HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-24MINUTES
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, March 24,,1986
A tape recording of this meeting is
on file in the City Clerk's Office
Chairman Mandic called the regular meeting of, the Redevelopment Agency to
order.
ROLL CALL
Present: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
Thomas (arrived 7:42'P.M.)
.Absent: None
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Chairman Mandic announced that a joint meeting of the City Council and the
Redevelopment Agency had been called.
ROLL CALL
Present: Kelly,.MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
Thomas (arrived 7:42 P..M.)
Absent: None
PUBLIC'HEARING - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 129 - DEFERRED TO LATER IN THE MEET-
ING MAIN -PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
The Chairman/Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public
hearing continued, open from March 17, 1986 on Resolution of Necessity which
delineates parcels- in the Main -Pier Redevelopment Subarea which may poten-
tially require public acquisition.
The City Attorney/legal advisor to the Agency introduced documents into evi-
dence into the record as follows:
1. Redevelopment Plan for the Main -Pier Redevelopment Project and Ordinance
No. 2.634 adopting the plan.
2. Proposed Resolution of Public Interest and Necessity with attached maps
And descriptions.
3. .Letter to. Huntington Beach Company dated February 279 1986, making offer
to. purchase.
Page 2 = Redevelopment Agency Minutes 3/24/86
4. Notide'of Emin I ent Domain Proceedings with attached Proof of Service..
5. Letter from Lawler, Felix & Hall dated. March 13,.. 1986,, on behalf.of the
"Huntington Beach Company.
6. Letter from.Green Burrito Restaurant dated March 5, 1986.
7. Pl anniin g and Negotiating 'Agreement with Huntington.'. PaCif ica Development
-Group-dated August.'20, 1984,
8. Proposed Di ' sp9sition and Development Agreement with the Huntington Paci-
fica Development Group.
9. Res.tated First Implementation Agreement dated February 21,,1986.
10. Declaration of Appraiser dated February 26, 1986.
11. Co.py -:--ofAssessor's -Rolls from Assessor -Parcel numbers 24"281-03,
24-281-04 and 24-281-12.
12. Copy ''.of -'deed 'to the City of Huntington Beach dated January 15, 1932-, set-
tingforth the interest of the city.
There being.no- one: present to on the matter and there 'b6ing no further
protests. filed, either oral or writteri, the hearing was: closed by''the' Chair-*
man/Mayor.
Following 'discussion, by consensus of Agency con'Side-ration of Resolution of
Necessity for Main -'Pier Redevelopment Project Area was deferred to later in
the meeting.after a Closed Session of Council/Redevelopment Agency.
-Y�
MAIN -PIER PHASE I-- HUNTINGTON PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP'STATUS REPORT
Doug LaBelle) Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment, presented a staff
report.
Discussion- was.- held regarding -retail- -space, decking and pier improvements.
Discussion was held regarding the proposed Pier Side Village. developer/opera-
tor Bryant L. 'Morris- Developi�ent Company; 'and Paragon Hotels Corporation as
the developer/opprator of the Main -Tier Phase 'I hotel. Mr. LaBelle referred
to two draft ,letters .dated' March,'25- ' 1980 recommending terms.'and 'conditions to
.the acceptance of both-6f the proposed develo'Per/operators.
Following discussion, a motion was made by_ MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to
accept 'as Pier Side Village. Developer/ Operator Bryant . A . Morris Company with
conditions as set forth in "d draft letter dated March 25, 1986 from the City
Administrator to Mr.. Stanley Bloom, Randall Foods, as follows:
1. That formal entitlement plans be prepared and submitted -for this portion
of the, project, pursuant to the First Implementation Agreement, by the
May. 1, deadline. That includes the total development concept for Pier
Side Village Phase I & II.
2. No later than Monday,
ay, March 31,. you must provide to us a copy of an
Agreement that you have entered into with Bryant L. Morris Development
I
Page 3 - Redevelopment Agency Minutes - 3/24/86
for the "Pier Side Village" project. The project must also be constructed in
accordance with the scope and quality and as an integral part of the total
development as provided for in the Disposition and Development Agreement, pre-
viously entered into.
with the caveat that there is a tie together between the developmental dates
of both the pier side village, and hotel portions of the project and that the
project be completed in a time frame which is of economic benefit to the City/
Agency. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to accept Paragon Hotels
Corporation as the developer/operator of the Main -Pier Phase 1 hotel, subject
to the following terms and conditions as outlined in the letter from the City
Administrator to Mr. Stanley Bloom, Randall Foods, as follows:
1. That formal entitlement plans be prepared and submitted for this portion
of the project, pursuant to the First Implementation Agreement, by the
May 1 deadline.
2. The hotel must be of the scope and quality of that intended within the
original Disposition and Development Agreement (Irvine Marriott quality).
