior to first final inspection of Buildings I, N, or O. 10. All signs shall comply with the approved planned sign program for the commercial center. 11. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 12. Natural gas shall.be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. -3- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning -Adjustments October 3, 1984 - Page Four - 13. Low -volume heads shall be used on all -spigots -and -water faucets. 14. If lighting is -included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All out- side lighting shall be -directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 15. If foil--type--insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type -shal-l-be-installed as -approved -by the Building Division. AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange NOES: -None - ABSENT Vogelsang. - LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-11 Tait and Associates; -Inc. A request -to -permit a lot line -adjustment of Parcels 7, 8 and 9 of Parcel Map-82-560. Subject property is located on the North side of Warner Avenue approximately 924 feet easterly of Golden West Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class -5-, -- California Environmental Quality Act,- 1970.- _ Ms. Pierce reported that representatives of Musil Perkowitz Ruth, Inc., Messrs. Perkowitz_and Christensen; were present -since Lot Line Adjustment-No.-84-11 was in -conjunction with'Administrative Review No. 84-55. She reported that Building O sits on its own parcel, but Building N is part of --the area -with Parcel --I.._ Staff has no problem with meeting the--lot-line-adjustment. Les Evans stressed the point .that. the --Board was --approving a -.-lot line adjustment- and -,not a _parcel map. - UPON MOTION -BY EVANS-AND SECOND BY VINCENT, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-11 WAS -APPROVED WITH THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS -FOR, APPROVAL: 1. The lot line adjustment -is consistent with the criteria out- lined in Section-9811.3.1 of-the.Huntington.Beach Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: - 1. The plan received September 14, 1984, shall be the approved layout for Parcels 7, 8 and 9 of Parcel Map No. 82-560-. J -4- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Five 2. The applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Lot Line Adjustment to the Department of: Development Services. 3. All previous Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 82-560 shall remain in effect. AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-16 (Cont. from 9/26/84) Applicant: Randy Leona (Delton Leasing) A request to permit construction of equipment shed addition to back of existing building on property located at 17891 Jamestown Lane (West side of Jamestown Lane approximately 140 feet North of, Windfield Drive). = This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Susan Pierce reported this application had been continued to give the applicant an opportunity to be present. Thisris, an --industrial site with all parking at rear of the building. This, storage shed was constructed without a building permit and was attached to another building not belonging to the applicant. The site plan amendment would have to be filed for his property and Staff recom- mends that the Board not approve the request on the basis that it is not architecturally compatible with other building, trash storage area is non -conforming with fire regulations, and handicap parking spaces still will not satisfy the Code requirements. Daryl Smith mentioned•the shed was of wooden material and that the City was attempting to maintain industrial areas with nice buildings. Mr. Leong stated the building had not been painted because he would have to rebuild it and add a third wall but,when completed, should be an acceptable structure. Tom Poe.of the Fire Department stressed the fact the building would have to be a non-combustible structure to be acceptable. After further discussion, the applicant requested a continuance to work out problems with Staff members. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY STRANGE, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-16 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 17, 1984, WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang -5- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Six SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-19 (Cont-'. from 9/26/84)--- Applicant: Schurgin Development A request to permit main entrance modification, relocation of trash area, relocation of parking spaces displaced by transformers and new trash areas, and expansion -of Building ".C". Subject property is located on the West side of Beach ­Boulevard approximately 270 feet South of intersection of Main Street and Beach Boulevard. This request is covered by Categorical'Exemption; Class 5,- _ California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Pierce reported this request had been continued to give the applicant an opportunity to meet with the_City Engineer. She pointed out the request had -been modified and the Board would only be taking action on the main -entrance driveway. The driveway will continue to provide one entrance and two exit lanes and Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued only until -parking reaches 229 spaces. Les Evans stated both the City and CalTrans would be satisfied with a forty foot (40') drive opening -of radius type.--The-applicant has also asked CalTrans---Tor removal of-twentylfeet (201) of the median and CalTrans has approved left turns out of the project. The - applicant was not present. - UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-19 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Site Plan Amendment No. 84=19 shall be approved for main entrance change only. This application amends Administrative Review No. 83-72 approved site' -plan:` 2. Driveway entrance shall continue to provide one entrance and two exit lanes. 3. Certificates of Occupancy shall be permitted until parking requirements reach the 229 spaces as provided. 4. Driveway shall be forty feet (401) in width and of radius type construction. AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang -6- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Seven CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-59 Applicant: Richard C. Chacon A request to permit a reduction in the minimum open space dimension from twenty feet (201) to fifteen feet (151) on property located at 4541 Operetta Drive (North side of Operetta Drive approximately sixty feet (60') East of Fantasia Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Pierce reported that when this house was built iri the 1960's, a twenty -foot (201) setback was required in the front and fifteen feet (151) in the rear yard. The house was constructed with one wing extending to the back and the applicant wishes to build a section adjacent to this area with a fifteen foot (151) setback from the rear. The minimum open space area will still be met and the structure will be architecturally compatible with existing. Daryl Smith opened the Public Hearing and the applicant, Richard Chacon, was present. He had no questions and there were no other persons present to speak, so Mr. Smith closed the Public Hearing. UPON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-59 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Granting of reduction in open space minimum dimension will not reduce the required total open space area (900 Square Feet) . 2. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order -to preserve -the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 84-59 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 5. The siting of the'home restricts future additions in com- pliance with the -Code. -7- 10/3/84 - BM Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Eight CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: r 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 12, 1984, shall be the approved layout. 2. Proposed structure shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits. 4. There shall be no further outward expansions/additions. AYES: Evans, Smith, Vincent, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Vogelsang CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-54 (AR NO. 84-62) (TPM NO. 84-594) Applicant: Richard A. Hanson A request to -permit reduction of required.parking spaces from twenty- four (24) spaces to seven (7) spaces, elimination of corner cutoff for buildings adjacent to intersecting driveways, -and buildings to encroach a maximum of five feet (5') into five foot. (5') setback from public easement. -Property is located on the East side of Sampson Street approximately 800 feet South of,Slater Avenue. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5,. California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. It was reported by Staff that -this -property is located in M-1.Zone which allows warehouse facilities; --however, mini -warehouse does not have a category in the Code. There is no formula for computing parking spaces required but Staff has based their computations on the number of cubicles proposed, approximately-940. On this basis, twenty (20) spaces would be required. Staff fails -to find any land -related hardship but the applicant does have a�twenty-five foot (251) water easement on the rear of the lot. Staff would also require corner cutoffs. The caretaker's unit has not been included in the parking count. The project will have a security gate. After a general discussion, Daryl Smith opened the Public Hearing. The applicant, Richard A. Hanson, was -present and he stated he had developed several mini -warehouses -in Orange and San Diego Counties. He felt that twenty (20) spaces were far more than would be required because this type of business -does not have people "stacked up waiting to get into the park. They have an average of four to five people and hour coming into the storage facilities. -8- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Nine Les Evans left- the meeting at this point. Mr.. Smith mentioned the possibility of parking on the water ease- ment. A general discussion followed concerning -this question and the applicant requested a continuance to further explore the possi- bility with the Public Works Department. There were no other persons present to speak so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY STRANGE, AND WITH CONCURRENCE OF APPLICANT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-54 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1984, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Vincent, Strange, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: Evans, Vogelsang ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-62 (CE NO. 84-54) (TPM NO. 84-594) Applicant: Richard A. Hanson A request to permit development of a mini -storage facility on the East side of Sampson Street approximately 800 feet South of Slater Avenue. This request is covered by a previous environmental determination. UPON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY STRANGE, AND WITH CONCURRENCE OF APPLICANT, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 84-62 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1984, TO COINCIDE WITH CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-54, WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Vincent, Strange, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: Evans, Vogelsang TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-594 (CE NO. 84-54) (AR NO. 84-62) Applicant: Richard A. Hanson A request to permit consolidation of Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Parcel Map No. 83-581. Subject property is located on the East side of Sampson Street approximately 800 feet South of Slater Avenue. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. -9- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Ten Ms. Pierce reported -a previously recorded Parcel Map had been presented which shows existing building, landscaped area, twenty- five foot (251) wide ingress and egress, reciprocal parking area, and that Staff has no problem with approval if there are no problems engineering wise. The applicant, Richard A. Hanson, stated he had contacted the Water Department and they wanted relocation of one line. He said he found no problem with conditions which he -had received -from Planning. UPON MOTION BY'VINCENT AND SECOND BY SMITH, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-594 WAS APPROVED WITH THE'VOLLOWING FINDINGS -AND-_CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed consolidation of five .(5) parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and -shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of land use. 3. The property was previously studied for this_ intensity, of land use at the time the land use designation for community business district allowing industrial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications -on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. = CONDITIONS OF -APPROVAL: 1. The tentative parcel map receivedbythe Department of Development Services on August 28,.1984,-shall be, the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel -map shall be filed with and approved by the Depart- ment of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder:. -10- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Eleven 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington,'Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 4. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 5. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 6. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services. 