HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-06-25MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH'BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 1986 - 1:30 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Room B-6 - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
Evans, Godfrey., Krejci,_ Poe, Smith
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Franklin
MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, MINUTES OF
THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1986, WERE APPROVED AS
TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-37
Applicant: Robert L. Wood
A request to permit a wall forty-eight inches (48") high to six feet
(61) high within the front yard.setback. Subject property is
located at 423 Twentieth Street (West side of Twentieth Street
approximately fifty feet ( 50"- )' South of Pecan Avenue) .
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5,
California Environmental Quality Act, 1984.
Staff member, Robert Franklin, reported the request was for
placement of a wall over forty-two inches (42") high in the front
yard setback. There is an existing apartment project on the site
and the applicant wants to erect the fence to create an enclosure
for a patio area. Staff has evaluated the request and can find no
land -related hardship.. Therefore, Staff is recommending denial of
the project.
There was a discussion between Staff and the Board members relative
to the City Code requirements pertaining to fences. Staff explained
the variations in the height of the proposed wall and how the height
was measured from the interior grade level. Staff also explained
that parking spaces were provided at the rear of the lot.
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Pag e 2
The Public Hearing was opened by Chairman Tom Poe and the applicant,
Robert L. Wood, was present. Mr. Wood explained his conception of
the wall and presented photographs of walls in the adjacent
neighborhood which he felt were in violation of Code regulations.
Mrs./Wood also explained the unit was adjacent to a vacant lot and
their yard was constantly being inundated with beer bottles, trash,
etc., from passersby. She further stated they would like a private
area for entertaining friends and family.
There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the
project so the Public Hearing was closed.
Glen Godfrey and Daryl Smith stressed the importance of not
measuring the grade from a "raised" planter area, and Tom Poe
expressed concern about fire access to the rear apartment. Staff
also stated he had researched records and had not found permits for
fence or wall variations in the immediate vicinity. Staff felt any
of the existing fences would have been built illegally.
UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
NO. 86-37 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL:
1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique
topographic features of the subject property, there does not
appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises
involved that does not apply generally to property or class of
uses in the same district.
2. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 86-37 would constitute a
special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties
in the vicinity.
3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same
zone classifications.
4. Encroachment into the required setback is not compatible with
setbacks established for properties in the immediate vicinity
and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with
limitations upon those properties.
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
-2- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 3
USE PERMIT NO. 86-42
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-247
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-31
Applicant: Anthony Ursino/Ursino Development
UP REQUEST: To permit seven (7) unit apartment complex (six (6)
units and one (1) unit density bonus).
TPM REQUEST: To permit consolidation of three (3) parcels into one
parcel.
Subject property is located at 17230-17240 Elm Street (East side of
Elm Street approximately four hundred feet (4001) South of Cypress
Avenue).
This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86-31.
Staff explained the request was for a seven (7) unit apartment
complex which is in the redevelopment area. The applicant is
requesting permission for consolidation of three (3) lots into one
(1) for construction of the apartment project. He is also
requesting a density bonus for one (1) unit since density on the
parcels allows 6.3 units. Staff has evaluated the request and is
recommending approval with conditions.
A discussion ensued relative to depth of parking stalls, placement
of buildings, drainage easement, reciprocal parking arrangements,
and location of fire hydrants.
The Public Hearing was opened on all three (3) requests
simultaneously and Tony Ursino, the applicant, was present.
Mr. Ursino explained his request for the density bonus and placement
of the apartments on the parcels. There was no one else present
wishing to speak so the Public Hearing was closed.
UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NO. 86-31, USE PERMIT NO. 86-42, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-247
WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 86-42:
1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed
seven (7) unit apartment project will not be detrimental to:
a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity;
b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or
building.
-3- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 4
2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land
Use.
4. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 86-42:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated
June 24, 1986, shall be revised and resubmitted depicting the
modifications described herein:
a. Roof material shall be shadow shingle or medium shake.
b. Indicate "Cape Cod" type roof pitch of 6/12 slant.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a
parcel map consolidating Parcels 10, 11 and 12. Said map shall
be recorded prior to final inspection.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
submit the following plan:
a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department -of
Development Services and Public Works for review and
approval.
4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
5. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet
(271) in width and shall be of radius type construction.
6. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems
shall be completed prior to final inspection.
7. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking
facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. Gas,
water, and electricity shall be provided in patio areas.
8. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets.
9. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off -site facility equipped to handle them.
-4- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 5
10. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type
shall be installed as approved by the Building Division.
11. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke
this Use Permit if any violation of these conditions of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs.
12. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
draft a development agreement which addresses the following:
a. Mechanism for monitoring the affordable unit.
b. Set aside unit for families of moderate income.
Said agreement shall be approved by the
Director
of Development
Services and approved as to form by the
City Attorney
prior to
obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. A
copy of
the recorded
agreement shall be submitted to the Department
of
Development
Services.
14.
The applicant shall modify the existing
high fence
forty-two
inch (42")
located on the North property
line to
accommodate
the required dedication for the adjacent
parcel.
