Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-07-18APPROVED 3/1/89 1 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 18, 1989 Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P P P ROLL CALL: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega P P Mountford, Leipzig A. CONSENT CALENDAR A-1 MINUTES - JUNE 6, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 20, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO APPROVE MINUTES DATED JUNE 6, 1989, AS CORRECTED, AND MINUTES DATED JUNE 20, 1989, AS SUBMITTED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Kay Richards, 67281 Briarcliff Drive, voiced her complaints and concerns with code violations occurring at the Hebrew Academy on Willow Lane and requested monitoring and enforcement by the Planning Commission. Her concerns included: inoperable vehicles left on the grounds; caretaker and family living in trailer on the site; large dirt pile on south side of property; school van and school bus parked on grass; and overall lack of maintenance on the site. B-1 PLANNING COMMISSION SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS Commissioner Kirkland reported actions taken by the Design Review Board during their July meetings. Commissioner Williams discussed meetings held with the Oil Committee. He said focus is being concentrated on the diminishing oil production in the City and concerns regarding the safety and aesthetics of oil facilities. Chairman Bourguignon attended the first meeting of the Committee on Solar Rooms/Windscreens in the harbor and said it was very successful. He thanked staff for their participation. Commissioner Ortega discussed the recently scheduled FHP Subcommittee meeting. She said progress is being made at the FHP site. Commissioner Leipzig discussed the Coastal Zone '89 Conference held in South Carolina in which he attended and said the "Bolsa Chica" wetland area drew nationwide interest. Another topic that drew nationwide interest was "ocean disposal of sewage waste." I 1 PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -2- (3292d) C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS C-1 REVOCATION HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-5 (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 6, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: FHP, INC. LOCATION: 19066 Magnolia Street (southeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue) On May 2, 1989, the Planning Commission reviewed a parking study dated March 27, 1989, submitted by FHP for the Senior Medical Center. The Planning Commission expressed concern that the number of appointments per hour and enrollment at the Center, combined with the configuration of the parking lot, may result in limited parking opportunities for customers visiting other businesses at the shopping plaza. The Commission directed staff to schedule a public hearing for June 6, 1989, so that representatives of FHP could attend and present reasons why the conditional use permit for the senior center should not be revoked. On June 6, 1989, the Planning Commission formed a subcommittee consisting of FHP representatives, center tenants, landowners, and Commissioners Bourguignon and Ortega. The purpose of the subcommittee was to formulate a parking management plan to address tenant designated parking, alternative methods of transporting patients to and from the center, and other measures to alleviate parking problems. The revocation hearing was continued to July 18, 1989. Since June 6, the subcommittee has met twice to discuss the various problems at the center and to suggest possible solutions. The City selected a parking consultant, Parsons Brinckerhoff, to design alternative layouts for the parking area, with the goal to provide more stalls with better accessibility to the tenants. As of July 12, 1989, Garfield Plaza is under new ownership. A representative attended the July 12 subcommittee meeting and expressed a desire to work with the tenants to ease parking demand. Given the new ownership of the center, and the subcommittee's wish to review further studies currently underway by the parking consultant, the subcommittee agreed to recommend a 30-day continuance of the revocation hearing, to August 15, 1989. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Continue revocation hearing of Conditional Use Permit No. 87-5 for 30 days to the August 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Gary Goldstein, representing FHP, Inc., spoke in support of the continuance. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the revocation and the public hearing was closed. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -3- (3292d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-5 TO THE AUGUST 15, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Williams (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-2 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 89-225/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 89-23/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-19 APPLICANT: G. P. BUILDING ENTERPRISES, INC. LOCATION: 7921-31 Glencoe (west of Beach Boulevard) The applicant's request is for the subdivision of a 115 foot by 135 foot parcel into two parcels, one with 60 feet of frontage and one with 55 feet of frontage. The latter parcel requires a variance to the minimum lot width of 60 feet required pursuant to Section 9120.2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The intent of the applicant is to construct a four-plex on the larger lot and a tri-plex on the smaller lot for a total of seven units. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 89-12, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-225 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-23, with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There was no one present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. Concerns were expressed by the Commission regarding the increase of one unit (density) on the subject property as a result of the lot split. The existing R2 zoned parcel allows 6 units; the lot split would allow 3 units on one parcel and 4 units on the other for a total of 7. It was felt, however, that the lot split with one reciprocal driveway would be more attractive than two lots with two driveways. After further discussion, it was felt that the lot split and resulting density was consistent with the surrounding area. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -4- (3292d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO DENY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-225, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-23 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-19, WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Williams, Ortega NOES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Leipzig, Mountford ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION FAILED A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-225, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-23 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-19, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: Williams, Ortega ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-225: 1. The proposed subdivision of this .36 acre lot into two (2) parcels for purposes of residential use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for medium density residential was placed on the subject property. 