Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-07-01MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, JULY 1. 1987 - 1:30 P.M. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR PRESENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Dennis Krejci, Acting Zoning Administrator Laura Phillips Approval action on the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 24, 1987 were postponed to the July 8, 1987 meeting. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 87-41/USE PERMIT NO. 87-51 Applicant: John E. Schwartz The conditional exception request is to permit a 15-foot front yard setback in lieu of 50 feet and to permit approximately 300 square feet of building encroachment into the site angle setback. The use permit is a request to permit the addition of two (2) bays to an existing coin -operated car wash. The subject property is located at 5841 Warner Avenue (North side of Warner Avenue approximately 400 feet West of Springdale Avenue) This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the Board of Zoning Adjustments had previously approved the car wash for two wash bays. The current request was for two additional wash bay. The addition would block circulation from the front and rear of the site. Staff recommended denial with findings due to circulation problems and there being no land related hardship. The public hearing was opened and John Schwartz, the applicant, was present. He spoke in support of the request stating that circulation was already a problem because many times there is a line of vehicles waiting for the two existing wash bays. The additional bays would eliminate stacking. He indicated that his request was to develop his property similar to others in the area. He presented pictures of other buildings on Warner and Springdale which were built within 50 feet of the property line. Mr. Krejci advised the applicant that in the 1 1/2 years of serving on the Board, he did not recall any encroachments for buildings shown in the pictures. Ms. Phillips indicated that the setbacks vary along Warner. Mr. Evans Kitsigiamis, owner of the shopping center, spoke in opposition to the request. Visibility to the shopping center would be blocked by the additional bays. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Krejci reported that there are City Ordinance and State Laws require that findings relating to land related hardships are request to be made to grant a variance request and that the findings for the conditional exception do not exist. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-41 AND USE PERMIT NO. 87-51 WERE DENIED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-51: 1. The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent properties. 2. On -site circulation is inadequate and have the potential of creating a congestion and circulation hazard. 3. The proposed structure would prohibit thru circulation on the site. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-41: 1. Although the property is irregular in configuration, the size of the lot satisfies the minimum size of 10,000 square feet and exceeds the minimum frontage of one hundred (100) feet. 2. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-41 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 3. The subject property was legally subdivided and developed in a manner consistent with applicable zoning laws. 4. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. -2- 7/1/87 - OZA 5. Encroachment into the required setback is not compatible with setbacks established for properties in the vicinity would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-42 (Cont. from 6/24/87) Applicant: Seaspray Homeowners Association A request to permit a 12-foot high block wall in lieu of maximum permitted 8-foot high wall. Subject property is located at 21372 Brookhurst Street (East side of Brookhurst Street approximately 500 feet North of Hamilton Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request for the block wall was between Seaspray and commercial property. Staff had visited the site and recommended denial because there was no land related hardship. The public hearing was opened and Dennis Sunbird, representing Seaspray, was present. He spoke in support of the request stating that an 8-foot wall on Seaspray property would only be 5-foot on the Arco side. He was concerned that a 5-foot wall could be easily jumped. He said, eventually they might want to put a roof over this area to store maintenance equipment. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Krejci reported that City Code allows for a 6-foot high fence but there are special provisions on properties which abut commercial to be 8-foot high. He went on to say that an 8-foot high fence should solve the problem of vandals. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-42 WAS DENIED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. There is no exceptional grade differential or unusual circumstance requiring a 12' wall. -3- 7/1/87 - OZA 2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Conditional Exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. An 8' wall in compliance with code will serve the purpose for which the wall is intended. 3. The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent properties. Mr. Krejci reported that Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-283, Administrative Review No. 87-25, Negative Declaration No. 87-27 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-282 would be heard together due to the nature of the requests and the applicant on each being Pacific Coast Corporation. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-283 Applicant: Pacific Coast Corporation A request to create four (4) parcels for development purposes. The subject property is located at Metzler Lane just South of Belva Drive and adjacent to SPRR right-of-way. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 87-25/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 87-27 Applicant: Pacific Coast Corporation, A request to permit five (5) industrial buildings (for a total of 77,136 Square Feet). The Subject property is located at the Southeast corner of Gothard Street and Belva Drive. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 87-27. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-282 Applicant: Pacific Coast Corporation A request to create three (3) parcels for development purposes. The subject property is located on the East side of Gothard Street approximately 925 feet North of Talbert Avenue. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that there are five separate parcels on Metzler Lane to be used for industrial buildings. The buildings comply with the Ordinance Code except for minor variances which are addressed in the conditions of approval. Staff recommended approval with findings and conditions. -4- 7/1/87 - OZA Bill Pattapoff of the Public Works Department reported that from Slater to Metzler Lane, the walls have been built 15' from the center line of the railroad tracks. Public Works would require a caison type of footing for the retaining wall. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 87-25/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The floor plans and elevations received and dated June 2, 1987 shall be the approved layout. 2. The site plan received and dated June 2, 1987 shall be revised depicting the modifications described herein: a. Increase 21' wide aisle to 24' b. Increase 104 parking spaces to 105 c. Verify location of Railroad right-of-way, storm drain easement, and retaining wall, and correct if necessary. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map or parcel map waiver request to consolidate and create proposed lots as applicable. The parcel map or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy of the recorded map or plat filed with the Department of Community Development prior to final inspection or occupancy. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems' shall be completed prior to final inspection. 6. Install street improvements on Gothard, Belva and Metzler, per Public Works requirements. 7. Color pallette for buildings shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Department Staff. -5- 7/1/87 - OZA 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of,Public Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation. 9. On -site fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department. 10. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations.. 11. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 12. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. 13. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (2"). 15. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (27') in width and shall be of radius type construction. 17. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. 18. All building spoils, such as,unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle -them. 19. If foil type insulation us to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 20. Drainage pipes under westerly parcel shall be removed prior to issuance of building permits. 21. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters, and central heating units. 22. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 23. If lighting is included'in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 24. Prior to issuance of building permits, the subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s) for proposed reciprocal drives. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development prior to occupancy. -6- 7/1/87 - OZA 25. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-282 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-282: 1. The proposed subdivision of three (3) parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation allowing industrial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on June 11, 1987, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Gothard, Belva and Metzler shall be dedicated to City standards. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). -7- 7/1/87 - OZA 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 8. Drainage pipes shall be removed prior to issuance of building permits. . 9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 10. All vehicular access rights along Gothard, Belva and Metzler shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Zoning Administrator. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-283 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed subdivision of four (4) parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation allowing industrial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on June 30, 1987, shall be the approved layout (with corrections to sewer line/storm line to Public Works satisfaction). -8- 7/1/87 - OZA 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Location of Railroad right-of-way, storm drain easement and property line shall be verified prior to recordation to Public Works satisfaction, and corrected on the map if necessary. 4. Location and design of retaining wall shall be to the satisfaction of Public Works Department. 5. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 6. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 7. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 8. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 10. All vehicular access rights along Metzler Lane shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Zoning Administrator. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 87-43/ USE PERMIT NO, 87-54: Applicant: Jack E. Briggs Conditional Exception No. 87-43 is a request to permit a five foot (5') exterior side yard setback in lieu of a ten foot (10') side yard setback. Use Permit No. 87-54 is a request to permit an addition to a lot with an existing nonconforming side yard. Subject property is located at 602 Eighth Street (Northeast corner of Eighth Street and Acacia Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the applicant had submitted a letter requesting continuance to next regular meeting. The public hearing was opened. There was no one present to speak for or against the project. Since the meeting was being continued, the public hearing was left open. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-43 AND USE PERMIT NO. 87-54 WERE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JULY 8, 1987 BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. -9- 7/1/87 - OZA USE PERMIT NO. 87-53 Applicant:' Loehmann's Five Points Plaza A request to permit a sidewalk sale at a shopping center and to permit a hot dog and drink stand from 10:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.,,July 11, 1987. Subject property is located at 18593 Main Street (Northeast corner of Main Street and Delaware Street). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 4, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips,,_reported that the request is for a one day sidewalk sale., The only structures in the parking lot would be for the hot dog and drink stand. Staff recommendation was for approval of the event. USE PERMIT NO. 87-53 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS'AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of'the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements''in the'vicinity of such use or building., 2. The granting'of the Use Permit No. 87-53 will'not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The`pioposal'is consistent with'the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, received and dated June 16, 1987 shall be the approved layout. 2. Applicant shall provide'for cleanup of the area:'after closing of the event. 3. Obtain all necessary Health Department permits for food service. 4. Fire access lanes shall'be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. -10- 7/1/87 - QZA 5. The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, Administrative Services Department, and/or shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement to be executed at least five (5) days prior to the event. 6. Minimum 44" wide sidewalk area shall remain clear. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1: The use shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. A Certificate to Operate shall be issued by the Department of Community Development as required by Section 9730.80 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-151 (WAIVER) Applicant: V. R. Bonfanti, Architect A request to permit Waiver of Final Parcel Map. The subject property is located at 19131-19171 Beach Boulevard (West side of Beach Boulevard approximately 300 feet North of Clay Avenue). Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the Parcel Map was approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments in March, 1987 and the applicant has requested a waiver of the final map. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. TENTAIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-151 (WAIVER) WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on March 12, 1987, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk's office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property. -11- 7/1/87 - OZA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 87-214 Applicant: Dewayne Brown Development A request to create two (2) parcels for development purposes.The subject property is located at 7462 Talbert Avenue (South side of Talbert, Avenue approximately 365 feet East'of Gothard'Street)., Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that this is a follow up to a condition of approval for the Administrative Review for these buildings. Staff recommended approval with findings and conditions. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 198'6. TENTAIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-214 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING - ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. ,The proposed subdivision of two (2) parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the,land use designation allowing commercial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed consolidation are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision, Ordinance.' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on June 11, 1987, shall be,the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map -shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). -12- 7/1/87 - OZA 1 5. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 6. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 7. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 8. All vehicular access rights along Talbert shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Zoning Administrator. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-273 Applicant: California Standards Association A request to create two (2) lots for development purposes. The subject property is located at 507 Eleventh Street (West side of Eleventh Street approximately 50 feet North of Pecan Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 15, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is to divide one - 50 foot parcel into two - 25 foot parcels. Staff recommended approval with findings and conditions. TENTAIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-273 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed creation of two (2) parcels for purposes of industrial (commercial) use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation allowing commercial buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. -13- 7/1/87 - OZA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on June 15, 1987, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Alley shall be dedicated and improved to City standards. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 8. A copy -of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 9. All vehicular access rights along llth Street shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Zoning Administrator. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO THE STUDY SESSION ON JULY 6, 1987, 10:00 AM BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 1 A O!d 2- Dennis Krec " Acting Zoning Administrator :jr (8616d) -14- 7/1/87 - OZA MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, JULY 8. 1987 - 1:30 P.M. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR PRESENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Strange, Acting Zoning Administrator Laura Phillips MINUTES: THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 17, 1987 MEETING WERE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-43/USE PERMIT NO. 87-54 continued from July 1, 1987 Applicant: Jack E. Briggs The conditional exception request is to permit a five foot (5') exterior side yard setback in lieu of a ten foot (10') side yard setback. The use permit request is to permit an addition to a lot" with an existing nonconforming side yard. The subject property is located at 602 Eighth Street (Northeast corner of Eighth Street and Acacia Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is for an addition to a single family home. There was no land related hardship and staff recommended denial. The public hearing was opened and Jack Briggs, the applicant, spoke in support of the request. He said prior to May, 1987 the zoning code allowed a 5 foot side yard setback and plans were drawn on that basis. Houses in the area have a 5 foot side yard setback. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. Acting Zoning Administration, Mike Strange, advised the applicant that staff is preparing a code amendment that would allow the 5 foot side yard setback. There is no guarantee that it will be approved and, if approved, it would be a minimum of two months before it would be effective. He said state law dictates there must be a land related hardship to grant a variance and there is no land related hardship. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-43 AND USE PERMIT NO. 87-54 WERE DENIED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 87-43: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. This is a standard size and shape lot with no unusual topographic features. 2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Conditional Exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-43 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 4. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-54: 1. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Use Permit is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 2. The use -as proposed by the applicant is not feasible without granting of the concurrent Conditional Exception. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 87-40/USE PERMIT 87-50 Applicant: Jack Frank The conditional exception request is to permit a 3 feet rear yard setback in lieu of a 10 feet rear yard setback for a new unit. The use permit request is to permit an additional unit on a lot with an existing non -conforming side yard. The subject property is located 1841 Lake Street (West side of Lake Street approximately 50 feet south of Utica Avenue). -2- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is to add a new garage and apartment unit to an existing single family home. Staff had received two letters in opposition to the request dated July 7, 1987. Staff recommended denial as there was no land related hardship and the garage and apartment could be built with the code requirements. The public hearing was opened and Jack Frank, the applicant spoke in support of the request. The architect, Gerald Gimbell, agreed that the garage and apartment unit could be built within code requirements but their desire was to set apart the apartment from the front house. Chris Taylor spoke in opposition to the request. He was concerned that the tenants would park in the 3 foot apron which would cause difficulties in the alley. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-40 WAS DENIED AND USE PERMIT 87-50 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-40: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. This is a standard retangular 50 x 115 lot with no unusual topography. 2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Conditional Exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-40 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 4. The subject property was legally subdivided and developed in a manner consistent with applicable zoning laws. 5. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL USE PERMIT NO, 87-50: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: -3- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The floor plans dated 5-26-87 and 6-19-87 and elevations received and dated 5-26-87 shall be the approved layout. 2. The site plan received and dated 5-26-87 shall be modified depicting the modifications described herein: a. Provide minimum 10' rear yard setback for dwelling unit. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map or parcel map waiver request to legalize the existing parcel. The parcel map or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy of the recorded map or plat filed with the Department of Community Development prior to final inspection or occupancy or provide proof of legal creation.. 4. Prior to.issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 5. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 7.. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 8. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. -4- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 1 9. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. Landscaping shall comply with Article 912 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-45/USE PERMIT NO. 87-58 Applicant: Angelo Rinaldi The conditional exception request is to permit 64% site coverage in lieu of 50% site coverage. The use permit request is to permit addition to a structure with non -conforming setbacks. The property is located at 219 Second Street (West side of Second approximately 100 feet South of Olive Avenue. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is to add a second story deck. There is no land related hardship and staff recommended denial. The public hearing was opened and Angelo Rinaldi spoke in support of the request. He said he had built similar homes in 1982 in the same vicinity and did not have a problem. There was no one else other person to speak for or against the requests and the public hearing was closed. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-45 AND USE PERMIT NO. 87-58 WERE DENIED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-45: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. -5- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Conditional Exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The site has an existing sundeck and open area on the ground. 3. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-45 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. 4. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL USE PERMIT 87-58: 1. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Use Permit is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The site has an existing sundeck and open area on the ground. 2. Encroachment into the required maximum site coverage is not compatible with setbacks established for properties in the vicinity and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N0, 87-46/USE PERMIT NO, 87-44 Applicant: Zaher Khalaf The conditional exception is a request to permit the addition of two units to a triplex with non -conforming front and rear yards, including a 25% density bonus (for a total of five units). The use permit is a request to (1) permit a balcony to encroach 3 feet into the front rear yard setback, (2) permit a 6 foot side yard setback in lieu of a 10 foot side yard setback, (3) permit 778 sq. ft. of open space in lieu of 1962 sq. ft. (4) permit 10 building separation in lieu of 15 foot, (5) permit backing of cars onto a public street from a multi -unit dwelling, (6) permit a 10 foot wide parking stall adjacent to a wall in lieu of 12 foot wide. The subject property is located on the East side of Algonquin Street approximately 300 feet South of Heil Avenue. This request is coveredddby Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that two units to an existing triplex for a total lot. Staff recommended denial because there hardship or unusual circumstances. the request was to add of five units on the was no land related 1 -6- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 The public hearing was opened and Zaher Khalaf, the applicant, spoke in support of the requests. He said the variance requests were to make the new structures merge with the existing structures. The architect, Brian Husting, spoke in support of the requests. He said the property was only 30 feet wide which necessitated the variance requests. He requested approval with mitigation measures. Acting Zoning Administrator, Mike Strange, reported that he had visited the site and the new units would eliminate the private open space. Mr. Husting responded that some of the private open space had to be eliminated to accommodate additional parking. He went on to say that the development to the east of the property had no open space or guest parking. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. Mr. Strange said he had major concerns with automobiles backing onto Algonquin Street and would prefer a side entry driveway into the garage or enter from the southerly side. THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATION REFERRED CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-46 AND USE PERMIT NO. 87-44 TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS THE COMMISSION IS THE APPROPRIATE BODY TO HEAR CASES INVOLVING DENSITY BONUS REQUESTS. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-51 Applicant: Blue Ribbon Builders, Inc. A request to permit a portion of a room addition to encroach 3 feet into the required 10 feet rear yard setback. The property is located at 8752 Anthony Drive (South side of Anthony Drive at intersection with Roque Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is to add a family room to an existing single family residence. Staff recommended approval because the rear of the property abuts a flood control channel and only 3 feet of the addition will encroach into the rear yard setback. The public hearing was opened and Bob Mirabella spoke in support of the request. