HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-10-20MINUTES
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, .Califorria
Monday, October 20, 1986
Mayor Mandic called the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:OO P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
Absent: Kelly, Thomas
CLOSED SESSION
The Mayor called a Closed Session of Council to order at 7:00 P.M., to meet
with its designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pursuant
to Government Code Section 54957.6.
RECESS - RECONVENE
The Mayor called a recess of Council at 7:00 P.M. The meeting was reconvened
at 7:30 F.M.
The Mayor declared the .adjourned regular meeting of the Council of the City of
Huntington Beach adjourned.
ATTEST:
•
Ci ty Cle rk
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
Mayor
PS
MINUTES
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, October 20, 1986
A tape recording of this meeting is
on file in the City Clerk's Office
Mayor Mandic called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 F.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION
The Flag Ceremony was conducted by Girl Scout Cadet Troop #1851, Co -Leaders,
Marilyn Thorp & Margaret Nerio. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Jennifer
Giradina. The Invocation was given by Marilyn Yosick.
ROLL CALL
Present: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
Absent: bone
PRESENTATION - FROM MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING (MADD) TO POLICE OFFICERS
FUERSTEIN AND MOORE
Laurie McCarthy, representative from M.A.D.D. (Mothers Against Drunk Driving),
presented awards to Police Officers Irwin Fuerstein and Greg Moore for their
outstanding performance in helping curtail drunk driving in Huntington Beach.
PRESENTATION - TO BOB WERTH AND GISELA CAMPAGNE CO -CHAIRPERSONS FOR YOUTH
MONTH
Councilwoman Bailey presented Certificates of Pride to Bob Werth and Gisela
Campagne for serving as co -chairpersons for Youth Month during the Month of
October for the Pride Committee.
PRESENTATION - MISS HUNTINGTON BEACH CYNIDY CALDWELL
Mayor Mandic presented keys to the City to Miss Huntington Beach Cyndy
Caldwell and her court - Alexis Horvath, Teresa Miller, Wendy Rockwell and
Jalleen Bullock. The Director of the Pageant Ann Miller, Carole Ann Wall,
President of the Womens Division of the Chamber of Commerce and Gordon
Wheatley who has been Master of Ceremonies for the Pageant for 17 years
assisted with the presentations. Jill Gray, past Miss Huntington Beach, could
not be present.
j
Page 2 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
PRESENTATION - GORDON WHEATLEY - MASTER OF CEREMONIES FOR MISS HUNTINGTON
BEACH PAGEANT
The Mayor presented a plaque to Mr. Gordon Wheatley, Master of Ceremonies for
the Pageant.
PRESENTATION - JEAN SCHUMACHER - PLANNING COMMISSION
Mayor Mandic presented a Commemorative Plate to Jean Schumacher for her years
of service on the Planning Commission.
MEETING ADJOURNMENT SCHEDULED FOR APPROXIMATELY 11:30 P.M.
Following discussion it was the consensus of Council to adjourn the Council
meeting of October 20, 1986 at approximately 11:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED OPEN TO 11/3/86 - ZONE CHANGE 86-18 - ORD NO 2880
- BUILDING HEIGHTS
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider Zone Change 86-18, initiated by the City, for an area proximate to
Main Street between llth and Palm Streets. Said Zone Change is from R2 to (Q)
R2 with the "Q" designation limiting building height to two stories.
Negative Declaration 86-43 assessing the environmental effects of said zone
change will also be considered by Council.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi-
cation and posting had been met, and that she had received an informal peti-
tion submitted listing approximately 93 signatures of owners and residents
favoring Zone Change 86-18.
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2880 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 11-6-11 TO PROVIDE A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO QUALIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT AND RESTRICTING THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO TWO STORIES IN AN AREA PROXI-
MATE TO MAIN STREET BETWEEN ELEVENTH STREET AND PALM STREET (ZONE CASE
NO.86-18)."
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to continue consideration
of Negative Declaration 86-43, Zone Change 86-18 and Ordinance No. 2880 to
November 3, 1986. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mandic
ABSENT: None
1
Page 3 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED OPEN TO 11/3/86 - PROPOSED ORDINANCE 2870 -
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider a proposed city -,ride Property Maintenance Ordinance which will be
incorporated into the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. The intent of this
ordinance is to provide the City the authority to identify and provide a pro-
cedure for abatement of deteriorating or poorly maintained structures and/or
properties.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and post-
ing had been met, and that she had received no communications or written pro-
tests to the matter.
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2870 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE BY AMENDING TITLE 17 ADDING THERETO NEW CHAPTER 17.10 SECTIONS 17.10.010
THROUGH 17.10.180 ENTITLED "PROPERTY MAINTENANCE."
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to continue the open pub-
lic hearing to consider proposed Ordinance No. 2870 to November 3, 1986.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED OPEN TO 11/3/86 - CODE AMENDMENT 86-10 - ORD
NO 2979 - NON -CONFORMING USES
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider Code Amendment 86-10, initiated by the City of Huntington Beach which
would rewrite the non -conforming provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code by repealing Article 971 and adding new Article 965 and to modify provi-
sions governing the reconstruction of non -conforming residential structures.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi-
cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications
or written protests to the matter.
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2879 for Council consideration -- "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 971 AND ADDING THERETO ARTICLE 965 ENTITLED
"NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS." (Up to 10 residential units could be completely
rebuilt)
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to continue the open pub-
lic hearing to consider Code Amendment 86-10 and Ordinance No. 2979 to
November 3, 1986. The motion carried by the .following roll call vote:
131
Page 4 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
JOINT SPECIAL MEETING SCHEDULED 10/27/86 - COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Thomas, to hold a joint Special Meet-
ing October 27, 1986 to consider all the Redevelopment Agency items scheduled
to be heard October 20, 1986. The motion carried unanimously.
