Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-08-06MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1986 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Smith STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Franklin MINUTES: MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JULY 23, 1986, WF.E DEFERRED DUE TO LACK OF VOTING MEMBERS UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY KREJCI, MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JULY 30, 1986, WERE APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 85-29 (Cont. from 7/2/86) Applicant: Pacific Coast Corporation A request to permit an 113,000 Square Foot mini -storage facility. Subject property is located on the North side of Center Street just East of Gothard Street and adjacent to SPPR right-of-way. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 85-15. Staff.member, Robert Franklin, stated a letter had been received from the applicant requesting another two -week continuance based on ' the fact the development agreement is being formed and may soon be approved by the Redevelopment Agency. Staff recommended approval of the continuance. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, USE PERMIT NO. 85-29 WAS CONTINUED, AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, TO THE MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1986, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, --Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 2 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-51 Applicant: Gerald Sy Golub A request to permit a nine foot (91) driveway width in lieu of ten foot (101) width, and to permit a guest parking space to be located within the front yard setback area. Subject property is located at 8092 La Palma Avenue (South side of La Palma Avenue approximately eighty feet (801) East of Patterson Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported this request was very similar to a Conditional Exception approved by the Board in 1985. The applicant's plans were in plan check but time has expired on that request. There )re, the applicant is reapplying for approval of the Conditional Exception. Staff would recommend approval with the same basic conditions as previously imposed. Upon questioning by Dennis Krejci, Staff explained he had made several unsuccessful attempts to contact the applicant by telephone to apprise him of the conditions; and the applicant had just arrived at the meeting so he was not aware of the conditions until they were read at the meeting. Glen Godfrey asked if the applicant had been successful in obtaining a reciprocal driveway agreement with the adjoining neighbor and Staff replied that, to his knowledge, there had been no such agreement filed. The Public Hearing was opened by Vice Chairman Dennis Krejci and the applicant , Gerald Sy Golub, was present. The applicant explained their proposal to attach the garage to the existing residence at the roof with a small breezeway patio area between the two buildings. The two (2) unit addition at the rear would be attached to the existing dwelling and there would be intensified landscaping on the site. The applicant stressed the fact the entire area would be improved and upgraded by the addition of these structures. Jim Vincent expressed concern over the length of the driveway and the distance from an available fire hydrant. Mr. Vincent suggested the rear unit would be need fire sprinklers and the applicant replied that would be no problem. Glen Godfrey inquired about the fence which had existed and Dennis Krejci stated there was nothing to prevent the adjacent neighbor from rebuilding the fence on the property line along the driveway area. Mr. Godfrey stated the only feasible way of handling the situation was with the reciprocal driveway easement. -2- 8/6/86 - BZA 1 Minutes, August 6, Page 3 H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments 1986 There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. There were further discussions regarding the nine foot:.(9') width of the driveway, the need for a reduction of two feet (2') in the front yard setback area to accommodate an on -site guest parking space, and the need for sprinklering the new units on the rear of the site. VINCENT MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-51 WITH CONDITIONS AND FINDINGS AS AMENDED. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-51 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. 2. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 86-51 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. 4. Encroachment into the required setback is not compatible with setbacks established for properties to the East and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci NOES: Vincent ABSENT: Smith Glen Godfrey asked that the Minutes reflect his vote against the project was consistent with his original vote for Denial since he felt the only way the project could work was with a reciprocal driveway easement. -3- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 4 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-53 Applicant: Sandra J. Roe A request to permit the placement of a six foot (6') high fence at a three foot (31) front setback (Code requires twelve feet). Subject property is located at 604 Sixteenth Street (East side of Sixteenth Street approximately twenty-five feet (25') North of Acacia Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. According to Staff, the request is to recognize an existing wood fence at the three foot (3') front setback in lieu of twelve feet (12!) which is required by Code, and to allow the applicant to