7. All previous conditions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 83-581 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 80-560 shall apply. AYES: Vincent, Strange, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: Evans, Vogelsang SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-15 Applicant: Burger King (James R. Kent) A request to change site plan, exterior elevations, and relocate order station on property at the Southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and McDonald Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Pierce reported that the City had recently granted this appli- cant a one (1) year extension of time for their project. Since receiving that extension, they have requested an amendment to the site plan and wish to relocate a covered canopy order station which would be oriented to the residential area. If the Board should approve this project, Burger -King would still maintain eighty-six (86) parking spaces by inclusion of credit for the parking lane. Staff would not recommend approving the revised elevations. They have deleted the mansard type roof over the addition which we would like to have retained. Staff does -not feel the passive speaker system is now needed since the speaker has been relocated away from the residential area. The applicant's representatives, Ernest Clark, Architect,'and James Kent, were -present: Mr. Clark stated Burger King had been very pleased with visual effect of the proposed structure and -11- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H-. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments - October 3, 1984 Page Twelve would like the Board to find it acceptable rather than maintaining the mansard roof. He stated there would be no mechanical equipment or motors on the roof of the addition. Ms. Pierce stressed that driveway striping and "DO"NOT ENTER" signs should be installed at appropriate locations. UPON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY STRANGE, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-15 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: _ 1. The clouded areas depicted on a site plan received and dated August 28, 1984, shall be the approved layout. This plan amends Use Permit No. 83-36 which expires September 7, 1985. 2. All previous conditions of Use Permit No. 83-36 shall be applicable with the exception of No.-3. 3. The proposed additionshall be architecturally compatible with. s existing structures. ' -Roof treatment-- shall- be extended to rear "- addition. 4. Forty-five (45) parking spaces are required by Use Permit No. 83-36. A credit of seven-(7) •spaces has-been give'n'to the drive-thru lane. The remainder (38) shall_be as depicted on Use- Permit - No. 8 3- 36 site_plan-. 5. Parking spaces -on the- North ---and South property- lines,- which -a"re more- -than 110 feet" from -ultimate right-of-way, shall be designated as employee parking spaces. 6. Speaker system shall conform to the Noise Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach. 7. -Traffic-flow-around the building -shall be designated'as "ONE-WAY- ONLY_' 8. "DO NOT ENTER" signs- shalf'be posted -adjacent. to drive-thru and exit lanes. - AYES:- Vincent, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Evans, Vogelsang -12- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Thirteen SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-17 Applicant: HCH'and Associates A request to permit addition of 760 Square Foot building and reloca- tion of trash enclosure as depicted on previously approved site plan (Administrative Review No. 84-27). Subject property is located at 5832 Bolsa Avenue (South side of Bolsa Avenue approximately 650 feet West of Springdale Street). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. It was reported by Ms. Pierce that the Board of Zoning Adjustments had recently approved this project but the applicant wishes to relocate a trash area and generator building. He has submitted a revised plan depicting landscaping around the trash area but Staff would recommend that the opening be oriented to the back. Mike Strange stated the Code would not allow trash door openings to face a public street and Daryl Smith said it should not open to adjacent residential property., The gates would have to face a southerly direction. The applicant's representative, Mr. Scott, stated the generator building would be 10' x 10' and architecturally compatible with other structure. UPON MOTION BY VINCENT AND SECOND BY STRANGE, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-17 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, WITH THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The trash area location and generator building, as shown on a site plan received and dated September 27, 1984, shall be the approved layout. This plan amends Administrative Review No. 84-27. 2. The trash enclosure gates shall be oriented to the rear of the site. 3. The proposed generator building'shall be architecturally compatible with the new two-story building. 4. All conditions of Administrative Review No.*84-27 are appli- cable to this amendment. AYES: Vincent, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Evans, Vogelsang -13- 10/3/84 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning•Adjustments:- October 3, 1984- Page Fourteen SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-18 Applicant: Thirtieth Street Architects-. _ A request to permit a site plan revision to approved Administrative Review -No. 84-13 and to permit,joint use parking on -property -located on the South side of Newman Avenue approximately 286 feet East of center line of Beach Boulevard. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act,.1970. -. Susan Pierce stated this applicant had appeared before the Board of Zoning Adjustments in May, 1984; for -approval of.a.medical office building with a- reduction in --parking which.- was" subsequently appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant has now come back to-this.Board requesting approval of a revised site plan for -Administrative Review No. 84-13 which would allow reciprocal parking for three -buildings. The Architects for both projects arranged reciprocal parking for all three buildings and this request should have--been.-for reciprocal parking rather than joint use. A parcel map should be filed.. The: -Planning Commission granted a park- ing variance and parking requirements are being met. The applicant's_representatives;-Harold:Graham-and Jerry.,Dunhill, were present: -Mr _Graham stated they would have a gated entry for the project. Les Evans returned to the meeting at this -'point. A lengthy discus- sion followed concerning removal of the temporary building, widths of lanes for fire access, turning-radius,_,etc:- Public Works and Fire Departments -had not reviewed the ---site plan,. _ DARYL SMITH--MOVED--THAT APPROVAL OF -,SITE --PLAN- - AMENDMENT NO-.: 84-18 . . BE BASED -ON REVIEW AND APPROVAL:-OF:PUBLIC; WOKS AND FIRE _:DEPARTMENTS AND MEETING -THEIR REQUIREMENTS -AND CONDITONS. MOTION -.WAS -SECONDED BY MICHAEL STRANGE.. MOTION:FAILED_BY.-THE-FOLLOWING VOTE:, -- AYES: Smith, Strange NOES: Vincent-- - - ABSTAIN:.Evans = _ ABSENT: Vogelsang -- UPON MOTION BY VINCENT AND.SECOND BY--SMITH-,--AND WITH CONCURRENCE OF APPLICANT, -SITE -PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-18_.WAS CONTINUED -TO THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1984, BY THE FOLLOWING.VOTE:_., -14- 10/3/84 - -- BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments October 3, 1984 Page Fifteen AYES: Smi th', Vincenl , SI rango NOES: None ABSTAIN: Evans ABSENT: Vogelsang There was no further business so meeting was adjourned to the pre -review meet ng on Monday, October 8; 1984, at 10:00 A.M. Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh i -15- 10/3/84 - BZA