HEARING - PLANNING COMMISSION OVERRULED
ZONE CHANGE 86-4 - APPROVED
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
continued open from October 13, 1986 to consider an appeal filed by Councilman
John Thomas to the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Change 86-4, Use Per-
mit 86-7.
Zone Change 86-4 proposes a change of zone from "Oldtown Specific Plan - Dis-
trict 2-0" to "Oldtown Specific Plan - District 2-01.". Use Permit 86-7 - to
develop a consolidated drillsite and oil operation. The subject location is
two blocks bounded by Delaware Street to the east, Huntington Street to the
west, Toronto Avenue to the north and Rochester Avenue to the south. The
Mayor stated that Environmental Impact Report 86-1, assessing the environmen-
tal effects of said proposal would also be considered by the City Council.
The City Clerk announced that an informal petition had been submitted listing
approximately 402 signatures in opposition and that communications in opposi-
tion had been submitted by James E. Walton.
Staff reports were presented by the City Administrator; the Director of Devel-
opment Services, Scott Hess, Assistant Planner; Pam Posten, Assistant Planner;
Jim Crisp, Vice -President of BCL regarding environmental concerns; and Fire
Chief Picard. Planning Commissioner Porter informed to Council as to the rea-
sons why the Planning Commission denied Zone Change 86-4 and denied Use Permit
86-7.
Discussion was held between Mayor Mandic and staff regarding Phase 1 and Phase
2 of the project; and the noise equivalent.
Discussion was held regarding the time to be allowed for public testimony.
Spencer Sheldon, Kevin Williams, D. G. Williams, Edd Schofield, Nick
McLachlan, John Rohrig, Ted Ehring, George Grundt, Kathy Walker, Larry Washa,
Mel Frost, Dr. Ed Helton, Craig Webb, Mickey Shafer, Steven Ber Hansen,
Martha Brock, John Van Haulen, Tom Van Tuyl and Kirk Kirkland spoke in support
of the project.
Stan Lawrence, Robert Richardson, Dean Albright, Sharon Sarkis, Rachael
Kaloian, Jason Rosen, Paula Rosen, Michael Craig, Dolores Walton, Lynn
Moseman, G. T. Lee, Nancy Hartmann presented certified copy of CC&R's, Peter
Fassnacht, Steven Ganetos, Lucille Battu, Michael Kalolan, George Corr , Mark
Conley, Dirk Hartmann spoke in opposition to the project.
1
`42
Page 5 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
Discussion was held regarding whether to close the public hearing and continue
with the rest of the agenda.
A motion was made by Kelly, seconded by Bailey, to close the public hearing
and to continue discussion of the matter at the present time. The motion car-
ried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Bailey, Thomas
NOES: Mandic, Green
ABSENT: None
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2876 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM OLD -
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX TO OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
(DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILLING PURPOSES ON REAL PROPERTY GENER-
ALLY LOCATED BETWEEN DELAWARE STREET TO THE EAST, ROCHESTER AVENUE TO THE
SOUTH, CALIFORNIA STREET TO THE WEST, AND SPRINGFIELD AVENUE TO THE NORTH."
(ZONE CHANGE #86-4)".
The City Attorney stated that CC&R's were only enforceable between the private
parties who own the property. She stated there was no conflict of interest to
disallow Councilman Thomas from voting on the issue. She referred to a letter
from Angus Petroleum stating that there was no existing contract between Angus
Petroleum and Councilman Thomas.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Finley, to uphold the decision of the
Planning Commission and approve Environmental Impact Report 86-1, and deny
Zone Change 86-4 with findings set forth in the October 13, 1986 RCA and to
Ceny Use Permit 86-7 with revised findings as set forth in the October 13,
1986 RCA. Following discussion, the motion failed by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Finley, Mandic, Bailey
NOES: Kelly, MacAllister, Green, Thomas
ABSENT: None
A motion was made by Green, seconded by Kelly, to certify Environmental Impact
Report 86-1 as adequate and in conformance with California Environmental
Impact Report Guidelines and to overrule the Planning Commission decision and
approve Zone Change 86-4 and Use Permit 86-7 with findings and conditions as
amended to include optional Condition No. 55 pertaining to a five member
review committee.to monitor and inspect the project; Condition No. 56 pertain-
ing to the one million dollar trust fund that Angus Petroleum Corporation is
prepared to establish per the letter from Angus received October 17, 1986;
Condition No. 57 pertaining to video camera scanning the drill site that can
be viewed by 24-hour security personnel at the tank farm site; and amending
Condition No. 13 to change the words to read '...50 dBA...", and to approve
introduction of Ordinance No. 2876, after reading by title; the findings and
conditions are as follows:
Findings for Approval - Zone Change No. 86-4:
1. A change if zone from "Oldtown.Specific Plan, District Two-O" (Oil Opera-
tions excluding Oil Drilling) to "Oldtown Specific Plan, District Two-01"
(Oil Operations including Oil Drilling) will be compatible with surround-
Page 6 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
ing residential uses based on the mitigation measures described in the
environmental impact report and conditions of approval outlined in the use
permit.
2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and policies of the
General Plan. Unitization and consolidation of existing oil operations
is encouraged because it reduces the land area used for oil facilities.
Approximately 5.3 acres of developable land will become available after
the consolidation on the two blocks (3.1 acres).
3. Compliance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the
use permit conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed use
allowed by the zone change will not be detrimental to the general health,
welfare, and safety of the community.
Findings for A roval - Use Permit No. 86-7:
I. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the oil operation will
not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working
in the vicinity, property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or
building based on the conditions of approval and compliance with Title 15
of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code.
2. The proposed oil operation is consistent with the goals and objectives of
the General Plan. Oil activities are a consistent use in any land use
category of the General Plan.
3. The project will consolidate oil operations in one location reducing the
visual impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Springfield Oil
Field area. Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and
noise reduction purposes. The project will result in the abandonment and
reclamation of 34 existing wells and 16 oil storage tanks in the Spring-
field Oil Field area and will not significantly
increase traffic in that area.
