Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-24MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, March 24,,1986 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office Chairman Mandic called the regular meeting of, the Redevelopment Agency to order. ROLL CALL Present: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green Thomas (arrived 7:42'P.M.) .Absent: None JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Chairman Mandic announced that a joint meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency had been called. ROLL CALL Present: Kelly,.MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green Thomas (arrived 7:42 P..M.) Absent: None PUBLIC'HEARING - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 129 - DEFERRED TO LATER IN THE MEET- ING MAIN -PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA The Chairman/Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing continued, open from March 17, 1986 on Resolution of Necessity which delineates parcels- in the Main -Pier Redevelopment Subarea which may poten- tially require public acquisition. The City Attorney/legal advisor to the Agency introduced documents into evi- dence into the record as follows: 1. Redevelopment Plan for the Main -Pier Redevelopment Project and Ordinance No. 2.634 adopting the plan. 2. Proposed Resolution of Public Interest and Necessity with attached maps And descriptions. 3. .Letter to. Huntington Beach Company dated February 279 1986, making offer to. purchase. Page 2 = Redevelopment Agency Minutes 3/24/86 4.­ Notide'of Emin I ent Domain Proceedings with attached Proof of Service.. 5. Letter from Lawler, Felix & Hall dated. March 13,.. 1986,, on behalf.of the "Huntington Beach Company. 6. Letter from.Green Burrito Restaurant dated March 5, 1986. 7. Pl anniin g and Negotiating 'Agreement with Huntington.'. PaCif ica Development -Group-dated August.'20, 1984, 8. Proposed Di ' sp9sition and Development Agreement with the Huntington Paci- fica Development Group. 9. Res.tated First Implementation Agreement dated February 21,,1986. 10. Declaration of Appraiser dated February 26, 1986. 11. Co.py -:--ofAssessor's -Rolls from Assessor -Parcel numbers 24"281-03, 24-281-04 and 24-281-12. 12. Copy ''.of -'deed 'to the City of Huntington Beach dated January 15, 1932-, set- tingforth the interest of the city. There being.no- one: present to on the matter and there 'b6ing no further protests. filed, either oral or writteri, the hearing was: closed by''the' Chair-* man/Mayor. Following 'discussion, by consensus of Agency con'Side-ration of Resolution of Necessity for Main -'Pier Redevelopment Project Area was deferred to later in the meeting.after a Closed Session of Council/Redevelopment Agency. -Y� MAIN -PIER PHASE I-- HUNTINGTON PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP'STATUS REPORT Doug LaBelle) Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment, presented a staff report. Discussion- was.- held regarding -retail- -space, decking and pier improvements. Discussion was held regarding the proposed Pier Side Village. developer/opera- tor Bryant L. 'Morris- Developi�ent Company; 'and Paragon Hotels Corporation as the developer/opprator of the Main -Tier Phase 'I hotel. Mr. LaBelle referred to two draft ,letters .dated' March,'25- ' 1980 recommending terms.'and 'conditions to .the acceptance of both-6f the proposed develo'Per/operators. Following discussion, a motion was made by_ MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to accept 'as Pier Side Village. Developer/ Operator Bryant . A . Morris Company with conditions as set forth in "d draft letter dated March 25, 1986 from the City Administrator to Mr.. Stanley Bloom, Randall Foods, as follows: 1. That formal entitlement plans be prepared and submitted -for this portion of the, project, pursuant to the First Implementation Agreement, by the May. 1, deadline. That includes the total development concept for Pier Side Village Phase I & II. 2. No later than Monday, ay, March 31,. you must provide to us a copy of an Agreement that you have entered into with Bryant L. Morris Development I Page 3 - Redevelopment Agency Minutes - 3/24/86 for the "Pier Side Village" project. The project must also be constructed in accordance with the scope and quality and as an integral part of the total development as provided for in the Disposition and Development Agreement, pre- viously entered into. with the caveat that there is a tie together between the developmental dates of both the pier side village, and hotel portions of the project and that the project be completed in a time frame which is of economic benefit to the City/ Agency. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to accept Paragon Hotels Corporation as the developer/operator of the Main -Pier Phase 1 hotel, subject to the following terms and conditions as outlined in the letter from the City Administrator to Mr. Stanley Bloom, Randall Foods, as follows: 1. That formal entitlement plans be prepared and submitted for this portion of the project, pursuant to the First Implementation Agreement, by the May 1 deadline. 2. The hotel must be of the scope and quality of that intended within the original Disposition and Development Agreement (Irvine Marriott quality). 3. The hotel franchise is subject to the approval of the City/Agency. 4. The hotel must provide for restaurant(s) and public meeting areas with banquet facilities the scope of which are subject to the approval of the City/Agency. 