HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-08-12 (12)MINCTI'ES
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, August 12, 1986
Mayor/Chairman Mandic called the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council
and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Ifuntington Beach to order at 7:30
P.M.
COUNCIL/AGENCY ROLL CALL
Present: MacAllister, Mandic, Bailey, Green
Absent; Kelly, Finley, Thomas
Mayor/Chairman Mandic announced that a joint meeting of the City Council and
the Planning Commission had been called.
PLANNING COMMISSION R XL CALL
Present: Winchell, Rowe, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Schumacher
Absent: Mirjahanger
- PHASE II - S'mw To PROCEED Wrm mAL - AD IOC
COMT- TEE TO XEVIEW 3 PFCIPoSALS - PIERSIIZ VILLAGE - APPROVED IN CO 4=T
TIM HNM APPFDVAL - EMM APPROVED IN =9ZPT TIED TO PIERSIDE VILiAW
STAFF TO W= W CN HO► M DESIGH
The Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment informed Council/Agency and Plan-
ning Commission they had been provided with material from A-M Equities, Bryant
L, Morris Development and Paragon Hotels.
Discussion was held regarding the objective of the Study Session of redevelop-
ment projects of Phase I, Phase II and Pierside Village. Staff stated their
objective -was to obtain conceptual approval of the projects so the entitlement
process could begin and the Planning Commission could begin public hearings on
the projects.
The role of the Project Area Committee was discussed. The Chairman of the
Planning Commission requested a flow chart of the Committee, the minutes of
the last meeting of the Committee and a copy of the development standards for
the Project Areas under discussion.
Discussion was Feld regarding methods used to inform the public regarding
redevelopment in the downtown area.
23
Page 2 - Council Minutes - 8/12/86
Phase II - Staff to Proceed with DDA - Ad Hoc Committee to Review Alternative
PrSubmitted BT Develcper
Mike Adams, Principal Redevelopment Planner, reviewed the development stan-
dards of Phase Ii.
]man Saleca, developer, described the project.
Discussion was held regarding density of Phase II.
The need for all three projects to work together as a harmonious whole was
emphasized. The City Administrator stated that 3D/International is preparing
the planning tools necessary to study the area as a whole to ensure all three
projects would work together and would meet development standards of the Spec -
if ic Plan.
In response to questions by Councilman Green staff stated they had responded
to the letter dated August 4, 1986 from Jack's Surf and Sports and to the let-
ter from Jerry Bame. In response to questioning staff stated they held a num-
ber of meetings with the Worthy family.
Discussion was held regarding the developer's request for a density bonus and
for credit for a plaza area to be designed for the second floor. Mike Adams
stated that without it the second floor commercial area would not be feasible.
Parking for the downtown area as a whole and parking for Phase II was dis-
cussed.
Following discussion, a motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Green, to
direct staff to move forward with the Phase ii Developer Disposition Agreement
and to provide the Ad Hoc Committee with three economic phases: one as pro-
posed, one adhering strictly to the Specific Plan and one with less density
(240); and to direct the Ad Hoc Committee to report their findings to Coun-
cil/Agency August 18, 1986. The motion carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kelly, Finley, Thomas
The Mayer called a recess of Council at 9:00 P.M. The meeting was.reconvened
at 9:08 P.M.
Piexside Village - Concept Approved Tied into Approval of Hotel Project
Discussion was held regarding open space, parking and height of the proposed
Pierside Village.
Mike Adams reviewed the development standards for the pier construction, pub-
lic access and required parking.
Page 3 - Council Minutes - 8/12/86
Discussion was held regarding existing beach concessionaires, access for bicy-
clists, parking and view corridors.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Green, to accept the Pierside
Village, in concept, so the entitlement process can begin with the understand-
ing the intent of the motion is that the project will be tied in with the con-
ceptual approval of the Paragon Hotel Project. The motion carried by the fol-
lowing roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kelly, Finley, Thomas
Hotel - Approved in Concept Tied into Pierside
Discussion was held regarding design of the proposed Paragon Lotel and the
proposed setbacks.
The proposed theater complex was discussed and a dinner theE. :r was sug-
gested. Councilman MacAllister suggested that staff review other alternatives
to a theater complex.
The bulk and length of the design of the proposed hotel along Pacific Coast
Highway was discussed. Staff presented a model depicting an alternate design
for the hotel. The developer stated he had studied many alternative designs
and believed that the design presented was the best solution.
Following discussion, a motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Green, to
approve the concept of the hotel, the rooms and amenities, but not the design,
with the intent that the project be tied together with the conceptual approval
of the Pierside Village; and to direct staff to work with the developer to
minimize the bulkiness of the project and to return an alternate design to
Council/Agency at a meeting to be scheduled. The motion carried by the fol-
lowing roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Mandie, Bailey, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kelly, Finley, Thomas
L'1 . tE� 1�. •! y 4r � �i
The Chairman of the Planning Commission adjourned to 6:00 P.M., Tuesday,
August 19, 1986.
HR-6 - TO BE OCKSIDERF.D 8/18/86
Discussion was held regarding a telegram that inadvertently stated the City's
opposition to omnibus Bill HR-6. Section 1199R of omnibus Bill HR-6 is des-
cribed as legislation providing for funding for development of the Bolsa
Chica. At an earlier meeting the City Administrator stated he had received
additional information which indicated that any benefit district would have to
comply with state law and it would be up to the state to pass such enabling
legislation.
2
Page 4 - Council Minutes - 8/12/86
Following considerable discussion between Council and staff it was the consen-
sus of Council to direct staff to provide Council with a copy of the telegram
and the latest information regarding Omnibus Bill HR-6 and to defer considera-
tion of the matter to the August 18, 1986 Council meeting.
The Mayor/Chairman adjourned the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council
and the adjourned regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington 13eadi to 5:30 P.M., Monday, August 18, 1986, Room BrB, Civic Center.
ATTEST:
Alicia M. Wentworth
Ci Clerk/Clerk
BY
Deputy City Clerk C1
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency
and City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City of
Huntin ton.Beach, California
BY" _
Deputy City Clerk .l
Mayor Chairman
1
F
L