4. The project will result in increased tax revenues for the City of Hunt-
ington Beach and other governmental agencies.
5. The conditions of approval are desirable and necessary in order to effec-
tuate the purposes of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, the official
General Plan Land Use Plan and the best interests of the City. Further,
they include mitigation measures set forth in the final Environmental
Impact Report that will assure the location is suitable for the type of
use proposed and the following will not result or be reasonably anticipa-
ted from the project: damage or nuisance from noise, smoke, odor, dust or
vibration; hazards from explosion, contamination or fire; hazards occa-
sioned by unusual volumes or character of traffic; incompatibility with
surrounding development. And, the project complies with all requirements
of Division 9 and other applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach
Municipal Code.
6. The conditions imposed include requirements of plans for the disposition
of oil wells and for oil operations on the property involved, and for
berms, walls and landscaping to provide maximum feasible screening of
equipment and facilities.
0
L
Y :144
Page 7 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
7. Changes have been required and incorporated in the project during the
course of the public hearing and consultation process to mitigate or
avoid the significant adverse environmental effects of the project; the
Division of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations for the conduct of
secondary recovery operations; the mitigation measures incorporated, pro-
posed and adopted, together with application of the rules and regulations
of the Division of Oil and Gas, will effectively mitigate all of the
adverse impacts identified; public agencies other than the City, Includ-
ing the Division of Oil and Gas, Regional Water Quality Control Board and
South Coast Air Quality Management District, will be reviewing aspects of
this project for mitigation measures as to matters within their responsi-
bility and jurisdiction, including subsurface operation, water and air
quality; the critical need for oil renders infeasible the alternatives of
no project or delayed project implementation, and alternative surface
locations are infeasible because of their limited availability, or the
greater disruption to the community at large which would result therefrom.
8. The subject location is centrally located within the Springfield Oil
Field area; relocating the proposed project to another site is infeasible.
9. No substantial public purpose would be served by denial of Use Permit No.
86-7 but rather:
(a) It is important that the United States develop its existing oil
reserves in order to meet its energy needs without increasing
dependence on foreign oil, and this project will result in incremen-
tal recovery of approximately five (5) million barrels of oil; and
(b) The project will consolidate oil operations in one location, reduc-
ing the visual impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the
Oldtowa portion of the City; and
(c) Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and noise
reduction purposes; and
(d) The project will be only an interim use of the surface site
involved, and at the termination of the project the site will be
available for recycling into.other uses; and
(e) The project will benefit and accrue to the general welfare of the
City and the public for each of the reasons set forth above.
(f) Approval of this project will reduce the immediate demand for more
off -shore drilling facilities.
10. The proposed oil consolidation project will have 24 hour on -site person-
nel, and will be safer than the existing non -continuous monitoring of the
34 scattered wells to be abandoned throughout the area. This will reduce
the possible attraction of younger persons.
11. The most modern, efficient energy -saving equipment available will be
integrated into the design of the project which will mitigate environmen-
tal impacts such as fire, noise and air pollutants.
Is
Page 8 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
12. The applicant has submitted a property value protection plan which will
be implemented as outlined prior to drilling.
Conditions of Approval - Use Permit No. 86-7:
1. The site plan dated August 15, 1986, and section drawings dated August
27, 1986, shall be the conceptually approved layout.
(a) This use permit shall not become effective until Zone Change No. 86-4
has been approved and in effect.
2. All structures and procedures shall conform to Title 15 of the Huntington
Beach Municipal Code and the Division of Oil and Gas Standards.
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical and building permits.
4. 'Measures to reduce erosion should be used during grading and site prepa-
ration. Grading and construction activity shall take place only during
daylight hours.
5. During grading and excavation, earthmoving crews should observe cuts and
spoils for potential archaeological finds. In the event of a potential
find being located, operations shall be suspended until the significance
of the find is determined.
6. A dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Develop-
ment Services for review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits.
7. Prior to any on -site construction or drilling, the masonry wall and all
landscaping and street improvements shall be installed.
8. Prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation
plan shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services and
Public Works for review and approval.
(a) All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 15.22 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code and all trees shall be minimum 24 inch box type
and spaced no greater than 20 feet on center.
9. Prior to the installation of the office structure, elevations shall be
provided for review and approval by the Development Services department.
(a) The office shall be on a permanent foundation.
(b) A mansard or pitched roof shall be provided.
10. The applicant shall enter into a franchise agreement with the City for
the installation of the underground connection between the two blocks.
11. The proper sealing and abandonment of the existing scattered wells which
will be replaced by this project. shall take place following approval of
this project and must be completed within eighteen (18) months.
Page 9 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
12. The surface of the site shall be completely covered with an appropriate
material (such as gravel) subject to review and approval of Development
Services.
13. A report prepared by an acoustical engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Development Services for review and approval prior to com-
mencing drilling. Said report shall predict and project dBA sound levels
at the Angus Oil Site property line and adjacent residential property
line both with and without an acoustical blanket on the drilling rig and
service rigs. The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures
necessary to assure compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Code and a
maximum noise level at the residential property line of 50 dBA during the
nighttime hours between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM.
(a) A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at man -door
entrances.
14. Noise attenuation for the drilling operation, oil operation and service
operation shall be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and noise report
specified in Condition 13.
(a) If a noise problem occurs, the entire drilling structure shall be
wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation.
15. The project shall fully comply with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance.
lb. No speakers, loud bells or buzzers shall be employed on site.
17. Excessive vibration, as determined by the Director of Development Ser-
vices, shall be reduced to acceptable levels.
18. Light and glare shall be directed and/or screened to prevent "spillage"
onto adjacent residential properties.
19. All heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the following streets between
the 405 freeway and the subject site: Beach Boulevard, Adams Avenue, and
Delaware Street. For entrance to the site only Springfield Avenue and
California Street may be used.
20. Truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM.
(a) No trucks may park on the street.
(b) Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no more than two trucks
shall be on the premises at any one time.
