Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-09-17MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1986 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Franklin, Patapoff MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1986, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Krejci REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-26 (Cont. from 9/10/86) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach A request to permit the installation of approximately three thousand (3,000) lineal feet of storm drain by the City of Huntington Beach. Subject location is on Warner Avenue in a westerly direction from Lynn Street to Edgewater Lane, then northerly on Edgewater Lane to Courtney Lane. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1 (b), California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff member, Robert Franklin, stated that Bill Patapoff of the Engineering Section, Public Works Department, was present and would describe the project. Mr. Patapoff described the location of the project and said that presently the storm sewers run down the hill and are collected in a storm drain in the Huntington Harbour Yacht Club area which then goes into the Bay itself. By construction of the master plan storm drain (as shown on the L. D. King Plan adopted by City Council), this will alleviate the situation. Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 2 Daryl Smith asked if the City proposed to provide a desiltation box or system to prevent siltation from entering the Bay and Mr. Patapoff replied in the affirmative. Mr. Smith then inquired how the siltation would be removed and Mr. Patapoff replied the City maintenance people would vacuum it out of the box. Dennis Krejci asked Staff to read the Findings and Conditions proposed for the project and Staff also explained the Coastal Development Permit was required because of the cost of the project. Daryl Smith asked that two additional restrictions be added - one that the City provide desiltation basins at appropriate locations and, secondly, that the desiltation basins be maintained at all times to prevent excess siltation from entering Huntington Harbour Bay. The Public Hearing was opened by Chairman Tom Poe and, as previously noted, Bill Patapoff was present to represent the applicant. A resident of the area, John DeLeonardi, asked if the project would alleviate the flooding on his street and Mr. Patapoff stated it would eventually pick up everything. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-26 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND AMENDED CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed installation of the 3,000 lineal feet of storm drain conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 2. The Coastal Development Permit is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. The proposed installation of the 3,000 lineal feet of storm drain can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 4. The proposed installation of the 3,000 lineal feet of storm drain conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan dated August 19, 1986, shall be the approved layout. -2- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 3 2. Provide desiltation basins at appropriate locations to satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 3. Desiltation basin shall be maintained at all times to prevent excess siltation from entering into the Huntington Harbour Bay. AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: None REVOCATION OF HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 86-2 Licensee: J & H Painting/Geri Evans Ryan GENERAL REASON: Alleged violation of Section S. 9730.36 (a), (b), c , an h), Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, referring to storing of equipment and vehicles used in the business at the home in conjunction with the Home Occupation Permit. GENERAL LOCATION: Subject property is located at 19731 Sacramento ane es si a of Sacramento Lane at intersection with Boise Drive). Staff stated information had been received from the Land Use Division indicating that there have been alleged violations of the licensee's Home Occupation Permit. Staff explained that when a resident wishes to conduct a business from his home, he must agree to abide by rules and regulations stipulated in the Ordinance Code. Everything Staff has discerned from Don Shaw, Land Use Technician, and adjacent property owners, the licensee is in violation of these Code requirements. Staff read a letter which had been received from adjacent residents, Mr, and Mrs. Paul P. Patapoff, and asked that it be entered into the Minutes of the Meeting. It is as follows: "September 15, 1986 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ATTN: Michael Strange, Planning Dept. RE: 19731 Sacramento Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dear Mr. Strange: As per our conversation of September 11, 1986, I am sending this letter for the Public Hearing on September 17, 1986. I am unable to attend because of serious illness in my immediate family. -3- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 4 Approximately five months ago, every week day morning between 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., our R-1 neighborhood was and is invaded by two or more paint trucks - one black, one.orange.and one.white.. The trucks are parked illegally in the street. The men sit in the trucks or stand around drinking beverages and/or smoking. They knock on the door of the Sacramento Lane address above. Conversation is carried on in front of the house on the sidewalk or driveway with the owners and papers are passed. At times, the garage door is opened to obtain supplies. On.occasion a truck is left parked in the area for the day. At times, the workmen leave their own personal vehicles parked in the neighborhood for the day. The same procedure is followed when the workmen return at the end of their work day. We don't need the noise and pollution in our residential area that should be in a commercial or industrial area. We are in favor of Revocation of Home Occupation Permit No. 86-2. Very truly yours, /s/ Mr. and Mrs. Paul P. Patapoff Mr. and Mrs. Paul P. Patapoff 8532 Boise Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646" Staff reported the letter had itemized four or five things which were in violation of the Ordinance Code covering home businesses, and Staff is recommending that the Home Occupation Permit be revoked. Tom Poe asked if there had been other reports of violations prior'to this since the file seemed to indicate a ten (10) year span for this home business. Staff explained the original permit had been obtained in 1976 and another permit requested in 1986 because of a transfer of ownership. Staff