Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-10-04APPROVED 11/1/88 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 4, 1988 STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A P P P P ROLL CALL: Slates, Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega P P Higgins, Bourguignon A. CONSENT CALENDAR None B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Livengood, in follow up to the study session on Angus Oil Consolidation Project, requested a detailed report on alternate sites and reasons for not considering them. Commissioner Silva addressed his concern with the inadequate parking situation at the center on Springdale and Edinger and requested a follow-up report be prepared. C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS C-1 USE PERMIT NO 88-34/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-85/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 88-275/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-22 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 20 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: CARDINAL DEVELOPMENT CO. Use Permit No. 88-34, Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 88-85, Tentative Parcel Map No. 88-275 and Negative Declaration No. 88-22 were continued from the September 20, 1988 Planning Commission meeting in order for the applicant to redesign the project based on direction from staff and concerns from abutting neighbors. The applicant has submitted a revised project which depicts approximately 21,000 square feet of auto service and limited retail, and a 2,200 square foot drive-thru restaurant with additional parking provided on -site. The request also includes a variance for 14 tandem compact parking spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore, Negative Declaration No. 88-22 is an adequate evaluation. Mitigation measures for possible environmental impacts such as noise, fumes, light and glare have been incorporated in the suggested conditions of approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (A) Approve Use Permit No. 88-34 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 88-275 based upon a revised building layout as recommended by staff with findings and conditions of approval; and (B) Deny Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 88-85 with findings. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Carl Middleton, applicant, spoke in support of the request. He submitted a list of conditions requested by adjacent property owners to be imposed on the project and stated total agreement with the conditions. He urged the Commission to approve his project. Donald Adams, 19331 Worchester Lane, stated his support for Plan B which includes a 70 foot setback (mitigating loss of light and air and potential noise). Robert Shaw, 19301 Worchester Lane, spoke in support of Plan B. He feels the applicant has been very cooperative and has proven that he wants to be a good neighbor. Hal Wignall, 19312 Worchester Lane; Larry Wehrer, 19271 Worchester Lane; Ken Inouye, 19321 Worchester Lane; and Amana Manor, 19311 Worchester Lane, spoke in support of Plan B (70 foot setback) with th conditions suggested by adjacent property owners. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -2- (1514d) There were no other persons present to speak for or against the proposed project and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA, TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 88-34, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 88-275 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-22, WITH REVISED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY HIGGINS, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-85 WITH FINDINGS AND REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 88-34 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed auto service center and drive-thru restaurant will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing in the immediate vicinity because potential noise, fumes, light and glare impacts will be mitigated. 2. The design and layout of the proposed project does properly adapt the proposed structures to adjacent existing structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 3. On -site parking/circulation for the proposed use will not create an undue traffic problem because of ample parking in front of auto service buildings and in front of the proposed drive-thru restaurant. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 88-275: 1. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for community business district was placed on the subject property. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -3- (1514d) 2. The proposed consolidation of parcels for purposes of commercial uses is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 3. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-85: 1. The 14 compact tandem parking spaces are in excess of required parking and will mitigate on -site parking impacts. 2. The project is providing 44% more parking spaces over the requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which will alleviate potential on -site parking and traffic inpacts. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO, 88-34: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 29, 1988, shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. C. Final parcel map shall be recorded. 3. No garage doors will be allowed on the east side of the building closest to the homes on the east side of the property, and all installation and repair activities will occur inside the buildings. 4. The applicant will construct an 8 foot high decorative concrete block wall on the east side of the property. This wall will be set back 5 feet from the property line and the applicant will grant a perpetual easement to the adjacent homeowners to incorporate this land area into their backyards. The applicant will landscape the area or give the homeowner an allowance equivalent to the cost to landscape the area and remove the existing wall, at each of the owner's option and at no expense tc the owner. In addition, the applicant will extend the adjacent homeowners' side -yard walls to meet the new 8 foot wall. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -4- (1514d) 5. Paging systems, loud speaker phones or similar noisy electronic devices are prohibited. The ordering device for the proposed fast food will be oriented in a direction away from the homes and be equipped with a volume control box set at a level which does not disturb the nearby homeowners nor exceed City Noise Standards. 6. No heavy mechanical repair, body work, painting transmission radiator or engine rebuilding operations will be allowed. 7. Any automotive repair or service facilities which frequently and customarily service automobiles with the engines running (e.g. a smog check facility), will be equipped with an air filtration system which removes exhaust fumes from the atmosphere. These systems will be inspected, tested and serviced as suggested by the manufacturer, but no less frequently than once a year. 8. The applicant will conduct the necessary drainage studies and construct the needed improvements to insure that the site development does not adversely affect the drainage onto adjacent residential properties and will also make any necessary repairs to adjacent homes for problems caused by its construction. 9. At the end of the first year of operations, the applicant will hire an independent consulting firm will test the noise levels and air quality from the on -site operations to insure that City noise standards in residential areas and air quality standards are being complied with and to suggest appropriate mitigation measures if required. Mitigation measures will be incorporated to meet the above standards. These studies will be conducted on an annual basis, or more frequently, if and as requested by the adjacent homeowners. 10. Days and Hours of Operation: a. Tenants performing automotive repair services will be limited to the following days and hours of operation: Monday through Friday 7:30 AM to 7:00 PM Saturdays 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM Sundays 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM (Lube facility in Building C only) b. Retail tenants (including 4-day Tire Stores but excluding the fast food) will be limited to the following days and hours of operation: Monday through Friday 8:00 AM to 9:00 PM Saturdays 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM Sundays 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM (Tire facility closed on Sundays) c. The fast food will be limited to the following hours of operation: Daily 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM 11. The fast food restaurant shall be equipped with a smoke arrestor and air filtration system. This system will be inspected, tested and serviced as suggested by the manufacturer, but no less frequently than once a year. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -5- (1514d) 12. Special architectural treatment shall be provided on all building walls. Such treatment is subject to approval by the Department of Community Development/Design Review Board. 13. A planned sign program shall be approved for all signing. Said program shall be approved prior to the first sign request. 14. On -site fire hydrants shall be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department. 15. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations. 16. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. 17. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. 18. Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches (2"). 19. Applicant shall pursue CalTrans approval of radius type driveways on Beach Boulevard. 20. Driveway on Beach Boulevard shall have a minimum width of thirty feet (30'). 21. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. 22. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building. 23. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 24. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of water heaters. 25. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 26. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 27. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer for access between subject site and properties to north and south. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the Count Recorder. A copy shall be filed with the Department of Communit Development prior to occupancy. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -6- (1514d) 28. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 29. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 30. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 31. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 32. Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and operation of all underground storage tanks. 33. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 34. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. 35. Drainage shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 88-275 1. The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Community Development on June 13, 1988 shall be approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with the City of Huntington Beach and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 4. All vehicular access rights along Beach Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except for locations approved by the Planning Commission. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -7- (1514d) C-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-23/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-24 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 7, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: RANDALL LUMBER CO. At the applicant's request, this item was continued from the September 7, 1988 Planning Commission meeting in order for the applicant to revise the site plan and discuss the suggested conditions of approval. Conditional Use Permit No. 88-23 is a request by Randall Lumber Co. to utilize a 1.25 acre site which is owned by the Southern Pacific Railroad to unload, load and store lumber products for a period of five (5) years pursuant to Section 9631, Temporary Storage Yards, of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development posted draft Negative Declaration No. 88-24 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 88-24 and Conditional Use Permit No. 88-23 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Dale