replace it with a six foot (61) high fence. Staff further sk ted he had researched the address and had found a building permit issued in 1977 for the fence. The current situation is in conflict with the present Zoning Code since the dwelling was built under the Town Lot requirements. Staff stated he could find no special circumstances for granting a Conditional Exception and recommended Denial. Glen Godfrey asked how this situation had been brought to light and Staff replied it was through checking of the area by Land Use The applicant had then requested the Conditional Exception. The Public Hearing was opened and the applicant, Sandra J. Roe, was present. Ms. Roe stated they needed the new six foot (61) high fence to allow a patio area for privacy and also that they had two (2) large dogs which could jump the J ower fence. Ms. Roe further explained that a dog in the area had recently jumped a fence and bitten a neighbor, and that the Postal Department had informed them they would not deliver mail. Mark Chernoff stated he lived across the street from Ms. Roe and he. was in favor of allowing the higher fence because of all the problems the neighborhood was experiencing with teenagers running across the yards, throwing debris and trash into the yards, punk rock problems, etc. Mr. Chernoff felt the higher fences would be a safety factor for better protection of their families and property. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the Public Hearing was closed. Dennis Krejci asked what Planning Staff's position would be concerning solid fencing interspiced with wrought iron. Glen Godfrey stated that type of fencing would not be architecturally compatible with the residence. -4- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 5 Les Evans stated he did not see how the Board could approve such a variance request since it would be setting a precedent and that the applicant had the right of appeal to the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Evans stated the Board should either deny it or request a Code change. Jim Vincent suggested referring the item to the Planning Commission. Mr. Evans said a referral would indicate the Board's approval of this type of variance and a Code change, and he did not feel that way. Mr. Vincent did not agree with Mr. Evans' interpretation. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-53 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to,be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. 2. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 86-53 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. 4. Encroachment into the required setback is not compatible with setbacks established for properties to the North, South, East, and West and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith USE PERMIT NO. 86-51 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-30 Applicant: Southrid a Investments A request to permit a triplex (which includes a one (1) unit density bonus) on two (2) adjacent lots. Subject property is located at 7822-7832 Alhambra Drive (South side of Alhambra Drive approximately seven hundred twenty-five feet (7251) West of Beach Boulevard). This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86-38. -5- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 6 Staff reported he had received a letter from the applicant requesting that the item be tabled until conclusion of City Council action on a zoning change for the area. If the zone change is approved, the applicant will still need a Use Permit but would be allowed to have a triplex on each lot. Staff is supporting the applicant's request with conditions... Dennis Krejci asked if the project would automatically be approved if not acted upon by September 13, 1986. Mr. Franklin felt the mandatory processing date would be waived and Glen Godfrey stated the tabling would not validate the mandatory processing time. Les Evans suggested that the Board might table the application at the applicant's request; and, if the application was not withdrawn or reactivated within the time limit, the Board's action wc,1d be Denial. Staff said the Use Permit and Negative Declaration should both come back to the Board for their action. The Public Hearing was opened and there was no one present to represent the applicant. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project and the Public Hearing was left open. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 86-51 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-38 WERE TABLED, AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith USE PERMIT NO. 86-52 Applicant: Ed Giardina/St. Bonaventure Church A request to permit an annual carnival on October 10, 11, and 12, 1986, at the St. Bonaventure Church. Subject property is located at 16400 Springdale Street (Northeast corner of Springdale Street and Heil Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 4, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. According to Staff, this request is the same as made last year for a three (3) day carnival at a Church site surrounded by residential buildings. Staff has checked with the Police and other departments, and memos have been received agreeing to approval of the request with the same conditions as imposed last year. -6- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 7 The Public Hearing'was'bpened and Ed Giardina was present to represent St. Bonaventure Church. Mr. Giardina stated the only question they had was on the hours of operation and requested they be allowed to open at 1:00 P.M. on Sunday rather than 2:00 P.M. Virginia Mason, 6071 Orlando Drive, was present and objected