further said it was his understanding from Don Shaw (who was on vacation and could not attend today's hearing) that clearance had not been obtained from Zoning. After a request from Les Evans, Staff read information regarding the specific items in the Ordinance ,Code which were allegedly being violated. Michael Strange stated the licensee had indicated'on the application that the residence would be used for office space only not other uses. Daryl Smith said he felt if there had been previous problems with the licensee, the City would have received prior complaints.. Mr. Smith further stated he would hesitate to approve action which would take a man's business away from him and suggested maybe a thirty (30) day suspension could be granted. -4- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 5 The Public Hearing was opened and John T. McGlashan, 19712 Sacramento Lane, stated that the present owners (Mr. and Mrs. Ryan) had only lived there approximately five to six months. He further stated that since the Ryans had moved into the area, they had made a shambles of the neighborhood. He said their workers were coming to the Ryan's residence, trucks were parked illegally, paint was being mixed in the garage which could cause fires in the neighborhood, and he did not need an alarm clock because the Ryan's workers awakened him every morning at 6:30 A.M. Mr. McGlashan further stated he and other neighbors had previously contacted the Planing Commission relative to these problems. Gilbert E. Hill, Jr., 19721 Sacramento Lane, explained that the previous owners of the residence had three (3) McDonald's restaurants and only had an office in their home. The permit was not for a painting business or anything like that. He further stated the present owners are dispatching their employees from the residence - that the employees come to the residence early in the morning and get their assignments for the day. Joseph J. Ryan, 19731 Sacramento Lane, stated he was speaking in behalf of his wife, Geri Evans Ryan, who was also present. Mr. Ryan said his wife ran the painting business which she had purchased from her friend. According to Mr. Ryan, there was a lot of "stuff" stored in the garage because he and Mrs. Ryan had just been married in February and they had combined the belongings of two families Mr. Ryan stated the painters do come to their home and pick up their assignments but do not leave their cars or trucks parked there. He further stated there was an one hundred and forty foot (1401) block wall adjacent to Gil's (Mr. Hill's) property. Mr. Ryan said he occasionally parked his personal van along that wall before Mr. Hill addressed him with language which could not be repeated at the meeting. Mr. Ryan mentioned he was attempting to rent an office in Costa Mesa and would make every effort to comply with the Ordinance Code regulations; however, he wanted the Board to be aware there were other -people in his tract who were operating businesses from their homes and many of them were in violation of these same regulations. Michael Strange and Les Evans informed Mr. Ryan those issues were not before the Board and Mr. Ryan could, if he so desired, file an official complaint through the Land Use Division against those businesses. Mrs. Ryan stated they had workers in their home because their home was being remodeled and that was the reason paint was being mixed in the garage. She further said her painters only did work on her home when they did not have jobs in other locations. Les Evans attempted -5- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning -Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 6 unsuccessfully,to obtain a set time limit from Mrs. Ryan for completion of the remodeling. Mr. Evans then suggested it might be wise for Mrs. Ryan to complete the work as quickly as possible to prevent further problems with her neighbors. Daryl Smith asked Mr. and Mrs. Ryan, in the event the Board did contemplate approving continuance of this Home Occupation Permit, if they could have everything cleared up by Monday morning. Mr. Ryan stated in the affirmative. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the Revocation so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY STRANGE, OCCUPATION PERMIT NO. 86-2 WAS NOT APPROVED. UNTIL SEPTEMBER 22, 1986, TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDINANCE CODE OR BE BROUGHT BACK BEFORE THE ACTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-48 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-45 Applicant: John DeLeonardi REVOCATION OF HOME LICENSEE WAS GIVEN HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD FOR FURTHER A request to permit construction of an 11,650 Square Foot industrial building. Subject property is located on the East side of Palmdale Street just North of Cedar Avenue. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86-45. Staff informed the Board this application would be followed by other Administrative Review requests for industrial buildings and a Tentative Parcel Map for consolidation of two (2) parcels at this location. Staff mentioned the lot sizes were ten feet (101) less than the City requires and approval of these Administrative Reviews would trigger approval of the lot sizes. Staff further stated he had evaluated the overall project and minor modifications were required to the plans which Staff felt could be addressed in the Conditions of Approval. Staff stated he would recommend approval of the project with conditions. Tom Poe stated that Staff's recommendation for posting and marking service roads and fire lanes would not be needed. Daryl Smith then asked Staff if the plans met Code requirements except for these minor modifications and Staff said it did. Dennis Krejci stated he did not feel comfortable approving a site plan which was so grossly 1 -6- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 7 incomplete - that the handicap parking did not appear adequate, street widths were not correct, etc. Mr. Krejci asked Staff if the applicant had not promised to bring a revised plan to him on the past Monday and Staff replied in the affirmative. Mr. Krejci suggested that a continuance might be granted to give the applicant time to submit revised plans. The applicant, John DeLeonardi, stated he would have no problems meeting the minor modifications and said his Architect was out of town when the project was first submitted. He further mentioned a meeting which had been held in the early stages of the project with James W. Palin, Director of Development Services, and Les Evans, City Engineer. Mr. DeLeonardi assured the Board that if he had problems meeting the conditions, he would reapply at a later date - that he did not want a continuance. Daryl Smith stated he could understand Mr. Krejci's reluctance to approve the site plan; however, Mr. Smith felt the items could be handled through the conditions. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO, 86-11 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-45 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDED CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A revised site plan, floor plans, and elevations shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Provide turnaround area at the end of the drive aisle. b. Provide trash enclosure behind front setback with self closing doors. Materials shall be architecturally compatible with the main building. c. Locate utility transformer behind front setback and screen from view from the public street. 2. Elevations shall be approved by the Department of Development Services. Submit samples of exact colors and building materials. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating Parcels 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: -7- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 1.7, 1986 Page' 8 a. Landscape -and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (2")-. 6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall' be,of radius type construction. 7. Street widths shall comply°with Public Works Department requirements. 8. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 9. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. 10. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building. 11. All signs shall be brought into compliance with Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All freestanding signs shall be low -profile, monument -type signs. - 12. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations -of water heaters and central heating units. 13. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 14. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the -South Coast Air Quality Management District. 3. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State,'and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. -8- 9/17/86 - BZA 1 Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 9 4. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. 5. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. AYES: Evans, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: Krejci ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-49 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-50 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-51 Applicant: John DeLeonardi ART 86-49: A request to permit construction of a 7,450 Square Foot industrial building. AR 86-50: A request to permit construction of a 7,450 Square Foot in us real building. AR 86-51: industrial A request building. to permit construction of a 51700 Square Foot Subject property is located on the East side of Palmdale Street just North of Cedar Avenue. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff noted these buildings were part of the same project and subject to the same basic conditions as those just approved by the Board. Staff recommended approval with conditions. The applicant, John DeLeonardi, was present and agreed to the minor modifications as presented by Staff and amended by the Board. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-49, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-50, AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-51 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 86-49: 1. A revised site plan, floor plans, and elevations shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Provide turnaround area at the end of the drive aisle. -9- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 171 1986 Page 10 b. Provide -trash enclosure behind front setback with self closing doors. Materials shall be -architecturally compatible with the main building. c. Locate utility transformer behind front setback and screen from view from the public street. 2. Elevations shall be approved by the Department of'Development Services. Submit samples of --exact colors and building materials. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating Parcels 5, 6, 7; 8, and 12. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. Maximum separation -between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches 6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. 7. Street widths shall comply with Public Works Department requirements. 8. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 9. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. 10. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building. 11. All signs shall be brought into compliance with Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All freestanding signs shall be low -profile, monument -type signs. - 12. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters and central heating units. -10- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 11 13. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 14. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-49: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 3. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 4. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. 5. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-50: 1. A revised site plan, floor plans, and elevations shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Provide turnaround area at the end of the drive aisle. b. Provide trash enclosure behind front setback with self closing doors. Materials shall be architecturally compatible with the main building. c. Locate utility transformer behind front setback and screen from view from the public street. 2. Elevations shall be approved by the Department of Development Services. Submit samples of exact colors and building materials. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating Parcels 5, 6, 71 81 and 12. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: -11- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 171 1986 Page 12 a`," Landscape and -:irrigation -plan to,the:Department­of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. Landscape area, -in front,of=proposed building= shall be bermed.- - -' b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate,scieening;of:all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall.delineate-the.'type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. Maximum separation"between.building;wall',and-property line shall not exceed two inches 6. Driveway approaches'shall,•be a=minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. 7. Street widths shall comply with Public,Works•Department requirements. 