Reeves, representing Randall Lumber Co., spoke in support of the request. He stated his willingness to accept conditions of approval except for the one requiring reciprocal access and the one limiting access from Cedar Avenue to emergency access only. He said he needed intermittent access for his trucks from Cedar Avenue and wanted a continuance if he could not have the condition waived. He agreed to waive the mandatory processing date. Mel Mermelstein, President of Ideal Pallet, spoke in opposition to the request. If approved he said it would put Ideal Pallet out of business. He stated there is an existing easement and Randall Lumber cannot close it. He said that the railroad is accepting rent payments for the easement. He referred the Commission to his letter dated September 1, 1988, and said that the matter was still in litigation and granting approval would be interfering in leasehold with the railroad. Mark Flippin, Ideal Pallet, said for the past 3 to 4 years, because of access blockage, Ideal Pallet has had to use trucks for supplies and that truck traffic has increased. He feels traffic and safety in the area will be impaired if approval is granted. Edie Mermelstein, said truck traffic has increased in the area and will get worse if the request is approved. She urged the Commission to deny. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -8- (1514d) There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. The Commission agreed that there is increased truck traffic on Gothard and asked City Attorney if there was a valid existing lease. The City Attorney said he had not seen proof of a valid lease for the easement however the Courts could provide if requested. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SILVA, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-23 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-24 TO THE NOVEMBER 1, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO 87-4/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 87-5 APPLICANT: ASCON PROPERTIES, INC. General Plan Amendment No. 87-4 is a request to amend the land use designation on the Ascon site from Public, Quasi -Public, Institutional to General Commercial and High Density Residential designation. The proposal specifies approximately 6.4 acres of commercial land use at the southwest corner of Hamilton Avenue and Magnolia Street surrounded on the west and south by about 33 acres of residentially designated land. The applicant is proposing about 83,000 square feet of commercial use and up to 900 dwelling units on the residentially designated land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the City Council certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 87-5 and approval of General Plan Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-4 and adopt Resolution 1405. The recommended land use designation is 6.4 acres of General Commercial and 33 acres of Medium Density Residential. Dick Harlow, representing the applicant, requested a continuance as a result of the study session held earlier. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -9- (1514d) ON MOTION BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, THIS ITEM WAS HEARD OUT OF ORDER, AS A RESULT OF THE STUDY SESSION HELD AT 6:00 PM, TO RECOMMEND CONTINUANCE, WITH PUBLIC NOTIFICATION, WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO STAFF FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION REGARDING SITE CLEAN-UP OPTIONS, TIME ESTIMATES, AND FINANCIAL ESTIMATES; SCHEDULED WORKSHOP; FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Commission requested the item be continued to a date 15 days following receipt of the requested reports. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO CONTINUE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 87-4 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 87-5, TO THE DECEMBER 6, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-4 ZONE CHANGE NO. 88-18 APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH On June 2, 1986, the City Council adopted a Land Use Plan for the non -certified coastal zone area along Pacific Coast Highway, between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. On April 13, 1987 the California Coastal Commission certified the Land Use Plan as submitted by the City. The Land Use Plan, as certified, designates approximately 7.0 acres as Visitor Serving Commercial, 125 acres as Conservation, 83 acres as Industrial Energy Production and 17.0 acres as Industrial Energy Production/Conservation. The purpose of this zone change is to apply appropriate zoning designations to the properties in order to achieve consistency with the Land Use designations and to complete certification of the Local Coastal Program for the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Continue Zone Change No. 88-18 to November 1, 1988. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -10- (1514d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY LIVENGOOD, TO CONTINUE ZONE CHANGE NO. 88-18 TO THE NOVEMBER 1, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-5 TENTATIVE TRACT 13694/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-46 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 88-33 APPLICANT: AMIREH AMIRANI Conditional Use Permit No. 88-46 with Special Permits and Tentative Tract 13694 constitute a request to subdivide two parcels into five lots, and to construct five single family homes under Planned Development (-PD) standards, pursuant to Section 9150.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The 0.72 acre site is zoned R1, however the developer has chosen to develop to the R1-PD standards. A total of six special permits are requested in order to provide a site layout similar to the surrounding R1 neighborhoods. It should be noted that the requested special permits are not variances, but may be granted to provide flexibility in achieving a better site design. The special permits are as follows: to permit 1) 5 feet interior side yard setbacks for two homes in lieu of 17.2 foot and 14.4 foot setbacks; 2) Reduction of building separation between two homes from 12.5 feet to 11 feet; 3) Reduction of separation between dwelling and private accessway on 4 lots from 15 feet to 8 feet-13 feet; 4) Elimination of common open space and main recreation area requirements in favor of providing private yards; 5) Reduction of private accessway width from 36 feet wide to 20 feet wide; 6) To allow tandem spaces in private driveways to count toward required guest parking. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development posted draft Negative Declaration No. 88-33 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Alan Marshall, representing the applicant, spoke in support of the request and stated concurrence with all conditions of approval. He requested further study with staff regarding the security gates. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -11- (1514d) There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-33, TENTATIVE TRACT 13694, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-46 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, WITH REVISED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-46: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of a 5-unit planned development will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor to property and improvements in the vicinity. 2. The granting of the conditional use permit for a 5-unit planned development will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. 4. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed homes properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 5. The access to and parking for the proposed use does not create an undue traffic problem. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMITS: 1. The following special permits promote a better living environment by adapting the Planned Development requirements to better suit detached single family homes, which are compatible with the surrounding area: a. Five feet interior side yard setbacks for two homes in lieu of 17.2 foot and 14.4 foot setbacks; b. Reduction of building separation between two homes from 12.5 feet to 11 feet; c. Reduction of separation between dwelling and private accessway on 4 lots from 15 feet to 8 feet-12 feet; PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -12- (1514d) d. Elimination of common open space and main recreation area requirements in favor of providing private yards; e. Reduction of private accessway width from 36 feet wide to 20 feet wide; f. To allow tandem spaces in private driveways to count toward required guest parking. 2. The requested special permits provide for maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping and design. 3. The requested special permits will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general. 4. The requested special permits are consistent with the objectives of the Planned Residential Development standards in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 13694: 1. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential and R1 zoning were implemented. 3. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for the implementation of this type of housing. 4. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of 4 units per gross acre. 5. The tentative tract is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 88-46: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated September 19, 1988, shall be the approved layout, with the following modifications: a. Proposed walls shall conform with corner cut-off requirements of Article 977, and final design shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -13- (1514d) 2. b. Bedroom count shall be reduced from 20 overall to 15 overall, in accordance with Section 9150.4 of the Ordinance Code. c. Pedestrian access to Heil Avenue and Newland Street shall be incorporated in the perimeter wall design for emergency access pursuant to Fire Department requirements. d. Driveways for Lots 4 and 5 shall be revised to take access from the reciprocal access easement, with straight driveways. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State licensed landscape architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity), irrigation plan, grading plan and approved site plan, and copy of conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 and Article 915 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan b. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. d. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works approval. e. Final Tract Map shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development. f. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to assure adequate parking is available for employees, customers, contractors, etc., during the project's construction phase. g. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -14- (1514d) h. Applicant shall submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for the file. i. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. j. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 3. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 4. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve (12) months. 5. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 6. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 7. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 8. If subsurface archaeological remains are encountered during development, construction shall be halted at once, the City Planning Department shall be notified and a reputable archaeologist shall be contracted for an assessment. 9. During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall: a. Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures. b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -15- (1514d) 10. During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day, c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment, d. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 11. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 12. Installation of a security gate shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Department and Community Development Department. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 13694: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated September 19, 1988, shall be the approved layout. 