Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-07-15MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1987 - 1:30 P.M. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR PRESENT: Michael Strange, Acting Administrator STAFF MEMBER PRESENT: Laura Phillips MINUTES: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 24, 1987, WERE APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, AS TRANSCRIBED. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 87-19 Applicant: William M. Hall A request to permit a seven hundred fifty (750) Square Foot addition to the second story of an existing two (2) story single family residence. Subject property is located at 16322 Sundancer Lane (East side of Sundancer Lane approximately twenty feet (20') North of Aquarius Drive). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. The Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported this request had been continued from the previous week to allow an opportunity to check the actual location. This is a request to construct an addition to a single family, two (2) story residence and no variances are required. At last week's meeting, the property owner to the North of this property expressed concern over the project because it would create a lack of privacy and would block sunlight to his solar panels. The City Attorney's office has indicated the City does not have any regulations concerning shadows and the concerned property owner would need to obtain a private easement from the applicant. Staff recommended approval with conditions. The Public Hearing was opened by Michael Strange, Acting Zoning Administrator, and the applicant, William M. Hall, was present. Mr. Hall stated he had taken photographs showing that the Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 2 applicant's proposed construction would not be blocking the solar panels of the northerly property owner. Mr. Strange asked that the photographs be placed in the file for future reference and the applicant so agreed. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Strange reiterated Staff's comments about loss of privacy to the northerly neighbor and blockage of his solar panels. He added that Art Folger of the City Attorney's office had verified Staff's comments regarding State regulations. Mr. Strange also said it was his understanding most residences in the area were two (2) story units so the construction would only give the applicant parity with other property owners. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 87-19 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed single family residence conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 2. The Coastal Development Permit is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the R1 Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3. At the time of occupancy, the proposed single family residence can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General Plan. 4. The proposed single family residence conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 15, 1987, shall be the approved layout. 2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 3. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. I -2- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 3 4. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-52 Applicant: Clarence W. and Donalie J. Hunt A request to permit a five foot (51) exterior side yard setback in lieu of the required ten foot (10') setback. Subject property is located at 302 Twenty-first Street (Northeast corner of Olive Avenue and Twenty-first Street). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Ms. Phillips explained the applicant was requesting permission to construct two (2) units - an owner's unit on the lower floor and a second story unit. Previously the Code had required only a five foot (5') setback for units in the Town Lot section; however, the Code was changed in May of this year to require ten feet (10'). Staff members are currently working on Code changes which would require only five feet (5') for smaller lots such as this. A request similar to this one was denied last week, and Staff is recommending denial of this request because there is no land -related hardship. The Zoning Administrator could possibly condition the item pending the Ordinance change which would allow the setbacks again at five feet (5'). The Public Hearing was opened and Donalie J. Hunt, one of the applicants, was present. Ms. Hunt differed with Staff's interpretation that there was no land -related hardship and explained their Architect had been familiar with City Codes at the time the plans were drawn - when the five foot (5') restriction had been in effect. She added the plans had been submitted for plan check on May 7, 1987, but the Code change had become effective the previous day. Ms. Hunt explained they were retired, had difficulty obtaining a loan at their age, and were living in a mobile home until their residence could be constructed. -3- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 4 Cass Begovich, Architect for the project, reiterated Ms. Hunt's statements that he had checked the Code for restrictions prior to starting working drawings in March, and he was astounded that the Code had been changed when his client submitted the plans. Bob Corona inquired as to how long the proposed Code change for reverting back to the five foot (5') restriction would probably take. Mr. Strange explained the proposal would have to be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to becoming effective, and this process would possibly take a minimum of two (2) months after completion of the draft by Staff members. Clarence W. Hunt, the other applicant, stated their lot would be.the only one in the area with a ten foot (101) setback. All of -the other parcels on the street had existing structures built under the old Code. Mr. Hunt requested approval based on the assumption the Code change would become effective. Michael Strange explained he could not assume that the Planning Commission and City Council would automatically approve the proposed Code.change, and he further explained the requirement for a land -related hardship. Mr. Strange suggested the applicant might wish to request a one -week continuance for further research into the matter. Mr. Hunt mentioned he and Ms. Hunt had recently met with Michael Adams and Mr. Adams had suggested they go on with their grading plans; however, they should put their other plans on hold until his meeting with Staff members. Mr. Strange asked if Staff members were aware of their plans for building when they submitted the request for consolidation of the lots, and Ms. Hunt stated they were. Mr. Strange held a discussion with the Architect relative to setbacks, cutoffs, and the corner radius. After further discussion, Clarence W. Hunt, requested a one -week continuance. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project and the Public Hearing was left open to the regular meeting of July,22, 1987. Mr. Strange further explained that the continuance did not guarantee that an amicable solution would be reached to the problem but it would give additional time for researching the project. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-52 WAS CONTINUED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 22, 1987, WITH THE APPLICANT'S CONCURRENCE. -4- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 5 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-53 Applicant: Jim Salum A request to permit an eight foot (8') front yard setback for a courtyard fence in lieu of a fifteen foot (15') front yard setback. Subject property is located at 9421 Neolani Drive (North side of Neolani Drive approximately three hundred ten feet (310') East of Lehua Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff said this was a request to legalize an existing structure - a courtyard fence which encroaches into the front yard setback requirements. The structure is set back at eight feet (8') and the Code requires fifteen feet (151). The lot in question is a standard sized lot (60' x 100') located in a tract. Staff added no unusual circumstances exist and recommended denial of the request. The Public Hearing was opened by the Acting Zoning Administrator and Jim Salum, the applicant, was present. Mr. Salum explained his property had been a model home and was built to a higher elevation than surrounding lots - from sixteen inches (16") on the East to two feet (2') on the West. He explained he had built a retaining wall to keep water from flowing onto neighbor's lots. Then, since lights from cars on Zamora Drive flooded his front bedroom and cars had knocked down City trees in front of his house, he had decided to construct the fence in the front for privacy and safety factors. Ms. Nanette Salum presented photographs of the property, fences, and location of their driveway. Mr. Strange asked if the fence was built directly on the easterly property line and Mr. Salum replied it was built entirely on his property. Ms. Salum mentioned other residences in adjacent areas with fences ten feet (10') high and built out to the sidewalk. Mr. Strange explained those were the Deane Homes and had been built with approval of the City Council back in the early 1960's. There was a lengthy discussion between Mr. Strange, Mr. Salum and Ms. Salum regarding the existing neighborhood situation, height of the fence, etc. Mr. Strange explained he had visited the area and was concerned about the viewing range of cars exiting the Salums' garage and driveway and the danger it might create for children playing in the area. He added he would like to have an opinion from the City Traffic Division regarding this possible safety problem. Mr. Strange asked Mr./Salum if he had obtained a building permit for construction of the fence and Mr. Salum stated he had not done so. Mr. Strange explained that, if he approved the request, it would be necessary to obtain a building permit for the structure. -5- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 6 There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the request so the Public Hearing was closed. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-53 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Granting of reduction in minimum setback will not reduce the required total open space area (900 Square Feet). 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. The lot is located facing an intersection, where lights shine in the front windows, and oncoming cars present a safety hazard. The wall will act as a light -and safety barrier. 3. The granting of a Conditional Exception is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 4. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-55 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications. 5. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 6. The grade in rear of the lot is raised above that of adjacent properties, reducing privacy in the rear yard. "Therefore, the front court yard may be appropriately used for private open space. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations`received and dated June 26, 1987, shall be the approved layout. 2. Obtain necessary building permits for the walls from the Department of Community Development. 3. Provide -ten foot'(10') corner cut-off adjacent to'driveway and public sidewalk for safety reasons as required by the City Traffic Engineer. -6- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 7 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 5. A building permit for the fence/wall shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development within ninety (90) days of the date of approval or the application becomes null and void. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and. Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. USE PERMIT NO. 87-48 Applicant: Emil I. Ratsiu A request to permit a five (5) unit apartment complex. Subject property is located at 5151 Dunbar Drive (North side of Dunbar Drive approximately ninety feet (90') West of Leslie Lane). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff stated this request was for construction of a five (5) unit apartment complex on Dunbar Drive. The applicant is providing three (3) two -bedroom units and two (2) four -bedroom units. There are no variances requested and the plan complies with parking, setbacks, lot coverage, etc. The applicant will need to provide proof of legal creation of the parcel or file a Tentative Parcel Map. Staff recommended approval of the project with conditions that the project remain as five (5) dwelling units only, Second Floor doorways to the outside be closed, trash enclosure areas be shown on the drawings, and dedications to the satisfaction of Public Works. The Public Hearing was opened and Emil I. Ratsiu, the applicant, was present. Mr. Ratsiu held a discussion with Mr. Strange relative to legal creation of the lot and Mr. Strange said a copy of the legal documents would be required for the files. Mr. Ratsiu stated he did not understand the stipulations regarding the Second Floor doorways being closed. Ms. Phillips explained the Fire Department required doors to the outside from the Third Floor but not from the Second Floor. She added an explanation regarding problems which had existed all over the City regarding conversions to additional units in complexes and elimination of Second Floor doorways leading to the outside premises was one method of combating this problem. Mr. Strange asked the size of the units and Staff -7- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 8 pointed out the four (4) bedroom, three (3) bath units contained approximately 2,567 Square Feet of living space in each unit. Mr. Ratsiu objected to the closure of the doorways because he had placed the doors there for convenience. There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Strange explained to the applicant he was approving the request with conditions, including closure of the Second Floor outside doorways, and Mr. Ratsiu had ten (10) days within which to appeal the project to the Planning Commission if he so desired. USE PERMIT NO. 87-48 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of Use Permit No. 87-48 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 9, 1987, shall be the approved layout, with the following modifications: a. Eliminate doors to outside in Second Floor bedrooms b. Show trash enclosure 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map or parcel map waiver request to legalize the existing parcel. The parcel map or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy of the recorded map or plat filed with the Department of Community Development prior to final inspection or occupancy or provide proof of legal creation of the lot. -8- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 9 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. 6. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 7. Provide dedication and improvements on Dunbar Street as required by the Public Works Department. 8. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 9. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 10. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 11. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 12. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the development will be maintained as five (5) dwelling units. 14. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. -9- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 10 3. Landscaping shall comply with Article 912 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Use Permit No. 87-48 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. USE PERMIT NO. 87-55 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-294 Applicant: Mr. and Mrs James R. Waller, Jr. UP REQUEST: To permit an addition to a single family dwelling with existing nonconforming setbacks. TPM REOUEST: To consolidate two (2) lots and a portion of a third lot into one (1) lot for development purposes. Subject property is located at 712 Twelfth Street (East side of Twelfth Street approximately one hundred feet (100') North of. Palm Avenue). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. According to Staff, this request is to enlarge an existing single family residence and garage. The property abuts an alley along the side and rear of the property. The dedication will result in the setback being three and one-half feet (3-1/2') instead of the required five feet (5'). The applicant wants to maintain three feet (3') on the side to match the existing nonconforming setbacks and this would require a Use Permit. The City Engineer had indicated that proof of creation of this lot would be required before building permits were issued and the Tentative Parcel Map is required to consolidate the lots. The height of the elevations shall be reduced by one foot (1') to comply with Code, and some type of connection will be required between the garage and residence. Alley dedications shall also be provided to satisfaction of Public Works. Staff recommended approval with conditions. The Public Hearing was opened and James R. Waller, Jr., the applicant, was present. Mr. Waller stated his wife, Betty, and their Architect, Jim Corcoran, were also present. Mr. Waller added that Staff had stated the situation correctly and agreed to lowering the elevation of the building and connecting the residence and garage. Mr. Waller mentioned a Supreme Court discussion about taking private property without compensation. He added he would like the record to reflect that any rights he and his wife might have under this decision with regard to those issues not be waived. Mr. Waller said they intended to stay in Huntington Beach and wanted to comply with the rules and regulations. -10- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 11 There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the Public Hearing. Mr. Strange discussed the setback situation and reiterated the fact the applicants were building along the same setbacks as the building which previously existed there. He added that, in his opinion, the applicant was demolishing the existing garage and rebuilding it. The Architect, Jim Corcoran, said the applicant was maintaining the same footings and added it was basically remodeling and not a new structure. He said the reason they were setting back five feet (5') from the rear alley was because they would be entering the garages from the alley. Mr. Strange asked how much of the wall the applicant would be retaining and the Architect said approximately twenty-five feet (25'). He added there would be an eight foot (8') plate line on the garage. The Acting Zoning Administrator said he would approve the project with the understanding that the wall would remain in its present configuration. He further requested that the record reflect the project was not a total "tear down" - just that the garage is