21. All employees must park on either one of the two sites both during con-
struction and after.
22. Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected before and
after construction. Any damage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be ��
repaired and reconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the
applicant.
23. All driveways shall be radius type and constructed to Public Works Stan-
dards.
Page 10 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
24. There shall be no entrance or exit of vehicles from the drilling site
between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM except for emergency purposes.
25. An overload permit should be obtained from City and State (if required)
for all oversized loads to be moved on public streets.
26. Pipe string cementing through fresh water bearing sands shall be imple-
mented to prevent salt water intrusion into the aquifers.
27. A system for collecting, treating, and releasing storm drainage must be
provided by the applicant and approved by Public Works.
28. Excess brine must be treated and a permit obtained, to meet Orange County
Sanitation District and City Fire Department standards prior to being
released into the sewer system.
29. Recycling of produced zone water back to the oil reservoir shall be cert-
ified by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and all its conditions
and restrictions shall be adhered to.
30. Well service rigs shall be operated no more than 48 days per year between
7:00 AM and 7:00 PM or daylight hours, whichever is shorter.
31. No more than four well service rigs may be on the premises at any one
time. The service rigs shall not exceed 100 feet in height and shall be
double muffled and utilize acoustical blankets.
32. All drilling rigs and production wells shall be operated by electrical
motors and electric pumps only.
33. The drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 2 years during
Phase One.
34. Drilling rigs after the two year period for the remaining 16 wells (Phase
Two) shall comply with the conditions herein and may not be installed
After an additional two years. The second phase drilling shall be limi-
ted to 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM only.
35. Drilling derricks shall not exceed 142 feet in height.
36. Upon completion of initial drilling of injection and producer wells, all
drilling rigs shall be removed from the site.
37. Service rigs shall be erected only during maintenance operations.
38. Applicant shall install blowout prevention equipment.
39. A full vapor recovery system shall be installed.
40. Only three on -site crude oil tanks are permitted and shall never be com-
pletely full at once.
41. Prior to issuance of building permits, an emergency action plan, includ-
ing employee training and periodic practice, shall be developed by the
1 applicant with consultation from the City and other regulating agencies.
The plan should include how spillage onto street from site(s) would be
Page 11 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
1
handled (stockpile of sand, etc.); the safe handling of any chemicals and/or
materials, and full knowledge of all systems and emergency equip- ment. A
copy shall be on file with the Fire Department and updated on a five year
basis.
42. All oil must be transported by pipeline.
43. An on -site fire suppression system shall be installed as a primary source
for fire protection.
44. Celler requirements for oil wells:
(a) Must be provided with heat detection system from celler to 24 hour
monitoring location.
(b) Fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must be installed
within 75 feet of travel.
(c) Provide metal open grate covers over top of well cellers.
45. Storage tank requirements:
(a) Must have pre -plumbed foam injection system installed on all product
storage tanks.
(b) Must have exterior deluge water spray system on all storage tanks.
46. Site requirements:
(a) All diked areas must have an engineered drainage system.
(b) Foam storage area and foam quantity to be approved by Fire Depart-
ment.
(c) Fire hydrants to be located in areas approved by Fire Department.
(d) Hydrogen sulfide detection system approved by Fire Department to be
installed on project perimeter.
(e) Fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must be installed
throughout the site.
(f) All gate openings must be 24 feet in width and installation must
comply with Fire Department Specification 403.
47. Well cellars shall be cleaned periodically to prevent waste accumulation.
48. Twenty (20) abandoned wells have been identified within the project area
which do not meet present day abandonment requirements. A contingency
plan shall be outlined and submitted to the Huntington Beach Fire Depart-
ment for review and approval with steps to be taken in the event that
.leakage from any of these abandoned wells finds its way to the surface.
49. Prior to termination of the oil operation, a plan shall be submitted sub-
ject to review and approval of the Fire Department and Development Ser-
vices Department, showing how the site shall be abandoned and restored to
its closest natural state.
Page 12 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
50. There shall be no pipeline construction activity outside the site except
between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM, Monday through Saturday only.
51. The methodology of oil recovery for this project shall be limited to
water injection only. Steam injection shall be prohibited.
52. The operator shall at all times during the term of this use permit and
any renewal or extension thereof, maintain in force an insurance policy
or policies insuring the operator, and as additional insureds the City of
Huntington Beach, the City Council and each member thereof, and every
officer and employee of the City acting in the due course of his employ-
ment or in his official capacity, against liability or financial loss
resulting from any suits, claims or actions brought by any person or per-
sons, and from all costs and expenses of litigation brought against the
insureds, in the amount of not less than $5,000,000 combined single limit
for any injury to persons or damage to property, including (but not limi-
ted to) injury or damage from subsidence and rebound, resulting from the
operator's oil drilling and production activities and operations inciden-
tal thereto. Said policies shall provide that the insurance coverage
shall not be cancelled or reduced by the insurance carrier without the
City having been given at least ten days prior written notice thereof by
such carrier. The operator shall not cancel or reduce said insurance
coverage. At all times during the term of this use permit, and any
renewal or extension thereof, the operator shall maintain on file with
the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of insurance issued by the
carrier or carriers showing that said insurance is in effect in the
amount required above, and a copy of each insurance policy. If the oper-
ator does not keep said insurance in full force and effect, the City may
obtain said insurance and pay the premium thereon, which shall then be
deemed a debt owned by the operator to the City. Any insurance policies
procured by the operator hereunder shall provide that the insurance car-
rier waives all rights of subrogation against the City. If the City
obtains any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy shall include a
waiver by the insurance carrier of all rights of subrogation against the
operator.
53. The City Council shall review and, if necessary, may modify the condi-
tions as set forth in this use permit, at the first regular City Council
meeting following October 20, 19.87, and at five year intervals there-
after, and upon any change in ownership of the project which occurs
between five-year reviews; provided that the phrase "change of ownership"
as used herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a corpora-
tion, partnership or other form of business organization in which Alberta
Natural Gas -United States and/or one or more of its shareholders or sub-
sidiaries owns the controlling interests, or any sale or,trans.fer so long.
as Angus or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the opera-
tion of the project.