2. Public Works requirements are as follows: a. All vehicular access rights to Newland Street and Heil Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. b. The existing drainage system on the south side of Heil from the east side of Newland to Irby Street shall be removed and replaced with City -approved drainage facilities. A cross -gutter will not be allowed across Newland Street. c. Construct all required roadway improvements on Newland Street, Heil Avenue and Irby Street. d. Parkway improvements on all adjacent streets shall match the existing improvements as approved by the Public Works Department. e. Landscaping within the public right-of-way shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. f. All walls shall be located on private property. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -16- (1514d) g. Water facilities shall be constructed per Water Division requirements. Each dwelling unit shall be individually metered. h. Traffic signal conduit shall be installed across Newland Street and Heil Avenue with pull boxes per Traffic Division's requirements. i. Striping plan for Newland Street and Heil Avenue shall be approved by the Public Works Department. j. No parking will be permitted on Newland Street or Heil Avenue. k. Dedicate and improve proposed alley per Public Works Department requirements. 3. Prior to recordation of the final tract map, CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney and the Department of Community Development. The CC&R's shall reflect the common driveway access easements, and maintenance of all walls and common landscape areas by the Homeowners' Association. C-6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO�88-28 (RECONSIDERATION) APPLICANT: TEXAS LOOSEYS Reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-25 is a request to establish dancing to recorded music (Disc Jockey) seven nights a week and lunch hour fashion shows five days per week, Monday to Friday, in an existing restaurant. The applicant has indicated that the proposed dancing will be from 8:30 PM to 12:30 AM. Pursuant to Section 9220.1(d)D, a conditional use permit is required to establish dancing and/or live entertainment. The proposed disc jockey (D.J.) is considered live entertainment; and the daytime fashion shows require an entertainment permit issued by the Police Department which must also be approved by conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88-28 (Reconsideration) with findings. The applicant requested a continuance to the October 18, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -17- (1514d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-28 (RECONSIDERATION) TO THE OCTOBER 18, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 88-13/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 88-14 APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Conditional Use Permit No. 88-13 is a request to permit a street sweeper drop site (a public utility facility) on a City -owned parcel located at 10371 Adams (north side of Adams Avenue, west of Santa Ana River). The subject site was previously used by the Talbert Reservoir which contained treated sewage water for irrigation purposes. The activity of the proposed use includes the dumping of street sweeping debris on the site, loading into 40-yard bins, and transporting the loads weekly to an off -site location. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development posted draft Negative Declaration No. 88-14 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 88-14 and Conditional Use Permit No. 88-13 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Carol Felix, 19931 Carmania Lane, said she cannot see the dump site from her residence however she can smell it. She said the site is being used as a mini -dump and does not contain just clippings from the street sweepers. She feels the conditions imposed are ineffective and urged the Commission to deny the request. She further stated the site is located just opposite the "Welcome to Huntington Beach" sign and feels it is inappropriate. Mike Seday, 19932 Carmania, stated his backyard is adjacent to the dump site and the odor is his biggest objection. Kevin McElroy, 19882 Carmania, spoke in opposition. He are a lot of small children in the area and feels with rodent problem caused by the dump site that it presents their health and welfare. said there the odor and a danger to PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -18- (1514d) Greg Ferree, 20732 Brookdale, spoke in opposition to the request. He feels the City should locate a site somewhere else in the City that isn't near residential. He said the site is an eyesore, its noisy and it smells. Ron Ferree, 19912 Carmania, said he has put up with this dump site for 10 years and urged the Commission to deny the request. He feels the City should find a new location instead of spending money to improve this site. He said the Edison Company is concerned with the dust on their lines because of a possible fire and the adjacent residents are also concerned. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY SILVA, TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-13 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 88-14, WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED The Planning Commission further requested that the street sweeper drop site be moved to another location and a chain link/security fence be erected to further prevent the public from using the area as a dump site. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY HIGGINS, TO INSTALL A CHAINLINK FENCE AT THE SITE FOR SECURITY REASONS, RECESSED TO KEEP THE PUBLIC OUT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed street sweeper drop site is similar to an industrial activity and will not be compatible with adjacent residential properties. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -19- (1514d) 2. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the street sweeper drop site will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity due to increased noise, traffic, odor and dust generated by the activity. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the street sweeper drop site will be detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the residential neighborhood. 