being added onto and the Southwest wall will be retained. Mr. Strange again mentioned that proof of legality of the lots would have to be presented prior to issuance of building permits. He added that Lot 10 was subdivided almost in half and the adjacent property owner might have to sign the parcel map if it had not been properly recorded prior to 1946. The Architect said it had been done prior to that time. USE PERMIT NO. 87-55 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-294 WERE APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO, 87-55: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of Use Permit No. 87-55 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. -11- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 12 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO 87-55: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 24, 1987, shall be the approved layout, with the following modifications: a. Maximum building height shall comply with R-1 standards b. Provide building connection between house and garage 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall file a parcel map or parcel map waiver request to consolidate Lots 14, 12, and a portion of Lot 10 of Huntington Beach Tract, Block 711. The parcel map'or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy of the recorded map or plat filed with the Department of Community Development prior to final inspection or occupancy. Provide date of lot creation prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Provide alley dedications and any improvements as required by the Public Works Department. 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 5. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 6. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters and central heating units. 7. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall sign, notarize, and record with the County Recorder a "Letter of Agreement" assuring that the single family residence will be maintained as one (1) dwelling unit. 9. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - USE PERMIT NO. 87-55: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. -12- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 13 2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal -Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-294: 1. The proposed consolidation of two (2) parcels and a portion of a third lot for purposes of residential use in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for community residential district allowing residential buildings was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed consolidation are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL_— TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-294: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR ANY PURPOSE: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on June 24, 1987, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon). 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. The alleys shall be dedicated to City standards. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s). 6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed. -13- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 14 7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. 8. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development: 9. All vehicular access -rights along Twelfth Street shall be - dedicated to the'City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Zoning Administrator. USE PERMIT NO. 87-62 Applicant: Country Cottage Antiques A request to permit a two (2) day sale in the parking lot of a shopping center on July 18 and 19, 1987. Subject property is located at 6885 Warner Avenue (Northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Golden West Street). This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 4, California Environmental Quality Act, 1986. Staff reported this request was for a two (2) day sale in a shopping center parking lot and the same type of sale had been approved previously. •Staff recommended approval with'standard conditions such as cleaning up after the sale, maintaining fire lanes, and obtaining a Certificate to Operate. The applicant's representative, Terry L. Williamson,,'was present and agreed to the conditions-. Mr. Strange asked for clarification from Staff that'the Fire Department had reviewed and approved the fire lanes as indicated, and Staff assured him this had been done. USE PERMIT NO. 87-62 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of Use Permit No. 87-62 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. -14- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 15 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated July 10, 1987, shall be the approved layout. 2. The applicant shall provide for clean-up of the area after the event. 3. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. 4. The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, Administrative Services Department, and/or shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement to be executed at least five (5) days prior to the event. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The use shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 2. A Certificate to Operate shall be issued by the Department of Community Development as required by Section 9730.80 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Use Permit No. 87-62 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. NOTE TO APPLICANT: You are hereby notified that, for future events, this Department must receive your complete Temporary Outdoor Event application a minimum of four (4) weeks Prior to the event for adequate review and processing. If this procedure is not followed, your application will not be processed. Also, for your information, you may process up to three (3) one -day events at a time provided they are all within a few months of one another. -15- 7/15/87 - OZA Minutes of Meeting H. B. Office of Zoning Administrator July 15, 1987 Page 16 There was no further business to be presented to the Acting Zoning Administrator for review. THE REGULAR MEETING WAS ADJOURNED BY THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, JULY 20, 1987, AT 10:00 A.M. A� - . 'L-� ,'-" ames W. Palin V Zoning Administrator jgh (8638d) 1 -16- 7/15/87 - OZA