54. The Planning Commission/City Council reserves the right to revoke this
use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code occurs.
55. A five member review committee shall be selected by the City Council com-
prised of three property owners, who reside directly adjacent to the pro-
ject site, one member of the Planning Commission and one City Council
member. The Fire Department and Development Services Department shall
1,40
Page 13 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
jointly provide a staff liaison. The purpose of this committee shall be
to monitor and inspect the project on a quarterly basis during the drill-
ing phase: and semi-annually thereafter.
56. The property value protection plan submitted by the applicant shall be
implemented as outlined prior to drilling.
57. In the event that either one of the two blocks is to be without 24-hour
supervision, a video camera shall be employed on --site to provide continu-
ous surveillance which can be monitored by personnel at the other site.
Findi a for Approval - Environmental Impact Report 86-1:
1. The Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines.
2. The Final Environmental Impact Report is an informational document which
informed the City Council and the general public of the environmental
effects of the project and which was read, reviewed and considered by the
City Council before making its decision on the project.
3. The Final. Environmental Impact Report contains discussions of the signi-
ficant environmental, effects which cannot be avoided if the project is
implemented, mitigation measures proposed to minimize the significant
effects, alternatives to the project, the relationship between local
short-term uses of the environment and the maintenance and enhancement of
long-term productivity, statements of significant irreversible environ-
mental changes which will result from the project and the growth -inducing
impact of the action.
4. The Final Environmental Impact Report contains the comments and recom-
mendations received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report a list of
persons, organizations and public agencies consulted and commenting on
the Draft Environmental Impact Report, and responses to significant
environmental questions raised in the review and consultation process, a
notice of completion of the Final Environmental Impact Report was filed
with the Secretary of the Resources Agency as required by law.
5. Since completion of the Final Environmental Impact Report there have been
no substantial changes in the proposed project, or in the circumstances
under which the project is to be undertaken, or new information, which
require its revision; the Final Environmental Impact Report is therefore
certified as complete.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Green, Thomas
NOES: Finley, Mandic, Bailey
ABSENT: None
RECESS - RECONVENE
The Mayor called a recess of Council at 11:20 P.M. The meeting was reconvened
at 11:25 P.M.
r 141
Page 14 -- Council Minutes - 10/20/86
PUBLIC HEARING - OVERRULED PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVED ZONE CHANGE 86-20
WITH FINDINGS - NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-34 - APPROVED - SPECIALISTS ENTER -
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
continued open from October 13, 1986 to consider an appeal filed by Jerome
Bame, Attorney at Law, on behalf of Specialists Enterprises, to the denial by
the Planning Commission of a request to change the zone designation from R5
(Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) which would per-
mit a total of 13 units on two sites which would permit a total of 13 units on
two sites Located at the southeast corner of Cameron Street and Newman Avenue
- (17712 and 17762 Cameron Street) Negative Declaration #86-34 assessing the
environmental effects of the zone change will also be considered by Council.
The Director of Development Services presented a staff report.
Jerome Bame, attorney representing the applicant, distributed three exhibits
to Council and reviewed the history of ownership and zone changes on the pro-
perty.
Mark Aanoason, Director of Humana Hospital, stated that he supported the
requested zone change.
There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no
further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the
Mayor.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to overrule the Planning
Commission and staff and approve Negative Declaration #86-34 and directed the
City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to effect Zone Change 86-20, based on
findings set forth in the RCA dated October 13, 1986 as follows:
Findings of Approval:
1. A general plan amendment is not required for this project as State Law
permits parcels of less than one (1) acre to have zoning that is incon-
sistent with the general plan.
2. Medium high density residential development of the site will be compati-
ble with surrounding land uses.
3. Approval of Zone Change No. 86-20 will not be detrimental to the health,
safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CE 86-44/TT 12756 -
APPEAL WITHDRAWN - JACK BROBERG
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
continued open from September 2, 1986 to consider an appeal filed by Jack
r>Broberg to the denial by the Planning Commission of Conditional Exception No.
`' 86-44 and Tentative Tract No. 12756, a request to permit a reduction in lot
width for two lots within an eight -lot subdivision. The property is located
at 16852 and 16862 Bolsa Chica Street (east side between Warner and Pearce
Drive) in the Q-R2 (Medium Density Residential - Qualified District.)
J
Page 15 -- Council Minutes - 10/20/86
The City Clerk announced that a communication from Jack Broberg, appellant,
had been submitted October 1, 1986 requesting that his appeal be withdrawn.
A motion was made by Finley, seconded by MacAllister, to approve appellant's
request to withdraw his appeal to Planning Commission denial of Conditional
Exception 86-44/Tentative Tract 12756. The motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C HEARING - OVERRULED PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION AND APPROVED SPECIAL
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider an appeal filed by Dan Guggenheim, to the Planning Commission's con-
ditions of approval for Special Sign Permit 86-6. The property for which the
Special Sign Permit is being requested is located at 8885 Riverbend Drive
(storage facility and apartment project at the southwest corner of San Diego
Freeway and Magnolia Street) in the (Q)MI-A and (Q) R3 zone. The Special Sign
Permit request is for the following:
(1) For a freestanding, off --premise sign facing Warner Avenue that exceeds
maximum height, size and setback requirements.
(2) Two wall signs facing the freeway; and
(3) A V-shaped, monument sign facing Magnolia Street.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi-
cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications
or written protests to the matter.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
Dan Guggenheim, applicant, stated the location of the storage business was
landlocked and hidden and that the signs were needed.
There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no
further pretests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the
Mayor.