4. History of complaints and lack of follow-up does not demonstrate good faith to assure compliance with conditions if the project were to be approved. (October 6, 1987 - memo from Planning Commission to Public Works Department requesting conditional use permit for use resulting from complaints from adjacent residents; October 16, 1987, no response or commitment; September 19, 1988, conditional use permit application submitted with no demonstration of sufficient mitigation measures to negate impacts to surrounding neighborhood). C-8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-40 APPLICANT: BENCO BEACH, LTD. Conditional Use Permit No. 88-40 is a request to permit the operation of a family billiard and arcade center which will also Y include a food snack bar located at 19092 Beach Boulevard. The main focus of the billiard/arcade center is to provide a family oriented, tasteful, clean and well managed entertainment environment. The proposed billiard/arcade center will occupy four suites totalling approximately 4,950 square feet at the Plaza de la Playa Center on the east side of Beach Boulevard, 247 feet south of Garfield Avenue. _ ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Jerry Bame, respresenting the applicant, spoke in support of the request. He said the other tenants in the shopping center support the request and the applicant will comply with an annual review. He opposed the condition requiring a minimum of two 21-year olds on the premises. Greg Stewart, owner, spoke in support of the request and stated his intention is to be a good neighbor and that his establishment will serve no alcohol, and will not allow drugs or gambling. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -20- (1514d) Jeff Siegfield, 19105-B Beachcrest Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. His residence is adjacent to the wall separating the two properties. He feels there will be loitering in the parking lot creating a noise problem for the adjacent residents. Mike Ali, 19105-C Beachcrest Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. He feels the establishment will create drug problems, a hangout for disruptive teens, bad atmosphere, and will cause police problems. He urged denial. Debby Huffman, 8102 Dartmoor, spoke in opposition to the request because of the mixed -use in the center. She stated there are 5 schools in the area and the establishment will create problems and cause her property value to go down. She further stated the "absent -owner" will invest only $50,000 and the adjacent property owners have invested $350,000. Mia Conley, 19115-F Beachcrest Lane, is opposed to the proposed use due to the mixed uses in the area, easy access to liquor for use outside the proposed establishment and her concern for the youth in the area. Susan Counts, 8115-C Sureline Drive, feels the proposed use will create more traffic, noise, theft and vandalism and also feels it will create a bad environment for youth. Duane McMurtrey, 19125-B Beachcrest Lane, spoke in opposition to the proposed use. Jack Grimes, 19110-A Beachcrest, is opposed to the use because of the potential of added crime and traffic. Phil Segel, 19142 Beach Boulevard, owner of Subway Sandwich, said he was not pressured to sign the petition in support of the use. He feels it will create more business for his establishment. He also feels that if there are problems that the Planning Commission can revoke the conditional use permit. Bob Britt, 8112 Dartmoor, expressed opposition because he does not feel that two people offers enough control for this particular use. Nanette Markham, 19105-D Beachcrest Lane; and Sue Von, 8102 Dartmore, stated opposition to the use. Frank Bennett, President of Benco, urged approval for a chance to prove that a clean operation can be run in the center. He feels that with a one year review if there are problems the conditional use permit can be revoked. He also stated that there is no liquor presently permitted in the center. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -21- (1514d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY LIVENGOOD, TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-40, WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Ortega NOES: Higgins, Leipzig, Bourguignon ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None TIE VOTE - AUTOMATICALLY CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 18, 1988 MEETING C-9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-26 APPLICANT: ARTHUR AND NONA NELLES Conditional Use Permit No. 88-26 is a request to permit a 650 square foot second unit addition to an existing single family dwelling, pursuant to Section 9110.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, located at 8311 Rolf Circle. A second unit or "Granny Unit" may be permitted by the Planning Commission subject to approval of a conditional use permit and compliance with applicable ordinances. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-26 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Donn Strook, 18182 Hartlund Street, expressed concern with parking. She said the addition is good for this owner but if the house was ever sold the City would have no control of the addition becoming a rental unit. She requested the driveway to be extended to provide more parking. Robert Cronk, 18312 Hartlund Lane, stated approval of the addition would set a precedent in the area. He feels the building can be altered in the future and could be sold at two units. He urged approval with the deletion of the kitchen and the addition of connecting doors. Nona Nelles, applicant, said she had lived in the home for 31 years and has no intention of selling and that she is adding to the driveway for additional parking. Mr. Smith, designer/architect, spoke in support of the addition. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -22- (1514d) J 1 A MOTION WAS MADE BY HIGGINS, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-26, WITH FINDINGS AND REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Leipzig, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: Silva, Ortega ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of a second unit will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor to property and improvements in the vicinity. 