Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-11-12I 1 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1986 - 1:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange Phillips, Pierce MINUTES: UPON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND BY SMITH, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 1986, WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSTAIN: Strange REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-32 Applicant:: Darryl and Jolyn Hann A request: to permit a second story addition of approximately six hundred :seventy-five (675) Square Feet to an existing one story dwelling. Subject property is located at 16931 Edgewater Lane (West side of Edgewater Lane approximately one hundred eighty feet (1801) South of Davenport Drive). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported the request was for a second story addition to an existing residence. She also mentioned that there were no variances involved in the request but a Coastal Development Permit was required. Adjacent property owners were notified but Staff received no comments concerning the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the request with conditions. The Public Hearing was opened by Chairman Tom Poe. Darryl.Hann was present but had no questions or comments for the Board. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 2 UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND BY KRE.JCI, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-32 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS,'BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed single family residence conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 2. The Coastal Development Permit is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the R1 Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed single family residence can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 4. The proposed single family residence conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated October 8, 1986, shall be the approved layout. 2. All building spoils, such as'unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 3. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 4. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 5. Prier to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. 6: All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. -2- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 3 AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith, Strange NOES: None ABSENT: None Glen Godfrey arrived at the meeting at this point - 1:43 P.M. - and Michael Strange, who had been replacing Mr. Godfrey, left the meeting. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-66 William ff. Messer A request to permit a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling which encroaches two feet (21) into a five foot (51) side yard setback. Subject property is located at 16989 Edgewater Lane (West side of Edgewater Lane approximately nine hundred feet (900') South of Davenport Drive). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff explained this request was for an extensive second story addition to a single family residence which is also located in the Coastal Zone. However, this applicant had previously received approval of the proposed plan from the California Coastal Commission. The adjacent property owners were notified but Staff received no comments for or against the request. The unique shape of the lot could create a land -related hardship and the applicant is submitting revised building elevations. Daryl Smith asked that the condition relative to height be altered to state the maximum height should conform with present Code requirements. After questioning by Glen Godfrey, Staff said the first story presently encroached into the setback and the second story would only conform with that existing setback. Les Evans and Daryl Smith were concerned about the additional load on the existing storm drain lines and a lengthy discussion followed relative to the surcharge on this easement. The Public Hearing was opened and the applicant, William Messer, -was present. Mr. Messer stated he had proven, during the previous application review, that there would not be a surcharge on the existing storm drain and also that he had no problem with the building height restrictions. Mr. Messer indicated there might be some bearing walls removed in the interior of the residence and this instigated a discussion relative to this matter. Dennis Krejci called attention to the structural problems which could be created by such removal and also expressed concern over the additional weight the second story might create on the existing foundations. -3- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 4 After a discussion relative to these issues, Daryl Smith suggested a condition that these problems be resolved by having structural and engineering plans submitted for approval prior to issuance of building permits. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY SMITH AND SECOND1BY,EVANS, CONDITIONAL -EXCEPTION NO. 86-66 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING - VOTE: ' . i , , . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to.deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. 2. The.granting:of a Conditional Exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The granting of Conditional Fxception No. 86-66 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the.same zone classifications. 4. The granting -of the Conditional Exception will,not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF,APPROVAL: 1. The site plan and floor plans received and dated October 9, 1986, shall:be,the,approved layout. 2. Revised elevations shall:be;submitted depicting the modifications,described-herein:. a. Maximum height of the structure shall -comply -with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code for R-1 Zone. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide calculations to show -.that the surcharge on the existing storm drain will not exceed load capacity of the line. Said calculations shall be subject to review and approval of the Public Works Department. -4- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 5 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall submit structural and engineering plans for that portion of the building foundation along the building line. Plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Public Works Department and the Building Division of the Development Services Department. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 6. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. 9. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. AYES: Evans, Krejci, -Poe, Smith NOES: Godfrey ABSENT: None Glen Godfrey asked that the Minutes reflect his negative vote was consistent with his vote on the previous entitlement request inasmuch as the residence could easily be constructed in compliance with the present Codes since it was such a major renovation. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N0. 86-89 USE PERMIT NO. 86-81 Applicant.: Brian Yarema CE REQUEST: To locate common open space within five feet (5') of a wall containing a door or window in lieu of ten feet (101). UP REQUEST: To permit a five (5) unit apartment complex. Subject property is located at 5131 Dunbar Drive (North side of Dunbar Drive approximately one hundred seventy feet (1701) West of Leslie Lane). -5- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 6 This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff said this request for a five (5) unit apartment complex had been reviewed. The parking requirements have been met and each unit would have separate patio and yard areas. The Conditional Exception is required for the common area open space in the rear since the applicant only has twenty-f.ive,feet (25') between the building and property line. Staff also mentioned there had been discussions regarding a turnaround for this project; however, it has since been determined the distance from the property line -to the•guest parking space is one hundred forty-nine feet (1491). Staff recommended approval of both the Conditional Exception and Use Permit with conditions. Glen Godfrey asked about the General Plan land use designation. Staff said it was medium density residential which would allow this type of project. Daryl Smith suggested a condition be added requiring that stub outs for gas,'electric,'and water outlets be provided in the patio areas. He also•mentioned that the trash receptacle bight be moved to the front area of the project and surrounded with adequate landscaping'to hide it from view. Glen dodfrey broached_ the'subject of handicapped parking, after which Mr. Smith requested a condition that these problems of parking, trash'receptacle, etc., be worked' out to the satisfaction of Development -Services Department. A discussion followed concerning the block wall and fencing. Daryl Smith asked to have a condition added limiting the height of the block wall to forty-two inches (42") within the front setback area. Tom Poe reminded the Board that automatic sprinklers would be required on the project since the new Fire Code had now gone into effect. The Public Hearing was opened simult'arieously on both projects by Chairman Poe. The applicant, Brian Yarema, stated he had no problems with the landscaping, the striping, or with moving the trash receptacle. He asked what the setback would be in relation to the block wall and Staff informed him it would be fifteen feet (15'). There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. UPON MOTION BY POE AND SECOND BY SMITH, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-89 AND USE PERMIT NO. 86-81 WERE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -6- 11/12/86 - BZA �I Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 7 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-89: 1. Granting of reduction in open space minimum dimension will not reduce the required total open space area. Applicant will provide more total open space area than is required by Code. 2. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 86-89 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 3. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO :. :• 1. The floor plans and elevations received and dated October 22, 1986, shall be the approved layout. 2. A revised site plan shall be submitted indicating revisions expressly enumerated in Use Permit No. 86-81. 2. All Conditions of Approval of Use Permit No. 86-81 shall apply. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 86-81: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 86-81: 1. The floor plans and elevations received and dated October 22, 1986, shall be the approved layout. 2. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Each unit shall include a minimum ten foot by seven foot (10' x 71) concrete patio slab. -7- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 ,Page 8 b. Show relocation of trash enclosure to front of building to satisfaction of Development Services Department. c. Expand handicapped parking area to include a turnaround to satisfaction of the Fire Department and Development Services Department. d. Block wall shall be a maximum height of forty-two inches (42") within the front yard setback. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits,'the applicant shall submit the, following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development, Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan., Said plan.shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the,type_of,.material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. Installation:of.required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 5. The applicant shall submit proof of subdivision to satisfaction of the Department of Development;Services. 6. An automatic fire sprinkler system ;shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 8: Natural gas shall be stubbed in•at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 9. Natural gas, electric, and water outlets shall be provided on the patio area. 10. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots'and water faucets. 11. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - USE PERMIT NO. 86-81: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. -8- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 9 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. Landscaping shall comply with S. 912 and S. 