3. The hotel franchise is subject to the approval of the City/Agency.
4. The hotel must provide for restaurant(s) and public meeting areas with
banquet facilities the scope of which are subject to the approval of the
City/Agency.
5. No later than Monday, March 31, you must provide to us a letter from the
Huntington Pacifica Development Group indicating that Paragon Hotels is
both the operator and developer you have selected to develop and operate
this portion of the project.
with the caveat that there is a tie together between the developmental dates
of both the pier side village and hotel portions of the project and that the
project be completed in a time frame which is of economic benefit to the City/
Agency. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: Finley, Bailey
ABSENT: None
NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT - APPROVED - MAIN -PIER PHASE II PROJECT - MAIN -PACIFIC
PROPERTY OWNERS
The Deputy Clerk/Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from Deputy City
Administrator/Redevelopment transmitting a Negotiation Agreement between the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and Main Pacific Property Owners rela-
tive to the six -acre site bounded by Main, 6th, Walnut and Pacific Coast High-
way.
Page 4 - Redevelopment Agency Minutes - 3/24/86
Doug LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment, presented a staff
report.
i
i
Discussion was held regarding property owners in the area who were not willing
to participate in the project. i,
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to approve and, following
execution by all parties, authorize the Chairman and Clerk to execute a Nego-
tiation Agreement between the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and Main
Pacific Property Owners relative to the six -acre site bounded by Main, 6th,
Walnut and Pacific Coast Highway. The motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION NO 5652 - ADOPTED - -CONCEPTUAL BOUNDARY OF THE BOLSA CHICA LINEAR
PARK - DECISION TO WORK WITH COUNTY TO KEEP ESHAS OUT OF THE LINEAR PARK
The Deputy Clerk/Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from the Develop-
ment Services Director regarding the proposed conceptual boundary of the Bolsa
Chica Linear Park.
The Director of Development Services presented a staff report and informed
Council that they had been provided with copies of Resolution No. 5652 - "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING PRO-
POSED MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION NO. 1353
WHICH ESTABLISHES CRITERIA FOR A CONCEPTUAL BOUNDARY OF THE BOLSA CHICA LINEAR
PARK."
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Green, to adopt Resolution No. 5652
as the conceptual boundary of the Bolsa Chica Linear Park. Following consid-
erable discussion, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: Kelly, MacAllister
NOT VOTING: Thomas
ABSENT: None
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Mandic, to go on record that Council
does not want the environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHAS) in the Bolsa
Chica Linear Park and to direct staff to work with the County to achieve this
goal. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: None
NOT VOTING: Thomas
ABSENT: None
1�
LETTER RE: OFF -SHORE OIL DEVELOPMENT - APPROVED
The Deputy Clerk/Deputy City Clerk presented a transmittal from the Develop-
ment Services Director of a draft letter to the California Coastal Commission
s 4
Page 5 -.Redevelopment Agency Minutes - 3/24/86
for the :Mayor's signature stating the City's concerns regarding_ offshore oil
development.
Director/Councilman MacAllister requested that the first sentence of the last
paragraph of the letter be deleted.
A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Kelly, to direct staff to transmit
the letter to the Deputy Association Director of Offshore Leasing, Department
of Interior; to the State Secretary of Environmental Affairs; and to the Cali
fornia Coastal Commission. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES Kelly, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: MacAllister
NOT VOTING: Thomas
ABSENT: None
Director/Councilman Thomas left the meeting at 8:55 P.M.
AGENCY CLOSED SESSION 1-VG
Chairman. Mandic called a Closed Session of the Agency pursuant to Government
Code Section Section 54956.9(b)(1) there is a significant exposure to' litiga-
tion).; Section 54956.9(c) Agency has decided to initiate or is deciding whe-
ther to initiate litigation); and Section 54956.8 to give instructions to the
Agencies negotiator regarding negotiations with various property owners con-
cerning the purchase/sale/ exchange/lease of the property located Main -Pier
Subarea of the.Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area.
RECESS - RECONVENE
The Chairman called a recess of the Agency at 8:55 P.M. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:35 P.M.
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 129 - ADOPTED - MAIN -PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
(PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED EARLIER IN MEETING) .
The Deputy Clerk presented Resolution of Necessity 129 for Council consider-
ation = "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH DECLARING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE ACQUISITION OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF SUCH PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN."
On motion by Kelly, second Green, the Agency adopted Resolution of Necessity
No. 129 by the .following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: MacAllister
ABSENT; Thomas
Page 6 Redevelopment Agency Minutes- 3/24/86
.AGENCY ADJOURNMENT
The Chairman -adjourned the regular meeting.of the Redevelopment Agency.'
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk
Y
Deputy Clerk
ATTEST:
A 94 A Alicia-M. Wentworth
.Clerk Chairman
BY
-Deputy Clirk
er