Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-05-151 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS, Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 1985 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Cranmer, Evans,'Godfrey, Smith, Poe STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Pierce MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1985, WERE . =ROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Poe AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED: REVOCATION OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 85-1 Applicant: Ronald L. Judd and Joan K. Collins Ms. Pierce stated one of the applicants, Joan Collins Judd, had telephoned to ask for a continuance to the meeting of May 22, 1985, since neither she nor her husband could be present at this meeting. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY EVANS, THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST WAS DENIED,.BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-160 Applicant:_ B. G. Williams A request to create three (3) parcel subdivision for commercial and residential purposes at 20800 Beach Boulevard (East side of Beach Boulevard approximately twenty feet (201) North of Atlanta Avenue). Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 2 This request is covered by Categorical -Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Staff reported this request had been continued from the May 1, 1985, meeting to allow the applicant to be present and also to meet with the Director of Development Services. The Director, James Palin, has requested that the Board not approve the Tentative Parcel Map as originally submitted. Ms. Pierce read a memorandum from Mr. Palin which is as follows: "TO: Board of Zoning Adjustments FROM: James W. Palin, Director Development Services SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map DATE: May 14, 1985 No. 85-160 The subject site is currently zoned C4, Highway Commercial, and R2-PD, Medium Density - Planned Development. Whenever possible, it is the policy of this Department to recommend the pursuit of planned residential development standards on a minimum of five (5) acres. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Adjustments is requested to deny the Tentative Parcel Map as submitted or require all R2-PD property fronting Beach Boulevard to be a minimum of five (5) acres per parcel. JWP:SP:jh" Staff said Conditions of Approval had been prepared in the event the Board did not choose to follow the Director's recommendations. Les Evans asked if the City had attempted to work with the developer on this project and Ms. Pierce said they had. However, the developer still felt the map should remain the way it was originally submitted. The applicant, B. G. Williams, was present and said they were attempting to correct a ill which had been previously established. He further stated they were attempting to create a twenty -foot (201) easement for ingress and egress to the property. Mr. Williams also said he had previously met with Mr. Palin and the original agreement was not this way; that this must be a second approach. There was no one else present who wished to speak for or against this project. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-160 WAS DENIED BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR MINIMUM FIVE (5) ACRE PARCEL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -2- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 3 AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None Ms. Pierce reminded the Board and the applicant of the appeal period and that, if appealed, the request would by-pass the Planning Commission and go directly to the City Council. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-21 AND USE PERMIT NO. 85-16 Applicant: Taco Bell CE REQUEST: A request to permit automobile overhang into required landscape planter. UP REQUEST: To add 858 Square Feet to an existing drive-thru restaurant and provide inside dining. Subject property is located at 19002 Beach Boulevard (Southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue). These requests are covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Staff reported this is a drive-thru restaurant which the Taco Bell Corporation has acquired and wishes to change to more closely reflect their corporate image. They have proposed an addition to the southern and eastern portions of the building and would have to provide different parking arrangements. Security Pacific Bank has an egress to Beach Boulevard across this property. -Staff has looked at the proposed plan and made suggestions. Based on these findings and conditions, Staff could recommend approval. Daryl Smith opened the Public Hearing for both Conditional Exception No. 85-21 and Use Permit No. 85-16. The applicant's representative, Bob Lewis, was present and said the conditions were acceptable. Les Evans objected to granting this conditional exception because it would create more circulation problems rather than alleviating those which already exist at the site. Daryl Smith shared the same concerns as well as those relative to landscaping. Ms. Pierce assured the Board landscaping requirements were being met. Tom Poe asked about the location of the trash enclosure and was informed it would be moved. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so both Public Hearings were closed. -3- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 4 UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-21 AND USE PERMIT NO. 85-16 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-21: 1.• Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, the existing drive -through restaurant and existing lane preclude total compliance with S9792.10, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. 2. The granting of a conditional exception is -necessary in Eder to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-21 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-21: 1. The site plan received and dated May 3, 1985, shall be the approved layout. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 85-16: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. The use is an expansion of an existing use. 1 -4- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PEPMIT NO. 85-16: 1. The site plan received and dated May 3, 1985, and the floor plans and elevations received and dated April 17, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. The southern Beach Boulevard driveway is restricted to and shall be posted "ENTER ONLY". The northern Beach Boulevard driveway is restricted to and shall be posted "EXIT ONLY" and "RIGHT TURN ONLY". 3. Patio dining is not permitted. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant sha submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. All'signs shall comply with Article 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 7. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 8. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 9. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 10. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 11. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. -5- 5/15/85 --BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 6 AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Poe NOES: Evans, Smith ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-22 Applicant: Josephus J. Volt A request to permit a reduction in open space dimension feet (201) to 16'-4" at 16352 Redlands Lane (East side Lane at intersection with Edgemont Drive). from twenty of Redlands This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Pierce stated this is an existing residence which was built with a side entry garage at fifteen foot (151) setback in lieu of the ten foot (10') required setback. The applicant would like to make an addition to the rear of their home by expanding the dining room and kitchen area. To meet the letter of the law with the required .twenty foot (201) dimension, they could not do it. The property owners do, however, exceed the minimum open space requirement, and they have submitted a petition from adjacent neighbors who agree to the six foot (61) addition. Staff would recommend denial of this project because there does not appear to be a land -related hardship. The Public Hearing was opened by Daryl Smith. The applicant, Josephus J. Holt, and the property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Arthur L. Reeves were present. Mr. Holt said he had originally presented a sketch which did not show the driveway and that Staff had been very helpful in trying to work out a solution. Mr. Reeves reiterated the fact neighbors had no objection to the expansion as now proposed. There was no one else present to speak so the Public Hearing was closed.. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-22 WAS APPROVED WITH THE ALTERNATE ACTION PRESENTED BY STAFF WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Granting of reduction in open space minimum dimension will note reduce the required total open space area (900-Square Feet).- 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property with regard to a single family dwelling with side entry garage at a fifteen foot (15") setback in lieu of a minimum ten foot (10') setback, the strict application of the -6- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 7 Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. 3. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-20 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 5. The granting of the conditional exception will not adv^-q-=ly affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 19, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. The proposed addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing structure. 3. No other additions which would reduce the open space area requirement shall be permitted. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Smith, Poe NOES: Godfrey ABSENT; None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-23 Applicant: Bruce Pangborn A request to permit room addition to encroach five feet (5') into required ten foot (10') rear yard setback on property located at 8092 Indianapolis Avenue approximately 610 feet West of Farnsworth Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class,5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Staff said the applicant -had submitted a site plan which is not accurate and we have indicated the correct dimensions in ,red. The proposed addition would encroach into the rear yard setback. There is an -alley at the rear of the property and a flood control channel to the West.' The applicant could situate the addition on the lot at two other -locations. It is the City's position that there not be an encroachment into setbacks adjacent to streets or alleys and Staff -7- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning,Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 8 would recommend denial of this request for this reason. If the Board should approve this request, the applicant should construct a forty-two inch (42") high wall to enclose the required open space. Daryl Smith opened the Public Hearing and the applicant, Bruce Pangborn, was present. Mr. Pangborn said the only place the addition could be made was off the dining room as proposed; otherwise, it would have to be accessed through the Master Bedroom. There was no one else present to speak so the Public Hearing was closed. Daryl Smith said he felt the setbacks definitely created a problem in the shaping of the lot and, because the open space requirt ,nts had been met in the rear yard, it should not be necessary to build the enclosure wall in the front. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE,_ CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-23 WAS APPROVED WITH THE ALTERNATE ACTION PRESENTED BY STAFF, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1.' Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, the irregular rear property line adjacent to an alley turnaround separating residential and open space properties, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. 2. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one -or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-23 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect -the General Plan of the -City -of Huntington -Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The floor plans and elevations received and dated April 22, 1985, shall be the approved layout. -8- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 9 2. A site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Accurately dimensioned. 