to the change in hours of operation as requested by Mr. Giardina. Ms. Mason stated the time should remain at 2:00 P.M. because of the parking and traffic problems created by people leaving Mass services and arriving at the carnival at the same time. She also expressed concerns relative to shift changes of the Police Department personnel. According to Ms. Mason, the arriving officers were not properly advised by the departing officers of procedures to be followed in directing traffic, streets to be barricaded, etc. Josephine Peck Calkin, 16342 Angler Lane, said the City Council had told the Church they could have the carnival for one year mealy, and wanted to know why the residents had to go through this herring every year. Bob Franklin explained this type of temporary event request did not even require a Public Hearing and the neighbors were notified only as a courtesy. Glen Godfrey explained the City Council had only suggested the affair might be getting too big for -the neighborhood and, if there were serious problems, another location might have to be found for the event. However, Mr. Godfrey said he did not believe it was the intent of the City Council to limit it to just one year. Another resident, Joan Armstrong, 16382 Bradbury Lane, expressed concern over problems created previously by construction on the Church site at the same time of the carnival. Mr. Giardina assured her there would be no construction going on and they had just resurfaced the parking lot. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. In compliance with Ms. Mason's request, Glen Godfrey suggested the starting hours on Sunday remain at 2:00 P.M. and Jim Vincent concurred. Also, Mr. Godfrey felt the Police officers should be directed by their Supervisors as to the proper procedures for uniformity in changing shifts. UPON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOND BY VINCENT, USE PERMIT NO. 86-52 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: The establishment, maintenance,•and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: -7- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 8 a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building 2. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Prior to the event, the following shall be complet is a. All necessary electrical permits shall be obtained. b. The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Public Liability•Claims Coordinator, Administrative Services Department, and/or shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement to be executed"at least five (5) days prior to the event. c. An on -site inspection by the Fire Department shall be required prior to the event. The applicant shall apply for a Fire Department permit at least seven (7) days prior to the event to allow for this inspection and to allow sufficient time for final documents to be issued. The applicant shall also submit, along with the application, a detailed site plan indicating fire lanes and booth, ride, and large equipment locations. The applicant shall meet with a Fire Department representative at time of issuance of permit to receive approval of the submitted site plan. The site shall be inspected for compliance prior to 10:00 A.M. on the opening day. d. Submittal of a written agreement form the Redeemer Lutheran Church across the street for the provision of one hundred fifty (150) spaces in addition to the three hundred eleven (311) parking spaces provided on the Church site itself. e. Prior to operation of any equipment used in conjunction with the amusement rides, the City shall be in receipt of State certification and permits, showing inspection within one (1) year period, stating that the rides meet all requirements of the State Industrial Safety Division. -8- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 9 f. The Church shall provide a name and telephone number of a contact person with whom the local residents may make contact about any complaints they may have on the festival activities between the dates of October 10 through October 12, 1986. g. The Church shall distribute a letter to the affected residents indicating the contact person's name and a map showing what streets will be barricaded. h. A Certificate to Operate shall be issued by the Director of Development Services. 2. The hours of operation of the festival shall be limitrx to the following: Noon to 9:30 P.M. on Friday, 10:00 A.M. t. 9:30 P.M. on Saturday, and 2:00 P.M. to 9:30 P.M. on Sunday. 3. All operations of the festival, including machinery other than necessary refrigeration units, shall desist between the hours of 9:30 P.M. and 8:00 A.M. 4. Use of amplifiers, speakers, musical instruments, and playing of recorded music are to be discontinued as of 9:00 P.M. each evening. 5. All activity on the site or clean-up activity off site shall be shut down by 11:00 P.M. All activities shall conform to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code regarding noise. 6. In number, as determined by the Police Chief, uniformed officers shall be provided on site during the operation hours of the event except that there shall be a minimum of ten (10) security officers and one (1) supervising officer on site from 6:00 P.M. to the close of the event on Friday, October 10, 1986, and from 2:00 P.M. to closing on Saturday and Sunday, October 11 and 12, 1986. The contract for the officers shall include an one-half hour period before and after the scheduled duty time for briefing and travel time. Where there may not be a sufficient number of Huntington Beach Police officers, the applicant shall hire private security guards. The applicant shall be required to meet with the Patrol Sergeant to ensure standard enforcement between shifts. 