Discussion was held regarding deletion of the telephone number on the signs.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Finley, to overrule the Planning
Commission decision and grant appeal to Condition 1(a) and 1(c) of the Plan-
ning Commission approval except for the size of the sign which shall be 6 x 8
(48 square feet), with findings, conditions and modifications as set forth in
the October 20, 1986 RCA as follows:
Conditions of A22roval:
1. A revised site plan and elevations shall be submitted in accordance with
the following:
143
Page 16 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
a. Sign A shall be maximum 13 feet in height and the panel shall be
maximum 48 square feet (6' x 8'); minimum 7 feet above sidewalk;
reverse pole position to rear of sign; provide pole cover, delete
telephone number.
b. Sign B shall be a small building entrance or identification sign not
to exceed 10 square feet.
C. Sign C shall be eliminated.
d. The telephone number shall be deleted from Sign D.
e. Sign E is acceptable as requested with the "Space Place" panel
except that the telephone number from the "Rivermeadows" sign shall
be eliminated; location is subject to review and approval by the
Development Services Department and must be setback a minimum of 3
feet from Magnolia right-of-way property line.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARING - 1986 FY HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - APPROVED
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider the proposed Housing Assistance Plan (H.A.P.) which identified the
City goals for federal assistance and is to be submitted to the U. S. Depart-
ment of Housing & Urban Development on or about October 31, 1986. This annual
H.A.P. is for a period of October 1, 1986 through September 30, 1987.
Copies of the H.A.P. are available for review in the City Clerk's Office.
The Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment presented a staff report.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and post-
ing had been met, and that she had received no communications or written pro-
tests to the matter.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests
filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Kelly, to approve the Housing Assis-
tance Plan (HAP) for 1986 Federal Fiscal Year as submitted by staff. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Page 17 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO 5717 - ADOPTED - HOUSING POLICY REPORT - LOW
INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing as
required by S. 1030j(5) of the Internal Revenue Code to consider a proposed
Policy Report to be published by the City of Huntington Beach containing a
statement of the policies regarding housing, development, and low-income hous-
ing assistance to be followed by the City in issuing qualified mortgage bonds
and mortgage credit certificates. The City previously published a Housing
Policies Report for fiscal year ending October 31, 1985. The City complied
during the one-year period preceding this report with the intend of Congress
that the City use its authority to issue qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage
credit certificates to the greatest extend feasible to assist low-income fami-
lies to afford home ownership before assisting higher -income families.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and post-
ing had been met, and that she had received no communications or written pro-
tests to the matter.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests
filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 5717 for Council consideration - "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING AND
DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF A HOUSING POLICIES REPORT."
A motion was made by Kelly, seconded by MacAllister, to adopt Resolution No.
5717. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING - APPEAL TO DENIAL OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT -
SAFARI SAMS
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a administrative
hearing regarding an appeal filed by Gene Dorney, Attorney at Law, on behalf
of Saverio Sam Lanni dba Safari Sams to the City Administrator's denial of an
entertainment permit for Safari Sams, 411 Olive Avenue.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification and
posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written
protests to the matter.
The City Attorney stated that testimony would be heard only as it pertained to
the grounds for denial of the entertainment permit which was that the appli-
cant has not obtained the required Conditional Use Permit and the applicant's
current ABC license prohibits live entertainment.
William Sage, Deputy City Attorney, submitted for the record Exhibit 1 (Down-
town Specific Plan December 1982), Exhibit 2 (Department of Alcoholic Beverage
'15
Page 18 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
Control communication dated April 8, 1985) and Exhibit 3 (Department of Alco-
holic Beverage Control license receipt for operating period April 18, 1985
through December 31, 1985).
Discussion was held between Council and Deputy City Attorney Sage regarding
the matter. Responding to a question by Councilman Kelly, Mr. Sage stated
that District 5 permits live entertainment.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
Gene Dorney_, attorney for the applicant and appellant, stated that the matter
was a Constitutional issue. He stated he did not believe a live entertainment
permit was required in the Specific Downtown Plan District 5. He presented
the history of the previous owner's ABC permit and the present live entertain-
ment permit.
There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests
filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
The City Attorney stated the constitutionality of the ABC conditions was
between the applicant and. ABC.
Discussion was held between Council and staff regarding the matter.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Finley, to refer the entire appeal to
a hearing officer who would take evidence and file a complete report to the
Council for a decision. The motion failed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Finley, Mandic, Bailey
NOES: MacAllister, Kelly, Green, Thomas
ABSENT: None
A motion was made by MacAllister, Green, to uphold the City Administrator's
denial as the applicant has not obtained the required Conditional Use Permit
and the applicant's current ABC license prohibits live entertainment. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Finley, Mandic,.,Green, Thomas
NOES: Bailey
ABSTAIN: Kelly
ABSENT: None
Counellmembers MacAllister and Finley left the meeting at 12:10;A.M.
CONSENT CALENDAR - (ITEMS REMOVED)
Mayor Mandic requested that the item pertaining to handicap access ramps and
sidewalk construction and the item pertaining to the Huntington Central Park
Equestrian Center be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate considera-
tion.
''# A C
1
Page 19 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
CONSENT CALENDAR - (ITEMS APPROVED)
On motion by Thomas, second Kelly, Council approved the following items, as
recommended, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley
MINUTES - Approved and adopted minutes of the special meeting of October 6,
1986 as written and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
PROPERTY DAMAGE & EQUIPMENT LOSS RESULTING FROM BEACH RIOT - Authorized the
transfer of $169,000 from the unappropriated fund balance into the appropriate
Police ($122,100) and Community Services ($46,900) accounts to repair major
property damage, replace vital equipment losses and compensate city employees
for personal loses.
TALBERT AVENUE BIKE TRAIL - GOTHARD STREET TO GOLDENWEST - PLANS & SPECIFICA-
TIONS/CALL FOR BIDS - CC-614 - Approved plans and specifications and author-
ize the call for bids for the construction of the Talbert Avenue Bike Trail
between Gothard and Goldenwest Streets.
- PHASE I
- PLANS & SPECIF
FOR BIDS -
CC-544 - Approved plans and specifications and authorize the call for bids
for the construction of Phase I of McCallen Park located between Huntington
and Delaware Streets, south of Yorktown Avenue.