3. The proposed addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing structure. 4. No other additions shall be permitted. AYES: Evans, Smith, Poe NOES: Cranmer, Godfrey ABSENT: None. USE PERMIT NO. 85-22 (NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-19) Applicant: Chevron U.'S.A., Inc. A request to permit installation of a contained vapor combustor at an existing oil company terminal facility located at 17881 Gothard Street (West side of Gothard Street at intersection of Talbert Avenue). This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 85-19. Staff reported the applicant had submitted plans showing the combustor tower to be approximately fifty feet (501) in height. The project is located in M1-CD Zone. M1 is light industrial and -CD is commercial development. M1 Zone requires any structure over forty-two inches (42") in height be set back 20 feet. They also will need six foot (61) landscaping buffer along the park area. The aerial photograph submitted appears to have sufficient parking for -meeting requirements. If approved by the Board, the City Engineer has asked for installation of street improvements along Gothard Street and Talbert Avenue. The applicant's representative, Craig Watkins, was present. He stressed the importance of the burner in reducing the emissions. He stated Chevron would be expending a considerable amount',of money to protect the air quality and he did not feel the company would want to make the additional expenditures for relocating the fence, installing the additional landscaping along a park which was dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach originally by Chevron, and installing the street improvements mentioned. Nancy Wolff was also present from Chevron. -9- 5/15/85 BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 10 After a general discussion concerning these items, Mr. Watkins requested a continuance of two (2) weeks to confer with the Chevron hierarchy on the proposed conditions. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, USE PERMIT NO. 85-22 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF MAY 29, 1985, AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None .USE PERMIT NO. 85-23 AND USE PERMIT NO. 85-24 Applicant: Jin-Yuan Liu A request to permit construction of two (2) fourplex luxury units with enclosed garages to be located at 4801 and 4811 Heil Avenue (North side of street approximately 951 feet East of Algonquin Street). These requests are covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Pierce stated these fourplex units would be located along an arterial highway. The plans meet the City's requirements except the driveway radius needs to be twenty-seven feet (271) in width. The Public'Hearing was opened by Mr. Smith for both Use Permit No. 85-23 and Use Permit No. 85-24, and the applicant, Jin-Yuan Liu was present. The applicant had no further questions and there was no one else present to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY CRANMER, USE PERMIT NO. 85-23 AND USE PERMIT NO. 85-24 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in,the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such'use or building. -10- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 11 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Funtington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated May 10, 1985, shall be the approved layout subject,to revision. depicting a twenty-seven foot (271) wide driveway. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map creating subject parcel. Said map shall be L •vrded prior to final inspection. In the alternative, proof of creation prior to January 16, 1958, may be submitted. 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 4-. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. 5. Hose bibb and gas stub shall be provided in each patio area. 6. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 9. The structures on the subject properties, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 10. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. -11- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 12 11. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 12. The subject property shall enter into an irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement between the subject site and adjacent property ("mirror image" property). A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Development Services prior to final inspection. 13. This approval is null and void without the construction of the "mirror image" on the adjacent parcel. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-5 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-17 Applicant: The Kar Kare Company A request to permit a seasonal parking lot from May 28 to September 13, 1985, located on the North side of Pacific Coast Highway between Second Street and Third Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption,,Class 11, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Ms. Pierce stated this project is located within the coastal zone and, at this time, the City does not have authority to approve until the Coastal Development Permit is approved. Notices were sent to property owners and occupants within one hundred feet (-1001),but a Public,Hearing is not required. The applicant needs to 'submit a site plan showing the full parking lot and indicating the location of the parking fee collection area., There shall be no stacking of vehicles on Pacific Coast Highway and the lot may be open from May 26.through September 22, 1985. The applicant's representative, Ed_Bonnani, was present. The . applicant stated he had a lease agreement with the.City to operate the lot and agreed to the conditions as amended. .UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-5 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-17 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,.BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -12- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 13 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-5: 1. The Coastal Development Permit application is consistent with the C2 suffix, the Downtown Specific Plan, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 2. The proposed temporary use is located at a site where the existing street pattern is consistent with the Certified Land Use Plan. 3. The development increases the public access to the beach and, therefore, conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. 