Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-05-07MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, MAY 71 1986 - 1.30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Franklin MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY EVANS, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 23, 1986, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 86-17 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-18 (Cont. from 4/30/86) Applicant: William H. Wilson A request to permit the construction of an eleven (11) unit apartment project. Subject property is located on the East side of Warner Avenue at intersection of Orion Street. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86-18. Staff member, Robert Franklin, reported the request had been continued from the previous meeting to give the applicant an opportunity to work with surrounding property owners in an effort to solve possible parking problems, density problems, etc. The request is for an eleven (11) unit apartment project to consist of two (2) fourplexes and one (1) triplex, and Staff also has some concerns over rooms shown as dens. Staff needs assurance from the property owner the rooms will remain as dens - not become bedrooms. Staff is further conditioning that Lots 2 and 3 shall enter into an irrevocable driveway easement. There have been suggestions from adjacent property owners on Marina View Drive that this property be rezoned but, as discussed at the previous meeting, this Board does not have authority to rezone these parcels. Staff is recommending approval of the project with conditions. Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 2 Daryl Smith inquired whether the new building height limitation would affect this project and Glen Godfrey explained the proposal• before City Council insofar as measuring from grade levels, etc. There was also a discussion between Dennis Krejci and Tom Poe relative to a shake roof in comparison to a composition roof. The Public Hearing had remained open from the previous meeting. The applicant, William H. Wilson, was present and stated he had met with some of the property owners after the previous meeting. He said -Kathleen Johnson had been designated as the leader and she was also speaking specifically for the Clarks. Mr. Wilson further stated he had agreed to the speed bumps and was amenable to a stop sign being placed if it was approved by the City. Don•Hartfelder, Architect on the project, explained they had reduced the height from thirty-two feet (321) to thirty feet (301) and had made other concessions to City requirements, as well as to the property owners. Mr. Hartfelder stated he felt it was an excellent project and would be an asset to the community, especially in comparison to some other projects in the surrounding area. Daryl Smith expressed concern over the type of wall which would enclose portions of the project and an extensive discussion -ensued concerning the wall and roof shape and type. Floyd G. Belsito, Attorney, -spoke in opposition to the project and also reiterated the zoning issue. He further stated this -particular property had originally been zoned R1 when first incorporated by the City. Bob Conway, 17172 Marina View Drive, objected to having apartments so close to his custom home and felt there would be a traffic problem because of the proximity to the long curve on Warner Avenue. Another resident, John De Leonardi, 17102 Sandra Lee Lane, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. De Leonardi stated he owned and had lived in his triplex since 1975. He further stated Mr. Wilson was fulfilling all requirements for the project and Mr. De Leonardi felt the project would enhance the neighborhood. Donna Clark stated she lived near the corner of Sandra Lee Lane and Orion Street and felt traffic generated by the project would definitely create a problem and parking spaces would be even harder to find than at present. There was no one else present indicating a -desire to speak either for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. -2- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 3 UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 86-17 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-18 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed eleven (11) unit apartment project will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated May 6, 1986, shall be the approved layout with the following modification: a. Revised elevations shall be submitted depicting a hip type roof on all garages. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Departments of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. -3- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 _ Page 4 Said landscape plan shall indicate the exact type and material of block wall to be installed and shall be subject to approval of the Landscape Division of the Public Works Department and Department of Development Services. 5. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed within twelve (12) months. 6. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 9. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 10. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 11. Lot Nos. 2 and 3 shall enter into an irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement. 12. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 13. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the room identified as a den on the Second and Third Floors shall remain as a den and not a bedroom unit. 14. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None -4- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 1, 1986 Page 5 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-6 USE PERMIT NO. 86-26 Applicant: Jesse Raymond A request to permit a two (2) story, 2,631 Square foot addition to an existing single family dwelling which currently has a nonconforming front yard setback. Subject property is located at 4062 Figaro Circle (South side of Figaro Circle approximately one hundred twenty-five feet (1251) West of Edgewater Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported the request is for an addition to an existing home in the Huntington Harbour area and is zoned R1-CZ which requires a Coastal Development Permit. The existing residence is 2,532 Square Feet. The applicant is proposing removal of a portion of the Second Floor but will rebuild it. One of the adjacent property owners is objecEing to the project and, according to the CC&R's, the applicant needs approval from the Architectural Review Committee of his Homeowners Association. The project was over on lot coverage but the applicant has reduced the size of the structure so it now conforms. Staff explained the building had been constructed with a legal ten foot (10') setback; however, with changes in the Ordinance Code, it would now require a fifteen foot (15') setback - thus creating the nonconforming situation. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. The Public Hearing was opened by Chairman Tom Poe and Jesse Raymond, the applicant, was present. Mr. Raymond stated the current plans meet the lot coverage requirements. Les Evans suggested that, since the applicant was making such extensive alterations to the residence, the house should be altered to get rid of the nonconforming use. Mr. Raymond stated the owner could go to fifty-five percent (55%) lot coverage so there was no legal requirement which would force them to make it into a conforming use. He further stated the owner was not remodeling the front portion of the residence. G1en,Godfrey was concerned about the bonus room which contained a wet bar, in addition to a number of bedrooms, and stipulated the residence would have to remain as a single family home. Mr: Godfrey further suggested the owner should sign a letter stating it_would remain a single family residence. Mr. Raymond stated the wet bar area would only contain a single sink with no hot water outlet. The owner, Carleton Genebach, reiterated the information on the original setback requirements and that he was just rebuilding the Second Floor of the existing residence. Daryl Smith questioned -5- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 6 Mr. Genebach regarding the CC&R's. Mr. Genebach stated he had delivered a set of plans on April 18, 1986, to John Lombardo of the Homeowners Association who was to contact Allen Edmonton. According to Mr. Genebach, if the Architectural Review Committee did not disapprove the plans within thirty (30) days, they would automatically become approved. A representative of Bonnie Cicol'etti, Ron Montgomery, was present and reiterated the objections expressed in her written communication to the City relative to blocking her views and to the proposed residence addition having a lack of compatibility with other properties in the area. Walt Howell identified himself as Bonnie Cicoletti's husband and stated they would like to have a continuance to see if these problems could be resolved before further disputes arose. The owner, Mr. Genebach, stated he did not want a continuance - that the adjacent property owners had been properly,notified of this hearing. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. SMITH MOVED, SECONDED BY KREJCI, FOR APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-6 AND USE PERMIT NO. 86-26. MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Krejci, Smith NOES: Evans, Godfrey, Poe ABSENT: None UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-6 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed single family residence addition conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal .Element of the General Plan. 2. The Coastal Development Permit is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the R1 Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed single family residence addition can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. -6- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 7 4. The proposed single family residence addition conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. An eight foot (81) wide public walkway easement exists abutting the rear of the property that was dedicated at the time of Tract Map approval of the entire subdivision. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 11, 1986, shall be the approved layout. 2. No new walls over forty-two inches (4211) high shall be permitted within the fifteen foot (15') front yard setback. 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 4. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 5. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 7. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 8. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke this Coastal Development Permit if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. 10. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Poe NOES: Krejci, Smith ABSENT: None UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, USE PERMIT NO. 86-26 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -7- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 8 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The expansion, maintenance and increased operation of the existing ten foot (10') front yard setback will be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal'is not consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 4. The project would entail'a 'massive renovation of the existing residence but the applicant has indicated he would not alter the construction to conform with the current fifteen foot (151) setback standards. Since this would entail but a minor modification, it could be accommodated during the construction phase. AYES: Evans, Godfrey,'Poe NOES: Krejci, Smith ABSENT: None COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-13 Applicant: Northwood Construction A request to add four hundred twenty-three (423) Square Foot First Floor room addition to a single family residence within the Coastal Zone. Subject property is located at 16382 Maruffa Circle -(East side of Maruffa Circle approximately one hundred ten feet (1101) North of Mistral Drive). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported this request is for an addition to an existing single family home which meets the intent of the Code, and it requires a Coastal Development Permit because it is zoned R1-CZ. Staff recommends approval with conditions. The owner of the property, Jim Krause, was present and, upon questioning, stated the residence was a two-story unit. He further stated it was just a small addition and there would be no structural changes. Mr. Krause said he had no problem with the conditions as presented by Staff. -8- 5/7/86 = BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 9 UPON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND BY KREJCI, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-13 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed single family residence conforms with the plans, Policies,, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 2. The Coastal Development Permit is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the R1 Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed single family residence can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 4. The proposed single family residence conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. An eight foot (8') wide public walkway easement exists abutting the rear of the property that was dedicated at the time of Tract Map approval of the entire subdivision. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plan, and elevations dated April 22, 2986, shall be the approved layout. 2. The proposed addition shall match the existing development in terms of building materials, colors and architecture. 3. The addition shall comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and Building Code. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 86-29 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-23 Applicant: Douglas W. Padelford A request to establish a new car dealership. Subject property is located at 19131 Beach Boulevard (West side of Beach Boulevard approximately three hundred twenty-five feet (3251) North of Clay Avenue). -9- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 10 This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86-23. According to Staff, the proposed new automobile dealership will be located on a vacant site in a C4 Zone. Redevelopment has reviewed the project and made their comments. It is felt an eight foot (81) high wall would be appropriate to protect the apartments from noise. The Environmental Board asked that any trees removed for construction be replaced by a tree of comparable size. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. There was a lengthy discussion between the Board members relative to reciprocal driveway easements on the site, no outside speakers or amplifiers, no openings or ingress to the service area on the West side of the building; fire protection equipment (standpipe system), aisleways between adjacent properties, and the height and type of block wall to be placed along the property line next to the apartment buildings. The Public Hearing was opened and the applicant, Douglas W. Padelford, was present. Mr. Padelford agreed to Staff's recommendations. Charles Palmer, owner of adjacent property to the South, was present and expressed concerns regarding access'to his property: Mr. Palmer asked that the Board require an opening in the property wall for joint access off Beach Boulevard. Another property owner, Lucille Harmon, stated she owned a fourplex just West of the subject property. She was concerned about the noise which would emanate from a car dealership; i.e., loud speakers, car repairs, revving motors, etc. Mrs. Harmon felt the noises would annoy her tenants and could cause rental problems for her. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. Daryl Smith asked that the dealership make every attempt to save the existing Eucalyptus trees. Glen Godfrey stated all loading and unloading of cars should be done completely on site - not on the street. Daryl Smith also stated he did not feel the project needed to be reviewed by the Design Review Board even though Redevelopment had made the suggestion in their comments. Dennis Krejci asked the applicant if he had any concerns over replacing the trees and the applicant stated there would be no problem. -10- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 11 UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, USE PERMIT NO. 86-29 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-23 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed car dealership will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 24, 1986 shall be the approved layout. 2. Outside speakers and amplified telephone bells shall be prohibited. 3. Truck loading and unloading of vehicles shall be done completely on -site, not on or from Beach Boulevard. 4. Vehicle services loading lines shall be completely on -site. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical. equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. Landscaping shall comply with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. -11- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 12 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 7. Applicant shall pursue CalTrans approval of radius type driveways on Beach Boulevard. 8. On -site fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department. 9. An automatic fire sprinkler system and standpipe shall be approved and.installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 10. All repair work shall-be,conducted wholly -within the building. 11. The applicant shall meet -all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 12. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed within twelve-(12) months.' 13. All signs shall -comply with Article 976 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All free-standing signs shall be low -profile, monument -type. 14. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters and central heating units. 15. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 16. All building spoils, such as unusable -lumber, wire,- pipe,'and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 17. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties especially to the abutting westerly residential properties. 18. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. 19. The subject property shall provide an irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement between the subject site and the adjacent properties to the south. -12- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 13 20. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke this Use Permit if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. 21. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 22. Where an existing tree is to be removed, the applicant shall provide a 24" tree on a one for one basis planted on the west end of the property. 23. The'Redevelopment Staff shall review exterior colors and materials. 24. An eight (8) foot block wall (decorative and compatible with existing adobe wall) shall be provided at rear property line along with dense plant materials adjacent to the up -ramp. Subject to review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 25. There shall be no openings or entrances to the service area on the west wall of the building. 26. A 42" high block wall shall be provided along the south property line between the proposed six (6) foot wall and the ultimate right-of-way. 27. Access to adjacent property to the south shall be maintained. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. 86-33 Applicant: South County Volkswagen/Isuzu A request to improve a fifty foot (501) wide lot for car sales, employee parking, and vehicle storage in conjunction with an existing car dealership. Subject property is located at 18771 Beach Boulevard (West side of Beach Boulevard approximately twelve hundred feet (112001) North of Garfield Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff informed the Board the applicant had requested withdrawal of the request because it had been determined by the Planning ' Department that the applicant did not own the property. Staff recommended the application be withdrawn. -13- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 14 Even though the applicant had requested a refund, the Board decided that no refund would be made because of the City's processing time involved. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY SMITH, USE PERMIT NO. 86-33 WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe,.Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-17 Applicant:• El Pollo Loco, Inc. A request for deletion of some conditions which were imposed by the Board on the original approval of project. Subject property is-' located on the East- side of Golden West Street approximately three hundred twenty feet (320') North of Warner Avenue. Staff reported a letter had been received from James A. Christensen, General Partner of Business Properties, requesting deletion of Condition Nos.-2-and 6 which read as follows: "No. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel -map to expand -the subject property. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection. No. 6. No free-standing signs shall be permitted because of the building's close proximity to Golden West Street." The letter -received -from Mr. Christensen is as follows-: "BUSINESS PROPERTIES Development Construction Management 17631 Fitch P.-0. Box 19586- Irvine, California 92713-9586 (714) 474-8000 April 16, 1986 THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Administrative Review No. 86-17 Gentlemen: We received today a'copy of your April 9,'1986, hearing pertaining to the El Pollo Loco drive-thru. We would like -to refer to the conditions by number. -14- 5/7/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 15 Item 2. The subject building is within -the existing Parcel and s t-Tice�the entire property is covered by the enclosed CC&R's, there Is no need to move the parcel lines. We are in the process of converting the transaction to a Lease Agreement and, at best, would consider a lot line adjustment. Unfortunately, with the new regulations on Parcel Maps, it would take nine to twelve months and the cooperation of eight (8) other owners to accomplish this. Therefore we ask that this condition be deleted. Item 6. We have two (2) monument signe (sic) allowed under Sign Program No. 83-2 at the locations shown on the enclosed site plan. We have already committed these signs to tenants and, therefore, cannot agree to Condition 6 unless it is modified to state that no "additional" free-standing signs will be allowed beyond those shown in Sign Program No. 83-2. Item 14. A copy is enclosed showing proof of a recorded CC&R. Very truly yours, HUNTINGTON BEACH ASSOCIATES /s/ James A. Christensen James A. Christensen General Partner JAC:lma Enclosure cc: Mr.. Joseph Walthour .....Mr. Jeff Jones" Staff member, Scott Hess, explained that further review had been made of the project and Planned Sign Program No. 83-2, and the parcel map would not be needed. Staff had also determined three (3) signs would be permitted. The applicant's representative, Charles G. Ball, was present. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-17 WAS AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 2. A tentative parcel map is not necessary since there are extensive CC&R's on the -subject property and surrounding parcels within the center that provide for common use of all vehicular access ways and parking spaces. -15- 5/7/86 BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments May 7, 1986 Page 16 6. No portion of the free-standing signs permitted by Planned Sign Program No. 83-2 located along Golden West Street shall be utilized for advertisin? the business within Building "K" because of the building s close proximity to Golden West Street. NOTE: All other Conditions of Approval in the City of Huntington Beach condition letter dated April 9, 1986, shall remain the -same. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None There was no further business to be presented to the Board for their review and consideration. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY POEy THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, MAY 12, 1986, AT 10:00 A.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh (5317d) -16- 5/7/86 - BZA 1