4. The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards, plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-23: 1. Granting of the conditional exception (variance) for a 55 foot wide lot will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of residents of neighboring properties or injurious to improvement of property in the vicinity due to the proposed reciprocal driveway easement. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -5- (3292d) 2. Granting of the conditional exception (variance) for a 55 foot wide lot will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3. Granting of the conditional exception (variance) for a 55 foot wide lot does not constitute a grant of special privilege from other properties in the vicinity. 4. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, location, or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under identical zone classifications. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 89-225: 1. The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on July 7, 1989, shall be the approved layout. 2. A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of any building permits, and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water system at the time said parcel is developed. 4. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time said parcel is developed. 5. All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel is developed. 6. The tentative parcel map shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances. 7. A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. 8. All Public Works improvements shall be constructed to City standards. 9. Drainage flow/direction shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. 10. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit). A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. 11 PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -6- (3292d) 11. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-23: 1. Prior to construction of any residential units on the subject property, a use permit application for the seven unit project shall be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator. 2. Additional open space over and above the minimum required by code shall be provided on each lot in an amount equal to the area gained by not having to provide two full 25 foot wide driveways. 3. One central driveway (reciprocal easement for egress and ingress) to serve both parcels shall be provided. C-3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-28 APPLICANT: CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH LOCATION: 20122 Magnolia Street (approximately 450 feet south of Adams Avenue) Conditional Use Permit No. 89-28 is a request to add a 1,200 square foot, modular office building to the existing Christ Presbyterian Church pursuant to Section 9630 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-28 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Ken R. Smith, 8705 Hummingbird Avenue, applicant, spoke in support of the request and urged the Commission to approve. He said becasue of a very marginal budget he would like to eliminate restroom facilities in the modular building since there is a facility within 20 feet. He requested the condition be revised to allow flexibility in submitting a sewer and water plan should the restroom facilities not be required by the Building Department. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -7- (3292d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY MOUNTFORD, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-28, WITH FINDINGS AND AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed 1,200 square foot, modular office building properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 2. The combination and relationship of one proposed use to another on a site are properly integrated. 3. The access to and parking for the proposed 1,200 square foot, modular office building does not create an undue traffic problem. 4. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 89-28 will not be detrimental to the City's General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated June 9, 1989, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit a sewer and water plan to the Public Works Department for approval if determined necessary by the City Engineer. 3. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 5. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -8- (3292d) 7. No outside storage shall be permitted, except for storage in conjunction with construction activity. 8. Exterior building materials and colors shall be compatible with other structures on site. 9. All previous conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 80-14 and Conditional Use Permit No. 85-61 shall remain in effect. C-4 USE PERMIT NO 89-28/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20 APPLICANT: STEICHEN ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE LOCATION: 17751 Beach Boulevard (southwest corner at Newman Avenue) Use Permit No. 89-28/Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-20 is a request for a 380 square foot addition to an existing 1,040 square foot dental office building, including an exterior building remodel. The conditional exception is required because after required street dedication on the exterior side of the lot, the building's setback will be 4 feet-8 inches in lieu of the 10 feet required (Section 9220.7). In addition, the development does not meet perimeter landscaping requirements; the lot has landscape planter strips between 3 feet-8 inches and 4 feet-8 inches in width in lieu of 6 feet required (Section 9608(f)). Finally, the existing building has a nonconforming front setback of 32 feet-8 inches without the additional landscaping required where a building encroaches into the 50 foot setback (Sectional District Map). Use Permits along Beach Boulevard are referred to the Planning Commission by policy. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Use Permit No. 89-28 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-20 with findings and conditions of approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Dr. Robert Krough, 17781 Beach Boulevard, spoke in opposition to the request. He said there is a pending lawsuit against Dr. Danes regarding the parking situation on the property. He objects to the increased intensity of the use because he feels it will add to the parking problems. He requested that one parking space be designated as a common easement area for ingress and egress to alleviate problems. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -9- (3292d) Chuck Steichen, representing the applicant, spoke in support of the request. He said he is not aware of any pending litigation on the property and feels they are meeting all parking requirements. He urged the Commission to approve the project. He asked for deletion of Condition 2.f. because he feels it will severely limit future development of the property and does not feel it is justified. He also said that the sign in front of the property does not belong to Dr. Danes and therefore does not feel they have the right to remove it, however said their name would be removed from the sign pole. Dr. Danes, property owner, spoke in support of the project. He said he plans to retire and give his business to his daughter. He said he did not have any knowledge of a pending lawsuit. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed several alternatives to alleviate parking problems on the property. They were concerned about the alleged litigation. A continuance was suggested in order to allow staff and the architect time to redesign the driveway so that reciprocal access would not be necessary and to allow the City Attorney to verify the alleged lawsuit. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO CONTINUE USE PERMIT NO. 89-28 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-20 TO THE AUGUST 15, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford NOES: None ABSENT: Leipzig (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED D. ITEMS NOT PUBLIC HEARING D-1 REOUEST FOR 60-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO, 87-29 APPLICANT: Michael A. Duran/The Hale Corporation LOCATION: 8201 Newman (northeast corner of Newman and Van Buren) The City Council, on July 18, 1988, overruled the Planning Commission and approved Administrative Review No. 87-29 and upheld the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Exception No. 87-68. The project is a request to construct a three-story, 10,567 square foot medical office building with joint use of parking. The variance request, which was denied, was to reduce a landscape planter width and reduce an exterior sideyard setback. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -10- (3292d) 7 L The applicant is requesting a 60-day extension of time for Administrative Review No. 87-29, based upon delays in obtaining recordation of the approved CC&Rs from the County of Orange, as required prior to issuance of building permits. In addition, staff has investigated the status of the applicant's plan check process. The applicant is finalizing plan check corrections with Planning and Building and expects to obtain construction permits within the 60-day extension period and commence construction. Section 9811.6.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code specifies that upon written application a one-year extension of time may be granted, if practical difficulties arise which make implementation of an approved administrative review impossible within the scope of time provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 60-day extension of time for Administrative Review No. 87-29 to September 15, 1989, with all conditions of approval to remain in effect. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY WILLIAMS, TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL OCTOBER 16, 1989, TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXTENSION GRANTED ON ADJOINING PROPERTY (CUP 87-17/CE 88-19), WITH ALL PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN EFFECT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford NOES: None ABSENT: Leipzig (Out of Room) ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED D-2 REQUEST FOR SECOND ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-28 APPLICANT: Leader Partnership LOCATION: 8102 Ellis Avenue (south side of Ellis Avenue approximately 500 feet east of Beach Boulevard) James Lu, General Partner of Leader Partnership, is requesting a second one-year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-28. Conditional Use Permit No. 87-28 is a request for a 140-room senior rest/retirement home and was approved by the Planning Commission on August 4, 1987. The project was appealed and the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit No. 87-28 on September 8, 1987. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -11- (3292d) On July 19, 1988, the Planning Commission approved a one-year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-28. The applicant is requesting a second one-year extension of time in order to negotiate an easement with the property owner to the west and obtain construction financing. The building permits have been approved by the Public Works, Planning and Building Departments. The Fire Department has not approved the building permits, thus the applicant is requesting additional time. Section 9843.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code specifies that upon written request by the applicant, the Planning Commission may grant extensions of time not to exceed one year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-28 to September 8, 1990, with all previous conditions of approval to remain in effect. The Commission expressed concerns with the project being completed. They felt if the developer could not meet all conditions imposed that the project should be abandoned. James Lu, applicant, addressed the Commission and said that all conditions could be met except he was having trouble getting an agreement with his neighbor on reciprocal access and with financing problems because of the nature of the project. The Commission agreed that since so much time and money had been spent on the project that a 6 month extension would be appropriate. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHOMAKER, SECOND BY KIRKLAND, TO APPROVE A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-28, WITH ALL PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO REMAIN IN EFFECT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: Williams ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED 1 PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -12- (3292d) 1 E. DISCUSSION ITEMS E-1 HOME DEPOT - STATUS REPORT A MOTION WAS MADE BY ORTEGA, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, INSTRUCTING THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO DRAFT A LETTER TO HOME DEPOT ADVISING THEM TO IMPLEMENT STEPS IMMEDIATELY IN ORDER TO CONFORM TO ALL REQUIRED CONDITIONS AND THAT NO BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED ON ITEMS REQUIRING PERMITS UNTIL THE REVOCATION HEARING ON AUGUST 1, 1989, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED E-2 PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT REVISIONS TO ARTICLE 985 - DESIGN REVIEW BOARD A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY ORTEGA, DIRECTING STAFF TO PROCEED WITH CODE AMENDMENT REVISIONS TO ARTICLE 985 AND SET FOR PUBLIC HEARING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED E-3 TENTATIVE WORKSHOP OUTLINE Staff was directed to schedule a Planning Commission workshop on Saturday, September 9, 1989, from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM, at an off -site location. E-4 SUBCOMMITTEE LIST The Subcommittee list was accepted by the Commission. Commissioners Leipzig, Kirkland and Shomaker agreed to serve on the Division 9 Rewrite/Code Amendment. PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -13- (3292d) E-5 REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 88-29 (HEBREW ACADEMY) - STATUS REPORT A MOTION WAS MADE BY WILLIAMS, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, REQUESTING AN UPDATED STATUS REPORT ON SITE CONDITIONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE AUGUST 1, 1989 MEETING INCLUDING VERIFICATION THAT ALL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS ARE BEING MAINTAINED AND TO INVESTIGATE THE PROPOSED SALE OF 8 OF THE 10 ACRES, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED F. PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES None G. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Ortega asked staff to keep her informed on the Minute Action regarding the park site designation within the Ellis/Goldenwest Specific Plan area and also requested a copy of the Water Report presented by Jeff Renna at the June 6, 1989 meeting. H. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS None I. ADJOURNMENT A MOTION WAS MADE AT 9:30 PM BY BOURGUIGNON, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO ADJOURN TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING, TUESDAY, AUGUST 1, 1989, AT 7:00 PM, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Williams, Bourguignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED APPROVED BY: V I Lt, Mike Adams, Secretary P anning C mmission ai n PC Minutes - 7/18/89 -14- (3292d)