15. Fire hydrant shall be provided per Fire Department review and
approval.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-247:
1. The proposed consolidation of three (3) parcels into one (1)
for purposes of residential use is in compliance with the size
and shape of property necessary for that type of development.
2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land
use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of
this type .of use.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land
use at the time the land use designation for residential
district allowing residential buildings was placed on the
subject property.
4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and
improvement features of the proposed consolidation are proposed
to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and
-5- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 6
specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance
with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision
Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-247:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR
ANY PURPOSE:
1.
The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of
Development Services on June 25, 1986, shall be the approved
layout (with the amendments as noted thereon).
2.
A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department
of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder.
3.
Elm Street shall be dedicated to City standards.
4.
Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if
such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s).
5.
Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
the
sewage system at time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if
such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s).
6.
Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances.
7.
The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment
district at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. (Contact
the Department of Public Works for additional information).
8.
A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the
Department of Development Services.
9.
A drainage easement shall be provided by the applicant to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
AYES:
Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
None
USE PERMIT NO. 86-46
Applicant: Country Cottage Antiques
A request to permit a temporary outdoor event on July 18, 19, and
20, 1986. Subject property is located at 6885 Warner Avenue (North
side of Warner Avenue just West of Golden West Street).
-6- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
.Tune 25, 1986
Page 7
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 11,
California Environmental Quality Act, 1984.
Staff reported this was a request to use an existing parking lot to
display merchandise for sale. The applicant has received authority
from the property owners to conduct the parking lot sale in front of
their shop. They want to use four (4) designated parking spaces and
will have a tent. Staff recommends approval with conditions such as
maintaining the drive aisles per Police Department standards.
The applicant's representative, Teri Williamson, explained the tent
would be small and only used to keep shoppers out of the sun.
UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, USE PERMIT NO. 86-46 WAS
APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The conceptual site plan received .Tune 3, 1986, shall be
subject to approval of the Fire Department.
2. The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Public Liability
Claims Coordinator, Administrative Services Department, and/or
shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and Hold Harmless
Agreement to be executed at least five (5) days prior to the
event.
3. A Certificate to Operate, as required by 5.9730.80 of the
Ordinance Code, shall be issued prior to the event.
4. The applicant shall provide for clean up of the area after the
closing of the event.
5. The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits.
AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Godfrey
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-36
Applicant: Kevin C. Kelter
A request to permit the construction of an eleven thousand (11,000)
Square Foot industrial building. Subject property is located at
5326 Oceanus Drive (South side of Oceanus Drive approximately seven
hundred feet (7001) West of Graham Street).
-7- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 8
This request is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 73-16.
According to Staff, this request is for new construction of an
industrial building. Originally, the parking did not meet the new
Parking Code but this revised plan indicates correct parking
arrangements. Staff has reviewed the project and has concerns over
the location of the utility transformer. Staff feels it would be a
quality building with a lot of architectural movement and recommends
approval with conditions.
Tom Poe requested a condition requiring installation of a fire
sprinkler system because the building would be located beyond the
one hundred and fifty foot (1501) limit. Dennis Krejci reminded the
Board there might be a discrepancy between what was being called a
"mezzanine" by the applicant and what was covered in the Building
Code. There was also a discussion about the relationship of
warehouse space to office space.
The applicant, Kevin C. Kelter, was present and stated the utility
transformer was located in the front portion of the property
adjacent to his proposed building. He further stated he would like
to locate his transformer in front with proper landscaping used for
screening it from public view. Daryl Smith explained problems
involved with maintenance of the transformers and landscaping under
such circumstances. Dick Kelter, an associate of the applicant,
stated the Edison Company would tell them where the transformer had
to be located regardless of any decision of the Board. Glen Godfrey
refuted Mr. Kelter's statement and said there might be additional
costs involved, which the applicant would have to bear, if the Board
determined the transformer should be placed in another location.
UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 86-36 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated
June 18, 1986, shall be the approved layout.
2. The utility transformer box shall be designed and located in
the front setback and shall be screened from public view to the
satisfaction of Public Works and Development Services
Departments.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
submit the following plans:
-8- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 9
a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of
Development Services and Public Works for review and
approval.
b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall
indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and
shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen
said equipment.
4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
5. Maximum separation between building wall and property line
shall not exceed two inches (2").
6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet
(271) in width and shall be of radius type construction.
7. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations.
8. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts,
equipment or trailers.
9. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building.
10. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District.
11. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and
Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards.
12. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems
shall be completed within twelve (12) months.
13. All signs shall comply with Article 960 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code. All freestanding signage shall be low -profile,
monument -type.
14. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking
facilities, water heaters, and central heating units.
15. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets.
16. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off -site facility equipped to handle them.
17. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type
shall be installed as approved by the Building Division.
-9- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 10
18. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke
this Administrative Review if any violation of these conditions
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs.
19. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-39
Applicant: American Die Cast Engineering, Inc./dba RONAL WHEELS
A request to permit a twelve foot by sixteen foot (12' x 16') spray
booth to be located at an existing industrial building. Subject
property is located at 15692 Computer Lane (Northeast corner of
Computer Lane and Research Drive).