4. Because the temporary use enhances beach access, the project proposed by the Coastal Development Permit application conforms with the applicable plans, policies, requirements, and standards of the Certified Land Use Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-17: 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. A fully dimensioned site plan in compliance with Article 979. b. Location of cash booth 2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the -Ordinance Code (5.9730.56, 5.9730.57, S.9730.80). 3. No stacking of vehicles shall be permitted on -Pacific Coast Highway. 4. Upon notice from the Police Department that stacking of vehicles on Pacific Coast Highway is becoming a traffic hazard-, -the applicant shall close the Third Street entrance and. relocate it*subject to review and approval by.the Department of Development Services. 5. This approval is valid from the expiration of the appeal period - May 26, 1985, through September 22, 1985. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None -13- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 14 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-6 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-18 Applicant: Parking Company of America A request to permit a seasonal parking lot at the Northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 11, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Staff said this was an application for a seasonal parking lot which has existed at this location for a number of years. There shall be no stacking of cars on Newland Street or on Pacific Coast Highway and the ticket taking booth will have to be located further . •o the center of the lot. The applicant's representative, Lyle Overby, was present and agreed to the conditions. Staff reminded the applicant his appeal period would not have expired by the beginning of the Memorial Day Holiday weekend. A representative of the State Parks, Jack Ruggenbuck, also stated they wanted the lot secured at night as it has been in the past. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERM NO. 85-6 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-18 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-6: 1. The Coastal Development Permit application is consistent with the C2 suffix, the Downtown Specific Plan, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 2. The proposed temporary use is located at a site where the existing street pattern is consistent with the Certified Land Use Plan. 3. The development increases the public access to the beach and, therefore, conforms to the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. 4. Because the temporary use enhances beach access, the project proposed by the Coastal Development Permit application conforms with the applicable plans, policies, requirements, and standards of the Certified Land Use Plan. -14--5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE I�E::VI E:W NO. 85-18: 1. The site plan received and dated April 24, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code (5.9730.56, S.9730.57, S.9730.80). 3. No stacking of vehicles shall be permitted on Pacific Coast Highway or Newland Street. 4. This approval is valid from the expiration of the appeal period - May 26,'1985, through September 22, 1985. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-16 Applicant: Suresh C. Patel A request to convert carport structure to two (2) suites to be located at 19360 Beach Boulevard (East side of Beach Boulevard approximately 540 feet North of Yorktown Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Staff reported the applicant had submitted revised plans yesterday to take the structure originally approved for carport area and convert it to suites on First and Second Floors. The revised plan still satisfies the required parking spaces. Fence would have to be reduced to forty-two inches (42") in height. Ms. Pierce reminded the Board of the lady, Julia Miller, who had appeared at an earlier meeting to express her concerns. Ms. Miller was notified of today's hearing but has failed to appear. Staff would recommend that the Site Plan Amendment submitted May 14, 1985, be the approved plan with dimensions to be verified by the applicant. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-16 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, -BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received May 14, 1985, shall be'the approved site plan for this amendment to Administrative Review No. 84-87. -15- 5/15/85 - BZA Minutes, 11. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 15, 1985 Page 16 2. The clouded areas on floor plans and elevations received May 8, 1985, shall be the only approved amendments. 3. All fencing is subject to setback regulations and building permits. 4. No other amendments to Administrative Review No. 84-87 shall be permitted. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None REVOCATION OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 85-1 Licensee: Ronald L. Judd and Joan K. Collins GENERAL REASON: Violation of Section 9730.36(h), Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, referring to parking of commercial vehicle or equipment. GENERAL LOCATION: 20911 National Lane, Huntington Beach. Staff reported the neighborhood complainant had not appeared at today's hearing and Don Shaw, Land Use Technician, was unavailable, as well as the licensee not being present. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, REVOCATION OF�HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 85-1 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF MAY 22, 1985, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: There was no -further business to be discussed. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, THE REGULAR MEETING GF MAY 15 1985, WAS ADJOURNED TO THE MONDAY MORNING STUDY SESSION ON MAY 20, 1985, WITH PUBLIC POSTING OF AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Smith, Poe NOES: Godfrey ABSENT• None Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh -16- 5/15/85 - BZA