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-51 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: -7- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N0, 87-51: 1. Granting of reduction in minimum setback will not reduce the required total open space area (900 Square Feet). 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or-, surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. The lot is irregular in shape and abuts a flood control channel and Warner Avenue.- - 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-51 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 4. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and -elevations received and dated 6-12-87 shall be the approved layout. 2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire,•.pipe, and other surplus or unusable material,:shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 3. Proposed structures shall be.architecturally compatible with existing structures. 4. Prior to issuance of -building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a Letter of Agreement" assuring that,the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE-REOUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. �I L -8- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 87-54/USE PERMIT NO. 87-38/NEGATIVE DECLARATION N0, 87-22 Applicant: Leonard Lindborg The conditional exception request was to permit one parking space to be 17'8" long in lieu of 19' long. The use permit request was to permit a ten unit apartment complex. The property is located at 906 - 912 Florida Street (East side of Florida Street approximately 110' North of Indianapolis). This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 87-22. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the property is zoned R3 but is surrounded by single family homes. Staff recommended approval of the use permit but denial of the conditional exception because the plans could be modified for the parking space. She submitted a letter for the record signed by a number of residents in opposition to the request. The public hearing was opened and Leonard Lindborg spoke in support of the request. The architect, Caz Bakovich, spoke in support of the request. Jack Weidy, 1007 Florida, spoke in opposition to the request. He said parking is already a serious problem in the area because in the past the City allowed 8 units with only 4 garages. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. Acting Zoning Administrator, Mike Strange, said he would prefer the plans to be changed to narrow the driveway and meet the parking requirements. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION WAS DENIED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: 1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. 2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a Conditional Exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-54 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. -9- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 4. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 87-22 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH MITIGATION MEASURES. USE PERMIT NO. 87-38 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH CONDITIONS: SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 30, 1987 shall be the approved layout with the following modification:. a. Provide a standard size parking stall in lieu of the compact space (reduce width of driveway accordingly. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map or parcel map waiver request to consolidate the two lots. The parcel map or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy of the recorded map or plat filed with the Department of Community Development prior to final inspection or occupancy or provide proof of legal creation.. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 4. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 5. Lock key boxes to be installed at points of entry for emergency access. 6. Fire extinguishers to be installed pursuant to Fire Department Standards. 7. Building and unit address numbers to comply with Fire Department standards. Building Numbers to be minimum 10", Unit Numbers to be minimum 4". 8. If foil type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 9. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 77 1 -10- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 10. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 11. Existing mature trees on site shall be retained and incorporated into the site plan if feasible. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio with 36" box trees which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. 12. Dedicate 2 1/2' for alley per Public Works requirements. 13. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers. 14. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 15. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 16. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 17. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 4. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. -11- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 5. Landscaping shall comply with Article 912 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 6. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke this Use Permit if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. USE PERMIT NO 87-37/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 87-25 Applicant: Tom H. Rasmussen A request to permit display and storage of autos. The property is_ located at 19160 Beach Blvd. (East side of Beach Blvd. approximately 830 feet South of Garfield Avenue). This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 87-25. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is to display and store automobiles adjacent to the Bill Maxey Toyota lot. Staff recommended approval with conditions. The public hearing was opened: Tom Rasmussen, the applicant, spoke in favor of the request and agreed to the conditions of approval. Betty Skattum, 8102 Wadebridge, spoke in opposition to the request. She was upset because there are 30 to 40 light poles on the existing dealership which shine onto her property. The additional lot would make a bad situation worse. Russell Skattum, 8102 Wadebridge, spoke in opposition to the request. He was concerned about the noise from the loud speakers on the existing lot. Marsha Cook, 8165 Dartmore, spoke in opposition to the request. She indicated that her property was not that close to the dealership and the noise from the loud speakers could be heard at her residence. Mrs. Briggs, 8112 Dartmore, spoke in opposition to the request. She said the noise from the loud speakers is continual from 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Mrs. E. Brinker, 8122 Wadebridge, spoke in opposition to the request. She said the lights are a problem and also can hear the telephone ringing at all hours of the day and night. Sue Vaughn, 8102 Dartmore, spoke in opposition to the request. She was concerned that she could hear the telephone ringing and has called the police after the phone