This request is.covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1,
California Environmental Quality Act, 1984.
Staff reported the application was for addition of a spray booth to
an existing industrial, building per Fire Department regulations.
The zoning is M1-A and the existing building is basically being
used for warehousing purposes. Staff is recommending approval of
the project with conditions - one of which would be restriping the
parking lot prior to issuance of building permits.
There was a discussion relative to outside storage and the necessity
for protective fencing but it was determined not to be needed.
The applicant's representative, John Maurer, was present and
explained there had been a misunderstanding in obtaining building
permits. They thought approval for the spray booth had been
received at that time but they were informed by the Fire Department
it had not.
UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 86-39 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated
June 3, 1986, shall be revised and resubmitted depicting the
modifications described herein:
-10- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 11
a. Existing eight foot (8') wide landscape berm shall be
increased to a ten foot (10') wide landscape berm (along
Research Drive entrance).
b. Provide landscape -buffer on the south face of the spray
booth.
2. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
3. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations for the
proposed spray booth.
4. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts,
equipment or trailers.
5. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building.
6. The applicant shall obtain=the necessary permits from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District.
7. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and
Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards.
8. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems
shall be completed within twelve (12) months.
9. Proposed structures shall be architecturally -compatible with
existing structures.
10. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off -site facility equipped to handle them.
11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
restripe the parking' lot so that it conforms to the provisions
of Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
12. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke
this Administrative Review if any violation of these conditions
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs.
13. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
-11- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 12
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-259
Applicant: Alex Patterson
A request to subdivide one (1) parcel into two (2) parcels. Subject
property is located at 7741-7751 Liberty Avenue (North side of
Liberty Avenue approximately one hundred feet (1001) East of
Jacquelyn Avenue).
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15,
California Environmental Quality Act, 1984.
Staff explained the request is for taking an existing parcel and
subdividing into two (2) parcels. The new parcels will meet the
Code and residential apartments will be located on the sites. Staff
has reviewed with Public Works and would recommend approval with
conditions.
Dennis Krejci called attention to the possible necessity for a
corner radius cutoff at the alley which was not shown on the map,
and Les Evans agreed it would be required. There was also a
discussion about requiring a reciprocal drainage easement between
the two properties, removal of the existing structures, and
recording changes on the final map.
The applicant's representative, Charles Kruzak, was present and
agreed to the conditions.
UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY POE, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 86-259 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL:
1. The proposed subdivision of one (1) parcel into two (2) parcels
for purposes of residential use is in compliance with the size
and shape of property necessary for that type of development.
2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land
use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of
this type of use.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land
use at the time the land use designation for residential
district allowing residential buildings was placed on the
subject property.-
4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and
improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed
to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and
-12- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 13
specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance
with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision
Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR
ANY PURPOSE:
1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of
Development Services on. June 3, 1986, shall be the approved
layout (with the amendments as noted thereon).
2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department
of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder.
3. Liberty Avenue shall be dedicated to City standards.
4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
water system.at the time said parcels) is/are developed (if
such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s).
5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's
sewage system at the time said.parcel(,$) is/are developed (if
such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s).
6. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances.
7. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment
district at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. (Contact
the Department of Public Works for additional information).
8. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the'
Department of Development Services.
9. Provide reciprocal drainage easement and reciprocal driveway
easement, and each easement shall be identified on final map.
10. Remove existing building at rear which crosses the property
line prior to recordation of parcel map. Remove other two (2)
buildings within sixty (60) days after recordation.
11. Final map shall indicate radius at corner of Liberty Avenue and
alley.
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
-13- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 14
MISCELLANEOUS AGENDA ITEMS:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-42
Applicant: Wilson Ford Sales
A request to permit temporary vehicle storage for a period of ninety
(90) days for two hundred fifty (250) vehicles. Subject property is
located on the West side of Gothard Street between Talbert Avenue
and Ellis Avenue (A.P. No. 111-071-35).
Staff stated the request is for temporary storage of vehicles on the
old "transfer station" property which is owned by the County. Staff
explained the lot is paved and there is an existing fence. Staff
recommended approval with conditions.
Glen Godfrey stated the applicant would need a licensing agreement
with the County.
Rock Armstrong, the applicant's representative, was present and
agreed to the conditions.
UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 86-42 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Vehicle storage on the old "Transfer Yard" shall be subject to
a licensing agreement with the County of Orange and shall not
exceed a period of ninety (90) days from the date of approval.
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Bob Franklin reported to the Board that there had been basically no
problems encountered at the recent Huntington Beach Concours
D'Elegance held at Charter Centre. He also stated he had spoken
with people attending the Holiday Health Spa and had received no
objections to the valet parking arrangement. Daryl Smith expressed
skepticism because this was the first scheduled year and next year
the event would probably be larger.
There was no further business to be presented to the Board for their
review.
UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY KREJCI, THE REGULAR MEETING WAS
ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, JUNE 30, 1986, AT
10:00 A.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
-14- 6/25/86 - BZA
Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
June 25, 1986
Page 15
AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
49�x
Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary
Board of Zoning Adjustments
jh
(5643d)
1
-15- 6/25/86 - BZA