2. The granting of the conditional use permit for a second unit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and Land Use Map. 4. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed second unit properly adapts the proposed structure to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner, and will comply with requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated September 27, 1988, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modification: a. The driveway shall be widened easterly to accommodate an additional vehicle for a total of three vehicles. 2. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 3. Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures. 4. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -23- (1514d) 5. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 6. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division and Fire Department. 7. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and standards. 8. The park and recreation fee shall be assessed at 25 percent of the fee for a single family residence. 9. No separate utility meters shall be permitted for the second unit. 10. The following safety and conservation measures for the new unit shall be implemented: a. Insulation of accessible attic areas to R-19. b. Weatherstripping of doors and windows. C. Installation of low flow shower heads and faucets certified by the California Energy Commission. d. Installation of approved smoke detectors. C-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-39/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-30 APPLICANT: LISA PRODAN/R. M. MILLER The applicant has remodeled and expanded a small beach cottage at 808 Pecan, by removing a patio cover/porch and replacing it with the construction of new interior floor area. The construction work, which increased the 250 square foot structure by 75 square feet, was done without proper permits in 1980. The City investigated after a complaint from a neighbor. The case was turned over to the City Attorney's Office for prosecution, and the owner attempted to file proper entitlements in both 1980 and 1982. These applications were rejected as incomplete. The most recent correspondence from the Attorney's Office requested that the applicant file for a conditional use permit and conditional exception by August 19, 1988. The applicant has complied with this order. The conditional use permit is necessary to expand an existing nonconforming structure, but this is limited by code to a maximum of 10 percent of the original floor area. A conditional exception to this requirement is needed since the remodeling included a 30 percent expansion. A second conditional exception is required because the addition encroaches 3 feet-8 inches into the front setback requirement of 12 feet. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -24- (1514d) 11 I ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. SPECIFIC PLAN: The site is located within the Townlot Specific Plan -District A, which serves as the zoning designation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88-39 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 88-30 with findings. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Robert Cronk, 18312 Hartlund Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. He feels the property should be restored to its original condition. Dave Francis, 501 Eighth Street, stated opposition to the illegal building. He has spent over $750 on lawyers because of numerous complaints regarding the building. He said the wiring is illegal creating a hazard for potential fires and accidents and that he will hold the City liable if the house is not removed. Lisa Prodan, 16111 Beach Boulevard, stated her electrical permits have been finaled, the house is more attractive now than it was originally, and that the conditions of approval will be complied with if approved. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. The Commission requested an amendment that the planter be moved back to the property line with a 90 day review to verify compliance with all conditions. A MOTION WAS MADE BY HIGGINS, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-39 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-30, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVALD, WITH A REVIEW IN 90 DAYS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Leipzig, NOES: Silva, Ortega ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Higgins, Bourguignon PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -25- (1514d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-39: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the non -conforming structure will not be detrimental to: a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the conditional use permit for the nonconforming expansion will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The alteration/addition does not increase the number of stories. 4. The alteration/addition improves the structure's aesthetic appearance. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88-30 1. The granting of a reduction in the minimum front setback requirement to 8 feet-4 inches and a 30 percent expansion in floor area is less intrusive since the lot's front yard is oriented to what is the side yard of most other properties in the vicinity. 2. Due to special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size and shape, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. The size of the lot is well below the minimum requirement, 1,125 square feet versus 2,500 square feet. 3. The creation of one on -site parking space as required by conditions of approval will bring the site further into conformance with code and lessen existing impacts on surrounding properties. 4. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 88-30 for the minimum front setback to 8 feet-4 inches and the 30 percent expansion in floor area will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classification. 5. The structure, as modified, is generally attractively designed and an improvement for the neighborhood. 