Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-09-11r� MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1985 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Hess, Abramowitz MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY CRANMER, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1985, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-208 Applicant: Lawrence L. Truman/RMG Engineering, Inc. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY EVANS, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-208 WAS CONTINUED, AT THE REQUEST OF THE .APPLICANT, TO THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1985, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. Applicant: bewayne Brown 85-42 (Cont. from 8/28/85) A request to construct a 6,876 Square Foot auto repair facility in a M-1 Zone. Subject property is located on the North side of Burton Drive between Griffin Lane and Sampson Lane. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 11 California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 2 Scott Hess stated the proposed building will be used for industrial purposes and the applicant has provided fourteen (14) parking spaces and sufficient landscaping. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. It was determined that an extra parking space was not required in addition to the handicapped space so the item was deleted from the suggested conditions. The applicant, Dewayne Brown, was present but stated the Architect, Don Hartfelder, would like to review the radius cutoffs suggested by the Board. After reviewing it, the applicant agreed to the conditions. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY CRANMER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-42 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Fully dimensioned site plan b. One (1) handicapped parking space (19' x 141) C. Wheel stops d. Radius cut-off at the two (2) front planter areas e. Trash enclosure with view -obscuring gate 2. Prior to issuance of. building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 3. Landscaping shall comply with S. 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 1 -2- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. A. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 3 4. Special architectural treatment shall be provided on the rear building walls which are exposed to abutting properties. Such treatment is subject to approval by the Department of Development Services. a. All colors shall be earthtone. b. The overhead doors shall be painted with baked -on enamel or similar with a color which contrasts with the building. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (2"). 7. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (27') in width. 8. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 9. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. 10. Total office area shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross building area. 11. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 12. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 13. All building spoils, such as -unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 14. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 15. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. -3- 9/11/85 --BZA Minutes, September Page 4 H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments 11, 1985 AYES: Cranmer, NOES: None ABSENT: None Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-48 Applicant: Dgnald._R. Nuss A request to delete two (2) parking spaces of a newly constructed 25,169 Square .Foot office building (23,369 Square Foot office and 1,800 Square'Foot'retail)`with;eighty=seven-:(87).parking spaces. Subject property is located'at 15922 Pacific Coast Highway (North side of'Pacific Coast.'Highway�near Mariner's Drive). This request is' covered' by;;Categorical, Exeiption, Class 1,, " California Env ironmental',`,Qua'lity`Act, 1984'. Staff reminded the Board this particular project had previously been before the' Board'with"other`'requests,. ' ' The project was constructed last year under an Administrative Review request and this Conditional Exception is for the reduction of the required twenty-seven (27) parking spaces to twenty-five (25) spaces. The deletion of_the,two (),.spaces will be detrimental to the adjoining area and'Staff is recommending denial. Upon questioning, by ,Daryl..SmitE', Mr. Hess said the only way the applicant could comply on- Ei6''parking would Ibe by converting the 1,800 Square Feet,.of.commercial.,use to office space. The -Public Hearing wasp.opened and,,the.applicant, Donald R. Nuss, was present. Mr. Nuss explained that several changes had been implemented by CalTrans,which,created problems with ingress and egress from the location; that people'exiting were not legally allowed to make a left turn, and that they had to go to Seal Beach Boulevard and then come back. He reiterated the problems of the fuel trucks having to back into the property to unload and said having the two (2),parking spaces deleted would help alleviate these problems. Ralph B. Le Mon said he was a resident-of'the-adjacent condominium project and that this building was originally approved by the Planning Commission without any consideration being given to the effect this project would have on the residents,of the condominium tract. Mr. Le Mon further'objected­to the height o'f the building on this parcel, R. C. Gallyon, President of the Huntington Marina Homeowners Association, was present to speak. Mr. Gallyon pointed out that the driveway is a private street and not a public one, and he expressed concerns about defueling of the trucks because of the grade of the 1 -4- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 5 land allowing drainage into the condominium project's drainage system. Mr. Gallyon reiterated the problems created by CalTrans and felt the City should intervene to alleviate this situation. He further stated there is not enough parking at the office building now and deleting two spaces would be a real mistake. Another speaker was Spencer Alter who reinforced the statements made by the previous residents. Mr. Nuss was given an opportunity to reply to the residents and the Public Hearing was then closed by Chairman Smith. This was followed by a general discussion relative to the concerns expressed by the adjacent property owners and residents. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-48 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. The building was approved with proper number of parking spaces for the office and commercial building. 2. The deletion of the parking spaces will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working and living in the vicinity. 3. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-48 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None Chairman Smith asked if the Board wished to take the Benco Development project out of order since there appeared to be many concerned individuals present. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, CONDITIONAL•EXCEPTION NO. 85-54, USE PERMIT NO. 85-47, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-53 WERE HEARD OUT OF AGENDA ORDER, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTF: AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None -5- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page "6 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-54 USE PERMIT NO. 85-47 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-5z3 Applicant;, Benco Devel"opment Group A request to, construct a four ,(4") building, 39,810 Square Foot commercial center with drive-thru restaurant with variance to permit a modified commercial ,center;,main„driveway,entrance, 01" building setback along the,East property Line in lieu of,;the required ten foot (101) setback; and a twenty foot"(20') building encroachment in the required 28 degree sight angle setback at the Southwest corner of the site. Subject property,is located on the,East side of Beach Boulevard approximately 400 feet North of Clay Avenue. This request. is 'covered by Negative Declaration No. 85-53. Staff reported the applicant is proposing four (,4) commercial buildings, one "of which wlll`be a drive-thru restaurant with stacking for six (6) vehicles, on property adjacent to a residential area. The developer is proposing to set Building "B" on the rear property line instead,of honoring the ten foot (10') setback requirement, a deviation" in'the width of the driveway, and sight angle encroachment. As well as concerns of the Redevelopment Agency, Staff has several others such as circulation on the site an the s'ight angle variance and Staff is recommending a thirty foot (30') driveway instead of the twenty-seven foot (27') width. Staff is further recommending a continuance of one or two weeks to allow the developer to prepare new plans. The Public Hearing was opened and Richard"Harlow was present to represent the applicant, Benco Development Group. Mr. Harlow stated the Architect, Steve Ruth, and"Attorney Jerry Bame were also present. Mr. Harlow broached the subject of the additional wall at the -rear of the property and,reminded the Board the developer was supplying 253 parking spaces instead of the required 214 spaces. Jerry Bame, Attorney, stated the developer had cooperated with Staff in an effort to revise the plans to.meet the City's Code requirements, and he suggested reducing the continuance to only one (1) week. The Architect, Steve Ruth, said the ten foot (101) buffer zone would increase the problems, and the noise factor from the equipment would be alleviated by the parapets of the building. He further stated they could install additional landscaping which would buffer the noise. -6- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 7 One of the adjacent residents, Larry Kern, stated one of the major problems was that the residents had not seen the plans and did not know exactly what was being proposed by the developer. Another resident, John Campagne, stated his property abutted the proposed project and he was concerned about the zero setback variance. Mr. Campagne was also concerned with the eight foot (8') proposed wall - whether the six foot (61) existing wall would be torn down and replaced. He was further concerned with the fumes and odors from the drive-thru restaurant, as well as the bright lights which would emanate from the center. Russ Scott said he was also one of the abutting property owners and his concerns were the same as had been expressed by the other owners. A general discussion between the Board members followed and Daryl Smith also suggested a continuance so the developer could meet with the property owners to explain the project. Richard Harlow requested a continuance to the meeting of September 25, 1985, and the Public Hearing was left open until that meeting. Glen Godfrey stated he could not approve the Negative Declaration in its present state and that several additional items should be included such as noise, construction dust, and traffic circulation. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY CRAMMER, AND AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-54, USE PERMIT NO. 85-47, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-53 WERE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1985, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: Evans ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-49 Applicant: Lawrence E. Tieman A request to construct a 1,939 Square Foot, two-story single family residence with a variance to permit a three foot (31), wide main accessway to the front door in lieu of the five foot (51) wide requirement. Subject property is located on the North side of Clay Avenue approximately 195 feet West of Delaware Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported this subject property is located in the Old Town Specific Plan area and, in that zoning, they are required to provide a five foot (5 ) corridor to the main entrance to the dwelling. In -7- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 8 addition, when ,there.is no alley at the rear ,of. the:propertyr,access to a two -car garage, must,be..from the street. The garage must be a minimum of. nineteen ,feet (19' )- in width to meet. the; Code .. requirements which,,in;this particular case, allows only a -three foot (31) side.yard on each side, thereby eliminating the possibility of providing a five foot (51) corridor to the main entrance of the.building. -The applicant cannot conform to both aspects of the Code because the subject property.is only -twenty-five feet;(25') in width;, therefore, Staff is recommending approval. Staff is further recommending a revised plan showing a widened corridor between the Activity Room and the main unit instead of having the doors as shown, that some doors be eliminated, and that a shower not be allowed in this:Activity Room. Staff is also asking that the applicant,sign;an agreement.stating that,this.unit will remain a single family residence only. Daryl Smith said he was aware of the "bootleg units" in the downtown area but he felt the shower could be installed if we received the signed agreement.. . . Glen Godfrey said the Board.had previously reviewed requests where the applicant had to have,access through the garage,because of the narrowness of these lots.,, The Public Hearing was opened and the applicant, Lawrence E. Tieman, was present.. Mr. Tieman said the property is in escrow for sale to Keith White, an Architect. Mr. White stated he would be happy to call the addition a Bedroom rather than a Family'Room but further stated he did not.feel it.was,anyone-'s business how many doors he had on the front of the house - the doors shown are architecturally aesthetic and allow more of the ocean breezes. The Public Hearing was closed since there was no one else present wishing to speak. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-49 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR.APPROVAL: 1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, location and surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of.privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. The parcel is long and narrow, and 3,371 Square Feet in size. -8- 9/11/85 - BZA 1 Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 9 2. The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-49 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated August 8, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. A "Letter of Agreement" shall be signed, notarized and recorded by the property owner assuring that the single family residence will be continuously maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department other than the variances approved herein. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Smith, Poe NOES: Godfrey ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-50 Applicant: Eugene B. Zwick A request to permit encroachment of a garage five feet (5') into the required twenty-two foot (221) setback from the front property line. Subject property is located at 16841 Edgewater Lane (West side of Edgewater Lane approximately 180 feet North of Davenport Drive). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Scott Hess stated the property is located in an Rl-CZ Zone but is Categorically Exempt. Staff has reviewed the subject request and is recommending approval with conditions. There is only a nineteen foot (191) deep parking space inside the garage because of an elevator installation. Staff would recommend an electrical roll -up door and that the construction be architecturally compatible with the existing residence. A further recommendation of Staff would be that all required permits - electrical, building, etc., - be obtained from Development Services Department. -9- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 10 The Public Hearing was opened and the applicant,,Gene Zwick, was present. Mr..,Zwick,explained that, when h,is."res"idence was built twenty years ago, onl a twenty foot (20')"setback.,was required. Mr. Zwick further"stU he ha been unable to park his long car in the garage and,had been forced to park in the.front even before the elevator was installed for his wife. He felt that, by construction of the garage'addit'ion,.he could"rectify this.situation. There was no one else. -present -wishing to speak so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY EVANS'AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-50 WAS DENIED, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL:•,_ 1. Because of the "size, configuration, shape and lack of unique _topographic features of -the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. 2. Since the subject property can be developed within regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights_. 'The -elevator that was constructed in space designated for the ,parking of a vehicle was a hardship of the applicant's own making,.compounded by the fact.that he failed to get a building permit for the construction of the elevator. 3. The subject property was legally subdivided and developed in a manner consistent with applicable zoning laws. 4. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. 5. Encroachment into -the required setback is not compatible with setbacks established for properties -to the North, South, and East, and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those -properties. AYES: Cranmer, Evans,.Godfrey, Poe NOES: Smith ABSENT: None -10- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 11 USE PERMIT NO. 85-54 Applicant: Michael Ray Cue A request to permit an addition to a single family residence with a nonconforming side yard. Subject property is located at 516 Tenth Street (East side of Tenth Street approximately 175 feet North of Pecan Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff stated this particular house was built in the early 20's and it appears this portion existed on the house when it was built. This small nonconforming area is protruding out on the North side of the residence and is encroaching more than three feet (3'). Staff is recommending approval of the second story addition but with no bath or shower facility permitted in the Game Room above the garage. Another stipulation would be that no disposer or cooking facility be allowed in the wet bar area. Staff is further suggesting that a letter of agreement be signed and recorded by the applicant stating this will be maintained'as a single family dwelling. Daryl Smith left the meeting at this point - 3:20 P.M. - and Les Evans Acting Chairman, opened the Public Hearing. The applicant, Michael Ray Cue, was present and inquired as to why he could not have the bath or shower in the addition. Scott Hess explained that it becomes very similar to a Bedroom and, as such, could affect the parking requirements. The applicant stated his in-laws might possibly be coming to stay with them and the bath facility would be convenient. Ross Cranmer called attention to the fact a fire separation wall would have to be installed between the garage and the room above. There was no one else wishing to speak so Acting Chairman Evans closed the Public Hearing. Daryl Smith returned to the meeting at this time - 3:29 P.M. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, USF PERMIT NO. 85-54 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND,CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The addition to the single family residence with nonconforming yards will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; -11- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 12 b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. The addition conforms to all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated August 12, 1985, shall be the approved layout with the change in designation of the "Game Room" to "Bedroom". 2. The wet bar area shall not include a stove, range, or similar appliance usually found in a Kitchen, nor shall it contain a garbage disposer. 3. The addition shall be architecturally compatible with the existing building. 4. The interior walls inside the garage shall be removed and the two -car garage shall conform to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code prior to final approval of the building permit. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Building Code, Fire Department, and Public Works Department. 6. Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-331 shall be recorded prior to final approval of the building permit. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Smith -12= 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-331 Applicant: Michael Ray Cue A request to consolidate two (2) lots into one (1) and Final Parcel Map Waiver. Subject property is located at 516 Tenth Street (East side of Tenth Street approximately 180 feet South of Acacia Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff stated this is a request for lot consolidation of two (2) lots into one (1) by eliminating the lot line. There is a question as to whether this line was legal and the applicant has indicated he has evidence of a document prior to 1946. Staff would recommend approval of the Waiver of the Parcel Map. The applicant, Michael Ray Cue, was present and agreed to the conditions. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY CRANMER, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-331 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed consolidation complies with the requirements as to area, improvement and design, flood and water drainage control, appropriate and approved public roads, sewer and water facilities, environmental protection, and other requirements of Article 992 of the Subdivision Section of the Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on August 14, 1985, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk's office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property. 3. An alley dedication of 2'-51 shall be made in accord with Public Works Department requirements prior to Waiver approval. -13- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 14 4. Prior to recordation,of the parcel map, the applicant shall submit a Chain of Title Report or other acceptable proof that the adjacent lot (Lot 14 of Block 509) was divided prior to June,'1946._ Otherwise, an amended Tentative Parcel Map will be required to incorporate.that lot. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-344 Applicant: Hau-En.Ying A request to lot consolidation and waiver of final map requirements. Subject property is located at 8032 Warner Avenue (Southwest corner of.Warner Avenue and "A" Street). Scott Hess said Staff was recommending the lot consolidation but not the parcel map waiver since there are no improvements on the site. The applicant, Hau-En Ying, was present and agreed to the conditions as presented. UPON MOTION BY EVANS'AND SECOND BY SMITH, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-344 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed consolidation of two (2) parcels for purposes of commercial/office use in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use'at the time the.land use designation for community business district allowing commer-cial/office buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision ordinance. -14- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 15 CONDTT10NS Oil APPROVAL: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on August 22, 1985, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Warner Avenue, "A" Street, and the alley shall be dedicated to City standards. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 8. The flood control channel shall be fenced to Flood Control District standards and City standards at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 9. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. (Contact the Department of Public Works for additional information). 10. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services. AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES,: None ABSENT: None There was no further business to be presented to the Board for discussion. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY EVANS, THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1985, AT 10:00 A.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -15- 9/11/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 11, 1985 Page 16 AYES: Cranmer, Evans, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: None i i i Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh (3316d) 1 -16- 9/11/85 - ,BZA