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke Use Permit No. 86-81 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-48 (EXTENSION OF TIME) Applicant: Unocal Corporation A request fot an Extension of Time for previously approved Administrative Review No. 85-48 (to permit modernization of an existing service station). Subject property is located at 16471 Bolsa Chica Street (Northwest corner of Heil Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff said this project had previously been approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on December 4, 1985. The applicant is requesting an Extension of Time for a period of one (1) year and Staff would recommend approval with some modifications to the original Conditions of Approval - one of which would be to bring signs into conformance with the new Sign Code. Another modification would be to -replace the three foot (31) wide landscaping strip with six inch (6") concrete curbing along the property line. Staff then called attention of the Board to a memo from the Public Works Department concerning this second modification. There was a discourse between Daryl Smith and Les Evans regarding ,the original approval on this project and its effect on the adjacent shopping center. Les Evans suggested the condition regarding the landscaping strip and/or curbing should be deleted. Glen Godfrey noted the project could not be brought into conformance with the new Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which would require six feet (61) of.landscaping. He suggested the request be denied and have the applicant start the entitlement process all over by submittal of a new entitlement request to the Planning Commission including a request for variance from the new Code standards. Susan Pierce also mentioned other requirements under the Code for modernization of service stations. -9- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 10 The applicant's representative, Beatrice Best, was present. Daryl Smith suggested that she might request a continuance to allow time to discuss these suggested modifications with her company. Glen Godfrey said he would make a motion for denial of the project and Les Evans seconded it. At this point, Dennis Krejci stated he would like to ask the applicant's representative if she had a preference as to requesting a continuance or for denial of the extension of time which would allow them to go to the Planning Commission. Ms. Best then presented the Board with a copy of the Site Plan which had ultimately been submitted to Development Services showing revisions the Board had requested. A discussion ensued regarding the plan dated July 22, 1985, and the fact this plan included revisions dated January 23, 1986, and February 26, 1986, as the Board had required. Daryl Smith stated that was the conceptual plan -the Board had originally approved. Based on this additional information, Les Evans said he would withdraw his second. There was no other second to Mr. Godfrey's motion so the motion died for lack of a'second. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND -SECOND BY SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 85-48 (EXTENSION OF TIME) WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan dated July 22, 1985, and including revisions of January 23, 1986, and February 26, 1986, shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating all lots on°the subject property. Said map shall be recorded prior to'final inspection and a copy submitted to the Department of Development Services. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. _10- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 11 c. Provide minimum of five (5) fifteen (15) gallon trees along the West and North property line planters. 4. Wheel chair ramp shall be installed at the intersection per Public Works standards. 5. There shall be no sale of alcoholic beverages and vending machines shall be limited to no more than three (3) at the location. 6. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 7. Street lights shall be provided along Heil Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street per Public Works standards. 8. Dedication of thirty-two foot (321) corner radius is required per Public Works standards. 9. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 10. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 11. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 12. The applicant shall record an irrevocable offer to dedicate a reciprocal vehicular access easement for the benefit of the adjacent shopping center property, as indicated on the Site Plan for Site Plan Amendment No. 86-3 dated March 4, 1986, to become effective at the time the service station property redevelops. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The major identification sign shall be removed or altered to comply with Article 961 within ninety (90) days of November 19, 1986. 3. All signs shall be brought into compliance with Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All free-standing signs shall be low -profile, monument -type signs. -11- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 12 4. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. 5. The Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves .the right to revoke Administrative Review No. 85-48 (Extension of Time) if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. AYES: Evans, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: Godfrey ABSENT: None Ms. Best then requested clarification on the signage issue and the monument -type sign concept was explained to her by Mr. Godfrey. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-106 Applicant: Unocal Corporation A request to consolidate several lots into one (1) parcel and Waiver of Final Map. Subject property is -located at 16471 Bolsa Chica Street (Northwest corner of Heil Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff explained this request covered the same site as the previous Administrative Review the Board had just discussed. The Tentative Parcel Map had been a requirement of the original approval. This request had been tabled pending completion of all the requirements. Glen Godfrey stated a Waiver of the Parcel Map could not be granted and Les Evans corroborated Mr. Godfrey's statement. Mr. Evans stated Unocal would have to file a Final Map because of the number of lots :involved. The applicant's representative, Nick Peckovich, said he thought there were only two (2) lots involved. Mr. Evans stated City records indicated there were portions of six (6) lots in the parcel and, unless Mr. Peckovich could show proof otherwise, the Final Map would be required. Mr. Peckovich was aware of the Conditions of Approval and did not indicate any opposition. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 86-106 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -12- 11/12/86 - BZA 1 7 Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 13 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed consolidation of several parcels for purposes of commercial use in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for community business district allowing commercial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed consolidation are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None Mr. Evans asked that the Minutes reflect specifically that the Waiver of Final Map was not granted by this action. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-14 Applicant: Robert Contorelli A request to permit the addition of seven hundred thirty-five (735) Square Feet to a previously approved seven thousand, six hundred forty-five (7,645) Square Foot industrial building. Subject property is located at 17682-96 Metzler Lane (East side of Metzler Lane approximately eight hundred forty-four feet (8441) South of Slater Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff indicated the small addition being requested would increase the applicant's parking requirements from seventeen (17) to eighteen (18) spaces. The Board had previously approved the layout with a turnaround but this space would have to be used as a parking area. The Board has discussed moving the landscaping to the front area but this could create a problem since the parking space next to the wall -13- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 14 needs to be twelve feet (121) wide. This would cause a reduction in the overall landscaping. Staff does not feel this plan improves the design of the original project; therefore, Staff is recommending denial of the request. Daryl Smith commented that the original plan indicated there would only be six inches (6") of landscaping along the southerly wall which would not be covered by a car overhang, and he felt this new plan was a better arrangement. The applicant, Robert Contorelli, was present and said.this was a much cleaner layout than other buildings on the block. He further stated he had a site plan for the building next door to his which had less landscaping and asked why it was approved and his project was being recommended for denial. Les Evans reiterated that the applicant needed eighteen (18) parking spaces which he could not seem to provide. Glen Godfrey suggested the request might be continued to further research the situation. Mr. Contorelli said he could,go through the "legal stuff" but he did not want to do so because he needed an answer very quickly— at least by the next meeting. . , . Daryl Smith discussed with,the applicant various possibilities of supplying the proper landscaping and the.applicant mentioned trees which were planted on the adjacent lot.. Mr. Contorelli stated he could plant trees intermittently between the existing trees. Mr. Smith said a revised site plan would be required to show the landscaping, parking, and turnaround. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-14 WAS CONTINUED, WITH THE APPLICANT'S CONCURRENCE, TO THE REGULAR 14EETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 1986, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS AGENDA ITEMS: BOARD REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED USE PERMIT NO. 86-23 AND USE PERMIT NO. 86-24 Applicant: Corona Development Company A request to install single car doors in an apartment project in lieu of double doors for garages as previously approved. Subject property is located at 7891 and 7901 Holt Street. -14- 11/12/86 - BZA Minutes, H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments November 12, 1986 Page 15 John King was present to represent the applicant and he stated the double doors had been a requirement of the previous approval. Mr. King said the buildings were now under construction and that, even after structural plan checking, the loading on the beams did not seem to be correct. He further stated George Bendlin had said the beams were sagging when he made his inspection. Mr. King requested that the Board allow him to install single car doors in the garages instead of the required double doors. There was a discussion relative to fire requirements and Mr. King, stated fire sprinklers had been installed in the building. Dennis Krejci introduced the question of clearance for cars with the single doors and in the interior of the garages. Mr. King said they would have ample clearance but Glen Godfrey disagreed. Mr. King further stated the applicant would install automatic garage door openers to facilitate entry to the garages. Daryl Smith said the interiors of the garages should still remain open even though the single car doors were installed. Chairman Tom Poe stated the Board had voiced its approval of installation of single car doors in lieu of double doors provided the interiors of the double garages remained open. Daryl Smith added that a stipulation should be made that these changes be to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Divisions regarding structural and open area requirements. There was no further business to be presented to the Board for their review. UPON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY SMITH, THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1986, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans, Godfrey, Krejci, Poe, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments jh (6684d) -15- 11/12/86 - BZA