HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-11-18MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Room B-6 - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1987 - 1:30 P.M.
ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR PRESENT: Mike Strange
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Laura Phillips
Kelly Main
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-46
Applicant: Zaher Khalaf
Conditional Exception No. 87-46 is a request to permit 1) 10 foot building separation in
lieu of a 15 foot separation, 2) backing of cars onto the street from a multi -family
residence located at 16632 Algonquin Street.
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental
Quality Act, 1986.
Staff member, Laura Phillips, reported that this item was continued by the Zoning
Administrator to address two concerns. One was the status of the parcel in whether or
not it was a buildable site, the other had to do with Public Works concerns regarding
backing cars onto Algonquin which is an arterial highway. The applicant has come up with
a site plan which uses the existing lot for access and will have a pull through garage and
two other pull through spaces for guests so that the cars will be able to pull head first
onto Algonquin and use of the tire puncture device will prohibit cars from driving in off of
Algonquin. Staff had the site plan reviewed by Public Works and the Fire Department and
and they have no problems with this design and therefore staff is recommending approval
of the site plan. The applicant has submitted some papers which show how the applicant
acquired the site, however the Zoning Administrator still has some question since the title
report is not available regarding how the site got into private hands from an abandoned
street. Another matter came to staff's attention this week that in conjunction with the
conditional exception was a use permit which was originally filed on this application which
was not advertised. Therefore, staff will be sending out another letter and an action can
be taken on the use permit next week. The applicant has been informed that an action
cannot be taken this week, and must be postponed until next week.
The public hearing was opened and Zaher Khalaf, applicant along with Tony Walker, his
attorney, were present and concurred with the continuance. Mr. Khalaf also stated that
Mr. Walker was present to answer any questions as to the title of the property and how it
was acquired. Mr. Walker stated that due to the way the property was acquired, it was
impossible to obtain a title report. He stated that he brought copies of all the default
judgments and settlement agreements regarding the property. Mr. Strange asked if Mr.
Khalaf had clear title on the property. Mr. Walker stated yes.
There was no one else present to speak for or against the request so the public hearing
•,gas closed.
-1- OZA 11/18/87
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-46 WAS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 25, 1987 BY
THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-82
Applicant: Raymond Millard
Conditional Exception No. 87-82 is a request to reduce minimum required open space
dimension from 20 feet to 11 feet 2 inches located at 21312 Seaforth Lane.
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental
Quality Act, 1986.
Staff member, Kelly Main, reported that this is a request to reduce minimum required
open space from 20 feet to 11 feet 2 inches. It is an addition to the rear of the house.
The open space remaining will be 937 square feet so it is still over the open space
requirement. Ms. Main stated that she received a number letters from the applicant's
neighborhood in concurrence with the project. Staff is recommending denial because the
lot is a rectangular shaped lot 60 x 102, and staff feels the applicant could enjoy the full
benefits of an addition without infringing upon his open space dimension. Staff stated
that an alternative would be to continue the item and have the applicant work with staff
on reaching a better compromise.
The public hearing was opened and Raymond Millard, applicant was present.
There was no one else present to speak for or against the request so the public hearing
was closed.
Staff and the applicant discussed some alternatives and decided that the applicant would
reduce the addition by 2 feet off the nook area and 2 feet off the den area giving the
applicant a dimension of 14 feet on the rear setback and 16 feet from the rear property
line of the family room.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 87-82 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL:
1. Granting of reduction in open space minimum dimension will not reduce the required
total open space area (900 Square Feet).
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including the
siting of the lot, particularly the dwelling's front setback of 38 feet 6 inches, the
strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property
of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classifications.
3. The granting of a Conditional Exception is necessary in order to preserve the
enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights.
4. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 87-82 will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications
because area residents have submitted a petition in favor of the proposal.
5. The granting of the Conditional Exception will not adversely affect the General Plan
of the City of Huntington Beach.
-2- OZA 11/18/87
1
6. Past approval of a similar variance in the neighborhood, Conditional Exception No.
84-23, provided precedence.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the nook and family room area to be
pulled back from the rear property line by 2 feet, allowing the narrowest setback
from the rear to be 13 feet 2 inches.
2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable
material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them.
3. The proposed addition shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures.
4. The height of the addition is restricted to one (1) story.
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS:
1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code,
Building Division, and Fire Department.
2. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes,
Ordinances, and standards.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-1203
Applicant: Larry Christensen/Alpine Consultants, Inc.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 84-1203 is a request to permit an extension of time to create a
five parcel medical/office/hospital complex located at 17772-17782 Beach Boulevard.
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Class 5, California Environmental
Quality Act, 1986.
Staff member, Kelly Main, reported that this is a second request for an extension of
time. The findings for approval are the same as previously given. There was a condition
placed on the existing office building which is now occupied that the parcel map be
recorded before it was given occupancy at the Humana site so there is some concern that
this parcel map be recorded as soon as possible.
Larry Christensen, representing the applicant was present. Mr. Strange asked Mr.
Christensen how much time he was requesting. Mr. Christensen answered that they would
probably be done in 30 days but the firm is having difficultly obtaining signatures from
lenders on the parcel map.
Mr. Strange granted the extension of the Parcel Map No. 84-1203 for 6 months.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-1203 WAS APPROVED BY THE ACTING ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR FOR SIX MONTHS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND
CONDITIONS AS PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL:
1. The proposed subdivision of five (5) parcels for purposes of industrial (commercial)
use in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of
development.
-3- OZA 11/18/87
2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting
forth objectives for implementation of this type of use.
3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the
land use designation for community business district allowing commercial buildings
was placed on the subject property.
4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features
of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with
standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with
the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO tiJSE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAID PARCEL(S) FOR
ANY PURPOSE:
I. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development
on November 14, 1984, shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted
thereon).
2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works
and recorded with the Orange County Recorder.
3. Beach Boulevard and Newman Avenue shall be dedicated to City standards.
4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the
time said parcels are developed.
5. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at
the time said parcels are developed.
6. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed.
7. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances.
8. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district at the time
said parcels are developed. (Contact the Department of Public Works for additional
information).
9. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community
Development.
10. All vehicular access rights to Beach Boulevard and Newman Avenue shall be
dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the
Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission.
11. This extension of time is for six months. Should the applicant require an additional
extension, a request shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator in writing at
least 30 days prior to the expiration of the six month period.
-4- OZA 11/18/87
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO THE NOVEMBER 23, 1987 STUDY SESSION BY
THE ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
Mike Strange
Acting Zoning Administrator
2198r
-5- OZA 11/18/87