ringing for 20 minutes on a Sunday evening when the dealership was closed. Deborah Huffman, 8102 Dartmore, spoke in opposition to the request. She also was upset over the telephones and lights. -12- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 David Godman, Attorney representing Bill Maxey, spoke in support of the request. He suggested that mitigation measures could be implemented and would meet with the neighbors to work out problems at the existing dealership. He said the new lot would not have any speakers. The property would be used to store new and used vehicles and for employee/customer parking. Jerry Bame, Attorney representing the owner of the adjacent apartments, spoke in opposition to the request. He said the problems mentioned by the home owners in the back of the dealership would be worse for the tenants in the adjacent apartments. He felt the lot was an unreasonable encroachment and requested denial. If approved, he requested a block wall fence to separate the properties and also requested sidewalk and street improvements be completed in front of the apartments. Karen Atwell, 8112 Wadebridge, spoke in support of the request. Her property is directly behind the vacant lot. She said her block wall had been hit twice by the tenants from the adjacent property racing VW's around on the lot. The tenants also use the property for rock concerts. Any improvement to the property would be better than the current use. Jerry Bame pointed out that the address on the legal notification was not correct. It was the address for the existing Bill Maxey Dealership not the vacant lot. Mike Strange checked the records and reported that the notification was sent to the appropriate properties even though the address•was not correct. Tom Rasmussen, applicant, said he would adjust the lights and guaranteed that the loud speakers would be turned down. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. Mike Strange reported that he would be approving the use permit and negative declaration but would be adding conditions of approval to meet the concerns voiced at the public hearing. USE PERMIT NO. 87-37 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 87-25 WERE APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. -13- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 2. The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: " 1. The site plan received and dated June 22, 1987 shall be the approved layout with the following modification. a. Provide 15' wide landscape buffer along rear property line of subject property and existing site to -the south. 2. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works -for -review and approval. 3. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 4. A six foot high slatted chain link fence shall be installed on the northerly property line. 5. No outside speakers shall be permitted on this parcel. 6. No service/repair work shall be permitted on this parcel. 7. Existing outside speaker system shall be modified to be similar to the Honda dealer's system (quiet). 8. Provide street improvements to satisfaction of Public Works Department. 9. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 10. There shall be no loading or unloading of cars prior to 8:00 AM or after 9:00 PM. 11. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. Light standards shall be a maximum 14' high. Light standards along rear of adjacent southerly property shall also be maximum 14' high. -14- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 12. Prior to issuance of permits, the subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s) between the subject site and adjacent northerly property. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development prior to occupancy. 13. All applicable Public Works fees shall be,paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 3. Landscaping shall comply with Article 922 and 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke this Use Permit if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 87-19 Applicant: William Hall A request a 750 square foot addition to a second story of an existing two story single family residence. The property is located at 16322 Sundancer lane (East side of Sundancer Lane approximately 20 feet North of Aquarius Drive). The Coastal Status is appealable to the Coastal Commission. This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request is for an addition to the second story over the garage of an existing two story single family residence. The request complies with the Ordinance Code and staff recommended approval. The public hearing was opened and the architect, Frank Mirjahanger, spoke in support of the request. He said the plans had been approved by the Trinidad Architectural Review Board on June 15, 1987. Mark Dority, who lives on Ragtime, spoke in opposition to the request. He said in the past the City had granted variances for this property. -15- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 Ms. Phillips responded that the garage was built within code requirements and that only the eaves extend but are not included into the setback requirements. Mr. Strange responded that he believed there was a variance approved for the entire tract of 20'. Mrs. Dority spoke in opposition to the request. She said the second floor addition would shade the solar panels on her home and would be an invasion of their privacy. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the public hearing was closed. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 87-19 WAS CONTINUED TO JULY 15, 1987 BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO ALLOW STAFF TIME TO CONFER WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING THE SOLAR PANELS. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 87-12 Applicant: Dean Fronk A request to amend a previously approved site plan, to permit additions to several buildings within the McDonnel Douglas complex for a total of 22,274 square feet. The property is located at 5301 Bolsa Avenue (North east corner of Bolsa Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street - McDonnel Douglas. This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 87-6. Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that the request was advertised for the addition -and no comments had been received. Staff recommended approval with conditions. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 87-12 WAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The revision results in an improved development. 2. The revision complies with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3. The use of the property will remain the same. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan received and dated June 3, 1987 shall be the approved layout. 2. All previous conditions of Administrative Review No. 87-8 shall remain in effect (attached). -16- OZA Minutes 7/8/87 THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO THE JULY 13, 1987 STUDY SESSION AT 10:00 AM BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. Mike Strange Acting Zoning Administrator :jr (8677d) 1 -17- OZA Minutes 7/8/87