8. An'automatic fire sprinkler'-system=shall�-be approved -and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 9. There' "shall be no' outside%storage�-of vehicles°, vehicle= parts, equipment 'or= trailers.; " . ' 10. Allrepair: work `shall' be condubted, wholly"'_-within.'the-building. 11. All -'signs shall be=•brought into-compliance�•with- Articie- 961 of the Huntington Beach-'OrdinanceCCode: A,ll-freestanding-signs shall be low -profile, monument -type signs. 12. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters' and central 'heating units: 13. Low-volume'heads-shall be-used.on'all•spigots and water faucets. 14. All building -spoils; such -:es -unusable lumberl wire, pipe, and other',surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION -ON SPECIFIC-CODE,'REQUIREMENTS.'-. ADMINISTRATIVE•REVIEW NO. 86-50: 1. The 'development•'shall- comply. with -all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code-,�Building`Division, and�Fire=Department. _ 2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. _-• -12- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 13 3. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 4. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. 5. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-51: 1. A revised site plan, floor plans, and elevations shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Provide turnaround area at the end of the drive aisle. b. Provide trash enclosure behind front setback with self closing doors. Materials shall be architecturally compatible with the main building. c. Locate utility transformer behind front setback and screen from view from the public street. 2. Elevations shall be approved by the Department of Development Services. Submit samples of exact colors and building materials. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating Parcels 5, 61 71 81 and 12. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (20). 6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. -13- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 14 7. Street widths shall comply with Public Works Department requirements. 8. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 9. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. 10. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building. 11. All signs shall be brought into compliance with Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All freestanding signs shall be low -profile, monument -type signs. 12. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters and central heating units. 13. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 14. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 86-51: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 3. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 4. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. 5. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. AYES: Evans, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: Krejci ABSENT: None -14- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 15 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-314 Applicant: John DeLeonardi A request to consolidate five (5) parcels into four (4) parcels. Subject property is located on the East side of Palmdale Street three hundred fifty feet (3501) in a northerly direction from Cedar Avenue. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984. Staff reported this parcel map covered the same project as the Negative Declaration and Administrative Reviews which the Board had just approved. Staff recommended approval with conditions. There was a discussion between Staff and Les Evans relative to an area shown on the map. Les Evans stated it would need to be dedicated to the City as an alley. The applicant, John DeLeonardi, was present and agreed to the conditions for the parcel map. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY POE, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-314 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed consolidation of five (5) parcels for purposes of industrial use in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for community business district allowing industrial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed consolidation are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. -15- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of zoning Adjustments September 17,-1986 Page 16 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on September 10, 1986, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by -the Department Of Public Works and recorded with -'the -Orange County Recorder. 3. The alley shall be•dedicated-to City'standards. 4. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department -of Development Services. --.,- AYES: Evans, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: Krejci ABSENT: None - TENTATIVE PARCEL'MAP NO. 86-341 Applicant: Erich Ziebarth A request to consolidate two -(2) parcels -into one (1-)-parcel.- Subject-'property-is located at 415 Crest Avenue (South side of Crest Avenue approximately fifty feet (501) East of Twelfth Street). This request -is covered by Categorical -Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1984•. Staff reminded the Board this was a follow-up on a Conditional Exception which -had been previously approved . At -the time of approval, the applicant requested a front yard setback for an addition to his residence. If the Board approves the parcel map, this approval will eliminate a lot line -which runs under the residence. Staff recommends approval -with conditions•for a�Waiver. The applicant, Erich Ziebarth, was present and agreed to the conditions. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY KREJCI, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-341 WAS APPROVED FOR A WAIVER, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL,FOR WAIVER: 1. The proposed consolidation complies with the=requirements=as to area, improvement and design, flood and water drainage control, appropriate and approved public roads, sewer and water -16- 9/17/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments September 17, 1986 Page 17 facilities, environmental protection, and other requirements of Article 992 of the Subdivision Section of the Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Development Services on August 26, 1986, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk's office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property. AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: None There was no further business to be presented to the Board for their review. UPON MOTION BY STRANGE AND SECOND BY EVANS, THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1986, AT 10:00 A.M., BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: None 4 1 len K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh (6278d) -17- 9/17/86 - BZA