Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-12-18MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1985 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Hess, Franklin MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 4, 1985, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY STRANGE, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 1985, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: Evans ABSTAIN: Cranmer, Godfrey NOTE: Michael Strange was present at this Meeting to vote on the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 11, 1985. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 85-78 (Cont. from 12/4/85) Applicant: Vincent Vander Burgh A request to permit an adjacent fifteen foot (151) wide vacant parcel for parking and landscaping purposes in conjunction with a twenty-eight (28) unit apartment complex. Subject property is located at 8231 Ellis Avenue (North side of Ellis Avenue approximately 260 feet East of Goodwin Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 2 Scott Hess reported this request had been continued from a previous meeting to give the applicant time to determine whether the project would be feasible with the conditions being imposed by the Board. Mr. Hess further explained that Staff had made some changes in the conditions and is recommending approval of the request. Tom Poe said the applicant had contacted the Fire Department and the items relative to fire hydrants and the turning radius had been resolved. The Public Hearing was opened by Daryl Smith and the applicant, Vincent Vander Burgh, was present. Mr. Vander Burgh said he had covered the items with Scott Hess and the intensified landscaping would not be required. Mr. Vander Burgh stated he would have no problem with the conditions as revised. There was no one else present to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, USE PERMIT NO. 85-78 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received and dated December 2, 1985, shall be the approved conceptual layout. 2. Final Parcel Map No. 85-330 shall be approved by City Council prior to commencing any improvements 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: -2- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 3 a. Landscape and -irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Landscaping shall be provided within the easterly planter. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 5. _Service roads, fire lanes, and turning area, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 6. On -site _ fire.hydrants'shall be provided in number and at locations specified'by the Fire Department. 7. The parking layout -shall comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ord'inance'Code. 8. A six inch (6") high concrete curb shall separate the parking area from the landscaped area along the East property line. 9. Within one (1) year -,`the applicant shall be required to file a Zone Change to change the=zoning on the -fifteen -foot (151) wide strip from R1 to R2-in'order to be consistent with the proposed use. 10. The existing block wall along the East property line shall be raised to six feet (61),in height measured from the highest adjacent grade; or, if engineering studies indicate raising the wall would not be feasible ,,,-a-new six foot (61) high solid wooden fence shall be -'installed. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES:. -None ABSENT: Evans CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-90 Applicant: Apex Builders, -Inc. A request to permit a reduction in the minimum width dimension from twenty-five feet (251) to fifteen feet (151) for a portion of the required open space area within _the back yard to facilitate a room addition. Subject property is located at 20362 Everglades Lane (East side of Everglades Lane approximately one hundred eighty feet (1801) North'of Vicksburg Drive). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. -3- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H..B. Board of zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 4 According to Staff, the subject property is zoned R-1 and located in a single family residential subdivision. The applicant wants to expand his Bathroom intoa"spa-type bath for medical reasons and also expand the Family Room with the addition of a wet bar. Staff has notified the adjacent property owners but has received no comments. Staff has also reviewed the project and is recommending, denial because there is no land -related hardship or'unusual circumstances to warrant the variance. Ross Cranmer asked if this request was for a"second addition to the residence and Mr. Hess replied in the affirmative. Glen Godfrey inquired as to whether there was an entitlement for the first addition and Staff said the records did not indicate an entitlement for the previous addition. The Public Hearing was opened by Chairman Smith -and Dalton James of Apex Builders was present, along with the owners of -the property, Sam and Grace Anzalone. At the request of Mr. James, Staff explained to the applicants the possibilities available for expansion to the East side -of the lot and/or a Second Floor addition. Mr. James -felt the original design would better meet the needs of the applicants than the design suggested by Staff and would be less noticeable to the neighbors;- however, he said he was certainly amenable to pursue these,possibilities. There was no one else present to speak for or against the -project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND'BY CRANMER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-90 WAS DENIED WITH.THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same'distr-ict. The parcel is rectangular in shape and 6,000 Square -Foot in -size which is similar to other parcels in the vicinity. _ 2.. Since the. subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. -4- 12/18/85 - BZA I. Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 5 3. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-90 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 4. The subject property was legally subdivided and developed in a manner consistent with applicable zoning laws. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans USE PERMIT NO. 85-68 Applicant: C & H Development Company/Terence S. Clingan A request to construct a 6,000 Square Foot commercial building. Subject property is located at 15471 Edwards;Street (Northwest corner of Edwards Street and McFadden Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff stated the site is currently vacant and is in the C-4 Highway Commercial Zone. 4,000 Square Feet of the building will be utilized for commercial use and 2,000 Square Feet for office space. The applicant will have a reciprocal driveway with property to the North and will be on a zero property line to the West. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. Tom Poe said the Fire Department would like to propose noncombustible construction without any openings because of the proximity to existing buildings and no rear access to the proposed building. The Public Hearing was opened and Terence S. Clingan was present to represent the applicants, C & H Development Company and himself. Mr. Clingan stated they had not anticipated denial of a curb cut on Edwards Street. He further stated the Board was requiring a reciprocal parking and driveway easement between the properties. The easement has been drafted but we do not know if the adjacent property owner will sign it since it will require expending money for landscaping and improvements on his property for our benefit. Mr. Clingan said, furthermore, even if the driveway easement was required, he did not understand the requirement for the parking easement. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. -5- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 6 There was a discussion relative to the installation of an Edison transformer and to the ownership of the parcel. Staff stated that, according to the applicant, the same person owned this property and the Tastee Freeze property. Glen Godfrey said our records did not so indicate but there might be private easements on these properties. It was determined by the Board members that the parking easement suggested by Staff would not be required and there was a further discussion concerning the location and screening of the trash receptacle. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY CRANMER, USE PERMIT NO. 85-68 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the commercial building will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. Parking is sufficient based on 4,000 Square Feet of retail space and 2,000 Square Feet of office space. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site -plan received and dated November 25, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. Revised elevations shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Indicate trash area screening b. Extend the roofing along the South building wall to five feet (5') of the West building wall in conformance with Building and Fire Department standards. -6- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 7 c. No electrical panels may be permitted on the South and East building walls. d. No wing walls within the ten foot (10') setback along McFadden Avenue. e. The canopy along the South building wall shall not project more than five feet (51). f. Special architectural treatment shall be provided on the rear building walls. Such treatment is subject to approval by the Department of Development Services. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. Landscaping shall comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 5. A planned sign program shall be approved for all signing within the commercial center pursuant to S. 9760.43 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. a. All wall signs shall comply with Article 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. b. All free-standing signs shall be low -profile, monument -type signs. 6. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 7. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (2"). 8. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. a. All unused driveways shall be replaced with a full width sidewalk, curb and gutter to Public Works standards. -7- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 8 9. If an Edison transformer is required, it shall be installed within the building pad area or in a location fully screened from public view to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services. 10. The Fast building walls shall meet Fire and Building Department requirements. 11. All compact parking spaces shall be designated as such by painting the word "COMPACT" on the surface of the stall. 12. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 13. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 14. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 15. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 16. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement(s) between the subject site and the adjacent northerly property. 18. No more than 4,000 Square Feet of gross building area may be used for commercial uses; the remaining 21000 Square Feet shall be used for general office uses only. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans USE PERMIT NO. 85-71 Applicant: Architectural Team Three A request to permit expansion to a building on property with nonconforming setbacks and landscaping. Subject property is located at 18835 Beach Boulevard (West side of Beach Boulevard approximately five hundred fifty feet (5501) North of Garfield Avenr--� -8- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 9 This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1 and Class 11, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff stated there is currently a new car lot on this property and a used car lot on the adjacent property to the North. The applicant is requesting permission to construct a display area in front of the show room and to convert an existing detail bay area to a service bay area. This will necessitate additional landscaping on the site. Staff is recommending approval of the project with conditions - one of which is painting the curb "red" for a distance of eighty feet (801) North of the Beach Boulevard driveway entrance because of traffic congestion. Daryl Smith interjected the thought that this condition would fall under the jurisdiction of CalTrans rather than the Board of Zoning Adjustments and that the City Traffic Department should pursue such action if deemed by the Board to be advisable. The Public Hearing was opened and John Califf was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Califf expressed concern about consolidation of the parcels. The Staff member and Glen Godfrey explained a parcel map would be required unless the applicant could show proof the lots were created prior to 1958. Mr. Califf also stated the applicant would strongly oppose "red marking" the curb or having Staff pursue permission from CalTrans to require it. Daryl Smith explained the necessity for eventually eliminating all parking on Beach Boulevard because of traffic congestion. There was no one else present to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY CRAMMER AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 85-71 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. -9- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 10 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated December 16, 1985, shall be revised depicting the modifications described herein: a. Indicate a trash area on the new car lot b. Dimension the Second Floor of the Parts Department c. Provide additional landscaping as required by Articles 943 and 979 unless Conditional Exception No. 85-91 is approved for a reduction in landscaping 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating the two (2) lots. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 5. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 6. Driveways shall be modified, if required by the Public Works Department, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 7. Customer parking areas shall be designated as such by painting the words "CUSTOMER PARKING" on the surface of each space. 8. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building. 9. All signs shall comply with Special Sign •Permits No. 85-9. -10- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 11 10. Chain link fencing used for screening of outdoor vehicle storage areas shall be provided with slats or similar view obscuring materials. 11. The Public Works Department is requested, subject to CalTrans approval, to red curb the West side of Beach Boulevard adjacent to the subject property for a distance of eighty feet (801) beginning just North of the southerly drive approach. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe Y NOES: None ABSENT: Evans USE PERMIT NO. 85-75 Applicant: Morris Group Architects A request to construct a five (5) unit apartment complex in an R3 Zone. Subject property is located at the Southwest corner of Sandra Lee Street and Warner Avenue. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 81-72. Staff said the applicant is proposing construction of a two-story apartment complex with five (5) units. Sandra Lee Street will be the front yard, Warner Avenue will be the side yard, and the interior portion will be considered the interior side yard. The property is vacant and is zoned R3. The applicant has sufficient parking with two (2) guest parking spaces in the carport area. A discussion followed concerning the height and type of the patio walls and the perimeter fence and/or block walls, landscaping, and parking. The'Public Hearing was opened and Randy Morris was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Morris stated they would like to maintain the view from the lower units and the six foot (61) high wall would obstruct it. Daryl Smith explained the tenants would be subject to a lot of traffic noise. There was a discussion about building a forty-two inch (42") high wall with wrought iron above it to the six foot (61) height. Harry L. Rubin, owner, spoke about the length of time the project had been held in abeyance and stated they would like to get it under construction as soon as possible. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. Tom Poe moved for approval of the request with conditions as' amended. Daryl Smith asked if the maker of the motion would accept the condition that there should be a six foot (61) block wall, which -11- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 12 would match the structure, installed along the southerly property line. The applicant asked if it could be a split -face wall and Daryl Smith agreed to that request. Tom Poe, maker of the motion, agreed to the amendments to his motion. UPON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 85-80 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with -the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. The Warner -Avenue side of the property is considered an exterior side yard, the Sandra Lee Street side the front yard, and the interior side an interior -side yard. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated December 10, 1985, and elevations received and dated December 16, 1985, shall be revised depicting the modifications described herein: a. The northerly garage shall be designed as a two -car carport for guest parking only. - b. The walls around the private patio areas along Warner Avenue shall be forty-two inches (42") up to six feet (61) in height, with block wall to match existing architectural treatment of the building, intermixed with wrought iron treatment, depending upon the existing elevation, and shall be subject to review and approval of the Design Review Board. 2. A six foot (61) split -face block wall measured from the highest adjacent grade, shall be provided along the southerly property line. -12- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes p`H. '�. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 13 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. Landscaping shall comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. a. Landscaping shall be provided along the Warner Avenue setback area and shall be subject to review and approval by the Development Services Director. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width. 7. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 8. Low -volume heads shall be used on all sp igots and water faucets. 9. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 10. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 11. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. -13- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, December Page 14 H. S. Board of Zoning Adjustments 18, 1985 12. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans USE PERMIT NO. 85-80 Applicant: Charles E. Fitzgerald A request to establish a 2,760 Square Foot restaurant with cocktails within an existing shopping center with joint use of parking. Subject property is located at 19171 Magnolia Street (West side of Magnolia Street approximately nine hundred twenty-three feet (9231) South of Garfield Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. According to Staff, the applicant is proposing a restaurant which will not have any adult entertainment, live entertainment, dancing, juke boxes, or games, and the noise level will be kept low. The restaurant hours will be 11:30 A.M. to Midnight. Staff has reviewed and analyzed the application and is -recommending approval with conditions. Daryl Smith opened the Public Hearing and the applicant, Charles E. Fitzgerald, was present. Mr. Fitzgerald said his plans were not final and there was a possibility he might have to move a grill or a Rest Room. He wanted to be sure this would be permissible if the project was approved by the Board at today's meeting. Scott Hess instructed him to show any such changes on the plans before they were submitted for final plan check. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY CRANMER AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 85-80 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: 1 -14- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 15 a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. Based on the various uses within the commercial center, their hours of operation (see letter from Mort Wein dated October 29, 1985), and the proposed use and hours of operation (11:30 A.M. to 12:00 Midnight), there appears to be sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed restaurant. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 25, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. There shall be no juke box, pool table or other games in the restaurant. 3. There shall be no live entertainment or dancing in the restaurant. 4. Employees shall be required to park in the southerly parking lot. 5. All signs are subject to a separate review and must comply Article 976. 6. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 7. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke this Use Permit if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans -15- F 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. P. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 16 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-60 Applicant: Bill Maxey Toyota A request to maintain existing banners, flags, and pennants for a period of sixty (60) days. Subject property is located at 18881 and �19202 Beach Boulevard. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 11, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff stated the Land Use Division is enforcing a Code requirement for obtaining permission to install banners, flags or pennants on buildings or property, and the applicant is requesting permission to allow his existing banners, flags and pennants to remain in place for a period of sixty (60) days. Staff has reviewed the request and is recommending approval retroactive to December 2, 1985. This would mean that all banners, pennants and flags would have to be removed by January 17, 1986. The applicant's representative, Bill Rasmussen, was present. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-60 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The existing banners, pennants and flags, as shown on photos dated December 2, 1985, shall be permitted for a period of forty-five (.45) days, retroactive to December 2, 1985. 2. All banners, pennants and flags shall be removed by January 17, 1986. 3. No banners, pennants or flags shall be installed on the subject property without prior Board of Zoning Adjustments approval. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-61 Applicant: Seacliff Estates A request to establish a model home complex with parking for a period of approximately four (4) years. Subject property is located on the West side of Coldstream Lane immediately North of Camelback Drive. -16- 12/18/85 - BZA : Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 17 This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff stated the applicant is seeking approval to -establish a model home complex for the sale of residences in this tract. Staff has reviewed the project and is recommending approval with the standard conditions imposed on model homes. Richard A. Harlow was present to represent the applicant and accepted the Conditions of Approval. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-61 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual site plan dated December 4, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. A landscape and irrigation plan for the model home complex (building and parking), complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval prior to final inspection. 3. A site plan and elevations delineating various directional signs shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Development Services and Public Works, and installed prior to final inspection. Project identification (Subdivision directional) sign shall comply with Article 976 (Sign Code) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. All roads (including fire access) shall be of hard surface, all weather construction meeting Public Works requirements and installed prior to combustible construction. 5. All water lines and fire hydrants shall be installed and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of permits for any temporary or permanent structures. 6. Security fencing, gates, locking devices, ingress and egress from streets and parking areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire, Police and Development Services Departments prior to issuance of building permits. The parking area shall comply with Article 979. 7. The office use shall be disontinued within thirty (30) days following sale of the last on -site unit. A surety bond of $1,000.00 shall be posted with the City for the sales office -17- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 18 and for each model home complex to guarantee compliance with all provisions of the Code and the Huntington Beach Building Code. Such model homes shall only serve the tract specified in subject Administrative Review application. 8. Sales office shall not be converted or expanded into a general business office. 9. Fire lanes, as determined and approved by the Fire Department, shall be posted and signed. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-437 Applicant: Hunsaker and Associates A request to consolidate three (3) lots into one (1) parcel. Subject property is located on the North side of Warner Avenue between Sims Street and Lynn Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported the project had been reviewed and he was recommending approval of the consolidation with conditions. The applicant's representative, Steve Corman, was present and agreed to the Conditions of Approval. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY CRANMER, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-437 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed consolidation of three (3) parcels for purposes of residential use in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for residential district allowing residential buildings was placed on the subject property. -18- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 19 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed consolidation are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on November 21, 1985, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Warner Avenue, Sims Street and Lynn Street shall be dedicated and improved to City standards. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 8. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. (Contact the Department of Public Works for additional information). 9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services. 10. Vehicular access rights to Warner Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans -19- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. 5. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 20 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-440 (W) Applicant: 011ie S. Feemster' A request to consolidate two (2) lots into one (1) and Waiver of Final Map. Subject property is located at 316 Seventh Street (East side of Seventh Street approximately one hundred twenty-five feet (1251) South of Orange Avenue. This request is -covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported he was recommending approval of the map with waiver with the additional condition that proper alley dedication shall be made to Public Works standards. Ron Warrecker of Pearsall Engineering was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Warrecker agreed to the Conditions of Approval. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-440 (W) WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING -VOTE: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR WAIVER: 1. The proposed consolidation complies with the requirements as to area, improvement and design, flood and water drainage control, appropriate and approved public roads, sewer and water facilities,, -environmental protection, and other requirements of Article 992 of,the Subdivision Section of the Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Tentative Parcel -Map received by the Department of Development Services on December 4, 1985, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk's office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be -filed with the Department of Development Services prior to final inspection on the subject property. 3. Prior to Waiver of the Final Map, proper alley dedication shall be made to Public Works standards. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans -20- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. P. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 21 MISCELLANEOUS AGENDA ITEMS: SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-29 Applicant: William C. Goodman A request to permit an overhead door on the South building wall and deletion of one (1) parking space approved under Administrative Review No. 84-65. Subject property is located at 17042 Palmdale Street (Northeast corner of Palmdale Street and Cain Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported the Board had approved a 3,100 Square Foot industrial building for this location last year. The applicant will provide an overhead door in the building with access from Cain Avenue and would like to delete one (1) parking space. It will be necessary to provide thirty feet (301) of right-of-way on Cain Avenue per Public Works standards. There was a general discussion concerning an automatic opener for the roll -up door, the driveway approach on Cain Avenue, barricades being placed at the end of the street, and deletion of the parking space. Staff reported that Public Works was recommending denial of this project because Cain Avenue may be abandoned at sometime in the future. Daryl Smith asked that the Minutes of this meeting reflect that the concerns of Public Works Engineering Department were taken into consideration before Board action on the project. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POE, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-29 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and elevations received and dated December 18, 1985, shall be the approved layout. 2. A trash area shall be depicted on the site plan. 3. Six (6) parking spaces are required based on the following: 360 SF Office 1.2 spaces 1,790 SF Manufacturing 3.6 spaces 1,000 SF Warehouse 1.0 spaces 3,150 SF 5.8 (6.0 rounded up) -21- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 22 4. A11 previous conditions of Administrative Review No. 84-65 shall continue in effect where applicable. 5. Loading, unloading or parking shall be prohibited on the driveway in front of the overhead door off Cain Avenue, and shall be marked and posted "NO PARKING". Any loading or unloading (in the southerly overhead door area) shall be done fully within the building. 6. The end of Cain Avenue shall be barricaded to Public Works standards. 7. A loading area shall be depicted on the plan of twelve feet by twenty feet (12' x 201). 8. The roll -up door shall have an electric opener. 9. Driveway approach on Cain Avenue shall be to Public Works standards. 10. The northerly thirty feet (30') of Cain Avenue shall be improved to Public Works standards. AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans Nominations had been presented to the Board members at the Regular Meeting of December 11, 1985, for new officers to take effect at the first Regular Meeting in January, 1986. Those nominations were for the Fire Department representative (either Jim Vincent or Tom Poe) as Chairman and Ross Cranmer as Vice Chairman. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY SMITH, NOMINATIONS WERE CLOSED AND THE FOLLOWING VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THIS SLATE OF OFFICERS: AYES: Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: Cranmer ABSENT: Evans There was no further business to be presented to the Board for their review. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 1986, AT 10:00 A.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: L -22- 12/18/85 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments December 18, 1985 Page 23 AYES: Cranmer, Godfrey, Smith, Poe NOES: None ABSENT: Evans Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh (3957d) 1 -23 12/18/85 - BZA