7. Two (2) people from the Church shall patrol the adjacent surrounding neighborhoods during the hours of the festival operation to control trespassing and littering from occurring; and additional Church personnel shall monitor Springdale Avenue to deter patrons from jaywalking to reach the carnival or parking lot. -9- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 10 8. The Board recommends that an announcement be made in the Church to ask the parishioners not to park on the neighborhood streets, and that workers at the event itself be encouraged to park in the Lutheran Church parking lot. 9. The following traffic, circulation, and on -site parking provisions shall be made during the event: a. Barricades shall be placed at the intersections of Springdale Street and Brassie Circle, Springdale Street and Orlando Drive, Heil Avenue and Bradbury Lane, Orlando Drive and Bradbury Lane, and Orlando Drive and Angler Lane. The applicant shall provide, at their expense, uniformed police officers to man the barricades at all times du ing the hours of operation at all locations except Or! ndo Drive and Angler Lane, one (1) hour prior to the opening of the festival to the close of each day (to be approved by the Traffic Engineer and Traffic Division of the Police Department). Barricades shall be delivered and available for placement one (1) day prior to the event. b. Appropriate signs (temporary) for the direction of traffic and on -site parking shall be provided by the applicant. Said signs, location, and content to be as recommended by the Traffic Division of the Police Department. c. The vehicular access off Orlando Drive and Bradbury Lane shall be secured and not used for ingress/egress to the site except for emergency purposes. d. All vehicular ingress and egress to the site shall be via the Church driveway located mid -block on Springdale Street. e. Vehicular parking shall be prohibited on the driveway leading to Orlando Drive so that emergency access will not be impeded. f. Some additional temporary fencing shall be erected along Bradbury Lane to close off any access from that street into the festival grounds. g. Any refrigeration truck to be placed on site shall be located as near as possible to the intersection of Springdale Street and Heil Avenue to minimize noise from the unit. h. The police shall place barricades at the left turn lane on Orlando Drive to prevent any turning into the Church property at this location. -10- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 11 10. All equipment and manpower required by Condition Nos. 6 and 9. a. shall be provided at the applicant's expense. 11. No structures, booths, etc., shall be erected on the site sooner than two (2) weeks prior to the event, and all evidence of the activity (booths, rides, and other material shall be completely removed from the site within two (2) weeks of closing of the festival. All rental equipment shall be removed from the site within one (1) week of closing of the festival. 12. The applicant shall provide professional clean-up crews to clear the adjacent streets of trash and debris each evening after closing of the activity. 13. All trash, debris, and garbage, as well as special dL.ipsters, shall be removed from the site within two (2) days of the closing of the festival. 14. Alcoholic beverage sales are subject to review and approval of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and issuance of a license. 15. In the event there are any violations of the foregoing conditions or any violations of live safety codes, the festival activity will be terminated and not permitted to reopen. AYES: Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: Evans ABSENT: Smith USE PERMIT NO. 86-57 Applicant: Bill F. Mathis A request to permit an outdoor sale in an existing parking area from August 9 to August 23, 1986. Subject property is located at 17881 Beach Boulevard (West side of Beach Boulevard approximately four hundred feet (4001) North of Talbert Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 11, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff explained this request was for an outdoor sale for fifteen (15) days and the request has been circulated to the Police and other departments. The display will utilize four (4) parking spaces but there is ample parking in the rear of the building. The Fire Department has concerns regarding location of the tents and the tents must be of non-flammable construction. Staff would recommend approval with conditions. -11- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 12 The Public Hearing was opened and Bill F. Mathis, the applicant, was present. Mr. Mathis explained he had conducted this same type of sale for several years at his location in another city without any problems. He further stated the tents would have openings on each side, would be placed in front of the store, the store would be closed for remodeling during the sale, and a security guard would protect the area at night. Jim Vincent stated he had very serious concerns over the number and placement of the tents and clearance for fire truck access. Mr. Vincent said he had been at the location and did not fc:al there was ample space for six (6) tents. He further requested a more detailed site plan and suggested limiting the tents to four (4) rather than six (6). Mr. Mathis said he had measured the location and there was room for the six (6) tents. Les Evans stat( he had not been to the location and would defer to Mr. Vincent and Mr. Krejci in this decision. Dennis Krejci broached the subject of remodeling the building and reminded the applicant he would need to obtain building permits. Mr. Mathis said he was trying to coordinate all facets of the procedure. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. The Board was reminded the appeal period, would not be over before the applicant started the outdoor sale and a discussion followed. The applicant agreed to cease all operations at the site in the event an appeal was filed. UPON MOTION BY KREJCI AND SECOND BY GODFREY, USE PERMIT NO. 86-57 WAS APPROVED WITH AMENDED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A detailed site plan shall be provided and shall be subject to approval of the Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, Administrative Services Department, and/or shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement to be executed at least five (5) days prior to the event. 3. A Certificate to Operate, as required by 5.9730.80 of the Ordinance Code, shall be issued prior to the event. 1 -12- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 13 4. The applicant shall provide for clean up of the area after the closing of the event. 5. The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits. 6. Tents shall be made of flame resistant material. 7. The applicant shall be restricted to placement of only four (4) tents - two (2) on the North side of the walkway and two (2) on the South side of the walkway. 8. The walkway from front entrance to the sidewalk shall remain free and clear to the sky. 9. The applicant shall close down the operation and r nove all tents and merchandise from the site in the event any interested person shall appeal during the ten (10) day appeal period. 10. A revised site plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-288 Applicant: Erich Ziebarth A request to consolidate two (2) parcels into one (1) parcel. Subject property is located at 1008 Huntington Street (East side of Huntington Street approximately fifty-five feet (551) North of Joliet Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff explained the request is for consolidation of two (2) parcels into one (1) parcel so the applicant can add onto an existing structure. Staff has reviewed the map with Public Works and the alley dedication is on record. The existing garage at the rear of the property will be removed and Staff is recommending approval of a waiver. The applicant's representative, Carol Herd Southern, was present and accepted the conditions as read. Les Evans concurred with the findings and conditions for a waiver. -13- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 14 UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-288 (W) WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,.BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR WAIVER: 1. The proposed consolidation complies with the requirements as to area, improvement and design, flood and water drainage control, appropriate and approved public roads, sewer and water facilities, environmental protection, and other requirements of Article 992 of the Subdivision Section of the Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID :'.RCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on July 3, 1986, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk's office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-301 Applicant: Jeff Palmer A request to consolidate two (2) parcels into one (1) parcel. Subject property is located at 815 Alabama Street (Southwest corner of Alabama Street and Indianapolis Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption,!'Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. According to Staff, this request is a follow-up Exception and Use Permit approved by the Board garage was approved for the site with less than (221), and the applicant agreed to purchase the of land and incorporate it into the site. The made and radius is correct. Staff recommended to a Conditional earlier this year. A twenty-two feet four foot (41) strip dedications have been approval for a Waiver. -14- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, August 6, Page 15 H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments 1986 Staff assured Les Evans improvements were installed. Mr. Evans said he would vote for approval of the Waiver but would not sign the map until he had verified the information. The applicant, Jeff Palmer, was present and agreed to the conditions as presented. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY KREJCI, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-301 (W) WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR WAIVER: 1. The proposed consolidation complies with the requirements as to area, improvement and design, flood and water drainas control, appropriate and approved public roads, sewer and water facilities, environmental protection, and other requirements of Article 992 of the Subdivision Section of the Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on July 22, 1986, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk's office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith There was no further business to be presented to the Board for their review. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY KREJCI, THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, AUGUST 11, 1986, AT 10:00 A.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -15- 8/6/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments August 6, 1986 Page 16 AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Vincent NOES: None ABSENT: Smith '�ALaZY/ Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh (5876d) -16- . 8/6/86 - BZA