6. The granting of the conditional exception for the nonconforming expansion will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -26- (1514d) I 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated August 19, 1988, shall be the approved layout except as noted below. A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting the modifications described herein: a. Existing patio cover which is attached to perimeter fence shall be removed. b. One paved on -site parking space shall be provided with access to the alley. 2. All wiring for the entire structure shall comply with the Uniform Electrical Code prior to final inspection. 3. Structural calculations shall be submitted to the Building Division to show roof framing as adequate. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. A plan check shall be performed by the Planning and Building Divisions. Once a permit is issued, calls for inspection should be made to verify compliance with approved plans. This may require spot checking of footing, spot removal of dry wall, etc. 5. Applicant shall work with Fire Department, Public Works and Community Development to mitigate any problems with planter that may encroach into the existing alley right-of-way. If Fire or Public Works Department determines dedication of alley is needed in the future the planter shall be removed. 6. A 90-day review shall be conducted by Community Development Department to ensure compliance with these conditions. D. ITEMS NOT PUBLIC HEARING D-1 RECONSIDERATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 87-27/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 87-22 APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA STANDARDS ASSOCIATES Ronald T. Safren, President of California Standards Associates is requesting the deletion of the affordable housing requirement for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-27. Conditional Use Permit No. 87-27 was approved for a three-story, 4 unit condominium development on a 50-foot lot on the north side of Pacific Coast Highway, 50 feet east of Fourteenth Street. At the Planning Commission meeting of September 15, 1987, the Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 87-27 with three special permits. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -27- (1514d) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the deletion of the Affordable Housing Requirement for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-27 and Coastal Development Permit No. 87-22 with revised findings and all conditions of approval remaining in effect. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA, TO APPROVE THE DELETION OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-17 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 87-22 WITH REVISED FINDINGS AND ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REMAINING IN EFFECT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: Silva ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDING FOR APPROVAL: 1. The Mello Bill Affordable Housing requirements, Government Code Section 65590(d), is satisfied in the following manner: a. The City has provided density bonuses within three miles of the coastal zone which have provided affordable housing. b. Due to the location and economics involved it would not be feasible to develop affordable housing on this site. The value of the land coupled with the small scale project (4 units) prohibit the ability to provide for affordable housing. D-2 PLAN REVIEW FOR CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-07 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0. 88-3 (MAIN PIER PHASE 1-PIER COLONY) Per the Planning Commission's direction at the April 19, 1988 Planning Commission meeting, the conceptual plan as approved by the Planning Commission has been modified to address all of the Commission's concerns and conditions of approval. Condition of approval No. 17 stated the following: "Any modifications to plans shall be subject to additional review and approval by the Planning Commission. Any modifications which result in an increase of project intensity shall be subject to additional public hearings. Modifications to interior layouts or exterior finishes shall be subject to Design Review Board review and approval." PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -28- (1514d) �11 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the modifications to the plan dated September 26, 1988, with all former findings and conditions of approval. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO REVISE PLANS TO BETTER REFLECT ORIGINALLY APPROVED ARCHITECTURE AND REDUCE BUILDING BULK, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES: Silva ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED E. DISCUSSION ITEMS None F. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES The following items were added to the inquiries list: 1. FOUR-PLEX ON ROOSEVELT AVENUE (MOODY PROPERTY) - owner is requiring on -street parking by the residents. 2. FOR RENT SIGNS AND SALES OFFICE TRAILER - SOUTHEAST CORNER MOODY/PEARCE 3. LEFT LANE TURN ARROWS AT TRAFFIC LIGHTS - WARNER/SPRINGDALE - When will they be installed and what lights in the City are scheduled for left lane turn arrows. 4. BAY AND RACQUET CLUB - Requested a report on procedures on coastal development permits. G. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS Commission requested that the amendment to the Planning Commission By -Laws be agendized for the October 18, 1988 meeting. PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -29- (1514d) H. I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS Planning Commission review and approval of Condition No. 38 on North of the Pier Parking Structure was requested. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 38 ON NORTH OF THE PIER PARKING STRUCTURE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ADJOURNMENT Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, A MOTION WAS MADE AT 12:47 AM BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY HIGGINS, TO ADJOURN TO A STUDY SESSION, TUESDAY, 5:30 PM, OCTOBER 18, 1988, IN ROOM B-8, AND THEN TO THE REGULAR MEETING AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Bourguignon NOES: None ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED MINUTES APPROVED: 1 4, k Mi � Mike Ada", Secretary Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, i Victor Leipzig, Cha' PC Minutes - 10/4/88 -30- (1514d)