PARCEL MAP 86-259 - MAX SCHREIBER - Approved final parcel map and accepted
the offer of dedication pursuant to the mandatory findings set forthby the
Board of Zoning Adjustments on property located on the north side of Liberty
Avenue, west of Beach Boulevard, and instructed the City Clerk to execute same
and to release for processing by the County.
BID AWARD - MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS - SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CON-
TRACTING - CC-599 CC-605 (HES MO14-002) CC-537 HESM21-003 - Accepted the
low bid of Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting in the amount of $237,252 for
the construction of traffic signal modifications at the Intersections of Gold-
enwest/Slater, Goldenwest/Heil and Adams/Bushard, hold bid bonds on the lowest
three bidders until execution of contract and filing of bonds and directed the
City'Clerk to notify the unsuccessful bidders and return their bid bonds. The
bids were as follows:
Sierra Pacific Electrical Contract $ 237,252
Steiny and Company, Inc. 245,000
Paul Gardner Corporation 269,962
147
Page 20 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
RESOLUTION NO 5715 - ADOPTED - REQUEST FOR SARFPA MEMBERSHIP FROM CITY OF LOS
ALAMITOS - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
APPROVING THE RATIFICATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS' REQUEST FOR ME1W SHIP
IN THE SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION AGENCY."
AMENDED SUBGRANTEE AGREEMENTS - HCD BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM - Approved and auth-
orized execution of the following Amended Subgrantee Agreements: H. B. Com-
unity Clinic $3,400, Harbor Area Adult Day Care $2,250, Feedback Foundation
2,000, Consolidated Transportation Service Agency $9,660, Women's Transi-
tional Living Center, $2,000, Interval House $2,000, Boys & Girls Club $7,000,
Center for Creative Alternatives $1,690 (Agreements on file in the Clerk's
Office)
RESOLUTION NO 5716 - ADOPTED - TEMPORARY STOCKPILE PERMIT FEE - "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR A
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE PERMIT."
HANDICAP ACCESS RAMPS & SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION - ELLIS/GRAHAM - PLAN & SPECI-
FICATIONS/CALL FOR BIDS - CC-582
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Director of Public Works
regarding access ramps at various locations in the city and sidewalk construc-
tion on Ellis Avenue and Graham Street.
A motion was made by Kelly, seconded by Thomas, to approve plans and specifi-
cations and authorize the call for bids for the construction of handicap
access ramps at various locations throughout city; sidewalk on Ellis Avenue,
east of Beach Boulevard and sidewalk on Graham Street, south of Meadowland
Drive. The motion carried by the following roll call vote;
AYES: Kelly, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: Mandic
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley
HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EOUESTRIAN CENTER - ASSIGNMENT OF CONCESSION
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Director of Community Ser-
vices regarding the Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center.
Discussion was held between Council and staff regarding the landscaping and
retension basin. More detailed information was requested regarding the matter.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Kelly, to continue consideration of
the assignment of concession agreement from Better Built Enterprises to
National Equestrian Center, Inc., to November 3, 1986. The motion carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley
Page 21 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
MOTION TO ADJOURN - FAILED
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Green, to adjourn the City Council of
the- City of Huntington Beach to 7:30 P.M., Monday, October 27,'1986. The
motion failed by the following roll call vote:
AYE'S: Bailey, Green
NOES: Kelly, Mandic, Thomas
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley
Councilwoman Bailey left the meeting at 12:20 P.M.
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Mayor Mandic announced that a joint meeting of the City Council and the Rede-
velopment Agency had been called.
AGENCY ROLL CALL
Present: Kelly, Mandic, Green, Thomas
Absent: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey
MINUTES - CONTINUED TO 10/27/86
By consensus of the Redevelopment Agency the minutes of the Special Meeting of
October 6, 1986 were continued to the meeting of October 27, 1986.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED OPEN TO 10/27/86 - AMENDED DISPOSITION &
nvna.snvava� rsa.iriaeA +i�r�a.�rrir+n.i. vav�r :-
The Mayor/Director announced that this was the day and hour set for a joint
public hearing to consider and act upon the Amended Disposition and Develop-
ment Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach and Huntington Pacifica Development Group and sale of the land pursuaTLt
thereto
The Agreement provides for the development of a first rate high quality hotel,
retail commercial and office space along Main Street and public plaza with a
pedestrian overcrossing of Pacific Coast Highway, to the pier side develop-
ment, within the Main -Pier Redevelopment Project Area. Descriptions of the
sites can be found in the Agreement.
The terms of the lease of property between the Agency and Huntington Pacifica
Development Group are set forth in the Agreement.
The proposed projects are covered by a final Environmental Impact Report for
the Main -Pier Redevelopment Project Area for which a Notice of Preparation was
filed on May 6, 1985.
149
Page 22 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
Copies of the Amended Disposition and Development and the Environmental Impact
Report are on file for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk, City
of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street.
The City Clerk/Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification,
publication and posting had been met, and that she had received no communica-
tions or written protests to the matter.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
A motion was made by Thomas, seconded by Kelly, to continue the open hearing
to October 27, 1986. The motion carried by the following roll call, vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey
JOIXT PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED TO 10/27/86 - LEASE BETWEEN THE REDEVEWP-
MENT AGENCY & PIERSIDE DEVEIAPMENT LTD
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a joint public
hearing to consider and act upon the lease between the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Huntington Beach and Pier Side Development Limited. The Lease
provides for the development of a specialty retail commercial center including
pier rehabilitation and possible pier expansion, within the Main -Pier Redevel-
opment Project Area. Descriptions of the sites can be found in the Lease.
The terms of the lease of property between the Agency and Pierside Development
Limited are set forth in Lease.