5. No later than Monday, March 31, you must provide to us a letter from the Huntington Pacifica Development Group indicating that Paragon Hotels is both the operator and developer you have selected to develop and operate this portion of the project. with the caveat that there is a tie together between the developmental dates of both the pier side village and hotel portions of the project and that the project be completed in a time frame which is of economic benefit to the City/ Agency. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandic, Green, Thomas NOES: Finley, Bailey ABSENT: None NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT - APPROVED - MAIN -PIER PHASE II PROJECT - MAIN -PACIFIC PROPERTY OWNERS The Deputy Clerk/Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment transmitting a Negotiation Agreement between the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and Main Pacific Property Owners rela- tive to the six -acre site bounded by Main, 6th, Walnut and Pacific Coast High- way. Page 4 - Redevelopment Agency Minutes - 3/24/86 Doug LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment, presented a staff report. i i Discussion was held regarding property owners in the area who were not willing to participate in the project. i, A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to approve and, following execution by all parties, authorize the Chairman and Clerk to execute a Nego- tiation Agreement between the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and Main Pacific Property Owners relative to the six -acre site bounded by Main, 6th, Walnut and Pacific Coast Highway. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO 5652 - ADOPTED - -CONCEPTUAL BOUNDARY OF THE BOLSA CHICA LINEAR PARK - DECISION TO WORK WITH COUNTY TO KEEP ESHAS OUT OF THE LINEAR PARK The Deputy Clerk/Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from the Develop- ment Services Director regarding the proposed conceptual boundary of the Bolsa Chica Linear Park. The Director of Development Services presented a staff report and informed Council that they had been provided with copies of Resolution No. 5652 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING PRO- POSED MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION NO. 1353 WHICH ESTABLISHES CRITERIA FOR A CONCEPTUAL BOUNDARY OF THE BOLSA CHICA LINEAR PARK." A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Green, to adopt Resolution No. 5652 as the conceptual boundary of the Bolsa Chica Linear Park. Following consid- erable discussion, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green NOES: Kelly, MacAllister NOT VOTING: Thomas ABSENT: None A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Mandic, to go on record that Council does not want the environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHAS) in the Bolsa Chica Linear Park and to direct staff to work with the County to achieve this goal. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green NOES: None NOT VOTING: Thomas ABSENT: None 1� LETTER RE: OFF -SHORE OIL DEVELOPMENT - APPROVED The Deputy Clerk/Deputy City Clerk presented a transmittal from the Develop- ment Services Director of a draft letter to the California Coastal Commission s 4 Page 5 -.Redevelopment Agency Minutes - 3/24/86 for the :Mayor's signature stating the City's concerns regarding_ offshore oil development. Director/Councilman MacAllister requested that the first sentence of the last paragraph of the letter be deleted. A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Kelly, to direct staff to transmit the letter to the Deputy Association Director of Offshore Leasing, Department of Interior; to the State Secretary of Environmental Affairs; and to the Cali fornia Coastal Commission. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES Kelly, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green NOES: MacAllister NOT VOTING: Thomas ABSENT: None Director/Councilman Thomas left the meeting at 8:55 P.M. AGENCY CLOSED SESSION 1-VG Chairman. Mandic called a Closed Session of the Agency pursuant to Government Code Section Section 54956.9(b)(1) there is a significant exposure to' litiga- tion).; Section 54956.9(c) Agency has decided to initiate or is deciding whe- ther to initiate litigation); and Section 54956.8 to give instructions to the Agencies negotiator regarding negotiations with various property owners con- cerning the purchase/sale/ exchange/lease of the property located Main -Pier Subarea of the.Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. RECESS - RECONVENE The Chairman called a recess of the Agency at 8:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:35 P.M. RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 129 - ADOPTED - MAIN -PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED EARLIER IN MEETING) . The Deputy Clerk presented Resolution of Necessity 129 for Council consider- ation = "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DECLARING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF SUCH PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN." On motion by Kelly, second Green, the Agency adopted Resolution of Necessity No. 129 by the .following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green NOES: MacAllister ABSENT; Thomas Page 6 Redevelopment Agency Minutes- 3/24/86 .AGENCY ADJOURNMENT The Chairman -adjourned the regular meeting.of the Redevelopment Agency.' Alicia M. Wentworth Clerk Y Deputy Clerk ATTEST: A 94 A Alicia-M. Wentworth .Clerk Chairman BY -Deputy Clirk er