The proposed projects are covered by a final Environmental Impact Report for
the Main -Pier Redevelopment Project Area.;
Copies of the Lease and the Environmental Impact Report are on file for public
inspection at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, 2000
Main Street.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi-
cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications
or written protests to the matter.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
A motion was made by Green, seconded by Kelly, to continue the open hearing to
October 27, 1986. The motion carried by the following roil call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey
Page 23 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
1
CONSIDERATION OF MAIN -PIER REDEVELOPMENT MASTER.
NATIONAL - CONTINUED TO 10 27 86
BY
The City Administrator informed Council/Agency they had been provided with a
communication transmitting Resolution No. 131 for Council/Agency considera-
tion - "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH APPROVING A MASTER PLAN TO CONTROL THE INTENSITY OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN A PORTION OF THE MAIN -PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA." (For those
portions of the plan which are within the Main -Pier Project Area generally
bounded by Sixth Street, Palm Avenue, Lake Street and the area encompassed by
the prolongation of Sixth Street and .Lake Street seaward).
A motion was made by Mandic, seconded
Resolution No. 131 to October 27, 1986
roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey
by Kelly, to continue consideration of
The motion carried by the following
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS FOR BEACH BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA - CON-
TDRW TO 10 27 86
The City Clerk/Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator
transmitting a Redevelopment Agency resolution and a City Council resolution
pertaining to the Beach Boulevard Redevelopment Project Area.
The Clerk presented Resolution No. 132 for Agency consideration - "A RESO-
LUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECEIVING
THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH -BEACH BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT, ESTABLISHING THE PROJECT BASE YEAR ASSESSMENT ROLL, AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE FILING OF INFORMATION REQUIR BY SECTIONS 33327 AND 33328 OF
THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW, AND. AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF A FILING FEE TO
THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION."
The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 5718 for Council consideration! - "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CALLING FOR THE
FORMATION OF A PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH -BEACH BOULEVARD
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ESTABLISHING. PROCEDURES THEREFOR."
A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Kelly, to continue consideration of
Resolution No. 132 and Resolution ` No. 5718 to October 27, 1986. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey
ADJOURN AGENCY
The Chairman adjourned the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency to 7:30
P.M.; Monday, October 27, 1986 in the Council Chamber.
LA
Page 24 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
APPROPRIATIONS OF FUNDS - CONTINUED TO 10/27/80 - DOWNTOWN PARKING ISSUE
The City Clerk presented communication from the Chief of Administrative Ser-
vices regarding land acquisition and final design of the downtown parking
facilities.
It was the consensus of Council to continue to October 27, 1986 consideration
of the appropriations of funds pertaining to the downtown parking issue.
ORDINANCE NO. 2859 - CONTINUED TO 1
DRIVE W BEACH BLVD
/86 - ZONE CASE NO 86-2 - S/HAPPY
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2859 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTING70N BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING
FROM QUALIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (Q) (R2-PD) TO
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -SENIOR RESIDENTIAL (R2 SR) ON REAL PROPERTY GENER-
ALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF HAPPY DRIVE AND WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD (ZONE CASE NO.
86-2)."
It was the consensus of Council to continue consideration of Ordinance No.
2859 to October 27, 1986.
ORDINANCE NO 2871 - CONTINUED TO 10/27/86 - PPSA NO 86-1 - WALNUT AVENUE
BETWEEN SIXTH STREET AND LAKE STREET: SIXTH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGH-
WAY AND ORANGE AVENUE: SIXTH STREET BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2871 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE BY ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 86-1 ALIGNING WAL-
NUT AVENUE BETWEEN SIXTH STREET AND LAKE STREET: SIXTH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY AND ORANGE AVENUE: SIXTH STREET BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND LAKH
STREET: ORANGE AVENUE BETWEEN SIXTH STREET AND .THIRD STREET: AND LAKE STREET
BETWEEN ATLNTA AVENUE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY."
It was the consensus of Council to continue consideration of Ordinance No.
2859 to October 27, 1986.
NO 2875 - CONTINUED TO `
/27/86 -
TOCKPILING OF EN
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2875 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BELCH MUNI-
CIPAL CODE BY AMENIDING:CHAPTEK 17.04 BY ADDING THERETO NEW SECTIONS 17.04.100
AND 17..04.110 REFLECTING THE REGULATION OF STOCKPILING OF EARTH MATERIAL UPON
ANY LOT OR PARCEL. OF LAND."
It was the consensus of Council to continue consideration of Ordinance No.
2859 to October 27, 1986.
Page 25 - Council Minutes - 10/20/86
ORDINANCE NO 2878 - CONTINUED TO 10/27/86 - SPEED LIMITS
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2878 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 10.12.030 AND 10.12.040 TO REFLECT SPEED LIM-
ITS." (Yorktown between Goldenwest and Vasile 35 m.p.h. (Yorktown between
Vasile and Ward 40 m.p.h.)
It was the consensus of Council to continue consideration of Ordinance No.
2859 to October 27, 1986.
ORDINANCE NO 2855 - CONTINUED TO 10/27/86 - OVERSIZE VEHICLE PARKING
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2855 for consideration - "AN ORDI-
NANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.44.060, BY NUMBERING THE EXCEPTIONS THERETO AS
SECTION 10.44.065, AND AMENDING SECTION 10.44.070, ALL RELATING TO OVERSIZE
VESICLE PARKING."
It was the consensus of Council to continue consideration of Ordinance No.
2859 to October 27, 1986.
ORDINANCE NO 2882 - CONTINUED TO 10/27/86 - FLEET OPERATION PERMITS
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2882 for Council consideration -- "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNI-
CIPAL CODE BY D$LETING SECTION 10.32.060 SUBSECTION (d) PERTAINING TO FLEET
OPERATION PERMITS."
It was the consensus of Council to continue consideration of Ordinance No.
2859 to October 27, 1986.
Mayor Mandic adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach to 7:30 P.M., Monday, October 27, 1986 in the Council Chamber.
ATTEST:
•: �4yj�
City Clerk
City Clerk and es-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
4 9
Mayor
153